Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: does timing matter?

The optimal time of starting adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is now well-accepted as standard for high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, however the optimal time to initiate AC remains elusive.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed and Embase databases. The Hazard ratio (HR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate primary endpoints. All analyses were conducted using Stata software version 12.0 with the Random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies were included in our study. Upon comparison on overall survival (OS), we identified that delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after operation was significantly associated with poor OS (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.27-1.48; P < 0.01). The poor prognostic value of AC delay for > 8 weeks was not undermined by subgroup analysis based on region, tumor site, sample size and study quality. No obvious differences were observed in survival between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.96 -1.10; P = 0.46). Moreover, two studies both highlighted that the survival benefit of AC was still statistically significant when AC was applied 5-6 months after surgery compared with the non-chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Delaying the initiation of AC for > 8 weeks after surgery was significantly associated with poor OS. AC started within 8 weeks after surgery brought more benefits to CRC patients. There were no obvious differences in survival benefits between AC within 5-8 weeks and ≤ 4 weeks. Compared to patients not receiving AC after surgery, a delay of approximately 5-6 months was still useful to improve prognosis.

Tackling Surgical Morbidity and Mortality through Modifiable Risk Factors in Cancer Patients

Despite advances in surgical techniques, surgical morbidity and mortality remain important public health problems. Postoperative complications often lead to greater morbidity and mortality, as well as increased length of hospital stay and medical costs. Therefore, a reduction in postoperative complications is particularly important with regard to positive long-term outcomes in patients with cancer. To improve patients' postoperative prognosis, it is necessary to screen for and focus on modifiable risk factors and their subsequent resolution. Recently, it was reported that nutritional status, inflammation and surgical approaches are related to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in this review article, we describe the current evidence regarding modifiable risk factors influencing surgical morbidity and mortality as well as future directions for improved postoperative management in cancer patients.

Association of hospital factors and socioeconomic status with the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer over a decade

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is a mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to have improved outcomes compared to open procedures for colorectal malignancy. While use of MIS has been increasing, there remains large variability in its implementation at the hospital and patient level.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify disparities in sex, race, location, patient income status, insurance status, hospital region, bed size and teaching status for the use of MIS in the treatment of CRC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database. Between 2008 and 2017, there were 412,292 hospitalizations of adult patients undergoing elective colectomy for CRC. The primary outcome was use of MIS during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Overall, the frequency of open colectomies was higher than MIS (56.56% vs. 43.44%). Black patients were associated with decreased odds of MIS use during hospitalization compared to White patients (OR 0.921, p = 0.0011). As the county population where patients resided decreased, odds of MIS also significantly decreased as compared to central counties of metropolitan areas. As income decreased below the reference of $71,000, odds of MIS also significantly decreased. Medicaid and uninsured patients had decreased odds of MIS use during hospitalization compared to private insurance (OR 0.751, p < 0.0001 and OR 0.629, p < 0.0001 respectively). Rural and urban non-teaching hospitals were associated with decreased odds of MIS as compared to urban teaching hospitals (OR 0.523, p < 0.0001 and OR 0.837, p < 0.0001 respectively). Hospitals with a small bed size were also associated with decreased MIS during hospitalizations (OR 0.888, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Marked hospital level and socioeconomic disparities exist for utilization of MIS for colorectal cancer. Strategies targeted at reducing these gaps have the potential to improve surgical outcomes and cancer survival.

Are patients living far from hospital at higher risk of late adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer?

INTRODUCTION

Late adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) administration after colectomy (> 56 days) is known to be associated with impaired prognosis. We aim to identify risk factors associated with late aCT, especially the travel time between patients' home and hospital.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective monocentre cohort study. Patients included had a colectomy for a stage III or "high risk" stage II colon cancer between 2009 and 2015 performed at a French university hospital. Risk factors for late aCT were identified using a fractional polynomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Ninety-four patients were included. The risk of late aCT was associated with travel time length, emergent colectomy, the need for scheduled care before aCT, and length of time between colectomy and postoperative multidisciplinary meeting advising aCT.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that, in patients with colon cancer, factors unrelated to disease severity and complexity could be associated with a higher risk of late aCT.

Reasons for delay in timely administration of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer: a multicentre cohort study from the McGill University Department of Oncology

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy within 56 or 84 days following curative resection is globally accepted as the standard of care for stage III colon cancer as it has been associated with improved overall survival. Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy within this time frame is therefore recommended by clinical practice guidelines, including the European Society for Medical Oncology. The objective of this study was to evaluate adherence to these clinical practice guidelines for patients with stage III colon cancer across the Rossy Cancer Network (RCN); a partnership of McGill University's Faculty of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Jewish General Hospital and St Mary's Hospital Center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

187 patients who had been diagnosed with stage III colon cancer and received adjuvant chemotherapy within the RCN partner hospitals from 2012 to 2015 were included. Patient and treatment information was retrospectively determined by chart review. Χ² and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to measure associations and a multivariate Cox regression model was used to determine risk factors contributing to delays in administration of adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median turnaround time between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy was 69 days. Importantly, only 27% of patients met the 56-day target, and 71% met the 84-day target. Increasing age, having more than one surgical complication and being diagnosed between 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 reduced the likelihood that patients met these targets. Furthermore, delays were observed at most intervals from surgery to first adjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study found that within these academic hospital settings, 27% of patients met the 56-day target, and 71% met the 84-day target. Delays were associated with hospital, surgeon and patient-related factors. Initiatives in quality improvement are needed in order to improve adherence to recommended treatment guidelines for prompt administration of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer.

High level of unmet needs and anxiety are associated with delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer patients

AIMS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of unmet supportive care needs and anxiety on the initiation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from a single tertiary referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer who met the inclusion criteria were included. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and modified 34-item Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS-SF34) were applied to assess patient's anxiety level and unmet needs. The time intervals between initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy and operation were recorded. Factors associated with delayed initiation of chemotherapy were investigated in univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients with colorectal cancer were included. In total, 16.3% (22/135) and 5.2% (7/135) reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. In multivariate analysis, low to moderate income status, postoperative complications, anxiety, and high level of unmet needs are independent risk factors for late initiation of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that psychological problems such as anxiety and high unmet supportive needs are correlated with delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.

Racial Comparisons in Timeliness of Colon Cancer Treatment in an Equal-Access Health System

BACKGROUND

Non-Hispanic black (NHB) adults with cancer may have longer time-to-treatment than non-Hispanic whites (NHW) in the United States. Unequal access to medical care may partially account for this racial disparity. This study aimed to investigate whether there were racial differences in time-to-treatment and in treatment delays for patients diagnosed with colon cancer in the equal-access Military Health System (MHS).

METHODS

Patients age 18-79 years diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2014, were identified in the Department of Defense Central Cancer Registry and the MHS Data Repository-linked databases. Median time-to-treatment (surgery and chemotherapy) and 95% confidence intervals were compared between NHBs and NHWs in multivariable quantile regression models. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of receiving delayed treatment defined by guidelines for NHBs relative to NHWs were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 3067) had a mean age at diagnosis of 58.4 (12.2) years and the racial distribution was 76.7% NHW and 23.3% NHB. Median adjusted time-to-treatment was similar for NHB compared to NHW patients. The likelihood of receiving delayed treatment was similar between NHB and NHW patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the MHS, there was no evidence of treatment delays for NHBs compared to NHWs, suggesting the role of equal access to medical care and insurance coverage in reducing racial disparities in colon cancer treatment.

Impact of postoperative major complications on long-term survival after radical resection of gastric cancer

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the impact of postoperative major complications on long-term survival following curative gastrectomy.

Methods

This retrospective study included 239 patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy at the Beijing Cancer Hospital from February 2012 to January 2013. Survival curves were compared between patients with major complications (mC group) and those without major complications (NmC group). Multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results

Postoperative complication and mortality rates were 24.7 and 0.8%, respectively. The severity of complications was graded in accordance with the Clavien–Dindo classification. The incidence of minor complications (grades I-II) and major complications (grades III–V) was 9.2 and 15.5%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were better in the NmC group than in the mC group (p = 0.014, p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis identified major complications as an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. After stratification by pathological stage, this trend was also observed in stage II patients.

Conclusions

Postoperative major complications adversely affect OS and DFS. The prevention and early diagnosis of complications are essential to minimize the negative effects of complications on surgical safety and long-term patient survival.

Safety and feasibility of in-hospital early chemotherapy initiation after surgery in patients with stage II-IV colon cancer

Although it is recommended to initiate postoperative chemotherapy for colon cancer within 8 weeks after surgery, the feasibility and impact of initiating chemotherapy before discharge after surgical resection has not been investigated.Patients with stage II-IV colon cancer who received postoperative chemotherapy were dichotomized into early (chemotherapy initiation before discharge) and control (chemotherapy initiation after discharge) groups. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with delayed chemotherapy, defined as more than 6 or 8 weeks after surgery.From January 2004 to December 2012, of 729 patients with stage II-IV colon adenocarcinoma, 555 patients (76.1%) underwent postoperative chemotherapy. Of them, 181 (32.6%) patients were included in the early group. Time to initiation of chemotherapy was significantly shorter in the early group than in the control group (14.9 days vs 31.5 days, P < . 001). Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor stage and chemotherapy initiation strategy (odds ratio 8.4; 95% confidence interval, 1-66, P = .041) were independent predictors of delayed initiation of chemotherapy at more than 8 weeks. There was no difference in the completion rate of planned chemotherapy cycles between the 2 groups (P > .05).The strategy of initiating chemotherapy before discharge after surgery is safe and feasible and might reduce the potential delay in chemotherapy initiation in patients with colon cancer.

Timing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in Colorectal, Gastric, and Pancreatic Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: The optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in gastrointestinal malignancies is still a matter of debate. For colorectal cancer, it is recommended to start post-operative treatment within eight weeks. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical effects of starting adjuvant CT within or after 6–8 weeks post-surgery in colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. (2) Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched in December 2018. Publications comparing the outcomes of patients treated with adjuvant CT administered before (early) or after (delayed) 6–8 weeks post-surgery for colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). (3) Results: Out of 8752 publications identified, 34 comparative studies assessing a total of 141,853 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant increased risk of death with delayed CT (>6–8 weeks post-surgery) in colorectal cancer (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21–1.33; p <0.001). Similarly, for gastric cancer, delaying adjuvant CT was associated with inferior overall survival (HR = 1.2, 95% CI 1.04–1.38; p = 0.01). Conversely, the benefit of earlier CT was not evident in pancreatic cancer (HR = 1, 95% CI 1–1.01; p = 0.37). Conclusions: Starting adjuvant CT within 6–8 weeks post-surgery is associated with a significant survival benefit for colorectal and gastric cancer, but not for pancreatic cancer.

Timing of postoperative chemotherapy in patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy and gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

For patients who qualify for perioperative chemotherapy and gastrectomy for gastric cancer, the optimal timing of the postoperative chemotherapy (PC) seems equivocal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of timing of PC on overall survival (OS) in patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy and gastrectomy with curative intent (2010-2014) were extracted from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Timing of PC was analyzed as a linear and categorical variable (<6 weeks, 6-8 weeks, and >8 weeks). Risk factors for a late start of PC (≥6 weeks), and the association between timing of PC and OS were assessed by multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 1066 patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy and gastrectomy, 463 (43%) patients started PC. PC was administered within 6 weeks in 208 (45%) patients, within 6-8 weeks in 155 (33%) patients, and after 8 weeks in 100 (22%) patients. A total of 419 (91%) and 351 (76%) patients finished all cycles of preoperative and PC, respectively. A late start of PC was associated with a longer hospital stay (+1 hospital day: OR 1.15, 95% CI [1.08-1.23], p < 0.001). Timing of PC was not associated with OS (6-8 weeks vs. <6 weeks, HR 1.14, 95% CI [0.79-1.65], p = 0.471; >8 weeks vs. <6 weeks, HR 1.04, 95% CI [0.79-1.65], p = 0.872).

CONCLUSION

Timing of postoperative chemotherapy does not influence survival in patients receiving perioperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. The results suggest that the early postoperative period may be safely used for recovery and optimizing patients for the start of PC.

Impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in stage III colon cancer: a population-based study

Background

There is no consensus regarding the optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for stage III colon cancer, and the relevant postoperative complications that cause delays in adjuvant chemotherapy are unknown.

Methods

Eligible patients aged ≥66 years who were diagnosed with stage III colon cancer from 1992 to 2008 were identified using the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazards model were utilized to evaluate the impact of the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 18,491 patients were included. Delayed adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with worse OS (9–12 weeks: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.222, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.063–1.405; 13–16 weeks: HR = 1.252, 95% CI = 1.041–1.505; ≥ 17 weeks: HR = 1.969, 95% CI = 1.663–2.331). The efficacies of adjuvant chemotherapy within 5–8 weeks and ≤4 weeks were similar (HR = 1.045, 95% CI = 0.921–1.185). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, chemotherapy initiated at ≥21 weeks did not significantly improve OS (HR = 0.882, 95% CI = 0.763–1.018). Patients with postoperative complications, particularly cardiac arrest, ostomy infection, shock, and septicemia, had a significantly higher risk of a 4- to 11-week delay in adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy initiated within 8 weeks was acceptable for patients with stage III colon cancer. Delayed adjuvant chemotherapy after 8 weeks was significantly associated with worse OS. However, adjuvant chemotherapy might still be useful even with a delay of approximately 5 months. Moreover, postoperative complications were significantly associated with delayed adjuvant chemotherapy.

Delay in Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival Advantage in Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection is the standard of care for stage III colon cancer, yet many patients omit chemotherapy. We aimed to describe the impact of delayed chemotherapy on overall survival across multiple time points.

STUDY DESIGN

The 2006 to 2014 National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for patients with single primary stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon. Patients were grouped by receipt and timing of chemotherapy from resection date: chemotherapy omitted, <6 weeks, 6 to 8 weeks, 8 to 12 weeks, 12 to 24 weeks, and >24 weeks. Subgroup analyses were performed for those with comorbidities and those who had postoperative complications. Overall survival was compared using Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusting for patient, tumor, and facility characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 72,057 patients were included; 20,807 omitted chemotherapy, 22,705 received it at <6 weeks, 15,412 between 6 and 8 weeks, 9,049 between 8 and 12 weeks, 3,595 between 12 and 24 weeks, and 489 at >24 weeks after resection. Compared with patients who omitted chemotherapy, patients who received chemotherapy at <6 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44), 6 to 8 weeks (HR 0.45), 8 to 12 weeks (HR 0.52), 12 to 24 weeks (HR 0.61), and >24 weeks (HR 0.68) had superior overall survival (p < 0.001). This survival benefit was preserved across subgroups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After resection of stage III colon cancer, patients should receive adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 to 8 weeks for maximal benefit. However, chemotherapy should be offered to patients who are outside the optimal window, who have significant comorbidities, or who have had a complication more than 24 weeks from resection to improve the overall survival compared with omitting chemotherapy.

Survival and time interval from surgery to the start of chemotherapy for patients with stage II and III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Usually adjuvant chemotherapy is started within 12 weeks of surgery, but the evidence on the commencing time is lacking. Our aim was to investigate the association of initiating post-surgery treatment within six weeks vs. six to ten weeks vs. more than ten weeks with survival.

METHODS

We analysed the association of treatment and its timing with survival among patients who were diagnosed and underwent surgery for stage II or III colon cancer from 2012 to 2013 at the National Cancer Institute, Lithuania.

RESULTS

Of the 86 patients, 78% were still alive on December 31, 2013. Patients who received chemotherapy within six weeks after surgery were more likely to survive. However, those who received chemotherapy 6-10 weeks after surgery had better survival (p - 0.014, hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-0.99) than those who began chemotherapy treatment more than ten weeks after surgery (p - 0.173 hazard ratio 0.55, 95% CI 0.12-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study show that optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected colon cancer within six weeks and associated with better survival.

The impact of delayed commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy (eight or more weeks) on survival in stage II and III colon cancer: a national population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

To examine the impact of chemotherapy delay on survival in patients with stage II or III colon cancer and the factors associated with the delay (≥8 weeks) of adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in a national population-based cohort were included.

RESULTS

Among 5355 patients, 154 (2.9%) received chemotherapy more than 8 weeks after surgery. Based on a multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks were older age [65 to 74 years (hazard ratio [HR]=1.48) and ≥75 years (HR=1.69), p=0.0354], medical aid status in the health security system (HR=1.76, p=0.0345), and emergency surgery (HR=2.43, p=0.0002). Using an 8-week cutoff, the 3-year overall survival rate was 89.62% and 80.98% in the <8 weeks and ≥8 weeks groups, respectively (p=0.008). Independent prognostic factors for inferior overall survival included chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks (HR=1.49, p=0.0365), older age [65 to 74 years (HR=1.94) and ≥75 years (HR=3.41), p<0.0001], TNM stage III (HR=2.46, p<0.0001), emergency surgery (HR=1.89, p<0.0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or higher (HR=1.50, p<0.0001), and higher transfusion amounts (HR=1.09, p=0.0392).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that delayed commencement of adjuvant chemotherapy, defined as ≥ 8 weeks, is associated with inferior overall survival in colon cancer patients with stage II or III disease. The delay to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is influenced by several multidimensional factors, including patient factors (older age), insurance status (medical aid), and treatment-related factors (emergency surgery).

Age and factors associated with access and time to post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer: a French epidemiological study

Background

Studies have shown the negative prognostic impact of increased time between colectomy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colon cancer (CC). Our aim was to investigate the role of age and non-organizational factors on access and time to AC.

Methods

All adult patients undergoing surgery for stage II or III CC in the "Région Centre-Val de Loire" in 2013, were selected. Time to AC and socio-demographic factors were collected. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify factors associated with access to AC, and a multivariate analysis performed to identify factors associated with time to AC.

Results

Among 404 stage II or III patients who underwent colectomy, 182 (45%; sex ratio 1.5; mean age 67.6 years; range 32-90) received AC. AC patients were younger than those without AC (67.6 vs. 77.9 years) and the difference was even greater for stage III patients (69.0 vs. 82.4). The median time to AC was 48 days, exceeding 42 days in 60% of cases. Living alone, postoperative morbidities, and emergency colectomy were independently associated with increased time to AC. Age and other factors were not associated with delayed AC.

Conclusions

Emergency colectomy, postoperative morbidities, and living alone are associated with increased time to AC. Organizational measures to reduce the time to AC are therefore unlikely to have an impact. In contrast, age is not associated with increased time to AC, but to access to AC. Reasons for omitting AC in older patients requires further study.

Impact of postoperative complications on readmission and long-term survival in patients following surgery for colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

It is well known that specific postoperative complications such as stroke influence readmissions and overall survival (OS) after surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Whether overall hospital morbidity is associated with increased risk of readmission and poorer long-term survival is unknown. New tools are available to accurately quantify overall morbidity, such as the comprehensive complication index (CCI). The aim is to evaluate the impact of complications on readmission and overall survival (OS) in patients operated for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Postoperative complications of patients undergoing surgery for CRC were assessed over a 5-year period using the Clavien-Dindo classification, and overall morbidity was assessed by using the CCI. Individual scores were analyzed regarding their association with readmission and OS by using the multivariate logistic and Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-four patients were operated for CRC, of which 22 (8%) were readmitted. One hundred five patients (37%) developed at least one postoperative complication during the hospital stay. While single complications or the use of severe complication only (grade ≥IIIb) was not associated with readmission, overall morbidity (CCI) predicted readmission (OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.0-1.04), p = 0.044). Similarly, morbidity assessed by the CCI had a significant negative predictive value on OS, e.g., patients with a CCI of 20 were 22% more likely to die within a 5-year follow-up, when compared to patients with a CCI of 10 (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall combined morbidity as assessed by the CCI leads to more frequent readmission, and is associated with poorer long-term survival after surgery for CRC.

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: Improved compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy and survival

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer has been demonstrated in clinical trials to have short-term benefits when compared to the open surgical approach. Guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend that patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. We hypothesized that laparoscopic colectomy is associated with increased compliance to recommendations for chemotherapy, a lesser time to start of chemotherapy, and increased overall survival.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify patients with stage III or high-risk stage II colon cancer (T4, positive margins, <12 lymph nodes, or high tumor grade) diagnosed 2010-2012. Patients were divided into laparoscopic colectomy and open colectomy groups. Intent-to-treat analysis was used with converted cases included in the laparoscopic colectomy group. Rates of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, time from diagnosis and date of operation to start of chemotherapy, and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 48,257 patients were included for analysis; 18,801 patients underwent laparoscopic colectomy and 29,456 underwent open colectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy patients received adjuvant chemotherapy at a somewhat greater rate than open colectomy (66.2% vs 59.4%, P < .01). Among patients who received chemotherapy, mean time to start of chemotherapy after definitive resection was somewhat less for laparoscopic colectomy than open colectomy (48.7 vs 52.7 days, P < .01). Two-year overall survival was greater for laparoscopic colectomy than open colectomy (81.9% vs 73.2%, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Compared to open colectomy, laparoscopic colectomy is associated with somewhat greater rates of compliance with guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer, as well as a slightly lesser time to start of chemotherapy and improved overall survival.

Impact on Survival on Interval between Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Completely Resected Stage IB-IIIA Lung Cancer

Background and Objectives

Complete surgical resection is recommended for early stage lung cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy is given for stage IB to IIIA disease. No studies have examined the best timing to administer chemotherapy after surgery in lung cancer. This study was to investigate the optimal timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection.

Methods

Data collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between January, 2004 and December, 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with stage IB to IIIA lung cancer underwent complete surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were included. A total of 1522 patients were included. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the interval between surgery and chemotherapy: group 1, < 30 days; group 2, 30–45 days; group 3, 46–60 days; group 4 > 60 days. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall survival.

Results

The numbers of patients in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 153, 161, 290, and 818, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 41% in group 1, 48% in group 2, 50% in group 3, and 35% in group 4 (p<0.001). The median survival time was 44.50 months in group 1, 59.53 months in group 2, 67.33 months in group 3 and 36.33 months in group 4 (p<0.001) Survival rate is the poorest when chemotherapy is delayed beyond 60 days after surgical resection Multivariate analysis also indicated the interval between surgery and first course of chemotherapy more than 60 days after surgery was an independent risk factor for survival.

Conclusions

Timing of chemotherapy after surgery is associated with poorer survival in lung cancer patients.

Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy within 8 weeks of elective colorectal resection improves overall survival regardless of reoperation

AIM

Reoperation after elective colorectal resection may delay the start of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The study investigated the dual impact of a reoperation and AC delay on overall survival (OS).

METHOD

The Hospital Episode Statistics database was analysed between 1997 and 2012. Patients were divided into colon and rectal cancer cohorts and data were analysed based on whether there was delay in receiving AC beyond 8 weeks and whether a patient suffered reoperation within 30 days. Multivariate regression analysis was undertaken to investigate the relationship between delay in giving AC and reoperation and their combined effect on OS.

RESULTS

Logistic regression showed reoperation, amongst other things, to be an independent predictor of AC delay, in both colon and rectal cancer (colon, odds ratio 2.31, P < 0.001; rectal, odds ratio 2.19, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in OS between patients who had no AC delay but suffered a reoperation and patients who had no AC delay and no reoperation. Patients who had AC delay but no reoperation, however, had significantly worse OS compared to those who had no AC delay and no reoperation [colon, hazard ratio (HR) 1.16, P < 0.001; rectal, HR 1.17, P < 0.001]. Individuals who had both AC delay and a reoperation also had worse OS compared with patients who had neither (colon, HR 1.33, P = 0.037; rectal, HR 1.38, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Delayed receipt of AC beyond 8 weeks after surgery is associated with significantly reduced OS regardless of reoperation status in both colon and rectal cancer patients.

Impact on survival of timing and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in radically resected gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival of patients with gastric cancer. Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach (ITACA-S) was a phase III study comparing sequential FOLFIRI followed by docetaxel/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil monotherapy. The intensive regimen was not superior in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

The treatment was to be started within 8 weeks from surgery. This analysis evaluates the impact of time from surgery to chemotherapy start (TSC) on outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 1,106 randomized, 1,072 patients without major violations of eligibility criteria and receiving at least one treatment cycle were analyzed. Median TSC was 50 days. Chemotherapy was interrupted in 201 (18.8%) cases, whereas it was completed without or with modifications in 277 (25.8%) and 594 (55.4%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 56.9 months, 513 progressions and 472 deaths occurred. A longer TSC was significantly associated with longer DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.00; p = 0.05) and OS (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.86-0.97; p = 0.004), after adjustment for treatment arm, age, sex, primary tumor site, number of resected nodes, and tumor stage. Better treatment compliance was associated with improved survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that longer TSC had at least no detrimental effect on DFS and OS, whereas treatment completion had a protective effect. Our findings need to be confirmed prospectively.

Timing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Impact on Survival for Resected Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Because postoperative convalescence often prolongs the interval between surgery and chemotherapy in patients undergoing treatment for advanced gastric cancer, this study assesses the survival impact of timing of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The 2003-2012 ACS NCDB was analyzed for patients treated with gastrectomy for stages 1-3 gastric cancer. Treatment groups were stratified by time to initiation of AC: initiation of chemotherapy within 8 weeks postoperatively, between 8 and 12 weeks postoperatively, after 12 weeks postoperatively, and no chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of 7942 patients undergoing gastrectomy, 29 % received AC. Of those who received AC, 58 % initiated AC within 8 weeks, 28 % initiated AC between 8 and 12 weeks, and 14 % received AC after 12 weeks. Among patients who received AC, median survival was not significantly different between time cohorts, even when stratified by pathologic stage. Median survival was longer for chemotherapy cohorts when compared with the no chemotherapy cohort, specifically in patients with pathologic stages 2 and 3 disease. In multivariable analysis, patients who received AC had a 27-29 % lower hazard of death (p < .0001), with administration of AC at any time, compared with patients who did not receive AC, but had no difference in hazard when comparing delayed AC to earlier administration of AC.

CONCLUSIONS

Time to initiation of AC does not impact survival. With improved survival over patients who did not receive AC, even delayed initiation of chemotherapy should be offered, when appropriate.

Association Between Time (Initiation and Length) and Oncological Outcomes for the Patients with Colon Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Adjuvant chemotherapy is benefit for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer after curative resection. But, the optimal time between surgical and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. Moreover, no study of efficacy with different lengths of adjuvant chemotherapy has appeared. This study was aimed to identify association between time (initiation and length) and oncological outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy on the stages II and III colon cancer patients. A total of 406 high-risk stages II and III colon cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled in prospectively collected data. They were categorized into three groups representing chemotherapy initiation time: less than 4 weeks (group 1), 4 to 6 weeks (group 2), and more than 6 weeks (group 3). They were categorized into two groups representing chemotherapy length time : less than 200 days (group 1a) and more than 200 days (group 2a). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 74.97 % in group 1, 76.94 % in group 2, and 63.97 % in group 3 (p > 0.05). The 5-year DFS rates were 75.49 % in the group that received adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks and 63.97 % in the group that received adjuvant chemotherapy >6 weeks (p = 0.0539). The 5-year DFS rates were 77.21 % in group 1a and 81.82 % in group 2a (p > 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy should be safely offered within 6 weeks after surgical excision in patients with colon cancer after considering the patient's general physical condition and hematological factors, even if the chemotherapy length is prolonged.

The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy timing on overall survival following colorectal cancer resection

BACKGROUND

Several studies including two meta-analyses have showed that delay between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy adversely impacts colorectal cancer survival. This study investigated this impact at a population level over a fifteen year period in England.

METHODS

The Hospital Episode Statistics database was analysed between 1997 and 2012. Colonic cancer and rectal cancer patients were collated and multivariate Cox regression analyses were undertaken to ascertain the relationship between chemotherapy delay and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 181 984 patients underwent resection without any reoperation (106 477 (58.5%) having colonic cancer and 75 507 (41.5%) having rectal cancer). In total, 30 836 (16.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. 9019 (49.3%), 4573 (25.0%), 2587 (14.1%), 1323 (7.2%) and 804 (4.4%) of 18 306 colonic cancer patients received within 8 weeks, 8-10 weeks, 10-12 weeks, 12-14 weeks and 14-16 weeks, respectively. Sequentially worse overall survival was observed: <8 weeks: Ref; 8-10 wks: Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.09; 10-12 wks: HR 1.13; 12-14 wks HR 1.32 and 14-16 wks: HR 1.32, p < 0.001. 5625 (44.9%), 3087 (24.6%), 1940 (15.5%), 1162 (9.3%) and 716 (5.7%) of 12 530 rectal cancer patients received within 8 weeks, 8-10 weeks, 10-12 weeks, 12-14 weeks and 14-16 weeks, respectively. Sequentially worse overall survival was observed: <8 weeks: Ref; 8-10 wks: HR 1.09; 10-12 wks: HR 1.22; 12-14 wks HR 1.23 and 14-16 wks: HR 1.31, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy delay adversely impacts colonic and rectal cancer survival. Efforts to prevent complications such as reoperation and to improve access to chemotherapy services, will improve survival in this patient cohort.

Factors Affecting Use and Delay (≥8 Weeks) of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Colorectal Cancer Surgery and the Impact of Chemotherapy-Use and Delay on Oncologic Outcomes

Purpose

To evaluate factors affecting the use and delay ≥8 weeks of adjuvant chemotherapy and the impact of chemotherapy use and delay on survival.

Methods

Between 2005 and 2012, consecutive patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer who were treated with major curative resection were enrolled.

Results

Among 750 patients with stage II (n = 318) and III (n = 432) disease, 153 (20.4%) did not receive chemotherapy. Among 597 patients with adjuvant chemotherapy, 31 (5.2%) began chemotherapy 8 weeks or more after surgery. Factors associated with not receiving chemotherapy were: age ≥80 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.2), American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 (HR = 1.9), underlying cerebrovascular disease (HR = 1.7), stage II disease (HR = 2.0), presence of postoperative complications (HR = 2.2), or intensive care unit admission (HR = 2.4). Factors associated with chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks were: male sex (HR = 4.2), rectal primary cancer (HR = 5.4), or presence of postoperative complications (HR = 2.5). Independent prognostic factors for overall survival included TNM III stage (HR = 2.04) and chemotherapy delay ≥8 weeks (HR = 0.39) or <8 weeks (HR = 0.22). Independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival were TNM III stage (HR = 2.26) and chemotherapy delay <8 weeks (HR = 0.35).

Conclusions

Postoperative complications were associated with both lack of and delayed chemotherapy. Timely initiation of chemotherapy, defined as <8 weeks, was a favorable prognostic factor for overall and recurrence-free survival. To increase the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy and timely initiation of chemotherapy, surgical complications should be minimized after curative resection.

Improved survival with early adjuvant chemotherapy after colonic resection for stage III colonic cancer: A nationwide study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In stage III colonic cancer, time from surgery to start of adjuvant chemotherapy may influence survival. In this study, we evaluated the effect of timing of adjuvant therapy on survival.

METHODS

Database study from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group's national database. Data on patients with stage III colonic cancer operated between January 1, 2005 and August 31, 2012 were retrieved. Perioperative variables, surgical modality, and time to adjuvant therapy (<4, 4-8, or >8 weeks) were evaluated and Cox regression was performed to identify factors influencing survival.

RESULTS

The final population included 1,827 patients scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant therapy started within 4 and 8 weeks improved survival when compared to start later than 8 weeks (HR [95%CI]: 1.7 [1.1-2.6]; P = 0.024 and 1.4 [1.07-1.8]; P = 0.013, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference in survival with start after 4 versus 8 weeks (1.2 [0.8-1.8]; P = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival increased when adjuvant therapy was started within 8 weeks after surgery for stage III colonic cancer.

Effect of Adjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy Duration on Outcomes of Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated that patients with stage III colon cancer who receive adjuvant FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy experience an improved disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the magnitude of benefit among patients who discontinue FOLFOX early is not well known. We sought to examine the rate of FOLFOX treatment completion, determine the factors associated with adherence, and explore the relationship between duration of FOLFOX treatment and survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer from 2006 to 2010 and initiated at least 1 cycle of adjuvant FOLFOX at any 1 of 5 regional cancer centers in British Columbia. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine the clinical factors associated with treatment completion, which was defined as receipt of ≥ 10 cycles of FOLFOX. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression that accounted for known prognostic factors were used to evaluate the relationship between early FOLFOX discontinuation and DFS and OS.

RESULTS

We identified 616 patients: median age of 62 years (range, 26-80), 321 (52%) men, 536 (87%) with T3/4 tumors, and 245 (40%) with N2 disease. Among them, 183 (30%) received < 10 and 433 (70%) received ≥ 10 cycles. Adjusting for covariates, female sex and the absence of obstruction or perforation were each associated with receiving ≥ 10 cycles of FOLFOX (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.32; P = .01 and OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08-3.05; P = .02, respectively). In multivariate analyses, early discontinuation of FOLFOX did not affect DFS or OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.82-1.63; P = .40 and HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.70-1.61; P = .76, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Early discontinuation of FOLFOX was not associated with differences in survival outcomes, lending support to clinical trials that are under way to evaluate the efficacy of shorter durations of therapy.

Factors Implicated for Delay of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of administering adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in colorectal cancer is well established, as is the impact of its timing. Although various factors have been associated with treatment delay, their implications remain controversial. We determined clinicopathological factors associated with delay in transition to AC via systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies assessing factors for delay in initiating AC were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Databases. Studies were included only if relevant clinicopathological factors were adequately described and appropriate comparative groups were balanced. For each study, the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were estimated, regarding response to early versus delayed AC initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 15 eligible studies involving 67,537 patients. Twelve studies were multicentre studies and three were single-center cohort studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated age >75 years [4 studies, OR = 1.44 (95 % CI 1.32-1.58)], marital status-single [3 studies, OR = 1.32 (95 % CI 1.20-1.44)], low socioeconomic status (SES) [7 studies, OR = 1.67 (95 % CI 1.32-2.12)], worse comorbidity status [5 studies, OR = 1.47 (95 % CI 1.14-1.90)], low tumour grade [7 studies, OR = 1.06 (95 % CI 1.02-1.11)], prolonged length of stay [3 studies, OR 2.37 (95 % CI 2.10-2.68)], and readmission [3 studies, OR = 3.23 (95 % CI 1.66-6.26)] were significant predictors of delayed initiation of AC. Laparoscopy compared to an open surgical approach was a significant predictor of earlier AC initiation [5 studies, OR = 0.70 (95 % CI 0.51-0.97)].

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy is associated with earlier initiation of AC, encouraging its increased adoption. Social isolation and low SES merit consideration of approaches that counter the lack of social support and deprivation to improve cancer outcomes.

Comparison of compliance of adjuvant chemotherapy between laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with colon cancer

Purpose

Many studies have shown that the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival rate. Recently, laparoscopic surgery has been used to treat patients with colon cancer. We analyzed the relationship between the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and the operation method.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 147 patients diagnosed with colon cancer from January 1, 2009, to May 31, 2012. The numbers of patients who underwent laparoscopic and open surgery were 91 and 56, respectively. We analyzed the relationship between the operation method and various factors such as the completion rate of chemotherapy, the patient's age, gender, and physical activity, the postoperative hospital stay, the start time of chemotherapy, and the patient's body mass index (BMI), TNM stage, and type of health insurance.

Results

In the laparoscopic surgery group, the postoperative hospital stay (13.5 ± 14.82 days vs. 19.6 ± 11.38 days, P = 0.001) and start time of chemotherapy (17.7 ± 17.48 days vs. 23.0 ± 15.00 days, P = 0.044) were shorter, but the percent complete of chemotherapy (71/91 [78.0%] vs. 38/56 [67.8%], P = 0.121), and survival rate (88/91 [96.7%], 47/56 [83.9%], P = 0.007) were higher than they were in the open surgery group. Patients who were elderly, had a low BMI, and a high American Society of Anesthesiologists score were less likely to complete adjuvant chemotherapy than other patients were.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic surgery shows a shorter postoperative hospital stay, a shorter start time of chemotherapy, and a higher survival rate. Laparoscopic surgery may be expected to increase compliance of chemotherapy and to improve survival rate.

Effect of delay in adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Less than 8 weeks has been recommended as the optimal time to initiate AC based on 2 meta-analyses that suggested worse survival with delayed AC. However, neither study included patients treated with an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. We aimed to investigate the effect of delay in initiating oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy on RFS and CSS for stage III colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of patients who initiated oxaliplatin-based AC for stage III colon cancer between 2006 and 2011 at the British Columbia Cancer Agency were retrospectively reviewed. Cox proportional models were used to analyze the effect of time to AC (TTAC) on RFS and CSS. TTAC was categorized into ≤ 8 weeks (G1) and > 8 weeks (G2).

RESULTS

Six hundred thirty-five patients were included (G1, n = 291; G2, n = 344). Median time from surgery to initiation of AC was 8.3 weeks. At a median follow-up of 57.9 months, 176 patients (27.7%) had disease recurrence and 118 (18.6%) had died. Five-year RFS was 70.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.2-76.5) for G1 and 72.1% (95% CI, 67.2-77) for G2. Five-year CSS was 82% for G1 (95% CI, 87.09-76.91) and 82.8% for G2 (95% CI, 78.30-87.30). On multivariate analysis, delayed TTAC did not have prognostic significance on either RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; P = .609) or CSS (HR, 1.02; P = .893).

CONCLUSION

In our population-based study, TTAC after stage III colon cancer resection did not have an effect on RFS or CSS. Contrary to most of the existing data, which are primarily based on 5-fluorouracil-based AC, delay of oxaliplatin-based AC beyond 8 weeks did not appear to be associated with inferior outcomes.

Timeliness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III adenocarcinoma of the colon: a measure of quality of care

BACKGROUND

Findings from multiple clinical trials established AC as a standard of care for stage III colon cancer. However, there is no recommended standard time for delivery of AC. We explored the timeliness of AC with FOLFOX as a predictor of recurrence and its role as a quality indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with colon cancer who received AC at Los Angeles County Hospital and Norris Cancer Center between 2003 and 2011. Time to recurrence (TTR) was the primary end point of the study, Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to assess the association between timing of the AC and TTR.

RESULTS

We identified 102 patients with stage III colon cancer who had received AC. With a median follow-up of 3.2 years, time from surgery to AC was not a predictor of recurrence (P = .19). However, there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher risk of systemic recurrence when the delay of AC was more than 12 weeks (P = .068). Additionally, a significant association was found between age, race, type of hospital, and timeliness of AC.

CONCLUSION

To date, our study is the largest data set to assess the timeliness of FOLFOX as a predictor of outcome in stage III colon cancer. Because FOLFOX is the current standard for AC for colon cancer, we report a trend toward worse outcome when FOLFOX is delayed more than 12 weeks. This result, thus supports quality measures to assess the timeliness of AC in stage III colon cancer and might have a meaningful effect on the care of patients with colon cancer.

Factors associated with delayed time to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage iii colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy started more than 56 days after colon cancer resection has been associated with lesser overall survival among patients with stage iii colon cancer. The objective of the present population-based study was to determine, in referred patients with resected stage iii colon cancer, factors associated with delayed time to adjuvant chemotherapy (ttac), defined as more than 56 days from the date of surgery.

METHODS

Eligible patients had been diagnosed with stage iii colon cancer and had received at least 1 cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy at one of the four regional cancer treatment sites during 2008-2009. Prognostic and treatment information was prospectively collected through the BC Cancer Agency's GI Cancers Outcomes Unit, and Charlson comorbidity score was retrospectively determined by chart review. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to measure associations between the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and select prognostic and treatment variables.

RESULTS

Median ttac from surgery for the 395 included patients was 58 days, with 54% of the patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy beyond the recommended 56 days. On multivariate analysis, only treatment at the highest-volume site was independently associated with delayed ttac. Comorbidity index, age, performance status, T stage, tumour location, and oral chemotherapy (compared with intravenous) were not independently associated with delayed ttac. Delays were observed during each interval associated with the patient's transition from surgery to first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

More than half the patients failed to receive adjuvant chemotherapy within the recommended ttac of 56 days. Delayed ttac was associated with process-related delays rather than with patient- or disease-related factors. Efforts to improve timely referral, triage of consultations, and chemotherapy wait lists are required.

Current practices and challenges of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in men and women in the developed world. Although surgery is the foundation of curative treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy also improves overall and disease-free survival in high-risk stage II and all stage III patients. Research strongly suggests that the timing from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy is critical, because delays to the start of treatment significantly affect patient outcomes. Both clinical and systemic barriers, such as postoperative complications and institutional wait times, challenge the timely administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. Further research investigating solutions to overcome these barriers is needed.

Optimal time of initiating adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in colorectal cancer patients

Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy is routinely recommended for locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). There are very few data for the optimal starting date of adjuvant chemotherapy after the surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of earlier adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery for stage III CRC.

Methods

In this study, 159 patients with stage III CRC, who had undergone a curative resection, were enrolled retrospectively. Patients were categorized into 3 groups representing different timings to initiate the chemotherapy; less than 2 weeks (group 1), 3 to 4 weeks (group 2), and more than 5 weeks (group 3). The overall survival rate (OS) and the relapse-free survival rate (RFS) were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

The 5-year OSs of the patients were 73.7% in group 1, 67.0% in group 2, and 55.2% in group 3. The 5-year RFSs of the patients were 48.8% in group 1, 64.7% in group 2, and 57.1% in group 3. There were no significant differences in either the OS or the RFS (P = 0.200, P = 0.405).

Conclusion

Starting chemotherapy earlier than 6 weeks after surgery does not show any significant difference. Thus, although adjuvant chemotherapy should preferably begin within 6 weeks, the starting date should not necessarily be hastened, and the patient's general condition should be taken into consideration.