Readmission for dehydration or renal failure after ileostomy creation

Risk factors for postoperative acute kidney injury in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To thoroughly examine the risk factors that may predispose patients with colorectal cancer to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

To find relevant studies (from the beginning up to May 2024), two researchers searched PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the literature using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and extracted data individually. Data analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis included 23 studies, encompassing a total of 167,904 patients. The identified risk factors for postoperative AKI in colorectal cancer patients were male sex, older age, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypoalbuminemia, emergency surgery, open surgery, prolonged operation time, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3, and intraoperative transfusion. In contrast, anemia and elevated creatinine levels did not emerge as significant risk factors for AKI in this population.

CONCLUSION

To mitigate the incidence of postoperative AKI among these patients, healthcare professionals must proactively identify these risk factors and implement appropriate preventive measures.

The Readability, Understandability, and Suitability of Online Resources for Ostomy Care

PURPOSE

the purpose of this study was to evaluate the content, readability, understandability, and suitability of online resources for patient specific ostomy care.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SUBJECT AND SETTING

Online websites for ostomy care designed for patients.

METHODS

Ostomy care websites designed for patients were identified by querying three online search engines. Content areas were established following assessment of all websites by two reviewers. Readability of each website was determined using the Flesch Reading Ease Test and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) index. Understandability was measured using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and suitability was determined using the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM). Chi-Square and rank sum tests were used to compare these measures across website type and by number of content areas.

RESULTS

Twenty-three websites met inclusion criteria; 26.1% were for-profit, 13% were government, 26.1% were academic, and 34.8% were non-profit. Nineteen content areas were identified including themes related to pouching, bathing, physical activity, managing output, lifestyle, mental health, and eating. The median number of content areas covered was 8.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 4-13]. The most common content areas were changing/emptying a pouching system (82.6% of websites), preventing/managing peristomal skin irritation (78.3%), eating (60.9%), and odor management (60.9%). Less than 27% of websites had content on irrigation, blockage/constipation, and body image. Readability scores using the Flesch Reading Ease (mean 58, IQR 54.7-69.5) and SMOG Index (mean 9.1, IQR 7.6-9.9) correlated to a high-school or "fairly difficult" reading level. The mean PEMAT measuring understandability was 80 (IQR 78.9-84.0). The mean SAM score checking for suitability (literacy demand, graphics, layout and type, learning stimulation and motivation and cultural appropriateness) was 55% (IQR 48.4%-61.3%), indicating "adequate material." A greater number of content areas on the websites were associated with worse readability (SMOG and Flesch Reading Ease scores) than websites presenting fewer content areas (P = .001 & P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We found significant variability in the content, readability, understandability, and suitability of online materials for ostomy care. Websites with more content areas were associated with worse readability.

Risk of Kidney Failure in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Undergoing Colectomy: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequently accompanied by kidney complications. Potential triggers or subpopulations at high-risk of kidney problems are not well-elucidated. We hypothesized that surgical interventions, specifically colectomy, might in part explain this risk.

METHODS

This study was a nationwide Swedish cohort study comprising 82,051 individuals with biopsy-proven IBD diagnosed during 1965 to 2017, with follow-up until 2019. We investigated the association between incident colectomy (time-varying exposure) and future risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and kidney failure (diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease or death due to chronic kidney disease) using Cox proportional hazard models. We also examined the impact of partial vs total colectomy and the presence/duration of a stoma. Covariates included demographics, education level, and selected comorbidities.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 14 years, 16,479 individuals underwent colectomy, and 2556 AKI and 1146 kidney failure events occurred. Colectomy was associated with an increased relative risk of both AKI (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 2.17-2.58) and kidney failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.76). Compared with pre-colectomy periods, undergoing total colectomy and colectomy with prolonged stoma showed higher risks of both kidney outcomes versus partial colectomy or colectomy with a temporary stoma, respectively. Subgroup analyses suggested higher risks in patients with ulcerative colitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In people with IBD, rates of AKI and kidney failure are higher among those undergoing colectomy, particularly among those following total colectomy, or colectomy with a prolonged stoma. This study identifies a high-risk population that may benefit from established protocols for kidney function monitoring/surveillance and referral to nephrologist care.

How to dramatically reduce dehydration-related readmission in patients undergoing restorative surgery with diverting ileostomy for ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Patients affected by ulcerative colitis (UC) often require surgery, involving two or three-stage procedures, including ileostomy creation. While ileostomy has some advantages, it can lead to complications, such as dehydration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a new individualized stoma-therapeutic-care-pathway (STCP) on dehydration-related readmissions. Secondary endpoints were stoma-related complications.

METHODS

The study compares two series of consecutive patients with UC undergoing diverting ileostomy during restorative ileo-pouch-anal-anastomosis. The STCP group consists of patients enrolled from January 2020 to December 2021 who followed the pathway. The older group was selected from 2015 to 2017 (control group). Clinical data were collected, including patient characteristics, hospital stay, complications, and readmissions. The study was approved by the local institutional review board.

RESULTS

Overall, 30-day dehydration-related readmission occurred in one (1.4%) versus nine (15.3%) patients in the STCP group versus control group, respectively (p = 0.005). In-hospital peristomal skin complications were significantly lower in STCP group (6 patients, 8.5%) versus control (35, 59.3%), as well as ostomy complications that occurred in 5 (7%) patients in the STCP group versus 8 (13.5%) in the control group (both p < 0.001). Ostomy complications reduced significantly in the STCP group after discharge (two patients, 2.8% versus eight, 13.5%), p = 0.001, and after 30-days (three patients, 4.2% versus five, 8.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the effectiveness of STCP in reducing dehydration-related readmissions and stoma-related complications in patients with UC undergoing stoma creation. It emphasizes the significance of patient education, close follow-up, and multidisciplinary care. Further research and standardized stoma education are essential.

Reducing dehydration-induced readmissions post-colorectal surgery: the impact of a prevention bundle

INTRODUCTION

Ileostomy, frequently created after colorectal resections, hinders the physiologic function of the colon and can lead to dehydration and acute kidney injury due to high stoma outputs. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive measures on ileostomy-induced dehydration and related readmissions in a high-volume unit.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study at a high-volume colorectal surgery department in Turkiye, the Prospective Ileostomy-induced Dehydration Prevention Bundle Project (PIDBP) was assessed from March 2021 to March 2022. The study enrolled patients undergoing colorectal surgery with ileostomy and involved comprehensive inpatient stoma care, education, and a structured post-discharge follow-up. The follow-up included the "Hydration follow-up scale" to monitor ileostomy output and related complications. The primary outcome was the readmission rate due to dehydration-related complications. The patients receiving the bundle intervention were compared with patients treated in the preceding year, focusing on the effectiveness of interventions such as dietary adjustments, fluid therapy, and pharmacological management.

RESULTS

In the study, 104 patients were analyzed, divided into 54 pre-bundle and 50 bundle group patients, with no significant differences in patient characteristics. While the overall readmission rate due to dehydration was 12.5%, a significant reduction in dehydration-related readmissions was observed in the bundle group compared to the pre-bundle group (2% vs. 22%, p = 0.002). Univariate analysis identified high stoma output (> 800 ml/24 h) (p < 0.001), chronic renal failure (CRF) (p = 0.01), postoperative ileus (p = 0.03), higher ASA status (p = 0.04), extended hospital stays (p = 0.03), and small bowel resections (especially in J-pouch patients) (p < 0.001) as significant predictors of readmission. Multivariate analysis revealed that the mean ileostomy output before discharge was the sole significant predictor of dehydration-related readmission (OR 1.01), with an optimal cutoff of 877.5 ml/day identified with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.947, demonstrating high sensitivity (92.3%) and specificity (86.8%) in predicting readmission risk.

CONCLUSION

The Prospective Ileostomy-induced Dehydration Prevention Bundle Project significantly reduced readmission rates after colorectal surgery.

Patient-centred stoma care support: ileostomy patients

Stoma patients require continuous support throughout their entire journey with a stoma. Although many Stoma Care Services across the UK offer patient follow-up pathways, there is not one unified pathway. Patients may not be prepared for life with a stoma because, depending on their stoma type, they will have specific needs, and if patients and healthcare professionals are not prepared to manage these stoma-specific needs, complications and hospital readmissions may occur, worsening patients' outcomes and quality of life. Ileostomy patients are known to be more likely to experience complications, including hospital readmissions, and therefore, special care should be taken when preparing these patients for life with a stoma. They should be informed and educated to prevent complications, and if this is not always possible, thye should at least be able to recognise and manage early signs and symptoms of complications. This will empower them to self-care and know when to seek medical attention.

The impact of delayed closure of ileostomy on postoperative complications in patients with Crohn's disease: a case-matched study

Ileostomy creation is a common procedure to mitigate postoperative complications in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. However, the optimal timing for ileostomy closure remains controversial. This study aims to investigate whether delayed ileostomy closure (> 6 months post formation) affects postoperative complications compared to early closure (≤ 6 months post formation). Consecutive CD patients who underwent ileostomy reversal at a tertiary care center between January 1, 2013, and December 1, 2021, were included. The study compared patients who underwent early ileostomy closure to matched patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure. The 90-day postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The study included 352 eligible patients for ileostomy reversion. Our data showed that patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure had higher incidence of ileostomy-related infectious complications (12% vs. 4%, p = 0.008), a longer postoperative hospital stay (10 days with an IQR of 7-12 days versus 8 days with an IQR of 7-11 days, p = 0.024), and increased rate of ileus (28% versus 15%, p = 0.003). There were 256 patients included after 1:1 propensity score matching. The results revealed no significant differences in postoperative hospital stay, infectious or non-infectious complications except for a statistically significant increase in the incidence of ileus in the delayed closure group (p = 0.01). Patients undergoing delayed ileostomy closure has similar outcomes to early closure in terms of postoperative complications, except for a higher incidence of ileus.

Preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers and diuretics increases the risk of dehydration after ileostomy formation: population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Readmission rates following ileostomy formation are high. Dehydration and consecutive renal failure are common causes of readmission, potentially pronounced by drugs affecting the homeostasis. The aim of the study was to assess the risk of dehydration after ileostomy formation in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) or diuretics.

METHOD

This nationwide population-based cohort study used data derived from the Colorectal Cancer Data Base of several Swedish healthcare registers. The study included all patients operated on with elective anterior resection and temporary ileostomy for rectal cancer clinically staged I-III in Sweden in 2007-2016. Exposure was at least two dispensations of ACEI, ARB or diuretics within 1 year prior to surgery. Outcome was 90-day readmission due to dehydration including acute renal failure.

RESULTS

In total, 3252 patients were included with 1173 (36.1%) exposed to ACEI, ARB or diuretics. The cumulative incidence for 90-day readmission due to dehydration was 29.0% (151 of 520) for exposed versus 13.8% (98 of 712) for unexposed. The proportion of readmissions due to any reason was 44.3% (520 of 1173) for exposed compared to 34.2% (712 of 2079) for unexposed. The incidence rate ratio for readmission due to dehydration was 2.83 (95% c.i. 2.21 to 3.63, P < 0.001). The hazard rate ratio was 2.45 (95% c.i. 1.83 to 3.27, P < 0.001) after adjusting for age, gender and comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

Medication with ACEI, ARB or diuretics defines a vulnerable patient group with increased risk of readmission due to dehydration after ileostomy formation.

Management of adult intestinal stomas: The 2023 French guidelines

AIM

Digestive stoma are frequently performed. The last French guidelines have been published twenty years ago. Our aim was to update French clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative management of digestive stoma and stoma-related complications.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of French and English articles published between January 2000 and May 2022 was performed. Only digestive stoma for fecal evacuation in adults were considered. Stoma in children, urinary stoma, digestive stoma for enteral nutrition, and rare stoma (Koch, perineal) were not included.

RESULTS

Guidelines include the surgical landmarks to create digestive stoma (ideal location, mucocutaneous anastomosis, utility of support rods, use of prophylactic mesh), the perioperative clinical practice guidelines (patient education, preoperative ostomy site marking, postoperative equipment, prescriptions, and follow-up), the management of early stoma-related complications (difficulties for nursing, high output, stoma necrosis, retraction, abscess and peristomal skin complications), and the management of late stoma-related complications (stoma prolapse, parastomal hernia, stoma stenosis, late stoma retraction). A level of evidence was assigned to each statement.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines will be very useful in clinical practice, and allow to delete some outdated dogma.

Metabolic and Nutritional Issues after Lower Digestive Tract Surgery: The Important Role of the Dietitian in a Multidisciplinary Setting

Many patients undergo small bowel and colon surgery for reasons related to malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), mesenteric ischemia, and other benign conditions, including post-operative adhesions, hernias, trauma, volvulus, or diverticula. Some patients arrive in the operating theatre severely malnourished due to an underlying disease, while others develop complications (e.g., anastomotic leaks, abscesses, or strictures) that induce a systemic inflammatory response that can increase their energy and protein requirements. Finally, anatomical and functional changes resulting from surgery can affect either nutritional status due to malabsorption or nutritional support (NS) pathways. The dietitian providing NS to these patients needs to understand the pathophysiology underlying these sequelae and collaborate with other professionals, including surgeons, internists, nurses, and pharmacists. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the nutritional and metabolic consequences of different types of lower gastrointestinal surgery and the role of the dietitian in providing comprehensive patient care. This article reviews the effects of small bowel resection on macronutrient and micronutrient absorption, the effects of colectomies (e.g., ileocolectomy, low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy) that require special dietary considerations, nutritional considerations specific to ostomized patients, and clinical practice guidelines for caregivers of patients who have undergone a surgery for local and systemic complications of IBD. Finally, we highlight the valuable contribution of the dietitian in the challenging management of short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure.

Nutritional Considerations in Colorectal Surgery in Diverting Ileostomy Patients: A Review

Colorectal surgery often results in a temporary or permanent ileostomy construction. The general nutritional status and intake of patients with an ileostomy have not received much attention and scientific evidence is lacking. Nutritional complications associated with ileostomy formation and colonic exclusion include fluid (dehydration) and electrolyte abnormalities (mainly hyponatremia), impaired renal function occurring from plasma volume depletion, and reduced energy absorption due to the role of the large bowel in energy assimilation. People with ileostomies frequently avoid specific foods, due to concerns of possible malfunction or food blockages of their stoma, which may produce a negative effect on their overall dietary intake and nutritional status. The present article reviews the existing literature on nutritional considerations for those with an ileostomy and discusses measures to optimize overall nutritional status of this category of patients.

Complications and Healthcare Costs Associated With the First Year Following Colostomy and Ileostomy Formation: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes during the first year following ostomy formation.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective audit.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

The sample comprised 200 patients who underwent surgery leading to ileostomy or colostomy at a large English National Health Service (NHS) Trust.

METHODS

Clinical complications, medicine prescriptions, and interactions with healthcare services were reported over 12 months postsurgery, and interactions with the NHS were matched to the closest NHS unit cost to determine mean patient cost.

RESULTS

The most common ostomy-related surgical site complications were high output (35.0%; n = 70), followed by moderate/severe peristomal skin complications (24.5%; n = 49) and bleeding (23.5%; n = 47). Ostomy management-related complications included general difficulties with ostomy management (50.0%; n = 100) and leakage-related mild peristomal skin issues (48.5%; n = 97). Clinical complication rates were highest in the first quarter following ostomy formation, except parastomal hernia, which increased in incidence over time. Ileostomy patients more frequently experienced high output, acute renal failure, and ostomy management-related complications and had increased length of inpatient admission. However, healthcare resource use was high in both groups, with a median of 13 inpatient admission days and 12 outpatient contacts overall within the first year. Mean cost per patient was £20,444.60 (US $26,018.41); 90.5% of these costs were attributed to ostomy-related factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are likely to experience at least one clinical complication following intestinal ostomy formation and have multiple interactions with the NHS. While a number of complications are more frequent in patients with ileostomies, both groups experienced considerable costs within the first year following surgery associated with ostomy management and recovery.

Redo Ileocolic Resection Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Anastomotic Leak in Recurrent Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Redo ileocolic resection for recurrent Crohn's disease is associated with increased technical complexity and higher complication rates compared to primary resection. Literature concerning redo surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease is scarce and it is controversial whether a redo is a risk factor for postoperative anastomotic leak.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to hypothesized that redo ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease is an independent risk factor for anastomotic leak.

DESIGN

Retrospective, case-control study from 1994 to 2019 with multivariate analysis and propensity score weighting.

SETTING

Quaternary, IBD-referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients aged >18 years were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Primary or redo ileocolic resection with an anastomosis, with or without diverting ileostomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Thirty-day anastomotic leak rate.

RESULTS

A total of 991 patients (56% primary and 44% redo ileocolic resections) were included. Patients who underwent redo resection were significantly older with more comorbidities, fewer medications, and less fistulizing disease compared to the primary group. On univariate analysis, patients who underwent redo resection had more overall complications (50.5% vs 36.2%, p < 0.001), and the cumulative number of prior ileocolic resections was significantly associated with increased risk for overall morbidity ( p < 0.001). There were 31 (3%) anastomotic leaks; leak rates did not differ between groups ( p = 0.60). Multivariable analysis indicated that extensive adhesiolysis ( p < 0.001), ileostomy omission ( p = 0.009), and intraoperative abscess/fistula ( p = 0.02) were independently associated with leaks but not redo resection ( p = 0.27). Patients with 0, 1, 2, or 3 of these risk factors had observed leak rates of 1.1%, 1.3%, 6.0%, and 11.6.% ( p = 0.03), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this study were selection bias, referral bias, and single quaternary center.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to primary procedures, redo ileocolic resection for recurrent Crohn's disease is associated with increased overall morbidity but not anastomotic leak. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C132 .

LA RESECCIN ILEOCLICA REHECHA NO ES UN FACTOR DE RIESGO INDEPENDIENTE DE FUGA ANASTOMTICA EN LA ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN RECURRENTE

ANTECEDENTES:La resección ileocólica para la enfermedad de Crohn recurrente se asocia con una mayor complejidad técnica y mayores tasas de complicaciones en comparación con la resección primaria. La literatura sobre la reintervención quirúrgica para la enfermedad de Crohn recurrente es escasa y es controvertido si una redo es un factor de riesgo para la fuga anastomótica posoperatoria.OBJETIVO:Tenemos la hipótesis de que rehacer la resección ileocólica para la enfermedad de Crohn es un factor de riesgo independiente para la fuga anastomótica.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles de 1994 a 2019 con análisis multivariado y ponderación de puntuación de propensión.AJUSTE:Centro de referencia de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal de cuarto nivel.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos >18 años.INTERVENCIONES:Resección ileocólica primaria o rehecha con una anastomosis, con o sin derivación de ileostomía.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Tasa de fuga anastomótica a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 991 pacientes (56% resecciones primarias y 44% resecciones ileocólicas rehechas). Los pacientes de reintervención eran significativamente mayores con más comorbilidades, menos medicamentos y menos enfermedad fistulizante en comparación con el grupo primario. En el análisis univariado, los pacientes reoperados tuvieron más complicaciones generales (50,5% frente a 36,2%, p < 0,001) y el número acumulado de resecciones ileocólicas previas se asoció significativamente con un mayor riesgo de morbilidad general ( p < 0,001). Hubo 31 (3%) fugas anastomóticas; las tasas de fuga no difirieron entre los grupos ( p = 0,6). El análisis multivariado indicó que la adhesiolisis extensa ( p < 0,001), la omisión de ileostomía ( p = 0,009) y el absceso/fístula intraoperatorios ( p = 0,02) se asociaron de forma independiente con fugas, pero no con nueva resección ( p = 0,27). Los pacientes con 0, 1, 2 o 3 de estos factores de riesgo observaron tasas de fuga del 1,1%, 1,3%, 6,0% y 11,6% ( p = 0,03), respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de selección, Sesgo de referencia, un centro de cuarto nivelCONCLUSIÓN:En comparación con los procedimientos primarios, la resección ileocólica para la enfermedad de Crohn recurrente se asocia con una mayor morbilidad general, pero no con una fuga anastomótica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C132 . (Traducción-Dr. Mauricio Santamaria ).

Impact of ileostomy in the adjuvant treatment and outcome of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

After tumor resection, a preventive diverting loop ileostomy creation is a routine surgical procedure to prevent anastomotic leakage and infections and to preclude secondary surgeries. Despite its benefits, several studies have proposed potential complications that extend the disease course by impairing the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy and adherence.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ileostomy complications on the adherence to adjuvant treatment and overall survival (OS) of colon cancer (CC) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study. Patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma were treated between January 2010 and December 2020 at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

χ² and t-test, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and Cox regression. Statistical significance differences were assessed when p was bilaterally < 0.05.

RESULTS

The most frequent complications of loop-derived ileostomy were hydro-electrolytic dehydration (50%), acute kidney injury (AKI) (26%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (28%), and grade 3-4 diarrhea (21%) (p = 0.001). Patients with complete chemotherapy did not reach the median OS. In contrast, the median OS for patients with non-complete chemotherapy was 56 months (p = 0.023). Additionally, 5-year OS reached to 100% in the early restitution group, 85% in the late restitution group, and 60% in the non-restitution group (p = 0.016). Finally, AKI (p = 0.029; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.348 [1.133-9.895]), complete chemotherapy (p = 0.028; 95% CI 0.376 [0.105-0.940]), and reversed ileostomy (p = 0.001; 95% CI 0.125 [0.038-0.407]) remained as predictors of overall survival for patients with CC treated with a loop ileostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results emphasize the early stoma reversal restitution as a safe and feasible alternative to prevent severe complications related to ileostomies which improve chemotherapy adherence and overall survival of colon cancer patients. This is one of the pioneer studies analyzing the impact of ileostomy on treatment adherence and outcome of Latin American patients with colon cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospective study No. 2021/045, in April 2021.

Risk factors of acute renal failure in patients with protective ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite the potential benefits of protective ileostomy in rectal surgery, diverting loop ileostomy construction is not free of specific medical consequences implying unplanned hospital readmissions. The most common reason for readmission in these patients is a dehydration with a prevalence of acute renal failure (ARF) of 20%. The objective of this study was to establish the predictive factors of ARF in patients with protective ileostomy after surgery for rectal cancer from a bicentric study.

METHODS

we conducted a bicentric retrospective cohort study to identify the risk factor of ARF. This study was carried out on 277 patients operated for rectal cancer with necessity of a protective ileostomy during the study period. ARF was measured at any endpoint between ileostomy creation and reversal. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to identify independent risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients were included, and 18% (n = 50) were readmitted for ARF. In multivariate logistic regression, increased age (OR 1.02, p = 0.01), Psychiatric diseases (OR 4.33, p = 0.014), Angiotensin II receptor blockers (OR 5.15, p < 0.001) and the ASA score ≥ 3 (OR 9.5, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with ARF.

CONCLUSION

Acute renal failure is a prevalent and significant event in the postoperative course of ileostomy patients. Patients at risk should be risk stratified before discharge and targeted for intensive preventive measures.

Outcomes of Partial Versus Total Colectomy in Ulcerative Colitis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Total abdominal colectomy (TAC) with ileostomy is the standard treatment for severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Partial colectomy (PC) with colostomy may present a less morbid treatment option.

METHODS

The 2012-19 ACS-NSQIP database was queried to assess 30-day outcomes among patients undergoing TAC versus PC for UC, utilizing propensity score matching (PSM) techniques to account for differences in disease severity, patient selection, and presentation acuity.

RESULTS

Before matching (n = 9888), patients undergoing PC were older, had more comorbidities, and experienced higher complication and 30-day mortality rates (P < 0.001). After matching (n = 1846), patients undergoing TAC experienced higher 30-day overall complications (41.9% versus 36.5%, P = 0.017) and serious complications (37.2% versus 31.5%, P = 0.011). Sensitivity analyses of older patients and those undergoing nonemergency surgery demonstrated higher overall rates of complications for patients receiving TAC. However, among patients undergoing emergency surgery only, no differences in complications were seen between the two surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

PC with colostomy in the setting of ulcerative colitis has similar 30-day outcomes to TAC with ileostomy. PC may be an acceptable surgical alternative to TAC in select patients. Studies investigating longer-term outcomes are necessary to further investigate this option.

Renal dysfunction occurs following ileostomy formation and is independent of readmission

BACKGROUND

Ileostomy formation may be permanent or intended as temporary to defunction a high-risk pelvic anastomosis to reduce the risk of septic consequences of anastomotic leak. However, these procedures have a high rate of readmission, most commonly due to dehydration and associated with acute kidney injury (AKI).

METHODS

A single centre retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent ileostomy formation from 2015 to 2020 and analysed in two groups: those who needed readmission within 60 days and those who did not. Data collected included demographics and renal function and electrolytes at baseline (ileostomy formation) and at elective ileostomy closure.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were included in the analysis, with a readmission rate 38% within 60 days of discharge. There was a significant increase in creatinine from baseline blood tests compared to date of elective ileostomy closure in both the readmission and no readmission arms. There was a significant decrease in eGFR from baseline blood tests compared with date of ileostomy closure in both readmission and no readmission arms. There was no significant difference in creatinine or eGFR between readmission and no readmission arms at date of ileostomy closure. Baseline serum sodium levels were lower in the readmission arm compared to no readmission arm.

CONCLUSION

Ileostomy formation is associated with a deterioration in renal function, which occurs independent of whether the patient requires readmission to hospital. Low serum sodium may be used as a predictor for patients with an increased risk of readmission.

Readmission with acute kidney injury following ileostomy: patterns and predictors of a common phenomenon

PURPOSE

Ileostomy is associated with various complications, often necessitating rehospitalization. High-output ileostomy is common and may lead to acute kidney injury (AKI). Here we describe the temporal pattern of readmission with AKI following ileostomy formation and identify risk factors.

METHODS

Patients that underwent formation of ileostomy between 2008 and 2021 were included in this study. Readmission with AKI with high output ileostomy was defined as readmission with serum creatinine > 1.5-fold compared to the level at discharge or latest baseline (at least stage-1 AKI according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) criteria), accompanied by ileostomy output > 1000 ml in 24 h. Patient characteristics and perioperative course were assessed to identify predictors for readmission with AKI.

RESULTS

Of 1191 patients who underwent ileostomy, 198 (16.6%) were readmitted with a high output stoma and AKI. The mean time to readmission with AKI was 98.97 ± 156.36 days. Eighty-six patients (43.4%) had early readmission (within 30 days), and 66 (33%) were readmitted after more than 90 days. Over 90% of patients had more than one readmission, and 110 patients (55%) had 5 or more. Patient-related predictors for readmission with AKI were age > 65, body mass index > 30 kg/m2, and hypertension. Factors related to the postoperative course were AKI with creatinine > 2 mg/dl, postoperative hemoglobin < 8 g/dl or blood transfusion, albumin < 20 g/dl, high output stoma and need for loperamide, and length of hospital stay > 20 days. Factors related to early versus late readmissions and multiple readmissions were also analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission with AKI following ileostomy formation is a consequential event with distinct risk factors. Acknowledging these risk factors is the foundation for designing interventions aiming to reduce frequency of AKI readmissions in predisposed patient populations.

[Prognostic factors of dehydration and renal damage in patients with formed preventive ileostomy during rectal resection for cancer]

Despite the potential advantages of a preventive intestinal stoma after the formation of a low colon anastomosis during rectal resections, the formation of a preventive loop ileostomy is associated with a significant frequency of complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential prognostic factors of complications associated with ileostomy dysfunction in patients who have undergone rectal resection for cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients over the age of 18 who underwent open and laparoscopic resection of the rectum with the formation of a preventive ileostomy from January 2015 to May 2022. To determine the influence of potential predictors on the frequency of complications associated with large ileostomy losses, a single-factor logistic regression analysis was used. Complications associated with large ileostomy losses were primarily water-electrolyte disorders, dehydration and acute renal failure, which required intensive therapy and re-hospitalization.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients included in the study, 26 (21.7%) suffered complications associated with large losses of fluid and electrolytes in the stoma. In this group of patients, at least one repeated emergency hospitalization to a medical institution was required (average value 1.6). Factors associated with ileostomy dysfunction in a single-factor analysis were: the presence of signs of intestinal obstruction (OR=2.6; p=0.047), the development of postoperative complications (OR=3; p=0.024), steroid use (OR=4.3; p=0.010), smoking (OR=4.8; p=0.017) the average amount of discharge from the stoma at discharge is more than 1000 ml/24 h (OR=3.2; p=0.016) and the need for Loperamide at the time of discharge (OR=2.8; p=0.032). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed an independent risk factor for complications leading to re-hospitalization: ileostomy losses at discharge ≥1000 ml/24 h (OR=3.3 (1.18-9.37); p=0.023).

CONCLUSION

In our study, those patients whose ileostomy discharge exceeded 1000 ml/24 h at discharge were at increased risk of dehydration, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, acute prerenal renal failure, which led to repeated hospitalization to correct these disorders, sometimes in the intensive care unit.

Risk factors associated with readmission within 30 days following stoma surgery: Development of a 'traffic light' prediction model

AIM

Patients undergoing stoma surgery have a higher risk for early readmission. Some patients may benefit from closer postdischarge surveillance to provide early detection of complications and timely intervention. However, there is a paucity of validated tools to identify those at higher risk of readmission. Here, we aim to determine the independent risk factors associated with readmission within 30 days of discharge following stoma surgery, attempt to validate previous predictive models and develop a novel prediction tool.

METHOD

A retrospective review of 423 patients who underwent ileostomy or colostomy stoma formation at a UK tertiary colorectal centre between 2019 and 2021. Univariate, multivariate and logistic regression analyses were used to analyse a large number of demographics and risk factors and the association with readmission.

RESULTS

This study cohort included 220 ileostomy and 203 colostomy patients. Of these, 87 (20.6%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge following index surgery. A large number of demographics were evaluated for association with readmission. Readmission was associated with chronic heart failure (p < 0.05), postoperative stoma-specific complications (bleeding, p = 0.02; high-output stoma, p = 0.01) and those with a loop ileostomy (34.0% vs. 18.6%; p = 0.01). A previous predictive model was ineffective in this cohort, therefore a simplified 'traffic light' risk scoring system was developed and found to have improved discrimination.

CONCLUSION

Readmission following stoma formation is associated with key variables that could provide the means to triage, risk score and potentially predict readmissions. We found that a novel and simplified scoring system may provide improved prediction.

Colectomy Complicated by High-Output Ileostomy Managed in a Virtual Hybrid Hospital-at-Home Program

Chronically ill patients with superimposed acute illness requiring hospitalization are more likely to develop an extended length of stay, hospital-acquired infections, and adverse events throughout their hospitalization. An excellent alternative to managing this population of patients in the traditional bricks-and-mortal (BAM) hospital is the hospital-at-home (HaH) model. The Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program is Mayo Clinic's HaH model that provides acute and postacute care to high-acuity patients in their homes rather than in the traditional hospital and skilled nursing facility. We report a case of postoperative care through the ACH program of a patient suffering from short gut syndrome, high-output ileostomy, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition in the setting of previously diagnosed triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the right breast complicated by lung and brain metastasis. The patient had multiple complications that required repeated scare escalations directed by a multidisciplinary virtual care. Despite these complications, the ACH model of care was able to keep the patient in the home setting the majority of the time, limiting BAM hospital days, and eliminating the need to use the emergency department for acute escalation for 3 months. The patient was able to recover during this time period and proceed to successful take-down of the ileostomy. This case highlights the benefits of the ACH program by offering high-acuity hospital-level care to severely ill patients in the comfort of their homes. Highly qualified providers paired with curated technology in the home allowed for prompt identification of patient decompensation and timely initiation of treatment while avoiding institutionalization.

From Formation to Closure: Aggregate Morbidity and Mortality Associated With Defunctioning Loop Ileostomies

BACKGROUND

Defunctioning loop ileostomies are used commonly, but there are significant morbidities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the morbidity and mortality associated with the formation and closure of defunctioning loop ileostomies.

DESIGN

This descriptive study is based on electronic health records and claims data.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at academic and community hospitals in Ontario, Canada.

PATIENTS

Adult patients who had a low anterior resection with concurrent defunctioning loop ileostomy from 2002 to 2014 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes of interest included 30-day major complications, acute kidney injury, transfusion, and deep space infection. The rate of ileostomy reversal and the percentage of permanent ostomies were also collected.

RESULTS

The cohort consists of 4658 patients who underwent low anterior resection with concurrent defunctioning loop ileostomy. The 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality rates of these patients were 1.2%, 2.2%, and 5.1%. The rate of reoperation was 5.5%, the rate of hospital readmission was 13.4%, the rate of major complications was 28.5%, the rate of deep organ/space infection requiring percutaneous intervention was 5.2%, and the rate of acute kidney injury requiring hospitalization was 10.4%. Eighty-six percent had their ileostomy reversed, leaving 13.2% with a permanent ostomy. After ileostomy reversal, 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 0.6% and 0.9%. The rate of major complications was 10.3%, bowel obstruction 7%, ventral hernia 10.5%, deep space infection 1.7%, and repeat operation 2.3%.

LIMITATIONS

This study is based on electronic health records and claims data and, thus, the accuracy of results depends on the accuracy of data administration' which can be variable across institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidity and mortality of defunctioning loop ileostomies are significant. One in 8 patients will have a permanent ostomy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B810 .

DESDE LA FORMACIN HASTA EL CIERRE AGREGADA MORBILIDAD Y MORTALIDAD ASOCIADA CON LAS ILEOSTOMAS EN ASA DERIVATIVA

ANTECEDENTES:Las ileostomías en asa derivativa se utilizan con frecuencia, pero existen morbilidades importantes.OBJETIVO:Describir la morbilidad y mortalidad asociadas con la formación y cierre de ileostomías en asa derivativa.DISEÑO:Estudio descriptivo basado en historias clínicas electrónicas y datos de reclamaciones.ENTORNO CLINICO:Hospitales académicos y comunitarios en Ontario, Canadá.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos sometidos a resección anterior baja con concurrente ileostomía en asa derivativa de 2002 a 2014.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Los resultados de interés incluyeron complicaciones mayores a los 30 días, lesión renal aguda, transfusión e infección del espacio profundo. También se recolectó la tasa de reversión de la ileostomía y el porcentaje de ostomías permanentes.RESULTADOS:La cohorte consistió de 4658 pacientes sometidos a resección anterior baja con concurrente ileostomía en asa derivativa. La mortalidad de estos pacientes, a treinta días, 90 días y un año, fue del 1,2%, 2,2% y 5,1%, respectivamente. La tasa de reintervención fue del 5,5%, el reingreso hospitalario fue del 13,4%, la complicación mayor fue del 28,5%, la infección profunda de órganos / espacios que requirieron intervención percutánea fue del 5,2%, y la lesión renal aguda que requirió hospitalización fue del 10,4%. Ochenta y seis por ciento tuvieron reversión de su ileostomía, dejando al 13.2% con una ostomía permanente. Después de la reversión de la ileostomía, la mortalidad a los 30 días y 90 días fue de 0,6% y 0,9%, respectivamente. La tasa de complicaciones mayores fue del 10,3%, obstrucción intestinal del 7%, hernia ventral del 10,5%, infección del espacio profundo del 1,7% y reintervención del 2,3%.LIMITACIONES:El estudio se basa en registros médicos electrónicos y datos de reclamos y, por lo tanto, la precisión de los resultados depende de la precisión en la administración de datos, que pueden variar entre instituciones.CONCLUSIONES:La morbilidad y la mortalidad de las ileostomías en asa derivativa son significativas. Uno de cada 8 pacientes tendrá una ostomía permanente. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B810 . (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).

Diverting ileostomy is a risk factor for renal impairment during CAPOX therapy

PURPOSE

Temporary ileostomy is sometimes created after colorectal surgery and may cause renal impairment. However, the impact of ileostomy on renal function during adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of ileostomy on renal function during adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We examined 184 patients who received adjuvant CAPOX therapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) for CRC with or without ileostomy between January 2011 and December 2020 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. Clinicopathological factors, including renal function, were retrospectively reviewed in association with temporary ileostomy. Factors associated with reductions in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during CAPOX therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (10%) underwent temporary ileostomy. The maximum decrease in eGFR during CAPOX therapy was significantly higher in patients with than in those without ileostomy (- 16.1 vs. - 5.6 mL/min/1.73m², p = 0.003). A multivariate analysis identified ileostomy as one of factors independently associated with reductions in eGFR during CAPOX therapy (p = 0.003). The cumulative number of readmission due to dehydration was also higher in patients with ileostomy (33% vs. 1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ileostomy significantly reduced eGFR during adjuvant CAPOX therapy. Therefore, renal function needs to be monitored during CAPOX therapy, particularly in patients with ileostomy.

Overall readmissions and readmissions related to dehydration after creation of an ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hospital readmissions after creation of an ileostomy are common and come with a high clinical and financial burden. The aim of this review with pooled analysis was to determine the incidence of dehydration-related and all-cause readmissions after formation of an ileostomy, and the associated costs.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted for studies reporting on dehydration-related and overall readmission rates after formation of a loop or end ileostomy between January 1990 and April 2021. Analyses were performed using R Statistical Software Version 3.6.1.

Results

The search yielded 71 studies (n = 82,451 patients). The pooled incidence of readmissions due to dehydration was 6% (95% CI 0.04–0.09) within 30 days, with an all-cause readmission rate of 20% (CI 95% 0.18–0.23). Duration of readmissions for dehydration ranged from 2.5 to 9 days. Average costs of dehydration-related readmission were between $2750 and $5924 per patient. Other indications for readmission within 30 days were specified in 15 studies, with a pooled incidence of 5% (95% CI 0.02–0.14) for dehydration, 4% (95% CI 0.02–0.08) for stoma outlet problems, and 4% (95% CI 0.02–0.09) for infections.

Conclusions

One in five patients are readmitted with a stoma-related complication within 30 days of creation of an ileostomy. Dehydration is the leading cause for these readmissions, occurring in 6% of all patients within 30 days. This comes with high health care cost for a potentially avoidable cause. Better monitoring, patient awareness and preventive measures are required.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-022-02580-6.

Acute kidney injury is a common and significant complication following ileostomy formation

AIM

The aim was to characterize the incidence and short-term prognostic value of an acute kidney injury (AKI) during the admission where an ileostomy is formed.

METHODS

Adults with a baseline serum creatinine measurement discharged alive after ileostomy formation from 2014 to 2016 were included. All patients had daily basic metabolic panels and the Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcomes criteria were used to determine the presence and severity of any AKI. Dehydration was defined by a single urine abnormality or clinical criteria combined with an objective abnormality in vitals or basic metabolic panels.

RESULTS

Of 262 patients, 19.4% sustained an AKI (74.5% Stage I, 15.7% Stage II, 9.8% Stage III) during the index admission. Predictors of incident AKI were increasing age, male sex, higher baseline creatinine and open surgery. Patients with AKI had significantly longer length of stay and 45% had creatinine <1.0 mg/dl at discharge. Of the total cohort, 11% were readmitted with dehydration and the independent predictors were AKI during the index admission, high ileostomy output, age >65 years, male sex and prior ileostomy. Of those readmitted with dehydration, 79% had AKI at readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 20% of patients with ileostomies develop an AKI during the index admission with almost half resolving by discharge. Patients with AKIs are at high risk for 30-day dehydration-related readmission and AKI is present in nearly 80% of those readmitted with dehydration. Since AKI is objective, based on routine laboratory measures, and has known prognostic value it is probably a more robust outcome than dehydration for researchers, surgeons and patients.

Outcomes on diverting ostomy formation and reversal after low anterior resection in the older more advanced rectal cancer patient

BACKGROUND

To decrease morbidity caused by anastomotic leakages after a low anterior resection (LAR) with primary anastomosis, a diverting ostomy is often created. Reversal of a diverting ostomy is associated with morbidity, which may result in non-reversal, particularly in the elderly. This study aimed to describe the diverting ostomy-related outcomes in elderly patients with more advanced rectal cancer after LAR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All rectosigmoid and rectal cancer patients ≥70 years who underwent LAR with primary anastomosis between 2006 and 2019 in the Catharina Hospital (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were included for analyses. Reversal rates, ostomy-related complications, morbidity and mortality after ostomy reversal, and definitive ostomy rates were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total 164 patients were included, of which 150 (91.5%) underwent primary or secondary ostomy creation. Ostomy-related complications were reported in 34.7% (95%-CI 27.1-42.9%). In total, 72.5% (95%-CI 64.2-79.7%) reversed their diverting ostomy. Non-reversal was mostly due to relapsing disease (52.6%). Median time to ostomy reversal was 3.2 months (IQR 2.3-5.0). No or minor complications after ostomy reversal were observed in 84.0% (95%-CI 75.3-90.6%). Over time, ostomy recreation was performed in 15.0% (95%-CI 8.6-23.5%), and ultimately 65.8% (95%-CI 57.8-73.2%) were ostomy-free after the median follow-up of 3.8 years.

CONCLUSION

Although most elderly successfully reversed their diverting ostomy after LAR with limited morbidity, attention should be paid for the risk of non-reversal and ostomy recreation over time. Preoperative patient counselling is important in every individual to be able to decide if LAR with primary anastomosis or a permanent end colostomy is preferred.

Perioperative Morbidity and Complications in Patients With an Established Ileostomy Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Background: Recently formed ileostomies may produce an average of 1,200 ml of watery stool per day, while an established ileostomy output varies between 600-800 ml per day. The reported incidence of renal impartment in patients with ileostomy is 8-20%, which could be caused by dehydration (up to 50%) or high output stoma (up to 40%). There is a lack of evidence if an ileostomy could influence perioperative fluid management and/or surgical outcomes. Methods: Subjects aged ≥18 years old with an established ileostomy scheduled to undergo an elective non-ileostomy-related major abdominal surgery under general anesthesia lasting more than 2 h and requiring hospitalization were included in the study. The primary outcome was to assess the incidence of perioperative complications within 30 days after surgery. Results: A total of 552 potential subjects who underwent non-ileostomy-related abdominal surgery were screened, but only 12 were included in the statistical analysis. In our study cohort, 66.7% of the subjects were men and the median age was 56 years old (interquartile range [IQR] 48-59). The median time from the creation of ileostomy to the qualifying surgery was 17.7 months (IQR: 8.3, 32.6). The most prevalent comorbidities in the study group were psychiatric disorders (58.3%), hypertension (50%), and cardiovascular disease (41.7%). The most predominant surgical approach was open (8 [67%]). The median surgical and anesthesia length was 3.4 h (IQR: 2.5, 5.7) and 4 h (IQR: 3, 6.5), respectively. The median post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay was 2 h (IQR:0.9, 3.1), while the median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 5.6 days (IQR: 4.1, 10.6). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 50% (n = 6). Two subjects (16.7%) had a moderate surgical wound infection, and two subjects (16.7%) experienced a mild surgical wound infection. In addition, one subject (7.6%) developed a major postoperative complication with atrial fibrillation in conjunction with moderate hemorrhage. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the presence of a well-established ileostomy might not represent a relevant risk factor for significant perioperative complications related to fluid management or hospital readmission. However, the presence of peristomal skin complications could trigger a higher incidence of surgical wound infections.

Hydration by colonic enteroclysis: An alternative to parenteral hydration in patients with high-output double enterostomy

BACKGROUND

High-output double enterostomies (DESs) result in sodium and fluid loss responsible for frequent episodes of dehydration and hospitalizations. Hydration by enteroclysis (HE) is an alternative to parenteral hydration when the small bowel, or the downstream colon, is accessible and functional.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all consecutive patients admitted in our institution with high-output (≥1200 ml per 24 h) DES and access to downstream intestine (including colon), who were treated by enteroclysis between 2015 and 2019. A sodium chloride and bicarbonate solution was instilled through a tube inserted in the colon. The objectives were diuresis >1 L, natriuresis >40 mmol/24 h, and urinary sodium-to-potassium ratio >1.

RESULTS

HE was conducted in 52 patients (24 female, 28 male). Initially, 30 patients received intravenous support. Fifteen patients (50%) were weaned from all parenteral support, of whom 11 of 12 (92%) received fluid and electrolyte support and 4 of 18 (22%) received parenteral nutrition (PN). When intravenous fluids were still required, daily volumes decreased from 2714 ± 1424 to 1578 ± 1000 ml per 24 h (P = .001), as did the energetic intake (NS), from 1439 ± 556 to 1230 ± 362 kcal per 24 h (P = .096).

CONCLUSION

HE through the efferent intestine limits the requirement for parenteral hydration in patients with high-output DES. For patients with intestinal failure dependent on PN, it reduces daily infused volumes.

Patient-Related Factors Associated With Stoma and Peristomal Complications Following Fecal Ostomy Surgery: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

Ostomy creation is often an integral part of the surgical management of various diseases including colorectal malignancies and inflammatory bowel disease. Stoma and peristomal complications may occur in up to 70% of patients following ostomy surgery. The aim of this scoping literature review was to synthesize evidence on the risk factors for developing complications following creation of a fecal ostomy.

DESIGN

Scoping literature review.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Two independent researchers completed a search of the online bibliographic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and EMBASE for all articles published between January 1980 and December 2018. The search comprised multiple elements including systematic literature reviews with meta-analysis of pooled findings, randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, observational studies, other types of review articles, and multiple case reports. We screened 307 unique titles and abstracts; 68 articles met our eligibility criteria for inclusion. The methodological rigor of study quality included in our scoping review was variable.

FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS

We identified 6 risk factors associated with an increased likelihood of stoma or peristomal complications (1) age more than 65 years; (2) female sex; (3) body mass index more than 25; (4) diabetes mellitus as a comorbid condition; (5) abdominal malignancy as the underlying reason for ostomy surgery; and (6) lack of preoperative stoma site marking and WOC/ostomy nurse specialist care prior to stoma surgery. We also found evidence that persons with a colostomy are at a higher risk for prolapse and parastomal hernia.

IMPLICATIONS

Health care professionals should consider these risk factors when caring for patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery and manage modifiable factors whenever possible. For example, preoperative stoma site marking by an ostomy nurse or surgeon familiar with this task, along with careful perioperative ostomy care and education of the patient by an ostomy nurse specialist, are essential to reduce the risk of modifiable risk factors related to creation of a fecal ostomy.

Loop-ileostomy reversal in a 23-h stay setting is safe with high patient satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine whether day-case closure of loop ileostomy with discharge within 23 h was both feasible and accepted by patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective pilot study where selected rectal cancer patients with diverting loop ileostomy underwent stoma closure in a 23-h stay setting. Patients were followed up on the third, seventh, and 30th postoperative day and phoned daily during the first week. A comparable group of 30 patients who underwent standard in-hospital stoma closure prior to the start of the study were selected retrospectively as historical controls.

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 41-79 years) were included. All patients met discharge criteria and were discharged within 23 h of surgery, except one. In total, seven patients (23%) were admitted. Two of these patients underwent laparotomy because of anastomotic leakage and small bowel obstruction, respectively. The mean total length of stay was 1.7 days. Most patients (87%) were satisfied with the treatment without feeling neglected or anxious and preferred the 23-h stay setting. In the control group, the mean length of stay was 5 days. Seven patients (23%) were readmitted. Two of these patients underwent laparotomy because of small bowel obstruction and abscess, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ileostomy closure in a 23-h stay setting in selected patients with meticulous follow up is feasible and safe with high patient satisfaction.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER

(NCT02774447).

New Ileostomy Formation and Subsequent Community-onset Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Population-based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine relationships between ileostomy formation and subsequent kidney disease.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

Colonic absorptive capacity loss from ileostomy formation can cause volume depletion and could result in kidney disease.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based cohort study comparing patients who underwent ileostomy formation with or without bowel resection (ileostomy group) to patients who underwent bowel resection without ileostomy formation (reference group). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for community-onset acute kidney injury (AKI) within 3 months and new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) within 1 year following hospital discharge were determined.

RESULTS

Among 19,889 patients, 4136 comprised the ileostomy group and 15,753 comprised the reference group; 1350 patients experienced community-onset AKI and 464 developed new-onset CKD. The aOR for community-onset AKI with ileostomy formation was 4.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.62-4.61] for any stage AKI, 7.08 (95% CI = 5.66-8.85) for stage ≥2 injury, and 7.67 (95% CI = 5.06-11.63) for stage 3 injuries. Community-onset AKI modified associations between ileostomy formation and new-onset CKD (P = 0.002). Odds of new-onset CKD were increased in the ileostomy group relative to the reference group for patients both with (aOR = 4.99; 95% CI = 3.42-7.28) and without (aOR = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.85-2.23) previous community-onset AKI episodes. In analyses comparing patients that underwent ileostomy formation and subsequent reversal within 1 year to the reference group without ileostomy, the relationship with new-onset CKD was attenuated for patients both with (aOR = 2.49; 95% CI = 1.50-4.12) and without (aOR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.67-1.40) previous community-onset AKI episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Ileostomy formation is strongly associated with subsequent kidney disease. Vigilance for this complication and new strategies for prevention and treatment are necessary.

Diverting ileostomy itself may not increase the rate of postoperative readmission related to dehydration after low anterior resection

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the risk of readmission in the first year after low anterior resection (LAR) for patients with rectal cancer and to identify the contributing factors for readmission related to dehydration specifically.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of 570 patients who underwent LAR for rectal cancer at National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea. A diverting loop ileostomy was performed in 357 (62.6%) of these patients. Readmission was defined as an unplanned visit to the emergency room or admission to the ward. The reasons for readmission were reviewed and compared between the ileostomy (n = 357) and no-ileostomy (n = 213) groups. The risk factors for readmission and readmission due to dehydration were analyzed using multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

Dehydration was the most common cause of readmission in both groups (ileostomy group, 6.7%, and no-ileostomy group, 4.7%, P = 0.323). On multivariable analysis, risk factors for readmission were an estimated intraoperative blood loss of ≥400 mL (odds ratio [OR], 1.757; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.058-2.918; P = 0.029), and postoperative chemotherapy (OR, 2.914; 95% CI, 1.824-4.653; P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, postoperative chemotherapy, and not a diverting loop ileostomy, was an independent risk factor for dehydration-related readmission (OR, 5.102; 95% CI, 1.772-14.688; P = 0.003).

Conclusion

The most common cause of readmission after LAR for rectal cancer was dehydration, as reported previously. Postoperative chemotherapy, not the creation of a diverting ileostomy, was identified as the risk factor associated with readmission related to dehydration.

Readmission after rectal resection in the ERAS-era: is a loop ileostomy the Achilles heel?

BACKGROUND

Rectal resection surgery is often followed by a loop ileostomy creation. Despite improvements in surgical technique and development of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, the readmission-rate after rectal resection is still estimated to be around 30%. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for readmission after rectal resection surgery. This study also investigated whether elderly patients (≥ 65 years old) dispose of a distinct patient profile and associated risk factors for readmission.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from patients who consecutively underwent rectal resection for cancer within an ERAS protocol between 2011 and 2016. The primary study endpoint was 90-day readmission. Patients with and without readmission within 90 days were compared. Additional subgroup analysis was performed in patients ≥ 65 years old.

RESULTS

A total of 344 patients were included, and 25% (n = 85) were readmitted. Main reasons for readmission were acute renal insufficiency (24%), small bowel obstruction (20%), anastomotic leakage (15%) and high output stoma (11%). In multivariate logistic regression, elevated initial creatinine level (cut-off values: 0.67-1.17 mg/dl) (OR 1.95, p = 0.041) and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR 2.63, p = 0.031) were significantly associated with readmission. For ileostomy related problems, elevated initial creatinine level (OR 2.76, p = 0.021) was identified to be significant.

CONCLUSION

Recovery after rectal resection within an ERAS protocol is hampered by the presence of a loop ileostomy. ERAS protocols should include stoma education and high output stoma prevention.

Risk factors for readmission with dehydration after ileostomy formation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Ileostomy formation is a commonly performed procedure with substantial associated morbidity. Patients with an ileostomy experience high rates of unplanned hospital readmission with dehydration, and such events have a long-term health and economic impact. Reports of the significant risk factors associated with these readmissions have been inconsistent. This study aimed to identify the significant risk factors for readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted using the Medline, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL databases. All original research articles reporting risk factors for readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation in adults were included. The primary outcome was the pooled risk ratio of clinically relevant variables potentially associated with dehydration-related readmission following ileostomy formation. The secondary outcome was the incidence of dehydration-related readmission.

RESULTS

Ten studies (27 089 patients) were included. The incidences of 30- and 60-day readmission with dehydration were 5.0% (range 2.1%-13.2%) and 10.3% (range 7.3%-14.1%), respectively. Eight variables were found to be significantly associated with dehydration-related readmission: age ≥65 years, body mass index ≥30 kg/m² , diabetes mellitus, hypertension, renal comorbidity, regular diuretic use, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis procedure and length of stay after index admission. A preoperative diagnosis of colorectal cancer was less likely to result in readmission with dehydration.

CONCLUSION

Readmission with dehydration following ileostomy formation is a significant issue with several risk factors. Awareness of these risk factors will help inform the design of future studies addressing risk prediction, allow risk stratification of ileostomates and aid in the development of personalized prevention strategies.

Risk Factors for Readmission after Ileostomy Creation: an NSQIP Database Study

BACKGROUND

Ileostomy creation is associated with excess readmissions following colorectal surgery. This study identifies risk factors for readmission in patients undergoing ileostomy creation and identifies areas of clinical intervention to reduce readmission.

METHODS

We used the NSQIP dataset including colectomy specific data to include 39,380 patients who underwent ileostomy creation between 2012 and 2017. We conducted univariate and multivariable analysis to identify predictors of surgery-related 30-day readmissions. Our multivariate model included surgery type (total abdominal colectomy, partial colectomy, enterectomy, or pelvic dissection), gender, age, race, ethnicity, preoperative renal failure, dialysis, transfusion, ascites, ventilator dependence, diabetes, ASA class, functional status, emergency case, SSI, wound disruption, postoperative renal insufficiency, postoperative sepsis, discharge destination, and wound class.

RESULTS

A total of 5718 (14.52%) patients were readmitted within 30 days. After multivariate analysis, factors associated with readmission were gender, age, Hispanic ethnicity, dialysis, transfusion, ventilator dependence, diabetes, emergency case, SSI, postoperative renal insufficiency, postoperative sepsis, and discharge to a skilled facility. Patients who had enterectomy and partial colectomies were less likely to be readmitted than patients who had a pelvic procedure. Patients with postoperative renal insufficiency or renal failure were much more likely to be readmitted.

CONCLUSION

Factors associated with readmission included the type of procedure and postoperative complications such as SSI, sepsis, and renal failure. Efforts to reduce readmission should focus on patients undergoing concomitant pelvic procedures as well as avoidance and management of common complications in this group of patients.

Early Versus Late Preventive Ileostomy Closure Following Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Most preventive ileostomy following colorectal surgery requires a closure procedure. The intervals between primary surgery and ileostomy closure remain controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare early versus late closure of preventive ileostomy following colorectal surgery.

DATA SOURCE

A systematic literature search was performed in conference papers, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Clinicaltrials.gov database.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials published through October 2019 comparing early versus late closure of ileostomy following colorectal surgery were selected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Morbidity, leak of the primary anastomosis, reoperation, surgical site infection, small-bowel obstruction/postoperative ileus, total operative time, and postoperative length of hospital stay were measured. Results were synthesized using meta-analysis and were rated as firm or weak evidence by trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 6 randomized controlled trials were included. Firm evidence from trial sequential analysis demonstrated that the early closure of ileostomy after colorectal surgery reduced the incidence of small-bowel obstruction/postoperative ileus and required less total operative time, but increased the incidence of surgical site infection, compared with late closure of ileostomy; postoperative length of hospital stay tended to be longer with early versus late closure of ileostomy. Weak evidence showed that there was no difference between early and late closure in morbidity, reoperation, or leak of the primary anastomosis.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by some evidence rated as weak from trial sequential analysis, combined analysis of small-bowel obstruction and postoperative ileus, and exclusion of the influence of chemo- or radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients, early closure of ileostomy after colorectal surgery can be considered, with a lower incidence of postoperative small-bowel obstruction/postoperative ileus and less total operative time, but a relatively high surgical site infection rate. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020160989.

Comparison of Urban-Rural Readmission Rates After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Findings From a Privately Insured Population

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the 30-day readmission rate of a privately insured population diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) who had primary tumor resection in rural and urban communities.

METHODS

Claims data of people aged <65 with a diagnosis of CRC between 2012 and 2016 and enrolled in a private health plan administered by BlueCross BlueShield of Nebraska were analyzed. Readmission was defined as the number of discharged patients who were readmitted within 30 days, divided by all discharged patients. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the factors associated with readmission.

RESULTS

The urban population had a higher readmission rate (11%) than the rural population (8%). Although the adjusted odds ratio showed that there is no difference in readmission between rural and urban residents, patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) of >1 were more likely than those without CCI to be readmitted (OR 3.59, 1.41-9.11). Patients with open vs. laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.80, 1.39-5.63) and those with an obstructed or perforated colon vs. none (OR 7.17, 3.75-13.72) were more likely to be readmitted.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission after CRC surgery occurs frequently. Interventions that target the identified risk factors should reduce readmission rates in this privately insured population.

Protocol-Based Intravenous Fluid Hydration for Newly Created Ileostomies Decreases Readmissions Secondary to Dehydration

BACKGROUND

Newly created ileostomies often result in patient readmission due to dehydration secondary to high ostomy output. Implementation of a mandatory home intravenous hydration protocol can avoid this. We aim to evaluate the impact of mandatory home intravenous hydration for patients with newly created ileostomies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients at a single, tertiary care center who underwent ileostomy creation during a period of sporadic home intravenous hydration (February 2011-December 2013) and mandatory protocol hydration (March 2016-December 2018) were reviewed for incidence of dehydration, readmissions, and emergency department visits.

RESULTS

241 patients were evaluated. 119 were in the "sporadic" group and 122 were in the "protocol" group. Operative approach differed among both groups, with hydration protocol patients undergoing 15% less open procedures and 4.9% more hand-assisted laparoscopic procedures (P = .0017). Prior to protocol implementation, 23.5% of patients were sent home with intravenous hydration. Length of hospital stay after index ileostomy creation was shorter for "protocol" patients by 3.3 days (P < .0001). 15.1% of "sporadic" patients experienced dehydration as compared to 7.4% of "protocol" patients (P = .0283). Following protocol implementation, the number of patients readmitted due to dehydration increased from 13 to 14 (P = .01).

DISCUSSION

Standardized, mandatory at-home intravenous hydration following ileostomy creation leads to a significant reduction in postoperative incidence of dehydration and dehydration-associated readmissions. This protocol should be followed for all patients with newly created ileostomies, so long as adequate home health nursing support and active surveillance are available.

Hospital Variation in Readmissions and Visits to the Emergency Department Following Ileostomy Surgery

BACKGROUND

Ileostomy surgery is associated with a high readmission rate, and care pathways to prevent readmissions have been proposed. However, the extent to which readmission rates have improved is unknown. This study examined rates of readmission and emergency department visits ("return to hospital," or RTH) across hospitals in Michigan.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing colorectal surgery with ileostomy formation from July 2012 to August 2017 in twenty Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) hospitals. Primary outcome was RTH within 30 days of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for RTH. RTH rates over time were calculated, and hospitals' risk-adjusted rates were estimated using a multivariable model. Hospitals were divided into quartiles by risk-adjusted RTH rates, and RTH rates were compared between quartiles.

RESULTS

Of 982 patients, 28.5% experienced RTH. Rates of RTH did not decrease over time. Adjusted hospital RTH rates ranged from 9.4 to 43.3%. The risk-adjusted rate in the best-performing hospital quartile was 17.5% vs. 37.3% in the worst-performing quartile (p < 0.001). Hospitals that were outliers for ileostomy RTH were not outliers for colorectal resection RTH in general.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of RTH following ileostomy surgery are high and vary between hospitals. This suggests inconsistent or ineffective use of pathways to prevent these events and potential for improvement. There is clear opportunity to standardize care to prevent RTH after ileostomy surgery.

The Relationship Between High-Output Stomas, Postoperative Ileus, and Readmission After Rectal Cancer Surgery With Diverting Ileostomy

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between high-output stomas (HOSs), postoperative ileus (POI), and readmission after rectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy.

Methods

We included 302 patients with rectal cancer who underwent restorative resection with diverting ileostomy between January 2011 and December 2015. HOSs were defined as stomas with ≥ 2,000 mL/day output. We analyzed predictive factors for readmission of these patients.

Results

Forty-eight patients (15.9%) had HOSs during the hospital stay, and 41 patients (13.6%) experienced POI. HOSs were strongly associated with POI (45.8% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001). The all-cause readmission rate was 16.9%, with 19 (6.3%) and 20 (6.6%) experiencing ileus and acute kidney injury, respectively. HOSs (27.1% vs. 15.0%, P = 0.040) and POI (34.1% vs. 14.2%, P = 0.002) were associated with all-cause readmission, and POI was associated with readmission with ileus (17.1% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.007). POI was an independent risk factor for all-cause readmission (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.640; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.162 to 6.001; P = 0.020) and readmission with ileus (adjusted OR = 3.869; 95% CI 1.387 to 10.792; P = 0.010).

Conclusion

POI was associated with readmission, particularly for subsequent ileus, in patients with diverting ileostomy. We should make efforts to reduce POI, such as strong control of HOSs, to prevent readmission.

Re-admissions after ileostomy formation: a retrospective analysis from a New Zealand tertiary centre

BACKGROUND

Ileostomy formation is a commonly performed procedure in colorectal surgery. The morbidity associated with ileostomies is substantial, particularly for unplanned hospital re-admissions and re-admissions with dehydration. Studies of post-ileostomy re-admissions from an Australasian institution are currently lacking. This retrospective study aimed to quantify the 60-day re-admission rate after ileostomy formation in a New Zealand tertiary centre and to determine the predictive factors.

METHODS

The surgical database of Auckland City Hospital was searched for all patients aged ≥18 years with a new ileostomy formed between first January 2015 and first January 2019. Patient electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain data regarding the primary outcome of re-admissions within 60 days of discharge, as well as patient and operative variables. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of all-cause re-admissions and re-admissions with dehydration.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients with 266 ileostomy formations were included. The 60-day re-admission rate was 29.3%, with dehydration present in 27.0% of these re-admissions. Renal impairment at discharge (odds ratio 2.819, 95% confidence interval 1.087-7.310) and the presence of at least one Clavien-Dindo 1 complication (odds ratio 2.268, 95% confidence interval 1.301-3.954) were independently associated with all-cause re-admission. The independent predictors of re-admission with dehydration were renal impairment at discharge, codeine prescribed on discharge, Charlson Comorbidity Index and body mass index.

CONCLUSION

Unplanned hospital re-admission following ileostomy formation is a significant issue in the New Zealand patient population. Some patient groups are at particularly high risk, such as those with renal impairment at discharge.

Is Lanreotide Really Useful in High Output Stoma? Comparison between Lanreotide to Conventional Antidiarrheal Treatment Alone

BACKGROUND

The incidence of high-output stoma (HOS) was reported to be approximately 3 to 16% in the literature, and HOS can cause dehydration. This complication is often severe enough to warrant hospital readmission and may result in renal failure. The aim of this study was to show a decrease of 50% in ileostomy output in the experimental arm using lanreotide treatment.

METHODS

Patients with an ileostomy output ≥ 1.5 l/24 hours were included in this prospective, open, multicentre randomized trial. Patients were randomly allocated between treatment arms with either lanreotide (LAN) and antidiarrhoeal treatments (TAD) (LAN-TAD group) or antidiarrhoeal treatments only (TADS group). The primary outcome was ileostomy output after 72 days. The secondary endpoints were ileostomy output during the first 6 days, blood urea and creatinine values, hospital length of stay and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

In the per-protocol analysis, there were nine patients in the control group (TADS) and six patients in the experimental group (TAD-LAN group). The stoma outputs at Day 3 (D3) in the experimental and control groups were 1,900 ± 855.7 mL and 1,728.6 ± 845.5 mL, respectively (p = 0.2). No differences were found concerning stoma output at D6, renal function, or hospital length of stay between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The trial was prematurely stopped due to the low number of patients included. The question of the usefulness of somatostatin analogues in HOS persists, especially as the cost of this treatment is high, and there is a lack of evidence of its effectiveness.

Effectiveness of the Ileostomy Pathway in Reducing Readmissions for Dehydration: Does It Stand the Test of Time?

BACKGROUND

The ileostomy pathway, introduced in 2011, has proved to be successful in eliminating hospital readmissions for high-output ileostomy or dehydration in the following period of 7 months in a single institution. However, it is unclear whether this short-term success, immediately after the initiation of the program, can be sustainable in the long term.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and the durability of the ileostomy pathway in reducing readmissions for dehydration over a longer period of time.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of the patients who entered into the ileostomy pathway, since its introduction on March 1, 2011, until January 31, 2015.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing colorectal surgery with the creation of a new end or loop ileostomy were included.

INTERVENTION

The long-term sustainability of the ileostomy pathway was assessed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was readmission within 30 days after discharge for a high-output ileostomy or dehydration.

RESULTS

A total of 393 patients (male n = 195, female n = 198, median age 52 (18-87) years) were included: 161 prepathway and 232 on-pathway. Overall 30-day postdischarge readmission rates decreased from 35.4% to 25.9% (p = 0.04). Readmissions due to high output and/or dehydration dropped from 15.5% to 3.9% (p < 0.001). Readmissions due to small-bowel obstructions dropped from 9.9% to 4.3%, (p = 0.03).

LIMITATIONS

The possible limitations of the study included a nonrandomized comparison of the patient groups and those patients who were possibly admitted to different institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

The present ileostomy pathway decreases readmissions for high-output ileostomy and dehydration in patients with new ileostomies and is durable in the long term. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B233. EFICACIA DE VÍA DE ILEOSTOMÍA PARA REDUCIR LOS REINGRESOS POR DESHIDRATACIÓN: ¿RESISTE LA PRUEBA DEL TIEMPO?: La vía de ileostomía, introducida en 2011, ha demostrado ser exitosa en la eliminación de reingresos hospitalarios por ileostomía de alto rendimiento o deshidratación, por un período de 7 meses, en una sola institución. Sin embargo, no se ha aclarado si el éxito es a corto plazo, inmediatamente después del inicio del programa, y de que pueda ser sostenible a largo plazo.El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la eficacia y la durabilidad de la vía de ileostomía, para disminuir los reingresos por deshidratación, durante un período de tiempo más largo.Esta fue una revisión retrospectiva de pacientes que ingresaron a la vía de ileostomía, desde su introducción el 1 de marzo de 2011 hasta el 31 de enero de 2015.Este estudio se realizó en un centro académico terciario.Se incluyeron pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal con la creación de una nueva ileostomía de extremo o asa.Evaluar la sostenibilidad de la vía de ileostomía a largo plazo.El punto final primario fue el reingreso dentro de los 30 días posteriores al alta, por una ileostomía de alto gasto o deshidratación.Se incluyeron un total de 393 pacientes (hombres n = 195, mujeres n = 198, edad media 52 [18-87] años), 161 antes de la vía y 232 en la vía. En general, las tasas de reingreso después del alta a 30 días, disminuyeron de 35.4% a 25.9% (p = 0.04). Los reingresos por alto rendimiento y / o deshidratación, disminuyeron del 15.5% al 3.9% (p < 0.001). Los reingresos debidos a obstrucciones del intestino delgado, disminuyeron del 9.9% al 4.3% (p = 0.03).Las posibles limitaciones del estudio incluyeron una comparación no aleatoria de los grupos de pacientes, y de aquellos pacientes que posiblemente fueron admitidos en diferentes instituciones.La vía de ileostomía disminuye los reingresos por ileostomía de alto gasto y deshidratación, en nuevos pacientes con ileostomía, y es duradera a largo plazo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B233.