Incidence of venous thromboembolism among postmenopausal women prescribed ospemifene, selective estrogen receptor modulators for noncancer indications, or untreated vulvar and vaginal atrophy

Review of current and emerging estrogen receptor agonists for vaginal atrophy

INTRODUCTION

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) predominantly affects postmenopausal women due to hormonal decline but can also occur in premenopausal women with conditions such as primary ovarian insufficiency or exposure to anti-estrogen medications. Contributing factors include smoking and certain medical treatments. Symptoms like dyspareunia and loss of sexual function affect many women but are underreported due to stigma and lack of awareness. Current treatments range from over-the-counter lubricants to hormonal therapies like estrogen receptor agonists, which improve vaginal elasticity and moisture with minimal systemic absorption.

AREAS COVERED

This review evaluates current and emerging estrogen receptor agonists for VVA treatment. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed between August and September 2024, supplemented by snowball sampling from key references.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite its prevalence, VVA remains underdiagnosed, with increasing recognition due to longer lifespans and focus on quality of life. Diagnosis involves comprehensive symptom assessment, including sexual history, urinary tract infection frequency, and clinical exams, with vaginal pH measurements and smear microscopy to determine the condition's severity. Treatment usually involves estrogen, but not all women can safely use it, and preferences toward estrogen must be respected. Alternatives like selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as prasterone and ospemifene show promise but need more long-term safety data. Emerging options like E3 and E4 demonstrate efficacy and safety in low doses. Future treatments will emphasize convenience and adherence, making timely diagnosis and management of VVA routine in women's health care.

The Role of Sympathetic Nerves in Osteoporosis: A Narrative Review

Osteoporosis, a systemic bone disease, is characterized by decreased bone density due to various reasons, destructed bone microstructure, and increased bone fragility. The incidence of osteoporosis is very high among the elderly, and patients with osteoporosis are prone to suffer from spine fractures and hip fractures, which cause great harm to patients. Meanwhile, osteoporosis is mainly treated with anti-osteoporosis drugs that have side effects. Therefore, the development of new treatment modalities has a significant clinical impact. Sympathetic nerves play an important role in various physiological activities and the regulation of osteoporosis as well. Therefore, the role of sympathetic nerves in osteoporosis was reviewed, aiming to provide information for future targeting of sympathetic nerves in osteoporosis.

Risk of venous thromboembolism among women receiving ospemifene: a comparative observational study

Introduction:

The primary aim of this study was to compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among women initiating ospemifene vs other selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) therapies for estrogen-deficiency conditions or breast cancer prevention, and vs women with untreated vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). The secondary objective examined numerous additional safety outcomes.

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study using the IBM Watson MarketScan claims database. Women receiving ospemifene, another SERM, or with a new diagnosis of VVA with no treatment from 1 May 2013 to 2 October 2018 were followed through the claims for incident adverse outcomes. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of VTE following cohort entry; secondary outcomes included cerebrovascular events and other adverse events potentially associated with SERM use. Cox models compared the risk of VTE between ospemifene and comparators, using a variety of approaches to control for confounding.

Results:

The incidence of VTE during the first continuous treatment episode was 3.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55–6.43) events per 1,000 person-years (PY) for ospemifene ( N = 8977), 11.30 (95% CI: 8.81–14.28) events per 1,000 PY for comparator SERM ( N = 12,621), and 10.92 (95% CI: 10.49–11.37) events per 1,000 PY for untreated VVA ( N = 242,488). Cox models indicated no increase in risk of VTE for ospemifene vs other SERMs (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.19–0.82), and vs untreated VVA (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24–0.91).

Conclusion:

This real-world safety analysis found no increase in risk of VTE or other adverse events with use of ospemifene in postmenopausal women.

Plain Language Summary

Introduction: This study assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among women treated with ospemifene or another selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) therapy and women with untreated vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). Numerous additional safety outcomes were examined. Methods: This study was conducted in the IBM Watson MarketScan claims database. Women receiving ospemifene, another SERM, or with a new diagnosis of VVA with no treatment from 1 May 2013 to 2 October 2018 were followed through the claims for adverse outcomes, including VTE, cerebrovascular events (such as stroke), and other outcomes that might occur with use of a SERM. The analyses compared the risk of VTE between ospemifene and the other two groups, using methods that accounted for differences in patient characteristics between the groups. Because few women over 72 years old used ospemifene, the main analyses examined women aged 54–72 years. Results: The analyses included 8,977 ospemifene users, 12,621 other SERM users, and 242,488 women with untreated VVA. Among women aged 54–72 years, only 9 experienced a VTE during ospemifene treatment, while 55 other SERM users and 1,788 women with untreated VVA had a VTE. The analyses that accounted for differences between the groups confirmed that the risk of VTE was no higher in ospemifene users than in either comparison group. Conclusion: This real-world safety analysis found no increase in risk of VTE or other adverse events with use of ospemifene in postmenopausal women.

Vaginal health, endometrial thickness and changes in bone markers in postmenopausal women after 6 months of treatment with ospemifene in real clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To assess vaginal health, endometrial thickness, and changes in bone markers in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) treated with 60 mg/day of ospemifene under routine clinical practice.

METHODS

The AYSEX study is a Spanish observational and prospective study performed in one center in which 5 gynecologists recruited postmenopausal women with VVA in routine clinical practice treated continuously with ospemifene 60 mg/day for 12 months as an appropriate therapeutic option. This article refers to the 3- and 6-months analysis. Vaginal health was assessed by pH and using Vaginal Health Index (VHI) at baseline and 3 months later. Endometrial thickness, measured by vaginal ultrasonography, and bone resorption marker (CTx) were assessed at baseline and 6 months later.

RESULTS

A total of 100 postmenopausal women cytologically and clinically diagnosed with VVA were included in the study. After 3 months of treatment with ospemifene, pH improved from 6.1 to 4.5 (p < .0001), and VHI improved from 10 to 19 points (p < .0001). The percentage of patients with VVA according to VHI decreased from 100% to 5.2% (p < .0001). After 6 months, mean CTx levels decreased from 0.42 pg/ml at baseline to 0.37 pg/ml 6 months later (p = .0018), and mean endometrial thickness changed from 2.24 to 2.15 mm (p = .6066).

CONCLUSIONS

Up to date, this is the only prospective and observational study with ospemifene in routine clinical practice conditions and confirms the results previously reported from randomized controlled clinical trials, improving VVA, not increasing endometrial thickness, and decreasing CTx levels by exerting an anti-resorptive function.

The role of hormone therapy in urogenital health after menopause

Menopause represents an endocrine challenge to urogenital health, as oestrogens deprivation and androgens decline significantly contributes to age-related involution of vulvovaginal tissues and lower urinary tract. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a clinical entity including the chronic and progressive condition of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) and encompassing both anatomical and functional consequences of menopause. The term GSM describes genital, sexual and urinary symptoms with a detrimental impact on quality of life (QOL). Several treatment options are available, but many barriers are still present to adequately diagnose and treat GSM. This review aims to present current evidences about epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of GSM, with a focus on prescription medications [low-dose local oestrogen therapy (LET), prasterone (DHEA) and the SERM ospemifene] for urogenital symptoms in healthy postmenopausal women and in special populations, including women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and breast cancer survivors (BCS).

Risks vs. benefits of switching therapy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Introduction: Osteoporosis is characterized by the fragility of bones, leading to fractures and, consequently, the deterioration of functional capacity and quality of life. Postmenopausal women, in particular, are prone to osteoporosis and often require anti-osteoporosis treatment. In the last few decades, various anti-osteoporosis drugs have been approved for clinical use. In an aging society, osteoporosis cannot be treated using a single agent; therefore, switching therapy is an important treatment strategy.Areas covered: This review covers switching therapy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. It's extremely important to understand the characteristics of each drug including; limitations on the duration of use, side effects due to long-term use (such as atypical femur fracture and osteonecrosis of the jaw) or discontinuation (such as rebound phenomenon), compliance, and ability to prevent fractures. We review and summarize the risks and benefits of switching therapy.Expert opinion: When switching therapy, the order of drug administration is important. Routine monitoring should be continued after switching treatments. We recommend first using osteoanabolic agents in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis. In addition, identifying predictors of the efficacy and side effects of treatment may help prevent the inappropriate use of drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of menopausal symptoms

Introduction: Menopausal symptoms can be very overwhelming for women. Over the years, many pharmacotherapeutic options have been tested, and others are still being developed. Hormone therapy (HT) is the most efficient therapy for managing vasomotor symptoms and related disturbances. The term HT comprises estrogens and progestogens, androgens, tibolone, the tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC), a combination of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens, and the selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as ospemifene. Estrogens and progestogens and androgens may differ significantly for chemical structure and can be delivered through different routes, thereby displaying various pharmacological and clinical properties. Tibolone, TSEC and SERM also exhibit unique pharmacodynamics that can be exploited to obtain distinctive therapeutic effects. Non-hormonal options fall mainly into the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and selective noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), GABA-analogue drug classes.Areas covered: Herein, the authors describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of hormonal (androgens, estrogens, progestogens, tibolone, TSEC, SERMs) and non-hormonal (SSRIs, SNRIs, Gabapentin, Pregabalin, Oxybutynin, Neurokinin antagonists) treatments for menopausal symptoms and report essential clinical trial data in humans.Expert opinion: Patient tailoring of treatment is key to managing symptoms of menopause. Physicians must have in-depth knowledge of the pharmacology of compounds to tailor therapy to the individual patient's characteristics and needs.

Experience with ospemifene in patients with vulvar and vaginal atrophy and associated sexual dysfunction: case studies

The pathophysiological changes associated with hypoestrogenism of menopause, a condition known as genitourinary syndrome of menopause, are responsible for the hallmark symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), namely dyspareunia secondary to vaginal dryness. Many postmenopausal women with VVA find sexual relations to be challenging or impossible. Ospemifene has estrogen-like effects on the vaginal epithelium, and is indicated to treat moderate-to-severe symptomatic VVA (Europe) or moderate-to-severe symptomatic dyspareunia and vaginal dryness (United States) in postmenopausal women. The case studies presented in this article follow the progress of two women who began treatment with ospemifene for the main presenting symptom of dyspareunia. Both women had concerns about the impact of their symptomatology on new relationships. The patient in case 1 experienced relevant improvement within 3 months of treatment start and, by 1 year, dyspareunia was absent. Vaginal lubricants were no longer required. The patient in case 2 experienced relevant improvement within 4 weeks of starting ospemifene. At 15 months, with the use of a lubricant for vaginal penetration, she could enjoy sexual intercourse without pain. At the time of writing, she had been receiving ospemifene continuously for more than 2 years with effective symptom relief and good tolerability.

Ospemifene for vulvar and vaginal atrophy: an overview

The menopause-related decline in estrogen levels leads to an array of genital, sexual, and urinary symptoms collectively known as genitourinary syndrome of menopause. The constellation of symptoms associated with vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) can have a profoundly detrimental effect on a woman's sexual function, relationships, and quality of life. Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator indicated for treatment of moderate-to-severe symptomatic VVA in postmenopausal women who are not candidates for local vaginal estrogen therapy or have contraindications for estrogen products. Ospemifene is administered orally, thus avoiding the inconveniences of local therapy, and can be used in women with VVA and a history of breast cancer after completing all (including adjuvant) breast cancer treatment. As well as restoring vaginal health in symptomatic VVA, ospemifene may have collateral benefits of importance to postmenopausal women. In this Special Issue entitled "Treatment of Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy: Clinical Experience with Ospemifene," illustrative case studies examine the experiences of women with VVA during treatment with ospemifene. Specific topics include the effects of ospemifene on bone markers; its use in breast cancer survivors and in women with dyslipidemia, urinary incontinence, or VVA-related sexual dysfunction; and its concomitant use with laser therapy.