Early Cleft Lip Repair Revisited: A Safe and Effective Approach Utilizing a Multidisciplinary Protocol

Don't Delay: Sociodemographic Factors Impacting Timing of Cleft Lip Repair

Optimal treatment of cleft lip (CL) with or without cleft palate requires early evaluation, surgical planning, and timely repair. Sociodemographic barriers may cause delays in the treatment of patients with CL. This study aims to identify the sociodemographic and clinical factors that may delay CL repair. This IRB-approved retrospective analyzed patients treated for CL at a tertiary academic center (2015-2023). The primary outcome was age at CL surgery, with >6 months considered delayed. Surgical timing was compared across sociodemographic factors. A total of 241 patients (88 White, 72 Hispanic, 21 Black, and 60 other) were included. Of these, 84 had isolated CL and 157 had cleft lip and palate. The median repair age was 4.5 months (IQR: 3.8-5.7), with 79.3% undergoing surgery by 6 months. Delays in CL repair were more common in families with <$75,000 income (25.0% versus 14.0%; P=0.04), Medicaid insurance versus private (25.4% versus 9.7%; P<0.01), Black (18.2%) or Hispanic (27.8%) versus White patients (11.7%; P=0.049), and those with medical comorbidities (54.0% versus 15.3%, P<0.001). Nasoalveolar molding (NAM) reduced delay, whereas cleft lip adhesion (CLA) surgery increased it (10.1%, 82.4%, and 18.7% for NAM, CLA, no infant orthopedic, respectively; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified medical comorbidities (OR: 8.21; P<0.001) and CLA (OR 46.4, P<0.001) as strong predictors of delay, whereas NAM use predicted timely repair (OR: 0.19, P<0.01). Sociodemographic factors were not independent predictors. Institutional and state-level programs targeting these factors may help decrease the barriers to CL care.

A Summary of the Existing Data on Cleft Surgical Outcomes: What Do We Not Know?

Globally, cleft surgical protocols have nuanced differences between centers, yet the goals of cleft lip and palate (CLP) repair are similar. These protocols all aim to achieve optimal aesthetic appearance and speech outcomes while limiting significant complications such as velopharyngeal insufficiency and midface hypoplasia. Variability in complication rates following primary CLP repair has been well documented within the literature. A series of systematic reviews investigate the impact of factors on surgical outcomes, all demonstrating an inability to comment on the ideal technique and timing to optimize outcomes. This article presents a summary of the current state of the literature on surgical outcomes following CLP repair. Studies were limited by small samples sizes; standardized measurement tools; study design; and lack of diversity in cleft phenotype, severity, and patient population. These limitations highlight the need for further research with more representative populations globally, standardized measurement tools, and a global consortium of cleft surgeons to make recommendations based on improved data. As the need for training in cleft surgery expands across the globe, evidence-based algorithms are essential to optimize outcomes and limit costly complications.

Evolution of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery and the Pursuit for Consensus on Standardized Algorithms of Care

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) surgery has evolved over centuries in an attempt to achieve anatomical closure while optimizing speech and limiting fistulas and midface hypoplasia. Masters of cleft surgery and early pioneers inspired generations of surgical innovators to refine techniques and timing to improve surgical outcomes. Constant modification has resulted in significant diversity of cleft surgical protocols across institutions. Unlike many other surgical conditions, there is no gold-standard algorithm of care for CLP. Several international consortiums, including Eurocleft, Americleft, and Scandcleft, aimed to investigate the ideal cleft care protocol. Despite the inclusion of multiple institutions and attempts at long-term follow-up, these studies were limited by small sample sizes, lack of diversity in patient population, poor long-term follow-up, lack of standardized measurement tools, and inability to control for confounders such as severity. This article aimed to present the findings of these early pioneer consortiums in their pursuit for the optimal CLP surgical protocol and recommend a direction for future research with a global consortium of experts in cleft care.

Barriers to timely primary cleft surgery in patients treated by an international cleft-focused NGO across 18 countries

INTRODUCTION

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL ± P) constitutes a significant portion of the global surgical burden. Patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face disproportionate barriers that result in delayed surgical repair, worse long-term outcomes, and increased morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify patient-reported barriers and demographic characteristics associated with delayed CL ± P surgery in LMICs where Operation Smile provides surgical care.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients treated by Operation Smile between 2021 and 2024 was conducted. Variables included patient demographics, socioeconomic information, and self-reported barriers to care. Delayed repair was defined as greater than 9 months for cleft lip and 18 months for cleft palate. Data were analyzed using chi-squared and t-tests. Significant variables then underwent uni/multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Six hundred and sixty-eight patients were included, of which 339 (50.7%) underwent lip repair and 329 (49.3%) underwent palate repair. The most common patient-reported barrier was surgical cost (n = 561 and 84.0%). On multivariate regression, increased maternal age significantly increased odds of delayed surgery (OR = 1.03[1.003, 1.07] and p = 0.04) and maternal postsecondary education decreased odds among lip repair patients (OR = 0.22[0.05, 0.77] and p = 0.03). For palate repair, maternal age (OR = 1.05[1.01, 1.09] and p = 0.02) and surgical cost (OR = 2.85[1.42, 5.71] and p = 0.003) increased odds of delay, whereas paternal university-level education decreased odds (OR = 0.15[0.02, 0.81] and p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Surgical cost is a primary barrier to timely CL ± P repair among patients in LMICs. Higher education among parents is associated with lower odds of delay. These barriers can inform global surgical organization strategies to improve access for patients at risk of delay.

Comparison of Lip Revision Rates in Traditional Versus Early Cleft Lip Repair: An Institutional Review

BACKGROUND

Traditional cleft lip repair (TLR) is performed between 3 and 6 months of age. For over 10 years, our institution has transitioned from offering presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) before cleft lip repair to performing early cleft lip repair (ECLR) within 2 to 5 weeks of life, circumventing the use of NAM.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to estimate and compare the lip revision rates between patients who underwent ECLR versus TLR ± NAM.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip who underwent primary repair between 2004 and 2021 at Children's Hospital Los Angeles were included. Exclusion criteria were as follows: American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III or higher, syndromic or bilateral cases, gestational-corrected age of more than 6 months at lip repair, and less than 2 years of follow-up.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The predictor variable was the timing of primary cleft lip repair. Subjects were allocated to 1 of 2 treatment cohorts: ECLR (<3 months) and TLR ± NAM (3 to 6 months).

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE

The primary outcome was lip revision surgery at any time during the patient's cleft care. Secondary outcomes included the extent and timing of the revision surgeries.

COVARIATES

Data collection included presurgical NAM use, surgeon, cleft phenotype, and cleft width ratio.

ANALYSES

A 2-phased coarsened exact matching process was performed to match cohorts based on surgeon, cleft phenotype, and cleft width ratio at a 1:1 ratio. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate and compare the revision rates.

RESULTS

A total of 1,101 patients underwent primary repair during the study period. After applying the exclusion criteria, 362 patients remained before matching. Among these, 154 patients (77 ECLR, 77 TLR ± NAM) were included after matching. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated a lower 5-year revision rate for the ECLR cohort compared to the TLR ± NAM cohort (17.3 vs 32.6%, log-rank P < .05). Median follow-up time was 6.6 years [interquartile range 4.4 to 9.2].

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

ECLR resulted in approximately a 2-fold reduction in lip revision rates compared with TLR ± NAM. These findings suggest that cleft lip repair at approximately 1 month of age may decrease the burden of secondary procedures later in life.

Impact of early cleft lip and palate surgery on maxillary growth in 5- and 10-Year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated maxillary growth and dental arch relationships at 5 and 10 years of age in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) who underwent early cleft lip and palate surgery.

METHODS

28 patients with UCLP who underwent cleft lip surgery in neonatal age and cleft palate surgery at average age of 7 months without orthodontic treatment (intervention group) were measured for intercanine and intermolar distances and for dental arch length. These measurements were compared with those of 30 healthy participants in a control group. Dental arch relationships in the intervention group were evaluated by 5-YO index at 5 years and the GOSLON Yardstick score at 10 years of patients' age.

RESULTS

Patients in the intervention group had significantly shorter mean intercanine distance and arch length than control patients at both 5 and 10 years of age (p<.001 for all). There were no significant differences in intermolar distance at both 5 (p = .945) and 10 years (p = .105) of patients' age. The average 5YO index increased from 2.46 to an average GOSLON 10-year score of 2.89 in intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Intercanine distance and dental arch length of patients with UCLP are significantly reduced at 5 and 10 years after early cleft lip and palate surgeries compared to the healthy population. Dental arch relationships at 5 and 10 years of patients with UCLP show comparable outcomes to those reported by other cleft centers.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study evaluates maxillary growth in UCLP patients 5 and 10 years of age who underwent early primary lip and palate surgery.

Single-Stage Posterior Vomerine Ostectomy and Primary Cheiloplasty in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip & Palate and Protuberant Premaxilla

OBJECTIVE

A protruded premaxilla has always been challenging to care for by cleft care professionals. This study aims to fortify the use of a single-stage premaxillary setback, with posterior vomerine ostectomy and primary cheiloplasty to achieve proper care for patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and protruded premaxilla.

DESIGN

Longitudinal retrospective analysis.

SETTING

Twenty-three outreach programs to four countries (Ecuador, Lebanon, Peru, and El-Salvador) between 2016-2022.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-five patients between the ages of 3 months and 6 years and 5 months, with BCLP and severely protruded premaxilla underwent premaxillary setback via posterior vomerine ostectomy and primary cheiloplasty. Patients with diagnosed syndromes and inaccessible vomer bone due to fused palates were excluded from the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Premaxillary setback with posterior vomerine ostectomy, bilateral gingivoperiosteoplasties (GPP), and primary cheiloplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 13.17 ± 14.1 months, with an average follow-up time of 26 ± 17 months. Patients underwent their procedures in Ecuador (72%), Peru (9%), Lebanon (8%) and El-Salvador (1%). The majority of patients were aged 1 year or less (66.7%) and were males (58.5%). All patients were operated on successfully and had good aesthetic outcomes. Only one patient developed partial necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with BCLP and severe premaxillary protrusion have always carried immense social, psychological, and financial burdens, especially in outreach settings. Our described single-stage technique has proven to be safe and effective with good aesthetic results. Further follow-up after primary repair should be done to document and ensure proper facial growth and normal nasolabial maturation.

Cleft Lip Surgery in Sudan: Clinical Presentations, Early Outcomes, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction: A sub-Saharan African experience

Background

Cleft lip and palate are the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies. They account for approximately 13% of all congenital anomalies.

Objectives

To study the presentation of cleft lip and the early results of surgical repair among patients who presented to our centers.

Methods

This was a hospital-based prospective cohort study of 72 patients who underwent cleft lip repair in Sudan.

Results

The commonest age group was between 10-18 months. The male-to-female ratio was 2:1, and a family history of cleft lip was found in 2.8% of patients. The cleft lip was complete in 81.9%, incomplete in 12.5%, and hybrid in 5.6% of patients. Associated cleft palate was observed in 54 patients. Associated syndromes were found in 10 patients. The surgery was carried out in most patients at 9 months or less; in 4 patients, it was more than 18 months. Achievement of reasonable lip repair was moderate (50% collectively). High achievement was observed for criteria, such as accurate union (90.3%), and sub-moderate achievement in even vermillion border and cupid's bow (44%), low nose symmetry (30.6%), and quality of scar (18.1%). Early complications were reported at the rate of 13.9%. Patient satisfaction was 59.7%; however, the professionals showed higher satisfaction levels (66.7%). The anthropometric measurements of normal infants were moderately similar to those of the infants who underwent surgery.

Conclusion

The patients with cleft lip showed early presentation, with a predominance of the male gender and left side pattern. The preliminary outcome of cleft lip repair was moderate, with variations in different criteria. Patient and professional satisfaction were above average.

Application of 3D Printing in Cleft Lip and Palate Repair

This manuscript reviews the transformative impact of 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies in the treatment and management of cleft lip and palate (CLP), highlighting its application across presurgical planning, surgical training, implantable scaffolds, and postoperative care. By integrating patient-specific data through computer-aided design and manufacturing, 3D printing offers tailored solutions that improve surgical outcomes, reduce operation times, and enhance patient care. The review synthesizes current research findings, technical advancements, and clinical applications, illustrating the potential of 3D printing to revolutionize CLP treatment. Further, it discusses the future directions of combining 3D printing with other innovative technologies like artificial intelligence, 4D printing, and in situ bioprinting for more comprehensive care strategies. This paper underscores the necessity for multidisciplinary collaboration and further research to overcome existing challenges and fully utilize the capabilities of 3D printing in CLP repair.

Single-Stage Posterior Vomerine Ostectomy, Premaxillary Setback, Bilateral Gingivoperiosteoplasties and Primary Bilateral Cheiloplasty in Patients with Protuberant Premaxilla

Various patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate present with a protruded premaxilla. Several techniques have been described for correctional repair of the projection with a plethora of unsatisfactory outcomes. This poses a challenge not only for the cleft team providing care but also for the patients and their respective families. Multiple patients suffer from residual deformities after inadequate primary repair, which increase surgical, financial, and psychological burden. Premaxillary setback with posterior vomerine ostectomy and complete bilateral cleft lip repair can promote alignment of the premaxilla with the maxillary prominences. To effectively address this challenging deformity, we describe a single-stage surgical technique that includes vomerine ostectomy posterior to the vomero-premaxillary suture, bilateral gingivoperiosteoplasties with complete bilateral cleft lip repair, and primary cleft rhinoplasty. Careful surgical planning is essential for adequate matching between the length of the protruded premaxilla and the extent of ostectomy. The described technique offers several advantages for the management of complete bilateral cleft lip with a projected premaxilla. It can be applied anywhere around the world and is most beneficial in underprivileged areas where patients suffer from restricted access to healthcare, absence of presurgical orthodontics and lack of sufficient resources.

Simulation Training Approach for Cleft Lip and Palate Repair in Low-Income Countries

BACKGROUND

During periods of civil strife, the need for trauma care and lack of sufficient cleft surgeons causes an increase in children left untreated with cleft lip and palate deformities. During the Syrian war, some cleft care was provided through visiting charities, with surgeries performed both in Syria and neighboring countries. There is a need to increase the number of adequately trained cleft surgeons available in such regions so that care can be achieved beyond mission trips.

METHODOLOGY

Cleft lip and palate repair workshops were delivered to 50 doctors in Syria. Pre-workshop, trainees received supplementary learning material. During the workshop, attendees received didactic teaching followed by 2 simulation sessions. Pre- and post-workshop, attendees completed questionnaires regarding their confidence and ability to perform cleft lip and palate repair.

RESULTS

Pre-workshop, 96% of workshop attendees had never independently performed cleft lip repair while 100% of attendees had not previously performed cleft palate repair. The mean pre-workshop confidence score was 2.452. Post-workshop, the mean confidence score was 3.503. Confidence rating scores significantly improved (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The workshop delivered in Syria, together with this cleft lip and palate simulator provides an effective training tool that may support surgical training globally, particularly those in low-income countries. Further support is needed by charity organizations to ensure the continued delivery of such training.

Comparing Outcomes of Traditional Lip Repair Versus Early Cleft Lip Repair on a National Scale

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip (CL) is one of the most common congenital anomalies and has traditionally been repaired surgically when the patient is between 3 and 6 months of age. However, recent single-institutional studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of early CL repairs (ECLRs) during the neonatal period. This study seeks to evaluate the outcomes of ECLR (repair <1 month) versus traditional lip repair (TLR) by comparing outcomes on a national scale.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Date File was used to query patients who underwent CL repairs between 2012 and 2022. The main outcome measures were anesthesia times and perioperative complications. The main predictive variable was operative group (ECLR vs TLR). Patients were considered to be in the ECLR cohort if they were younger than 30 days after birth at the time of cleft repair. Student t test and χ2 analyses were used to evaluate categorical and continuous differences, respectively. Multiple logistic regression was performed to model the association of ECLR versus TLR with death within 30 days, overall complication rates, dehiscence rates, readmission within 30 days, and reoperation rates while controlling for various covariates.

RESULTS

Multiple linear regression determined that the ECLR cohort had significantly shorter operative times when controlling for operative complications, sex, cardiac risk factors, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (coefficient = -34.4; confidence interval, -47.8 to -20.9; P < 0.001). Similarly, multiple linear regression demonstrated ECLR patients to have significantly shorter time of exposure to anesthesia (coefficient = -35.0; 95% confidence interval, -50.3 to -19.7; P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that ECLR was not significantly associated with an increased likelihood of any postoperative complication when controlling for sex, cardiac risk factors, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study provide nationwide evidence that ECLR does not lead to an increased risk of adverse outcomes or complications. In addition, ECLR patients have shorter surgeries and shorter exposure to anesthesia compared with TLR. The results provide further evidence that ECLR can be done safely where earlier intervention may result in better feeding/weight gain and subsequently improve cleft care. However, longer-term studies are warranted to further elucidate the effects of this protocol.

Sagittal Growth Restriction of the Midface Following Isolated Cleft Lip Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Midface hypoplasia (MFH) is a long-term sequela of cleft lip and palate repair, and is poorly understood. No study has examined the aggregate data on sagittal growth restriction of the midface following repair of the lip, but not palate, in these patients.

A systematic review of 3780 articles was performed. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and 11 reported cephalometric measurements amenable to meta-analysis. Patients with Veau class I-III palatal clefts were included so long as they had undergone only lip repair. Groups were compared against both noncleft and unrepaired controls.

Cephalometrics were reported for 326 patients (31.3% female). Noncleft controls had an average SNA angle of 81.25° ± 3.12°. The only patients demonstrating hypoplastic SNA angles were those with unilateral CLP with isolated lip repair (77.4° ± 4.22°). Patients with repaired CL had SNA angles similar to noncleft controls (81.4° ± 4.02°). Patients with unrepaired CLP and CL tended toward more protruding maxillae, with SNA angles of 83.3° ± 4.04° and 87.9° ± 3.11°, respectively. Notably, when comparing SNA angles between groups, patients with CLP with isolated lip repair had significantly more hypoplastic angles compared to those with repaired CL (P < .0001). Patients with CLP with isolated lip repair were also more hypoplastic than noncleft controls (P < .0001). In contrast, there was no significant difference between the SNA of patients with repaired CL and controls (P = .648).

We found that cleft lip repair only appeared to contribute to MFH in the setting of concurrent cleft palate pathology, suggesting that scarring from lip repair itself is unlikely to be the predominant driver of MFH development. However, studies generally suffered from inadequate reporting of timing, technique, follow-up time, and cleft severity.

Age at Initial Cleft Lip Repair Among Children in Al Madinah Region

BACKGROUND

 Cleft lip and palate consists of a wide spectrum of anomalies affecting the oral cavity and lips and can have enduring adverse effects on health. The age at which surgical interventions are done is crucial as it can influence the outcomes. This study aimed to determine the age at which initial cleft lip repairs were performed and the proportion of individuals who underwent additional surgeries to address post-repair complications.

METHODS

 A cross-sectional study involving 120 participants was conducted. Data was collected by distributing an online questionnaire to parents of children who had undergone initial cleft lip repair in the Al Madinah region.

RESULTS

 The study found that the average age for the initial cleft lip repair in Medina is 0.46 ± 0.27 years. Post-repair complications were observed, including hearing loss in 10.9% of children, heavy breathing issues in 32.8%, an imbalance in facial expression in 47.9%, and swallowing problems in 3.4% of children even after surgery. Approximately 40% of parents sought further procedures to mitigate complications.

CONCLUSION

 The study indicated that the first cleft lip repair in Medina typically occurs during the first year of life. However, more extensive research is needed to assess the efficacy of procedures within the city. Further studies should be conducted to provide a more comprehensive understanding of these conditions and the outcomes of their treatments.

Lessons Learned from a Single Institution's Eight Years of Experience with Early Cleft Lip Repair

Background and Objectives: The traditional approach in managing wide cleft lip deformities involves presurgical nasoalveolar molding (NAM) therapy followed by surgical cleft lip repair between three and six months of age. This institution has implemented an early cleft lip repair (ECLR) protocol where infants undergo primary cleft lip repair between two and five weeks of age without NAM. This study aims to present this institution's ECLR repair protocol over the past eight years from 188 consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral CL/P deformity. Materials and Methods: Retrospective review was conducted at Children's Hospital Los Angeles evaluating patients who underwent ECLR before three months of age and were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II from 2015-2022. Anthropometric analysis was performed, and pre- and postoperative photographs were evaluated to assess nasal and lip symmetry. Results: The average age at cleft lip repair after correcting for gestational age was 1.0 ± 0.5 months. Mean operative and anesthetic times were 120.3 ± 33.0 min and 189.4 ± 35.4, respectively. Only 2.1% (4/188) of patients had postoperative complications. Lip revision rates were 11.4% (20/175) and 15.4% (2/13) for unilateral and bilateral repairs, respectively, most of which were minor in severity (16/22, 72.7%). Postoperative anthropometric measurements demonstrated significant improvements in nasal and lip symmetry (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis demonstrates the safety and efficacy of ECLR in correcting all unilateral cleft lip and nasal deformities of patients who were ASA classes I or II. At this institution, ECLR has minimized the need for NAM, which is now reserved for patients with bilateral cleft lip, late presentation, or comorbidities that preclude them from early repair. ECLR serves as a valuable option for patients with a wide range of cleft severity while reducing the burden of care.

Prenatal Consultation Outcomes for Infants With Cleft Lip With and Without Cleft Palate

To assess the clinical impacts of prenatal consultation with a multidisciplinary cleft team on infants with cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL ± P).

Retrospective cases series.

Tertiary pediatric hospital.

Infants with CL ± P whose mothers received prenatal consultation with a pediatric otolaryngology team from June 2005 to December 2019 were identified. A random sample of infants with CL ± P without prenatal consultation from June 2005 to December 2019 was also identified.

The primary outcomes were the length of hospitalization during the first 12 weeks of life, timing of surgical repair, length of postsurgical hospitalization, and number of unplanned clinic visits and phone calls for feeding evaluation.

Time to cleft lip repair differed significantly between the 2 groups with repair performed at 13.4 (±0.9) weeks for the prenatal consultation group (n = 73) and 15.3 (±2.1) weeks for the control group (n = 80), (P < .05). If hospitalization was required for feeding difficulties during the first 12 weeks of life, length of stay was 4.9 (± 1.7) days for infants with prenatal consultation and 11.5 (± 7.2) days for control infants (P < .05). Unplanned clinic visits with a speech-language pathologist (SLP) for feeding difficulties were needed for 2.7% of prenatal consultation infants and 11.3% of control infants (P < .05).

Prenatal consultation regarding CL ± P resulted in infants with decreased duration of early hospitalizations, earlier cleft lip repair, and decreased engagement with the SLP feeding clinic for feeding difficulties when compared with infants without prenatal consultation.

Narcotic Utilization After Cleft Lip Repair: Does Local Anesthetic Choice Matter?

To analyze whether the choice of intraoperative local anesthetic for cleft lip repair is associated with the amount of perioperative narcotic utilization.

Retrospective cohort study.

Hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System.

Primary cleft lip repairs performed in the United States from 2010 to 2020.

Local anesthesia injected-treatment with lidocaine alone, bupivacaine alone, or treatment with both agents.

Perioperative narcotic administration.

During the study interval, 8954 patients underwent primary cleft lip repair. Narcotic utilization for unilateral (P < .001) and bilateral (P = .004) cleft lip repair has decreased over the last 5 years. Overall, 21.8% (n = 1950) of infants were administered perioperative narcotics for cleft lip repair, such that 14.3% (n = 1282) required narcotics on POD 0, and 7.2% (n = 647) required narcotics on POD 1.In this study, 36.5% (n = 3269) patients received lidocaine, 22.0% (n = 1966) patients received bupivacaine, and 19.7% (n = 1762) patients received both local anesthetics. Administration of any perioperative narcotic was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P = .001, 17.5% vs 21.7%) or only bupivacaine (P < .001, 17.5% vs 22.9%). Narcotic utilization on the day of surgery was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only lidocaine (P < .001, 11.5% vs 15.1%) or only bupivacaine (P = .004, 11.5% vs 14.6%). Narcotic utilization on the first postoperative day was significantly lower in patients receiving both lidocaine and bupivacaine than those receiving only bupivacaine (P = .009, 5.9% vs 8.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

In children undergoing cleft lip repair, local anesthetic combination of lidocaine and bupivacaine is associated with decreased perioperative narcotic use compared to lidocaine or bupivacaine alone.

Long-Term Nasolabial Appearance Post-Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair in a Single Center: A Descriptive Study

Introduction Modern treatments still aim to keep the impact of surgical intervention low and the outcome of surgeries as good as a surgeon can. Assessing the long-term nasolabial appearance of patients who underwent cleft lip (CL) repair surgery is one of the methods of evaluating the outcomes of cleft surgery. Methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study of data records of unilateral CL patients. The data records of all patients who underwent unilateral CL repair by the reconstructive science unit at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) within the first two years of their lives and whose current age is 14 years or above were accessed and analyzed. Results The data records of 50 patients were analyzed, including 13 (26%) males and 37 (74%) females. The surgeons opined that 28% of the patients had an acceptable nasolabial appearance, while there were 10 (20%) patients whose nasolabial appearance was considered unacceptable by the reviewing surgeons. Fifteen (30%) patients were described as having an acceptable lip appearance with secondary nasal deformity, and 11 (22%) patients had an acceptable nasal appearance with secondary lip deformity. There were no surgical modifications or postoperative complications among the patients. None of our variables reported a significant association with long-term nasolabial appearance. Conclusion The long-term evaluation of the nasolabial appearance in individuals with CL following surgical correction significantly improves the service and care provided to patients to achieve optimum results. Although our results showed no relationship between gender, age at operation, type or diagnosis of cleft, and family history and long-term nasolabial appearance, frequent assessments will enhance surgical results.

Number and timing of primary cleft lip and palate repair surgeries in England: whole nation study of electronic health records before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To quantify differences in number and timing of first primary cleft lip and palate (CLP) repair procedures during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021; 2020/2021) compared with the preceding year (1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020; 2019/2021).

DESIGN

National observational study of administrative hospital data.

SETTING

National Health Service hospitals in England.

STUDY POPULATION

Children <5 years undergoing primary repair for an orofacial cleft Population Consensus and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures-fourth revisions (OPCS-4) codes F031, F291).

MAIN EXPOSURE

Procedure date (2020/2021 vs 2019/2020).

MAIN OUTCOMES

Numbers and timing (age in months) of first primary CLP procedures.

RESULTS

1716 CLP primary repair procedures were included in the analysis. In 2020/2021, 774 CLP procedures were carried out compared with 942 in 2019/2020, a reduction of 17.8% (95% CI 9.5% to 25.4%). The reduction varied over time in 2020/2021, with no surgeries at all during the first 2 months (April and May 2020). Compared with 2019/2020, first primary lip repair procedures performed in 2020/2021 were delayed by 1.6 months on average (95% CI 0.9 to 2.2 months). Delays in primary palate repairs were smaller on average but varied across the nine geographical regions.

CONCLUSION

There were significant reductions in the number and delays in timing of first primary CLP repair procedures in England during the first year of the pandemic, which may affect long-term outcomes.

Does Early Referral Lead to Early Repair? Quality Improvement in Cleft Care

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip and palate is the most common congenital defect of the head and neck, occurring in 1 of 700 live births. Diagnosis often occurs in utero by conventional or 3-dimensional ultrasound. Early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (<3 months of life) for unilateral cleft lip (UCL), regardless of cleft width, has been the mainstay of lip reconstruction at Children's Hospital Los Angeles since 2015. Historically, traditional lip repair (TLR) was performed at 3 to 6 months of life ± preoperative nasoalveolar molding (NAM). Previous publications highlight the benefits of ECLR, such as enhanced aesthetic outcomes, decreased revision rate, better weight gain, increased alveolar cleft approximation, cost savings of NAM, and improved parent satisfaction. Occasionally, parents are referred for prenatal consultations to discuss ECLR. This study evaluates timing of cleft diagnosis, preoperative surgical consultation, and referral patterns to validate whether prenatal diagnosis and prenatal consultation lead to ECLR.

METHODS

Retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent ECLR versus TLR ± NAM from 2009 to 2020. Timing of repair, cleft diagnosis, and surgical consultation, as well as referral patterns, were abstracted. Inclusion criteria dictated: age < 3 months for ECLR or 3 to 6 months for TLR, no major comorbidities, and diagnosis of UCL without palatal involvement. Patients with bilateral cleft lip or craniofacial syndromes were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 107 patients, 51 (47.7%) underwent ECLR whereas 56 underwent TLR (52.3%). Average age at surgery was 31.8 days of life for the ECLR cohort and 112 days of life for the TLR cohort. Furthermore, 70.1% of patients were diagnosed prenatally, yet only 5.6% of families had prenatal consults for lip repair, 100% of which underwent ECLR. Most patients were referred by pediatricians (72.9%). Significance was identified between incidence of prenatal consults and ECLR (P = 0.008). In addition, prenatal diagnosis was significantly correlated with incidence of ECLR (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate significance between prenatal diagnosis of UCL and prenatal surgical consultation with incidence of ECLR. Accordingly, we advocate for education to referring providers about ECLR and the potential for prenatal surgical consultation in the hopes that families may enjoy the myriad benefits of ECLR.

The Rule of 10s for Cleft Repair: A Historical Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip is a ubiquitous maxillofacial birth defect encountered globally. Repair of this anomaly has been well established in the literature. Historically, studies have recommended initiating surgical repair by the "Rule of 10s." This states that a baby should be at least 10 weeks of age or older, achieve a weight of 10 pounds, have a hemoglobin exceeding 10 g/dL, and have a white blood cell count <10,000/mm 3 before undergoing surgery. However, with advances in both pediatric anesthesia and surgical technique, the concept of prioritizing earlier surgery requires a closer examination of this widespread concept.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the Rule of 10s for cleft lip repair and to determine whether plastic surgeons should continue to follow this as a strict rule or employ it as a guideline.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted by G.S., and reviewed by J.L. and M.K. All studies that addressed the "Rule of 10s" for cleft lip patients were considered. Articles were chosen from a comprehensive set of databases, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases in March 2022. A literature search was conducted using the following keywords: rule of 10s, Millard criteria, cleft lip/palate, cleft lip/palate repair, and cleft lip/palate complications. Reference lists of selected studies were reviewed for other appropriate publications. Meta-analyses, prospective, randomized clinical trials, retrospective reviews, letters, and literature reviews were included. Single case reports, non-English publications, animal studies, and comments were excluded.

RESULTS

Among the studies included in this review, the authors found that the Rule of 10s has undergone a limited evaluation within the context of today's advances in surgical technique and anesthesia. The current articles generally conclude surgeons may proceed with earlier cleft repair on otherwise healthy infants who do not meet all criteria of the Rule of 10s.

CONCLUSIONS

When taking into consideration the current advances in surgical technique and diminished risks of anesthesia, the Rule of 10s should be applied only as a guideline instead of a rule in plastic surgery. Surgeons should address each patient individually and adhere more rigidly to the Rule of 10s when the infant does not have characteristics warranting expedited repair.

Rethinking the Rule of 10s: Early Cleft Lip Repair Improves Weight Gain

OBJECTIVE

This study compares patients undergoing early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (<3-months) and traditional lip repair (TLR) (3-6 months) with/without nasoalveolar molding (NAM) to evaluate the effects of surgical timing on weight gain in hopes of guiding future treatment paradigms.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, California.

PATIENT, PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective chart review evaluated patients who underwent ECLR or TLR ± NAM from November 2009 through January 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

No intervention was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Patient demographics, birth and medical history, perioperative variables, and complications were collected. Infant weights and age-based percentiles were recorded at birth, surgery, 8-weeks, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postoperatively. The main outcomes were weight change and weight percentile amongst ECLR and TLR ± NAM groups.

RESULTS

107 patients met inclusion criteria: ECLR, n = 51 (47.6%); TLR + NAM, n = 35 (32.7%); and TLR-NAM, n = 21 (19.6%). ECLR patients had significantly greater changes in weight from surgery to 8-weeks and from surgery to 24-months postoperatively compared with both TLR ± NAM (P < .05). Age-matched weights in the ECLR group were significantly greater than TLR ± NAM at multiple time points postoperatively (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

ECLR significantly increased patient weights 24-months postoperatively when compared to TLR ± NAM. Specifically compared to TLR-NAM, ECLR weights were significantly greater at all time points past 6-months postoperatively. The results of this study demonstrate that ECLR can mitigate feeding difficulties and malnutrition traditionally seen in patients with cleft lip.

Age and indication for pediatric septoplasty in the NSQIP-P database

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric septoplasty has been a historically controversial topic in the field of otolaryngology. Past recommendations avoided reconstruction during development because of the potential for growth changes after intervention that may require later revision surgery. Recent studies have considered early operation to avoid further growth complications, pointing at changing trends in the field.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using the ACS NSQIP-P database to identify patients under 18 years of age who underwent a septoplasty between 2012 and 2019. Cases were identified using CPT code 30520 for 'septoplasty' and grouped by primary procedure as follows: cleft lip repair, sinus surgery, rhinoplasty/reconstruction/other, and septoplasty as primary procedure. Variables of interest included patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative risk factors and complications.

RESULTS

2290 patients were included with a mean age of 14.2 years at time of surgery. Patients undergoing cleft lip repair were significantly younger than patients in the other procedure groups (mean age 9.3 years, p < .001), with 28% of the patients under 1 year of age. The most common comorbidity was congenital malformation (20.0%) followed by asthma (10.2%). Significantly longer total length of hospital stay was associated with younger age (p < .001), female gender (p = .007), and perioperative comorbidities (p < .001). 8 (0.3%) patients were readmitted within 30 days for reasons related to the primary septoplasty surgery and 15 patients (0.7%) had related reoperations within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Septoplasty is currently being performed on children of all ages. Children undergoing cleft lip repair account for the youngest demographic of pediatric septoplasty patients. General complications such as readmission and length of stay are more common in younger children undergoing septoplasty, however the number of readmissions and reoperations is relatively low. Further study is needed to describe the association between pediatric septoplasty and long term health outcomes.

Anesthetic Implications of Common Congenital Anomalies

The most common congenital anomalies are congenital heart defects, cleft lip and palate, Down syndrome, and neural tube defects. Anesthetic considerations for Down syndrome include cervical spine instability, history of congenital heart disease, risk of bradycardia, hematologic, endocrine, and behavioral considerations. Patients with cleft lip and palate can have associated syndromes, and the potential for underlying abnormalities should be investigated prior to their anesthetic. A major anesthetic consideration for neural tube defect surgery is positioning for intubation. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele has been shown to reduce the need for ventriculoperitoneal shunting and improved motor outcomes.

Nasoalveolar Molding: Assessing the Burden of Care

ABSTRACT

Over the last 3 years a shift at our institution has taken place in which patients who would have been offered nasoalveolar molding (NAM) as an adjunct to cleft lip repair (repair after 3 months) have instead undergone early cleft lip repair (ECLR) (2-5 weeks of life) without NAM. This study sought to examine the financial and social impact of the transition away from NAM to ECLR. The efficacy of NAM is limited by patient compliance to a rigorous treatment schedule requiring weekly visits for appliance adjustments. Nasoalveolar molding patients required an average of 11 dental visits, accounting for $2132 in indirect lost income per family. Average direct charges for NAM totaled $12,290 for the hospital, physician, and appliance costs. Over the entire study period, the cumulative direct cost of NAM separate from the surgical repair of the lip was $970,910. Following the introduction of ECLR as an alternative to NAM with standard lip repair, NAM usage decreased by 48% and unilateral cleft lip patients undergoing NAM decreased by 86%. Those diverted from NAM to ECLR resulted in a decreased healthcare cost burden of $368,700 ($111,727 per year). In addition to the time burden, the financial burden of NAM is significant. Early cleft lip repair without NAM is more cost effective. Nasoalveolar molding has significantly decreased utilization since the implementation of ECLR. We believe that ECLR, with increased experience, long-term data, and increased awareness, has the potential to decrease the burden of health care costs in the United States.

A Meta-Analysis of Palatal Repair Timing

ABSTRACT

Developing midface hypoplasia is common after palatoplasty and has been hypothesized to be influenced by the timing of hard palate repair. This meta-analysis assesses the risk of developing midface hypoplasia based on age at hard palate repair. A Pubmed PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis was completed for literature focused on palatoplasty and midface hypoplasia published between 1970 and 2019. Cephalometric data were extracted and categorized by age at hard palate repair: <6, 7 to 12, 13 to 18, 19 to 24, and 25 to 83 months. Analysis of these groups and a control were compared using independent T-tests and Spearman correlation coefficients. SNA angles for each group were 77.9 ± 3.1° (<6 months), 77.7 ± 4.2° (7-12 months), 78.7 ± 4.2° (13-18 months), 75.1 ± 4.2° (19-24 months), 75.5 ± 4.8° (25-83 months), and were statistically different than the control group 82.4 ± 3.5° (P < 0.0001). Hard palate repair at 13 to 18 months had a statistically significant greater SNA angle than all other groups except for the repair at <6 months group (P = 0.074). As age at hard palate closure increased beyond 18 months, the SNA decreased, corresponding to a more hypoplastic maxilla (Spearman's correlation coefficient -0.381, P = 0.015). Analysis suggests that younger age at the time of repair is less likely to create in midface hypoplasia in adulthood. Minimizing midface hypoplasia in cleft palate patients by optimizing algorithms of care is a practical way to decrease the burden of disease on patients, families and medical systems. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of technique on outcomes.Level of Evidence: IV.

A Closer Look at Delayed Primary Cleft Surgery and Unrepaired Cleft Lip and/or Palate in 5 UK Cleft Centers

BACKGROUND

There may be many reasons for delays to primary cleft surgery. Our aim was to investigate the age of children undergoing primary cleft lip or primary cleft palate repair in 5 cleft centers within the United Kingdom. Identify the reasons for delayed primary cleft lip repair (beyond 6 months) and delayed primary palate repair (beyond 13 months). Identify children who had a cleft lip and/or palate (CL±P) that was intentionally unrepaired and the reasons for this.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter review of patients born with a CL±P between December 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. Three regional cleft centers, comprising of 5 cleft administrative units in the United Kingdom participated.

RESULTS

In all, 1826 patients with CL±P were identified. Of them, 120 patients had delayed lip repair, outside the expected standard of 183 days. And, 178 patients in total had delayed palate repair, outside the expected standard of 396 days. Twenty (1%) patients had an unrepaired cleft palate.

CONCLUSIONS

This large retrospective review highlights variations between centers regarding the timing of lip and palate surgery and details the reasons stated for delayed primary surgery. A small number of patients with an unrepaired cleft palate were identified. All had complex medical problems or comorbidities listed as a reason for the decision not to operate and 50% had a syndromic diagnosis. The number of patients receiving delayed surgery due to comorbidities, being underweight or prematurity, highlights the importance of the cleft specialist nurse and pediatrician within the cleft multidisciplinary team.

Exceptionally early tympanostomy tube placement in pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate

OBJECTIVE

At our institution, cleft lip repair is performed at or before 8 weeks of age, and tympanostomy tubes (TT) have been inserted concurrently in some of these patients. Our objective was to determine the feasibility and present the preliminary results of TT placement at this early age.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 22 patients born with cleft lip and/or palate who had TT placement in the first 8 weeks of life. Data collected included complications and audiologic function post TT placement.

RESULTS

Subjects had a mean age of 3.9 weeks at the time of TT placement and cleft lip repair. Thirteen patients (59%) reported otorrhea during the follow-up period. Eighteen of 21 (86%) patients who underwent auditory evaluation had normal audiological function following TT placement. One patient had sensorineural hearing loss and 2 patients had mild conductive hearing loss due to bilateral extruded TT and OME at 15.9 and 39.2 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Exceptionally early TT is feasible. Placing TT at or before 8 weeks of age did not result in any major complications but demonstrated a high incidence of otorrhea. A randomized, prospective study with a larger sample size is necessary to determine the benefits of TT placement at this age.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cleft Care

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic had multiple effects on the provision of health care, including the suspension of elective and nonessential surgeries. The objective of this study was to determine the early effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical care of patients with cleft lip and/or palate at a high-volume cleft center.

Methods

A retrospective comparative cohort study of patients with cleft lip and/or palate undergoing lip adhesion, cleft lip and nose repair, and palatoplasty before and during the pandemic was conducted. There were 50 patients in the prepandemic cohort and 53 in the pandemic cohort.

Results

Mean age at lip adhesion was 3.1 ± 1.1 months prepandemic (n = 8) and 3.5 ± 2.5 months in the pandemic cohort (n = 8) (P = 0.75). One lip adhesion was delayed by 1.6 months. Mean age at cleft lip and nose repair was 6.6 ± 1.9 months prepandemic (n = 23) and 8.0 ± 2.1 months in the pandemic cohort (n = 23) (P = 0.03). Six pandemic cleft lip and nose repairs were delayed; the mean delay was 2.6 ± 1.8 months. The mean age at palatoplasty was 13.9 ± 2.2 months prepandemic (n = 26) and 14.1 ± 2.9 months in the pandemic cohort (n = 26) (P = 0.79). Seven pandemic palatoplasties were delayed; the mean delay was 3.3 ± 1.4 months.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic caused delays at each stage of repair for cleft lip and/or palate-related procedures; however, only cleft lip and nose repair were significantly affected. This study emphasizes the importance of remaining vigilant regarding the care of this vulnerable population during this challenging time.

What is the Impact of Prenatal Counseling on Postnatal Cleft Treatment? Multidisciplinary Pathway for Prenatal Orofacial Cleft Care

ABSTRACT

In the pediatric general surgery literature, it has been shown that prenatal diagnosis of a congenital anomaly is an independent predictor of parental psychological distress. Surgical prenatal counseling can decrease parental anxiety by helping families understand the surgical needs and potential outcomes of their infant. In this retrospective analysis (n = 440), the authors sought to present our care pathway for prenatally diagnosed cleft lip and palate (CL/P) and explore the impact of cleft lip and palate-specific prenatal counseling on patient care by comparing the timing of clinical and surgical care between a cohort of patients who received prenatal CL/P consultation and a cohort of patients only seen postnatally. The authors hypothesize that our multidisciplinary prenatal care intervention is associated with earlier postnatal clinic visits and surgical repair. The care of all patients whose mother's presented for prenatal CL/P consultation (prenatal cohort, n = 118) was compared to all new CL/P patients without prenatal consultation at our institution (postnatal cohort, n = 322) from January 2015 through August 2019. 81.4% (n = 96) of the prenatal cohort returned for care postnatally while 2 pregnancies were interrupted, four neonates died, and 15 patients did not return for care. Prenatal consultation was associated with earlier postnatal clinic appointments (P < 0.001) as well as a shorter time to CL repair in patients with CL only (P = 0.002) and CLP (P = 0.047). Our described pre- and postnatal CL/P pathway is a multidisciplinary model associated with high retention rates from the prenatal period through complete surgical repair.

An overview of cleft lip and palate

Cleft lip and palate are types of craniofacial birth defects that affect thousands of children worldwide each year. These conditions are sensitive topics of conversations, often affected by the stigma of physical birth deformities and cultural myths. This article reviews the pathophysiology of cleft lip and palate, and describes the traditional management of patients with oral-facial clefts, including the extensive supportive care and an interprofessional team or cleft team approach that extends beyond the surgical correction.

Duration of Surgery, Ventilation, and Length of Hospital Stay Do Not Affect Breastfeeding in Newborns After Early Cleft Lip Repair

OBJECTIVE

There are minimal data available on nutrition after early repair of cleft lip and the factors influencing initiation of breastfeeding. This study assessed the impact of the length of surgery, length of ventilation support, and duration of hospital stay on breastfeeding rates after early cleft lip surgery.

DESIGN

This is a prospective observational cohort study comparing 2 hospitals providing early surgical repair of facial clefts from January 2014 to December 2016. Both hospitals are designated as Baby-Friendly Hospitals. Demographic and anthropometric data from mothers and newborns were recorded.

SETTING

Tertiary neonatal and pediatric surgery center.

PATIENTS

Hospital A: 61 newborns, Hospital B: 157 newborns.

INTERVENTIONS

Early (day 5 to 14) cheiloplasty in newborns with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Influence of duration of hospital stay, length of operation, and artificial ventilation on the rate of breastfeeding.

RESULTS

Significantly, more newborns were breastfed following early surgical repair of an isolated cleft lip compared to those with both cleft lip and palate, in both hospitals (hospital A 82% vs 0%, P = .0001, hospital B 66% vs 5%, P = .0001). Duration of hospital stay, length of operation, and duration of artificial ventilation did not significantly affect the rate of breastfeeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors associated with early cleft lip repair (length of operation, length of ventilation support, and duration of hospital stay) do not affect breastfeeding rate.

Cleft lip repair: are outcomes between unilateral and bilateral clefts comparable?

This study sought to compare patient demographics, operative course, and peri-operative outcomes between unilateral and bilateral cleft patients. Primary cleft lip repairs were isolated from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric Database (NSQIP-P). Unilateral and bilateral cases of primary cleft lip were identified by ICD codes. Demographics, comorbidities, and post-operative outcomes were compared between cohorts. Patients were propensity matched to control for differences before repeating the analysis. About 4550 cleft lip repairs were evaluated over the 5-year period. Of the cases where the cleft type was identifiable, 75.5% were unilateral clefts and 24.5% were bilateral clefts. The bilateral cleft population had significantly more comorbidities including higher rates of ventilator dependence (1.0% versus 0.4%, p = 0.02), asthma (1.6% versus 0.7%, p = 0.011), tracheostomy (1.6% versus 0.5%, p < 0.001), gastrointestinal disease (16.9% versus 12.7%, p < 0.001), previous cardiac surgery (3.6% versus 2.2%, p = 0.015), developmental delay (9.9% versus 4.6%, p < 0.001), structural central nervous system abnormalities (5.0% versus 2.5%, p < 0.001), and nutritional support (8.0% versus 3.2%, p < 0.001). Following propensity matching, there were no significant differences in complications, readmissions, or reoperations between the cohorts. Patients with bilateral cleft lip have significantly more comorbidities than unilateral cleft lip patients. However, peri-operative outcomes are comparable between the groups.

Tissue engineering strategies combining molecular targets against inflammation and fibrosis, and umbilical cord blood stem cells to improve hampered muscle and skin regeneration following cleft repair

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate is a congenital deformity that occurs in about 1 of 700 newborns, affecting the dentition, bone, skin, muscles and mucosa in the orofacial region. A cleft can give rise to problems with maxillofacial growth, dental development, speech, and eating, and can also cause hearing impairment. Surgical repair of the lip may lead to impaired regeneration of muscle and skin, fibrosis, and scar formation. This may result in hampered facial growth and dental development affecting oral function and lip and nose esthetics. Therefore, secondary surgery to correct the scar is often indicated. We will discuss the molecular and cellular pathways involved in facial and lip myogenesis, muscle anatomy in the normal and cleft lip, and complications following surgery. The aim of this review is to outline a novel molecular and cellular strategy to improve musculature and skin regeneration and to reduce scar formation following cleft repair. Orofacial clefting can be diagnosed in the fetus through prenatal ultrasound screening and allows planning for the harvesting of umbilical cord blood stem cells upon birth. Tissue engineering techniques using these cord blood stem cells and molecular targeting of inflammation and fibrosis during surgery may promote tissue regeneration. We expect that this novel strategy improves both muscle and skin regeneration, resulting in better function and esthetics after cleft repair.

Clinical Outcomes Utilizing a "Modified Latham" Appliance for Presurgical Infant Orthopedics in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

Presurgical infant orthopedic manipulation is utilized prior to cleft lip/nasal repair to facilitate a gingivoperiosteoplasty (GPP) and primary nasolabial repairs. The Latham dentomaxillary advancement appliance uses a screw that must be tightened daily to approximate the cleft segments in unilateral complete clefts. Our cleft center has been utilizing a "modified Latham" appliance since 1987, including an orthodontic elastic power chain to close the gap in a shorter amount of time. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing treatment at Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital (JHACH) with a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate between 1987 and 2017. Patients were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code (749.21). The majority of the patients represent the experience of the senior authors (E.R. and R.F.). Two hundred and eighty-one patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate were identified. Seventy-five patients were treated with a "modified Latham" appliance prior to their lip repair. The "modified Latham" appliance remained in place on average 20.6 days (range: 4-82), and average hospital stay after placement was 1.18 days. Nearly 96% of patients underwent a successful GPP at the time of nasolabial repair. Modification of the Latham appliance by utilizing an elastic power chain and eliminating the screw allows rapid closure of the alveolar cleft with limited need for adjustments and outpatient visits. Direct approximation of the palatal segments allows successful completion of a GPP in 95.9% of patients with limited dissection.

Primary Repair of Cleft Lip and Nose in the Neonatal Period

Facial cleft malformations belong to the most common problems of the congenital facial anomalies. At the Clinic of Plastic, Aestetic and Reconstructive Surgery at the Faculty Hospital in Banská Bystrica we have been performing primary cleft lip repairs during the first week of life of a newborn since 1995. During this life period the fetal healing still persists. Modern anesthetic techniques have considerably reduced respiratory complications after the lip closure. The adequate postoperative sedation together with monitoring of the pacient remarkably reduces the occurrence of wound dehiscence. The advantages of the neonatal cleft lip repair are the scarless healing, no negative effect on the growth of the middle thirt of the face, as well as the pschychosocial effect on the family and the fact that the ortodontic aparat has not been needed.

The Microsurgical Approach in Primary Cleft Rhinoplasty-An Anthropometric Analysis

PURPOSE

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons use different approaches to repair the nasal deformity of patients with a cleft lip deformity, differing in technique and timing. The aim of this longitudinal study was to analyze a new surgical technique to treat the cleft nasal deformity at 4 to 6 weeks of life using a microscope.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven newborn patients with a cleft lip deformity were treated by primary repair of the nasal deformity using a microscope at 4 to 6 weeks of life. The procedure includes a columellar incision, alar cartilage plication sutures according to Daniel (Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1491, 1999), and trans-columellar sutures. All patients were photographed at specific time points up to 1 year after surgery. Established angles and distances were analyzed and compared with normal values of age-matched children by Farkas (Anthropometry of the Head and Face [ed 2]. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1994).

RESULTS

All parameters improved through surgery and showed stable values at follow-up assessments. Almost ideal values concerning symmetry, as indicated by columellar deviation and nostril comparison, were obtained. Measurements of nasal morphology were similar to established norm values.

CONCLUSION

The authors recommend the early treatment of cleft nasal deformity using microscopic surgery because it shows stable and symmetrical results at least up to 1 year after surgery. Clinical observations up to adolescence suggest no growth disturbance or deterioration of nasal shape.