Cardiac Rehabilitation Improves Fitness in Patients With Subclinical Markers of Cardiotoxicity While Receiving Chemotherapy: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY

High-Intensity Interval Training for Cancer Patients: A Review of Key Considerations for Exercise Prescription

BACKGROUND

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) performed before, during, and after cancer treatment can attenuate the adverse effects induced by anti-cancer drugs. A clear presentation and rationale of characteristics of HIIT variables is vital to produce the expected HIIT adaptations in cancer patients. However, there are concerns regarding the HIIT protocols used in the cancer literature.

OBJECTIVES

The aims were to (1) identify the characteristics of HIIT and the formats that have been prescribed, (2) analyze which anchors have been utilized to prescribe effort and pause intensity, (3) examine characteristics of the physical tests used for HIIT prescription, and (4) identify potential adverse events related to HIIT intervention.

METHODS

This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies were retrieved, and the following results were found: (1) Only 25 studies reported all four essential variables for HIIT prescription [effort intensity (effort duration): pause intensity (pause duration)]. Of these studies, 23 used active pause and employed the following prescription (on average): [84% (116 s): 39% (118 s)] when percentage of maximal aerobic power (MAP) [maximal/peak oxygen uptake ( V O2max/peak)/MAP] was used; [124% (161 s): 55% (142 s)] when percentage of anaerobic threshold (AT) was used; [83% (230 s): 62% (165 s)] when maximal heart rate percentage (%HRmax) was used. From these 23 studies, 12 used V O2max/peak/MAP (one of the most recommended variables for HIIT prescription). Seven studies adopted the HIIT-long format, and in the remaining five studies, the format was unclear. (2) Twenty-four studies used fractions of V O2max/peak or mechanical variables like MAP as anchors for prescribing effort intensity, two studies used AT, 20 studies used fractions of HRmax/heart rate reserve, two studies used rate of perceived exertion (RPE), while one used RPE and % V O2peak concomitantly, and two studies utilized RPE/%HRmax concomitantly. Two studies utilized passive resting, 12 studies used % V O2peak/%MAP for prescribing pause intensity, four studies used AT, seven studies used %HRmax, one study used %HRmax/% V O2peak, and two studies used absolute loads. (3) Ten studies did not report the characteristics of the physical tests employed, two studies used submaximal tests, and 39 studies utilized graded exercise tests. (4) Ten studies did not report if there were adverse events associated with the exercise program, while 34 studies did not report any adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 50% of the studies provided all the necessary variables for accurate HIIT prescription, raising concerns about the replicability, comprehension, and effective application of HIIT in cancer patients. Most of the studies that reported all variables appeared to have employed the HIIT-long format. Only a few studies used more individualized anchors (e.g., AT) to prescribe HIIT-long format for cancer patients, which is considered a very heterogeneous population.

Effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation in cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate available data regarding the potential benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in cancer survivors.

METHODS

Relevant studies published from inception to April 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, CNKI, WanFang, VIP, and CBM databases. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 526 cancer survivors were included in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

CR increased muscle strength (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06 to 0.72, P = 0.020), quality of life (QoL) (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.82, P < 0.001), and led to a decrease in Body Mass Index (BMI) (mean difference (MD) = -1.11, 95% CI: -2.02 to -0.19, P = 0.020), total cholesterol (TC) (MD = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.69 to -0.14, P = 0.003), triglyceride (TG) (MD = -0.33, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.03, P = 0.030) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (MD = -0.34, 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.12, P = 0.003). The meta-analysis revealed that CR had no statistically significant impact on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

CR may represent an effective strategy to evaluate cancer survivors because it improves muscle strength and QoL and reduces BMI, TC, TG and LDL levels. Further RCTs with strict study designs and larger sample sizes are required to determine the effects of CR on cancer survivors.

New insights into cardioprotection in breast cancer patients undergoing physical exercise during chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy associated with breast cancer often induces cardiotoxicity, which compromises patients' health and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To verify the effect of physical exercise on chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity, through the assessment of cardiac function in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of physical training in chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy in the PubMed, Web of Sciences and Scopus databases. Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review and eleven studies in the data meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Global longitudinal strain presents a cardioprotective effect when compared to the control group (Heterogeneity: Chi² = 12.81, df = 10 (p = 0.23); I² = 22 %.) Test for global effect: Z = 2, 13 (p = 0.03). Physical training is more effective (test for subgroup differences, p = 0.031) in attenuating the impairment of %GLS induced by chemotherapy if performed concomitantly with exposure to chemotherapy (95 % CI; Heterogeneity: Chi² = 7.49, gl = 5 (p = 0.19); I² = 33 %; Test for global effect: Z = 2.33 (p = 0.02) when compared after chemotherapy treatment, or in the long term (for 12 months or more). However, without benefits in LVEF (Heterogeneity: Chi² = 42.14, df = 10 (p < 0.00001); I² = 76 %) Test for global effect: Z = 2.51 (p = 0.01) Conclusion: Exercise training is a cardioprotective approach in breast cancer patients who experience chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Exercise during exposure to chemotherapy has greater effects on preserving cardiac function.

Relevance of Cardiovascular Exercise in Cancer and Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) has been identified as a threat to overall and cancer-related survival. Although aerobic exercise training (AET) has been shown to improve cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), the relationship between specific exercise regimens and cancer survival, heart failure development, and reduction of CTRCD is unclear. In this review, we discuss the impact of AET on molecular pathways and the current literature of sports in the field of cardio-oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardio-oncological exercise trials have focused on variations of AET intensity by using moderate continuous and high intensity interval training, which are applicable, safe, and effective approaches to improve CRF. AET increases CRF, reduces cardiovascular morbidity and heart failure hospitalization and should thus be implemented as an adjunct to standard cancer therapy, although its long-term effect on CTRCD remains unknown. Despite modulating diverse molecular pathways, it remains unknown which exercise regimen, including variations of AET duration and frequency, is most suited to facilitate peripheral and central adaptations to exercise and improve survival in cancer patients.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients With and Without Cancer: Insights From Western Sydney

AIM

Increased cardiovascular events are common in cancer survivors and contribute to an emerging cardio-oncology patient group requiring secondary prevention strategies including cardiac rehabilitation (CR). This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes for patients participating in CR with and without an existing cancer diagnosis.

METHOD

Observational cohort study including consecutive patients enrolled in a single-centre outpatient CR program in Western Sydney between 2018-2022. Clinical history, demographics and CR outcome data were collected as part of standard care at program enrolment and completion. Patients with and without a cancer diagnosis were compared at enrolment and outcomes were analysed in both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1,792 patients enrolled in CR, 191 (11%) had a documented history of cancer; prostate (18%), skin (12%), colon (9%) and breast (8%) malignancies were most prevalent. The most common treatments were surgical resection (80%) and chemotherapy or radiotherapy (37%). Cardio-oncology patients were older (68.8±10.6 vs 59.8±13.7yrs, p<0.001), more likely female (33% vs 21%, p<0.001), born in Australia (46% vs 35%, p=0.004), non-partnered (34% vs 25%, p=0.002) and had a prior history of hypertension (65% vs 56%, p=0.010) or stroke (8% vs 5%, p=0.045). After adjusting for age and sex, the overall cohort improved their mean peak exercise capacity and waist circumference after CR, however there were no differences between groups. There were also no between-group differences for adherence and completion of CR program or any other cardiovascular risk factors. Sub-analyses revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in waist circumference for cancer patients with a history of radiation therapy and a blunted peak exercise capacity adaptation for those with a history of chemotherapy treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of CR patients with and without cancer, all patients showed significant and clinically relevant improvements in peak exercise capacity and waist circumference after CR. Results also highlighted potential associations between specific cancer treatments and changes in fitness outcomes, which warrants further evaluation.

The efficacy and safety of exercise regimens to mitigate chemotherapy cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Cardiotoxicity is one of the most common adverse events of the chemotherapy. Physical exercise was shown to be cardioprotective. We aim to estimate the efficacy and safety of exercise in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane, Clinical Trials.gov, and MedRxiv through July 17th, 2023. We used RevMan V. 5.4 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

PROSPERO ID

CRD42023460902.

RESULTS

We included thirteen RCTs with a total of 952 patients. Exercise significantly increased VO2 peak (MD: 1.95 with 95% CI [0.59, 3.32], P = 0.005). However, there was no significant effect regarding left ventricular ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain, cardiac output, stroke volume, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, E/A ratio, resting heart rate, peak heart rate, resting systolic blood pressure, and resting diastolic blood pressure. Also, there was no significant difference regarding any adverse events (AEs) (RR: 4.44 with 95% CI [0.47, 41.56], P = 0.19), AEs leading to withdrawal (RR: 2.87 with 95% CI [0.79, 10.43], P = 0.11), serious AEs (RR: 3.00 with 95% CI [0.14, 65.90], P = 0.49), or all-cause mortality (RR: 0.25 with 95% CI [0.03, 2.22], P = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

Exercise is associated with increased VO2 peak in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy. However, there was no significant difference between exercise and usual care regarding the echocardiographic and safety outcomes.

Effects of Physical Activity on Cardiotoxicity and Cardio respiratory Function in Cancer Survivors Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Physical activity, as a promising complementary therapy, has shown considerable potential for reducing chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity (CTRCT) and enhancing cardiorespiratory function (CRF). This study aimed to systematically assess the effects of physical activity on CTRCT and CRF in various cancer survivors receiving chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A literature search was conducted across 8 databases from inception to January 2024 and was limited to the English and Chinese languages. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 17.0 software. Results: Sixteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review and 15 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Among various cancer survivors undergoing chemotherapy, physical activity markedly increased absolute oxygen uptake (VO2peak or VO2max; WMD = 292.99, 95% confidence interval [CI]:87.87 to 498.12, P = .005), with significant effects of subgroup analysis at 4 to 10 weeks (P = .02) or over 16 weeks (P < .01), moderate-to-high or high intensity training (both P < .0001), patients with breast cancer (P = .009) and reported CTRCT (P = .007); relative VO2peak or VO2max(WMD = 3.30, 95%CI: 2.02 to 4.58, P < .00001), with significant effects of subgroup analysis at 10 to 16 weeks or over 16 weeks, moderate-to-high or high intensity training, patients with breast cancer, with or without reported CTRCT and exercise during chemotherapy (all P < .01); E/A values (WMD = 0.11, 95%CI:0.03 to 0.18, P = .007) and flow-mediated dilatation (WMD = 2.71, 95%CI:1.49 to 3.94, P < .0001). Compared to the control group, physical activity had no significant improvement in E/e' values (P = .50), NT-proBNP (P = .12), hs-cTn (P = 3.83), left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD = 2.89, 95%CI: -3.28 to 9.06, P = .36) with non-significant effects being independent of exercise intensity or duration, with or without CTRCT and cancer types (all P > .05), and global longitudinal strain (WMD = 0.37, 95%CI: -0.20 to 0.94, P = .20) with non-significant effects being independent of exercise duration and cancer types(both P > .05). Conclusions: Physical activity may be an effective complementary therapy to improve CRF and CTRCT in various cancer survivors, particularly during medium to long duration and moderate-to-high and high intensity exercise with concurrent chemotherapy.

A Review on the Role of Exercise Training to Prevent a Decline in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiac Function in Breast Cancer Survivors

PURPOSE

Improvements in diagnosis and treatment mean that the long-term health of breast cancer survivors (BCS) is increasingly dictated by cardiovascular comorbidities. This is partly a consequence of exposure to cardiotoxic therapies, which result in cardiac dysfunction and decreased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). Exercise training (ExT) is a key therapeutic strategy for secondary prevention and increasing CRF in adults with established cardiovascular disease. Exercise-based cardio-oncology rehabilitation (CORE) has been proposed as an emerging strategy to address CRF and cardiac impairment in BCS. This review aims to (1) provide an overview of the impact of breast cancer therapy on CRF; (2) provide an up-to-date summary of the effects of ExT on CRF and cardiac function in BCS undergoing cardiotoxic therapy; and (3) discuss how traditional ExT approaches can be adapted for BCS undergoing therapy.

REVIEW METHODS

A literature review was performed based on an intensive literature search for systematic reviews and meta-analyses, randomized and non-randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials investigating the impact of exercise training or cardiac rehabilitation on CRF and/or cardiac function in BCS who are undergoing or have completed cardiotoxic cancer therapy.

SUMMARY

Overall, current evidence suggests that ExT induces clinically meaningful benefits for CRF in BCS during and after therapy. There is also emerging evidence that ExT can improve peak exercise measures of cardiac function; however, there is a need for further research to understand how to adapt these effective ExT approaches into clinical CORE-based settings.

Supervised exercise training in patients with cancer during anthracycline-based chemotherapy to mitigate cardiotoxicity: a randomized-controlled-trial

Background

Exercise training (ET) has been shown to mitigate cardiotoxicity of anthracycline-based chemotherapies (AC) in animal models. Data from randomized controlled trials in patients with cancer are sparse.

Methods

Patients with breast cancer or lymphoma receiving AC were recruited from four cancer centres and randomly assigned to 3 months supervised ET. Primary outcome was change in left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) from baseline (before AC) to post AC (AC-end) compared between the EXduringAC group, who participated in an exercise intervention during AC including the provision of an activity tracker, and the control group EXpostAC, who received an activity tracker only. Secondary outcome parameters were changes in high sensitivity Troponin T (hsTnT), NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) and objectively measured physical activity (PA) during this same time-period. All assessments were repeated at a 12-week follow-up from AC-end, when also the EXpostAC group had completed the ET, that started after AC. In exploratory analyses, robust linear models were performed to assess the association of PA with changes in echocardiographic parameters and biomarkers of LV function.

Results

Fifty-seven patients (median age 47 years; 95% women) were randomized to EXduringAC (n = 28) and EXpostAC (n = 29) group. At AC-end, GLS deteriorated in both study groups (albeit insignificantly) with 7.4% and 1.0% in EXduringAC (n = 18) and EXpostAC (n = 18), respectively, and hsTnT and NT-proBNP significantly increased in both groups, without difference between groups for any parameter. Change in peak VO2 (-1.0 and -1.1 ml/kg/min) at AC-end was also similar between groups as was duration of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) with a median of 33 [26, 47] min/day and 32 [21, 59] min/day in the EXduringAC and EXpostAC group, respectively. In the robust linear model including the pooled patient population, MVPA was significantly associated with a more negative GLS and lesser increase in hsTnT at AC-end.

Conclusion

In this small scale RCT, supervised ET during AC was not superior to wearing a PA tracker to mitigate cardiotoxicity. The dose-response relationship between PA and cardioprotective effects during AC found in our and previous data supports the notion that PA should be recommended to patients undergoing AC.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03850171.

Updated systematic review of the effects of exercise on understudied health outcomes in cancer survivors

INTRODUCTION

The American College of Sports Medicine provided guidelines for exercise prescriptions in cancer survivors for specific cancer- and treatment-related health outcomes. However, there was insufficient evidence to generate exercise prescriptions for 10 health outcomes of cancer treatment. We sought to update the state of evidence.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of these 10 understudied health outcomes (bone health, sleep, cardiovascular function, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), cognitive function, falls and balance, nausea, pain, sexual function, and treatment tolerance) and provided an update of evidence.

RESULTS

While the evidence base for each outcome has increased, there remains insufficient evidence to generate exercise prescriptions. Common limitations observed across outcomes included: variability in type and quality of outcome measurement tools, variability in definitions of the health outcomes, a lack of phase III trials, and a majority of trials investigating breast or prostate cancer survivors only.

CONCLUSION

We identified progress in the field of exercise oncology for several understudied cancer- and treatment-related health outcomes. However, we were not able to generate exercise prescriptions due to continued insufficient evidence base. More work is needed to prescribe exercise as medicine for these understudied health outcomes, and our review highlights several strategies to aid in research acceleration within these areas of exercise oncology.

Incorporating Exercise Training into Cardio-Oncology Care: Current Evidence and Opportunities: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicities are an ongoing concern throughout the cancer care continuum from treatment initiation to survivorship. Several "standard-of-care" primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies are available to prevent the development or further progression of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicities and their risk factors. Despite exercise's established benefits on the cardiovascular system, it has not been widely adopted as a nonpharmacologic cardioprotective strategy within cardio-oncology care. In this state-of-the-art review, the authors discuss cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicities, review the existing evidence supporting the role of exercise in preventing and managing these sequelae in at-risk and affected individuals living after cancer diagnoses, and propose considerations for implementing exercise-based services in cardio-oncology practice.

Risk and Management of Patients with Cancer and Heart Disease

Cancer and cardiovascular disease are two of the leading causes of global mortality and morbidity. Medical research has generated powerful lifesaving treatments for patients with cancer; however, such treatments may sometimes be at the expense of the patient's myocardium, leading to heart failure. Anti-cancer drugs, including anthracyclines, can result in deleterious cardiac effects, significantly impacting patients' functional capacity, mental well-being, and quality of life. Recognizing this, recent international guidelines and expert papers published recommendations on risk stratification and care delivery, including that of cardio-oncology services. This review will summarize key evidence with a focus on anthracycline therapy, providing clinical guidance for the non-oncology professional caring for a patient with cancer and heart failure.

Mitochondrial protein dysfunction in pathogenesis of neurological diseases

Mitochondria are essential organelles for neuronal function and cell survival. Besides the well-known bioenergetics, additional mitochondrial roles in calcium signaling, lipid biogenesis, regulation of reactive oxygen species, and apoptosis are pivotal in diverse cellular processes. The mitochondrial proteome encompasses about 1,500 proteins encoded by both the nuclear DNA and the maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA. Mutations in the nuclear or mitochondrial genome, or combinations of both, can result in mitochondrial protein deficiencies and mitochondrial malfunction. Therefore, mitochondrial quality control by proteins involved in various surveillance mechanisms is critical for neuronal integrity and viability. Abnormal proteins involved in mitochondrial bioenergetics, dynamics, mitophagy, import machinery, ion channels, and mitochondrial DNA maintenance have been linked to the pathogenesis of a number of neurological diseases. The goal of this review is to give an overview of these pathways and to summarize the interconnections between mitochondrial protein dysfunction and neurological diseases.