European Society of Hypertension position paper on renal denervation 2021

Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Canada

AIMS

Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is an interventional treatment for uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis explored the therapy's lifetime cost-effectiveness in a Canadian healthcare setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model was used to project health events, costs, and quality-adjusted life years over a lifetime horizon. Seven primary health states were modeled, including hypertension alone, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and death. Multivariate risk equations and a meta-regression of hypertension trials informed transition probabilities. Contemporary clinical evidence from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial informed the base case treatment effect (-4.9 mmHg change in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) observed vs. sham control). Costs were sourced from published literature. A 1.5% discount rate was applied to costs and effects, and the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, RF RDN resulted in relative risk reduction in clinical events (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, and 0.72 for HF). Under the base case assumptions, RF RDN was found to add 0.51 (15.81 vs. 15.30) QALYs at an incremental cost of $6,031 ($73,971 vs. $67,040) over a lifetime, resulting in an ICER of $11,809 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness findings were found robust in sensitivity analyses, with the 95% confidence interval for the ICER based on 10,000 simulations ranging from $4,489 to $22,587 per QALY gained.

LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSION

Model projections suggest RF RDN, under assumed maintained treatment effect, is a cost-effective treatment strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the Canadian healthcare system based on meaningful reductions in clinical events.

The effect of renal denervation in microcirculation: focusing on coronary microvascular dysfunction

Arterial hypertension is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular pathologies worldwide. Considering the increased rates of uncontrolled hypertension and treatment non-adherence, catheter-based methods, with the most prominent being renal denervation, have been recently included in international guidelines for the management of the pathology, naming the method the third pillar in hypertension management. However, sympathetic overactivation is not only a major pathophysiologic driver in hypertension, but in other cardiovascular pathologies as well. Considering the effect of renal denervation in hypertension-mediated target organ damage, as well as the pleotropic effects of this modality, recent evidence have evaluated the modality in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Interestingly, despite preclinical data showcase a benefit of renal denervation in microcirculatory homeostasis, with enhancement of endothelial-mediated vasodilation and reduction of inflammation, these effects have failed to be translated into clinical benefit, with the limited, to date, non-interventional studies in coronary microcirculation reporting neutral effects. Therefore, this review aims to delineate the pathophysiological processes which relate microvascular dysfunction with hypertension, discuss the effect of the procedure in hypertension-mediated target organ damage, analyze preclinical and clinical data on the safety and efficacy of renal denervation in improving microcirculatory indices, as well as provide future directions for this novel field.

Impact of expected blood pressure reduction on patient preferences for pharmaceutical and renal denervation treatment

BACKGROUND

Effective patient-centered care requires an adequate understanding of patient preferences for different therapeutic options. We modelled patient preference for blood pressure (BP) management by pharmaceutical or interventional treatments such as renal denervation in patients with different profiles of uncontrolled hypertension.

METHODS

Modeling was based on the findings from a previously conducted quantitative discrete choice experiment (DCE). The likelihood of selecting either an interventional treatment option or additional antihypertensive medication option was calculated for three patient profiles that represent the range of patients with hypertension commonly encountered in clinical practice: treatment-naive, patients with uncontrolled BP while on one to three antihypertensive medications, and patients with drug-resistant hypertension. Variables in the preference model were treatment attributes from the DCE study: expected reduction in office SBP with each treatment, duration of treatment effect, risk of reversible drug side effects from drugs, and risk of temporary pain and/or bruising or vascular injury from interventions. Values of the variables were derived from published clinical studies or expert opinion.

RESULTS

The model predicted that the likelihood of choosing an intervention over initiating pharmacotherapy was 17.2% for previously untreated patients, 23.7% for patients with moderate hypertension currently on pharmacotherapy, and 41.8% for patients with drug-resistant hypertension. The dominant variable driving preference in these models was the expected BP reduction. Patient preferences for intervention are greater when drug nonadherence or increased SBP reduction at 3 vs. 1 year are included in the model. Baseline BP, drug side effects, or risks of the procedure had little influence on decisions.

CONCLUSION

Modeling using patient preference weights predicts that a substantial minority of patients favor an interventional treatment such as renal denervation over initiation or escalation of medications. Awareness of a patient's interest in device-based versus pharmaceutical strategies should inform the shared decision-making process for hypertension treatment.

Novel approaches to define responders to interventional treatment in hypertension: insights from the SPYRAL HTN-OFF and HTN-ON MED trials

Multiple sham-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated significant reductions in both office and 24-h blood pressure (BP) following radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) in the uncontrolled hypertension population. Notably, the blood pressure response varies widely within individual participants, thus showing a clinical need to identify potential RDN "responders" prior to the procedure. Despite multiple analytic efforts, no single parameter, aside from baseline blood pressure, has been consistently associated with BP reduction following RDN. However, this failure may be due to limitations in empiric definitions of responders. Indeed, commonly applied responder definitions based on the difference between two point-in-time BP measurements are fraught due to visit-to-visit variability in office and 24-h blood pressure endpoints. Several factors should be considered to develop a more clinically useful operational definition of procedural response including relative changes in office and 24-h BP, consideration of the temporal response to RDN, as well as adjustment for baseline BP. The current evidence may provide incentives for future expert consensus to precisely define responders to hypertension treatments.

Response of Blood Pressure to Renal Denervation Is Not Associated With Genetic Variants

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation lowers blood pressure (BP) in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. We conducted an unbiased genomic screen to identify genetic variants that may associate with BP response to renal denervation (RDN).

METHODS

Patients (n=268) with uncontrolled resistant hypertension (baseline BP, 166±21/90±15 mm Hg) who underwent endovascular RDN using the Symplicity catheter (Medtronic, Inc, Santa Rosa, CA) were included. Reduction in 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP was assessed at 6 months and divided into 2 groups: above and below the median response of 6.0 mm Hg, taking preintervention 24-hour ambulatory BP and regression to the mean into account. Whole exome sequencing assessing 249 669 variants, was conducted using Illumina NovaSeq technology read on a NovaSeq S4 Flow Cell device.

RESULTS

We did not identify individual gene variants associated with BP response following RDN. These findings were confirmed after adjustment for sex and in a sensitivity analysis looking at tertiles of BP response. We also explored specific variants in AGT, ADD1, ADRB1, ADRB2, and SCNN1A that have been proposed as potential candidate genes for response and found no association (all P>0.13). Gene ontology analysis of variants across the 2 responder groups highlighted differences in biologic processes such as cell adhesion and molecular function such as protein tyrosine kinase activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The response to RDN, in terms of 24-hour BP reduction, was not associated with the genetic profile of patients with resistant hypertension. These data do not support the use of a genetic score to identify potential responders to RDN.

Effects of renal denervation on the course of cardiorenal syndrome: insight from studies with fawn-hooded hypertensive rats

Combination of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF) results in extremely high morbidity and mortality. The current guideline-directed medical therapy is rarely effective and new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed. The study was designed to examine if renal denervation (RDN) will exhibit long-standing beneficial effects on the HF- and CKD-related morbidity and mortality. Fawn-hooded hypertensive rats (FHH) served as a genetic model of CKD and fawn-hooded low-pressure rats (FHL) without CKD served as controls. HF was induced by creation of aorto-caval fistula (ACF). RDN was performed 28 days after creation of ACF and the follow-up period was 70 days. ACF FHH subjected to sham-RDN had survival rate of 34 % i.e. significantly lower than 79 % observed in sham-denervated ACF FHL. RDN did not improve the condition and the final survival rate, both in ACF FHL and in ACF FHH. In FHH basal albuminuria was markedly higher than in FHL, and further increased throughout the study. RDN did not lower albuminuria and did not reduce renal glomerular damage in FHH. In these rats creation of ACF resulted in marked bilateral cardiac hypertrophy and alterations of cardiac connexin-43, however, RDN did not modify any of the cardiac parameters. Our present results further support the notion that kidney damage aggravates the HF-related morbidity and mortality. Moreover, it is clear that in the ACF FHH model of combined CKD and HF, RDN does not exhibit any important renoprotective or cardioprotective effects and does not reduce mortality. Key words Chronic kidney disease, Heart failure, Renal denervation, Fawn-hooded hypertensive rats.

Cost-effectiveness of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension: an analysis for the UK based on recent clinical evidence

AIMS

Catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) has recently been approved for clinical use in the European Society of Hypertension guidelines and by the US Food and Drug Administration. This study evaluated the lifetime cost-effectiveness of RF RDN using contemporary evidence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A decision-analytic model based on multivariate risk equations projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs. The model consisted of seven health states: hypertension alone, myocardial infarction (MI), other symptomatic coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure (HF), end-stage renal disease, and death. Risk reduction associated with changes in office systolic blood pressure (oSBP) was estimated based on a published meta-regression of hypertension trials. The base case effect size of -4.9 mmHg oSBP (observed vs. sham control) was taken from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial of 337 patients. Costs were based on National Health Service England data. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000-30 000 per QALY gained. Extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted, including the ON-MED subgroup on three medications and pooled effect sizes. RF RDN resulted in a relative risk reduction in clinical events over 10 years (0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for MI, 0.72 for HF), with an increase in health benefit over a patient's lifetime, adding 0.35 QALYs at a cost of £4763, giving an ICER of £13 482 per QALY gained. Findings were robust across tested scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Catheter-based radiofrequency RDN can be a cost-effective strategy for uncontrolled hypertension in the UK, with an ICER substantially below the NICE cost-effectiveness threshold.

Cost-Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Renal Denervation for Uncontrolled Hypertension in Japan

Radiofrequency renal denervation (RF RDN) is a novel therapy for uncontrolled hypertension. In the recent sham-controlled SPYRAL HTN-ON MED study, office-based systolic blood pressure (oSBP) and nighttime BP were reduced significantly. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of RF RDN in the context of the Japanese healthcare system based on this latest clinical evidence. Clinical events, costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were projected using a decision-analytic Markov model adjusted to Japanese incidence data. Risk reduction in clinical events from changes in oSBP was calculated based on a published meta-regression of 47 trials of intentional hypertension treatment. Demographics and results from the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (oSBP effect size -4.9 mmHg vs. sham) were utilized in the base case analysis. Additional scenarios were explored including the potential added benefit of improved night-time control. Costs were sourced from claims data and published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was evaluated against a cost-effectiveness threshold of ¥5 000 000 per QALY gained. RF RDN was projected to reduce clinical events (10-year relative risks: 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.75 for heart failure). Over lifetime, RF RDN added 0.36 QALYs at the incremental cost of ¥923 723, resulting in an ICER of ¥2 565 236 per QALY gained. Under the assumption of added night-time benefit, the ICER decreased to ¥2 155 895 per QALY. Cost-effectiveness findings were robust across all tested scenarios. The findings of this model-based analysis suggest that RF RDN can provide meaningful clinical event reductions and is a cost-effective treatment option in the Japanese healthcare system.

Echocardiographic findings following renal sympathetic denervation for treatment resistant hypertension, the ReShape CV-risk study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe and compare echocardiographic findings before renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) and 6 and 24 months after the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) were included in this non-randomised intervention study. RDN was performed by a single experienced operator using the Symplicity Catheter System. Echocardiographic measurements were performed at baseline, and after 6 and 24 months.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 21 patients with TRH, with a mean systolic office blood pressure (BP) of 163 mmHg and mean diastolic BP 109 mmHg. Mixed model analysis showed no significant change in left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) or left atrium volume index (LAVI) after the RDN procedure. Higher LVMI at baseline was significantly associated with greater reduction in LVMI (p < 0.001). Relative wall thickness (RWT) increased over time (0.48 mm after two years) regardless of change in BP. There was a small but significant reduction in LV end-diastolic (LVIDd) and end-systolic (LVIDs) diameters after RDN, with a mean reduction of 2.6 and 2.4 mm, respectively, after two years. Progression to concentric hypertrophy was observed only in in patients who did not achieve normal BP values, despite BP reduction after RDN.

CONCLUSION

There was no reduction of LV mass after RDN. We found a small statistically significant reduction in LVIDd and LVIDs, which together with increase in RWT can indicate progression towards concentric hypertrophy. BP reduction after RDN on its own does not reverse concentric remodelling if target BP is not achieved.

Consensus statement on renal denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: 1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or 2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Consensus statement on renal denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: (1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or (2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Consensus Statement on Renal Denervation by the Joint Committee of Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH), Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT), and the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS)

This is the first consensus statement of the Joint Committee on Renal Denervation of the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH)/Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT)/Japanese Circulation Society (JCS). The consensus is that the indication for renal denervation (RDN) is resistant hypertension or "conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension, with high office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) readings despite appropriate lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drug therapy. "Conditioned" uncontrolled hypertension is defined as having one of the following: 1) inability to up-titrate antihypertensive medication due to side effects, the presence of complications, or reduced quality of life. This includes patients who are intolerant of antihypertensive drugs; or 2) comorbidity at high cardiovascular risk due to increased sympathetic nerve activity, such as orthostatic hypertension, morning hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, or sleep apnea (unable to use continuous positive airway pressure), atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmia, or heart failure. RDN should be performed by the multidisciplinary Hypertension Renal Denervation Treatment (HRT) team, led by specialists in hypertension, cardiovascular intervention and cardiology, in specialized centers validated by JSH, CVIT, and JCS. The HRT team reviews lifestyle modifications and medication, and the patient profile, then determines the presence of an indication of RDN based on shared decision making with each patient. Once approval for real-world clinical use in Japan, however, the joint RDN committee will update the indication and treatment implementation guidance as appropriate (annually if necessary) based on future real-world evidence.

Renal sympathetic denervation 2024 in Austria: recommendations from the Austrian Society of Hypertension : Endorsed by the Austrian Society of Nephrology and the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology of the Austrian Society of Cardiology

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is an interventional supplement to medical treatment in patients with arterial hypertension. While the first sham-controlled trial, SYMPLICITY HTN‑3 was neutral, with improved procedural details, patient selection and follow-up, recent randomized sham-controlled trials of second-generation devices show a consistent blood pressure lowering effect of RDN, as compared to sham controls. These new data and the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) premarket approval of two RDN devices are the basis for the present recommendations update.This joint position paper from the Austrian Society of Hypertension, together with the Austrian Society of Nephrology and the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology from the Austrian Society of Cardiology includes an overview about the available evidence on RDN and gives specific recommendations for the work-up, patient selection, pretreatment, procedural management and follow-up in patients undergoing RDN in Austria. Specifically, RDN may be used in clinical routine care, together with lifestyle measures and antihypertensive drugs, in patients with resistant hypertension (i.e. uncontrolled blood pressure on 3 antihypertensive drugs) and in those with uncontrolled hypertension, after adequate work-up, if institutional, patient-related and procedural conditions are fulfilled.

Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) and Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) Position Paper on the role of renal denervation in the management of the difficult-to-treat hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension. The blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of RDN is comparable to those of many single antihypertensive medications and it allows to consider the RDN as a valuable option for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension together with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. A multidisciplinary team is of pivotal importance from the selection of the patient candidate for the procedure to the post-procedural management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of RDN on clinical outcomes and to better identify the predictors of BP response to RDN in order to recognize the patients who are more likely to benefit from the procedure.

Long-Term Blood Pressure Reductions Following Catheter-Based Renal Denervation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Renal denervation is a recognized adjunct therapy for hypertension with clinically significant blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects. Long-term follow-up data are critical to ascertain durability of the effect and safety. Aside from the 36-month follow-up data available from randomized control trials, recent cohort analyses extended follow-up out to 10 years. We sought to analyze study-level data and quantify the ambulatory BP reduction of renal denervation across contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials and available long-term follow-up data up to 10 years from observational studies.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed with data from 4 observational studies with follow-up out to 10 years and 2 randomized controlled trials meeting search and inclusion criteria with follow-up data out to 36 months. Study-level data were extracted and compared statistically.

RESULTS

In 2 contemporary randomized controlled trials with 36-month follow-up, an average sham-adjusted ambulatory systolic BP reduction of -12.7±4.5 mm Hg from baseline was observed (P=0.05). Likewise, a -14.8±3.4 mm Hg ambulatory systolic BP reduction was found across observational studies with a mean long-term follow-up of 7.7±2.8 years (range, 3.5-9.4 years; P=0.0051). The observed reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate across the long-term follow-up was in line with the predicted age-related decline. Antihypertensive drug burden was similar at baseline and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal denervation is associated with a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in ambulatory systolic BP in both contemporary randomized sham-controlled trials up to 36 months and observational cohort studies up to 10 years without adverse consequences on renal function.

Impact of renal denervation on patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction: study rationale and design

AIMS

Long-standing hypertension may cause an impairment in microvascular coronary circulation, which is involved in many different cardiac conditions. Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been successfully proven as a valuable therapeutic choice for patients with resistant hypertension; moreover, the procedure looks promising in other settings, such as heart failure and atrial fibrillation, given its ability to downregulate the sympathetic nervous system, which is a recognized driver in these conditions as well as in microvascular dysfunction progression. The aim of this study is to explore the effect of RDN on coronary physiology in patients with ascertained coronary microvascular dysfunction and resistant hypertension.

METHODS

This is a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, interventional study. Consecutive patients with resistant hypertension, nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) and documented microvascular dysfunction will be enrolled. Patients will undergo RDN by Spyral Symplicity 3 (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) and reassessment of coronary microvascular function 6 months after the procedure. Primary endpoint will be the difference in the index of microcirculatory resistance.

CONCLUSION

The IMPRESSION study seeks to evaluate if there is any pleiotropic effect of the RDN procedure that results in modulation of microvascular function; if observed, this would be the first evidence showing RDN as a valuable therapy to revert hypertension-related microvascular dysfunction.

Features of The Dynamics of Profibrotic Markers and Regression of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy After Renal Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension and Stenosing Atherosclerosis of the Coronary Arteries

AIM

To compare the changes in serum concentrations of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their tissue inhibitor (TIMP) to the dynamics of blood pressure (BP) and parameters of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) 6 months after renal denervation (RD) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension (RAH) and complicated coronary atherosclerosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 22 RAH patients with complicated coronary atherosclerosis (revascularization and/or history of myocardial infarction (MI)), 24-hour BP monitoring, echocardiography, and measurement of blood MMPs and TIMP were performed at baseline and six months after RD. The comparison group consisted of 48 RAH patients without a history of coronary revascularization or MI.

RESULTS

In 6 months after RD, BP was decreased comparably in both groups. In the group of complicated atherosclerosis, there were no significant changes in profibrotic markers or LVH parameters. Thus, at baseline and after 6 months, the values of the studied indicators were the following: left ventricular myocardial mass (LVMM) 233.1±48.1 and 243.0±52.0 g, LVMM index 60.6±14.5 and 62.8±10 .9 g/m2.7, proMMP-1 4.9 [2.1; 7.7] and 3.6 [2.0; 9.4]  ng/ml, MMP-2 290.4 [233.1; 352.5] and 352.2 [277.4; 402.9] ng/ml, MMP-9 220.6 [126.9; 476.7] and 263.5 [82.9; 726.2] ng/ml, TIMP-1 395.7 [124.7; 591.4] and 424.2 [118.2; 572.0] ng/ml, respectively. In the comparison group, on the contrary, there was a significant decrease in LVMM from 273.6±83.3 g to 254.1±70.4 g, LVMM index from 67.1±12.3 to 64.0±14.4 g/m2.7, proMMP-1 from 7.2 [3.6; 11.7] to 5.9 [3.5; 10.9] ng/ml, MMP-2 from 328.9 [257.1; 378.1] to 272.8 [230.2; 343.2] ng/ml, MMP-9 from 277.9 [137.0; 524.0] to 85.5 [34.2; 225.9] ng/ml, and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio from 0.80 [0.31; 1.30] to 0.24 [0.07; 0.76]. The BP dynamics in this group was inversely correlated with MMP-2 at 6 months (r=-0.38), and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio was correlated with LVMM and the LVMM index at baseline (r=0.39 and r=0.39) and at 6 months (r=0.37 and r=0.32). The change in TIMP-1 from 543.9 [277.5; 674.1] to 469.8 [289.7; 643.6] ng/ml was not significant (p=0.060).

CONCLUSION

In RAH patients with complicated coronary atherosclerosis, the dynamics of profibrotic biomarkers and LVH parameters after RD was absent despite the pronounced antihypertensive effect, probably due to the low reversibility of cardiovascular remodeling processes or more complex regulatory mechanisms of the MMP system.

Unravelling the effect of renal denervation on glucose homeostasis: more questions than answers?

Renal Denervation (RDN) is an interventional, endovascular procedure used for the management of hypertension. The procedure itself aims to ablate the renal sympathetic nerves and to interrupt the renal sympathetic nervous system overactivation, thus decreasing blood pressure (BP) levels and total sympathetic drive in the body. Recent favorable evidence for RDN resulted in the procedure being included in the recent European Guidelines for the management of Hypertension, while RDN is considered the third pillar, along with pharmacotherapy, for managing hypertension. Sympathetic overactivation, however, is associated with numerous other pathologies, including diabetes, metabolic syndrome and glycemic control, which are linked to adverse cardiovascular health and outcomes. Therefore, RDN, via ameliorating sympathetic response, could be also proven beneficial for maintaining an euglycemic status in patients with cardiovascular disease, alongside its BP-lowering effects. Several studies have aimed, over the years, to provide evidence regarding the pathophysiological effects of RDN in glucose homeostasis as well as investigate the potential clinical benefits of the procedure in glucose and insulin homeostasis. The purpose of this review is, thus, to analyze the pathophysiological links between the autonomous nervous system and glycemic control, as well as provide an overview of the available preclinical and clinical data regarding the effect of RDN in glycemic control.

Impact of renal denervation on cardiac remodeling in resistant hypertension: A meta-analysis

Twelve studies involving 433 patients were included. After RDN treatment, LVMI decreased by 13.08 g/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -18.38, -7.78; p < .00001), PWTd decreased by 0.60 mm (95% CI: -0.87, -0.34; p < .00001), IVSTd decreased by 0.78 mm (95% CI: -1.06, -0.49; p < .00001), and LVEF increased by 1.80% (95% CI: 0.71, 2.90; p = .001). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in LVIDd (95% CI: -1.40, 0.24; p = .17) and diastolic function (E/A) (95% CI: -0.04, 0.14; p = .28). Drug treatment for resistant hypertension (RH) is challenging. Renal denervation (RDN) is one of the most promising treatments for RH. Although studies have shown RDN can control blood pressure, the impacts of RDN on cardiac remodeling and cardiac function are unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated the effect of RDN on cardiac structure and function in patients with RH. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were used to conduct a systematic search. The main inclusion criteria were studies on patients with RH who received RDN and reported the changes in echocardiographic parameters before and after RDN. Echocardiographic parameters included left ventricular mass index (LVMI), end-diastolic left ventricular internal dimension (LVIDd), left ventricular end-diastolic posterior wall thickness (PWTd), end-diastolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSTd), E/A, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Data was analyzed using RevMan. Twelve studies involving 433 patients were included. After RDN treatment, LVMI decreased by 13.08g/m2 (95%confidence interval [CI]: -18.38, -7.78, p < .00001), PWTd decreased by 0.60mm (95% CI: -0.87, -0.34, p < 0.00001), IVSTd decreased by 0.78mm (95% CI: -1.06, -0.49, p < .00001), and LVEF increased by 1.80% (95% CI: 0.71, 2.90, p = .001). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in LVIDd (95% CI: -1.40, 0.24, p = .17) and diastolic function (E/A) (95% CI: -0.04, 0.14, p =.28). This meta-analysis finds that RDN can improve left ventricular hypertrophy and ejection fraction in patients with RH but has no significant effect on LVIDd and diastolic function. However, more studies are warranted due to the lack of a strict control group, a limited sample size, and research heterogeneity.

Skin sodium content as a predictor of blood pressure response to renal denervation

Patients with treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) are known to have elevated sodium (Na) content in muscle and skin. Renal denervation (RDN) emerged as an adjacent therapeutic option in this group of patients. This analysis aimed at evaluating whether tissue Na content predicts blood pressure (BP) response after RDN in patients with TRH. Radiofrequency-device based RDN was performed in 58 patients with uncontrolled TRH. Office and 24-h ambulatory BP were measured at baseline and after 6 months. To assess tissue Na content Na magnetic resonance imaging (Na-MRI) was performed at baseline prior to RDN. We splitted the study cohort into responders and non-responders based on the median of systolic 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) reduction after 6 months and evaluated the association between BP response to RDN and tissue Na content in skin and muscle. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01687725). Six months after RDN 24-h ABP decreased by -8.6/-4.7 mmHg. BP-Responders were characterized by the following parameters: low tissue sodium content in the skin (p = 0.040), female gender (p = 0.027), intake of aldosterone antagonists (p = 0.032), high baseline 24-h night-time heart rate (p = 0.045) and high LDL cholesterol (p < 0.001). These results remained significant after adjustment for baseline 24-h systolic BP. Similar results were obtained when the median of day-time and night-time ABP reduction after 6 months were used as cut-off criteria for defining BP response to RDN. We conclude that in addition to clinical factors including baseline 24-h ABP Na-MRI may assist to select patients with uncontrolled TRH for RDN treatment.

Blood pressure reduction after renal denervation in patients with or without chronic kidney disease

Background

Renal denervation (RDN) has emerged as an adjacent option for the treatment of hypertension. This analysis of the Erlanger registry aimed to compare the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects and safety of RDN in patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

In this single-center retrospective analysis, 47 patients with and 127 without CKD underwent radiofrequency-, ultrasound- or alcohol-infusion-based RDN. Office and 24-h ambulatory BP and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months.

Results

A total of 174 patients with a mean age of 59.0 ± 10 years were followed up for 12 months. At baseline, mean eGFR was 55.8 ± 21 mL/min/1.73 m2 in patients with CKD and 87.3 ± 13 mL/min/1.73 m2 in patients without CKD. There was no significant eGFR decline in either of the groups during 12 months of follow-up. In patients without CKD, office systolic and diastolic BP were reduced by -15.3 ± 17.5/-7.9 ± 10.8 mmHg 6 months after RDN and by -16.1 ± 18.2/-7.7 ± 9.6 mmHg 12 months after RDN. In patients with CKD, office systolic and diastolic BP were reduced by -10.7 ± 24.0/-5.8 ± 13.2 mmHg 6 months after RDN and by -15.1 ± 24.9/-5.9 ± 12.9 mmHg 12 months after RDN. Accordingly, in patients without CKD, 24-h ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP were reduced by -7.2 ± 15.8/-4.9 ± 8.8 mmHg 6 months after RDN and by -9.0 ± 17.0/-6.2 ± 9.8 mmHg 12 months after RDN. In patients with CKD, 24-h systolic and diastolic BP were reduced by -7.4 ± 12.9/-4.2 ± 9.9 mmHg 6 months after RDN and by -8.0 ± 14.0/-3.6 ± 9.6 mmHg 12 months after RDN. There was no difference in the reduction of office and 24-h ambulatory BP between the two groups at any time point (all P > .2). Similar results have been found for the 6 months data. With exception of rare local adverse events, we did not observe any safety signals.

Conclusion

According to our single-center experience, we observed a similar reduction in 24-h, day and night-time ambulatory BP as well as in-office BP in patients with and without CKD at any time point up to 12 months. We conclude that RDN is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with hypertension and CKD.

Renal Denervation in End-Stage Renal Disease: Current Evidence and Perspectives

In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing haemodialysis, hypertension is of common detection and frequently inadequately controlled. Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in the development and progression of the ESRD-related high blood pressure state, which has been implicated in the increased cardiovascular risk reported in this hypertensive clinical phenotype. Renal sympathetic efferent and afferent nerves play a relevant role in the development and progression of elevated blood pressure values in patients with ESRD, often leading to resistant hypertension. Catheter-based bilateral renal nerves ablation has been shown to exert blood pressure lowering effects in resistant hypertensive patients with normal kidney function. Promising data on the procedure in ESRD patients with resistant hypertension have been reported in small scale pilot studies. Denervation of the native non-functioning kidney's neural excitatory influences on central sympathetic drive could reduce the elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality seen in ESRD patients. The present review article will focus on the promising results obtained with renal denervation in patients with ESRD, its mechanisms of action and future perspectives in these high risk patients.

2023 update and perspectives

Total 276 manuscripts were published in Hypertension Research in 2022. Here our editorial members picked up the excellent papers, summarized the current topics from the published papers and discussed future perspectives in the sixteen fields. We hope you enjoy our special feature, 2023 update and perspectives in Hypertension Research.

Current problems in renal denervation and a hope to break the stage

Renal denervation (RDN) is currently confronted with the considerable heterogeneity of different post-procedural blood pressure responses. The challenges predominantly arise from not only the lack of selection of appropriate responders but also the absence of detection for the successful endpoints of intervention. In this paper, we summarize the significant characteristics of potentially appropriate hypertensive patients and propose a hopeful way to improve the accuracy of RDN, that is, the application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology combined with electrical renal nerve stimulation to guide the radiofrequency catheter ablation, which may promote the development of selective and accurate RDN in real-world clinical practice. This paper focuses on two current critical concerns of renal denervation (RDN): appropriate patient selection and the improvement in the accuracy of selective RDN. A hopeful way of accurate RDN may be the combination of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems for the renal artery with modified renal nerve stimulation (RNS) techniques and technology for appropriate hypertensive candidates.

Late outcomes of renal denervation are more favourable than early ones: facts or fancies?

Following second-generation randomized trials, there is evidence that renal denervation (RDN) decreases blood pressure (BP), although to a lesser extent than suggested in the initial controlled and observational studies. The recent publication of the 36-month follow-up of the Symplicity HTN-3 trial has raised expectations, suggesting increasing, late benefits of the procedure, despite initially negative results. These findings come after those obtained at 36 months in the sham-controlled trial SPYRAL HTN-ON MED and in the Global Symplicity Registry. However, they are susceptible to biases inherent in observational studies (after unblinding for sham-control) and non-random, substantial attrition of treatment groups at 36 months, and used interpolation of missing BPs. More importantly, in SPYRAL HTN-ON MED and Symplicity HTN-3, long-term BP changes in patients from the initial RDN group were compared with those in a heterogeneous control group, including both control patients who did not benefit from RDN and patients who eventually crossed over to RDN. In crossover patients, the last BP before RDN was imputed to subsequent follow-up. In Symplicity HTN-3, this particular approach led to the claim of increasing long-term benefits of RDN. However, comparison of BP changes in patients from the RDN group and control patients who did not undergo RDN, without imputation of BPs from crossover patients, does not support this view. The good news is that despite the suggestion of sympathetic nerve regrowth after RDN in some animal models, there is no strong signal in favour of a decreasing effect of RDN over time, up to 24 or even 36 months. Still, current data do not support a long-term increase in the effect of RDN and the durability of RDN-related BP reduction remains to be formally demonstrated.

Progression of obstructive sleep apnoea after renal denervation is not associated with hypertension exaggeration

PURPOSE

In a cohort, observational prospective trial, we assessed the long-term dynamics of sleep-disordered breathing in patients with resistant hypertension after renal denervation and their association with blood pressure change at remote follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with stable hypertension who were recruited for endovascular radiofrequency renal denervation in 2012-2019 and had valid both baseline and follow-up sleep study, were included in the analysis. All patients underwent physical examination, anthropometry, office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements, blood and urine tests, kidney visualization, and full polysomnography before and within 12-36 months after renal denervation.

RESULTS

The average follow-up comprised 30.1 ± 8.4 months. At long-term follow-up, no significant changes in creatinine level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, body mass index were registered. There was a significant increase in sleep apnea severity indices: the mean change in apnea-hypopnea index comprised 9.0(-21.1;25.2) episodes/h, in oxygen desaturation index 6.5(-16.8;35.9) episodes/h, in the average SpO2 -1.7(-5.6;1.9)%. Over 12-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in blood pressure response in patients with and without sleep apnea. The baseline apnea-hypopnea and oxygen desaturation indices and the mean SpO2 were associated with the circadian blood pressure profile at follow-up, but did not correlate with the blood pressure response.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the severity of sleep apnea worsens at > 12 months follow-up after renal denervation, this is not associated with hypertension exaggeration.

Resistant Hypertension and Related Outcomes in a Cohort of Patients with Cardiorenal Multimorbidity Hospitalized in an Internal Medicine Ward

INTRODUCTION

Resistant hypertension (RH) is characterized by the failure to reach a goal blood pressure despite the administration of three medications at maximally tolerated doses, one of which being a diuretic. RH can be observed in a variety of clinical conditions, such as heart failure and reduced renal function and may confer high cardiovascular risk.

AIM

To evaluate the prevalence of RH and its association with clinical outcomes; the primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the composite outcome was all-cause of mortality and morbidity in a cohort of patients with cardiorenal multimorbidity hospitalized in an internal medicine ward.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive hypertensive patients with cardiorenal multimorbidity. The composite outcome incorporated all-cause of in-hospital mortality and occurrence of sepsis, pulmonary embolism, acute coronary syndrome, stroke and renal replacement therapy.

RESULTS

We collected data in 141 inpatients with a mean age of 77 years ± 10 (males 65.9 %), estimated glomerular filtration rate of 34 ± 18.6 ml/min with length of stay of 17 ± 12 days. The prevalence of RH was 52.4%. In-hospital mortality was observed in 24 patients (17%) and the composite outcome occurred in 87 patients (61.7%) and among these 74 (85.1%) were patients with RH. Free survival for composite outcome was significantly higher in patients without RH than patients with RH (log rank 7.52, p = 0.006). Resistant hypertension was a risk factor for composite outcome [HR 1.857(C.I. 1.170-2.946, p = 0.009)].

CONCLUSION

In patients with cardiorenal multimorbidity there is a high proportion of RH that represents a risk factor for composite outcome but not for in-hospital mortality.

Does Renal Denervation a Reasonable Treatment Option in Hemodialysis-Dependent Patient with Resistant Hypertension? A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This narrative review aims to assess the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of resistant hypertension (RH) in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on dialysis, with a specific focus on the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on short-term and long-term blood pressure (BP) control. Additionally, we share our experience with the use of RDN in an amyloidotic patient undergoing hemodialysis with RH.

RECENT FINDINGS

High BP, an important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, is often observed in patients in ESKD, despite the administration of multiple antihypertensive medications. However, in clinical practice, it remains challenging to identify RH patients on dialysis treatment because of the absence of specific definition for RH in this context. Moreover, the use of invasive approaches, such as RDN, to treat RH is limited by the exclusion of patients with reduced renal function (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m3) in the clinical trials. Nevertheless, recent studies have reported encouraging results regarding the effectiveness of RDN in stage 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESKD patients on dialysis, with reductions in BP of nearly up to 10 mmhg. Although multiple underlying pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to RH, the overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system in ESKD patients on dialysis plays a crucial role. The diagnosis of RH requires both confirmation of adherence to antihypertensive therapy and the presence of uncontrolled BP values by ambulatory BP monitoring or home BP monitoring. Treatment involves a combination of nonpharmacological approaches (such as dry weight reduction, sodium restriction, dialysate sodium concentration reduction, and exercise) and pharmacological treatments. A promising approach for managing of RH is based on catheter-based RDN, through radiofrequency, ultrasound, or alcohol infusion, directly targeting on sympathetic overactivity.

Resistant hypertension: consensus document from the Korean society of hypertension

Although reports vary, the prevalence of true resistant hypertension and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) has been reported to be 10.3% and 14.7%, respectively. As there is a rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus, factors that are associated with resistant hypertension, the prevalence of resistant hypertension is expected to rise as well. Frequently, patients with aTRH have pseudoresistant hypertension [aTRH due to white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), drug underdosing, poor adherence, and inaccurate office blood pressure (BP) measurements]. As the prevalence of WUCH is high among patients with aTRH, the use of out-of-office BP measurements, both ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), is essential to exclude WUCH. Non-adherence is especially problematic, and methods to assess adherence remain limited and often not clinically feasible. Therefore, the use of HBPM and higher utilization of single-pill fixed-dose combination treatments should be emphasized to improve drug adherence. In addition, primary aldosteronism and symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea are quite common in patients with hypertension and more so in patients with resistant hypertension. Screening for these diseases is essential, as the treatment of these secondary causes may help control BP in patients who are otherwise difficult to treat. Finally, a proper drug regimen combined with lifestyle modifications is essential to control BP in these patients.

Clinical event reductions in high-risk patients after renal denervation projected from the global SYMPLICITY registry

AIMS

Renal denervation has been shown to lower blood pressure in sham-controlled trials and represents a device-based treatment option for hypertension. We sought to project clinical event reductions after radiofrequency renal denervation using a novel modelling approach.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Global SYMPLICITY Registry is a global, prospective all-comer registry to evaluate safety and efficacy after renal denervation. For this analysis, change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline was calculated from reported follow-up in the Global SYMPLICITY Registry. Relative risks for death and other cardiovascular events as well as numbers needed to treat for event avoidance were obtained for the respective blood pressure reductions based on previously reported meta-regression analyses for the full cohort and high-risk subgroups including type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, resistant hypertension, and high basal cardiovascular risk. Average baseline office systolic blood pressure and reduction estimates for the full cohort (N = 2651) were 166±25 and -14.8 ± 0.4 mmHg, respectively. Mean reductions in blood pressure ranged from -11.0--21.8 mmHg for the studied high-risk subgroups. Projected relative risks ranged from 0.57 for stroke in the resistant hypertension cohort to 0.92 for death in the diabetes cohort. Significant absolute reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events over 3 years compared with the projected control (8.6 ± 0.7% observed vs. 11.7 ± 0.9% for projected control; P < 0.01) were primarily due to reduced stroke incidence. The robustness of findings was confirmed in sensitivity and scenario analyses.

CONCLUSION

Model-based projections suggest radiofrequency renal denervation for patients with uncontrolled hypertension adds considerable clinical benefit across a spectrum of different cohort characteristics.

Perspectives on improving blood pressure control to reduce the clinical and economic burden of hypertension

The clinical and economic burden of hypertension is high and continues to increase globally. Uncontrolled hypertension has severe but avoidable long-term consequences, including cardiovascular diseases, which are among the most burdensome and most preventable conditions in Europe. Yet, despite clear guidelines on screening, diagnosis and management of hypertension, a large proportion of patients remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Low adherence and persistence are common, exacerbating the issue of poor blood pressure (BP) control. Although current guidelines provide clear direction, implementation is hampered by barriers at the patient-, physician- and healthcare system levels. Underestimation of the impact of uncontrolled hypertension and limited health literacy lead to low adherence and persistence among patients, treatment inertia among physicians and a lack of decisive healthcare system action. Many options to improve BP control are available or under investigation. Patients would benefit from targeted health education, improved BP measurement, individualized treatment or simplified treatment regimens through single-pill combinations. For physicians, increasing awareness of the burden of hypertension, as well as offering training on monitoring and optimal management and provision of the necessary time to collaboratively engage with patients would be useful. Healthcare systems should establish nationwide strategies for hypertension screening and management. Furthermore, there is an unmet need to implement more comprehensive BP measurements to optimize management. In conclusion, an integrative, patient-focused, multimodal multidisciplinary approach to the management of hypertension by clinicians, payers and policymakers, involving patients, is required to achieve long-term improvements in population health and cost-efficiency for healthcare systems.

Renal Denervation as a Complementary Treatment Option for Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension: A Situation Assessment

Uncontrolled arterial hypertension is a major global health issue. Catheter-based renal denervation has shown to lower blood pressure in sham-controlled trials and represents a device-based, complementary treatment option for hypertension. In this situation assessment, the authors, who are practicing experts in hypertension, nephrology, general practice and cardiology in the Republic of Ireland, discuss the current evidence base for the BP-lowering efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation with different modalities. Although important questions remain regarding the identification of responders, and long-term efficacy and safety of the intervention, renal denervation has the potential to provide much-needed help to address hypertension and its adverse consequences. The therapeutic approach needs to be multidisciplinary and personalised to take into account the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals in a shared decision-making process.

Anatomic Variations of Renal Arteries as an Important Factor in the Effectiveness of Renal Denervation in Resistant Hypertension

Hypertension remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite advances in drug-based treatment, many patients do not achieve target blood pressure. In recent years, there has been an increased interest in invasive hypertension treatment methods. Long-term effects and factors affecting renal denervation effectiveness are still under investigation. Some investigators found that the renal arteries' morphology is crucial in renal denervation effectiveness. Accessory renal arteries occur in 20-30% of the population and even more frequently in patients with resistant hypertension. Diversity in renal vascularization and innervation may complicate the renal denervation procedure and increase the number of people who will not benefit from treatment. Based on previous studies, it has been shown that the presence of accessory renal arteries, and in particular, the lack of their complete denervation, reduces the procedure's effectiveness. The following review presents the anatomical assessment of the renal arteries, emphasizing the importance of imaging tests. Examples of imaging and denervation methods to optimize the procedure are presented. The development of new-generation catheters and the advancement in knowledge of renal arteries anatomy may improve the effectiveness of treatment and reduce the number of patients who do not respond to treatment.

Established and Emerging Cancer Therapies and Cardiovascular System: Focus on Hypertension-Mechanisms and Mitigation

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are 2 of the leading causes of death worldwide. Although improvements in outcomes have been noted for both disease entities, the success of cancer therapies has come at the cost of at times very impactful adverse events such as cardiovascular events. Hypertension has been noted as both, a side effect as well as a risk factor for the cardiotoxicity of cancer therapies. Some of these dynamics are in keeping with the role of hypertension as a cardiovascular risk factor not only for heart failure, but also for the development of coronary and cerebrovascular disease, and kidney disease and its association with a higher morbidity and mortality overall. Other aspects such as the molecular mechanisms underlying the amplification of acute and long-term cardiotoxicity risk of anthracyclines and increase in blood pressure with various cancer therapeutics remain to be elucidated. In this review, we cover the latest clinical data regarding the risk of hypertension across a spectrum of novel anticancer therapies as well as the underlying known or postulated pathophysiological mechanisms. Furthermore, we review the acute and long-term implications for the amplification of the development of cardiotoxicity with drugs not commonly associated with hypertension such as anthracyclines. An outline of management strategies, including pharmacological and lifestyle interventions as well as models of care aimed to facilitate early detection and more timely management of hypertension in patients with cancer and survivors concludes this review, which overall aims to improve both cardiovascular and cancer-specific outcomes.

Novel Dual Endothelin Inhibitors in the Management of Resistant Hypertension

Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as the failure to achieve blood pressure control despite using triple combination therapy with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RAS-i), a calcium antagonist, and a diuretic. The endothelin (ET) system is implicated in the regulation of vascular tone, primarily through vasoconstriction, intervenes in cardiac contractility with inotropic effects, and contributes to water and sodium renal reabsorption. ET inhibitors, currently approved for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension, seem to be also useful for essential hypertension and RH as well. Studies into the development of new dual ET inhibitors, which inhibit both type A and B ET (ETA and ETB) receptors, present initial results of managing RH. Aprocitentan (ACT-132577) is a novel, orally active and well tolerated dual ET receptor antagonist, which has been examined in several experimental studies and clinical trials with promising results for RH control. The recent publication of the large PRECISION study in The Lancet journal provides further reassurance regarding the efficacy and safety of aprocitentan for RH, with the aim of overcoming unmet needs in the management of this difficult group of patients.

Renal Denervation: A Practical Guide for Health Professionals Managing Hypertension

Growing evidence demonstrates the suitability of renal denervation in a broad population of patients; however, questions remain over its suitability and practical implementation. Given the rapidity of emerging data, this has been a challenging field for potential adopters to navigate. The purpose of this article is twofold: to provide navigation through emerging clinical data and evolving guidance; and to provide physicians with practical, evidence-based advice for identifying eligible patients and providing appropriate management in the pre- and postintervention settings. Although many of these recommendations are based on existing published guidance documents, we reflect equally on our own experiences of using this technology.

Peregrine system infusion catheter for neurolytic renal denervation in hypertension: an overview of its safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Resistant hypertension (HTN), despite the tremendous advances in pharmacotherapy, is a major global problem. Transcatheter renal denervation (RDN) could be a pertinent strategy for resistant HTN and patients with poor pharmacotherapy adherence. Nonetheless, the adoption of energy-based RDN in clinical practice is slow and alternative approaches are needed.

AREAS COVERED

The review focuses on the assessment of the Peregrine System Infusion Catheters. The system is designed for chemically mediated transcatheter RDN by the infusion publications on the Peregrine system. The theoretical assumptions for chemically mediated RDN, design of the system, data from preclinical and clinical studies, and further perspectives are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Peregrine System Infusion Catheters are the only catheter on the market designed for chemically mediated RDN by the infusion of the neurolytic agent. Chemical neurolysis more efficiently destroys nerves around the renal artery in comparison to energy-based catheters, due to deeper tissue penetration and circumferential distribution resulting in a wider range of effective nerve injury. Chemically mediated RDN by the infusion of the neurolytic agent (alcohol) has an excellent safety profile as confirmed in initial clinical trials which also suggested high efficacy. Currently, there is an ongoing phase III sham-control study. Other possible applications of this technology include clinical settings like heart failure or atrial fibrillation.

2022 Renal denervation therapy for the treatment of hypertension: a statement from the Thai Hypertension Society

Hypertension remains a significant risk factor for major cardiovascular events worldwide. Poor adherence to treatment is extremely common in clinical practice, leading to uncontrolled hypertension. However, some patients with resistant hypertension still have uncontrolled blood pressure despite good medical compliance. A specific group of patients also develop adverse reactions to many blood pressure-lowering medications. These scenarios indicate that innovative strategies to lower blood pressure in challenging cases of hypertension are needed. The blood pressure-lowering efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation therapy to decrease sympathetic tone has been confirmed in many publications in recent years. Apart from both the invasiveness and the expensiveness of this technology, appropriate case selection to undergo this procedure is still developing. The utilization of renal denervation therapy for hypertension treatment in Thailand has lasted for 10 years with a good response in most cases. Currently, only certain interventionists at a few medical schools in Thailand can perform this procedure. However, more physicians are now interested in applying this technology to their patients. The Thai Hypertension Society Committee has reviewed updated information to provide principles for the appropriate utilization of renal denervation therapy. The blood pressure-lowering mechanism, efficacy, suitable patient selection, pre- and postprocedural assessment and procedural safety of renal denervation are included in this statement.

Relationship between accessory renal arteries and resistant hypertension: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Resistant hypertension (RHT) is a major health care concern affecting 20 to 30% of hypertensive patients and increasing cardiovascular risk. Recent renal denervation trials have suggested a high prevalence of accessory renal arteries (ARA) in RHT. Our objective was to compare the prevalence of ARA in RHT vs. non-resistant hypertension (NRHT).

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with essential hypertension who benefited from an abdominal CT-scan or MRI during their initial workup were retrospectively recruited in 6 French ESH (European Society of Hypertension) centers. At the end of a follow-up period of at least 6 months, patients were classified between RHT or NRHT. RHT was defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite the optimal doses of three antihypertensive agents of which one is a diuretic or similar, or controlled by ≥ 4 medications. Blinded independent central review of all radiologic renal artery charts was performed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were: age 50±15 years, 62% males, BP 145±22/87±13mmHg. Fifty-three (62%) patients had RHT and 25 (29%) had at least one ARA. Prevalence of ARA was comparable between RHT (25%) and NRHT patients (33%, P=0.62), but there were more ARA per patient in NRHT (2±0.9) vs. RHT (1.3±0.5, P=0.05), and renin levels were higher in ARA group (51.6±41.7 mUI/L vs. 20.4±25.4 mUI/L, P=0.001). ARA were similar in diameter or length between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective series of 86 essential hypertension patients, we found no difference in the prevalence of ARA in RHT and NRHT. More comprehensive studies are needed to answer this question.

New perspectives for hypertension management: progress in methodological and technological developments

Hypertension is the most common and preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), accounting for 20% of deaths worldwide. However, 2/3 of people with hypertension are undiagnosed, untreated, or under treated. A multi-pronged approach is needed to improve hypertension management. Elevated blood pressure (BP) in childhood is a predictor of hypertension and CVD in adulthood; therefore, screening and education programmes should start early and continue throughout the lifespan. Home BP monitoring can be used to engage patients and improve BP control rates. Progress in imaging technology allows for the detection of preclinical disease, which may help identify patients who are at greatest risk of CV events. There is a need to optimize the use of current BP control strategies including lifestyle modifications, antihypertensive agents, and devices. Reducing the complexity of pharmacological therapy using single-pill combinations can improve patient adherence and BP control and may reduce physician inertia. Other strategies that can improve patient adherence include education and reassurance to address misconceptions, engaging patients in management decisions, and using digital tools. Strategies to improve physician therapeutic inertia, such as reminders, education, physician-peer visits, and task-sharing may improve BP control rates. Digital health technologies, such as telemonitoring, wearables, and other mobile health platforms, are becoming frequently adopted tools in hypertension management, particularly those that have undergone regulatory approval. Finally, to fight the consequences of hypertension on a global scale, healthcare system approaches to cardiovascular risk factor management are needed. Government policies should promote routine BP screening, salt-, sugar-, and alcohol reduction programmes, encourage physical activity, and target obesity control.

Patient Preferences for Pharmaceutical and Device-Based Treatments for Uncontrolled Hypertension: Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND

Discrete choice experiment is a survey method used to understand how individuals make decisions and to quantify the relative importance of features. Using discrete choice experiment methods, we quantified patient benefit-risk preferences for hypertension treatments, including pharmaceutical and interventional treatments, like renal denervation.

METHODS

Respondents from the United States with physician-confirmed uncontrolled hypertension selected between treatments involving a procedure or pills, using a structured survey. Treatment features included interventional, noninterventional, or no hypertension treatment; number of daily blood pressure (BP) pills; expected reduction in office systolic BP; duration of effect; and risks of drug side effects, access site pain, or vascular injury. The results of a random-parameters logit model were used to estimate the importance of each treatment attribute.

RESULTS

Among 400 patients completing the survey between 2020 and 2021, demographics included: 52% women, mean age 59.2±13.0 years, systolic BP 155.1±12.3 mm Hg, and 1.8±0.9 prescribed antihypertensive medications. Reduction in office systolic BP was the most important treatment attribute. The remaining attributes, in decreasing order, were duration of effect, whether treatment was interventional, number of daily pills, risk of vascular injury, and risk of drug side effects. Risk of access site pain did not influence choice. In general, respondents preferred noninterventional over interventional treatments, yet only a 2.3 mm Hg reduction in office systolic BP was required to offset this preference. Small reductions in office systolic BP would offset risks of vascular injury or drug side effects. At least a 20% risk of vascular injury or drug side effects would be tolerated in exchange for improved BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction in systolic BP was identified as the most important driver of patient treatment preference, while treatment-related risks had less influence. The results indicate that respondents would accept interventional treatments in exchange for modest reductions in systolic BP compared with those observed in renal denervation trials.

Novel Invasive Methods as the Third Pillar for the Treatment of Essential Uncontrolled Hypertension

Pharmacologic therapies remain the treatment of choice for patients with essential hypertension, as endorsed by international guidelines. However, several cases warrant additional modalities, such as invasive antihypertensive therapeutics. The major target of these interventions is the modulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which is a common pathophysiologic mechanism in essential hypertension. In this narrative review, we elaborate on the role of invasive antihypertensive treatments with a focus on renal denervation, stressing their potential as well as the drawbacks that prevent their widespread implementation in everyday clinical practice. In the field of renal denervation, several trials have shown significant and sustained reductions in the level of office and ambulatory blood pressure, regardless of the type of energy that was used (radiofrequency or ultrasound). Critically, renal denervation is considered a safe intervention, as evidenced by follow-up data from large clinical trials. Baroreflex activation therapy may result in enhanced parasympathetic nervous system activation, thus lowering blood pressure levels. Along the same lines, carotid body ablation could also produce a significant antihypertensive effect, which has not been tested in appropriately designed randomized trials. Moreover, cardiac neuromodulation therapy could prove efficacious by altering the duration of the atrioventricular interval in order to regulate the preload of the left ventricle and, therefore, lower blood pressure.

Consensus and inconsistency between different consensus documents on renal denervation worldwide: the way forward

ABSTRACT

Given the unsatisfactory hypertension control rates and high rates of non-adherence to antihypertensive medications worldwide, device therapy which can safely provide durable blood pressure-lowering effects can fulfill the unmet need. A series of second-generation randomized sham-controlled renal denervation (RDN) trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of RDN in a wide range of hypertensive patients. The four representative consensus documents on RDN (from the Chinese Taiwan Hypertension Society and Taiwan Society of Cardiology [THS/TSOC 2019], Asia Renal Denervation Consortium 2019, European Society of Hypertension [ESH 2021], and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Intervention and National Kidney Foundation [SCAI/NKF 2021]) consistently recommend RDN as an alternative or complementary treatment strategy for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. In addition, both documents from Asia further recommend that RDN can be considered as an initial treatment strategy for drug-naïve hypertensive patients. There is still inconsistency regarding whether ambulatory blood pressure monitoring should be used routinely both before and after RDN, and whether patients with a secondary cause of hypertension could be treated with RDN if their blood pressure remains uncontrolled after definitive treatment (treatment-resistant secondary hypertension). The THS/TSOC consensus provides acronyms to summarize key aspects of patient selection (RDNi2) and pre-RDN assessments (RAS). The ESH and SCAI/NKF documents recommend establishing structured pathways for clinical practice and issues regarding reimbursement. All documents identify knowledge gaps in RDN, from identifying predictors of super-responders to demonstrating effects on cardiovascular events. These gaps should be urgently filled to facilitate the wider application of this device therapy for patients with hypertension.

Quality of life following renal sympathetic denervation in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients: a two-year follow-up study

Objective. Hypertension is a significant health burden. In the last 10 years, renal sympathetic denervation has been tested as a potential treatment option for a select group of patients with treatment-resistant hypertension. The aim of this study was to broadly assess the quality of life in patients undergoing renal sympathetic denervation with two years' follow-up. Materials and methods. Patients with treatment-resistant hypertension being treated by hypertension specialists were eligible for inclusion in this study. Bilateral renal sympathetic denervation was performed with the Symplicity Catheter System. Quality of life was measured using standardised questionnaires (Short Form 36, 15 D and a single-item question) and an open question before denervation, after six months and after two years. Results. A total of 23 patients were included. The typical participant was male, 53 years, had a mean office blood pressure of 162/108 mmHg, body mass index of 32 kg/m², and was prescribed 4.8 blood pressure lowering drug classes. At baseline, both physical and mental aspects of quality of life were affected negatively by the treatment-resistant hypertension. Over time, there were modest improvements in quality of life. The largest improvements were seen at six months. Simultaneously, the mean number of blood pressure lowering drug classes was reduced to 4.2. Conclusion. Following renal sympathetic denervation treatment, some aspects of health related quality of life showed an improved trend during follow-up. The observed improvement may reflect the impact of a reduced number of blood pressure lowering drug classes. Clinical Trial Number registered: NCT01630928.