The case for standalone micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: rethinking the role of surgery in the glaucoma treatment paradigm

Legislative Changes on Opioid Prescriptions for Ocular Procedures in a United States Cohort

This ecological study examines the prevalence of postoperative opioid prescriptions among ophthalmic surgical patients during the implementation of four opioid policy interventions in Ohio. Changes in ophthalmic prescribing among 53 health care systems throughout the United States are compared to a population from the MetroHealth System in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Opioid prescription prevalence spiked among all populations amid Ohio's "pill mill" and mandatory registration policies and then consistently decreased during the state's mandatory reporting and number-of-day restrictions. Black, Hispanic, and male subgroups across the country were more likely to receive opioids relative to other subgroups during most policy periods, but their rates were likely driven by trauma-related procedures. Prescribing fluctuations among ophthalmologists in the MetroHealth System generally matched national trends and did not correlate with prescribing trends among other specialties in Ohio. Consistent with previous research, opioid prescribing in ophthalmology remains low compared to other specialties throughout the country. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2025;56:XX-XX.].

An Emerging Multi-mechanism and Multi-modal Approach in Interventional Glaucoma Therapy

The glaucoma treatment paradigm is in evolution. The topical medications-first approach is limited by significant barriers such as high rates of nonadherence and side effects including ocular surface disease. The era of interventional glaucoma has seen the development of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT), procedural pharmaceuticals, and minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS). New and emerging data support the use of these interventional treatment modalities early in the course of glaucoma rather than reserving them for advanced or treatment-recalcitrant cases. The various treatments available represent multiple mechanisms (e.g., trabecular outflow, uveoscleral outflow, aqueous suppression) and modalities (medications, laser, incisional surgery) by which intraocular pressure (IOP) is reduced. Many patients require more than one treatment to achieve adequate IOP reduction and glaucoma control. Comprehensive IOP control-reduction of both mean IOP and IOP fluctuation-can best be achieved by targeting multiple mechanisms of IOP reduction and taking advantage of the attributes of multiple treatment modalities.

Real-world outcomes and predictors of failure of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in a large glaucoma cohort: a multicenter study

This retrospective, comparative, multicenter study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes and predictors of failure of Gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) at 12 months in glaucoma patients. Predictors of failure of absolute success in bilateral cases (422 eyes of 308 patients) included pre-operative intraocular pressure (IOP; IRR = 1.02; p = 0.01), and pre-operative mean deviation (IRR = 0.98; p = 0.007). The significant predictors of failure of relative success included binocularity (IRR = 4.05; p = 0.001) and pre-operative IOP (IRR = 1.04; p = 0.022). Only one eye per patient (308 eyes) was included in the second analysis. IOP reduced from 21.84 ± 7.96 mmHg to 11.97 ± 2.89 mmHg at 12 months; the number of hypotensive eye drop medications decreased from 3.07 ± 1.04 to 1.06 ± 1.08 (p < 0.001 for both). The pre-operative IOP was a predictive factor for failure of absolute (IRR = 1.02; p = 0.026) and relative successes (IRR = 1.05; p = 0.014). The preoperative number of hypotensive medications only affected absolute success (IRR = 1.25; p = 0.004). The Kaplan-Meier graph revealed relative and absolute success in 88.9% and 43.9% of cases, respectively. In conclusion, GATT is a safe and effective treatment option for diverse forms of open-angle glaucoma with varying severity. Pre-operative number of medications and IOP, race, and the outcomes of the contralateral eye (if applicable) were identified as predictors of failure of the procedure.

Meta-Analysis of MINIject vs. Two iStents as Standalone Treatment for Glaucoma with 24 Months of Follow-Up

Background: This study compares the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of standalone MINIject (iSTAR Medical, Belgium) suprachoroidal implantation and two iStent (Glaukos, CA, USA) trabecular bypass implantation using a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Systematic review of standalone implantation of MINIject or iStent inject with at least 24 months of follow up. The mean and standard deviation of IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications at baseline and at 24 months were extracted. Weighted estimates of the outcome variables were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity in the outcome measures among the studies was quantified using I². Results: Seven studies (three studies for MINIject and four for iStent) comprising 280 eyes were included. At 24 months, there was a greater reduction in IOP from baseline in the MINIject vs. two iStent cohorts (-9.57 vs. -4.92 mmHg, p = 0.03). The change from baseline in mean medication use was -1.00 with MINIject and -0.56 medications with iStent (p = 0.26). The mean percentage IOP reduction at 24 months ranged from 36.3-42.2% with MINIject compared to 5.2-40.7% with iStent, with greater variability in mean change from baseline in IOP observed in the iStent group (I2 = 96.5% vs. 0%). The most frequent adverse events for MINIject were anterior chamber inflammation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) loss, hyphema, and conjunctival hemorrhage, and for iStent, these were device obstruction, BCVA loss, IOP spike, and cataract progression. Conclusions: While both MINIject and iStent inject devices resulted in significant reductions in IOP and IOP medication use, standalone MINIject may provide a greater and more consistent reduction in IOP.

Bio-Interventional Cyclodialysis and Allograft Scleral Reinforcement for Uveoscleral Outflow Enhancement in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients: One-Year Clinical Outcomes

Background

To evaluate the one-year safety and effectiveness of bio-interventional cyclodialysis and scleral reinforcement in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Methods

An ab-interno approach was used to create a sectoral cyclodialysis in OAG patients who were prospectively followed in a consecutive case series. Subsequent visco-cycloplasty with scleral reinforcement using homologous minimally modified allograft scaffold was completed to maintain patency of the cyclodialysis reservoir and increase uveoscleral outflow. Outcomes were mean medicated IOP and mean number of IOP-lowering medications. Safety outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) changes.

Results

Successful cyclodialysis and allograft bio-scaffold reinforcement was achieved in 117 eyes. There was minimal intraoperatie bleeding and few post-operative adverse events. At baseline, mean BCVA was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.42‒0.54; 20/40 Snellen) and mean ± SD medicated IOP was 20.2 ± 6.0 mmHg on 1.4 ± 1.3 IOP-lowering medications. At 12 months, there was a 27.1% reduction from baseline mean medicated IOP. In eyes with medicated baseline IOP > 21 mmHg (n = 45), there was a 39.7% paired IOP reduction at 12 months with a concurrent reduction in the mean number of IOP lowering medications to 0.8 ± 0.9 which were statistically significant (p < 0.01). For all eyes, 81.9% achieved a medicated IOP ≤ 18 mmHg with no increase in medications at 12 months. To achieve target IOP control, secondary glaucoma surgery was performed in 3.2% of the cases.

Conclusion

IOP lowering through uveoscleral outflow enhancement can be achieved by means of a bio-interventional cyclodialysis procedure with allograft scleral reinforcement.

Effectiveness and biocompatibility of a novel Schlemm's canal microstent for glaucoma management

To evaluate the effectiveness and biocompatibility of Wistend, a novel Schlemm's canal (SC) microstent made of Nitinol designed to improve aqueous humor outflow. New Zealand white (NZW) rabbits were divided into blank, sham-operated and Wistend groups. ICare® Tonovet Plus®, swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), slit lamp biomicroscopy, retinal camera and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used for preoperative and postoperative observations. Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) tissue staining was adopted for biocompatibility. A significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) between the Wistend group and the control groups was observed during the six-month follow-up. SS-OCT identified arc line internal reflections within the SC in the anterior chamber angle. Conjunctival congestion and edema gradually diminished in the early stages. No corneal vascularization, no anterior chamber inflammatory response and no significant tissue reactions were noted in any groups. SEM showed the Wistend's windows and orifices remained clear, encircled by minimal incidental ocular tissue and free from blockage. Histopathological examination revealed no discernible differences between the Wistend-implanted and sham-operated eyes. These in vivo studies demonstrate the effectiveness and biocompatibility of the microstent. Our findings suggest a promising potential for Wistend in significantly reducing IOP and effectively facilitating the outflow of aqueous humor.

Ab Interno Canaloplasty and Trabeculotomy Outcomes for Mild, Moderate, and Advanced Open-Angle Glaucoma: A ROMEO Analysis

Purpose

To determine if there was an association between severity of glaucoma and intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication (med) outcomes for patients in the ROMEO (Retrospective, Observational, Multicenter Evaluation of OMNI) study.

Setting

Eleven ophthalmology practices in 8 US states.

Design

Post-hoc analysis of all eyes enrolled and treated with ab interno canaloplasty and trabeculotomy in the retrospective, multicenter ROMEO study.

Methods

Eyes were grouped according to visual field mean deviation (MD): mild (MD better than -6 dB), moderate (MD between -6 and -12 dB), advanced (-12 dB or worse). IOP and med outcomes at 12 months were compared across groups. Least squares regression was used to assess the relationship of MD with month 12 IOP. Outcomes for 1st and last MD deciles were compared as a sensitivity analysis.

Results

One hundred and twenty-seven eyes were available for analysis including 79 mild, 42 moderate, 6 advanced. Most eyes had a reduction in IOP at Month 12 (70%) with most at 18 mmHg or less. Percentage IOP reduction was similar across the groups (mild 16.9%, moderate 18.6%, advanced 18.0%) with mean month 12 IOP between 14 and 16 mmHg. Medications were also reduced in all three groups; -0.8 (mild, P < 0.001), -0.55 (moderate, P < 0.05), and -1.0 (advanced, P = 0.139, ns). Regression analysis revealed no relationship between month 12 IOP and MD. Med reductions were observed for all groups with a reduction of 1 or more medications seen in (%, 95% CI) 69%, 59-79 (mild), 50%, 35-65 (moderate), and 60%, 21-99 (advanced). Secondary interventions tended to have greater incidence with worse MD likely reflecting lower desired IOP targets.

Conclusion

Analysis of data from the ROMEO study suggests that similar meaningful IOP and med reductions can be expected across the range of disease severity studied.

Alternatives to Topical Glaucoma Medication for Glaucoma Management

Topical glaucoma medications have favorable safety and efficacy, but their use is limited by factors such as side effects, nonadherence, costs, ocular surface disease, intraocular pressure fluctuations, diminished quality of life, and the inherent difficulty of penetrating the corneal surface. Although traditionally these limitations have been accepted as an inevitable part of glaucoma treatment, a rapidly-evolving arena of minimally invasive surgical and laser interventions has initiated the beginnings of a reevaluation of the glaucoma treatment paradigm. This reevaluation encompasses an overall shift away from the reactive, topical-medication-first default and a shift toward earlier intervention with laser or surgical therapies such as selective laser trabeculoplasty, sustained-release drug delivery, and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery. Aside from favorable safety, these interventions may have clinically important attributes such as consistent IOP control, cost-effectiveness, independence from patient adherence, prevention of disease progression, and improved quality of life.

Challenging the "Topical Medications-First" Approach to Glaucoma: A Treatment Paradigm in Evolution

Topical glaucoma medications are effective and safe, but they have numerous well-documented limitations that diminish their long-term utility and sustainability. These limitations can include high rates of nonadherence (with associated glaucoma progression), concerning side effects, inconsistent circadian intraocular pressure (IOP) control, complex dosing regimens, difficulty with self-administration, costs, and decreased quality of life. Despite these limitations, topical medications traditionally have been first-line in the glaucoma treatment algorithm, as no other minimally invasive treatment alternatives existed. In recent years, however, novel interventional therapies-including sustained-release drug-delivery platforms, selective laser trabeculoplasty, and micro-invasive glaucoma surgery procedures-have made it possible to intervene earlier without relying on topical medications. As a result, the topical medication-first treatment approach is being reevaluated in an overall shift toward earlier more proactive interventions.

Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Review of the Literature

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has emerged as a novel approach in the glaucoma treatment spectrum, offering a range of diverse procedures and devices aimed at reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). MIGS can be broadly classified into several categories: those that enhance trabecular outflow (Trabectome, iStent, Hydrus Microstent, Kahook Dual Blade, high frequency deep sclerotomy, and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy), those that augment suprachoroidal outflow (CyPass Microstent and iStent Supra), those that target Schlemm's canal (TRAB360 and the OMNI Surgical System, Streamline, and Ab Interno Canaloplasty), and conjunctival bleb-forming procedures (EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device, Xen Gel Stent and PreserFlo MicroShunt). MIGS is considered to have a shorter surgical time and fewer severe complications when compared to traditional glaucoma surgeries such as trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device implantation (Ahmed, Baerveldt, and Molteno valves). This literature review comprehensively examines the distinct MIGS devices and procedures, their underlying mechanisms, and clinical outcomes, emphasizing the importance of evaluating the efficacy and complications of each approach individually. As the field of MIGS continues to evolve, it is crucial to prioritize high-quality, long-term studies to better understand the safety and effectiveness of these innovative interventions in glaucoma management.

[Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery-Comparison of angle based procedures]

Surgical procedures are playing an increasing role in the care of patients with glaucoma. Within the last decade, new surgical procedures have been established, which are summarized under the term minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). A wide variety of different procedures are aimed at the structures in the angle of the anterior chamber, such as the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm's canal, to improve the physiological outflow or to improve the alternative uveoscleral outflow. The implementation of the treatment goal differs in the individual procedures, as does the maximum pressure reduction that can be achieved. Compared to trabeculectomy with the use of cytostatic agents, the achievable pressure reduction is usually significantly lower. In contrast, the significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative complication rates are emphasized as an advantage of these procedures. With increasing clinical experience and the growth of sufficient data on these new surgical procedures, a well-founded classification in the treatment algorithm of glaucoma surgery becomes easier; nevertheless, due to the small differences with respect to efficacy and safety profile, the final decision for an individual procedure often remains dependent on the surgeon's personal preferences.