Neuropeptide Y inhibits the trigeminovascular pathway through NPY Y1 receptor: implications for migraine

Neuropeptide Y and Pain: Insights from Brain Research

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a highly conserved neuropeptide with widespread distribution in the central nervous system and diverse physiological functions. While extensively studied for its inhibitory effects on pain at the spinal cord level, its role in pain modulation within the brain remains less clear. This review aims to summarize the complex landscape of supraspinal NPY signaling in pain processing. We discuss the expression and function of NPY receptors in key pain-related brain regions, including the parabrachial nucleus, periaqueductal gray, amygdala, and nucleus accumbens. Additionally, we highlight the potent efficacy of NPY in attenuating pain sensitivity and nociceptive processing throughout the central nervous system. NPY-based therapeutic interventions targeting the central nervous system represent a promising avenue for novel analgesic strategies and pain-associated comorbidities.

Neuropeptide Y Y2 receptors in acute and chronic pain and itch

Pain and itch are regulated by a diverse array of neuropeptides and their receptors in superficial laminae of the spinal cord dorsal horn (DH). Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is normally expressed on DH neurons but not sensory neurons. By contrast, the Npy2r receptor (Y2) is expressed on the central and peripheral terminals of sensory neurons but not on DH neurons. Neurophysiological slice recordings indicate that Y2-selective agonists inhibits spinal neurotransmitter release from sensory neurons. However, behavioral pharmacology studies indicate that Y2 agonists exert minimal changes in nociception, even after injury. Additional discrepancies in the behavioral actions of the Y2-antagonist BIIE0246 - reports of either pronociception or antinociception - have now been resolved. In the normal state, spinally-directed (intrathecal) administration of BIIE0246 elicits ongoing nociception, hypersensitivity to sensory stimulation, and aversion. Conversely, in the setting of nerve injury and inflammation, intrathecal BIIE024 reduced not only mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity, but also a measure of the affective dimension of pain (conditioned place preference). When administered in chronic pain models of latent sensitization, BIIE0246 produced a profound reinstatement of pain-like behaviors. We propose that tissue or nerve injury induces a G protein switch in the action of NPY-Y2 signaling from antinociception in the naïve state to the inhibition of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia in the injured state, and then a switch back to antinociception to keep LS in a state of remission. This model clarifies the pharmacotherapeutic potential of Y2 research, pointing to the development of a new non-opioid pharmacotherapy for chronic pain using Y2 antagonists in patients who do not develop LS.

The prodrome of migraine: mechanistic insights and emerging therapeutic strategies

Migraine is a common clinical chronic neurovascular disease characterized by recurrent, mostly unilateral, moderate or severe, pulsatile headache. It can be divided into four clinical stages: premonitory (prodrome), aura, headache and postdrome. The early warning value of the prodrome in migraine has been largely verified in various studies. In fact, the prodrome of migraine has received increasing attention as it can serve as an ideal therapeutic window for early intervention and effective treatment of migraine. In recent years, the pathophysiological and molecular biological mechanisms in the prodromal stage of migraine have been extensively studied, and great progress has been made in understanding the disease. This review paper aims to provide an overview of recent studies mainly focused on the prodrome of migraine, discuss the biological mechanisms underlying the clinical profile, and reveal novel therapeutic strategies for preventing or blocking migraine onset during its prodrome.

Intervening in the Premonitory Phase to Prevent Migraine: Prospects for Pharmacotherapy

Migraine is a common brain condition characterised by disabling attacks of headache with sensory sensitivities. Despite increasing understanding of migraine neurobiology and the impacts of this on therapeutic developments, there remains a need for treatment options for patients underserved by currently available therapies. The first specific drugs developed to treat migraine acutely, the serotonin-5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT1B/1D] receptor agonists (triptans), seem to require headache onset in order to have an effect, while early treatment during mild pain before headache escalation improves short-term and long-term outcomes. Some patients find treating in the early window once headache has started but not escalated difficult, and migraine can arise from sleep or in the early hours of the morning, making prompt treatment after pain onset challenging. Triptans may be deemed unsuitable for use in patients with vascular disease and in those of older age and may not be effective in a proportion of patients. Headache is also increasingly recognised as being just one of the many facets of the migraine attack, and for some patients it is not the most disabling symptom. In many patients, painless symptoms can start prior to headache onset and can reliably warn of impending headache. There is, therefore, a need to identify therapeutic targets and agents that may be used as early as possible in the course of the attack, to prevent headache onset before it starts, and to reduce both headache and non-headache related attack burden. Early small studies using domperidone, naratriptan and dihydroergotamine have suggested that this approach could be useful; these studies were methodologically less rigorous than modern day treatment studies, of small sample size, and have not since been replicated. The emergence of novel targeted migraine treatments more recently, specifically calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists (gepants), has reignited interest in this strategy, with encouraging results. This review summarises historical and emerging data in this area, supporting use of the premonitory phase as an opportunity to intervene as early as possible in migraine to prevent attack-related morbidity.

Cross talk about the role of Neuropeptide Y in CNS disorders and diseases

A peptide composed of a 36 amino acid called Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is employed in a variety of physiological processes to manage and treat conditions affecting the endocrine, circulatory, respiratory, digestive, and neurological systems. NPY naturally binds to G-protein coupled receptors, activating the Y-receptors (Y1-Y5 and y6). The findings on numerous therapeutic applications of NPY for CNS disease are presented in this review by the authors. New targets for treating diseases will be revealed by medication combinations that target NPY and its receptors. This review is mainly focused on disorders such as anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, Machado Joseph disease, multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia, depression, migraine, alcohol use disorder, and substance use disorder. The findings from the preclinical studies and clinical studies covered in this article may help create efficient therapeutic plans to treat neurological conditions on the one hand and psychiatric disorders on the other. They may also open the door to the creation of novel NPY receptor ligands as medications to treat these conditions.

Genetic Mechanisms of Migraine: Insights from Monogenic Migraine Mutations

Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder burdening patients globally. Through the increasing development of preclinical and clinical experimental migraine models, advancing appreciation of the extended clinical phenotype, and functional neuroimaging studies, we can further our understanding of the neurobiological basis of this highly disabling condition. Despite increasing understanding of the molecular and chemical architecture of migraine mechanisms, many areas require further investigation. Research over the last three decades has suggested that migraine has a strong genetic basis, based on the positive family history in most patients, and this has steered exploration into possibly implicated genes. In recent times, human genome-wide association studies and rodent genetic migraine models have facilitated our understanding, but most migraine seems polygenic, with the monogenic migraine mutations being considerably rarer, so further large-scale studies are required to elucidate fully the genetic underpinnings of migraine and the translation of these to clinical practice. The monogenic migraine mutations cause severe aura phenotypes, amongst other symptoms, and offer valuable insights into the biology of aura and the relationship between migraine and other conditions, such as vascular disease and sleep disorders. This review will provide an outlook of what is known about some monogenic migraine mutations, including familial hemiplegic migraine, familial advanced sleep-phase syndrome, and cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy.

Neuroimaging in the pre-ictal or premonitory phase of migraine: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

The premonitory phase, or prodrome, of migraine, provides valuable opportunities to study attack initiation and for treating the attack before headache starts. Much that has been learned about this phase in recent times has come from the outcomes of functional imaging studies. This review will summarise these studies to date and use their results to provide some feasible insights into migraine neurobiology.

MAIN BODY

The ability to scan repeatedly a patient without radiation and with non-invasive imaging modalities, as well as the recognition that human experimental migraine provocation compounds, such as nitroglycerin (NTG) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP), can trigger typical premonitory symptoms (PS) and migraine-like headache in patients with migraine, have allowed feasible and reproducible imaging of the premonitory phase using NTG. Some studies have used serial scanning of patients with migraine to image the migraine cycle, including the 'pre-ictal' phase, defined by timing to headache onset rather than symptom phenotype. Direct observation and functional neuroimaging of triggered PS have also revealed compatible neural substrates for PS in the absence of headache. Various imaging methods including resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI), arterial spin labelling (ASL), positron emission tomography (PET) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) have been used. The results of imaging the spontaneous and triggered premonitory phase have been largely consistent and support a theory of central migraine attack initiation involving brain areas such as the hypothalamus, midbrain and limbic system. Early dysfunctional pain, sensory, limbic and homeostatic processing via monoaminergic and peptidergic neurotransmission likely manifests in the heterogeneous PS phenotype.

CONCLUSION

Advances in human migraine research, including the use of functional imaging techniques lacking radiation or radio-isotope exposure, have led to an exciting opportunity to study the premonitory phase using repeated measures imaging designs. These studies have provided novel insights into attack initiation, migraine neurochemistry and therapeutic targets. Emerging migraine-specific therapies, such as those targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), are showing promise acutely when taken during premonitory phase to reduce symptoms and prevent subsequent headache. Therapeutic research in this area using PS for headache onset prediction and early treatment is likely to grow in the future.

Molecular Mechanisms of Migraine: Nitric Oxide Synthase and Neuropeptides

Migraine is a common condition with disabling attacks that burdens people in the prime of their working lives. Despite years of research into migraine pathophysiology and therapeutics, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms at play in this complex neurovascular condition. Additionally, there remains a relative paucity of specific and targeted therapies available. Many sufferers remain underserved by currently available broad action preventive strategies, which are also complicated by poor tolerance and adverse effects. The development of preclinical migraine models in the laboratory, and the advances in human experimental migraine provocation, have led to the identification of key molecules likely involved in the molecular circuity of migraine, and have provided novel therapeutic targets. Importantly, the identification that vasoconstriction is neither necessary nor required for headache abortion has changed the landscape of migraine treatment and has broadened the therapy targets for patients with vascular risk factors or vascular disease. These targets include nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and several neuropeptides that are involved in migraine. The ability of NO donors and infusion of some of these peptides into humans to trigger typical migraine-like attacks has supported the development of targeted therapies against these molecules. Some of these, such as those targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), have already reached clinical practice and are displaying a positive outcome in migraineurs for the better by offering targeted efficacy without significant adverse effects. Others, such as those targeting pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP), are showing promise and are likely to enter phase 3 clinical trials in the near future. Understanding these nitrergic and peptidergic mechanisms in migraine and their interactions is likely to lead to further therapeutic strategies for migraine in the future.

Neuropeptide Y in the medial habenula alleviates migraine-like behaviors through the Y1 receptor

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a highly disabling health burden with multiple symptoms; however, it remains undertreated because of an inadequate understanding of its neural mechanisms. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been demonstrated to be involved in the modulation of pain and emotion, and may play a role in migraine pathophysiology. Changes in NPY levels have been found in patients with migraine, but whether and how these changes contribute to migraine is unknown. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the role of NPY in migraine-like phenotypes.

METHODS

Here, we used intraperitoneal injection of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, 10 mg/kg) as a migraine mouse model, which was verified by light-aversive test, von Frey test, and elevated plus maze test. We then performed whole-brain imaging with NPY-GFP mice to explore the critical regions where NPY was changed by GTN treatment. Next, we microinjected NPY into the medial habenula (MHb), and further infused Y1 or Y2 receptor agonists into the MHb, respectively, to detect the effects of NPY in GTN-induced migraine-like behaviors.

RESULTS

GTN effectively triggered allodynia, photophobia, and anxiety-like behaviors in mice. After that, we found a decreased level of GFP⁺ cells in the MHb of GTN-treated mice. Microinjection of NPY attenuated GTN-induced allodynia and anxiety without affecting photophobia. Furthermore, we found that activation of Y1-but not Y2-receptors attenuated GTN-induced allodynia and anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, our data support that the NPY signaling in the MHb produces analgesic and anxiolytic effects through the Y1 receptor. These findings may provide new insights into novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of migraine.

The premonitory phase of migraine is due to hypothalamic dysfunction: revisiting the evidence

OBJECTIVE

To critically appraise the evidence for and against premonitory symptoms in migraine being due to hypothalamic dysfunction.

DISCUSSION

Some premonitory symptoms (e.g. fatigue, mood changes, yawning, and food craving) are associated with the physiologic effects of neurotransmitters such as orexins, neuropeptide Y, and dopamine; all of which are expressed in hypothalamic neurons. In rodents, electrophysiologic recordings have shown that these neurotransmitters modulate nociceptive transmission at the level of second-order neurons in the trigeminocervical complex (TCC). Additional insights have been gained from neuroimaging studies that report hypothalamic activation during the premonitory phase of migraine. However, the available evidence is limited by methodologic issues, inconsistent reporting, and a lack of adherence to ICHD definitions of premonitory symptoms (or prodromes) in human experimental studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The current trend to accept that premonitory symptoms are due to hypothalamic dysfunction might be premature. More rigorously designed studies are needed to ascertain whether the neurobiologic basis of premonitory symptoms is due to hypothalamic dysfunction or rather reflects modulatory input to the trigeminovascular system from several cortical and subcortical areas. On a final note, the available epidemiologic data raises questions as to whether the existence of premonitory symptoms and even more so a distinct premonitory phase is a true migraine phenomenon. Video recording of the debate held at the 1st International Conference on Advances in Migraine Sciences (ICAMS 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark) is available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4Y2x0Hr4Q8 .

Trigeminal ganglion itself can be a viable target to manage trigeminal neuralgia

Excruciating trigeminal neuralgia (TN) management is very difficult and severely affects the patient's quality of life. Earlier studies have shown that the trigeminal ganglion (TG) comprises several receptors and signal molecules that are involved in the process of peripheral sensitization, which influences the development and persistence of neuropathic pain. Targeting TG can modulate this sensitization pathway and mediate the pain-relieving effect. So far,there are few studies in which modulation approaches to TG itself have been suggested so far. "Trigeminal ganglion modulation" and "trigeminal neuralgia" were used as search phrases in the Scopus Index and PubMed databases to discover articles that were pertinent to the topic. In this review, we address the role of the trigeminal ganglion in TN and underlying molecules and neuropeptides implicated in trigeminal pain pathways in processing pathological orofacial pain. We also reviewed different modulation approaches in TG for TN management. Furthermore, we discuss the prospect of targeting trigeminal ganglion to manage such intractable pain.

Pharmacological modulation of ventral tegmental area neurons elicits changes in trigeminovascular sensory processing and is accompanied by glycemic changes: Implications for migraine

BACKGROUND

Imaging migraine premonitory studies show increased midbrain activation consistent with the ventral tegmental area, an area involved in pain modulation and hedonic feeding. We investigated ventral tegmental area pharmacological modulation effects on trigeminovascular processing and consequent glycemic levels, which could be involved in appetite changes in susceptible migraine patients.

METHODS

Serotonin and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide receptors immunohistochemistry was performed in ventral tegmental area parabrachial pigmented nucleus of male Sprague Dawley rats. In vivo trigeminocervical complex neuronal responses to dura mater nociceptive electrical stimulation, and facial mechanical stimulation of the ophthalmic dermatome were recorded. Changes in trigeminocervical complex responses following ventral tegmental area parabrachial pigmented nucleus microinjection of glutamate, bicuculline, naratriptan, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 and quinpirole were measured, and blood glucose levels assessed pre- and post-microinjection.

RESULTS

Glutamatergic stimulation of ventral tegmental area parabrachial pigmented nucleus neurons reduced nociceptive and spontaneous trigeminocervical complex neuronal firing. Naratriptan, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 and quinpirole inhibited trigeminovascular spontaneous activity, and trigeminocervical complex neuronal responses to dural-evoked electrical and mechanical noxious stimulation. Trigeminovascular sensory processing through modulation of the ventral tegmental area parabrachial pigmented nucleus resulted in reduced circulating glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacological modulation of ventral tegmental area parabrachial pigmented nucleus neurons elicits changes in trigeminovascular sensory processing. The interplay between ventral tegmental area parabrachial pigmented nucleus activity and the sensory processing by the trigeminovascular system may be relevant to understand associated sensory and homeostatic symptoms in susceptible migraine patients.

The selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist lasmiditan inhibits trigeminal nociceptive processing: Implications for migraine and cluster headache

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lasmiditan is a novel selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist, recently approved for acute treatment of migraine. 5-HT1F receptors are widely expressed in the CNS and trigeminovascular system. Here, we have explored the therapeutic effects of 5-HT1F receptor activation in preclinical models of migraine and cluster headache.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Electrical stimulation of the dura mater or the superior salivatory nucleus in anaesthetised rats evoked trigeminovascular or trigeminal-autonomic reflex activation at the level of the trigeminocervical complex. Additionally, cranial autonomic manifestations in response to trigeminal-autonomic reflex activation were measured, via anterior choroidal blood flow alterations. These responses were then challenged with lasmiditan. We explored the tissue distribution of mRNA for 5-HT1F receptors in human post-mortem tissue and of several 5-HT1 receptor subtypes in specific tissue beds.

KEY RESULTS

Lasmiditan dose-dependently reduced trigeminovascular activation in a preclinical model of migraine. Lasmiditan also reduced superior salivatory nucleus-evoked activation of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex, but had no effect on cranial autonomic activation. mRNA profiling in human tissue showed expression of the 5-HT1F receptor in several structures relevant for migraine and cluster headache.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Our data suggest that lasmiditan acts, at least in part, as an anti-migraine agent by reducing trigeminovascular activation. Furthermore, our results highlight a clear action for lasmiditan in a preclinical model of cluster headache. Given the proven translational efficacy of this model, our data support the potential utility of lasmiditan as a therapeutic option for the acute treatment of cluster headache attacks.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed issue on Advances in Migraine and Headache Therapy (BJP 75th Anniversary). To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.3/issuetoc.

Intraventricular insulin adjacent to the arcuate nucleus reduced the formalin-induced pain through dorsal raphe nucleus opioid receptors in the STZ-induced diabetic rats

Diabetes mellitus is one of the diseases that affect nociception. In type 1 diabetes, the insulin release declines. One of the regions that respond to insulin and have insulin receptors is the hypothalamus, especially the arcuate nucleus. This hypothalamic nucleus has proopiomelanocortin (POMC)-containing neurons that affect the pain endogenous modulatory pathways such as dorsal raphe nucleus (DR) via releasing endorphins. So it was tried to investigate the influence of insulin within the arcuate nucleus with/without DR opioid receptors blockade on the nociception in the formalin test paradigm. In the present study, the role of different doses of insulin (2, 10, and 50 mIU/0.5 µl saline) within the arcuate nucleus was investigated via formalin test in type 1 (STZ-induced) diabetic rats. To perform the formalin test, 50 µl of formalin 2.5% was injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into the right palm. The behavior of the animal after the stimulation of pain receptors by s.c. formalin injection was scored from 0 (no distinguished pain) to 3 (the most nociception and highest pain score). Insulin within the arcuate nucleus diminished the nociception in formalin-induced paw in the STZ-induced diabetic rats. Intra-DR naloxone 0.2 µg/0.5 µl saline prevented this analgesia. A possible suggested mechanism for this observation is that insulin reinforces the POMC and endorphin release from the arcuate nucleus and decreases pain through DR.

Was it something I ate? Understanding the bidirectional interaction of migraine and appetite neural circuits

Migraine attacks can involve changes of appetite: while fasting or skipping meals are often reported triggers in susceptible individuals, hunger or food craving are reported in the premonitory phase. Over the last decade, there has been a growing interest and recognition of the importance of studying these overlapping fields of neuroscience, which has led to novel findings. The data suggest additional studies are needed to unravel key neurobiological mechanisms underlying the bidirectional interaction between migraine and appetite. Herein, we review information about the metabolic migraine phenotype and explore migraine therapeutic targets that have a strong input on appetite neuronal circuits, including the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and the orexins. Furthermore, we focus on potential therapeutic peptide targets that are involved in regulation of feeding and play a role in migraine pathophysiology, such as neuropeptide Y, insulin, glucagon and leptin. We then examine the orexigenic - anorexigenic circuit feedback loop and explore glucose metabolism disturbances. Additionally, it is proposed a different perspective on the most reported feeding-related trigger - skipping meals - as well as a link between contrasting feeding behaviors (skipping meals vs food craving). Our review aims to increase awareness of migraine through the lens of appetite neurobiology in order to improve our understanding of the earlier phase of migraine, encourage better studies and cross-disciplinary collaborations, and provide novel migraine-specific therapeutic opportunities.

Chronic Cluster Headache Update and East-West Comparisons: Focusing on Clinical Features, Pathophysiology, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an update on chronic cluster headache (CH) focusing on clinical features, pathophysiology, and management as well as comparisons between Eastern and Western populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chronic CH in Eastern populations was relatively rare, compared to that in Western populations. Lacrimation and/or conjunctival injection is the most frequently reported cranial autonomic symptom, and visual aura is predominant in chronic CH patients. Neuroimaging evidence in both ethnic groups suggests that CH pathophysiology involves the hypothalamus and pain-modulatory areas, with dynamic alternations between CH episodes. Recent evidence indicates that midbrain dopaminergic systems may participate in CH chronicity. Noteworthy advances have emerged in neuromodulatory therapies for chronic CH, but treatment with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies has been unsuccessful. Recent evidence shows divergence of chronic CH between Eastern and Western populations. Neuromodulatory therapies but not CGRP inhibition is effective in this intractable patient group.

Biochemical Modulation and Pathophysiology of Migraine

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a common disabling neurological disorder where attacks have been recognized to consist of more than headache. The premonitory, headache, and postdromal phases are the various phases of the migraine cycle, where aura can occur before, during, or after the onset of pain. Migraine is also associated with photosensitivity and cranial autonomic symptoms, which includes lacrimation, conjunctival injection, periorbital edema, ptosis, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhoea. This review will present the current understanding of migraine pathophysiology and the relationship to the observed symptoms.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The literature was reviewed with specific focus on clinical, neurophysiological, functional imaging, and preclinical studies in migraine including the studies on the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP).

RESULTS

The phases of the migraine cycle have been delineated by several studies. The observations of clinical symptoms help develop hypotheses of the key structures involved and the biochemical and neuronal pathways through which the effects are mediated. Preclinical studies and functional imaging studies have provided evidence for the role of multiple cortical areas, the diencephalon, especially the hypothalamus, and certain brainstem nuclei in the modulation of nociceptive processing, symptoms of the premonitory phase, aura, and photophobia. CGRP and PACAP have been found to be involved in nociceptive modulation and through exploration of CGRP mechanisms, new successful treatments have been developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine is a complex neural disorder and is important to understand when seeing patients who present to neuro-ophthalmology, especially with the successful translation from preclinical and clinical research leading to successful advances in migraine management.

Prophylactic Electroacupuncture on the Upper Cervical Segments Decreases Neuronal Discharges of the Trigeminocervical Complex in Migraine-Affected Rats: An in vivo Extracellular Electrophysiological Experiment

Purpose

This rat experiment aims to demonstrate the efficacy of electrical acupuncture in preventing migraine attacks by stimulating the acupoint GB20.

Introduction

Migraine, which takes 2ed at level four causes of GBD’s disease hierarchy, becomes a public health issue. It is important for physicians to supplement their knowledge of its treatment and consider alternative methods of therapy, such as acupuncture. However, the neurobiological and pathophysiological mechanisms of this prophylactic effect were unclear. The trigeminocervical complex is thought to be an important relay station in migraine pathophysiology as the key nuclei of the trigeminovascular system and the brainstem descending pain modulation system.

Methods

There were six groups involved in this study: control, model, electroacupuncture, non-acupoint electroacupuncture, saline+electroacupuncture and saline+non-acupoint electroacupuncture. We injected saline or inflammatory soup into dura mater to induce control or migraine in the rats. The mechanical pain threshold and the single-cell extraneural neurophysiology of the C1 spinal dorsal horn neurons in the trigeminocervical complex were detected.

Results

Pre-electroacupuncture could significantly increase the mechanical pain threshold of the periorbital region receptive field of the trigeminal nerve and decrease the discharges of neurons in the trigeminocervical complex. Acupuncture also reversed the abnormal skin pain response of the periorbital region receptive field of the trigeminal nerve caused by low-intensity stimulation.

Discussion

We believe that our study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it is the first of its kind to use GB20 to provide relief from migraine attacks and mechanical cephalic cutaneous hypersensitivity by regulating the neuronal discharge from trigeminocervical complex.

PACAP and Other Neuropeptide Targets Link Chronic Migraine and Opioid-induced Hyperalgesia in Mouse Models

Chronic use of opioids can produce opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH), and when used to treat migraine, these drugs can result in increased pain and headache chronicity. We hypothesized that overlapping mechanisms between OIH and chronic migraine occur through neuropeptide dysregulation. Using label-free, non-biased liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry to identify and measure changes in more than 1500 neuropeptides under these two conditions, we observed only 16 neuropeptides that were altered between the two conditions. The known pro-migraine molecule, calcitonin-gene related peptide, was among seven peptides associated with chronic migraine, with several pain-processing neuropeptides among the nine other peptides affected in OIH. Further, composite peptide complements Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and Secretogranin (SCG) showed significant changes in both chronic migraine and OIH. In a follow-up pharmacological study, we confirmed the role of PACAP in models of these two disorders, validating the effectiveness of our peptidomic approach, and identifying PACAP as a mechanistic link between chronic migraine and OIH. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD013362.

The Migraine Premonitory Phase

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The premonitory phase of migraine is defined as the presence of nonpainful symptomatology occurring hours to days before the onset of headache. Symptoms can include neck stiffness, yawning, thirst, and increased frequency of micturition. Clinical recognition of these symptoms is important to ensure early and effective attack management. Further understanding of the clinical phenotype and neurobiological mediation of these symptoms is important in the advancement of therapeutics research in both acute and preventive treatments of migraine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since 2014, functional imaging studies have been conducted during the premonitory stage of migraine and have provided novel insights into the early neurobiology and anatomy of the earliest stage of the migraine attack. These studies have shown early involvement of subcortical brain areas including the hypothalamus, substantia nigra, dorsal pons, and various limbic cortical areas, including the anterior cingulate cortex during the premonitory phase. More recent work has revealed altered hypothalamic-brainstem functional connectivity during migraine, which starts before the onset of pain. These exciting findings have provided functional correlation of the symptoms experienced by patients and changes seen on functional brain imaging.

SUMMARY

This article focuses on the prevalence, phenotype, and proposed neurobiology of premonitory symptomatology in migraineurs as well as the scope of future research.

Primary headache disorders: Five new things

Purpose of review

To review 5 new areas in primary headache disorders, especially migraine and cluster headache.

Recent findings

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists (gepants-rimegepant and ubrogepant) and serotonin 5-HT_1F receptor agonists (ditans-lasmiditan) have completed phase 3 clinical trials and will soon offer novel, effective, well-tolerated nonvasoconstrictor options to treat acute migraine. CGRP preventive treatment is being revolutionized after the licensing of 3 monoclonal antibodies (MABs), erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab, with eptinezumab to follow, especially designed for migraine; they are effective and well tolerated. For patients seeking a nondrug therapy, neuromodulation approaches, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS), and external trigeminal nerve stimulation, represent licensed, well-tolerated approaches to migraine treatment. For the acute treatment of episodic cluster headache, nVNS is effective, well tolerated, and licensed; nVNS is effective and well tolerated in preventive treatment of cluster headache. The CGRP MAB galcanezumab was effective and well tolerated in a placebo-controlled trial in the preventive treatment of episodic cluster headache. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in 2 randomized sham-controlled studies on chronic cluster headache. Understanding the premonitory (prodromal) phase of migraine during which patients experience symptoms such as yawning, tiredness, cognitive dysfunction, and food cravings may help explain apparent migraine triggers in some patients, thus offering better self-management.

Summary

Headache medicine has made remarkable strides, particularly in understanding migraine and cluster headache in the past 5 years. For the most common reason to visit a neurologist, therapeutic advances offer patients reduced disability and neurologists a rewarding, key role in improving the lives of those with migraine and cluster headache.

Neurovascular mechanisms of migraine and cluster headache

Vascular theories of migraine and cluster headache have dominated for many years the pathobiological concept of these disorders. This view is supported by observations that trigeminal activation induces a vascular response and that several vasodilating molecules trigger acute attacks of migraine and cluster headache in susceptible individuals. Over the past 30 years, this rationale has been questioned as it became clear that the actions of some of these molecules, in particular, calcitonin gene-related peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide, extend far beyond the vasoactive effects, as they possess the ability to modulate nociceptive neuronal activity in several key regions of the trigeminovascular system. These findings have shifted our understanding of these disorders to a primarily neuronal origin with the vascular manifestations being the consequence rather than the origin of trigeminal activation. Nevertheless, the neurovascular component, or coupling, seems to be far more complex than initially thought, being involved in several accompanying features. The review will discuss in detail the anatomical basis and the functional role of the neurovascular mechanisms relevant to migraine and cluster headache.

A Neural Circuit for the Suppression of Pain by a Competing Need State

Hunger and pain are two competing signals that individuals must resolve to ensure survival. However, the neural processes that prioritize conflicting survival needs are poorly understood. We discovered that hunger attenuates behavioral responses and affective properties of inflammatory pain without altering acute nociceptive responses. This effect is centrally controlled, as activity in hunger-sensitive agouti-related protein (AgRP)-expressing neurons abrogates inflammatory pain. Systematic analysis of AgRP projection subpopulations revealed that the neural processing of hunger and inflammatory pain converge in the hindbrain parabrachial nucleus (PBN). Strikingly, activity in AgRP → PBN neurons blocked the behavioral response to inflammatory pain as effectively as hunger or analgesics. The anti-nociceptive effect of hunger is mediated by neuropeptide Y (NPY) signaling in the PBN. By investigating the intersection between hunger and pain, we have identified a neural circuit that mediates competing survival needs and uncovered NPY Y1 receptor signaling in the PBN as a target for pain suppression.

Update on the pathophysiology of cluster headache: imaging and neuropeptide studies

OBJECTIVE

Cluster headache (CH) is the most severe primary headache condition. Its pathophysiology is multifaceted and incompletely understood. This review brings together the latest neuroimaging and neuropeptide evidence on the pathophysiology of CH.

METHODS

A review of the literature was conducted by searching PubMed and Web of Science. The search was conducted using the following keywords: imaging studies, voxel-based morphometry, diffusion-tensor imaging, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, tractography, connectivity, cerebral networks, neuromodulation, central modulation, deep brain stimulation, orexin-A, orexin-B, tract-based spatial statistics, single-photon emission computer tomography studies, positron-emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, trigeminovascular system, neuropeptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide, neurokinin A, substance P, nitric oxide synthase, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, neuropeptide Y, acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and ATP. "Cluster headache" was combined with each keyword for more relevant results. All irrelevant and duplicated records were excluded. Search dates were from October 1976 to May 2018.

RESULTS

Neuroimaging studies support the role of the hypothalamus in CH, as well as other brain areas involved in the pain matrix. Activation of the trigeminovascular system and the release of neuropeptides play an important role in CH pathophysiology. Among neuropeptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide have been reported to be reliable biomarkers for CH attacks, though not specific for CH. Several other neuropeptides are involved in trigeminovascular activation, but the current evidence does not qualify them as reliable biomarkers in CH.

CONCLUSION

CH has a complex pathophysiology and the pain mechanism is not completely understood. Recent neuroimaging studies have provided insight into the functional and structural network bases of CH pathophysiology. Although there has been important progress in neuropeptide studies, a specific biomarker for CH is yet to be found.

Targeted Orexin and Hypothalamic Neuropeptides for Migraine

The hypothalamus is involved in the regulation of homeostatic mechanisms and migraine-related trigeminal nociception and as such has been hypothesized to play a central role in the migraine syndrome from the earliest stages of the attack. The hypothalamus hosts many key neuropeptide systems that have been postulated to play a role in this pathophysiology. Such neuropeptides include but are not exclusive too orexins, oxytocin, neuropeptide Y, and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating protein, which will be the focus of this review. Each of these peptides has its own unique physiological role and as such many preclinical studies have been conducted targeting these peptide systems with evidence supporting their role in migraine pathophysiology. Preclinical studies have also begun to explore potential therapeutic compounds targeting these systems with some success in all cases. Clinical efficacy of dual orexin receptor antagonists and intranasal oxytocin have been tested; however, both have yet to demonstrate clinical effect. Despite this, there were limitations in these cases and strong arguments can be made for the further development of intranasal oxytocin for migraine prophylaxis. Regarding neuropeptide Y, work has yet to begun in a clinical setting, and clinical trials for pituitary adenylate cyclase activating protein are just beginning to be established with much optimism. Regardless, it is becoming increasingly clear the prominent role that the hypothalamus and its peptide systems have in migraine pathophysiology. Much work is required to better understand this system and the early stages of the attack to develop more targeted and effective therapies aimed at reducing attack susceptibility with the potential to prevent the attack all together.

Biology of Neuropeptides: Orexinergic Involvement in Primary Headache Disorders

Migraine is a very common, severe disabling condition that can last for days and strike multiple times per month. Attacks, often characterized by severe unilateral throbbing pain that is exacerbated by activity, are commonly preceded by several diverse symptoms including fatigue, irritability, and yawning. This premonitory (prodromal) phase represents the earliest identifiable feature of an attack that is a reliable predictor of ensuing headache. The diversity of these symptoms underlines the complex nature of migraine and focuses considerable attention on the hypothalamus due to its prominent role in homeostatic regulation allowing state dependent behavioral modifications. While multiple neurotransmitter and neuropeptide systems have been proposed to play a role in migraine, the current review will focus on the emerging role of the hypothalamic orexinergic system in primary headache disorders. Specifically the potential role of altered orexinergic signalling in premonitory symptomatology and the future potential of targeted orexinergic therapies that could with other approaches act during the premonitory phase to prevent the occurrence of the headache or reduce an individual's susceptibility to attacks by altering the brain's response to external and internal triggers.

Overview of Neuropeptides: Awakening the Senses?

Humans have a diverse collection of neuropeptides that can influence a multitude of activities. There are now over 100 known neuropeptides and probably many more yet to be identified from the over 1000 predicted peptides encoded in the genome. While diverse, peptides generally share three common characteristics: (1) post-translational processing and release from vesicles, (2) activation of cell-surface receptors over a relatively large distance, and (3) modulation of target cells that are often in the brain and periphery. Within the brain, neuropeptides can modulate the activity of co-released neurotransmitters to either increase or decrease the strength of synaptic signaling. Within the periphery, neuropeptides can function similar to peptide hormones and modulate nearly all bodily functions. Given the clear involvement of the neuropeptide CGRP in migraine and the emerging evidence for other peptides, it seems likely that neuropeptides may help "awaken" the senses and contribute to the heightened sensory state of migraine.

Determinants of glucose metabolism and the role of NPY in the progression of insulin resistance in chronic migraine

Background Chronic migraine has a well-documented association with increased insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. The hypothalamus may play a role in the progression of insulin resistance in chronic migraine through the regulation of orexigenic peptides such as neuropeptide Y. Insulin resistance may lead to increased risk of future type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic migraine, which is more likely to occur if other pathogenetic defects of type 2 diabetes mellitus, such as impaired pancreatic β-cell functions and defects in intestinal glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion after meals. We studied the relationship of fasting neuropeptide Y with insulin resistance, β-cell function, and glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion in non-obese female chronic migraine patients. We also aimed to investigate glucose-stimulated insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 secretions as early pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for the development of carbohydrate intolerance. Methods In this cross-sectional controlled study, 83 non-obese female migraine patients of reproductive age categorized as having episodic migraine or chronic migraine were included. The control group consisted of 36 healthy females. We studied glucose-stimulated insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion during a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. We investigated the relationship of neuropeptide Y levels with insulin resistance and β-cell insulin secretion functions. Results Fasting glucose levels were significantly higher in migraine patients. Plasma glucose and insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test were otherwise similar in chronic migraine, episodic migraine and controls. Patients with chronic migraine were more insulin resistant than episodic migraine or controls ( p = 0.048). Glucagon-like peptide-1 levels both at fasting and two hours after glucose intake were similar in chronic migraine, episodic migraine, and controls. Neuropeptide Y levels were higher in migraineurs. In chronic migraine, neuropeptide Y was positively correlated with fasting glucagon-like peptide-1 levels (r = 0.57, p = 0.04), but there was no correlation with insulin resistance (r = 0.49, p = 0.09) or β-cell function (r = 0.50, p = 0.07). Discussion Non-obese premenopausal female patients with chronic migraine have higher insulin resistance, but normal β-cell function is to compensate for the increased insulin demand during fasting and after glucose intake. Increased fasting neuropeptide Y levels in migraine may be a factor leading to increased insulin resistance by specific alterations in energy intake and activation of the sympathoadrenal system.

Blockade of 5-HT3 receptors with granisetron does not affect trigeminothalamic nociceptive transmission in rats: Implication for migraine

One way to expand the existing range of anti-migraine drugs seems to be the search for pharmacological agents with anti-cephalalgic properties among medicines approved for clinical indications other than migraine. Numerous experimental and clinical data imply that selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists can be considered as potential anti-migraine agents. Therefore, the objective of our work was to examine the impact of selective 5-HT3 receptor blockade with granisetron on migraine-related nociceptive transmission within the spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN) and the ventroposteromedial nucleus of the thalamus (VPM). Using an electrophysiological model of trigemino-durovascular nociception in anaesthetised male Wistar rats, we evaluated the effects of intravenous administration of granisetron on ongoing firing and dural electrical stimulation-evoked responses of the spinal trigeminal and thalamic cells. Granisetron did not substantially affect responses of the STN and VPM neurons to electrical stimulation of the dura mater as well as did not cause steady changes in ongoing firing of the spinal trigeminal cells. The results obtained argue against the use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for treating migraine. These data also lead to the conclusion that in the absence of sustained sensitisation of neurons along the trigemino-thalamo-cortical pathway the role of 5-HT3 receptor-dependent mechanisms in serotonergic modulation of trigeminovascular nociceptive transmission can hardly be considered crucial.

An update on migraine: current understanding and future directions

Migraine is a common brain disorder with high disability rates which involves a series of abnormal neuronal networks, interacting at different levels of the central and peripheral nervous system. An increase in the interest around migraine pathophysiology has allowed researchers to unravel certain neurophysiological mechanisms and neurotransmitter involvement culminating in the recent development of novel therapies, which might substantially change the clinical approach to migraine patients. The present review will highlight the current aspects of migraine pathophysiology, covering an understanding of the complex workings of the migraine state and the brain regions responsible for them. We will further discuss the therapeutic agents which have appeared in the most recent years for migraine care, from calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists, gepants; through serotonin 5-HT1F receptor agonists, ditans, and CGRP or CGRP receptor monoclonal antibodies to invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques.

Spinal activation of the NPY Y1 receptor reduces mechanical and cold allodynia in rats with chronic constriction injury

Neuropeptide tyrosine (NPY) and its associated receptors Y1R and Y2R have been previously implicated in the spinal modulation of neuropathic pain induced by total or partial sectioning of the sciatic nerve. However, their role in chronic constrictive injuries of the sciatic nerve has not yet been described. In the present study, we analyzed the consequences of pharmacological activation of spinal Y1R, by using the specific Y1R agonist Leu³¹Pro³⁴-NPY, in rats with chronic constriction injury (CCI). CCI and sham-injury rats were implanted with a permanent intrathecal catheter (at day 7 after injury), and their response to the administration of different doses (2.5, 5, 7, 10 or 20μg) of Leu³¹Pro³⁴-NPY (at a volume of 10μl) through the implanted catheter, recorded 14days after injury. Mechanical allodynia was tested by means of the up-and-down method, using von Frey filaments. Cold allodynia was tested by application of an acetone drop to the affected hindpaw. Intrathecal Leu³¹Pro³⁴-NPY induced an increase of mechanical thresholds in rats with CCI, starting at doses of 5μg and becoming stronger with higher doses. Intrathecal Leu³¹Pro³⁴ also resulted in reductions in the frequency of withdrawal to cold stimuli, although the effect was somewhat more moderate and mostly observed for doses of 7μg and higher. We thus show that spinal activation of the Y1R is able to reduce neuropathic pain due to a chronic constrictive injury and, together with other studies, support the use of a spinal Y1R agonist as a therapeutic agent against chronic pain induced by peripheral neuropathy.

Neuroendocrine signaling modulates specific neural networks relevant to migraine

Migraine is a disabling brain disorder involving abnormal trigeminovascular activation and sensitization. Fasting or skipping meals is considered a migraine trigger and altered fasting glucose and insulin levels have been observed in migraineurs. Therefore peptides involved in appetite and glucose regulation including insulin, glucagon and leptin could potentially influence migraine neurobiology. We aimed to determine the effect of insulin (10U·kg^-1), glucagon (100μg·200μl^-1) and leptin (0.3, 1 and 3mg·kg^-1) signaling on trigeminovascular nociceptive processing at the level of the trigeminocervical-complex and hypothalamus. Male rats were anesthetized and prepared for craniovascular stimulation. In vivo electrophysiology was used to determine changes in trigeminocervical neuronal responses to dural electrical stimulation, and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (pERK1/2) immunohistochemistry to determine trigeminocervical and hypothalamic neural activity; both in response to intravenous administration of insulin, glucagon, leptin or vehicle control in combination with blood glucose analysis. Blood glucose levels were significantly decreased by insulin (p<0.001) and leptin (p<0.01) whereas glucagon had the opposite effect (p<0.001). Dural-evoked neuronal firing in the trigeminocervical-complex was significantly inhibited by insulin (p<0.001), glucagon (p<0.05) and leptin (p<0.01). Trigeminocervical-complex pERK1/2 cell expression was significantly decreased by insulin and leptin (both p<0.001), and increased by glucagon (p<0.001), when compared to vehicle control. However, only leptin affected pERK1/2 expression in the hypothalamus, significantly decreasing pERK1/2 immunoreactive cell expression in the arcuate nucleus (p<0.05). These findings demonstrate that insulin, glucagon and leptin can alter the transmission of trigeminal nociceptive inputs. A potential neurobiological link between migraine and impaired metabolic homeostasis may occur through disturbed glucose regulation and a transient hypothalamic dysfunction.