Effectiveness and safety of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster on localized neuropathic pain after knee surgery: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial

Pharmacologically enabling the degradation of Na V 1.8 channels to reduce neuropathic pain

ABSTRACT

In phase II clinical trials, Na V 1.8 channels were identified as viable targets to treat acute pain. Results were modest, however, and Na V 1.8 pore blockers must be given systemically, potentially leading to adverse effects, especially during prolonged use. A local, long-lasting approach is desirable, yet local anesthetics are neither specific nor long-lasting. In lieu of a pore blocker approach, we show a pharmacological method targeting the scaffolding and degradation of Na V 1.8 channels, which attenuated neuropathic pain behavior in mice. Na V 1.8 channels interact with the WW domain-containing scaffold protein called Magi-1. WW domains are typically found in ubiquitin ligases, and Na V 1.8 channels are susceptible to degradation by ubiquitin ligases. Here, we show Na V 1.8 and MAGI-1 colocalized in human tissues. We demonstrate that a lipidated peptide derived from the Na V 1.8 WW binding domain, at sub-micromolar concentrations, inhibited rodent dorsal root ganglion neuronal firing. The peptide reduced Na V 1.8 channel immunoreactivity and tetrodotoxin-resistant currents in human dorsal root ganglion neurons. We found that the lipidated peptide attenuated neuropathic pain behaviors in mice for multiple weeks after a single injection. Our results reveal that the Na V 1.8-targeted lipidated peptide provides local and sustained analgesia, serving as a viable alternative to Na V 1.8 pore blockers.

The effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on subarachnoid anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

Intravenous lidocaine is a non-opioid analgesic adjunct for perioperative pain relief. The aim of our study was to explore whether concurrent administration of intravenous lidocaine prolongs the duration of sensory block during total knee replacement (TKR) under spinal anaesthesia.

METHODS

This prospective randomized double blind controlled trial was conducted on 28 patients (14 in lidocaine group and 14 in the control group) undergoing unilateral TKR under spinal anesthesia. In the lidocaine group, intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg·kg-1 followed by an infusion of 1.5 mg·kg-1·h-1 was administered intraoperatively after spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was the duration of sensory block of spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included onset time of sensory and motor block, duration of motor block, time to first postoperative analgesic, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and postoperative analgesia requirement in 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

The duration of sensory and motor block was longer in the lidocaine group (Mean ± SD; 112.50 ± 5.80 min versus 78.21 ± 9.12 min; p < 0.001 and 237.14 ± 9.14 min versus 215.00 ± 10.12 min; p < 0.001, respectively). Time to requirement of first rescue analgesia was 184.29 ± 9.38 min in the lidocaine group and 127.14 ± 23.35 min in the control group (p < 0.001). VAS scores were lower in the lidocaine group at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery (p < 0.00001, p < 0.00001, p < 0.00006, p = 0.032, respectively). Requirement of additional analgesia in the first 24 h was higher in the control group. There were no clinical signs to suggest lidocaine toxicity in any patient.

CONCLUSION

During unilateral TKR under spinal anaesthesia, concurrent use of intravenous lidocaine prolonged sensory block and reduced postoperative analgesic requirements.

Pharmacological Pain Treatment in Older Persons

Pharmacological pain treatment in older persons is presented by a multi-disciplinary group of European pain experts. Drugs recommended for acute or chronic nociceptive pain, also for neuropathic pain and the routes of administration of choice are the same as those prescribed for younger persons but comorbidities and polypharmacy in older persons increase the risk of adverse effects and drug interactions. Not all drugs are available or authorised in all European countries. For mild-to-moderate pain, non-opioids including paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first-line treatments, followed by nefopam and metamizole. Codeine, dihydrocodeine and tramadol are prescribed for moderate to severe pain and 'strong' opioids, including morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, methadone and tapentadol, for severe pain. Chronic neuropathic pain treatment relies on coanalgesics, including anti-epileptics (gabapentinoids) and anti-depressants with additional option of topical lidocaine and capsaicine. The choice of analgesic(s) and the route of administration should be guided by the pain characteristics, as well as by the patient's comorbidities, organ function and medications. Several directions have been highlighted to optimise pharmacological pain management in older individuals: (1) before starting pain treatment adequately detect and assess pain and always perform a full geriatric assessment, (2) consider kidney function systematically to adjust the doses of analgesics and avoid the risks of overdose, (3) start with the lowest dose of an analgesic and increase it gradually under the control of the effect, (4) involve the older persons and family in their treatment, (5) reevaluate pain regularly during treatment and (6) combine pharmacological treatment with non-pharmacological approaches.

The PATCH trial: 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster for trigeminal neuralgia-Results of a multicentric, enriched enrollment, randomized withdrawal, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the efficacy and safety of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (LMP) in patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN).

BACKGROUND

TN is an excruciatingly painful type of neuropathic facial pain. Anti-epileptics are the first-line treatment for TN; however, these oral drugs alone sometimes fail to achieve satisfactory analgesic effects. Two retrospective studies have shown that LMP can be an effective and safe treatment option for some patients with TN. No other high-quality clinical studies have explored the effect and safety of LMP in patients with TN.

METHODS

The PATCH trial is an enriched enrollment with randomized withdrawal, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group trial performed at five study centers. Eligible patients with TN received LMP during a 3-week initial open-label phase. Patients who met the response criteria entered the double-blind treatment phase and were randomly assigned for treatment with either LMP (LMP group) or vehicle patches (control group) at a 1:1 ratio. Patients who met the criteria for treatment failure were withdrawn from the double-blind treatment phase, and treatment was continued in the remaining patients for up to 28 days. The primary outcome was the number of treatment failures. The secondary endpoints were the time to loss of therapeutic response (LTR) in the double-blind phase and the weekly mean pain severity in both the open-label phase and the double-blind phase of the study.

RESULTS

The first patient was enrolled in this study on May 1, 2021, and the enrollment of the last patient was completed on August 26, 2022. A total of 307 patients were initially screened, 226 (74.0%) of whom entered the open-label phase. Of the 226 respondents, 124 (55.0%) were randomized to the double-blind phase. In the double-blind phase, 62 patients were assigned to the LMP group, and 62 were assigned to the control group. For the primary endpoint, 16 (26.0%) patients with LMP and 36 (58.0%) patients with vehicle patches met the treatment failure criteria during the double-blind phase (relative risk, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.75; p < 0.001). The survival curve of the LTR showed that the LTR of LMP was significantly longer than that of the vehicle patches (hazard ratio, 0.275; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.50; log-rank p < 0.001). LMP also significantly reduced the weekly mean pain severity in the double-blind phase of the study (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

LMP produced partial relief of pain symptoms in some patients with TN. For responders, LMP may be used as an add-on therapy in a multidrug treatment protocol.

Effect of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster in preventing chronic postsurgical pain after knee replacement: protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Background

With an aging population, knee arthroplasty is increasingly common; however, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects up to 30% of patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster (LP5) in preventing CPSP among patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

Methods

This is a dual-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 128 adult patients scheduled for knee arthroplasty. Participants will be randomly assigned, stratified by center, to either the LP5 group or the placebo group (n = 64 per group). The LP5 or placebo group will apply the patch 1 day before surgery and on postoperative days 1-3, with multimodal analgesia administered postoperatively. Multimodal analgesia will include intraoperative flurbiprofen axetil and postoperative patient-controlled sufentanil. The primary outcome is the pain subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes will include WOMAC stiffness, function, and total scales; Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) Pain Scale; 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); postoperative pain scores; Visual Analog Scale (VAS) sleep scores; postoperative sufentanil consumption; need for rescue analgesia; length of Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) stay; length of hospital stay; and 90-day mortality. Safety outcomes will include assessments of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, arrhythmia, interventions for haemodynamic events, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, local skin allergy, wound infection, and toxic reaction. Data will be analyzed following a modified intention-to-treat approach.

Discussion

This study aims to provide high-quality evidence for the efficacy and safety of LP5 in preventing CPSP in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

Postsurgical tactile-evoked pain: a role for brain-derived neurotrophic factor-tropomyosin receptor kinase B-dependent novel tactile corpuscles

Introduction

Millions of people undergo surgical procedures each year with many developing postsurgical pain. Dynamic allodynia can arise when, for example, clothing brushing close to the surgical site elicits pain. The allodynia circuits that enable crosstalk between afferent tactile inputs and central pain circuits have been studied, but the peripheral tactile drive has not been explored.

Objective

Investigate the innervation of the skin in the rat plantar hindpaw skin-muscle incision model.

Results

Incision increased epidermal thickness and cell layers and reduced intraepidermal nerve fibre density, identified with PGP9.5 immunostaining. Strikingly, Collagen IV immunostaining revealed the development of dermal protrusions, oriented towards the incision site, that were reminiscent of the dermal papillae that exist in glabrous footpads. S100 immunostaining for lamellar Schwann cells revealed the presence of novel tactile corpuscles (S100-positive bulb) within incision-induced putative dermal papillae. The occurrence of these novel tactile corpuscles coincided with behavioural observations of dynamic allodynia. Tactile corpuscles require brain-derived neurotrophic factor- tropomyosin receptor kinase B (BDNF-TrkB) signalling to form during development, and an increase in BDNF-immunostaining intensity was observed close to the incision site. Local acute administration of TrkB-Fc, to block BDNF-TrkB signalling, reduced, by approximately 50%, both tactile corpuscle size (S100+ bulb area) and dynamic allodynia.

Conclusion

Surgery induces the development of novel tactile corpuscles in the incision surround, in a BDNF-TrKB-dependent manner, that contributes to postsurgical tactile-evoked pain.

Pharmacotherapy and noninvasive neurostimulation for neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain poses a significant challenge due to its complex mechanisms, necessitating specific treatments. In recent decades, significant progress has been made in the clinical research of neuropathic pain, marking a shift from empirical strategies to evidence-based medicine in its management. This review outlines both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Antidepressants (tricyclic and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors), antiepileptics (gabapentin, pregabalin), and topical agents constitute the main pharmacological treatments. These approaches target peripheral or central mechanisms associated with neuropathic pain. Noninvasive neurostimulation, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), provides non-pharmacological alternatives. However, challenges persist in effectively targeting existing medications and developing drugs that act on novel targets, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies.

Effect and safety profile of topical lidocaine on post-surgical neuropathic pain and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Post-surgical chronic pain with a neuropathic component is usually more severe and leads to worse quality of life. We conducted this systematic review to examine the evidence of topical lidocaine for post-surgical neuropathic pain.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

SETTING

Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing topical lidocaine with placebo or no topical lidocaine for post-surgical neuropathic pain.

PATIENTS

Seven RCTs including 585 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

We systematically searched databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect and safety outcomes of topical lidocaine compared with placebo or no intervention.

MEASUREMENTS

We conducted meta-analyses to evaluate the effect of topical lidocaine on pain intensity, adverse events, and quality of life. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs were effect measures for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. We assessed the risk of bias of included trials and the certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Our review included 7 studies with 585 participants. There is moderate certainty evidence that topical lidocaine may increase the likelihood of global pain relief, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.98 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 3.76; I2 = 70%, P = 0.04). Low certainty evidence suggested topical lidocaine may lead to more reduction in pain intensity (SMD: -0.70; 95% confidence interval: -1.46, 0.06; I2 = 93%, P = 0.07). High certainty evidence showed that topical lidocaine did not increase the adverse event risk (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93, 1.16; I2 = 0%, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical lidocaine may lead to pain relief and is safe to use for patient with post-surgical pain, though its impact on quality of life is unclear. This review supports the use of topical lidocaine for patients with post-surgical pain, and reveals the evidence gap in topical lidocaine use. (Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021294100).

The relevance of real-world data for the evaluation of neuropathic pain treatments

Treatment of neuropathic pain (NP) is challenging. Interest in real-world evidence (RWE) for benefit-risk assessments of NP treatments increases given the paucity of drugs showing efficacy in randomized controlled trials and restricted labels of available medicines. To provide further context, a literature review regarding regulatory use of RWE and a clinical trial registry search for randomized controlled trials over the last 10 years was carried out. Taken together, and especially for available NP treatments, there is increasing support to consider RWE when evaluating their benefit-risk profile. Examples are provided in which RWE could be used effectively for updating the product label and informing treatment recommendations. Collected and analyzed according to state-of-the-art standards, RWE can inform treatment recommendations and product label decisions.

Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Patch in the Management of Acute Postoperative Wound Pain: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to quantify the pooled effects of lidocaine patch (LP) on postoperative pain and side-effects through a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

APPROACH

The study followed PRISMA, AMSTAR and the Cochrane Collaboration. Randomized controlled trials s comparing LP with placebo were retrieved from five electronic databases. Primary outcome in the study was cumulative intravenous morphine equivalent consumption (mg) within 24 hours postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twelve trials comprising 617 patients were included in the final analysis. Primary result indicated that the analgesic effects LP were only statistical but not clinically significant of postoperative intravenous morphine consumption within 24 hours (mean difference, -4.61 mg; 95% CI, -8.09, -1.14). Interestingly, the results of subgroup and meta-regression analysis indicated that preoperative administration of LP had potential advantages in postoperative wound pain management. It is also worthwhile to mention that LP provided a clinically important benefit in rest pain scores within 24-hour postoperatively. Apart from these, other secondary outcome analysis did not uncover any particularly significant analgesic or safety advantages to LP. Finally, LP also does not increase the risk of any local anesthetic-related side effects.

INNOVATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis provides moderate-to-high quality evidence undermining the role of LP for management of acute postoperative wound pain following surgical procedures and the justification for the associated extra costs.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, the current evidence does not support LP as part of a routine multimodal analgesia strategy to alleviate early postoperative acute pain. However, further studies should explore the clinical value of preoperative administration and the long-term effect of LP.

Postsurgical neuropathic pain: lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster or oral treatments in clinical practice

Aim: To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of the lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) and oral first-line medications (OM) for the treatment of postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP) in routine clinical practice. Patients & methods: Data from a noninterventional, retrospective 24-week cohort study in patients with localized peripheral NP refractory to at least one recommended OM using anonymized German Pain eRegistry data were retrieved. A subgroup analysis was conducted on 531 datasets of PSNP patients. Results: Pain relief, improvements in pain-related impairments of daily living and quality of life, and tolerability were significantly greater under LMP than under OM (p < 0.001 for all parameters). Conclusion: These real-world data show the effectiveness and good tolerability of LMP for PSNP treatment in routine clinical practice.

Localized peripheral neuropathic pain: topical treatment with lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster in routine clinical practice

Aim: To provide real-world evidence for the effectiveness and tolerability of lidocaine 700 mg medicated plaster (LMP) in localized peripheral neuropathic pain (l-PNP) treatment compared with first-line oral medications (OM). Patients & methods: This was a noninterventional, retrospective 6-month cohort study in patients refractory to at least one recommended OM, using anonymized medical care data from the German Pain eRegistry. Treatment groups were matched by propensity scoring, considering seven predefined confounding factors. The primary effectiveness end point was the absolute change in average pain intensity index from baseline at weeks 4, 12 and 24 of treatment and over the treatment period. Results: A total of 3081 datasets were retained per treatment group. LMP provided superior pain reductions and significantly greater improvements in pain-related impairments of daily living and quality of life with significantly better tolerability (p < 0.001 for all parameters) than OM. Conclusion: These real-world data confirm the effectiveness and good tolerability of LMP for l-PNP treatment under routine medical care.

Glycosides for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Potential Medicinal Components

Neuropathic pain is a refractory disease that occurs across the world and pharmacotherapy has limited efficacy and/or safety. This disease imposes a significant burden on both the somatic and mental health of patients; indeed, some patients have referred to neuropathic pain as being 'worse than death'. The pharmacological agents that are used to treat neuropathic pain at present can produce mild effects in certain patients, and induce many adverse reactions, such as sedation, dizziness, vomiting, and peripheral oedema. Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover novel drugs that are safer and more effective. Natural compounds from medical plants have become potential sources of analgesics, and evidence has shown that glycosides alleviated neuropathic pain via regulating oxidative stress, transcriptional regulation, ion channels, membrane receptors and so on. In this review, we summarize the epidemiology of neuropathic pain and the existing therapeutic drugs used for disease prevention and treatment. We also demonstrate how glycosides exhibit an antinociceptive effect on neuropathic pain in laboratory research and describe the antinociceptive mechanisms involved to facilitate the discovery of new drugs to improve the quality of life of patients experiencing neuropathic pain.

Analgesic Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Trial Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

The chronic neuropathic pain associated with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) can last for several months or even many years, seriously affecting the affected person's work, sleep, mood, and daily life activities. In generaly, current treatments for PHN are at best limited and unsatisfactory, and adverse reactions are common, especially in elderly patients. Electroacupuncture (EA) is widely used clinically to manage painful diseases, but there remains a lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of EA on PHN. This study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of EA on PHN, and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for EA treatment of PHN.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial will recruit 448 patients with PHN at seven clinical centers. Multicenter stratified variable block randomization will be used, and the eligible patients will be randomly allocated in a ratio of 1:1 to the EA group or sham EA group. The EA group will receive 4 weeks of EA treatment, given as 30-min treatment sessions, once daily, 5 times per week, for a total of 20 treatments; the sham EA group will receive sham EA treatment under the same conditions.

PLANNED OUTCOMES

The primary outcome measure is the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale pain score at week 4. The secondary outcome measures, including mechanical pain threshold, pain area of PHN, average number of pain episodes, the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2, Zoster Brief Pain Inventory, the Depression, Anxiety, and Positive Outlook Scale, Patient Global Impression of Change, safety of EA, and use of concomitant medications, among others. The primary analysis of the outcomes will be the mixed-effect model with repeated measurement between groups on an intent-to-treat population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04560361. Registered 23 September 2020 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04560361?term=NCT04560361&draw=2&rank=1 ).

Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD) is proposed as a treatment mechanism for chronic pain but remains untested in clinical populations. Two interlinked studies; (1) A patient-assessor blinded, randomised, sham-controlled clinical trial and (2) an open-label mechanistic study, sought to examine therapeutic LTD for persons with chronic peripheral nerve injury pain.

METHODS

(1) Patients were randomised using a concealed, computer-generated schedule to either active or sham non-invasive low-frequency nerve stimulation (LFS), for 3 months (minimum 10 min/day). The primary outcome was average pain intensity (0-10 Likert scale) recorded over 1 week, at 3 months, compared between study groups. (2) On trial completion, consenting subjects entered a mechanistic study assessing somatosensory changes in response to LFS.

RESULTS

(1) 76 patients were randomised (38 per group), with 65 (31 active, 34 sham) included in the intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was not significant, pain scores were 0.3 units lower in active group (95% CI - 1.0, 0.3; p = 0.30) giving an effect size of 0.19 (Cohen's D). Two non-device related serious adverse events were reported. (2) In the mechanistic study (n = 19) primary outcomes of mechanical pain sensitivity (p = 0.006) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (p = 0.043) significantly improved indicating reduced mechanical hyperalgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the RCT failed to reach significance. Results from the mechanistic study provide new evidence for effective induction of LTD in a clinical population. Taken together results add to mechanistic understanding of LTD and help inform future study design and approaches to treatment. Trial registration ISRCTN53432663.

Topical Lidocaine for Chronic Pain Treatment

Topical lidocaine is widely used in current practice for a variety of pain conditions. This literature review shows that its limited absorption and relative lack of systemic adverse events are an attractive analgesic option for a number of vulnerable patients. Topical lidocaine has been approved by health authorities for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia in a number of countries, and studies present some degree of evidence of its efficacy and safety in postsurgical pain, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, chronic lower back pain and osteoarthritis. Topical lidocaine may be a great alternative alone or in addition to systemic drugs and non-pharmacological approaches for an optimized pain management and in multimodal analgesia.

Thermal hyperalgesia and dynamic weight bearing share similar recovery dynamics in a sciatic nerve entrapment injury model

•

The sciatic nerve cuff model of neuropathic pain exhibits pain recovery.

•

Thermal hyperalgesia and dynamic weight bearing display similar pain recovery profiles, whereas mechanical allodynia persists.

•

Dynamic weight bearing is a non-reflexive, pain assessment of ongoing pain during nerve entrapment.

Chronic constriction injuries (CCI) of the sciatic nerve are widely used nerve entrapment animal models of neuropathic pain. Two common pain behaviors observed following CCI are thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia, measured by the Hargreaves and von Frey tests, respectively. While thermal hyperalgesia tends to recover by 30 days, mechanical allodynia can persist for many more months thereafter. Consequently, mechanical allodynia has been used extensively as a measure of ‘chronic pain’ focusing on the circuitry changes that occur within the spinal cord. Here, using the sciatic nerve cuff variant of CCI in mice, we propose that in contrast to these evoked measures of nociceptive hypersensitivity, dynamic weight bearing provides a more clinically relevant behavioral measure for ongoing pain during nerve injury. We found that the effect of sciatic nerve cuff on the ratio of weight bearing by the injured relative to uninjured hindlimbs more closely resembled that of thermal hyperalgesia, following a trend toward recovery by 30 days. We also found an increase in the percent of body weight bearing by the contralateral paw that is not seen in the previously tested behaviors. These results demonstrate that dynamic weight bearing is a reliable measure of non-evoked neuropathic pain and suggest that thermal hyperalgesia, rather than mechanical allodynia, provides a proxy measure for nerve entrapment-induced ongoing pain.

Advances in the treatment of neuropathic pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuropathic pain remains difficult to treat. This review provides an update regarding recent advances in therapeutic management, particularly with regards to newer drugs, neurostimulation techniques and original study designs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the mainstay of neuropathic pain management is still represented by drug therapy, particularly antidepressants and antiepileptics, the place of nonpharmacological therapy including in particular brain neuromodulation techniques has substantially increased in recent years. Newer study designs are also increasingly implemented, based on in depth phenotypic profiling to achieve more individualized therapy, or on screening strategies to decrease placebo effect and contribute to increase assay sensitivity. These approaches are now considered the most promising to decrease therapeutic failures in neuropathic pain.

SUMMARY

Neuropathic pain management should not be restricted to pharmacotherapy but now encompasses multiple approaches including particularly neuromodulation techniques. Multimodal assessment can also help identify predictors of the response in clinical trials in order to ensure appropriate management.

Safety and efficacy of an equimolar mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide: a randomized controlled trial in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain

ABSTRACT

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an odorless and colorless gas routinely used as an adjuvant of anesthesia and for short-duration analgesia in various clinical settings mostly in the form of an N2O/O2 50%-50% equimolar mixture (EMONO). Experimental studies have suggested that EMONO could also induce long-lasting analgesic effects related to the blockade of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. We designed the first international multicenter proof of concept randomized, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of a 1-hour administration of EMONO or placebo (medical air) on 3 consecutive days up to 1 month after the last administration in patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain. A total of 240 patients were recruited in 22 centers in France and Germany and randomly assigned to 1 study group (120 per group). Average pain intensity (primary outcome), neuropathic pain characteristics (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory), Patient Global Impression of Change, anxiety, depression, and quality of life were systematically assessed before and after treatment. The changes in average pain intensity between baseline and 7 days after the last administration were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, evoked pain intensity (predefined secondary endpoint) and Patient Global Impression of Change (exploratory endpoint) were significantly improved in the EMONO group, and these effects were maintained up to 4 weeks after the last treatment administration. Mostly transient side effects were reported during the treatment administration. These encouraging results provide a basis for further investigation of the long-term analgesic effects of EMONO in patients with neuropathic pain.

Nociceptor-localized cGMP-dependent protein kinase I is a critical generator for central sensitization and neuropathic pain

Patients with neuropathic pain often experience exaggerated pain and anxiety. Central sensitization has been linked with the maintenance of neuropathic pain and may become an autonomous pain generator. Conversely, emerging evidence accumulated that central sensitization is initiated and maintained by ongoing nociceptive primary afferent inputs. However, it remains elusive what mechanisms underlie this phenomenon and which peripheral candidate contributes to central sensitization that accounts for pain hypersensitivity and pain-related anxiety. Previous studies have implicated peripherally localized cGMP-dependent protein kinase I (PKG-I) in plasticity of nociceptors and spinal synaptic transmission as well as inflammatory hyperalgesia. However, whether peripheral PKG-I contributes to cortical plasticity and hence maintains nerve injury-induced pain hypersensitivity and anxiety is unknown. Here, we demonstrated significant upregulation of PKG-I in ipsilateral L3 dorsal root ganglia (DRG), no change in L4 DRG, and downregulation in L5 DRG upon spared nerve injury. Genetic ablation of PKG-I specifically in nociceptors or post-treatment with intervertebral foramen injection of PKG-I antagonist, KT5823, attenuated the development and maintenance of spared nerve injury-induced bilateral pain hypersensitivity and anxiety. Mechanistic analysis revealed that activation of PKG-I in nociceptors is responsible for synaptic potentiation in the anterior cingulate cortex upon peripheral neuropathy through presynaptic mechanisms involving brain-derived neurotropic factor signaling. Our results revealed that PKG-I expressed in nociceptors is a key determinant for cingulate synaptic plasticity after nerve injury, which contributes to the maintenance of pain hypersensitivity and anxiety. Thereby, this study presents a strong basis for opening up a novel therapeutic target, PKG-I, in nociceptors for treatment of comorbidity of neuropathic pain and anxiety with least side effects.

Pharmacotherapeutic Options for Managing Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite an increasing number of available therapies, the treatment of neuropathic pain remains a major issue. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that only a minority of patients with neuropathic pain have an adequate response to pharmacological treatment and that most drugs have dose-limiting side effects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials published in the last five years. We searched for relevant papers within PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Clinical Trials database (ClinicalTrials.gov). Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, data extraction, and bias assessment. We identified 39 randomised controlled trials and included 16 in the meta-analysis. Trial outcomes were generally modest even for first-line drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, and gabapentinoids. Many drugs acting on new pain targets are currently under development. Clinical data are currently available for sodium channel isoform-specific antagonists, anti-nerve growth factor molecules, and fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitors.

Comprehensive Review of Topical Analgesics for Chronic Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Topical analgesics are a non-opioid option for the treatment of chronic pain conditions including neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal pain, and osteoarthritis. There are many topical medications available; however their efficacy is variable. This article reviews the various topical analgesics, their mechanisms of action, and their efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have found topical NSAIDs are useful in treating acute musculoskeletal pain syndromes (strains and sprains) and show some efficacy in treating hand and knee osteoarthritis (Derry et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD008609, 2017). Topical capsaicin 8% has been shown to be efficacious in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and HIV-neuropathy (Derry et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD007393, 2017). Topical lidocaine has been widely studied and found to reduce pain in patients with postherpetic neuralgia (Knezevic et al. Pain Manag 7:537-58, 2017). Although many other topical analgesics are available, there is limited data to support the efficacy of other agents. Topical analgesics are a relatively benign treatment for chronic pain conditions including neuropathic pain, musculoskeletal, and myofascial pain. There is evidence to support the use of topical NSAIDs, high concentration topical capsaicin, and topical lidocaine for various painful conditions.

Tweety-Homolog 1 Facilitates Pain via Enhancement of Nociceptor Excitability and Spinal Synaptic Transmission

Tweety-homolog 1 (Ttyh1) is expressed in neural tissue and has been implicated in the generation of several brain diseases. However, its functional significance in pain processing is not understood. By disrupting the gene encoding Ttyh1, we found a loss of Ttyh1 in nociceptors and their central terminals in Ttyh1-deficient mice, along with a reduction in nociceptor excitability and synaptic transmission at identified synapses between nociceptors and spinal neurons projecting to the periaqueductal grey (PAG) in the basal state. More importantly, the peripheral inflammation-evoked nociceptor hyperexcitability and spinal synaptic potentiation recorded in spinal-PAG projection neurons were compromised in Ttyh1-deficient mice. Analysis of the paired-pulse ratio and miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents indicated a role of presynaptic Ttyh1 from spinal nociceptor terminals in the regulation of neurotransmitter release. Interfering with Ttyh1 specifically in nociceptors produces a comparable pain relief. Thus, in this study we demonstrated that Ttyh1 is a critical determinant of acute nociception and pain sensitization caused by peripheral inflammation.

Traitements pharmacologiques et non pharmacologiques de la douleur neuropathique : une synthèse des recommandations françaises

Les douleurs neuropathiques (DN) restent très difficiles à soulager. Plusieurs recommandations ont été proposées au cours de ces dernières années, mais aucune n’a pris en compte à ce jour l’ensemble des approches thérapeutiques disponibles. Nous avons réalisé une revue systématique portant sur toutes les études concernant le traitement des DN périphériques et centrales de l’adulte et de l’enfant, publiées jusqu’en janvier 2018 et avons évalué la qualité des études et le niveau de preuve des traitements au moyen du système GRADE. Les principaux critères d’inclusion étaient l’existence d’une DN chronique (≥ 3 mois), une méthodologie contrôlée et randomisée, un suivi supérieur ou égal à trois semaines, un nombre de patients supérieur ou égal à dix par groupe et une évaluation en double insu pour les traitements pharmacologiques. Sur la base du GRADE, nous recommandons en première intention les antidépresseurs inhibiteurs mixtes de recapture des monoamines (duloxétine et venlafaxine), les antidépresseurs tricycliques, la gabapentine pour toute DN, et les emplâtres de lidocaïne 5 % et la stimulation électrique transcutanée pour les DN périphériques localisées. Nous recommandons en deuxième intention la prégabaline, le tramadol (avec les précautions d’emploi afférentes aux opioïdes) et certaines associations pharmacologiques (antidépresseurs et gabapentine ou prégabaline) pour toute DN, et les patchs de haute concentration de capsaïcine (8 %) et la toxine botulique de type A (en milieu spécialisé) pour les DN périphériques localisées. Nous recommandons en troisième intention la stimulation magnétique transcrânienne répétitive à haute fréquence du cortex moteur (en milieu spécialisé) et les opioïdes forts (en l’absence d’alternative et en respectant les précautions d’emploi afférentes aux opioïdes) pour toute douleur neuropathique, et la stimulation médullaire pour les douleurs radiculaires chroniques postchirurgicales et la polyneuropathie diabétique douloureuse. La psychothérapie (thérapie cognitivocomportementale et thérapie de pleine conscience) peut être recommandée en deuxième intention en association avec les traitements précédents.

Topical Treatment of Localized Neuropathic Pain in the Elderly

The prevalence of neuropathic pain in the older population has been reported to be very high and is most commonly localized to a circumscribed area. Treatment failure is frequent in neuropathic pain and is accompanied by central side effects with recommended oral drugs acting on the central nervous system. A number of topical pharmaceuticals are available on prescription and also sold over the counter. This review in persons aged older than 60 years shows the efficacy of lidocaine 5% and capsaicin 8% for localized neuropathic pain while results with other pharmaceuticals are rather inconsistent. Local application of drugs has a very limited systemic effect and the pharmacological advantages of local over systemic treatment are particularly interesting in older persons who often have comorbidities and take multiple medications. However, more information is needed on the efficacy and safety of lidocaine 5% and capsaicin 8% in older old persons and on the long-term effects of these pharmaceuticals. These studies should also pave the way for research and development in the field of topical analgesics with a satisfactory level of evidence-based medicine.

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: Systematic review and French recommendations

Neuropathic pain remains a significant unmet medical need. Several recommendations have recently been proposed concerning pharmacotherapy, neurostimulation techniques and interventional management, but no comprehensive guideline encompassing all these treatments has yet been issued. We performed a systematic review of pharmacotherapy, neurostimulation, surgery, psychotherapies and other types of therapy for peripheral or central neuropathic pain, based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals before January 2018. The main inclusion criteria were chronic neuropathic pain for at least three months, a randomized controlled methodology, at least three weeks of follow-up, at least 10 patients per group, and a double-blind design for drug therapy. Based on the GRADE system, we provide weak-to-strong recommendations for use and proposal as a first-line treatment for SNRIs (duloxetine and venlafaxine), gabapentin and tricyclic antidepressants and, for topical lidocaine and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation specifically for peripheral neuropathic pain; a weak recommendation for use and proposal as a second-line treatment for pregabalin, tramadol, combination therapy (antidepressant combined with gabapentinoids), and for high-concentration capsaicin patches and botulinum toxin A specifically for peripheral neuropathic pain; a weak recommendation for use and proposal as a third-line treatment for high-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex, spinal cord stimulation (failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic polyneuropathy) and strong opioids (in the absence of an alternative). Psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness) is recommended as a second-line therapy, as an add-on to other therapies. An algorithm encompassing all the recommended treatments is proposed.