Quantitative sensory testing and predicting outcomes for musculoskeletal pain, disability, and negative affect: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Central aspects of pain associated with physical activity: results from the Investigating Musculoskeletal Health and Wellbeing cohort

Background

Knee pain reduces activity, while inactivity can increase pain. The central nervous system modulates both pain and activity. The 8-item Central Aspects of Pain (CAP) questionnaire measures self-reported symptoms associated with current and future knee pain severity and psychophysical evidence of central pain sensitivity. The objective was to explore associations between CAP and physical inactivity in people with knee pain.

Methods

Participants from the Investigating Musculoskeletal Health and Wellbeing cohort who reported their knee as their most troublesome joint with numerical rating scale pain severity ≥1/10 completed questionnaires at baseline and 12 months addressing demographic and clinical characteristics, CAP questionnaire, and physical inactivity (Frail Non-Disabled questionnaire item). Chi-squared, correlations and multivariable logistic regression were performed.

Results

Seven hundred twenty-two participants provided baseline data and 404 longitudinal data. Higher baseline CAP scores were associated with higher baseline pain severity {OR: 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.53); P = 0.032} and physical inactivity (OR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.11-1.25]; P < 0.001). Increasing CAP scores over 12 months were associated with becoming physically inactive (OR: 1.16 [95% CI: 1.01-1.32]; P = 0.032). The effects of CAP on physical inactivity were not fully explained by pain severity nor by any single characteristic of widespread pain distribution, emotional or cognitive factors, sleep disturbance, or fatigue.

Conclusion

Central aspects of pain questionnaire displays cross-sectional and longitudinal associations with physical inactivity. Central nervous system manifestations of pain appear to link pain with physical activity and may be more important than pain severity.

Comparative Effectiveness of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain, Fatigue, and Sleep Quality in Fibromyalgia. A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

There is tentative evidence to support the analgesic effects of noninvasive brain stimulation (NiBS) in fibromyalgia (FM), but a comprehensive synthesis is lacking. This systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to determine the relative effectiveness of different NiBS techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in FM, and to identify the optimal stimulation location and intensity/frequency.

METHODS

Four databases were searched until July 9, 2023 for randomized trials (RCTs) comparing NiBS in FM. Pain was the primary outcome, while fatigue and sleep were secondary outcomes. A frequentist NMA calculated standardized-mean-differences (SMDs) for pain, with pairwise meta-analysis for fatigue and sleep. Bias was assessed with the Cochrane-risk-of-bias-tool (RoB-2.0), and evidence certainty through confidence-in-NMA.

RESULTS

Forty-three RCTs with 2120 participants were included. NMA showed that low frequency (LF)-rTMS (SMD: -1.20, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.58), dual tDCS (SMD: -0.91, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.58), and high frequency (HF)-rTMS (SMD: -0.58, 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.17) likely results in a reduction in pain intensity at the end of intervention compared with sham stimulation. For stimulation location, right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)(SMD: -1.42, 95% CI: -2.69 to -0.15), bilateral DLPFC (SMD: -0.94, 95% CI: -1.82 to -0.05), and left primary motor cortex (M1)(SMD: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.85 to -0.14) likely results in reduction in pain intensity at the end of intervention, with DLPFC maintaining effects in short-term. LF-rTMS over DLPFC (SMD: -1.42, 95% CI: -2.69 to -0.15) and HF-rTMS over M1 (SMD: -0.78, 95% CI: -1.39 to -0.18) likely results in the reduction in pain intensity at the end of intervention, with LF-rTMS over right DLPFC maintaining effects in the short term. NiBS appears to be safe and may reduce fatigue and improve sleep quality.

DISCUSSION

Excitatory stimulation like HF-rTMS over M1 and inhibitory like LF-rTMS over DLPFC may yield better results.

Can quantitative sensory testing predict treatment outcomes in hip and knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data

ABSTRACT

An individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis can assess the predictive value of data on outcomes at the individual level, offering a potential tool for developing personalized pain management. Pretreatment quantitative sensory testing (QST) may stratify patient groups, which are then linked to treatment outcomes. Our objective was to determine if measures of QST at baseline are related to treatment outcomes (at any time point) for pain and disability in lower-limb osteoarthritis. We performed a systematic review with an IPD meta-analysis. Searches were conducted in 9 databases until May 5, 2023 for intervention studies that measured baseline QST and longitudinal measures of participant-reported pain and disability. We performed a 2-stage approach to analyse longitudinal data. Individual models were fitted to each study and combined using random effects multivariate meta-analytic models. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. We identified 3082 records and included 1 hip and 28 knee datasets consisting of 2522 participants from 40 studies. Local warm detection thresholds (P = 0.024) predicted knee osteoarthritis pain outcomes (very-low certainty). Local warm detection thresholds (P = 0.030), remote cold detection thresholds (P = 0.05), and remote pressure tolerance thresholds (P = 0.007) predicted knee osteoarthritis disability outcomes (very-low certainty). Other QST variables were associated with hip and knee osteoarthritis pain and disability levels (eg, pressure pain thresholds), but this relationship did not change over time. This review finds that mechanism-based, QST methodologies do not consistently predict pain or disability on an individual level in hip or knee osteoarthritis.

Quantitative Sensory Testing in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Scoping Review

Background/Objectives: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is one of the most reliable methods for assessing Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS). Despite its importance, there are still controversies regarding the correct interpretation of evoked responses, as they may vary depending on the protocol, individual characteristics, disease severity, and other factors. This study aims to examine how QST has been applied as an outcome measure in FMS. Methods: We considered three databases (Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) until June 2024. From a total of 2512 studies, 126 (39 RCTs and 87 non-RCTs) were selected for full reading after assessment for risk of bias and eligibility criteria. These criteria included at least one type of QST and a clear diagnosis of fibromyalgia (FMS). Results: The results highlighted a lack of standardization in QST, as no reported protocols were followed and there was no specific number of tender points tested for FMS. Additionally, there was inconsistency in the selection of sites and types of tests conducted. Conclusions: This heterogeneity in methodology may affect the comparability and interpretation of results, underscoring the urgent need for standardized guidelines for conducting QST in fibromyalgia studies. A clear understanding of how QST has been measured could prompt a reevaluation of current approaches to FMS assessment, leading to more accurate interpretations and, ultimately, improved management of this complex condition.

Inflammatory reactivity is unrelated to childhood adversity or provoked modulation of nociception

Adversity in childhood elevates the risk of persistent pain in adulthood. Neuroimmune interactions are a candidate mechanistic link between childhood adversity and persistent pain. We aimed to clarify whether immune reactivity is associated with provoked differences in nociceptive processing in adults with a range of childhood adversity. Pain-free adults (n=96; 61 female; median (range) age: 23 (18-65) years old) with a history of mild to severe childhood adversity underwent psychophysical assessments before and after in vivo neural provocation (high-frequency electrical stimulation) and, separately, before and after in vivo immune provocation (influenza vaccine administration). Psychophysical assessments included the surface area of secondary hyperalgesia after neural provocation and change in conditioned pain modulation (test stimulus: pressure pain threshold; conditioning stimulus: cold water immersion) after immune provocation. Immune reactivity was operationalised as IL-6 and TNF-α expression after in vitro lipopolysaccharide provocation of whole blood. We hypothesised associations between immune reactivity and (1) childhood adversity, (2) induced secondary hyperalgesia, and (3) vaccine-associated change in conditioned pain modulation. We found that provoked expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines was not statistically associated with childhood adversity, induced secondary hyperalgesia, or vaccine-associated change in conditioned pain modulation. The current findings from a heterogenous sample cast doubt on two prominent ideas: that childhood adversity primes the inflammatory system for hyper-responsiveness in adulthood and that nociceptive reactivity is linked to inflammatory reactivity. This calls for the broader inclusion of heterogeneous samples in fundamental research to investigate the psychoneuroimmunological mechanisms underlying vulnerability to persistent pain.

Limited association between central pain processing and clinical outcomes in non-specific chronic neck pain after a manual therapy intervention: A secondary analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP) is a prevalent condition causing significant disability. While manual therapy is recommended, its clinical benefits are limited. The relationship between central pain processing and treatment outcomes in NSCNP remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether central pain processing measures could predict manual therapy outcomes in NSCNP patients.

DESIGN

Pre-planned secondary analysis.

METHODS

Sixty-three NSCNP patients underwent a four-week manual therapy regimen. Central pain processing mechanisms were assessed using Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Temporal Summation of Pain (TSP), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM). Clinical outcomes were measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), pain intensity, and the Global Rating of Change Scale (GRoC). Univariate and multivariate regression models explored associations between baseline variables and treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis identified baseline CPM and neck pain duration as significant predictors of treatment outcome based on GRoC. A weak negative association was found between CPM and GRoC (p < 0.05), suggesting that patients with lower CPM response reported better perceived outcomes. Baseline NDI was inversely associated with changes in disability (p < 0.01). Baseline pain intensity (p < 0.01) and duration (p < 0.05) were inversely related to pain reduction, while baseline CPM narrowly missed significance. No significant associations were found between TSP, PPT, and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest a limited association between pre-treatment central pain processing status and manual therapy outcomes in NSCNP patients. The lower CPM response was modestly predictive of better outcomes, contrary to expectations. Routine use of QST measures to guide treatment decisions in this population is not supported by current data.

Differential pain perception among females with or without nonspecific chronic low back pain and comorbid insomnia: a quantitative sensory testing analysis

ABSTRACT

Sleep disturbance is a prevalent condition in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Despite a strong association between the 2 conditions, the potential mechanisms underlying the role of sleep disturbance in CLBP remain unclear. This case-control study aimed to examine pain perception among females with or without nonspecific CLBP and comorbid insomnia. One hundred females were recruited (mean age: 34.3 ± 11.4 years), with 25 individuals with concomitant CLBP and insomnia (CLBP+I), 25 with CLBP (CLBP+), 25 with insomnia (Insomnia+), and 25 healthy controls. All participants completed self-report questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing (QST). Our study found that CLBP+I exhibited lower mechanical pain and pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in both painful and nonpainful areas and impaired conditioned pain modulation (CPM) as compared to healthy controls. Similar findings were found in PPT at the back and CPM when compared to CLBP+. However, no significant differences were noted in thermal pain thresholds and temporal summation of pain across the 4 groups. Furthermore, CLBP+I and Insomnia+ displayed higher levels of functional disability, maladaptive beliefs, and negative mood than CLBP+ or healthy controls. There were significant increases in pain sensitivity to pressure stimuli, decreases in descending pain inhibitory effects, and higher levels of maladaptive psychological status in CLBP+I compared to CLBP+. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating sleep assessments as a routine practice in treating CLBP cases. Future studies are warranted to validate our findings in males, establish the diagnostic and prognostic value of QST, and probe the neurophysiological mechanisms in comorbid conditions.

Pain-Related White-Matter Changes Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Diffusion Tensor Imaging Pilot Study

Background: This study used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to detect brain microstructural changes in participants with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who experienced post-traumatic headaches, a common issue that affects quality of life and rehabilitation. Despite its prevalence, the mechanisms behind post-traumatic headache are not well understood. Methods: Participants were recruited from Level 1 trauma centers, and MRI scans, including T1-weighted anatomical imaging and DTI, were acquired 1 month post-injury. Advanced imaging techniques corrected artifacts and extracted diffusion tensor measures reflecting white-matter integrity. Pain sensitivity assays were collected at 1 and 6 months post-injury, including quantitative sensory testing and psychological assessments. Results: Significant aberrations in axial diffusivity in the forceps major were observed in mTBI participants (n = 12) compared to healthy controls (n = 10) 1 month post-injury (p = 0.02). Within the mTBI group, DTI metrics at 1 month were significantly associated with pain-related and psychological outcomes at 6 months. Statistical models revealed group differences in the right sagittal stratum (p < 0.01), left insula (p < 0.04), and left superior longitudinal fasciculus (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study shows that DTI metrics at 1 month post-injury are sensitive to mTBI and predictive of chronic pain and psychological outcomes at 6 months.

A novel hybrid deep learning framework based on biplanar X-ray radiography images for bone density prediction and classification

This study utilized deep learning for bone mineral density (BMD) prediction and classification using biplanar X-ray radiography (BPX) images from Huashan Hospital Medical Checkup Center. Results showed high accuracy and strong correlation with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) results. The proposed models offer potential for screening patients at a high risk of osteoporosis and reducing unnecessary radiation and costs.

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of using a hybrid deep learning framework (HDLF) to establish a model for BMD prediction and classification based on BPX images. This study aimed to establish an automated tool for screening patients at a high risk of osteoporosis.

METHODS

A total of 906 BPX scans from 453 subjects were included in this study, with QCT results serving as the reference standard. The training-validation set:independent test set ratio was 4:1. The L1-L3 vertebral bodies were manually annotated by experienced radiologists, and the HDLF was established to predict BMD and diagnose abnormality based on BPX images and clinical information. The performance metrics of the models were calculated and evaluated.

RESULTS

TheR 2 values of the BMD prediction regression model in the independent test set based on BPX images and multimodal data (BPX images and clinical information) were 0.77 and 0.79, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, with P-values < 0.001. Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant difference between the predictions of the models and QCT results. The classification model achieved the highest AUC of 0.97 based on multimodal data in the independent test set, with an accuracy of 0.93, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.96, and F1 score of 0.93.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that deep learning neural networks applied to BPX images can accurately predict BMD and perform classification diagnoses, which can reduce the radiation risk, economic consumption, and time consumption associated with specialized BMD measurement.

The rat osteoarthritis bone score for histological pathology relevant to human bone marrow lesions and pain

Objectives

Histological osteochondral characteristics of inflammation, fibrosis, vascularity, cartilage islands, vessels entering cartilage, thickened trabeculae and cysts are associated with bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in human knee osteoarthritis (OA). We identified and developed a method for scoring comparable pathology in two rat OA knee pain models.

Methods

Rats (n ​= ​8-10 per group) were injected with monoiodoacetate (MIA) or saline, or underwent meniscal transection (MNX) or sham surgery. Pain behaviour (weight bearing asymmetry and mechanical hindpaw withdrawal thresholds (PWTs)) were measured and knee samples obtained. Features associated with BMLs were evaluated using haematoxylin and eosin or Safranin-O stained knee sections. Sections were scored for chondropathy, osteophytes, synovitis and with the human OA Bone Score modified for rats (rOABS). rOABS reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U-tests, and associations examined with Spearman's rho.

Results

OABS features were more prevalent in each OA pain group than in controls. rOABS displayed good inter-rater reliability (ICC ​= ​0.79). rOABS was higher in each model than controls; MIA 3.0 (2.3-4.0) vs vehicle 0.0 (0.0-0.0), and MNX 4.0 (2.3-4.8) vs sham 0.0 (0.0-0.0), each p ​< ​0.003. rOABS was associated with OA cartilage involvement (rho ​= ​0.69, p ​< ​0.001), osteophyte (rho ​= ​0.61, p ​< ​0.001) and synovial inflammation (rho ​= ​0.76, p ​< ​0.001). Higher rOABS was associated with pain behaviour: weight bearing asymmetry (rho ​= ​0.65, p ​< ​0.001) and PWT (rho ​= ​-0.47, p ​= ​0.003).

Conclusions

Subchondral pathology in rat OA models resembles human subchondral BMLs. rOABS reliably measured subchondral pathology and was associated with OA structure and pain behaviour.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial Protocol for Therapeutic Neuroscience Education in Chronic Migraine Patients: A Clinical-Neurophysiological Combined Study Design

Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly disabling condition, affecting about 2% of the global population. Non-pharmacological treatments can be optimal for their non-invasive nature. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial aimed to test the efficacy of therapeutic neuroscience education (TNE) in CM. Early response biomarkers were also evaluated. A total of 80 CM patients were consecutively enrolled and randomly allocated to TNE or a general education program. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated at baseline (T1) and 2 months after the end of treatment (T4). We collected the responses to disability and comorbidity questionnaires at the start (T1) and end of treatment (T3, 10 weeks after start). Early response biomarkers were evaluated at screening (T0) and mid-way through the process (T2, 5 weeks after start). We expected that TNE would provide a greater benefit than the general education program, which served as the primary outcome of this study. We also expected that a change in clinical and neurophysiological measures could potentially occur, reflecting plasticity-induced reorganization and predicting clinical response. This is the first study selectively exploring the effect of TNE as a standalone treatment for CM. A new, effective treatment regime without interactions with other medication could be of great interest as an addition to migraine therapeutic strategies.

Soft Nanomembrane Sensor-Enabled Wearable Multimodal Sensing and Feedback System for Upper-Limb Sensory Impairment Assistance

Sensory rehabilitation in pediatric patients with traumatic spinal cord injury is challenging due to the ongoing development of their nervous systems. However, these sensory problems often result in nonuse of the impaired limb, which disturbs impaired limb rehabilitation and leads to overuse of the contralateral limb and other physical or psychological issues that may persist. Here, we introduce a soft nanomembrane sensor-enabled wearable glove system that wirelessly delivers a haptic sensation from the hand with tactile feedback responses for sensory impairment assistance. The smart glove system uses gold nanomembranes, copper-elastomer composites, and laser-induced graphene for the sensitive detection of pressure, temperature, and strain changes. The nanomaterial sensors are integrated with low-profile tactile actuators and wireless flexible electronics to offer real-time sensory feedback. The wearable system's thin-film sensors demonstrate 98% and 97% accuracy in detecting pressure and finger flexion, respectively, along with a detection coverage of real-life temperature changes as an effective rehabilitation tool. Collectively, the upper-limb sensory impairment assistance system embodies the latest in soft materials and wearable technology to incorporate soft sensors and miniaturized actuators and maximize its compatibility with human users, offering a promising solution for patient sensory rehabilitation.

Early CRPS Is a Heterogeneous Condition: Results From a Latent Class Analysis

BACKGROUND

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a debilitating condition characterised by significant heterogeneity. Early diagnosis is critical, but limited data exists on the condition's early stages. This study aimed to characterise (very) early CRPS patients and explore potential subgroups to enhance understanding of its mechanisms.

METHODS

A total of 113 early CRPS patients were recruited, with 89 undergoing physical assessments. Data included demographic information, work-related factors, CRPS history and clinical features, body perception disturbances, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and a visuospatial attention task.

RESULTS

QST identified deficits in detecting thermal and mechanical stimuli, alongside increased sensitivity to thermal and blunt pressure painful stimuli. Participants reported body perception disturbances similar to those of persistent CRPS. Visuospatial biases were observed in two subgroups of patients. Latent class analysis (LCA) of 85 participants, based on five clinical parameters, identified four profiles: Mild, Moderate, Body Representation Disturbance (BRD), and Pressure Allodynia CRPS. The Mild and Moderate profiles were associated with higher-intensity trauma, with the latter showing worse outcomes. BRD and Pressure Allodynia CRPS followed mild trauma but exhibited the poorest outcomes. BRD CRPS displayed significant body perception disturbances, while Pressure Allodynia CRPS presented the highest sensitivity to pressure and psychosocial risk of chronification. Neither condition duration nor skin temperature effectively distinguished subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasise the heterogeneity within (very) early CRPS patients and support the absence of a minimum required duration prior to the CRPS diagnosis. Central/systemic mechanisms may play critical roles in severe cases.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study identifies distinct (very) early CRPS profiles, suggesting different pathophysiological mechanisms and challenging traditional classifications. It paves the way for improved diagnosis and tailored treatments.

ADvAnced PhysioTherapy in MuSculosKeletal Triage: Investigating prognostic factors, healthcare utilisation and clinical outcomes (ADAPT MSK) - a cohort study protocol

Background

Clinical specialist physiotherapist-led musculoskeletal triage clinics were introduced nationally in Ireland in 2011 to improve patient care and reduce waiting times for secondary care orthopaedics and rheumatology. Evidence has shown them to be effective in reducing waiting lists, however there are currently no data on longitudinal patient outcomes following attendance at these clinics. The primary aim of this prospective, cohort study is to identify predictors of clinical outcome (pain and function) at 12-months post MSK-triage appointment. Secondary aims are to describe the clinical course of patients attending MSK triage clinics and measure self-reported use of healthcare resources up to 12 months post-MSK-triage appointment. This is a prospective cohort study.

Methods

ADvAnced PhysioTherapy in MuSculosKeletal Triage (ADAPT MSK) will recruit a cohort of 252 adults through musculoskeletal triage clinics across five secondary care sites in Ireland. The STrengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines will be adhered to for future reporting. Adults (≥ 18 years old) attending physiotherapist-led musculoskeletal triage clinics with musculoskeletal pain, who do not require surgical or consultant-led medical care will be considered for participation in this study. Participant demographics, health literacy, healthcare utilisation, and self-report questionnaires on pain, function, musculoskeletal health status, musculoskeletal risk stratification, fear of movement, and psychological distress will be obtained at baseline, with follow-ups at three, six, and 12 months. The primary outcomes are pain intensity and function. Secondary outcomes include musculoskeletal risk stratification status, musculoskeletal health status, healthcare utilisation, and work status. Descriptive statistics will be used to profile the cohort of participants and predictors of outcome will be assessed using multivariable linear regression.

Results

Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journal publication and presentation at national and international conferences. Engagement with a public patient involvement (PPI) panel will explore dissemination strategies for public and service user engagement.

Pain sensitization in fibromyalgia. Cross-sectional associations between quantitative sensory testing of pain sensitization and fibromyalgia disease burden

BACKGROUND

Whether fibromyalgia burden is related to measures of sensitization, assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST), is not clear. We examine the associations between sensitization and fibromyalgia disease burden as measured by the polysymptomatic sistress scale (PDS) and the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ) (range 0-100).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were recruited from referrals to a rheumatology outpatient clinic and the fibromyalgia diagnosis was verified by a rheumatologist. They completed the PDS and FIQ and underwent QST of pressure pain threshold (PPT) at five sites, temporal summation (TS), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) estimated as post-stimuli/pre-stimuli PPT. The associations between QST and disease burden were analysed in linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index.

RESULTS

A total of 78 individuals with clinically verified fibromyalgia (90% women, mean age 40.9 years (SD 7.3)) were recruited. Overall mean PPT was associated with the FIQ total score (β-2.1, 95% CI-4.3, -0.0) and the function component (β-2.1, (-4.3, -0.0)). When examining the associations between PPT at individual sites and fibromyalgia disease severity, PPTs at the distal interphalangeal joint and tibialis anterior muscle were associated with both FIQ total score and the FIQ fatigue component. All associations were weak and insignificant after Bonferroni corrections.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of individuals with fibromyalgia, sensitization was not significantly associated with self-reported disease burden. Our results point to the multifactorial nature of fibromyalgia disease severity.

SIGNIFICANCE

In patients with fibromyalgia, commonly used measures of sensitization do not explain the symptom burden or the functional impact.

The role of environmental sensitivity, traumatic experiences, defense mechanisms and mental pain on central sensitivity: testing a path analysis model in chronic headache on quality of life

Central pain sensitivity (CS) is defined as an increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to normal or subthreshold inputs. The main aim of this paper is to investigate if and how specific psychological constructs are related with CS burden in patients with chronic headache (CH). Specifically, research question 1 explores the association of temperament, personality, childhood adversities, defense mechanisms and mental pain with CS burden. Research question 2 aims to test the role of the best predictors of CS burden in affecting the quality of life (QoL) using path analysis. A total of 508 women with CH completed a psycho-diagnostic survey. Results showed that higher levels of low sensory threshold (β = 0.200), bodily threat traumatic experiences (β = 0.156), neurotic defenses (β = 0.109) and mental pain (β = 0.343) emerged as the best predictors of higher CS burden. The model presented demonstrated a satisfactory fit (GFI = 0.984; NFI = 0.966; CFI = 0.979; RMSEA = 0.056 [95% CI 0.028-0.085]) with large and medium effect sizes on physical (-0.654) and psychological QoL (-0.246). The study showed a key role of psychological dimensions in CS burden levels and their relationships with QoL in CH patients. From a clinical perspective, these results suggest the importance of evaluating the level of CS burden during the clinical assessment for chronic pain conditions such as CH, since it may contribute to guide patients to tailored psychological and medical treatments, thereby saving time and costs on diagnostic procedures for chronic pain.

Developing Consensus for an Upper and Lower Limb Athlete Pain Assessment Framework - A Real-Time Delphi Study With International Sports Physiotherapists

OBJECTIVE: We sought to develop recommendations to inform a framework for comprehensively assessing upper and lower limb pain in athletes including the key assessment items sports physiotherapists should consider. DESIGN: Real-time Delphi. METHODS: We recruited sports physiotherapists who were currently working with athletes through the International Federation of Sports Physical Therapists and Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists. Participants voted on 86 pain assessment items chosen using best available evidence. The real-time Delphi method facilitated independent anonymous voting, commenting, and immediate review of consensus. Participants indicated level of agreement for inclusion in an upper and lower limb athlete pain assessment framework on a 6-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree, and how often they are/will be required in practice on a 5-point scale from never to always. Criteria for consensus agreement and inclusion were (1) >70% sports physiotherapists voting agree/strongly agree AND (2) median vote selected by physiotherapists was agree or strongly agree. RESULTS: Forty-one sports physiotherapists (female, n = 20; male, n = 21), visited the survey an average of 5.3 times (±5), resulting in a completion rate of 98%. Sixty-four assessment items (neurophysiological, n = 20; biomechanical, n = 15; affective, n = 8; cognitive, n = 3; socioenvironmental, n = 10; general assessment aspects of assessment, n = 8) met the criteria for consensus. Frequency of use in practice was always for 28 items often for 32 items and sometimes for 4 items. CONCLUSION: We have presented stakeholder-generated recommendations and priorities for assessing athletes' pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(1):1-11. Epub 22 November 2024. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2024.12807.

Acute and long-term effect of specific and non-specific exercises in patients with chronic neck pain: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Exercise therapy is the most common approach for people with chronic neck pain (CNP). Although well-established, it remains unknown which type of exercise is the best for treating this condition. Moreover, pain processing can play a role in the persistence of pain and in the response to interventions. Thus, the aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the acute and long-term effects of two exercise protocols (specific and non-specific) on pain and pain processing in individuals with CNP. One hundred and ten participants aged between 18 and 65 years who have had non-specific neck pain for more than 3 months will be recruited. They will be randomized and allocated into two groups (specific exercises and non-specific exercises) and both groups will perform an exercise programme twice a week for 8 weeks. Both programmes are divided into two progressive and individualized phases. The primary outcomes are change in pain intensity after 8 weeks of exercise and exercise-induced hypoalgesia, and secondary outcomes are pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, conditioned pain modulation, the Neck Disability Index, the Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire, and the Global Perception of Change Scale. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after 8 weeks of intervention, and at 6-month follow-up.

Complex intervention including pain science education and patient-led goal setting-based self-management strategies for management of aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms: a single-arm feasibility and pilot study

PURPOSE

Up to 74% of breast cancer survivors (BCS) treated with aromatase inhibitor (AI) experience AI-induced musculoskeletal symptoms (AIMSS). AIMSS is the predominant cause of poor adherence to AI therapy, yet no definitive treatment exists. The primary research objectives of this study were (1) to develop a novel BCS-specific complex intervention to alleviate AIMSS, and to assess its feasibility. The secondary research objective was (2) to assess the preliminary efficacy of this intervention.

METHODS

A single-arm, longitudinal pilot study was conducted involving 15 BCS with AIMSS. The complex intervention, which included pain science education, patient-led goal setting, and self-management strategies, was administered over 3 months. Feasibility was assessed by measuring overall participation, treatment completion rates, and satisfaction after 3 months of intervention. Additionally, the preliminary efficacy of the intervention was evaluated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with the change in pain intensity (brief pain inventory [BPI] worst pain/stiffness intensity) at 3 months as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

The feasibility assessment showed promising results, with a 70.7% participation rate, an 83.3% intervention completion rate, and a satisfaction score of 8.2 ± 1.5. The intervention significantly reduced BPI worst pain/stiffness intensity by 2.78 points after 3 months (95% CI, - 4.5 to - 0.87, p < 0.01). Secondary outcomes demonstrated significant improvements in disability, quality of life, and pain catastrophizing (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The novel complex intervention appears valuable for management AIMSS in BCS. Future large-scale studies, including randomized controlled trials, are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN-CTR: UMIN 000049035) in October 2022.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

The novel BCS-specific complex intervention program holds the potential to aid in managing AIMSS, improving adherence to AI therapy, and enhancing their quality of life.

From taboo to treatment: The emergence of psychedelics in the management of pain and opioid use disorder

The rise of psychedelics in contemporary medicine has sparked interest in their potential therapeutic applications. While traditionally associated with countercultural movements and recreational use, recent research has shed light on the potential benefits of psychedelics in various mental health conditions. In this review, we explore the possible role of psychedelics in the management of chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD), 2 critical areas in need of innovative treatment options. Pain control remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly for individuals with OUD and those who receive long-term opioid therapy who develop marked tolerance to opioid-induced analgesia. Despite the magnitude of this problem, there is a scarcity of controlled studies investigating pain management alternatives for these populations. Drawing from preclinical and human evidence, we highlight the potential of psychedelics to act on shared neurobiological substrates of chronic pain and OUD, potentially reversing pain- and opioid-induced neuroadaptations, such as central sensitization. We elaborate on the multifaceted dimensions of the pain experience (sensory, affective and cognitive) and their intersections that overlap with opioid-related phenomena (opioid craving and withdrawal), hypothesizing how these processes can be modulated by psychedelics. After summarizing the available clinical research, we propose mechanistic insights and methodological considerations for the design of future translational studies and clinical trials, building on a shared clinical and neurobiological understanding of chronic pain and OUD. Our intention is to provide timely perspectives that accelerate the development and exploration of novel therapeutics for chronic pain and OUD amidst the escalating opioid crisis.

Unraveling the Mechanisms Behind the Short-Term Effects of Dry Needling: New Insights From a Mediation Analysis With Repeatedly Measured Mediators and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To explore the causal pathways underlying the short-term effects of deep dry needling (DDN) in people with chronic neck pain.

DESIGN

Explanatory longitudinal mediation analysis with repeatedly measured mediators and outcomes.

SETTING

Primary care setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=128) with chronic neck pain.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized into 2 groups; DDN of the neck muscles combined with stretching (n=64) and stretching alone (n=64).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Two outcomes (pain intensity and neck pain-related disability) and 3 candidate mediators (local pressure pain thresholds [PPTs], cervical range of motion [ROM], and neck muscle strength) were included. Pain intensity was also included as a competing mediator in the mediation analysis for disability. Mediators and outcomes were measured at 3 time points: after intervention and at 2- and 4-week follow-up. Age, sex, and the baseline values of the outcome and mediators were included as pretreatment mediator-outcome confounders.

RESULTS

Reductions in pain intensity strongly mediated the short-term effects of DDN on disability, from after intervention to 4-week follow-up. In addition, the attenuation of local hypersensitivity (via increasing PPTs) moderately mediated reductions in pain intensity at each time point. On the other hand, gains in cervical ROM contributed to reducing neck pain-related disability. Changes in muscle strength did not lead to better outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel study demonstrated that DDN effect on neck pain-related disability is strongly driven by the analgesic effects of this physical therapy modality. Increasing PPTs and cervical ROM seem to be also part of the mechanisms behind DDN's effect.

Somatosensory profile in individuals with duchenne muscular dystrophy: A quantitative sensory testing (QST) study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to quantify somatosensory profiles in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

METHODS

We included 28 participants with genetically confirmed DMD (aged 8-17 years), 14 with chronic pain (DMD-CP), and 14 without pain (DMD-NP), compared to 13 healthy controls (HC) matched for age and sex. Three quantitative sensory testing (QST) modalities were examined: pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation of pain (TSP) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Characteristics related to chronic pain, fatigue, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life were assessed using questionnaires.

RESULTS

Decreased PPTs were found in both DMD cohorts across body areas commonly affected by pain (rectus femoris, medial gastrocnemius, paraspinal muscles, upper trapezius), as well as in a less frequently affected remote area (thenar eminence), compared to HCs (p < 0.001). The DMD-CP group exhibited greater TSP compared to HCs (p = 0.025). There were no differences in CPM effects between DMD groups and HCs. No differences were detected in all QST measures between DMD-CP and DMD-NP.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study is the first to explore the somatosensory profile in DMD. Preliminary evidence suggests that generalized hyperalgesia may be a common feature in DMD regardless of pain status. QST measures appear to not distinguish individuals with chronic pain from those without and thus are not recommended for assessing pain in DMD or guiding treatment.

Effects of therapeutic exercise on pain processing in people with chronic non-specific neck pain - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain may experience altered sensory processing, potentially contributing to the modest response to therapeutic exercise treatments.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to explore the effect of therapeutic exercise on pain processing among patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SportDiscus, and Cochrane CENTRAL) from inception to June 2023. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing therapeutic exercise to non-exercise treatments or no treatment. The screening and data extraction was conducted by two reviewers. The methodological quality was evaluated using the PEDro scale and the certainty of evidence using GRADE. The primary outcomes assessed were pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation, and conditioned pain modulation.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials included a total of 948 participants, with 586 in the exercise therapy group and 362 in the non-exercise group. The therapeutic exercise was not superior to non-exercise treatments for both local and PPT in the immediate (MD = 0.13, 95%CI = -0.18 to 0.43), and short-term follow-up (MD = 0.17, 95%CI = -0.27 to 0.61). In the medium term, therapeutic exercise demonstrated a small effect size in increasing local PPT (Kg/cm2) (MD = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.08 to 1.19) compared to non-exercise interventions. The certainty of evidence for these outcomes was very low.

CONCLUSIONS

There is very low certainty of evidence that therapeutic exercise is not superior than non-exercise treatment on pain processing in patients with chronic non-specific neck pain.

Contribution of inflammation markers and quantitative sensory testing (QST) indices of central sensitisation to rheumatoid arthritis pain

BACKGROUND

Pain, the primary complaint in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), is multifaceted, and may be driven by inflammatory disease activity and central sensitisation. We aimed to ascertain what proportion of RA pain severity is explained by markers of inflammation and quantitative sensory testing (QST) indices of central sensitisation.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of data from individuals with clinically active RA. Pain severity was assessed using numerical rating scales and inflammation via 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and Ultrasound (Greyscale, Power Doppler). Pain sensitivity was assessed by 'static' (tibialis anterior or brachioradialis pressure pain detection threshold-PPT-TA/PPT-BR) and 'dynamic' (temporal summation-TS, conditioned pain modulation-CPM) QST. Bivariate associations used Spearman's correlation coefficients, and multivariable linear regression models determined relative contributions to pain severity.

RESULTS

In bivariate analyses of N = 96 (age 65 ± 10y, 77% females) people with RA, pain severity was significantly associated with inflammation indices (r = 0.20 to 0.55), and CPM (r=-0.26). In multivariable models that included TS, CPM, age, sex, and body mass index, inflammation indices remained significantly associated with pain severity. Multivariable models explained 22 to 27% of pain variance. Heterogeneity was apparent for associations with pain between subscores for pain now, strongest or average over the past 4-weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with clinically active RA, markers of inflammatory disease activity best explain RA pain with only marginal contributions from QST indices of central sensitisation. Although inflammation plays a key role in the experience of RA pain, the greater proportion of pain severity remains unexplained by DAS28 and ultrasound indices of inflammation.

A myriad of methods to determine temporal summation of pain in people with musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants: a scoping review

Temporal summation of pain (TSP) is a human proxy for wind-up of dorsal horn neurons as assessed in animals. The common paradigm for eliciting TSP is evoked by repetitive nociceptive stimuli of equal intensity. Various stimulation and assessment protocols have been used. This scoping review aims to provide insight into key elements of TSP stimulation and assessment: modality, instruments, test location, familiarization, train characteristics, and calculations. PubMed, Embase, and Ebsco/CINAHL were searched for studies that measured TSP in adults with musculoskeletal conditions and healthy people. Four hundred six studies were included. Mechanical stimuli were the most commonly used modality (250 studies), followed by thermal stimuli (125 studies). Forty-six different instruments were used. Disregarding studies on widespread musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants, 40 studies evaluated TSP at painful sites, 77 in remote areas, and 66 in both locations. Of the 13 tested locations in patients, the hand (74 studies), lower leg (64 studies), and forearm (59 studies) were most commonly tested. A single practice round was the most common familiarization method (46 studies). Repeated stimuli were applied using 31 different frequencies (0.03-200 Hz) and sustained stimulations ranging from 5 to 1080 seconds were used. Twenty-two different train lengths, 63 different calculations (37 absolute, 19 relative, and 7 alternatives using data directly), and 14 different outcome measures (eg, self-reported pain rating scales and reflex thresholds) were used. Temporal summation of pain protocols vary excessively, hindering the comparison and pooling of results. None of the studies provided substantiation for their protocol choice.

Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Greek version

INTRODUCTION

The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) was developed to assess general pain sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the Greek version of PSQ.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated into Greek (PSQ-GR) and piloted in a small sample of patients with chronic pain (n = 35). A total of 146 chronic pain patients and healthy volunteers completed the PSQ-GR, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). To evaluate the test-retest reliability, 36 volunteers completed the PSQ-GR twice over 7 ± 2 days.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.90-0.96) for PSQ-total, PSQ-minor, and PSQ-moderate. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was estimated at 0.90-0.96 for PSQ-total, PSQ-minor and PSQ-moderate and the SEM was 0.59-0.90 for PSQ-total, PSQ-minor and PSQ-moderate approximately. The smallest detectable change was 0.48 for PSQ-total, 0.47 for PSQ-minor and 0.44 for PSQ-moderate. Positive and significant correlations were observed between PSQ-GR and HADS (r = 0.38, p < 0.01), PCS (r = 0.41, p < 0.01) and CSI (r = 0.30, p < 0.01). Statistically significant differences in PSQ-GR scores were identified between the healthy volunteers and the chronic pain patients.

CONCLUSION

The PSQ-GR is a reliable and valid tool that can assess pain sensitivity in healthy individuals and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients.

The Influence of Pain Hypersensitivity and Psychological Factors on Pain and Disability in the Transition From Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain: A Longitudinal Exploratory Investigation and Cluster Analysis

Pain hypersensitivity is present in some people with acute low back pain (LBP) and thought to be involved in the development of chronic LBP. Early evidence suggests that pain hypersensitivity in acute LBP precedes poor long-term outcome. We aimed to examine whether the presence of pain hypersensitivity in acute LBP influenced recovery status at 6 months and differentiated how pain and disability changed over time. Participants with acute nonspecific LBP (<6 weeks after pain onset, N = 118) were included in this longitudinal study. Quantitative sensory testing, including pressure and heat pain thresholds, and conditioned pain modulation and questionnaires were compared at baseline and longitudinally (at 3 and 6 months) between recovered and unrecovered participants. Using k-means clustering, we identified subgroups based on baseline sensory measures alone, and in combination with psychological factors, and compared pain and disability outcomes between subgroups. Sensory measures did not differ at baseline or longitudinally between recovered (N = 50) and unrecovered (N = 68) participants. Subgrouping based on baseline sensory measures alone did not differentiate pain or disability outcomes at any timepoint. Participants with high psychological distress at baseline (N = 19) had greater disability, but not pain, at all timepoints than those with low psychological distress, regardless of the degrees of pain sensitivity. Our findings suggest that pain hypersensitivity in acute LBP does not precede poor recovery at 6 months or differentiate how pain and disability change over time. High psychological distress during acute LBP is associated with unremitting and pronounced disability, while pain severity is unaffected. PERSPECTIVE: Pain hypersensitivity is thought to be involved in the transition to chronic LBP. Contradictory to prevailing hypothesis, our findings suggest pain hypersensitivity alone in acute LBP does not precede poor recovery. High psychological distress in acute LBP has a stronger influence than pain hypersensitivity on long-term disability, but not pain outcomes.

Reliability of a clinical sensory test battery in patients with spine-related leg and arm pain

BACKGROUND

The current standard to evaluate the presence of somatosensory dysfunctions is quantitative sensory testing, but its clinical utility remains limited. Low-cost and time-efficient clinical sensory testing (CST) batteries have thus been developed. Recent studies show moderate to substantial reliability in populations with neuropathic pain. This study evaluates the inter- and intra-tester reliability of people with spine-related leg and arm pain, representing mixed pain mechanisms.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients with spine-related leg (n = 41) and arm pain (n = 12) attended three CST sessions. The CST battery consisted of eleven tests, determining loss and gain of sensory nerve function. CST was performed by the same investigator twice and by an additional investigator to determine inter- and intra-tester reliability. Fleiss' (inter-tester) and Cohen's (intra-tester) kappa were calculated for dichotomized and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Fleiss' kappa varied among modalities from fair to substantial (κ = 0.23-0.66). Cold, warm, and vibration detection thresholds and cold and pressure pain thresholds reached kappa >0.4 (moderate to substantial reliability). Cohen's kappa ranged from moderate to substantial (κ = 0.45-0.66). The reliability of the windup ratio was poor (ICC <0.18).

CONCLUSION

CST modalities with moderate to substantial inter-tester reliability could be of benefit as a screening tool. The moderate to substantial intra-tester reliability for all sensory modalities (except windup ratio) supports their potential use in clinical practice and research to monitor somatosensory changes over time in patients with spine-related limb pain of mixed pain mechanisms.

SIGNIFICANCE

We already know that most modalities of clinical sensory test (CST) batteries achieve moderate to substantial inter- and intra-tester reliability in populations with neuropathic pain. This study evaluates the reliability of a CST battery in populations with mixed pain mechanisms. We found inter-tester reliability varied from poor to substantial for sensory modalities, questioning the value of some CST modalities. The CST battery showed moderate to substantial intra-tester reliability, suggesting its usefulness to monitor sensory changes over time in this cohort.

Reliability of Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in Participants with and without Chronic Shoulder Pain

The objectives of this study were to estimate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in healthy participants and patients with chronic shoulder pain. Additionally, the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) and Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) were calculated. Thirty-one healthy volunteers and twenty patients with chronic shoulder pain were assessed using the PPT and CPM by two raters, with a 24 h interval between sessions. Excellent intra-rater reliability was demonstrated for PPT, with similar SEM and SDC when assessed by the same rater. The inter-rater reliability for PPTs in patients was moderate to good (ICC = 0.59-0.89) with higher SEM (73.83-121.98 kPa) and SDC (61.58-97.59) values than the asymptomatic group (ICC = 0.92-0.96, SEM = 49.61-103.12 kPa, SDC = 42.01-56.30) respectively. CPM's intra-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.82) in the patients and moderate (ICC = 0.67) in the asymptomatic group, while inter-rater reliability was low for the asymptomatic group (ICC = 0.37) and extremely low (ICC = 0.074) for the patients, with comparable SEM and SDC outcomes in both groups. PPT and CPM measurements are highly reliable when conducted by the same rater on the same day. Patients had lower inter-rater PPT reliability but better intra-rater CPM reliability. Clinicians need to be mindful of potential variability when interpreting these test results.

Feasibility and acceptability of remote administration of the cold pressor test

Objective

Quantitative sensory testing is often used to investigate pain in the context of experimental and clinical research studies. However, many of the devices used for QST protocols are only available in resource rich environments, thereby inadvertently limiting the possible pool of participants. Development of remote protocols for appropriate QST measures has the potential to reduce barriers to participation in research.

Methods

Participants with insomnia and Crohn's disease were recruited as part of a clinical trial. We adapted a remote version of the cold pressor test for use during telehealth-based study assessments. Herein, we present data from the baseline assessments including an assessment of feasibility and acceptability of the task.

Results

100% of participants (N = 28) were able to complete the remote cold pressor test using a combination of materials from their homes and mailed by the study team. Temperature changes during the test were minimal and fairly evenly balanced between increases and decreases. Correlations between submersion time and both general and disease specific pain trended toward significance.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that a remote version of the cold pressor test is feasible and acceptable in a clinical population and provided a step-by-step protocol for administration to facilitate use in other studies.

Systemic Inflammation, Sleep, and Psychological Factors Determine Recovery Trajectories for People With Neck Pain: An Exploratory Study

We conducted an explorative prospective cohort study with 6 months follow-up to 1) identify different pain and disability trajectories following an episode of acute neck pain, and 2) assess whether neuroimmune/endocrine, psychological, behavioral, nociceptive processing, clinical outcome, demographic and management-related factors differ between these trajectories. Fifty people with acute neck pain (ie, within 2 weeks of onset) were included. At baseline, and at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 26 weeks follow-up, various neuroimmune/endocrine (eg, inflammatory cytokines and endocrine factors), psychological (eg, stress symptoms), behavioral (eg, sleep disturbances), nociceptive processing (eg, condition pain modulation), clinical outcome (eg, trauma), demographic factors (eg, age), and management-related factors (eg, treatment received) were assessed. Latent class models were performed to identify outcome trajectories for neck pain and disability. Linear mixed models or the Pearson chi-square test were used to evaluate differences in these factors between the trajectories at baseline and at each follow-up assessment and over the entire 6 months period. For pain, 3 trajectories were identified. The majority of patients were assigned to the "Moderate pain - Favourable recovery" trajectory (n = 25; 50%) with smaller proportions assigned to the "Severe pain - Favourable recovery" (n = 16; 32%) and the "Severe pain - Unfavourable recovery" (n = 9; 18%) trajectories. For disability, 2 trajectories were identified: "Mild disability - Favourable recovery" (n = 43; 82%) and "Severe disability - Unfavourable recovery" (n = 7; 18%). Ongoing systemic inflammation (increased high-sensitive C-reactive protein), sleep disturbances, and elevated psychological factors (such as depression, stress and anxiety symptoms) were mainly present in the unfavorable outcome trajectories compared to the favorable outcome trajectories. PERSPECTIVE: Using exploratory analyses, different recovery trajectories for acute neck pain were identified based on disability and pain intensity. These trajectories were influenced by systemic inflammation, sleep disturbances, and psychological factors.

Rethinking neck-related arm pain: hypothetical clinical scenarios to differentiate the underlying IASP-defined pain mechanisms

Neck-related arm pain is frequently encountered in clinical settings, yet its underlying pain mechanisms remain elusive. While such pain radiating from the neck to the arm is often attributed to injuries or diseases of the nervous system (neuropathic pain), it can also arise from nociceptive (referred) or nociplastic sources. Regrettably, patients exhibiting this specific pain distribution are frequently diagnosed with varying terms, including 'cervicobrachialgia', 'cervicobrachial neuralgia', 'cervicobrachial pain syndrome', and 'cervical radiculopathy'. The ambiguity surrounding these diagnostic labels complicates the clinical reasoning process. It is imperative for clinicians to discern and comprehend the dominant pain mechanism. Three distinct hypothetical clinical scenarios depict patients with almost identical pain distribution but divergent dominant pain mechanisms. Within these scenarios, both subjective and objective examinations are employed to elucidate the dominant pain mechanism associated with neck-related arm pain: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. Furthermore, clinicians must remain aware that the dominant pain mechanism can evolve over time.

Biobehavioral Predictors of Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, and Chronic Pain Episodes: A Prospective Cohort Study of African-American Adults

Racial disparities in pain experiences are well-established, with African-American (AA) adults reporting higher rates of daily pain, increased pain severity, and greater pain-related interference compared to non-Hispanic Whites. However, the biobehavioral factors that predict the transition to chronic pain among AA adults are not well understood. This prospective cohort study provided a unique opportunity to evaluate predictors of chronic pain onset among 130 AA adults (81 women), ages 18 to 44, who did not report chronic pain at their baseline assessment and subsequently completed follow-up assessments at 6- and 12-months. Outcome measures included pain intensity, pain-related interference, and chronic pain status. Comprehensive assessments of sociodemographic and biobehavioral factors were used to evaluate demographics, socioeconomic status, stress exposure, psychosocial factors, prolonged hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal secretion, and quantitative sensory testing responses. At baseline, 30 adults (23.1%) reported a history of prior chronic pain. Over the 12-month follow-up period, 13 adults (10.0%) developed a new chronic pain episode, and 18 adults (13.8%) developed a recurrent chronic pain episode. Whereas socioeconomic status measures (ie, annual income, education) predicted changes in pain intensity over the follow-up period, quantitative sensory testing measures (ie, pain threshold, temporal summation of pain) predicted changes in pain interference. A history of chronic pain and higher depressive symptoms at baseline independently predicted the onset of a new chronic pain episode. The present findings highlight distinct subsets of biobehavioral factors that are differentially associated with trajectories of pain intensity, pain-related interference, and onset of chronic pain episodes in AA adults. PERSPECTIVE: This prospective study sought to advance understanding of biobehavioral factors that predicted pain outcomes over a 12-month follow-up period among AA adults without chronic pain at their initial assessment. Findings revealed distinct subsets of factors that were differentially associated with pain intensity, pain-related interference, and onset of chronic pain episodes.

Impact of musculoskeletal disability limitations on the economic unmet dental needs in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disability (MSD) has been identified as having a negative impact on oral health. Patients with MSD have a greater burden of medical expenses and are expected to have an Economic unmet dental need (UDN). This study aimed to conduct a multifactorial analysis based on the Andersen model to determine the extent to which MSD contributes to inequitable dental care use.

METHODS

This study used data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Survey VIII. The study population was 17,903 adults aged 19 years and older. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 26 and the level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS

The people with MSD activity limitations were rare as only 3% in this study population. There were significant differences in sex and education as predisposing factors, income, and marital status as enabling factors, and current smoking, daily brushing, and MSD activity limitation as need factors for experiencing economic UDN. MSD activity limitation was associated with 1.5-fold increased odds of Economic UDN with a fully adjusted Anderson's Behavior Model.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding suggests poorer access to dental care among adults with MSDs owing to financial difficulties. It is necessary to explore various ways to address oral health inequalities among adults with MSD activity limitations.

Pressure Pain Sensitivity and Chronotype: A Population-based Study of Middle-aged Finns

Evening chronotype individuals experience pain more often than morning chronotypes, but relationships with pain sensitivity have rarely been studied. We examined whether chronotype is associated with pressure pain sensitivity, with special reference to mental health disorders, insomnia, and chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain as potential moderating factors. The study sample consisted of members of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 aged 46. Pressure pain threshold and tolerance were measured via the standardized protocol, categorized as lowest quartile versus others. Chronotype (morning [M; the reference], intermediate [I], and evening [E]) was defined using the Short Morningness-Eveningness questionnaire. Sex-stratified binary logistic regression models were separately adjusted for education, body mass index, long-term diseases (fully adjusted model), and for mental health disorders, insomnia, and chronic MSK pain (a residual confounding analysis). Interaction terms (Chronotype × Mental health/insomnia/chronic MSK pain) were tested. The study had 2,132 males and 2,830 females. The E-type males had 1.5-fold odds of having a low pain threshold (fully adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.00) and pressure pain tolerance (fully adjusted OR 1.47, 1.07-2.02), in comparison to M-types. Having a mental health disorder intensified the association with low pain threshold fourfold (4.06, 1.56-10.6). Being an E-type female was also associated with a low pain threshold, but the association was statistically nonsignificant (fully adjusted OR 1.18, .90-1.53). No statistically significant interactions were found among females. These results emphasize the role of chronotype in pain sensitivity and add an understanding of pain experience in light of innate circadian types. PERSPECTIVE: Male evening chronotypes are more sensitive to pain than morning chronotypes. Diagnosed mental health disorders in particular indicate a low pain threshold for evening chronotype males.

Assessment of somatosensory profiles by quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents with and without cerebral palsy and chronic pain

OBJECTIVE

We investigated differences in somatosensory profiles (SSPs) assessed by quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CCP) with and without chronic pain and compared these differences to those in a group of typically developed children and adolescents (TDC) with and without chronic pain.

METHOD

All included subjects were consecutively recruited from and tested at the same outpatient orthopedic clinic by the same investigator. The subjects had their reaction times tested. The SSP consisted of the following tests: warmth (WDT), cool (CDT), mechanical (MDT), and vibration (VDT) detection thresholds; heat (HPT), pressure (PPT), and mechanical (MPT) pain thresholds; wind-up ratio (WUR); dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) and cold pressor test (CPT) using a conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm.

RESULTS

We included 25 CCP and 26 TDC. TDC without chronic pain served as controls. In TDC with chronic pain, WDT, HPT, HPT intensity, and PPT were higher than in controls. No differences in SSPs between CCP with and without chronic pain were observed. In CCP, the MDT, WDT, CDT, and HPT intensity were higher than in controls. CCP had longer reaction times than TDC. There were no differences regarding the remaining variables.

DISCUSSION

In CCP, the SSPs were independent of pain status and findings on MR images. In all CCP the SSPs resembled TDC with chronic pain, compared to TDC without chronic pain. This suggests that CCP do not have the normal neuroplastic adaptive processes that activate and elicit functional changes in the central and peripheral nervous systems.

Is the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) associated with quantitative sensory testing (QST)? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Central sensitization (CS) involves an amplification of neural processing within the central nervous system that can result in widespread pain patterns and hypersensitivity to stimuli. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and various quantitative sensory testing (QST) methods purport to assess clinical markers of CS. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize and quantify the associations between total CSI scores and QST measures from previous studies. A systematic search identified 39 unique studies that were deemed eligible for the systematic review and 33 studies for meta-analyses (with 3314 subjects and 154 effect sizes), including five QST modalities: conditioned pain modulation, temporal summation, pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, and cold pain threshold. The meta-analysis yielded statistically significant CSI-QST correlations in total subject samples for all five QST modalities. The strongest associations were identified between CSI scores and pain threshold testing, especially pressure pain threshold, in which 51% of effects sizes, from 29 studies and 3071 subjects, were determined to be in a medium to large range.

Clinical Assessment of Osteoarthritis Pain: Contemporary Scenario, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

The multifaceted nature of osteoarthritis (OA) pain presents a challenge in understanding and managing the condition. The diverse pain experiences, progression rates, individual responses to treatments, and complex disease mechanisms contribute to heterogeneity in the clinical studies outcomes. The lack of a standardized methodology for assessing and classifying OA pain challenges healthcare practitioners. This complicates the establishment of universally applicable protocols or standardized guidelines for treatment. This article explores the heterogeneity observed in clinical studies evaluating OA pain treatments, highlighting the necessity for refined methodologies, personalized patient categorization, and consistent outcome measures. It discusses the role of the multidimensional nature of OA pain, underlying pain mechanisms, and other contributing factors to the heterogeneity in outcome measures. Addressing these variations is crucial to establishing a more consistent framework for evidence-based treatments and advancing care of the patient with OA pain.

Restoration of normal central pain processing following manual therapy in nonspecific chronic neck pain

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a 4-week manual therapy treatment restores normal functioning of central pain processing mechanisms in non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP), as well as the existence of a possible relationship between changes in pain processing mechanisms and clinical outcome.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients with NSCNP, comprising 79% female, with a mean age of 45.8 years (standard deviation: 14.3), received four treatment sessions (once a week) of manual therapy including articular passive mobilizations, soft tissue mobilization and trigger point treatment. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) were evaluated at baseline and after treatment completion. Therapy outcome was measured using the Global Rating of Change Scale (GROC), the Neck disability Index (NDI), intensity of pain during the last 24 hours, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Two sets of generalized linear mixed models with Gaussian response and the identity link were employed to evaluate the effect of the intervention on clinical, psychological and psychophysical measures and the association between psychophysical and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Following treatment, an increased CPM response (Coefficient: 0.89; 95% credibility interval = 0.14 to 1.65; P = .99) and attenuated TSP (Coefficient: -0.63; 95% credibility interval = -0.82 to -0.43; P = 1.00) were found, along with amelioration of pain and improved clinical status. PPTs at trapezius muscle on the side of neck pain were increased after therapy (Coefficient: 0.22; 95% credibility interval = 0.03 to 0.42; P = .98), but not those on the contralateral trapezius and tibialis anterior muscles. Only minor associations were found between normalization of TSP/CPM and measures of clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Clinical improvement after manual therapy is accompanied by restoration of CPM and TSP responses to normal levels in NSCNP patients. The existence of only minor associations between changes in central pain processing and clinical outcome suggests multiple mechanisms of action of manual therapy in NSCNP.

The normative values of pain thresholds in healthy Taiwanese

OBJECTIVE

Quantitative sensory testing is widely used in clinical and research settings to assess the sensory functions of healthy subjects and patients. It is of importance to establish normative values in a healthy population to provide reference for studies involving patients. Given the absence of normative values for pain thresholds in Taiwan, the aim of this study was to report the normative values for future reference in the Taiwanese population and compare the differences between male and female participants.

METHODS

Healthy adults without any chronic or acute pain condition were recruited. The pain thresholds were assessed over the cephalic (supraorbital area and masseter muscle) and extracephalic (medio-volar forearm and thenar eminence) areas. The heat, cold, mechanical punctate, and pressure pain thresholds were measured with a standardized protocol. Comparisons between male and female participants were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty healthy participants (55 males: 30.4 ± 7.4 years; 75 females: 30.5 ± 8.1 years) finished the assessments. Male participants were less sensitive to mechanical stimuli, including pressure over masseter muscle (male vs. female: 178.5 ± 56.7 vs. 156.6 ± 58.4 kPa, p = .034) and punctate over medio-volar forearm (male vs. female: 116.4 ± 45.2 vs. 98.7 ± 65.4 g, p = .011), compared to female participants. However, female participants were less sensitive to cold stimuli, indicated by lower cold pain thresholds over the supraorbital area (male vs. female: 18.6 ± 8.4 vs. 13.6 ± 9.3°C, p = .004), compared to male participants. No significant differences were found between sexes in other pain threshold parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided the normative values of healthy male and female adults in Taiwan. This information is crucial for comparison in future pain-related studies to identify potential hypoalgesia or hyperalgesia of tested subjects.

Influence of central aspects of pain on self-management in people with chronic low back pain

OBJECTIVE

This observational study investigated whether central aspects of pain are associated with self-management domains in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) undertaking a pain management program.

METHODS

Individuals with CLBP provided pain sensitivity and self-management data at baseline (n = 97) and 3-months (n = 87). Pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at the forearm, temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM), Widespread Pain Index (WPI), and a Central Aspects of Pain factor (CAPf) were considered as central aspects of pain. Self-management was measured using the 8 domains of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire, as well as Pain Self Efficacy and Health Care Utilisation questionnaires.

RESULTS

PPT, CPM, WPI and CAPf predicted worse performance in several self-management domains at 3-months (r = 0.21 to 0.54, p < 0.05 overall). In multivariable regression models (adjusted for baseline scores of self-management, depression, catastrophization, pain and fatigue) low PPT, high TS, and high CAPf at baseline predicted poorer self-management at 3 months (R2 =0.14 to 0.52, β = -0.37 to 0.35, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Central aspects of pain are associated with impaired self-management, over and above effects of pain intensity, fatigue, depression and catastrophizing.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Treatments that target central aspects of pain might help improve self-management in people with CLBP.

Somatosensory and psychosocial profile of migraine patients: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder that involves the brain, characterized by a series of abnormal neuronal networks interacting at different levels of the central and peripheral nervous system. Furthermore, it is known that psychosocial features contribute to the exacerbation and chronicity of symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the somatosensory and psychosocial profiles of migraine patients with a control group.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study comparing the somatosensory and psychosocial profiles of patients with migraine and healthy volunteers. A total of 52 women were included. For the somatosensory profile, Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Temporal Summation (TS), and Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) in the trigeminal and extra-trigeminal areas were evaluated. Psychosocial profiles were assessed using questionnaires, the Central Sensitization Inventory, the Generalized Anxiety Disorders, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in the profiles between groups. The significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

Migraine patients showed a loss of somatosensory function in the trigeminal area for MDT (p = 0.019, r = 0.34 and p = 0.011, r = 0.37 for the ophthalmic nerve and masseter muscle respectively), lower PPT in trigeminal and extra-trigeminal areas (p < 0.001, r=>0.60) and less efficient CPM (p < 0.001, r=>0.60). No statistically significant differences were found in the TS (p=>0.05). Statistically significant differences were found in all psychosocial variables (p = <0.001 r=>0.60).

CONCLUSION

Migraine patients showed loss of somatosensory function, lower pressure pain threshold, and an inhibitory pro-nociceptive profile with high scores on central sensitization and fear of movement compared to the control group.

Pain sensitisation and joint inflammation in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Despite better therapies and strategies, many people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have persistent pain, often from abnormal pain processing, now termed nociplastic pain. However, RA patients with fibromyalgia (FM), a central nociplastic pain syndrome, also have power doppler ultrasound (PDUS+) joint inflammation. To understand the complex causes of pain, we performed clinical examination and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) plus comprehensive PDUS evaluation not previously combined.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study of sequential RA patients with at least moderate DAS28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate disease activity, we assessed 66/68 joints for swelling and tenderness, respectively, FM American College of Rheumatology 2010 diagnostic criteria, completed PROMs for function, quality of life and mood, alongside PDUS examination of 44 joints. Statistical analysis included logistic regression modelling and regularised (lasso) logistic regression methods.

RESULTS

From 158 patients, 72 (46%) patients met FM criteria, with significantly worse tender joint counts and PROMs, but no differences in PDUS compared with the non-FM group. Categorising patients by PDUS+ joint presence and/or FM criteria, we identified four distinct groups: 43 (27.2%) patients with -FM-PD, 43 (27.2%) with -FM+PD, 42 (26.6%) with +FM-PD and 30 (19%) with +FM+PD. Both FM+ groups had worse PROMs for fatigue, mood and pain, compared with the FM- groups. We were unable to develop algorithms to identify different groups.

CONCLUSION

The unexpected group -FM-PD group may have peripheral nociplastic pain, not commonly recognised in rheumatology. Only 46% of patients demonstrated PDUS+ inflammation. However clinical examination and PROMs did not reliably differentiate groups, emphasising PDUS remains an important tool.

Testing Biological and Psychological Pathways of Emotion Regulation as a Primary Mechanism of Action in Yoga Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Interventions that promote adaptive emotion regulation (ER) skills reduce pain in patients with chronic pain; however, whether the effects of yoga practice on chronic low back pain (CLBP) are due to improvements in ER remains to be examined.

OBJECTIVE

This study will test whether the effects of yoga on CLBP (improved pain severity and interference) are mediated by improved ER, the extent to which effects are related to specific aspects of ER, and the role of pain sensitization as a mediator or moderator of effects. In this study, pain sensitization will be assessed by quantitative sensory testing and gene expression profiles to examine whether pain sensitization moderates yoga's effects on pain or whether yoga and ER abilities reduce pain sensitization, leading to decreased pain severity and interference.

METHODS

For this 2-arm parallel group blinded randomized controlled trial, we will enroll 204 adults with CLBP who will be randomized to receive the yoga (n=102) or a control stretching and strengthening (n=102) intervention, which are delivered via web-based synchronous biweekly 75-minute sessions over 12 weeks. Participants are encouraged to practice postures or exercises for 25 minutes on other days using accessible prerecorded practice videos that are sent to participants digitally. Participants will be assessed at 5 time points: baseline, midintervention (6 weeks), postintervention (12 weeks), and 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Assessments of ER, pain severity and interference, pain sensitivity including somatosensory and gene expression profiles, and physical strength and flexibility will be conducted at each visit. The fidelity of the interventions is assessed using a manualized checklist to evaluate recorded group sessions to ensure consistent instructor delivery.

RESULTS

The primary outcome will be the mean change in pain severity as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form at 12 weeks. The primary mechanism of action is ER measured by change in the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale total score. Secondary outcomes include pain sensitivity, physical strength and flexibility, pain interference, and quality of life. A mediation path analysis and series of moderated mediation path analyses will be conducted to test the study hypotheses. As of January 2024, we have enrolled 138 participants. We expect the study to be completed by May 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

The study will provide important data for evaluating whether improvements in ER are responsible for reduced pain perception and pain sensitivity as well as increased quality of life in the context of chronic pain. The study findings have important implications for determining the mechanism of action for yoga and possibly other mind-body interventions as nonpharmacological therapies for pain management. The results of the study will inform the content, delivery, and measures for intervention trials involving yoga as a modality for relieving pain and improving function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04678297; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04678297.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/56016.

Profiling migraine patients according to clinical and psychophysical characteristics: clinical validity of distinct migraine clusters

AIMS

Investigate if different clinical and psychophysical bedside tools can differentiate between district migraine phenotypes in ictal/perictal (cohort 1) and interictal (cohort 2) phases.

METHOD

This observational study included two independent samples in which patients were subgrouped into distinct clusters using standardized bedside assessment tools (headache frequency, disability, cervical active range of motion, pressure pain threshold in different areas): (A) cohort 1-ictal/perictal migraine patients were subgrouped, based on previous studies, into two clusters, i.e., Cluster-1.1 No Psychophysical Impairments (NPI) and Cluster-1.2 Increased Pain Sensitivity and Cervical Musculoskeletal Dysfunction (IPS-CMD); (B) cohort 2-interictal migraine patients were subgrouped into three clusters, i.e., Cluster-2.1 NPI, Cluster-2.2 IPS, and Cluster-2.3 IPS-CMD. Clinical characteristics (multiple questionnaires), somatosensory function (comprehensive quantitative sensory testing (QST)), and cervical musculoskeletal impairments (cervical musculoskeletal assessment) were assessed and compared across headache clusters and a group of 56 healthy controls matched for sex and age.

RESULTS

Cohort 1: A total of 156 subjects were included. Cluster-1.2 (IPS-CMD) had higher headache intensity (p = 0.048), worse headache-related (p = 0.003) and neck-related disability (p = 0.005), worse quality of life (p = 0.003), and higher symptoms related to sensitization (p = 0.001) and psychological burden (p = 0.005) vs. Cluster-1.1(NPI). Furthermore, Cluster-1.2 (IPS-CMD) had (1) reduced cervical active and passive range of motion (p < 0.023), reduced functionality of deep cervical flexors (p < 0.001), and reduced values in all QST(p < 0.001) vs. controls, and (2) reduced active mobility in flexion, left/right lateral flexion (p < 0.045), and reduced values in QST (p < 0.001) vs. Cluster-1.1 (NPI). Cohort 2: A total of 154 subjects were included. Cluster-2.3 (IPS-CMD) had (1) longer disease duration (p = 0.006), higher headache frequency (p = 0.006), disability (p < 0.001), and psychological burden (p = 0.027) vs. Cluster-2.2 (IPS) and (2) higher headache-related disability (p = 0.010), neck-related disability (p = 0.009), and higher symptoms of sensitization (p = 0.018) vs. Cluster-2.1 (NPI). Cluster-2.3(IPS-CMD) had reduced cervical active and passive range of motion (p < 0.034), and reduced functionality of deep cervical flexors (p < 0.001), vs. controls, Custer-2.1 (NPI), and Cluster-2.2 (IPS). Cluster-2.2 (IPS) and 2.3 (IPS-CMD) had reduced QST values vs. controls (p < 0.001) and Cluster-2.1 (p < 0.039).

CONCLUSION

A battery of patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) and quantitative bedside tools can separate migraine clusters with different clinical characteristics, somatosensory functions, and cervical musculoskeletal impairments. This confirms the existence of distinct migraine phenotypes and emphasizes the importance of migraine phases of which the characteristics are assessed. This may have implications for responders and non-responders to anti-migraine medications.

Test-retest reliability of Bayesian estimations of the effects of stimulation, prior information and individual traits on pain perception

BACKGROUND

There is inter-individual variability in the influence of different components (e.g. nociception and expectations) on pain perception. Identifying the individual effect of these components could serve for patient stratification, but only if these influences are stable in time.

METHODS

In this study, 30 healthy participants underwent a cognitive pain paradigm in which they rated pain after viewing a probabilistic cue informing of forthcoming pain intensity and then receiving electrical stimulation. The trial information was then used in a Bayesian probability model to compute the relative weight each participant put on stimulation, cue, cue uncertainty and trait-like bias. The same procedure was repeated 2 weeks later. Relative and absolute test-retest reliability of all measures was assessed.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation results showed good reliability for the effect of the stimulation (0.83), the effect of the cue (0.75) and the trait-like bias (0.75 and 0.75), and a moderate reliability for the effect of the cue uncertainty (0.55). Absolute reliability measures also supported the temporal stability of the results and indicated that a change in parameters corresponding to a difference in pain ratings ranging between 0.47 and 1.45 (depending on the parameters) would be needed to consider differences in outcomes significant. The comparison of these measures with the closest clinical data we possess supports the reliability of our results.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the hypothesis that inter-individual differences in the weight placed on different pain factors are stable in time and could therefore be a possible target for patient stratification.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results demonstrate the temporal stability of the weight healthy individuals place on the different factors leading to the pain response. These findings give validity to the idea of using Bayesian estimations of the influence of different factors on pain as a way to stratify patients for treatment personalization.

Activity-related pain and sensitization predict within- and between-person pain experience in people with knee osteoarthritis: An ecological momentary assessment study

Background and objectives

Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition that often results in pain and disability. Determining factors predicting variability in pain experience is critical to improving clinical outcomes. Underlying pain sensitization and its clinical manifestations, such as activity-related pain, may better predict the knee OA pain experience. This study aimed to determine whether Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) derived sensitization measures and activity-related pain predict knee OA pain experiences collected via smartphone ecological momentary assessment (EMA).

Design

Individuals with knee OA were recruited from an urban community in New Zealand. Those eligible to participate underwent baseline QST with clinical measures of activity-related pain also being collected. The knee OA pain experience was collected via smartphone EMA three times daily for two weeks. Mixed effects location scale models were developed using a multilevel modelling approach.

Results

Eighty-six participants with knee OA participated in the study. Mean age was 67.3 years, with most of the participants being female (64%) and New Zealand European (90.6%). Activity-related pain predicted worse and more variable pain intensity, pain interference, and bothersomeness outcomes within and between individuals with knee OA. Widespread cold hyperalgesia and local mechanical hyperalgesia were shown to predict higher within-person variability in pain intensity and pain interference respectively, while mechanical temporal summation predicted less within-person variability in pain intensity and interference.

Discussion

Those demonstrating activity-related pain and sensitization could be at risk of experiencing worse and more variable knee OA pain in the subsequent weeks. Testing for sensitization in clinical practice could therefore identify those at greatest risk of higher and more variable knee OA pain experiences and in greatest need of treatment. Larger validation studies are required, which include individuals with more severe knee OA.

Program with last minute abstracts of the Padua Days on Muscle and Mobility Medicine, 27 February - 2 March, 2024 (2024Pdm3)

During the 2023 Padua Days on Muscle and Mobility Medicine the 2024 meeting was scheduled from 28 February to 2 March 2024 (2024Pdm3). During autumn 2023 the program was expanded with Scientific Sessions which will take place over five days (in 2024 this includes February 29), starting from the afternoon of 27 February 2024 in the Conference Rooms of the Hotel Petrarca, Thermae of Euganean Hills (Padua), Italy. As per consolidated tradition, the second day will take place in Padua, for the occasion in the Sala San Luca of the Monastery of Santa Giustina in Prato della Valle, Padua, Italy. Confirming the attractiveness of the Padua Days on Muscle and Mobility Medicine, over 100 titles were accepted until 15 December 2023 (many more than expected), forcing the organization of parallel sessions on both 1 and 2 March 2024. The five days will include lectures and oral presentations of scientists and clinicians from Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Romania, Russia, Slovenia, Switzerland, UK and USA. Only Australia, China, India and Japan are missing from this edition. But we are confident that authors from those countries who publish articles in the PAGEpress: European Journal of Translational Myology (EJTM: 2022 ESCI Clarivate's Impact Factor: 2.2; SCOPUS Cite Score: 3.2) will decide to join us in the coming years. Together with the program established by 31 January 2024, the abstracts will circulate during the meeting only in the electronic version of the EJTM Issue 34 (1) 2024. See you soon in person at the Hotel Petrarca in Montegrotto Terme, Padua, for the inauguration scheduled the afternoon of 27 February 2024 or on-line for free via Zoom. Send us your email address if you are not traditional participants listed in Pdm3 and EJTM address books.

An overview of systematic reviews examining the quantitative sensory testing-derived hypoalgesic effects of manual therapy for musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND

Changes in quantitative sensory testing (QST) after manual therapy can provide insight into pain relief mechanisms. Prior systematic reviews have evaluated manual-therapy-induced QST change. This overview of systematic reviews aims to consolidate this body of literature and critically review evidence on the hypoalgesic effects of manual therapy in clinical populations.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Embase. Peer-reviewed systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis were eligible if the reviews examined the effect of manual therapy compared to non-manual therapy interventions on QST outcomes in clinical populations. Methodological quality was assessed with the AMSTAR 2 tool. Meta-analysis results and qualitative (non-meta-analysis) interpretations were summarized by type of manual therapy. Overlap of studies was examined with the corrected covered area (CCA) index.

RESULTS

Thirty systematic reviews, including 11 meta-analyses, met inclusion. There was a slight overlap in studies (CCA of 1.72% for all reviews and 1.69% for meta-analyses). Methodological quality was predominantly low to critically low. Eight (27%) reviews examined studies with a range of manual therapy types, 13 (43%) reviews focused on joint-biased manual therapy, 7 (23%) reviews focused on muscle-biased manual therapy, and 2 (7%) reviews focused on nerve-biased manual therapy. Twenty-nine (97%) reviews reported on pressure pain threshold (PPT). Meta-analytic results demonstrated conflicting evidence that manual therapy results in greater hypoalgesic effects compared to other interventions or controls.

CONCLUSION

Our overview of QST effects, which has relevance to mechanisms underlying hypoalgesia, shows conflicting evidence from mostly low to critically low systematic reviews.

Does manual therapy meaningfully change quantitative sensory testing and patient reported outcome measures in patients with musculoskeletal impairments related to the spine?: A 'trustworthy' systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a 'trustworthy' systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis on the potential mechanisms of manual therapy used to treat spinal impairments.

DESIGN

SR with meta-analysis.

LITERATURE SEARCH

Articles published between January 2010 and October 2022 from CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, and PEDro.

METHODS

This SR included English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving manual therapy to treat spinal impairments in adults. The primary outcome was pressure pain thresholds (PPTs). To synthesize RCTs with high confidence in estimated effects using the GRADE, RCTs with questionable prospective, external, and internal validity, and high risk of bias (RoB) were excluded.

RESULTS

Following title and abstract screening, 89 full-text RCTs were reviewed. Twenty-two studies included the criteria of interest. Sixteen were not prospectively registered, two contained discussion/conclusions judged to be inconsistent with the registry, and one was rated as having a high RoB. Three studies met the inclusion criteria; heterogeneous interventions and locations for PPT testing prevented synthesis into practice recommendations. The two studies with high confidence in estimated effects had small effect sizes, and one study had confidence intervals that crossed zero for the outcome measures of interest.

DISCUSSION

Standardized PPT testing, as a potential measure of centrally mediated pain, could provide clues regarding the mechanisms of manual therapy or help identify/refine research questions.

CONCLUSION

High-quality RCTs could not be synthesized into strong conclusions secondary to the dissimilarity in research designs. Future research regarding quantitative sensory testing should develop RCTs with high confidence in estimated effects that can be translated into strong recommendations.