Biomechanical Variability and Usability of a Novel Customizable Fracture Fixation Technique

A novel in situ customizable osteosynthesis technique, Bonevolent™ AdhFix, demonstrates promising biomechanical properties under the expertise of a single trained operator. This study assesses inter- and intra-surgeon biomechanical variability and usability of the AdhFix osteosynthesis platform. Six surgeons conducted ten osteosyntheses on a synthetic bone fracture model after reviewing an instruction manual and completing one supervised osteosynthesis. Samples underwent 4-point bending tests at a quasi-static loading rate, and the maximum bending moment (BM), bending stiffness (BS), and AdhFix cross-sectional area (CSA: mm²) were evaluated. All constructs exhibited a consistent appearance and were suitable for biomechanical testing. The mean BM was 2.64 ± 0.57 Nm, and the mean BS was 4.35 ± 0.44 Nm/mm. Statistically significant differences were observed among the six surgeons in BM (p < 0.001) and BS (p = 0.004). Throughout ten trials, only one surgeon demonstrated a significant improvement in BM (p < 0.025), and another showed a significant improvement in BS (p < 0.01). A larger CSA corresponded to a statistically significantly higher value for BM (p < 0.001) but not for BS (p = 0.594). In conclusion, this study found consistent biomechanical stability both across and within the surgeons included, suggesting that the AdhFix osteosynthesis platform can be learned and applied with minimal training and, therefore, might be a clinically viable fracture fixation technique. The variability in BM and BS observed is not expected to have a clinical impact, but future clinical studies are warranted.

Does the use of polymethyl-methacrylate cement after intralesional curettage of giant cell tumors of appendicular bone guarantee reduced local recurrence rates? A retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

Polymethyl-methacrylate cement (PMMA) is often used as bone defect reconstruction material after surgical removal of giant cell tumors. The purpose of this study was to investigate if the application of PMMA improves the local recurrence rates for giant cell tumors (GCT) of appendicular bone treated with intralesional curettage.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all appendicular GTCs treated at two major Danish sarcoma centres between the 1st of January 1998 and December 31st 2013; minimum follow-up of 3.0 years (median: 8.9; 1.3-18.7 years). Kaplan-Meier survival model, log-rank and multivariate Cox regression were used to calculate and compare local recurrence rates. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

102 patients (M59/F43), median age 31Y (11-84) were included in this study. The overall 3-years local recurrence-rate was 19.9% (95%CI: 11.9-27.9%); 91% had occurred within 3 years. In patients treated with intralesional curettage (n = 64), the 3-years recurrence-rate was 30.6% (95%CI: 18.8-42.4%), compared to 2.6% (95%CI: 0.0-7.8%) in patients treated with wide resection or amputation (n = 38), p < .001. The 3-years recurrence-rate for patients treated with intralesional curettage and reconstruction using PMMA was 29.0% (95%CI: 12.6-45.4%) and without PMMA: 31.8% (95%CI: 15.2-48.4%), p = .83.

CONCLUSION

We found that the use of PMMA for bone defect reconstruction after intralesional curettage of GTCs in the appendicular skeleton did not ensure a reduced risk of local recurrence.