Mechanisms of injustice: what we (do not) know about racialized disparities in pain

Maternal oxytocin administration mitigates nociceptive, social, and epigenetic impairments in adolescent offspring exposed to perinatal trauma

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) alter brain development, leading to vulnerability for chronic pain, mental health disorders, and suicidality. These effects often emerge during adolescence. Importantly, ACEs can occur prenatally, including when exposed to in utero intimate partner violence (IPV) or postnatally as maternal neglect. Maternal social support has demonstrated promise in the mitigation of ACE-related deficits. Oxytocin, which has a role in social-bonding and stress regulation, serves as a suitable surrogate for social support in preclinical studies. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effects of oxytocin on alleviating social deficits, nociception, and epigenetic changes resulting from models that aimed to mimic the stress normally induced following exposure to two ACEs: IPV in utero and maternal neglect. During pregnancy, dams were randomly assigned to experience the model of IPV or a sham insult. Following birth, offspring from the IPV group underwent 10 days of maternal separation. Dams received three days of oxytocin therapy while nursing. In adolescence, half of the offspring underwent a plantar surgery to induce pain. Overall, in adolescence, rats exposed to the ACEs exhibited increased nociceptive sensitivity and aberrant social interactions, particularly among males, further suggesting that ACEs can increase an individual's risk for chronic pain. The ACEs changed gene expression related to social behaviour and neuroplasticity. Maternal oxytocin normalized pain, social, and gene changes, while oxytocin levels in offspring correlated with nociceptive sensitivity. Although ACEs have enduring consequences, the outcomes are modifiable, and oxytocin may be a robust and implementable therapeutic capable of attenuating early adversity.

Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD): A pilot randomized trial

Despite increased calls for improved health equity, Black patients continue to experience worse pain and associated outcomes. Black patients are also offered fewer pain treatment options than White patients and report poorer quality communication with clinicians, including lower participation in shared decision-making. Comorbid depressive symptoms can impede effective pain management and participation in decision-making. The Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression (EQUIPD; NCT05695209) pilot study examined feasibility of a one-on-one coaching intervention, paired with a decision aid, to facilitate shared decision-making about evidence-based nonpharmacological pain treatments for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and symptoms of at least mild depression. We recruited and randomized 30 participants at a rate of 7.5 per month, with 90% retention at 3 months and 87% at 6 months. Intervention participation was high, with 94% of participants completing at least 3 of 4 coaching sessions. Fidelity was also high. Although not powered for effectiveness, most outcomes, including pain interference, depression, anxiety, patient engagement, and shared decision-making, improved, favoring the intervention, with effect sizes ranging from 0.30-0.75 at 3 months. Results indicate that EQUIPD holds promise as an intervention to support autonomy and shared decision-making for Black patients with chronic pain and elevated depressive symptoms. PERSPECTIVE: The EQUIPD intervention, which included one-on-one coaching combined with a decision aid to increase shared decision-making about nonpharmacological pain treatments, was feasible and shows promise in improving pain and related outcomes for Black patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms.

Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: Nursing Recommendations Supporting ASPMN's 2024 Position Statement

The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. This practice recommendation's goals are to 1) summarize known pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices among commonly marginalized and at risk groups, 2) offer recommendations to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all people, and 3) outline a call to action for all nurses to embrace diversity, equity, inclusion, and a sense of belonging in order to mitigate pain-related disparities, inequities, and injustices within clinical environments and the nursing profession. This paper provides background and rationale for the 2024 ASPMN position statement on disparities, inequities and injustices in people with pain.

Self-rated pain and observed pain behavior in Black and White Americans with chronic low back pain

Black Americans report more intense and disabling pain than White Americans, but differences in pain behavior have rarely been studied. The Structured Pain Behavior Test (SPBT), a standardized, video-recorded series of pain-inducing movements, assesses the behavioral expression of pain. We conducted the first test of whether Black Americans with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have greater pain behavior and increased self-reported pain intensity during the SPBT, compared to White Americans. Adults (N = 267) with CLBP (174 Black, 93 White; 57% female) rated their clinical pain severity and interference (Multidimensional Pain Inventory; MPI) and their current pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale; NRS) both before and after engaging in the SPBT, which was coded for observed pain behavior. Consistent with prior research, Black participants reported greater MPI clinical pain severity and interference (large effect). More importantly, during the SPBT, Black participants had greater pain behavior (medium effect) and reported a greater increase in pain intensity (NRS; small-medium effect) than did Whites. Racialized differences in all pain measures remained significant after controlling for multiple variables (including depressive symptoms and pain catastrophizing), and differences in observed pain behavior remained after also controlling for self-reported pain intensity (NRS) or MPI clinical pain severity. We conclude that greater self-reported pain severity and interference among Black Americans is accompanied by greater pain behavior and increased pain intensity in response to pain-inducing movements. Research should examine possible mechanisms of this racialized difference, including differential access and care, racism as pain exacerbator, and the social communication of pain. PERSPECTIVE: Black Americans with chronic back pain have greater self-reported pain severity than White Americans and greater pain behavior during the Structured Pain Behavior Test, even after controlling for self-reported pain and other variables. Black Americans' elevated pain may reflect poorer health care, racism-induced pain exacerbation, and/or social communication of need.

Disparities, Inequities, and Injustices in Populations With Pain: An ASPMN Position Statement

Disparities, inequities, and injustices in populations with pain are historically pervasive and lead to deleterious patient outcomes and perpetuate systemic barriers to achieving equitable pain management. The American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN) upholds the principle that all persons with pain have equal rights to evidence-based, high quality pain assessment, management, and treatment. Intervening at multilevels (i.e., individual, interpersonal, community, societal) is necessary to ascertain that just and equitable pain care is provided to all populations.

The need for epistemic humility in AI-assisted pain assessment

It has been difficult historically for physicians, patients, and philosophers alike to quantify pain given that pain is commonly understood as an individual and subjective experience. The process of measuring and diagnosing pain is often a fraught and complicated process. New developments in diagnostic technologies assisted by artificial intelligence promise more accurate and efficient diagnosis for patients, but these tools are known to reproduce and further entrench existing issues within the healthcare system, such as poor patient treatment and the replication of systemic biases. In this paper we present the argument that there are several ethical-epistemic issues with the potential implementation of these technologies in pain management settings. We draw on literature about self-trust and epistemic and testimonial injustice to make these claims. We conclude with a proposal that the adoption of epistemic humility on the part of both AI tool developers and clinicians can contribute to a climate of trust in and beyond the pain management context and lead to a more just approach to the implementation of AI in pain diagnosis and management.

Navigating the light and shadow of scientific publishing faced with machine learning and generative AI

BACKGROUND

The public release of ChatGPT in November 2022 sparked a boom and public interest in generative artificial intelligence (AI) that has led to journals and journal families hastily releasing generative AI policies, ranging from asking authors for acknowledgement or declaration to the outright banning of use.

RESULTS

Here, we briefly discuss the basics of machine learning, generative AI, and how it will affect scientific publishing. We focus especially on potential risks and benefits to the scientific community as a whole and journals specifically.

CONCLUSION

While the concerns of editors, for example about manufactured studies, are valid, some recently implemented or suggested policies will not be sustainable in the long run. The quality of generated text and code is quickly becoming so high that it will not only be impossible to detect the use of generative AI but would also mean taking a powerful tool away from researchers that can make their life easier every day.

SIGNIFICANCE

We discuss the history and current state of AI and highlight its relevance for medical publishing and pain research. We provide guidance on how to act now to increase good scientific practice in the world of ChatGPT and call for a task force focusing on improving publishing pain research with use of generative AI.

Multisite pain among United States Veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder: Prevalence, predictors, and associations with symptom clusters

Persistent pain in multiple distinct body sites is associated with poorer functional outcomes above and beyond pain intensity and interference. Veterans, and especially those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), may be at risk for multisite pain. However, the research to date characterizing this presentation is limited. This secondary analysis examined the prevalence of multisite pain in a cross-sectional sample of Veterans and explored demographic, military service-related, and PTSD symptom cluster variables associated with multisite pain among those with clinically significant PTSD symptoms. Participants were 4303 post-9/11 U.S. Veterans (16.55% female gender, 58.45% White/Caucasian, Mage = 35.52), of whom 1375 (31.95%) had clinically significant PTSD symptoms. Multisite pain was defined as endorsing pain that "bothered [me] a lot" in ≥3 body sites out of 5 on the Patient Healthcare Questionnaire-15. A total of 20.03% of all participants, and 40.00% of those with likely PTSD, reported multisite pain. Female gender (OR = 1.55), older age (OR = 1.70), minority race identification (White/Caucasian racial identity OR = 0.75), history of military sexual trauma (OR = 1.99), and spine, abdomen and joint/muscle injuries (ORs = 1.66-3.68) were associated with higher odds of multisite pain. Adjusting for these potential confounders, higher z-scores on the PTSD arousal/reactivity (OR = 1.58, p <.001) subscale was associated with higher multisite pain odds. In summary, multisite pain was common among Veterans with PTSD, especially those who experienced military sexual trauma or certain physical injuries. Multisite pain and PTSD may be associated due to a shared threat reactivity mechanism. PERSPECTIVE: This study investigates the rates and factors associated with having pain in three or more distinct body sites (multisite pain) among United States Veterans. The study findings highlight the unique importance of specific posttraumatic stress symptoms and experiences associated with multisite pain.

Fibromyalgia Diagnosis and Treatment Receipt in the U.S. Military Health System

INTRODUCTION

Meta-analytic findings and clinical practice guidance recommend pharmacological (e.g., pregabalin, duloxetine, and milnacipran) and non-pharmacological (e.g., exercise and sleep hygiene) interventions to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life in people living with fibromyalgia. However, some of these therapies may lack robust evidence as to their efficacy, have side effects that may outweigh benefits, or carry risks. Although the annual prevalence of fibromyalgia in active duty service members was estimated to be 0.015% in 2018, the likelihood of receiving a fibromyalgia diagnosis was 9 times greater in patients assigned female than male and twice as common in non-Hispanic Black than White service members. Therefore, the primary goal of this retrospective study is to examine co-occurring conditions and pain-management care receipt in the 3 months before and 3 months after fibromyalgia diagnosis in active duty service members from 2015 to 2022.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical record information from active duty service members who received a fibromyalgia diagnosis between 2015 and 2022 in the U.S. Military Health System was included in the analyses. Bivariate analyses evaluated inequities in co-occurring diagnoses (abdominal and pelvic pain, insomnia, psychiatric conditions, and migraines), health care (acupuncture and dry needling, biofeedback and other muscle relaxation, chiropractic and osteopathic treatments, exercise classes and activities, massage therapy, behavioral health care, other physical interventions, physical therapy, self-care management, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), and prescription receipt (anxiolytics, gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-opioid pain medication, opioids, selective serotonin and norepinephrine inhibitors, and tramadol) across race and ethnicity and assigned sex. Pairwise comparisons were made using a false discovery rate adjusted P value.

RESULTS

Overall, 13,663 service members received a fibromyalgia diagnosis during the study period. Approximately 52% received a follow-up visit within 3 months of index diagnosis. Most service members received a co-occurring psychiatric diagnosis (35%), followed by insomnia (24%), migraines (20%), and abdominal and pelvic pain diagnoses (19%) fibromyalgia diagnosis. At least half received exercise classes and activities (52%), behavioral health care (52%), or physical therapy (50%). Less commonly received therapies included other physical interventions (41%), chiropractic/osteopathic care (40%), massage therapy (40%), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (33%), self-care education (29%), biofeedback and other muscle relaxation therapies (22%), and acupuncture or dry needling (14%). The most common prescriptions received were non-opioid pain medications (72%), followed by muscle relaxers (44%), opioids (32%), anxiolytics (31%), gabapentinoids (26%), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (21%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (20%), and tramadol (15%). There were many inequities identified across outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Overall, service members diagnosed with fibromyalgia received variable guideline-congruent health care within the 3 months before and after fibromyalgia diagnosis. Almost 1 in 3 service members received an opioid prescription, which has been explicitly recommended against use in guidelines. Pairwise comparisons indicated unwarranted variation across assigned sex and race and ethnicity in both co-occurring health conditions and care receipt. Underlying reasons for health and health care inequities can be multisourced and modifiable. It is unclear whether the U.S. Military Health System has consolidated patient resources to support patients living with fibromyalgia and if so, the extent to which such resources are accessible and known to patients and their clinicians.

Associations of ethnic identity, religiosity, discrimination, and injustice appraisal with pain-related outcomes in arab americans with chronic back pain

This study sought to examine the moderating roles of ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity on the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisal and chronic low back pain (CLBP) outcomes among a sample of Arab-Americans, who are an underrepresented population in prior pain research. The study also aimed to examine the mediating effect of pain-related injustice appraisal in the relationship between discrimination and CLBP outcomes. The sample included 96 Arab-American adults who completed an online survey concerning their CLBP. Multiple regression was used to examine the moderating role of ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity on the relationship between injustice appraisal and disability and depression. Findings showed that ethnic identity (β = 0.43, p = 0.03) and religiosity (β = 0.28, p = 0.04), but not acculturation, buffered the relationship between pain-related injustice appraisal and CLBP-related depressive symptoms. Perceived discrimination predicted higher pain intensity (β = 0.28), disability (β = 0.56), and depressive symptoms (β = 0.51). Pain-related injustice appraisal significantly mediated the relationship between discrimination and CLBP-related disability (β = 0.24, p < 0.0001), and depressive symptoms (β = 0.22, p < 0.0001). The current study is the first to examine the role of unique ethnic characteristics, namely ethnic identity, acculturation, and religiosity, within the context of pain-related injustice appraisal. The results support the role of broader sociocultural and societal factors, such as ethnic-based discrimination, within the context of pain-related injustice appraisal as well as the influence of intra- and interpersonal factors and their interactions on pain-related injustice appraisal. PERSPECTIVE: This study is the first to demonstrate the unique role of ethnic identification, acculturation, and religiosity within the concept of pain-related injustice appraisal, specifically among Arab-Americans with chronic low back pain. This understanding could potentially help basic researchers, clinical scientists, as well as clinicians.

The relationship between college students' belief in a just world and online prosocial behavior

Previous studies have highlighted the critical role that the belief in a just world (BJW) plays in maintaining and promoting prosocial behaviors within individuals. Considered a stable personality trait, the crux of BJW lies in the conviction that individuals receive what they deserve, and deserve what they receive. Simultaneously, the relationship between BJW and prosocial behavior is impacted by an individual's sense of fairness or unfairness. However, past research has primarily focused on real-life prosocial behavior, with limited exploration into the relationship between BJW and online prosocial behavior. This study, comprising a survey and an experiment, aimed to delve deeper into this relationship. The survey section randomly selected 4212 college students to examine how BJW correlates with online prosocial behavior. Findings predominantly revealed a significant positive correlation between online prosocial behavior and BJW. Additionally, the study explored how gender and place of origin influence these behaviors. Results showed that male students and those from urban areas exhibited significantly higher online prosocial behavior. The experimental research investigated the performance differences in online prosocial behaviors among college students under different fairness scenarios, revealing that the online prosocial behavior in an unfair situation was significantly higher than in fair or neutral situations. Furthermore, in unfair situations, a significant correlation was observed between BJW and online prosocial behavior. The findings from this study significantly advance our understanding of the dynamics between BJW and online prosocial behavior among college students, emphasizing that perceived injustices can markedly enhance prosocial behaviors in virtual settings. This study underscores the profound impact of fairness perceptions and highlights the modulating effects of gender and geographical background on online interactions.

Factor Structure of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form in African American Older Adults With Osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the factor structure of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) and measurement invariance across two age groups for African American (AA) older adults with osteoarthritis (OA).

METHOD

Participants were AA older adults aged 50 to 94 years with self-reported OA and chronic pain (N = 110). Cross-sectional data from the BPI-SF were obtained from all participants, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the factor structure. Measurement invariance across young-old (aged 50 to 69 years) and old-old (aged 70 to 94 years) participants was examined at configural, full metric, and full scalar levels.

RESULTS

CFA revealed that a three-factor model (i.e., pain intensity, activity interference, and affective interference) demonstrated the best fit (χ2/df = 1.595, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.949, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.074). The change of CFI between configural and metric invariance was below the cutoff point of 0.01, supporting full metric (i.e., factor loadings) invariance across the two age groups. However, full scalar (i.e., item intercepts) invariance was not demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Results support a three-factor structure of the BPI-SF, which is consistent across two age groups for AA older adults with OA. This study provides evidence that the BPI-SF can reliably measure pain intensity and two distinct dimensions of pain interference in this population. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 51(2), 13-22.].

Understanding Needs for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Management in a Northern Dene and Métis Community: A Community Based Needs Assessment

Background

Chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain disproportionately affects Indigenous Peoples, and rural/remote communities face significant barriers in accessing care. La Loche, a Dene/Métis community in northern Saskatchewan, has limited access to specialized chronic pain management services and specialized health providers.

Aims

The aim of this needs assessment was to gain insight into the community's priorities, strengths, and concerns regarding chronic MSK pain management. Community engagement and relationship building were essential to ensure that cultural protocols were respected and community worldviews were accurately represented.

Methods

A community-directed needs assessment was conducted in collaboration with local health care providers and community members. To ensure appropriate representation of community-led priorities, reflexive thematic analysis was utilized and rooted within interpretive description and informed by community-based participatory research and Two-Eyed Seeing. Open discussions were conducted in person, over the phone, or via Zoom in a semistructured format. Thirteen individuals were interviewed (eight community members, five health care professionals).

Results

Interviews conducted with community members and health care providers were analyzed separately. Both yielded the same four major overarching themes: (1) impact of pain on daily living, (2) barriers limiting access to care and the understanding of pain between health care provider and patient, (3) systemic oppression and negative experiences with health care, and (4) strength-based solutions.

Conclusions

Five recommendations were developed to promote culturally safe and patient-centered environments for chronic MSK pain communication and future care delivery: (1) person-centered and community-directed care, (2) clinic model and staffing requirements, (3) practitioner education and awareness, (4) community education and awareness, and (5) community resources.

Disparities in access but not outcomes: Medicaid versus non-Medicaid patients in multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation

Purpose: There are known disparities in chronic pain severity, treatment, and opioid-related risks amongst individuals from lower socioeconomic status, including Medicaid beneficiaries, but little is known about whether Medicaid beneficiaries benefit in a similar way from multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation. This study investigated differences in clinical outcomes between Medicaid and non-Medicaid beneficiaries who completed a 3-week multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program.Methods: Participants (N = 131) completed a broad range of clinical measures pre- and post-treatment including pain severity, pain interference, depression, anxiety, objective physical functioning, and opioid misuse risk. Patients with Medicaid were compared with non-Medicaid patients in terms of baseline characteristics and rate of change, utilizing two-factor repeated measures analyses of variance.Results: There were baseline characteristic differences, with Medicaid beneficiaries being more likely to be African American, have higher rates of pain, worse physical functioning, and lower rates of opioid use. Despite baseline differences, both groups demonstrated significantly improved outcomes across all measures (p<.001) and no significant difference in rate of improvement.Conclusions: Results suggest that pain rehabilitation is as effective for Medicaid recipients as non-Medicaid recipients. Patients with Medicaid are particularly vulnerable to disparities in treatment, so efforts to expand access to multidisciplinary pain treatments are warranted.

Health Care Discrimination Affects Patient Activation, Communication Self-Efficacy, and Pain for Black Americans

This study examines whether a key psychosocial factor-perceiving racial discrimination in health care-is associated with worse patient activation, communication self-efficacy, and physical health outcomes for Black veterans with chronic pain. Moreover, we explore the role of physician-patient working alliance as a moderator that may alleviate the potential consequences of perceiving racial discrimination. This work is a secondary analysis of baseline data from a clinical trial with 250 U.S. Black veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Participants were recruited from primary care clinics at a Midwestern VA hospital between 2018 and 2021. Perceiving racial discrimination in health care was associated with lower patient activation, lower self-efficacy in communicating with one's physician, higher pain intensity, and lower pain management self-efficacy (ps < .049) but was unrelated to reports of pain interference or use of pain coping strategies (ps > .157). Although the relationship between perceived discrimination and patient activation was moderated by working alliance (P = .014), having a stronger working alliance improved patient activation to varying degrees across levels of perceived discrimination (rather than buffering against negative outcomes when perceiving higher levels of discrimination). Moderation was not significant on any other measures. This study deepens our understanding of the broad range of health outcomes that are (not) associated with perceiving racial discrimination in health care. Contrary to prior theorizing, this work also indicates that having a strong working alliance does not attenuate the consequences of perceiving discrimination among Black individuals living with pain. These results highlight the need for system-level interventions to address perceptions of racial mistreatment in health care. PERSPECTIVE: This work has important public health implications by identifying the broad range of outcomes associated with perceived discrimination in health care among Black Americans. Importantly, a strong physician-patient relationship did not buffer Black individuals from the consequences of perceiving discrimination. These findings inform intervention targets to mitigate racial health disparities.

Psychosocial dimensions of pain disparities in youth diagnosed with unspecified abdominal pain in an emergency department

Diagnosis ambiguity, paired with pain care inequities experienced by marginalized groups may increase risk for ongoing pain and impairment in children diagnosed with unspecified abdominal pain in the pediatric emergency department (PED). This cross-sectional study examined psychological, caregiver, cultural, and socio-ecological factors associated with pain-related impairment in an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse population diagnosed with unspecified abdominal pain in a PED. The sample included 111 children 8-17 years old (59.8 % female, 72.7 % Latinx) and their caregivers. Exclusion criteria included an Emergency Severity Index < 2, psychiatric complaint, or not fluent in English or Spanish. Children completed the PROMIS Pain Interference Scale and reported pain intensity, pain duration, and pain catastrophizing. Caregivers reported language preference, pain catastrophizing, trait anxiety, and child internalizing symptoms. Area Deprivation Index quantified socio-ecological deprivation according to 9-digit zip code. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified independent associations with likelihood of reporting severe levels of pain-related impairment. Approximately 35.3 % of children reported severe levels of pain-related impairment. In logistic regression analysis, an increased likelihood of endorsing severe pain-related impairment was associated with pain for > 1 month (OR=9.19, p = .044), higher child pain catastrophizing (OR=1.23, p < .001), caregiver Spanish language (OR=11.11, p = .044), and clinically significant caregiver trait anxiety (OR=58.16, p = .004). Results highlight the incidence of severe pain-related impairment in children diagnosed with unspecified abdominal pain in a PED. Moreover, findings underscore the importance of screening pain-related impairment and caregiver anxiety, and addressing language barriers in this PED population. PERSPECTIVE: This paper highlights the incidence of severe pain-related impairment among pediatric patients diagnosed with unspecified abdominal pain in a pediatric emergency department (PED). Results could inform early assessment and targeted interventions in the PED to prevent outcome disparities.

Disparities Based on Demographic Features in the Intensity and Treatment of Chronic Pain in US Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

Informed by Minority Stress Theory, to investigate disparities in pain intensity, interference, and care in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) based on demographic features.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Outpatient SCI clinics in 2 academic medical centers in the northwestern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Sample of 242 SCI clinic patients who endorsed SCI-related pain, were ≥18-years-of-age, English-fluent, not diagnosed with bipolar or psychotic disorders, and able to make their own medical decisions. Participants were 74.8% men, an average of 48.5 years (range 18.1-89.8 years), 76.2% White, 31.9% privately insured, and 64.7% making <$50,000 per year.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Exploratory analyses of screening data from a randomized controlled trial for pain treatment. Primary outcomes included pain intensity, pain interference, and the patient report of recommended pain treatments by a medical provider, tried by the patient, or that the patient would be willing to try.

RESULTS

More treatments recommended was associated with younger age (ρ=-0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01 to -0.27, P=.03) and private insurance (ρ=-0.15, 95% CI: 0.02-0.27, P=.03), whereas more treatments tried was associated with private insurance alone (ρ=0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.32, P=.003). Number of treatments willing to be tried was associated with lower income (ρ=-0.15, 95% CI: -0.02 to -0.28, P=.03). SCI patients of color (PoC) reported higher pain intensity (Cohen's d=0.41, 95% CI: 0.11-0.71) and greater odds of receiving psychotherapy for pain (odds ratio: 7.12, 95% CI: 1.25-40.46) than their White peers.

CONCLUSIONS

These exploratory findings indicate differences in SCI-related pain intensity based on identifying as PoC, and differences in SCI-related pain treatment modalities based on identifying as PoC, age, insurance type, and income. Further work exploring differences in SCI-related pain care based on patient social identities is warranted.

A Longitudinal Multivariable Analysis: State Policies and Opioid Dispensing in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Surgery

BACKGROUND

States have implemented policies to decrease clinically unnecessary opioid prescribing, but few studies have examined how state policies affect opioid dispensing rate trends for surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE

To examine trends in the perioperative opioid dispensing rates for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries and the effects of select state policies.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study using 2006 to 2018 Medicare claims data for individuals undergoing surgical procedures for which opioid analgesic treatment is common.

EXPOSURES

State policies mandating prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP; PDMP policies) use, initial opioid prescription duration limit (duration limit policies), and mandated continuing medical education (CME; CME pain policies) on pain management.

MAIN MEASURES

Opioid dispensing rates, days' supply, and the daily morphine milligram equivalent dose (MMED).

KEY RESULTS

The percentage of Medicare beneficiaries dispensed opioids in the perioperative period increased from 2007 to 2018; MMED and days' supply decreased over the same period, with significant variation by age, sex, and race. None of the three state policies affected the likelihood of Medicare beneficiaries being dispensed perioperative opioids. However, CME pain policies and duration limit policies were associated with decreased days' supply and decreased MMED in the several years following implementation, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While we observed a slight increase in the rate of Medicare beneficiaries dispensed opioids perioperatively and a substantial decrease in MMED and days' supply for those receiving opioids, state policies examined had relatively modest effects on the main measures. Our findings suggest that these state policies may have a limited impact on opioid dispensing for a patient population that is commonly dispensed opioid analgesics to help control surgical pain, and as a result may have little direct effect on clinical outcomes for this population. Changes in opioid dispensing for this population may be the result of broader societal trends than such state policies.

The Impact of Stressful Life Events on Centralized Pain and Pain Intensity: A Combined Model Examining the Mediating Roles of Anger and Perceived Injustice Among Racially Minoritized Adults With Chronic Pain

Stressful life events are highly associated with chronic pain. Yet, research is needed to identify the psychological mechanisms that link life adversity and pain, especially studies that test comprehensive models, recruit racially diverse samples, and measure varied pain-related symptoms. This study examined the relationship between stressful life events and pain in a racially diverse sample and tested the potential mediating roles of both anger and perceived injustice. Both centralized pain symptoms and pain intensity were the outcomes. Analyses consisted of 2 cross-sectional, mediation models among 673 adults with self-reported chronic pain who were racially diverse (Black: n = 258, Latine: n = 254, Asian American: n = 161). The results indicated a positive relationship between stressful life events and centralized pain symptoms (b = 2.53, P < .001) and pain intensity (b = .20, P < .001). In parallel mediation analyses, anger (b = .91, 95% CI = .67, 1.17) and perceived injustice (b = .86, 95% CI = .64, 1.11) acted as partial mediators on centralized pain symptoms. Also, anger (b = .05, 95% CI = .03, .08) and perceived injustice (b = .11, 95% CI = .08, .14) acted as full mediators on pain intensity. The combined psychosocial variables accounted for 51% of centralized pain symptoms and 26% of pain intensity. The findings suggest that psychosocial factors are significantly associated with pain outcomes. Future research is needed to investigate exposure to adversity in life, anger, and perceived injustice together as psychosocial mechanisms of pain symptoms. PERSPECTIVE: Among racially minoritized adults with chronic pain, this article presents empirical evidence that stressful life events, anger, and perceived injustice are associated with centralized pain symptoms and pain intensity. This could guide psychological intervention to focus on anger and perceived injustice, especially when addressing centralized pain.

Pain experiences during intrauterine device procedures: a thematic analysis of tweets

INTRODUCTION

In June 2021, high-profile testimonials in the media about pain during intrauterine device (IUD) procedures in the UK prompted significant discussion across platforms including Twitter (subsequently renamed X). We examined a sample of Twitter postings (tweets) to gain insight into public perspectives and experiences.

METHODS

We harvested tweets posted or retweeted on 21-22 June 2021 which contained the search terms coil, intrauterine system, IUD or intrauterine. We analysed the dataset thematically and selected illustrative tweets with the authors' consent for publication.

RESULTS

Following deduplication and screening, we included 1431 tweets in our analysis. We identified testimonials with descriptions of varied pain experiences. Twitter users reported that clinicians had not warned them that pain could be severe or explained the options for pain relief. Some raised concerns about pain being minimised or dismissed and linked this to the management of women's pain in medicine more broadly. Twitter users described connecting to an online community with shared experiences as validating and used this as a springboard for collective action.

CONCLUSIONS

While we acknowledge the limitations of our sample, this study highlights important perspectives and accounts relating to pain during IUD procedures. Our findings attest to the need for strategies to improve the patient experience for those opting for IUD as a clinical priority. Further research should explore IUD users' experiences, expectations and wishes around pain management.

Pain management inequities by demographic and geriatric-related variables in older adult inpatients

BACKGROUND

Pain is ubiquitous, yet understudied. The objective of this study was to analyze inequities in pain assessment and management for hospitalized older adults focusing on demographic and geriatric-related variables.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from January 2013 through September 2021 of all adults 65 years or older on the general medicine service at UCSF Medical Center. Primary exposures included (1) demographic variables including race/ethnicity and limited English proficiency (LEP) status and (2) geriatric-related variables including age, dementia or mild cognitive impairment diagnosis, hearing or visual impairment, end-of-life care, and geriatrics consult involvement. Primary outcomes included (1) adjusted odds of numeric pain assessment versus other assessments and (2) adjusted opioids administered, measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

A total of 15,809 patients were included across 27,857 hospitalizations with 1,378,215 pain assessments, with a mean age of 77.8 years old. Patients were 47.4% White, 26.3% with LEP, 49.6% male, and 50.4% female. Asian (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.70-0.80), Latinx (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.99), and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93) patients had lower odds of a numeric assessment, compared with White patients. Patients with LEP (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.66-0.74) had lower odds of a numeric assessment, compared with English-speaking patients. Patients with dementia, hearing impairment, patients 75+, and at end-of-life were all less likely to receive a numeric assessment. Compared with White patients (86 MME, 95% CI 77-96), Asian patients (55 MME, 95% CI 46-65) received fewer opioids. Patients with LEP, dementia, hearing impairment and those 75+ years old also received significantly fewer opioids.

CONCLUSION

Older, hospitalized, general medicine patients from minoritized groups and with geriatric-related conditions are uniquely vulnerable to inequitable pain assessment and management. These findings raise concerns for pain underassessment and undertreatment.

Social Determinants and Consequences of Pain: Toward Multilevel, Intersectional, and Life Course Perspectives

Despite wide endorsement of a biopsychosocial framework for pain, social aspects of pain remain rarely addressed in the context of pain prevention and management. In this review, we aim to 1) examine the broad scope of social determinants and consequences of pain and their interactions across multiple levels of organization, and 2) provide a framework synthesizing existing concepts and potential areas for future work on social aspects of pain, drawing upon socioecological, intersectional, and life course approaches. Integrating interdisciplinary theory and evidence, we outline pathways through which multilevel social factors and pain may affect each other over time. We also provide a brief summary of intrapersonal aspects of pain, which are thought to operate at the interface between individuals and the social context. Progressing from micro- to macrolevel factors, we illustrate how social determinants of pain can directly or indirectly contribute to pain experiences, expression, risk, prognosis, and impact across populations. We consider 1) at the interpersonal level, the roles of social comparison, social relatedness, social support, social exclusion, empathy, and interpersonal conflict; 2) at the group or community level, the roles of intimacy groups, task groups, social categories, and loose associations; and 3) at the societal level, the roles of political, economic, and cultural systems, as well as their policies and practices. We present examples of multilevel consequences of pain across these levels and discuss opportunities to reduce the burden and inequities of pain by expanding multilevel social approaches in pain research and practice. PERSPECTIVE: Despite wide endorsement of a biopsychosocial framework for pain, social aspects of pain are often unclearly defined, hindering their use in pain prevention, management, and research. We summarize the scope of social aspects of pain and provide a framework synthesizing existing concepts and potential areas for future work.

The sociocultural context of adolescent pain: portrayals of pain in popular adolescent media

ABSTRACT

Research has consistently suggested that media consumption plays a vital role in children's socialization, including the socialization of painful experiences. Past research examining young children's popular media revealed worrisome trends in media depictions of pain; it consisted of narrow depictions of pain, gender stereotypes, and an overwhelming lack of empathy from observers, which could contribute to pain-related stigma. Research has not yet examined how pain is portrayed in adolescent media, despite adolescence being the developmental period when chronic pain often emerges. The current study extracted a cross-section of popular adolescent media selected based on popularity, including 10 movies and the first seasons of 6 TV shows. Pain instances were coded using 2 established observational coding schemes assessing sufferer pain characteristics and observer responses. Across 616 instances of pain, there was a preponderance of violence and injuries, whereas everyday, chronic-type, and medical/procedural pains were seldom represented. Individuals from marginalized (ie, gender diverse, girls) and minoritized groups (individuals with racialized identities) were underrepresented in pain instances. Furthermore, regardless of observed gender or "race," observers displayed a lack of empathy for sufferers and rarely engaged in prosocial behaviors. Popular media may serve as an agent of socialization in adolescence; thus, pain depictions may be a powerful force in propagating pain-related stigma and inequities. An opportunity exists to harness popular media to adaptively and accurately portray pain to adolescents.

Peer Victimization, Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, and Chronic Pain: A Longitudinal Examination

Chronic pain and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (PTSS) co-occur at high rates in youth and are linked to worse pain outcomes and quality of life. While peer victimization has been posited as a mechanism underlying the PTSS-pain relationship in youth, empirical evidence suggests that it may exacerbate both PTSS and pain. The present study aimed to longitudinally examine PTSS as a mediator in the relationship between peer victimization at baseline and pain-related outcomes at 3 months in youth with chronic pain. Participants included 182 youth aged 10 to 18 years recruited from a tertiary-level children's hospital in Western Canada. At baseline, participants completed measures to assess pain (intensity and interference), peer victimization (relational and overt), and PTSS. The pain was reassessed at a 3-month follow-up. Primary hypotheses were tested utilizing a series of mediation analyses with PTSS as a proposed mediator in the associations between peer victimization and pain outcomes. Youth PTSS mediated the relationship between higher baseline relational victimization and higher 3-month pain interference while controlling for baseline pain interference. Three-month pain intensity was not correlated with peer victimization; thus, pain intensity was not included in the analyses. These findings reveal that PTSS may be an underlying factor in the co-occurrence of peer victimization and chronic pain in youth. Further research is needed to better understand the role of peer victimization in the maintenance of chronic pain to ensure appropriate, effective, and timely interventions that address the social and mental health issues impacting the lives of these youth as well as their pain. PERSPECTIVE: PTSS may be an underlying factor in the co-occurrence between peer victimization and chronic pain in youth, highlighting the need to assess for both peer relationship problems and PTSS in youth with chronic pain.

Bystander Acknowledgment Mitigates the Psychological and Physiological Pain of Racial Discrimination for Black Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Racism increases pain sensitization and contributes to racialized pain inequities; however, research has not tested interventions targeting racism to reduce pain. In this study, we examined whether White bystanders can act to mitigate racism's pain-sensitizing effects. To simulate racial exclusion in the laboratory, Black young adults (age 18-30; N = 92) were randomly assigned to be included or excluded by White players in a ball-tossing game (Cyberball). For half of the excluded participants, White bystanders acknowledged and apologized for the racial exclusion. Participants completed a cold pressor task to assess pain threshold, tolerance, and unpleasantness, and completed a survey assessing psychological needs (ie, belongingness, self-esteem, meaningful existence, and self-control). Participants who experienced racial exclusion reported significantly more threatened psychological needs and increased laboratory pain sensitization (ie, lower pain threshold and tolerance) than those who were included. However, when a White bystander acknowledged the racism, excluded participants reported higher levels of self-control, self-esteem, and decreased pain sensitization (pain threshold and tolerance) relative to excluded participants whose experience was not acknowledged. Our findings support that racism increased Black people's pain sensitivity and provide initial evidence for White bystander acknowledgment as a health intervention. PERSPECTIVE: Continual exposure to racism likely contributes to inequities in pain sensitization. We demonstrate that acute exposure to mild racism increases acute pain sensitization. Results suggest that a bystander acknowledging witnessed racism can buffer the acute sensitizing effects of racism on pain, pointing to the potential of interpersonal interventions targeting racism. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06113926.

Documenting Race and Gender Biases in Pain Assessment and a Novel Intervention Designed to Reduce Biases

Disparities in pain care are well-documented such that women and people of color have their pain undertreated and underestimated compared to men and White people. One of the contributors of the undertreatment of pain for people of color and women may be the inaccurate assessment of pain. Understanding the pain assessment process is an important step in evaluating the magnitude of and intervening on pain disparities in care. In the current work, we focus on documenting intersectional race and gender biases in pain assessment and present the results of a novel intervention for reducing these biases. Across 3 studies (N = 532) and a mini meta-analysis using real videotaped people in pain as stimuli, we demonstrate that observers disproportionately underestimated women of color's pain compared to all other groups (men of color, White women, and White men). In study 3 (N = 232), we show that a novel intervention focused on behavioral skill building (ie, practice and immediate feedback) significantly reduced observers' pain assessment biases toward marginalized groups compared to all other types of trainings (raising awareness of societal biases, raising awareness of self-biases, and a control condition). While it is an open question as to how long this type of intervention lasts, behavioral skills building around assessing marginalized people's pain more accurately is a promising training tool for health care professionals. PERSPECTIVE: This article demonstrates the underestimation of pain among people of color and women. We also found support that a novel intervention reduced observers' pain assessment biases toward marginalized groups. This could be used in medical education or clinical care to reduce intersectional pain care disparities.

Through the Lens of Movement-Evoked Pain: A Theoretical Framework of the "Pain-Movement Interface" to Guide Research and Clinical Care for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions

Over 120 million Americans report experiencing pain in the past 3 months. Among these individuals, 50 million report chronic pain and 17 million report pain that limits daily life or work activities on most days (ie, high-impact chronic pain). Musculoskeletal pain conditions in particular are a major contributor to global disability, health care costs, and poor quality of life. Movement-evoked pain (MEP) is an important and distinct component of the musculoskeletal pain experience and represents an emerging area of study in pain and rehabilitation fields. This focus article proposes the "Pain-Movement Interface" as a theoretical framework of MEP that highlights the interface between MEP, pain interference, and activity engagement. The goal of the framework is to expand knowledge about MEP by guiding scientific inquiry into MEP-specific pathways to disability, high-risk clinical phenotypes, and underlying individual influences that may serve as treatment targets. This framework reinforces the dynamic nature of MEP within the context of activity engagement, participation in life and social roles, and the broader pain experience. Recommendations for MEP evaluation, encompassing the spectrum from high standardization to high patient specificity, and MEP-targeted treatments are provided. Overall, the proposed framework and recommendations reflect the current state of science in this emerging area of study and are intended to support future efforts to optimize musculoskeletal pain management and enhance patient outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: Movement-evoked pain (MEP) is a distinct component of the musculoskeletal pain experience and emerging research area. This article introduces the "Pain-Movement Interface" as a theoretical framework of MEP, highlighting the interface between MEP, pain interference, and activity engagement. Evaluating and treating MEP could improve rehabilitation approaches and enhance patient outcomes.

Sex concordance between physicians and patients and discharge opioid prescribing

Inpatient pain management is challenging for clinicians and inequities are prevalent. We examined sex concordance between physicians and patients to determine if discordance was associated with disparate opioid prescribing on hospital discharge. We examined 15,339 hospitalizations from 2013 to 2021. Adjusting for patient, clinical, and hospitalization-level characteristics, we calculated the odds of a patient receiving an opioid on discharge and the days of opioids prescribed across all hospitalizations and for patients admitted with a common pain diagnosis. We did not find an overall association between physician-patient sex concordance and discharge opioid prescriptions. Compared to concordant sex pairs, patients in discordant pairs were not significantly less likely to receive an opioid prescription (odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95, 1.15) and did not receive significantly fewer days of opioids (2.1 fewer days of opioids; 95% CI: -4.4, 0.4). Better understanding relationships between physician and patient characteristics is essential to achieve more equitable prescribing.

Hierarchical Clustering Applied to Chronic Pain Drawings Identifies Undiagnosed Fibromyalgia: Implications for Busy Clinical Practice

Currently-used assessments for fibromyalgia require clinicians to suspect a fibromyalgia diagnosis, a process susceptible to unintentional bias. Automated assessments of standard patient-reported outcomes (PROs) could be used to prompt formal assessments, potentially reducing bias. We sought to determine whether hierarchical clustering of patient-reported pain distribution on digital body map drawings predicted fibromyalgia diagnosis. Using an observational cohort from the University of Pittsburgh's Patient Outcomes Repository for Treatment registry, which contains PROs and electronic medical record data from 21,423 patients (March 17, 2016-June 25, 2019) presenting to pain management clinics, we tested the hypothesis that hierarchical clustering subgroup was associated with fibromyalgia diagnosis, as determined by ICD-10 code. Logistic regression revealed a significant relationship between the body map cluster subgroup and fibromyalgia diagnosis. The cluster subgroup with the most body areas selected was the most likely to receive a diagnosis of fibromyalgia when controlling for age, gender, anxiety, and depression. Despite this, more than two-thirds of patients in this cluster lacked a clinical fibromyalgia diagnosis. In an exploratory analysis to better understand this apparent underdiagnosis, we developed and applied proxies of fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. We found that proxy diagnoses were more common than ICD-10 diagnoses, which may be due to less frequent clinical fibromyalgia diagnosis in men. Overall, we find evidence of fibromyalgia underdiagnosis, likely due to gender bias. Coupling PROs that take seconds to complete, such as a digital pain body map, with machine learning is a promising strategy to reduce bias in fibromyalgia diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: This investigation applies hierarchical clustering to patient-reported, digital pain body maps, finding an association between body map responses and clinical fibromyalgia diagnosis. Rapid, computer-assisted interpretation of pain body maps would be clinically useful in prompting more detailed assessments for fibromyalgia, potentially reducing gender bias.

Treatment Goals and Preferences of Black Veterans with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain

Understanding patient goals and preferences is critical in the context of complex conditions such as chronic pain. This need may be especially pronounced for Black patients, who experience significant health and healthcare disparities. The primary aim of this study was to describe the treatment goals and preferences of Black veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain who were enrolled in the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial testing a coaching intervention. In the coaching sessions, participants (n = 106) identified their most important pain-related treatment goals and preferences. Participants' top treatment goals were to improve physical functioning (61%), increase engagement in valued activities (45%), and reduce pain intensity (37%). Most participants (73%) preferred non-pharmacological treatments (eg, physical therapy, exercise, acupuncture, yoga). The 17% of participants who identified medications as a preferred treatment demonstrated higher levels of depression and anxiety compared to those who did not. Approximately 42% and 21% of participants stated a preference to avoid pharmacological and surgical pain treatments, respectively. Black patients with chronic pain prioritize improving physical functioning and pain intensity in service of increasing their engagement in exercise, work, relationships, and leisure activities. Also, in the current study, patients expressed a clear preference for non-pharmacological pain treatments. Future research should investigate ways to improve communication of goals and preferences with providers and facilitate access to non-pharmacological treatments for Black patients with chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article describes the treatment goals and preferences of Black veterans with chronic pain. Most patients prioritized goals to improve physical functioning, pain severity, and participation in valued activities. Patients primarily preferred non-pharmacological treatments. This emphasizes the need for clear communication with Black patients regarding pain-related goals and non-pharmacological treatment options.

Prevalence of Chronic Pain by Immigration Status and Latino Ethnicity

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the Latino paradox and healthy migrant hypotheses by estimating the association between the prevalence of chronic pain, immigration status, and Latino ethnicity.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study analyzed pooled data from 85,395 adult participants of the 2019-2021 National Health Interview Survey. The dependent variables were any pain and chronic pain in the past 3 months. The independent variables were immigration status (US born, naturalized citizen, non-citizen) and Latino ethnicity.

RESULTS

Chronic pain was prevalent for nearly a quarter of US born non-Latino adults (24%) and non-citizen non-Latino adults had the lowest prevalence at 8%. In multivariable adjusted models, US born non-Latino immigration status and ethnicity was associated with a higher probability of reporting chronic pain in the last 3 months compared to US born Latino adults (-3.0%; 95% CI = -4.4%, -1.6%), naturalized citizen non-Latino adults (-4.7%; 95% CI = -5.9%, -3.4%), naturalized citizen Latino adults (-6.7%; 95% CI = -8.5%, -4.9%), non-citizen non-Latino adults (-3.1%; 95% CI = -4.7%, -1.5%), and non-citizen Latino adults (-8.9%; 95% CI = -10.8%, -7.0%).

CONCLUSION

US Born non-Latino adults reported the highest prevalence of chronic pain and non-citizen Latino adults reported the lowest prevalence of chronic pain providing support for the Latino paradox and healthy migrant effect hypotheses.

The intersection of pediatric anesthesiology and social determinants of health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is increasing evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric perioperative care, which indicates a need to identify factors driving disparities. Social determinants of health (SDOH) play a fundamental role in pediatric health and are recognized as key underlying mechanisms of healthcare inequities. This article summarizes recent research exploring the influence of SDOH on pediatric perioperative outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the scarcity of research exploring SDOH and pediatric perioperative outcomes, recent work demonstrates an association between SDOH and multiple outcomes across the perioperative care continuum. Measures of social disadvantage were associated with preoperative symptom severity, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of postoperative complications and mortality. In some studies, these adverse effects of social disadvantage persisted even when controlling for medical comorbidities and clinical severity.

SUMMARY

The existing literature offers compelling evidence of the impact of SDOH on perioperative outcomes in children and reveals a critical area in pediatric anesthesia that necessitates further exploration and action. To improve outcomes and address care inequities, future efforts should prioritize the integration of SDOH assessment into pediatric perioperative research and practice.

Reframing pain: the power of individual and societal factors to enhance pain treatment

The effectiveness of analgesics can be increased if synergistic behavioural, psychological, and pharmacological interventions are provided within a supportive environment.

Broadening the Scope of Resilience in Chronic Pain: Methods, Social Context, and Development

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A wellspring of new research has offered varying models of resilience in chronic pain populations; however, resilience is a multifaceted and occasionally nebulous construct. The current review explores definitional and methodological issues in existing observational and clinical studies and offers new directions for future studies of pain resilience.

RECENT FINDINGS

Definitions of pain resilience have historically relied heavily upon self-report and from relatively narrow scientific domains (e.g., positive psychology) and in narrow demographic groups (i.e., Caucasian, affluent, or highly educated adults). Meta-analytic and systematic reviews have noted moderate overall quality of resilience-focused assessment and treatment in chronic pain, which may be attributable to these narrow definitions. Integration of research from affiliated fields (developmental models, neuroimaging, research on historically underrepresented groups, trauma psychology) has the potential to enrich current models of pain resilience and ultimately improve the empirical and clinical utility of resilience models in chronic pain.

Communication and Activation in Pain to Enhance Relationships and Treat Pain with Equity (COOPERATE): a Qualitative Analysis of a Tailored Coaching Program for Black Patients with Chronic Pain

BACKGROUND

Racial inequities in pain treatment are well-documented and persist despite national priorities focused on health equity. The COOPERATE (Communication and Activation in Pain to Enhance Relationships and Treat Pain with Equity) intervention was a patient-centered, tailored intervention aimed at improving health equity by targeting patient activation-the knowledge and confidence to manage one's health. COOPERATE led to significant and sustained increases in patient activation, significant short-term increases in communication self-efficacy (confidence to communicate with clinicians), and more intervention participants experienced clinically significant (≥ 30%) reductions in pain at 3 months than control group participants.

OBJECTIVE

To understand how participants experienced the intervention, including their perspectives on its effects on their health and healthcare experiences.

DESIGN

Semi-structured qualitative interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

Black veterans with chronic pain who participated in the COOPERATE intervention.

KEY RESULTS

Participants described acquiring new tools and cultivating skills to use in their clinic visits, including preparing for their visit (writing an agenda, listing questions); asking focused, effective questions; and expressing concerns and communicating goals, values, and preferences. Participants indicated that by putting these tools to use, they felt more confident and able to take ownership of their own pain care; for some, this led to better pain management and improved pain. Participants expressed mixed views of disparities in pain care, with some believing race and racism did not play a role in their care, while others valued being part of an intervention that helped equip them with tools to exercise autonomy over their healthcare.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients with chronic pain described gaining greater confidence to self-manage and communicate with their clinicians after participating in the COOPERATE intervention. With its focus on empowering individuals, the COOPERATE intervention represents a promising approach to help advance equity in pain care.

Communication and activation in pain to enhance relationships and treat pain with equity (COOPERATE): a randomized clinical trial

ABSTRACT

Racialized disparities in chronic pain care are well-documented and persist despite national priorities focused on health equity. Similar disparities have been observed in patient activation (ie, having the knowledge, confidence, and skills to manage one's health). As such, interventions targeting patient activation represent a novel approach to addressing and reducing disparities in pain care. Communication and Activation in Pain to Enhance Relationships and Treat Pain with Equity is a randomized controlled trial of a 6-session telephone-delivered intervention to increase patient activation for Black patients with chronic pain. Two hundred fifty Black patients from a Midwestern Veterans Affairs medical center were randomized to the intervention or attention control. The primary outcome was patient activation; secondary outcomes included communication self-efficacy, pain, and psychological functioning. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at 3 (primary endpoint), 6, and 9 months (sustained effects). Analyses used an intent-to-treat approach. Compared with baseline, patient activation increased 4.6 points at 3 months (versus +0.13 in control group, 95% CI: 0.48, 7.34; P = 0.03). These improvements in the intervention group were sustained, with +7 from baseline at 6 months and +5.77 at 9 months, and remained statistically significant from the control group. Communication self-efficacy increased significantly relative to the control group from baseline to 3 months. Pain intensity and interference improved at 3 months, but differences were not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Most other secondary outcomes improved, but group differences were not statistically significant after controlling for multiple comparisons. Results suggest that increasing patient activation is a potentially fruitful path toward improving pain management and achieving health equity.

The oral administration of Lotus corniculatus L. attenuates acute and chronic pain models in male rats

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Lotus corniculatus L. (Fabaceae) traditionally used in Persian folk medicine to heal peritoneal inflammation and back pain.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To explore the antinociceptive (acute pain) and anti-neuropathic (chronic pain) activities of Lotus corniculatus leaves essential oil (LCEO) in addition to uncovering the possible mechanisms of antinociception.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LCEO as well as the pure oleanolic acid (OA) compound, were assayed for their effects on acute (formalin induced paw licking test or FIPT) and chronic (cervical contusion injury models on the fifth cervical vertebra or CCS; 14-day intervals) pain. The possible involvements of NO-cGMP-K+ channel, TRPV, dopamine, cannabinoid, PPAR, adrenergic, and opioid mechanisms in the antinociceptive activity of LCEO have studied by formalin test. The levels of p53 and inflammatory markers were measured using a streptavidin biotin immune peroxidase complex and ELISA methods, respectively.

RESULTS

The LCEO and OA exerted antinociceptive activity in the first-phase of FIPT. Pretreatment with antagonists of TRPV1, dopamine D2, cannabinoid type1 and 2, and NO-cGMP-K+ channel blockers (glibenclamide, L-NAME and methylene blue) attenuated the antinociceptive effect of LCEO in FIPT. In addition, LCEO and OA meaningfully reduced hyperalgesia (days 6-14) and mechanical allodynia (days 2-14) in the CCS model. LCEO suppressed the apoptotic marker (p53) in CCS model and also ameliorated IL-2, TNF-α, and IL-1 in the spinal cord.

CONCLUSION

Finally, LCEO inhibited acute (possibly via the modulation of opioid, TRPV, dopamine, cannabinoid mechanisms as well as NO-cGMP-K+ channel) and chronic pain (via suppressing apoptotic and inflammatory markers) in male rats. The results also suggest that OA has analgesic activity against acute and chronic pain conditions.

A Narrative Review of the Current Research in Cancer-Related Pain Inequities: The Necessity of Applying Intersectionality to Advance Cancer Pain Research

Cancer-related pain has a significant impact on quality of life for patients with cancer. In populations without cancer, there are documented pain inequities associated with minoritized racial and/or ethnic groups, women, and low socioeconomic status. However, our understanding of pain inequities specifically among patients with cancer remains incomplete. We narratively synthesized published quantitative research on cancer-related pain inequities in the US in the past decade. A search identified 17 English-language articles examining pain for patients with various cancer types at different treatment stages. Our review revealed mixed findings comparing cancer-related pain by racial group (e.g., Black vs White) and sex (male vs female), but consistent findings indicating that people with lower (vs higher) socioeconomic status and younger (vs older) patients report more cancer-related pain. Research on cancer pain among sexual and gender minorities remains scant. Key research gaps include a need for more research that incorporates an intersectional perspective by exploring intersecting subgroups and measuring social and structural processes that drive pain inequities. These findings underscore an important need for researchers to use an intersectional approach to cancer pain to help elucidate key populations at-risk for exacerbated cancer-related pain and identify ways to mitigate social and structural processes that drive these inequities.

The Association Between Racialized Discrimination in Health Care and Pain Among Black Patients With Mental Health Diagnoses

Chronic pain is a costly and debilitating problem in the United States, and its burdens are exacerbated among socially disadvantaged and stigmatized groups. In a cross-sectional study of Black Veterans with chronic pain at the Atlanta VA Health Care System (N = 380), we used path analysis to explore the roles of racialized discrimination in health care settings, pain self-efficacy, and pain-related fear avoidance beliefs as potential mediators of pain outcomes among Black Veterans with and without an electronic health record-documented mental health diagnosis. In unadjusted bivariate analyses, Black Veterans with a mental health diagnosis (n = 175) reported marginally higher levels of pain-related disability and significantly higher levels of pain interference compared to those without a mental health diagnosis (n = 205). Path analyses revealed that pain-related disability, pain intensity, and pain interference were mediated by higher levels of racialized discrimination in health care and lower pain self-efficacy among Black Veterans with a mental health diagnosis. Pain-related fear avoidance beliefs did not mediate pain outcomes. These findings highlight the need to improve the quality and effectiveness of health care for Black patients with chronic pain through the implementation of antiracism interventions within health care systems. Results further suggest that Black patients with chronic pain who have a mental health diagnosis may benefit from targeted pain management strategies that focus on building self-efficacy for managing pain. PERSPECTIVE: Racialized health care discrimination and pain self-efficacy mediated differences in pain-related disability, pain intensity, and pain interference among Black Veterans with and without a mental health diagnosis. Findings highlight the need for antiracism interventions within health care systems in order to improve the quality of care for Black patients with chronic pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01983228.

Race, Ethnicity, and Belief in a Just World: Implications for Chronic Pain Acceptance Among Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain

Chronic pain acceptance is a psychological process consistently linked with improved functional outcomes. However, existing research on this construct has not considered the role of racial or ethnic background, despite growing evidence of racialized disparities in pain experience and treatment. This study aimed to examine racial differences in chronic pain acceptance, as measured by the chronic pain acceptance questionnaires (CPAQ), in a multicultural sample of individuals with chronic low back pain (N = 137-37.2% White, 31.4% Hispanic, and 31.4% Black/African American). We further sought to examine moderating effects of discrimination, pain-related perceived injustice (PI), and just world belief (JWB). Analyses consisted of cross-sectional one-way analyses of variance with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparisons, followed by regression models with interaction terms, main effects, and relevant covariates. Results indicated higher scores on the CPAQ for White individuals compared to Black or Hispanic individuals. Significant interactions were noted between race/ethnicity and JWB in predicting pain acceptance, after controlling for demographic and pain-related variables, such that the positive association between JWB and pain acceptance was significant for White participants only. Race/ethnicity did not show significant interactions with PI or prior racial discrimination. Findings highlight racial differences in levels of chronic pain acceptance, an adaptive pain coping response, and a stronger JWB appears to have a positive impact on pain acceptance for White individuals only. Results further confirm that members of disadvantaged racial groups may be more susceptible to poorer pain adjustment, which is the result of complex, multi-level factors. PERSPECTIVE: This study identifies racial differences in levels of pain acceptance, an adaptive psychological response to chronic pain, such that White individuals with chronic low back pain demonstrate higher levels of pain acceptance. The article further explores the impacts of intrapersonal and sociocultural variables on racial differences in pain acceptance.

The social context of burning mouth syndrome: an exploratory pilot study of stigma, discrimination, and pain

BACKGROUND

The social context of burning mouth syndrome (BMS) has received little attention in the scientific literature. However, social psychological theory and insights from those with lived experiences suggest that people living with BMS experience compounding effects of stigma related to their pain, diagnosis (or lack thereof), and intersectional identities.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to provide initial evidence and to motivate new directions for research on BMS. Here, we present the results of an exploratory pilot study (n = 16) of women living with BMS in the United States.

METHODS

Participants completed self-report measures of stigma, discrimination, and pain, as well as laboratory assessments of pain through quantitative sensory testing.

RESULTS

Results indicate a high prevalence of internalized BMS stigma, experience of BMS-related discrimination from clinicians, and gender stigma consciousness in this population. Moreover, results provide initial evidence that these experiences are related to pain outcomes. The most robust pattern of findings is that internalized BMS stigma was related to greater clinical pain severity, interference, intensity, and unpleasantness.

CONCLUSION

Given the prevalence and pain-relevance of intersectional stigma and discrimination identified in this pilot study, lived experience and social context should be incorporated into future research on BMS.

A progressive agenda toward equity in pain care

Background: There are inconsistencies documenting the pain experience of Black adults and other racially minoritized populations. Often disregarded, pain among these groups is characterized by misconceptions, biases, and discriminatory practices, which may lead to inequitable pain care. Methods: To address this issue, this professional commentary provides an overview of pain reform and the need to declare chronic pain as a critical public health issue, while requiring that equity be a key focus in providing comprehensive pain screening and standardizing epidemiological surveillance to understand the prevalence and incidence of pain. Results and Conclusions: This roadmap is a call to action for all sectors of research, practice, policy, education, and advocacy. More importantly, this progressive agenda is timely for all race and other marginalized groups and reminds us that adequate treatment of pain is an obligation that cannot be the responsibility of one person, community, or institution, but rather a collective responsibility of those willing to service the needs of all individuals.

Regional vs global physical therapy interventions to treat chronic pain in survivors of trauma: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

A history of traumatic life events is associated with chronic pain in later life. Physical therapists utilize a variety of methods to treat pain, however, they have struggled to find effective interventions to improve patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare impairment-based, regional (REGION-PT) physical therapy (PT) to a global (GLOBAL-PT) model consisting of pain neuroscience education, graded motor imagery, and exercise for adults with chronic pain and history of trauma.

DESIGN

Randomized Controlled Trial.

METHODS

Adults ≥ 18 years of age with chronic pain and a history of ≥1 trauma identified through the Life Events Checklist received the allocated intervention once a week for six weeks. Treatment effects were assessed using linear mixed models.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight participants completed the trial. There were no difference in outcomes between groups. There were significant interactions between race and intervention. Both interventions were associated with improvements in pain interference for white participants, but non-white participants experienced improvement only with GLOBAL-PT. Regardless of allocation, participants improved in physical function, six of the PROMIS-29 domains, and in pain interference measures.

CONCLUSION

Both interventions are reasonable strategies for individuals with chronic pain and a history of trauma.

The intersection of drug use discrimination and racial discrimination in the management of chronic non-cancer pain in United States primary care safety-net clinics: Implications for healthcare system and clinic-level changes

BACKGROUND

Clinicians' bias related to patients' race and substance use history play a role in pain management. However, patients' or clinicians' understandings about discriminatory practices and the structural factors that contribute to and exacerbate these practices are underexamined. We report on perceptions of discrimination from the perspectives of patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) and a history of substance use and their clinicians within the structural landscape of reductions in opioid prescribing in the United States.

METHODS

We interviewed 46 clinicians and 94 patients, using semi-structured interview guides, from eight safety-net primary care clinics across the San Francisco Bay Area from 2013 to 2020. We used a modified grounded theory approach to code and analyze transcripts.

RESULTS

Clinicians discussed using opioid prescribing guidelines with the goals of increased opioid safety and reduced bias in patient monitoring. While patients acknowledged the validity of clinicians' concerns about opioid safety, they indicated that clinicians made assumptions about opioid misuse towards Black patients and patients suspected of substance use. Clinicians discussed evidence of discrimination in opioid prescribing at the clinic-wide level; racialized stereotypes about patients likely to misuse opioids; and their own struggles to overcome discriminatory practices regarding CNCP management.

CONCLUSION

While clinicians and patients acknowledged opioid safety concerns, the practical application of opioid prescribing guidelines impacted how patients perceived and engaged with CNCP care particularly for patients who are Black and/or report a history of substance use. We recommend healthcare system and clinic-level interventions that may remediate discriminatory practices and associated disparities.