Intraindividual and Interindividual Variability of Olanzapine Trough Concentrations in Patients Treated With the Long-Acting Injectable Formulation

Association between olanzapine plasma concentrations and treatment response: A systematic review, meta-analysis and individual participant data meta-analysis

AIMS

By meta-analysing pooled studies and available individual participant data, we aim to provide new insight on olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring in schizophrenia.

METHOD

We conducted a computerized search of bibliographic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane library, Web of Science and PsycINFO) to identify studies that assessed the relationship between olanzapine plasma concentration and the change in patients' clinical scores. We investigated this relationship with olanzapine plasma level 12h00 post-intake using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

7 studies were included in the pooled data analysis (781 patients). We found no difference in oral dose between responders and non-responders but a significantly higher concentration of 4.50 µg/L in responders (p < 0.01). Olanzapine concentration above the thresholds identified in each study was associated with response (odd ratio = 3.50, p = 0.0007). We identified that non-responder patients showed greater inter-individual variability than responders. In the individual data analysis (159 patients), we found no relationship between dose and clinical response but an association between plasma level and response in the shape of a parabolic curve. The Receiver Operating Characteristic curve found a threshold of 22.07 µg/L to identify responders (96% sensitivity, 86% specificity) and a threshold of 56.47 µg/L to identify a decreased probability of response.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to oral dose, our work confirmed that plasma olanzapine levels are associated with clinical response and should therefore be used to optimise treatment. We determined a treatment response threshold of 22.07 µg/L and suggest that a concentration above the therapeutic window may result in a decreased response.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics as a Predictor of Relapse in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A 1-Year Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have been shown to reduce acute episodes of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). However, breakthrough relapses are frequent, possibly because of underdosing in clinical practice. In this framework, the advantages of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be overlooked. This study explored the association of low steady-state LAI levels with a higher risk of relapse in SSDs, despite the use of a licensed posology.

METHODS

Forty-eight clinically stable outpatients with SSD underwent LAI-TDM using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for routine observational purposes. Baseline anamnestic, pharmacological, and psychometric evaluations compared subjects with "under-range" versus "in-range" LAI serum levels; between-group comparisons for different LAI treatments were also performed. A binary logistic regression explored which baseline factors (age, sex, previous hospitalizations, psychopathology, specific LAI treatment, and underrange serum levels) predicted relapse during the next 12 months.

RESULTS

Baseline comparisons did not show significant between-group differences, except for a higher percentage of underrange values in individuals receiving olanzapine pamoate. A total of 10 patients (20.8%) relapsed during the follow-up; only underrange LAI levels predicted the event (odds ratio 0.03, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.36; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Even if relapse remains as a multifactorial event, LAI-TDM may identify subjects at risk for this negative outcome, thus optimizing antipsychotic maintenance treatment in the context of precision medicine. The finding of underrange LAI plasma levels in real-world practice should prompt adequate monitoring of clinically stable outpatients to identify the early signs of psychopathological deterioration.

Impact of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antiretroviral Drugs in Routine Clinical Management of People Living With HIV: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

The treatment of HIV infection has evolved significantly since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. As a result, a response rate of 90%-95% now represents a realistically achievable target. Given this background, it is difficult to imagine the additional benefits that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could provide in the management of HIV infection.

METHODS

This article is not intended to provide a systematic literature review on TDM of antiretroviral agents; rather, the authors aim to discuss the potential added value of TDM in the optimal management of people living with HIV (PLWH) in selected real-life clinical scenarios based on data collected over 10 years by their TDM service.

RESULTS

Some clinical situations, in which the selection of the optimal antiretroviral therapy is challenging, have been identified. These include poorly compliant patients, suboptimal antiretroviral therapies (in terms of both efficacy and toxicity), polypharmacy with a high risk of drug-drug interactions, and different patient populations, such as pregnant women.

CONCLUSIONS

The transformation of HIV infection from a near-universally fatal illness to a lifelong chronic disease has resulted in an HIV population that is growing and aging, placing new and increasing demands on public programs and health services. Increasingly, the management of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and drug-drug interaction, and their impact on antiretroviral therapy will have to be undertaken. These clinical settings represent some of the new frontiers for the use of TDM with the goal of achieving optimal prescription and outcome for PLWH.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Drugs

BACKGROUND

The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide treatment with long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, which are increasingly prescribed, remains a matter of debate. The aim of this review was to provide a practical framework for the integration of TDM when switching from an oral formulation to the LAI counterpart, and in maintenance treatment.

METHODS

The authors critically reviewed 3 types of data: (1) positron emission tomography data evaluating dopamine (D2/D3) receptor occupancy related to antipsychotic concentrations in serum or plasma; D2/D3 receptors are embraced as target sites in the brain for antipsychotic efficacy and tolerability, (2) pharmacokinetic studies evaluating the switch from oral to LAI antipsychotics, and (3) pharmacokinetic data for LAI formulations. Based on these data, indications for TDM and therapeutic reference ranges were considered for LAI antipsychotics.

RESULTS

Antipsychotic concentrations in blood exhibited interindividual variability not only under oral but also under LAI formulations because these concentrations are affected by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, genetic peculiarities, and clinical variables, including comedications and comorbidities. Reported data combined with positron emission tomography evidence indicated a trend toward lower concentrations under LAI administration than under oral medications. However, the available evidence is insufficient to recommend LAI-specific therapeutic reference ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Although TDM evidence for newer LAI formulations is limited, this review suggests the use of TDM when switching an antipsychotic from oral to its LAI formulation. The application of TDM practice is more accurate for dose selection than the use of dose equivalents as it accounts more precisely for individual characteristics.

Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetics of antipsychotics and antidepressants in real life settings: A 5-year single centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Exposure and clinical response to CNS drugs are largely variable. AGNP guidelines suggest therapy individualisation with therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma concentrations and pharmacogenetic testing. We present the retrospective analysis of the last 5 years' data collected in real life settings as indirect evidence of the applications of the AGNP guidelines in the routine clinical management of psychiatric patients requiring pharmacologic treatments.

METHODS

Plasma concentrations were quantified using a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. Genomic DNA was isolated using an automatic DNA extraction system. All genotypes were determined by Real-Time PCR.

RESULTS

We collected a total of 4582 requests for TDM and 212 requests for pharmacogenetic analysis. A wide distribution in the trough concentrations was observed for most drugs indicating a high interpatient variability. Nearly 45% of the samples had trough levels below the minimum effective drug concentrations set by the AGNP guidelines; only 8% of the samples had high concentrations. For pharmacogenetics analysis, among antipsychotics, clozapine, haloperidol and aripiprazole were the most requested (78%); while for antidepressants SSRIs were the most frequently prescribed.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that physicians are becoming more confident with the laboratory pharmacologic tools to optimise treatments and/or that the pharmacological treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders is becoming more challenging. TDM and PGx might significantly contribute to the rational selection of the best drug and best dose in individual cases.

Paliperidone LAI and Aripiprazole LAI Plasma Level Monitoring in the Prophylaxis of Bipolar Disorder Type I with Manic Predominance

Introduction The objective of this study was the evaluation of utility of plasma level monitoring in the clinical stabilizing efficacy and tolerability of paliperidone palmitate (PP) vs. aripiprazole monohydrate (AM) in bipolar disorder I (BD I) with manic predominance.

Methods Fifty-six outpatients of both sexes, age ranging from 18 to 65 years, affected by BD I with manic predominance, orally treated and stabilized after acute episode for at least 2 weeks with paliperidone or aripiprazole (n=31, paliperidone; n=25, aripiprazole) underwent a prospective observational study of switching to the corresponding long-acting injection (LAI) on the basis of clinical evaluation. The efficacy and tolerability of the 2 treatments were assessed by BPRS, PANSS, HAMD21, and MRS rating scales and a check list every month for 12 months. Drug plasma levels determinations (PLs) were performed at the same times.

Results A good clinical stability and tolerability of both drugs were reported. Lower mean PLs of PP showed a positive effect on depressive symptoms. AM PLs variability was associated with greater instability of manic symptoms whereas intermediate PLs seem to have more influence on depressive symptomatology.

Discussion PLs drug monitoring has been proven to be useful, and further investigations to identify optimal therapeutic ranges for LAI formulations are needed.

A review of a recently published guidelines' "strong recommendation" for therapeutic drug monitoring of olanzapine, haloperidol, perphenazine, and fluphenazine

Introduction

In addition to clozapine, there is a growing body of evidence that supports therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for additional antipsychotics commonly used in the United States.

Methods

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) published TDM guidelines for several psychiatric medications. Sources were identified that the authors used to establish therapeutic reference ranges for haloperidol, fluphenazine, perphenazine, and olanzapine-4 antipsychotics commonly used in the United States with a "strong recommendation" for TDM. The sources were then reviewed for content and appropriateness for utilization in establishing the reference ranges.

Results

Olanzapine had 15 citations, haloperidol had 9, perphenazine had 4, and fluphenazine had 2. The studies' methods were reviewed along with the proposed therapeutic reference ranges.

Discussion

Several limitations of the guidelines were identified. Reference ranges were suggested based on studies of patients with various diagnoses; some patients had an acute exacerbation, and others were in a maintenance phase. An additional publication was identified that reviewed similar (and additional) TDM studies; those conclusions were in slight contrast with those of the AGNP guidelines. In the future, guidance should be given to those looking to conduct TDM studies to standardize methods and make meta-analysis of this data more feasible.

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Some Novel Thiophene-bearing Quinazoline Derivatives as EGFR Inhibitors

Background:

With the approval of gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib for clinical use, targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) has been intensively pursued. Similar to most therapies, challenges related to the treatment resistance against these drugs have emerged over time, so new EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) need to be developed. This study aimed to investigate the potential use of a series of thiophene-bearing quinazoline derivatives as EGFR inhibitors. We designed and synthesized nine quinazolin derivatives, among which five compounds (5e, 5f, 5g, 5h, and 5i) were reported for the first time. </P><P> Methods: Two cancer cell lines, A431 (overexpressing EGFR) and A549 (EGFR wild-type and Kras mutation), were treated by these compounds and subjected to MTT assay. The A431 cells were selected for further treatment (5e) and Western blot analysis.

Results:

Although the compounds exerted no obvious effects on the proliferation of A549 cells, seven out of the nine compounds significantly inhibited the growth of A431 cells. In particular, the IC50 values of 5e and erlotinib were nearly equal. Western blot results showed that 5e significantly inhibited EGFR autophosphorylation in A431 cells. Structure-activity relationships indicated that quinazolines bearing 6,7-side chains were more potent than those unsubstituted at the 6,7-positions. Moreover, electron-withdrawing hydrophobic groups on the 5-position of the thiophene were preferred, such as chlorine or bromine atom.

Conclusion:

Nine 4-aminoquinazolin derivatives were designed, synthesized, and evaluated against A431 and A549 cell lines. Seven compounds significantly inhibited the growth of A431 cells. In particular, 5e possessed similar antitumor potency to that of erlotinib.