Non-small-cell lung cancer after breast cancer: a population-based study of clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes in 3529 women. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:1081-1090. [PMID: 25157761 DOI: 10.1097/jto.0000000000000213]

Diagnostic challenge and survival analysis of pulmonary oligometastases and primary lung cancer in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare breast cancer patients with pulmonary oligometastases (POM) and primary lung cancer (PLC) and to assess whether there were differences in clinical features, CT features, and survival outcomes between the two groups.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2021, the clinical records of 437 with malignant pulmonary nodules who had breast cancer patients were reviewed. POM was identified in 45 patients and PLC in 43 patients after the initial detection of pulmonary nodules. The clinicopathological characteristics, CT appearance of pulmonary nodules, and survival of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Stage II to IV breast tumors (p < 0.001), high pathological grade of breast cancer (p = 0.001), low proportion of luminal-type breast cancer (p = 0.003), and the higher serum CYFRA 21-1 level (p = 0.046) were the clinical characteristics of pulmonary nodules suggestive of POM rather than PLC. The CT features of lung nodules indicative of PLC rather than POM were the subsolid component (p < 0.001), lobulation (p = 0.010), air bronchogram (p < 0.001) and pleural indentation (p = 0.004). Ten-year survival rate for PLC was 93.2%, which was higher compared with 57.8% in those with POM (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated serum CYFRA 21-1 levels and late-stage breast cancer may be beneficial for the diagnosis of POM. CT imaging appearances of the subsolid component, lobulation, air bronchogram, and pleural indentation increase the likelihood of PLC. Breast cancer patients with PLC presented better survival with attentive monitoring than those with POM.

Development of a Second Primary Lung Cancer Following a Primary Breast Cancer: A Case Series

Breast cancer (BC) accounts for 24.2% of all women's malignant tumors, with rising survival rates due to advancements in chemotherapy and targeted treatments. However, second primary cancers, particularly lung cancer (LC), have become more prevalent, often emerging approximately 10 years after BC treatment. This study presents a case series of 9 women diagnosed with second primary LC following BC, treated at a high-complexity hospital in Colombia between 2014 and 2019. All initial BCs were ductal carcinomas, 7 were triple negative, 1 was human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive, and 1 was estrogen and progesterone positive. Each patient had undergone radiation therapy, and 7 had received chemotherapy, increasing their LC risk. The second primary LCs, all adenocarcinomas, were confirmed using immunohistochemical stains for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), Napsin A, and estrogen receptor (ER) status. The interval between treatments and LC detection ranged from 1 to 17 years, with 4 cases identified after 10 years and 3 within 1 to 3 years, underscoring the need for prolonged surveillance. Seven LCs were ipsilateral to the BC and radiation site, while 2 were contralateral, highlighting the necessity of monitoring both sides for potential LC development. This case series enhances the local epidemiological understanding, showing that prior radiotherapy for BC and histological analysis are key in characterizing second primary LC patients. The study emphasizes the critical role of accurate histological diagnosis in guiding treatment approaches for lung lesions in BC survivors.

Characteristics of Patients With Second Primary Lung Cancer Following Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Descriptive Study

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common noncutaneous malignancy in women and survivors are at an increased risk for secondary malignancy with lung cancer (LC) being the most common. There are few studies that have explored the clinicopathological specifics of LC in BC survivors.

METHODS

In this single-institution, retrospective study, we identified BC survivors who subsequently developed LC, examined their breast and LC clinical and pathological characteristics and compared them to the general BC and LC population as published in the literature.

RESULTS

In our study, we found the following associations that could be meaningful: an association between receiving radiation (RT) and LC (including a statistically significant P = .03 chance of ipsilateral LC after BC treatment with RT), a higher incidence and amount of smoking and LC, high BRCA positivity (78.9%) in the few patients who had germline testing, and a higher incidence of EGFR mutations in NSCLC after BC (60.9%) as well as an earlier stage of NSCLC disease.

CONCLUSION

Treatments such as RT, genetic factors such as BRCA mutations, and tobacco use may increase the risk of developing LC amongst BC survivors. Exploring this further can potentially lead to better risk stratification through modified low-dose CT chest screening protocols to catch LCs earlier and ultimately improve outcomes. Past studies have shown that BC survivors who are subsequently diagnosed with NSCLC may have improved OS compared with primary NSCLC and our study showed a high incidence of EGFR mutated NSCLC, which also suggest both improved prognosis and a different molecular profile of NSCLC, which warrants further investigation. Lastly, BC survivors who subsequently are diagnosed with NSCLC had earlier stage disease in our study, perhaps a result of surveillance, highlighting the importance of close monitoring of BC survivors.

Impact of previous extra-pulmonary malignancies on surgical outcomes of sequential primary non-small cell lung cancer

Reduced cancer deaths have led to an increase in the number of cancer survivors and the risk of the second primary tumor. This study explored the surgical outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer as the second primary tumor and the impact of previous extra-pulmonary malignancies. Patients' data were obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The patients were divided into lung surgery and non-surgery groups. Propensity-score matching was used to balance potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to test the overall survival and lung-cancer-specific survival. Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate death risk. In total 3054 lung surgery and 1094 non-surgery patients with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer as the second primary tumor were included. The surgery group showed longer overall survival (68 vs. 22 months) and lung cancer-specific survival (not reached vs. 37 months) than those of non-surgery groups (both P < 0.001). Patients with previous hormone-dependent malignancies had similar survival rates (overall survival: 22 vs. 20 months, P = 0.666; lung cancer-specific survival: 38 vs. 37 months, P = 0.292) as those with non-hormone dependent malignancies in the non-surgery group. Significantly longer overall survival (90 vs. 60 months, P = 0.001) was observed in patients with hormone-dependent malignancies in the surgery group; however, there was no difference in lung cancer-specific survival (P = 0.225). Competing risk analysis showed that for patients undergoing lung surgery, there was higher previous malignancy-induced mortality in patients with non-hormone dependent malignancies than in patients with hormone-dependent malignancies. However, there was no difference in lung cancer-induced mortality between the two groups. Patients who underwent lobectomy showed longer survival than those who underwent pneumonectomy and other resection types (89, 27.5 and 65 months, P < 0.001). In summary, lung surgery is beneficial for patients with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer as the second primary tumor after hormone-dependent malignancy resection.

Injectable thermo-sensitive hydrogel loaded hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles for ROS burst in TME and effective tumor treatment

Introduction: Lung cancer the most prevalent cause of cancer-related deaths, and current therapies lack sufficient specificity and efficacy. This study developed an injectable thermosensitive hydrogel harboring hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles and β-lapachone (Lap) (CLH) for lung tumor treatment. Methods: The hydrogel-encapsulated CLH system can remotely control the release of copper ions (Cu2+) and drugs using photothermal effects for non-invasive controlled-release drug delivery in tumor therapy. The released Cu2+ consumes the overexpressed GSH in TME and the generated Cu+ further exploits the TME characteristics to initiate nanocatalytic reactions for generating highly toxic hydroxyl radicals. In addition, in cancer cells overexpressing Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate): quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), Lap can catalyze the generation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) through futile redox cycles. H2O2 is further converted into highly toxic hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton-like reaction, leading to a burst of reactive oxygen species in TME, which further enhances the therapeutic effect of chemokines. Results: Analysis of the antitumor efficacy in a subcutaneous A549 lung tumor model mice showed a significant delay in tumor growth and no systemic toxicity was detected. Discussion: In conclusion, we have established a CLH nanodrug platform that enables efficient lung tumor therapy through combined photothermal/chemodynamic therapy (CDT) treatment and self-supplying H2O2 to achieve cascade catalysis, leading to explosive amplification of oxidative stress.

Familial risk associated with lung cancer as a second primary malignancy in first-degree relatives

BACKGROUND

Aggregation of lung cancer (LCa) in family members is well-documented. However, little is known on the familial risk of LCa when first-degree relatives (FDRs, parents or siblings) are diagnosed with LCa as a second primary malignancy (LCa-2). We aimed to investigate whether and to what extent a family history of LCa-2 was associated with an increased LCa risk.

METHODS

In this Swedish national cohort we identified 127,865 individuals who had one FDR affected by LCa as a first primary cancer (LCa-1) and 15,490 individuals who had one FDR affected by LCa-2, respectively. We then estimated relative risk (RR) of LCa using those without cancer family history as reference.

RESULTS

The number of LCa-2 has been increasing annually and rather similarly in men and women in the last decade. Familial RR of LCa was 1.96 (95%, 1.85-2.07) for LCa-1 family history and 1.89 for LCa-2 (1.62-2.21). Risk was especially high when FDR was diagnosed with early-onset LCa-2 and when siblings were affected by LCa-2. The RR was 1.53 (1.10-2.12) when LCa-2 in FDR was diagnosed within 26 months after first primary cancer, and it increased to 2.16 (1.62-2.90) when LCa-2 was diagnosed between 74 to 154 months. Higher risk was observed for first primary cancer of the ovary (4.45, 1.85-10.7), nervous system (3.49, 1.45-8.38), upper aerodigestive tract (2.83, 1.78-4.49) and cervix (2.55, 1.41-4.61), and for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (3.13, 1.57-6.27).

CONCLUSIONS

LCa risk is associated with diagnosis of LCa-2 in FDR to a similar degree as LCa-1 in FDRs.

Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are the gold standard for informing treatment decisions. Observational studies are often plagued by selection bias, and expert-selected covariates may insufficiently adjust for confounding. We explore how unstructured clinical text can be used to reduce selection bias and improve medical practice. We develop a framework based on natural language processing to uncover interpretable potential confounders from text. We validate our method by comparing the estimated hazard ratio (HR) with and without the confounders against established RCTs. We apply our method to four cohorts built from localized prostate and lung cancer datasets from the Stanford Cancer Institute and show that our method shifts the HR estimate towards the RCT results. The uncovered terms can also be interpreted by oncologists for clinical insights. We present this proof-of-concept study to enable more credible causal inference using observational data, uncover meaningful insights from clinical text, and inform high-stakes medical decisions.

Secondary primary lung cancer after esophageal cancer: a population-based study of 44,172 patients

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to assess the survival, incidence, and characteristics of secondary primary lung cancer (SPLC) after esophageal cancer (EC-LC).

METHODS

The patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who developed SPLC and patients with first primary lung cancer (LC-1) were retrospectively reviewed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries covering 2000-2016. Overall survival and characteristics were compared between patients with EC-LC and patients with LC-1. The independent relation between a history of EC and death was evaluated by calculating hazard ratios in multivariate Cox regression analysis propensity score-matching analysis, and multiple imputation for cases with missing information.

RESULTS

In comparison with the general population, the patients with EC had a higher risk for developing secondary primary lung cancer (SIR =1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-2.05). A history of EC was found to be an independent risk factor of death for lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC) and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients in localized stage based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, propensity score-matching analysis and multiple imputation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significantly increased risk of secondary primary lung cancer in EC survivors and a history of EC adversely affects overall survival in individuals who subsequently develop localized LUSC and LUAD. Clinicians should moderately strengthen lung tissue protection during the management of EC patients.

Primary lung cancer in women after previous breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the USA. Improved survival has resulted in increasing incidence of second primary malignancies, of which lung cancer is the most common. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for lung-cancer screening do not include previous malignancy as a high-risk feature requiring evaluation. The aim of this study was to compare women undergoing resection for lung cancer with and without a history of breast cancer and to assess whether there were differences in stage at diagnosis, survival and eligibility for lung-cancer screening between the two groups.

METHODS

Women who underwent lung-cancer resection between 2000 and 2017 were identified. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment and outcomes data were compared between patients with a history of breast cancer (BC-Lung) and patients without a history of breast cancer (P-Lung) before lung cancer.

RESULTS

Of 2192 patients included, 331 (15.1 per cent) were in the BC-Lung group. The most common method of lung-cancer diagnosis in the BC-Lung group was breast-cancer surveillance or work-up imaging. Patients in the BC-Lung group had an earlier stage of lung cancer at the time of diagnosis. Five-year overall survival was not statistically significantly different between groups (73.3 per cent for both). Overall, 58.4 per cent of patients (1281 patients) had a history of smoking, and 33.3 per cent (731 patients) met the current criteria for lung-cancer screening.

CONCLUSION

Differences in stage at diagnosis of lung cancer and treatment selection were observed between patients with and without a history of breast cancer. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in genomic or oncogenic pathway alterations between the two groups, which suggests that lung cancer in patients who previously had breast cancer may not be affected at the genomic level by the previous breast cancer. The most important finding of the study was that a high percentage of women with lung cancer, regardless of breast-cancer history, did not meet the current USPSTF criteria for lung-cancer screening.

Epidemiology and clinicopathological features of lung cancer in patients with prior history of breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States, is the most common subsequent primary cancer among breast cancer survivors. In this review, we examine the risk factors that cause subsequent primary lung cancer after breast cancer (referred to herein as BCLC patients) as well as the prognostic factors that may affect survival. Notable clinicopathological features include patient characteristics such as age, smoking history, and the presence of EGFR or BRCA mutations, as well as factors related to the treatment of breast cancer such as radiation, surgery, chemotherapy, stage, anti-estrogen therapy, and ER/PR/HER2 status.

Risk Factors Associated with a Second Primary Lung Cancer in Patients with an Initial Primary Lung Cancer

Targeted surveillance strategies following initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) treatment are currently limited. One hundred twenty patients diagnosed with IPLC who did not develop second primary lung cancer (SPLC) were matched to 121 patients who developed SPLC. Our analysis found IPLC surgical resection increases SPLC emergence risk regardless of procedure type. Increased survival after IPLC resection warrants close SPLC monitoring.

A grafted peptidomimetic for EGFR heterodimerization inhibition: Implications in NSCLC models

Among the lung cancers, approximately 85% are histologically classified as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) are known to play a crucial role in lung cancer. HER2 overexpression is detected by immunohistochemistry in 2.4%-38% of NSCLC samples. EGFRs have been targeted with three generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and drug resistance has become a major issue; HER2 dimerization with EGFR also plays a major role in the development of resistance to TKI therapy. We have designed grafted peptides to bind to the HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) and inhibit protein-protein interactions of EGFR:HER2 and HER2:HER3. A sunflower trypsin inhibitor (SFTI-1) template was used to graft a peptidomimetic compound. Among several grafted peptides, SFTI-G5 exhibited antiproliferative activity in HER2-positive NSCLC cell lines such as Calu-3 cells with an IC50 value of 0.073 μM. SFTI-G5 was shown to bind to ECD of HER2 and inhibit EGFR:HER2 and HER2:HER3 dimerization and inhibit the phosphorylation of HER2 and downstream signaling proteins. As a proof-of-concept, the in vivo activity of SFTI-G5 was evaluated in two NSCLC mouse models. SFTI-G5 was able to inhibit tumor growth in both models. Furthermore, SFTI-G5 was shown to inhibit EGFR dimerization in tissue samples obtained from in vivo models. These grafted peptides can be used as novel dual inhibitors of EGFR dimerization in NSCLC.

Genotype Driven Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Resistance, Pan Inhibitors and Immunotherapy

Eighty-five percent of patients with lung cancer present with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Targeted therapy approaches are promising treatments for lung cancer. However, despite the development of targeted therapies using Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) as well as monoclonal antibodies, the five-year relative survival rate for lung cancer patients is still only 18%, and patients inevitably become resistant to therapy. Mutations in Kirsten Ras Sarcoma viral homolog (KRAS) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the two most common genetic events in lung adenocarcinoma; they account for 25% and 20% of cases, respectively. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase, and ALK rearrangements are responsible for 3-7% of NSCLC, predominantly of the adenocarcinoma subtype, and occur in a mutually exclusive manner with KRAS and EGFR mutations. Among drug-resistant NSCLC patients, nearly half exhibit the T790M mutation in exon 20 of EGFR. This review focuses on some basic aspects of molecules involved in NSCLC, the development of resistance to treatments in NSCLC, and advances in lung cancer therapy in the past ten years. Some recent developments such as PD-1-PD-L1 checkpoint-based immunotherapy for NSCLC are also covered.

Radiation-Related Deregulation of TUBB3 and BRCA1/2 and Risk of Secondary Lung Cancer in Women With Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer survivors are at increased risk of developing unrelated primary cancers, particularly lung cancer. Evidence indicates that sex hormones as well as a deregulation of DNA-repair pathways may contribute to lung cancer onset. We investigated whether the hormone status and expression of markers involved in DNA repair (BRCA1/2, ERCC1, and P53R2), synthesis (TS and RRM1), and cell division (TUBB3) might be linked to lung cancer risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven breast cancer survivors with unrelated lung cancer and 84 control subjects comprising women with breast cancer (42/84) or lung cancer (42/84) were enrolled. Immunohistochemistry on tumor tissue was performed. Geometric mean ratio was used to assess the association of marker levels with patient groups.

RESULTS

Estrogen receptor was expressed in approximately 90% of the breast cancer group but was negative in the majority of the lung cancer group, a result similar to the lung cancer control group. Likewise, ER isoform β was weakly expressed in the lung cancer group. Protein analysis of breast cancer versus control had a significantly lower expression of BRCA1, P53R2, and TUBB3. Likewise, a BRCA1 reduction was observed in the lung cancer group concomitant with a BRCA2 increase. Furthermore, BRCA2 and TUBB3 increased in ipsilateral lung cancer in women who had previously received radiotherapy for breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

The decrease of DNA-repair proteins in breast cancer could make these women more susceptible to therapy-related cancer. The increase of BRCA2 and TUBB3 in lung cancer from patients who previously received radiotherapy for breast cancer might reflect a tissue response to exposure to ionizing radiation.

Lung cancer screening in patients with previous malignancy: Is this cohort at increased risk for malignancy?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of second primary lung cancer (SPLC) and describe the clinical characteristics and radiological findings in individuals with a prior history of cancer presenting to a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening program at a tertiary cancer center.

METHODS

Patients with a previous history of malignancy, a life expectancy ≥ 5 years referred for CT lung cancer screening between May 2, 2011, and November 28, 2018, were included. Demographics regarding risk factors including smoking history and prior history of thoracic radiation were collected. CT scan features assessed nodule size, morphologic features, and number. The Lung-CT Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) scoring system was retrospectively applied to studies performed before October 2014 and prospectively applied to remainder of studies. Data was collected in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant manner.

RESULTS

A total of 543 patients were studied (mean age of 66 years). All had a previous history of cancer, most commonly breast cancer 205 (38%), head and neck cancer 105 (19%), and lung cancer 87 (16%). Of screening CTs performed, 17.5% were positive screening study results as per Lung-RADS scoring system. SPLC was diagnosed in 35 patients (6.4%) with 21 prevalence cancers detected and 14 interval cancers detected in subsequent screening rounds.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of screen-detected SPLC in patients with prior malignancy is higher than reported rates seen in historical prospective screening studies. Our study suggests the need for prospective research to evaluate any mortality benefit that screening may have in this population.

KEY POINTS

• The rate of screen-detected second primary lung cancer in patients with prior malignancy is higher than reported rates seen in historical prospective randomized lung cancer screening studies in a general screened population. • Patients with a prior malignancy undergoing lung cancer screening have higher rates of positive screening studies and higher rates of invasive diagnostic procedures than those reported in a general screening population. • Prospective research is required to evaluate if screening offers a mortality benefit in this population.

Long-term survival among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosed after another malignancy: a SEER population-based study

BACKGROUND

To explore overall survival (OS) and GISTs-specific survival (GSS) among cancer survivors developing a second primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study, where patients with GISTs after another malignancy (AM-GISTs, n = 851) and those with only GISTs (GISTs-1, n = 7660) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (1988-2016). Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The most commonly diagnosed first primary malignancy was prostate cancer (27.7%), followed by breast cancer (16.2%). OS among AM-GISTs was significantly inferior to that of GISTs-1; 10-year OS was 40.3% vs. 50.0%, (p < 0.001). A contrary finding was observed for GSS (10-year GSS 68.9% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.002). In the AM-GISTs group, a total of 338 patients died, of which 26.0% died of their initial cancer and 40.8% died of GISTs. Independent of demographics and clinicopathological characteristics, mortality from GISTs among AM-GISTs patients was decreased compared with their GISTs-1 counterparts (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.84; p < 0.001), whereas OS was inferior among AM-GISTs (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99-1.25; p = 0.085).

CONCLUSIONS

AM-GISTs patients have decreased risk of dying from GISTs compared with GIST-1. Although another malignancy history does not seemingly affect OS for GISTs patients, clinical treatment of such patients should be cautious.

The prognostic significance of the 8th edition AJCC TNM staging system for non-small-cell lung cancer is not applicable to lung cancer as a second primary malignancy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It is unclear whether the prognostic significance of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is applicable to lung cancer as a second primary malignancy (LCSPM). This study used a population-based database to evaluate this relationship.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with second primary lung cancer after a nonpulmonary malignancy were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry from 2004 to 2015. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) and multivariable CIF regression analyses were performed to estimate the difference in disease-specific mortality (DSM) among different TNM stages.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 2687 patients from the SEER database. After CIF analysis, although rates of 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year DSM trended higher with increasing TNM stages, the DSM curves overlapped for many subcategories. In a multivariable regression analysis, hazards ratios (HRs) for subcategories of stage Ι demonstrated no significant difference compared with the reference stage ΙA1 ([ΙA2 HR = 1.120; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.477-2.626]; [ΙA3 HR = 1.762; 95% CI, 0.752-4.126]; [ΙB HR = 2.003; 95% CI, 0.804-4.911]). The following HRs trended higher for increasing TNM stages but with overlapping CIs among adjacent stage groupings.

CONCLUSION

The 8th edition AJCC TNM staging system fails to provide accurate prognostic value for LCSPM.

Mortality of lung cancer as a second primary malignancy: A population-based cohort study

Lung cancer as a second primary malignancy (lung‐2) is increasingly common, but its prognosis is poorly understood. This study aims to examine the overall and cancer‐specific survival of patients diagnosed with lung‐2 compared to lung‐1. Primary lung cancer patients diagnosed from 1988 to 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were included. Lung‐2 was identified in patients with a previous diagnosis of nonlung primary malignancy in SEER. Hazard ratios (HRs) of overall and lung cancer‐specific mortality were estimated among patients with lung‐2 compared to lung‐1, adjusting for age and calendar period at diagnosis, sex, race, socioeconomic status, tumor stage, histology, tumor grade, and treatment. A total of 679 541 and 85 758 patients were identified as lung‐1 and lung‐2, respectively. Compared to lung‐1, patients with lung‐2 were more likely to be diagnosed at localized stage, with smaller primary tumor, and treated with surgery. Lung‐2 patients were at lower risk of lung cancer‐specific mortality in the first 5 years (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.76‐0.78 at <1 year; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.86‐0.89 from 1 to <5 years) but at higher risk thereafter (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.27‐1.37 from 5 to 10 years), independent of tumor characteristics and cancer treatment. Similar pattern was found for overall mortality, although the survival benefit was restricted to the first year after diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with lung‐2 face a favorable lung cancer‐specific survival within the early period after diagnosis. A conservative approach to manage lung‐2 solely based on malignancy history is not supported.

Second Primary Lung Cancer After Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study of 6,269 Women

Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) and lung cancer are the most two common cancers with highest morbidity and mortality for women. With prolonged survival, there comes the possibility that BC patients will develop second primary cancers. We evaluate the characteristics, incidence and survival of second primary non-small cell lung cancer (BC-NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (BC-SCLC) after breast cancer. Patients and methods: Second primary lung cancer risks using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) [95% confidence intervals (95% CIs)] were calculated among breast cancer patients in SEER-18 (2000-2014). Survival outcomes were also analyzed for both BC-NSCLC and BC-SCLC. Results: A total of 6,269 second lung cancer patients after a localized or regional BC were identified. The incidence rate was modestly higher compared to the general population (SIR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00-1.06). For ER-, PR- and HER2- groups, SIRs were 1.26, 1.16, 1.13, respectively (all p < 0.05). Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients have an even higher incidence rate of lung cancer (SIR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.29-1.94). Elevated SIRs were also observed among the following groups: within 1 year after BC diagnosed, a young age at BC diagnosed, black people, poorly or undifferentiated histological grade of breast cancer. Median survival (MST) after localized, regional and distant BC-NSCLC was 68.0, 26.0, and 6.0m. Five-year survival rates for BC-NSCLC were 53.9, 29.8 and 5.7% in each stage, which were significantly higher compared to first primary NSCLC (all p < 0.001). ER-/PR- or TNBC were unfavorable prognostic factors for BC-NSCLC. The survival rates of BC-SCLC were no significant different compared to first primary SCLC. Conclusion: BC patients, especially for TNBC, are at a high risk of developing second primary lung cancers. BC history may be a favorable prognostic factor for NSCLC (but not SCLC) patients. Clinicians should closely follow up BC patients with high-risk factors.

Problems to affect long-term survival for breast cancer patients: An observational study of subsequent lung/bronchus malignancies

The overall survival of breast cancer (BC) patients increased significantly for decades; however, their long-term survival was seriously impaired by subsequent malignancies. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of subsequent lung / bronchus primary malignancies among BC survivors.A total of 535,941 BC female survivors diagnosed were identified by using SEERStat database in 1973 to 2014. Among them, 9398 had subsequent lung/bronchus malignancies. Clinico-pathological risk factors were evaluated for the development of subsequent lung/bronchus cancer. The main measures were the incidence and risk factors of subsequent lung/bronchus primaries. Logistic regression analysis and survival analysis were performed.Overall, among 535,941 BC survivors, 73,394 (13.69%) patients with subsequent primaries were identified from 1973 to 2014. The overall medium second tumor-free time was 72 months. Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive, radiotherapy, and surgery treatment were protective factors against overall subsequent malignancies, whereas HER2/hormone receptor (HR) subtype triple negative, increasing tumor size, low differentiation grade, and high TNM stage were risk factors associated with overall subsequent malignancies. Surgical implantation reconstruction was risk factor for lung/bronchus cancer. Even though BC patients had a favorite 5-year survival, their long-term survival was affected by subsequent malignancies, especially for lung/bronchus cancer with high mortality.Nearly 13% BC survivors suffered from subsequent malignancies. Increased risk was related to HER2/HR triple negative and advanced TNM stages. Radiotherapy and surgery were protective factors. Our findings may inform the subsequent cancer counseling of female BC survivors.

2,3,5,4‑tetrahydroxy diphenylethylene‑2‑O‑glucoside inhibits the adhesion and invasion of A549 human lung cancer cells

Lung cancer is considered to be a serious disease that poses a significant threat to human health. 2,3,5,4‑tetrahydroxy diphenylethylene‑2‑O‑glucoside (THSG) is a bioactive compound derived from Polygonum multiflorum Thunb. That has been demonstrated to possess antioxidative, anti‑inflammatory and antitumor activities. However, little is currently known regarding the potential anticancer effects of this compound in lung cancer. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the effects of THSG on the adhesion and invasion of A549 human lung cancer cells in vitro, and to identify the putative mechanisms involved. Cell Counting kit‑8 assay was performed to determine A549 cell viability following treatment with various doses (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 150 and 200 µM) of THSG for 12, 24 and 48 h. In addition, cell adhesion and invasion were determined following treatment of A549 cells with 0, 10, 25 or 50 µM THSG for 1, 2 or 3 h, respectively. Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis was performed to examine the mRNA expression levels of Snail, E‑cadherin, vimentin, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and MMP9 following THSG treatment for 12 h. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the protein expression levels of Snail, E‑cadherin, vimentin, MMP2 and MMP9 following THSG treatment for 24 h. Treatment with THSG (10, 25 and 50 µM) significantly suppressed the adhesion and invasion of A549 human lung cancer cells in a dose‑dependent manner. In addition, the mRNA and protein expression levels of adhesion and invasion‑associated factors were decreased significantly in A549 cells treated with THSG. In conclusion, THSG effectively suppressed the adhesion and invasion of human lung cancer cells potentially by inhibiting the expression of adhesion and invasion‑related genes.

Subsequent thoracic cancers among patients diagnosed with lung cancer: a SEER database analysis

BACKGROUND

Population-based data on the development of subsequent thoracic cancers following the initial diagnosis of lung cancer are scarce. We evaluated this clinical scenario in lung cancer patients registered within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

The SEER database (1988-2013) was queried using the SEER*Stat program to determine the clinico-pathological features of lung cancer patients who develop subsequent thoracic cancers as well as the characteristics of these subsequent cancers. Associations were ascertained with chi-squared tests and survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated to determine the risk of each type of subsequent cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 223,274 lung cancer patients were identified and included in the current study. In this cohort, 6387 patients developed subsequent thoracic cancers. The following were associated with a higher likelihood of second cancers: female gender, younger age, white race, adenocarcinoma histology, married, lower AJCC stage, earlier year of diagnosis and local treatment with surgery rather than radiotherapy (p < .0001 for all parameters). In the subset of patients with subsequent thoracic cancers, survival was best for patients with second primary breast cancer followed by patients with lung or esophageal cancer (p < .0001). SIR analyses showed an excess risk for the development of esophageal cancer and second primary lung cancer following an initial diagnosis of lung cancer. This risk persists regardless of gender or receipt of radiotherapy (p < .05 for all scenarios).

CONCLUSION

There is an excess risk for the development of esophageal cancer and second primary lung cancer following an initial lung cancer diagnosis. This risk is present irrespective of gender or receipt of radiotherapy.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer as a Second Primary Among Patients With Previous Malignancy: Who Is at Risk?

BACKGROUND

Patients with previous malignancies could be at increased risk of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the extent of the risk is unknown for many cancer types; thus, it is unclear who might benefit from screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data set from 1992 to 2012 was used to identify patients with previous malignancies who received a diagnosis of NSCLC ≥ 6 months after their initial cancer diagnosis. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for NSCLC were calculated as a ratio of the observed to expected cases adjusted by person-years at risk. Cancers with a SIR > 1.0 had a risk of NSCLC greater than expected. The analyses were stratified by sex, radiation therapy use, and histologic type.

RESULTS

Among the cancer survivors, 32,058 developed NSCLC. Smoking-related (lung, head and neck, bladder) and hematologic malignancies, regardless of previous radiation therapy, had the greatest SIR for NSCLC (range, 1.97-4.88). Colorectal and renal cancer survivors also had an increased SIR for NSCLC (1.16 and 1.21, respectively). Women with previous pancreatic cancer treated with radiation, breast cancer with or without radiation therapy, and those with thyroid cancer demonstrated a greater SIR for lung adenocarcinoma. Men with previous irradiated prostate cancer also had an elevated SIR (1.08; 99% confidence interval, 1.01-1.15) for lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with melanoma, prostate or uterine cancer had a lower SIR for NSCLC than expected.

CONCLUSION

Smoking-related malignancies had the greatest risk of NSCLC. Radiation therapy conferred an elevated risk of NSCLC for certain cancers. Melanoma, prostate, and uterine cancer survivors had a low risk of NSCLC. These results could help identify high-risk screening candidates in the growing population of cancer survivors.

Patients with a Previous History of Malignancy Undergoing Lung Cancer Screening: Clinical Characteristics and Radiologic Findings

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and radiologic findings in patients with a previous history of malignancy who underwent computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with a previous history of malignancy and a life expectancy of at least 5 years who were referred for lung cancer screening between May 2, 2011, and September 24, 2014, were included. CT scan features assessed included nodule size, morphologic features, and number. The Lung-CT Reporting and Data System scoring system was retrospectively applied to all studies.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were studied (mean age of 66 years and median smoking history of 50 pack-years). All had a previous history of cancer, most often breast cancer (60 patients [43%]), head or neck cancer (26 patients [19%]), and lung cancer (16 patients [12%]). Of these patients, 42 (30%) had a positive screening study result. Lung cancer was diagnosed in seven patients (5%), and a radiation-induced chest wall sarcoma was diagnosed in one patient (1%); 42 patients (30%) had a positive chest CT scan per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network lung cancer screening nodule follow-up algorithm.

CONCLUSION

The rate of diagnosis of lung cancer in our patient population is higher than in several previously published studies. Smokers with a history of malignancy may be a group at particularly high risk for the development of subsequent lung cancer.

Lung cancer screening: Should we be excluding people with previous malignancy?

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was a large, randomized, controlled study showing a 20% reduction of lung cancer mortality and 7% reduction of all cause mortality using annual low dose computed tomography (LDCT) in a high risk population. NLST excluded people with a previous history of cancer treatment within the past 5 years and all people with a history lung cancer. The aim of this work is to review how lung cancer screening trials addressed the confounding effect of previous malignancy. We also review the subsequent recommendations by the United States Preventative Task Force Services, multiple professional societies and the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services which defer either to NLST criteria or, clinician judgment or refrain from asserting any recommendation on the topic, respectively. Implications of lung cancer screening in the setting of previous malignancies, specifically lung, head and neck, esophageal, gastric, breast, colorectal cancer and lymphoma are also discussed. With lung cancer screening, an antecedent malignancy introduces the possibility of discovering metastasis as well as lung cancer. In some circumstances diagnosis and treatment of oligometastatic disease may confer a survival benefit. The survival benefit of treating either lung cancer or oligometastatic disease as result of lung cancer screening has yet to be determined. Further studies are needed to determine the role of lung cancer screening in the setting of previous malignancy.

Risk of subsequent gastrointestinal cancer among childhood cancer survivors: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at increased risk of developing subsequent malignant neoplasms, including gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. We performed a systematic review to summarize all available literature on the risk of, risk factors for, and outcome after subsequent GI cancer among CCS.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature databases Medline/PubMed (1945-2014) and Embase (1947-2014) was performed to identify studies that consisted of ⩾1000 CCS and assessed incidence of or mortality from subsequent GI cancer as an outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies were included. Studies that reported risk measures for subsequent GI cancer compared to the general population showed a 3.2 to 9.7-fold elevated risk in cohort studies including all childhood cancer types. Abdominal radiotherapy was associated with an increased risk of subsequent GI cancer in all four studies that assessed this risk. Survivors who had received procarbazine and platinum agents were also suggested to be at increased risk.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal radiotherapy is a risk factor for developing a subsequent GI cancer. Few studies examined detailed treatment-related risk factors and most studies had small number of GI cancer cases. Therefore, no conclusions could be drawn on the effect of time since childhood cancer on GI cancer risk and on outcome after a subsequent GI cancer. Additional research is necessary to further explore risk factors for and outcome after a subsequent GI cancer, and to systematically evaluate the harms and benefits of GI screening among high-risk survivors in order to give sound screening recommendations.