A Randomized Phase 3 Trial Comparing Pemetrexed/Carboplatin and Docetaxel/Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment for Advanced, Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Renal dysfunction during osimertinib treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer positive for EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) positive for EGFR activating mutations. Although renal dysfunction associated with osimertinib treatment is reported to be rare, detailed information on this adverse effect is needed because cytotoxic drugs such as pemetrexed are also widely administered for NSCLC but cannot be used in individuals with renal dysfunction.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected clinical data including the serum creatinine concentration and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during osimertinib treatment for 130 NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

Serum creatinine and eGFR worsened gradually during osimertinib treatment, with the median value of creatinine at the point of greatest deterioration differing significantly from that at baseline (0.93 versus 0.72 mg/dL, P < 0.01). Seventy patients (54 %) experienced worsening of the CTCAE grade for creatinine increased, with the frequency of patients with grade 1 or 2 being increased significantly (P < 0.01) at the point of greatest deterioration relative to baseline (grade 1, 46.9 % versus 14.6 %; grade 2, 14.6 % versus 0.8 %, respectively). A higher serum creatinine level at baseline was a significant risk factor for worsening of the CTCAE grade (odds ratio of 1.66, P < 0.001). The median serum creatinine and eGFR at 4 weeks after osimertinib discontinuation had improved to levels similar to those for baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal dysfunction occurred frequently during osimertinib treatment but was ameliorated after drug discontinuation, suggesting that, although renal function should be carefully monitored, its impairment is not likely to affect subsequent chemotherapy in most patients.

TROPION-Lung07: Phase III study of Dato-DXd + pembrolizumab ± platinum-based chemotherapy as 1L therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

For patients with advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations and low (<50%) PD-L1 expression, pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy is a preferred first-line treatment. These patients have comparatively worse outcomes than those with higher PD-L1 expression, underscoring the need for new combination strategies. Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd), a TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity and safety in this patient population. We describe the rationale and design of TROPION-Lung07, a randomized, open-label Phase III study assessing Dato-DXd in combination with pembrolizumab with/without platinum-based chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations and <50% PD-L1 expression. Primary study objectives are progression-free survival and overall survival.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05555732 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Progression-free survival estimation of docetaxel-based second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis from 18 randomized control trials

Background

Lung cancer is the foremost cause of cancer-related death globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85-90% of cases. Targeted therapy is the most essential therapeutic option for NSCLC, other common treatments include radiation therapy, surgery, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy.

Objective

Our study objective was to estimate whether progression-free survival (PFS) is an outcome of NSCLC extracted from 18 randomized control trials (RCTs) with docetaxel as experimental group and antineoplastic agent, kinase inhibitor, and monoclonal antibodies as a control group.

Methods

We selected relevant studies published between 2011 and 2022 using Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library. Advanced NSCLC, chemotherapy, RCT, docetaxel, and second-line treatment were the terms included in the search. A total of 9738 patients were evaluated from the 18 identified studies. We used the meta package of R Studio to perform the meta-analysis. Graphical funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias visually.

Results

Patients who underwent docetaxel-based therapy had a considerably longer PFS than those who got antineoplastic agents, kinase inhibitors, or monoclonal antibodies-based treatment. Patients in the standard treatment arm had a slightly longer PFS than those in the experimental therapy arm in the overall meta-analysis.

Conclusion

Docetaxel outperformed monoclonal antibodies, antineoplastic agents, and kinase inhibitors in the second-line therapy of advanced NSCLC since PFS was extensively utilized.

Bronchial arterial chemoembolization with Drug-Eluting beads plus sequential chemotherapy for the treatment of stage III and IV lung squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of bronchial arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-BACE) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with stage III and IV lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) who are not appropriate candidates for radiochemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we screened all adult patients undergoing either DEB-BACE plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone for stage III or IV LCSS at authors' center from January 2018 to August 2021. Each 21-day chemotherapy cycle consisted of intravenous injection of gemcitabine (1.0 g/m2) on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 (mg/m2) on day 1. The planned cycles were 4. DEB-BACE consisted of microcatheter infusion of CalliSpheres beads carrying cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1.0 g/m2), at 3 weeks prior to chemotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), pulmonary response, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

The final analysis included 95 patients in the chemotherapy group and 41 patients in the combination treatment group. The median OS was 14 months (95 % CI 11.0-17.0) in the chemotherapy group and 19 months (95 % CI 18.0-24.0) in the combination group (P = 0.015). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, DEB-BACE plus chemotherapy was associated with lower risk of death versus chemotherapy only (HR 0.16, 95 % CI 0.05-0.52; log rank test P = 0.003). The median PFS was 6 months (95 % CI 4.0-7.0) in the chemotherapy group and 8 months (95 % CI 6.0-8.0) in the combination group (P = 0.015). The pulmonary objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 48.4 % and 62.1 % in chemotherapy group versus 82.9 % and 90.2 % in combination group (P < 0.001 and = 0.001, respectively). AEs occurred in 133 patients (97.8 %). The rate of bone marrow suppression was 48.4 % (46/95) in the chemotherapy group versus 7.3 % (3/41) in the combination group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy alone, DEB-BACE plus chemotherapy was associated with longer survival outcomes and lower rate of bone marrow suppression.

Gastrodin destabilizes survivin and overcomes pemetrexed resistance

Survivin is a bifunctional protein that plays crucial roles in tumorigenesis. In the present study, we discovered that the natural product gastrodin suppressed the cell viability and colony formation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines A549, HCC827, and H460 in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, gastrodin enhanced the protein levels of cleaved-caspase 3 by activating the endogenous mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Gastrodin inhibits protein kinase B (Akt)/WEE1/cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) signaling to downregulate survivin Thr34 phosphorylation. Survivin Thr34 dephosphorylation caused by gastrodin interfered with the binding of ubiquitin-specific protease 19 (USP19), which eventually destabilized survivin. We revealed that the growth of NSCLC xenograft tumors was markedly suppressed by gastrodin in vivo. Furthermore, gastrodin overcomes pemetrexed resistance in vivo or in vitro. Our results suggest that gastrodin is a potential antitumor agent by reducing survivin in NSCLC.

Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

BACKGROUND

Most people who are newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have advanced disease. For these people, survival is determined by various patient- and tumor-related factors, of which the performance status (PS) is the most important prognostic factor. People with PS 0 or 1 are usually treated with systemic therapies, whereas people with PS 3 or 4 most often receive supportive care. However, treatment for people with PS 2 without a targetable mutation remains unclear. Historically, people with a PS 2 cancer are frequently excluded from (important) clinical trials because of poorer outcomes and increased toxicity. We aim to address this knowledge gap, as this group of people represents a significant proportion (20% to 30%) of the total population with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the best first-line therapy for advanced lung cancer in people with performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 17 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different chemotherapy (with or without angiogenesis inhibitor) or immunotherapy regimens, specifically designed for people with PS 2 only or studies including a subgroup of these people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. overall survival (OS), 2. health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and 3. toxicity/adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 4. tumor response rate, 5. progression-free survival, and 6. survival rates at six and 12 months' treatment. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 22 trials in this review and identified one ongoing trial. Twenty studies compared chemotherapy with different regimens, of which 11 compared non-platinum therapy (monotherapy or doublet) versus platinum doublet. We found no studies comparing best supportive care with chemotherapy and only two abstracts analyzing chemotherapy versus immunotherapy. We found that platinum doublet therapy showed superior OS compared to non-platinum therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.78; 7 trials, 697 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in six-month survival rates (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.41; 6 trials, 632 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), whereas 12-month survival rates were improved for treatment with platinum doublet therapy (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97; 11 trials, 1567 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). PFS and tumor response rate were also better for people treated with platinum doublet therapy, with moderate-certainty evidence (PFS: HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.77; 5 trials, 487 participants; tumor response rate: RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.05; 9 trials, 964 participants). When analyzing toxicity rates, we found that platinum doublet therapy increased grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicities, all with low-certainty evidence (anemia: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.92; neutropenia: RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.82; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.96, 95% CI 1.73 to 9.06; all 8 trials, 935 participants). Only four trials reported HRQoL data; however, the methodology was different per trial and we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. Although evidence is limited, there were no differences in 12-month survival rates or tumor response rates between carboplatin and cisplatin regimens. With an indirect comparison, carboplatin seemed to have better 12-month survival rates than cisplatin compared to non-platinum therapy. The assessment of the efficacy of immunotherapy in people with PS 2 was limited. There might be a place for single-agent immunotherapy, but the data provided by the included studies did not encourage the use of double-agent immunotherapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that as a first-line treatment for people with PS 2 with advanced NSCLC, platinum doublet therapy seems to be preferred over non-platinum therapy, with a higher response rate, PFS, and OS. Although the risk for grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicity is higher, these events are often relatively mild and easy to treat. Since trials using checkpoint inhibitors in people with PS 2 are scarce, we identified an important knowledge gap regarding their role in people with advanced NSCLC and PS 2.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving First-Line Treatment in the United States: An Insurance Claims-Based Descriptive Analysis

BACKGROUND

An estimated 10-15% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases present with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm). While EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) such as osimertinib have become first-line (1L) standard of care for these patients, limited chemotherapy use still occurs in real-world practice. Studies of healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost of care provide a means by which the value of various treatment regimens, healthcare efficiency, and disease burden can be assessed. These studies are important for population health decision makers and health systems that prioritize value-based care to drive population health.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to descriptively assess HRU and costs among patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC initiating 1L therapy in the United States.

METHODS

IBM MarketScan Research Databases (January 1, 2017 to April 30, 2020) were used to identify adult patients with advanced NSCLC, based on a diagnosis for lung cancer (LC) and initiation of 1L therapy or diagnosis of metastases within 30 days of the first LC diagnosis. All patients had ≥ 12 months of continuous insurance eligibility prior to the first LC diagnosis and initiated (in 2018 or after) an EGFR-TKI during any line of therapy to proxy EGFRm status. Per-patient-per-month all-cause HRU and costs were described during 1L for patients initiating 1L osimertinib or chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 213 patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC were identified (mean age at 1L initiation: 60.9 years; 69.0% female). In 1L, 66.2% initiated osimertinib, 21.1% chemotherapy, and 12.7% another regimen. Mean 1L therapy duration was 8.8 months (osimertinib) and 7.6 months (chemotherapy), respectively. Among osimertinib recipients, 28% had an inpatient admission, 40% an emergency room (ER) visit, and 99% an outpatient visit. Among chemotherapy recipients, these proportions were 22%, 31%, and 100%. Mean monthly all-cause healthcare costs among osimertinib and chemotherapy patients were US$27,174 and US$23,343, respectively. Among osimertinib recipients, drug-related costs (including pharmacy and outpatient antineoplastic drug and administration costs) made up 61% (US$16,673) of total costs, inpatient costs 20% (US$5462), and other outpatient costs 16% (US$4432). In chemotherapy recipients, 59% (US$13,883) of total costs were drug-related, 5% (US$1166) were inpatient costs, and 33% (US$7734) other outpatient costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher mean total cost of care was observed among patients receiving 1L TKI (osimertinib) than 1L chemotherapy in EGFRm advanced NSCLC. However, descriptive differences in type of spending and HRU were identified: higher inpatient costs and inpatient days for osimertinib versus higher outpatient costs for chemotherapy. Findings suggest that significant unmet needs may remain for 1L treatment of EGFRm NSCLC, and despite significant advances in targeted care, further individualized therapies are needed to balance benefits, risks, and total cost of care. Furthermore, observed descriptive differences in inpatient admissions may have implications for quality of care and patient quality of life, for which additional research is warranted.

Correlations between objective response rate and survival-based endpoints in first-line advanced non-small cell lung Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The study objective was to estimate the relationship between objective response and survival-based endpoints by drug class, in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of first-line aNSCLC therapies reporting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and/or objective response rate (ORR). Trial-level and arm-level linear regression models were fit, accounting for inclusion of immunotherapy (IO)-based or chemotherapy-only RCT arms. Weighted least squares-based R² were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For the main trial-level analysis of OS vs. ORR, the surrogate threshold effect was estimated. Exploratory analyses involved further stratification by: IO monotherapy vs. chemotherapy, dual-IO therapy vs. chemotherapy, and IO + chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy.

RESULTS

From 17,040 records, 57 RCTs were included. In the main analysis, trial-level associations between OS and ORR were statistically significant in both the IO-based and chemotherapy-only strata, with R² estimates of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.26-0.81) and 0.34 (0.05-0.63), respectively. OS gains associated with a given ORR benefit were statistically significantly larger within IO vs. chemotherapy comparisons compared to chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy comparisons (p < 0.001). Exploratory analysis suggested a trend by IO type: for a given change in ORR, 'pure' IO (IO monotherapy and dual-IO) vs. chemotherapy RCTs tended to have a larger OS benefit than IO + chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy RCTs. For ORR vs. PFS, trial-level correlations were strong in the IO-based vs. chemotherapy (R² = 0.84; 0.72-0.95), and chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy strata (R² = 0.69; 0.49-0.88). For OS vs. PFS, correlations were moderate in both strata (R² = 0.49; 0.20-0.78 and R² = 0.49; 0.23-0.76).

CONCLUSION

The larger OS benefit per unit of ORR benefit in IO-based RCTs compared to chemotherapy-only RCTs provides an important addition to the established knowledge regarding the durability and depth of response in IO-based treatments.

miR-6077 promotes cisplatin/pemetrexed resistance in lung adenocarcinoma via CDKN1A/cell cycle arrest and KEAP1/ferroptosis pathways

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) plus pemetrexed (PEM) remains the predominant therapeutic regimen; however, chemoresistance greatly limits its curative potential. Here, through CRISPR-Cas9 screening, we identified miR-6077 as a key driver of CDDP/PEM resistance in LUAD. Functional experiments verified that ectopic overexpression of miR-6077 desensitized LUAD cells to CDDP/PEM in both cell lines and patient-derived xenograft models. Through RNA sequencing in cells and single-cell sequencing of samples from patients with CDDP/PEM treatments, we observed CDDP/PEM-induced upregulation of CDKN1A and KEAP1, which in turn activated cell-cycle arrest and ferroptosis, respectively, thus leading to cell death. Through miRNA pull-down, we identified and validated that miR-6077 targets CDKN1A and KEAP1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that miR-6077 protects LUAD cells from cell death induced by CDDP/PEM via CDKN1A-CDK1-mediated cell-cycle arrest and KEAP1-NRF2-SLC7A11/NQO1-mediated ferroptosis, thus resulting in chemoresistance in multiple LUAD cells both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, we found that GMDS-AS1 and LINC01128 sensitized LUAD cells to CDDP/PEM by sponging miR-6077. Collectively, these results imply the critical role of miR-6077 in LUAD’s sensitivity to CDDP/PEM, thus providing a novel therapeutic strategy for overcoming chemoresistance in clinical practice.

EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer at Surgical Stages: What Is the Place for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors?

Simple Summary

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor. In lung cancer, they are used to treat advanced EGFR-mutant diseases, and more recently, one has been approved for adjuvant therapy. Even though publications on the topic are numerous, conclusions are difficult to interpret and are sometimes contradictory. We therefore reviewed the literature in order to present an overview of up-to-date data regarding the adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with particular attention given to their benefits, proven or expected, as well as what challenges could be faced when entering them as protocols in standard care.

Abstract

The ADAURA trial has been significant for the perception of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as a tool for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It produced such great insight that the main TKI, Osimertinib, was rapidly integrated into international guidelines for adjuvant use. However, EGFR-mutant NSCLC is a complex entity and has various targeting drugs, and the benefits for patients might not be as clear as they seem. We reviewed trials and meta-analyses considering TKI adjuvant and neoadjuvant use. We also explored the influence of mutation variability and financial evaluations. We found that TKIs often show disease-free survival (DFS) benefits, yet studies have struggled to improve the overall survival (OS); however, the results from the literature might be confusing because of variability in the stages and mutations. The safety profiles and adverse events are acceptable, but costs remain high and accessibility might not be optimal. TKIs are promising drugs that could allow for tailored treatment designs.

The pharmacoeconomic benefits of pemetrexed dose individualization in lung cancer patients

Neutropenia is a dose-related treatment-limiting and costly adverse event of pemetrexed. We postulate that individualized dosing reduces the incidence of neutropenia. The aims of this study were to 1) investigate the costs of pemetrexed-related neutropenia and 2) to determine the pharmacoeconomic benefits of individualized dosing of pemetrexed in terms of budget impact, yearly cost savings and reduction in severe neutropenia. Retrospective data on the treatment of ≥grade 3 neutropenia during pemetrexed-based chemotherapy were collected from three Dutch hospitals to determine the mean health care consumption during a neutropenic episode. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed using a validated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model to predict the neutropenia incidence during four cycles for standard dosing of pemetrexed and individualized dosing. The mean costs per neutropenia and the expected neutropenia incidence were combined to calculate the budget impact and cost savings. We found that the average costs per pemetrexed-associated neutropenic episode to be € 1,490. The neutropenia incidence for the standard and individualized pemetrexed dosing strategies were 12.7 and 9.9%, respectively. This resulted in total expected neutropenia-related costs of approximately € 3.0 million and €2.4 million, respectively. Taking the number of patients eligible for pemetrexed treatment into account, individualized dosing could result in saving €686,000 on a yearly basis in the Netherlands alone. Individualized dosing of pemetrexed can decrease the incidence of neutropenia and thus result in a significant decrease in neutropenia-related costs and decreased risk of hospitalization or even death while maintaining therapeutic exposure.

Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapeutic Molecules as Single and Multiple Agents in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) Patients

Background and Objectives: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world. Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) makes up 85% of all lung cancer cases and the majority of patients are diagnosed when the cancer is advanced. Over the years, many anticancer drugs have been designed and introduced into the market to treat patients with advanced NSCLC. This review aims to discuss the comparative therapeutic benefits of conventional chemotherapeutics and other drugs available for treating advanced NSCLC. Materials and Methods: A literature search for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC was carried out on PubMed and Google Scholar. Objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival were chosen as target endpoints. Results: Monotherapy showed lower treatment endpoints compared to combination therapy. Different combinations of platinum-based doublets demonstrated similar efficacies in treating NSCLC. However, pemetrexed-platinum doublets showed significantly better treatment endpoint in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Most studies showing the best complete response rate (CRR) utilized epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), while most studies producing the best overall survival included programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in their treatment regimens. Conclusions: The findings of this review indicate that targeted therapy using specific inhibitors is now the most promising first-line anticancer treatment available in the market. However, chemotherapy is still effective in treating advanced NSCLC and is viable as a first-line treatment.

A phase I study of binimetinib (MEK 162), a MEK inhibitor, plus carboplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

MEK inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase I study evaluates the MEK inhibitor binimetinib plus carboplatin and pemetrexed in stage IV non-squamous NSCLC patients (NCT02185690).

METHODS

A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. Binimetinib 30 mg BID (dose level 1 [DL1]) or 45 mg BID (dose level 2 [DL2]) was given with standard doses of carboplatin and pemetrexed using an intermittent dosing schedule. The primary outcome was determination of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and safety of binimetinib. Secondary outcomes included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and an exploratory analysis of response based on mutation subtype.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (6 DL1, 7 DL2) were enrolled: 7 KRAS, 5 EGFR, and 1 NRAS mutation. The RP2D was binimetinib 30 mg BID. Eight patients (61.5%) had grade 3/4 adverse events, with dose limiting toxicities in 2 patients at DL2. Twelve patients were evaluated for response, with an investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) of 50% (95% CI 21.1%-78.9%; ORR 33.3% by independent-review, IR), and disease control rate 83.3% (95% CI 51.6%-97.9%). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months (95% CI 2.6 months-NA), with a 6-month and 12-month PFS rate of 38.5% (95% CI 19.3%-76.5%) and 25.6% (95% CI 8.9%-73.6%), respectively. In an exploratory analysis, KRAS/NRAS-mutated patients had an ORR of 62.5% (ORR 37.5% by IR) vs. 25% in KRAS/NRAS wild-type patients. In MAP2K1-mutated patients, the ORR was 42.8%.

CONCLUSION

The addition of binimetinib to carboplatin and pemetrexed appears to have manageable toxicity with evidence of activity in advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

A comparison of the efficacy of antiangiogenic agents combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTION

To explore the effects of combinations of antiangiogenic agents and chemotherapy agents on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and indirectly compare the therapeutic effect of Endostar combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy on NSCLC.

METHODS

We searched 3 electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The ORRs, HRs and 95% confidence intervals of OS and PFS were used to compare the efficacy of Endostar combined with chemotherapy and bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy. We use the Bayesian network meta-analysis method to make indirect comparisons and obtain rank probabilities; in addition, we used single-arm meta-analysis to synthesize the existing data.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were included in the analysis. Among them, we included a total of 14 interventions. A total of 12,862 patients participated in this analysis. The single-arm meta-analysis showed that the pooled ORR and 95% CI were 0.35 (0.31, 0.39), the pooled HR of OS and 95% CI were 0.89 (0.81, 0.98), and the pooled HR of PFS and 95% CI were 0.67 (0.56, 0.81). According to the results of network meta-analysis, there were no significant differences between the 5 kinds of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy regimens and the 4 kinds of Endostar combined with chemotherapy regimens for improving ORR and prolonging OS and PFS. The rank probabilities suggested that in terms of ORR, Pla + Pem + Bev was the first-ranked intervention (0.288). Pla + Pem + Endo was the first-ranked intervention for prolonging OS (0.423) and Pla + Gem + Endo was the first-ranked intervention for prolonging PFS (0.302).

CONCLUSION

Antiangiogenic agents combined with platinum-containing dual drugs can provide benefits to NSCLC patients. In addition, bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy regimens has better theraputic effect on ORR while Endostar combined with chemotherapy may have better effects on OS and PFS for the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients: Data from the Czech TULUNG Registry

BACKGROUND

Data regarding real-life effectiveness of any treatment may improve clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-life effectiveness of tyrosin-kinase inhibitors, bevacizumab and pemetrexed as first-line treatments in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We analyzed data of 2157 patients of the Czech TULUNG Registry of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who received modern-era treatments between 2011 and 2018. Patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, bevacizumab (+ maintenance), pemetrexed (+ maintenance) as first-line therapy were included in the study. A systematic literature search separately identified clinical trials suitable for calculation of comparator pooled OS and PFS for each regimen. For each subgroup, basic characteristics and survival data (Kaplan-Meier estimates) are shown. We propose the "index of real-life effectiveness" (IRE), a ratio of real-life OS/PFS and comparator pooled OS/PFS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified factors were associated with longer OS (ie, IRE>1.1).

RESULTS

Survival analysis showed median OS of 23 months for erlotinib, 29.3 months for afatinib, 19.6 months for gefitinib, 12.2 months for pemetrexed, 17.5 months for pemetrexed maintenance, 15.8 months for bevacizumab and 15.8 months for bevacizumab maintenance. Calculated IREs for OS for the regimens were: erlotinib 1.013, afatinib 1.184, gefitinib 0.736, pemetrexed 1.188, pemetrexed maintenance 1.294, bevacizumab 1.178, and bevacizumab maintenance 1.189. Multivariate regression analysis showed that these factors were associated with longer OS: lower PS for afatinib; lower PS, absence of adverse events and female sex for bevacizumab; and lower PS and female sex for pemetrexed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study clearly demonstrated that real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems, and comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens. Lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival in most regimens.

KEY POINTS

SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: Comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens; for most regimens, lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems.

Pemetrexed-induced Sweet Syndrome: First case report in the medical literature

INTRODUCTION

Sweet Syndrome, also known as acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by the sudden emergence of painful, edematous, and erythematous papules, plaques, or nodules on the skin, which usually fully responsive to systemic corticosteroids. Skin lesions are often accompanied by fever and leukocytosis. Here we present a case of Sweet Syndrome caused by pemetrexed in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

CASE REPORT

A 52-year-old patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma received multiple lines of chemotherapy. The patient presented with extensive skin lesions after performing of pemetrexed chemotherapy. He had a fever and elevations in blood levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), sedimentation, leucocytes, and neutrophils. Neutrophil predominant perivascular and interstitial dermatitis, focal micropustule formation, and severe neutrophilic dermatosis were reported in skin biopsy. Topical steroid and oral antihistamine treatment were started as initial treatment.Discussion and conclusions: Cutaneous side effects related to pemetrexed are often reported as 'skin rash,' which is a non-specific term. Therefore, the diagnosis of Sweet Syndrome must be confirmed by skin biopsy. It is essential to exclude the presence of an infection and medication history. Recovery in drug-induced Sweet Syndrome occurs after the drug that caused it was discontinued. Systemic corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for most cases.

Combination of Bronchial Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy plus Drug-Eluting Embolic Transarterial Chemoembolization for Treatment of Advanced Lung Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis of 23 Patients

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization with the use of drug-eluting embolic (DEE) particles in the treatment of unresectable advanced lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 23 patients with unresectable lung cancer (stage III/IV) who received BAI chemotherapy and DEE chemoembolization. Treatment response was assessed by enhanced CT and evaluated on the basis of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors at 30 d after the last combination treatment. Patients were followed up until death or March 15, 2020, whichever was first. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and factors associated with OS were evaluated by Cox proportional-hazards test.

RESULTS

Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were seen in 2, 16, 5, and 0 patients at 30 d after the last combination treatment, respectively; therefore, the overall response rate was 78.3% and the disease control rate was 100%. Preprocedure symptoms (hemoptysis in 7 patients and dyspnea in 10) resolved in all cases after combination therapy. Nineteen patients died during follow-up, and 4 survived. Median OS was 15.6 mo (95% confidence interval, 10.1-21.1 mo). On univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, tumor/node/metastasis staging was an independent risk factor for prognosis. There were no serious adverse events during the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of BAI chemotherapy plus DEE chemoembolization appears to be a promising method for treatment of advanced lung cancer.

Predictive value of tumor genetic alteration profiling for chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced NSCLC

Previous studies have suggested that a variety of tumor driver genetic alterations affected the treatment efficacy of chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present study aimed to investigate the association between the tumor genetic alteration landscape and the treatment outcome of first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKIs in advanced NSCLC. A total of 94 patients with advanced NSCLC were recruited. All patients received first-line chemotherapy and/or EGFR-TKIs (either first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI, or third-generation EGFR-TKI) alone or sequentially. Prior to chemotherapy and/or EGFR-TKI treatment, plasma, effusion and/or tumor tissues from the included patients were subjected to next-generation sequencing, targeting 59 genes. The results indicated that the positive genetic alteration status prior to first-line chemotherapy was associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) time compared with the negative status [9.1 vs. 4.0 months; hazard ratio (HR)=6.68; 95% CI, 2.25–19.82; P=0.001). Furthermore, patients with EGFR activating mutation harboring concomitant alterations exhibited a shorter PFS (11.1 vs. 7.4 months; HR=2.14; 95% CI, 1.03–4.44; P=0.04) and overall survival (OS) time [not reached (NR) vs. 32.8 months; HR=4.30; 95% CI, 1.41–13.16; P=0.01] than those without concomitant alterations, with first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. Similarly, patients with T79M mutation harboring concomitant alterations exhibited a shorter PFS (15.6 vs. 3.6 months; HR=9.48; 95% CI, 2.29–39.28; P=0.002) and OS time (NR vs. 32.8 months; HR=4.85; 95% CI, 1.16–20.29; P=0.03) with osimertinib treatment. Taken together, the results demonstrated that positive genetic alteration status predicted greater efficacy of first-line chemotherapy, while concomitant genetic alterations were associated with poor treatment outcome for first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI and third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment.

Combination therapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-such as antibodies to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), to its ligand PD-L1, or to cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4)-are an evolving treatment option for several types of cancer, but only a limited number of patients benefit from such therapy. Preclinical studies have suggested that the combination of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors with either cytotoxic chemotherapy or antibodies to CTLA-4 is a promising treatment strategy for advanced cancer. Indeed, combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have been approved and are now used in clinical practice for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer on the basis of positive results of large-scale clinical trials. In addition, the combination of antibodies to CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) and to PD-1 (nivolumab) has been found to confer a survival benefit in patients with melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. Several ongoing clinical trials are also investigating ICI combination therapy in comparison with standard therapy for other tumor types. The identification of patients likely to achieve a sufficient benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy remains a challenge; however, with the establishment of novel complementary biomarkers being needed. Preclinical and clinical investigations of immune-related adverse events of ICI combination therapy are also warranted to establish management strategies. In this review, we summarize the current landscape of combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus either cytotoxic chemotherapy or CTLA-4 inhibitors to clarify the benefits of and outstanding clinical issues related to such treatment.

The Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guideline for non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV

According to rapid development of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the Japan Lung Cancer Society has been updated its own guideline annually since 2010. In this latest version, all of the procedure was carried out in accordance with grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) system. It includes comprehensive literature search, systematic review, and determination of the recommendation by multidisciplinary expert panel which consisted of medical doctors, pharmacists, nurses, statisticians, and patients from patient advocacy group. Recently, we have had various types of chemotherapeutic drugs like kinase inhibitors or immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Thus, the guideline proposes to categorize patients into three entities: (1) driver oncogene-positive, (2) PD-L1 ≥ 50%, and (3) others. Based on this subgroup, 31 clinical questions were described. We believe that this attempt enables clinicians to choose appropriate treatment easier. Here, we report an English version of the Japan Lung Cancer Society Guidelines 2018 for NSCLC, stages IV.

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aim: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum relative to other regimens in metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSq-NSCLC). Patients & methods: Eligible studies evaluated first-line regimens in NSq-NSCLC patients without known targetable mutations. Relative treatment effects were synthesized with random effects proportional hazards Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) for pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum was statistically significant over all platinum-doublet (HR range: 0.42–0.61), platinum-doublet + bevacizumab (HR range: 0.44–0.53) and platinum-doublet + atezolizumab regimens (HR range: 0.56–0.62). Additionally, pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum numerically improved OS over atezolizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab (HR: 0.65; 95% credible interval: 0.43, 1.01). Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum had 95.6% probability of being the best treatment regimen for OS. Conclusion: Pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + platinum is likely the most efficacious first-line regimen for metastatic NSq-NSCLC.

Systematic evaluation of the efficacy-effectiveness gap of systemic treatments in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer

The divergence between clinical trial results and real-world outcomes is largely unknown for many cancer types. The present study aims overall to assess the efficacy-effectiveness gap (difference between outcomes in clinical trials and the real world) in systemic treatment for metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).All patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2008 and 2014 within a network of seven Dutch large teaching hospitals (Santeon) were studied. For every patient, an efficacy-effectiveness (EE) factor was calculated by dividing individual patients' overall survival (OS) by the pooled median OS assessed from clinical trials with the respective treatment.From 2989 diagnosed patients, 1214 (41%) started with first-line treatment. For all studied regimens, real-world OS was shorter than OS reported in clinical trials. Overall, the EE factor was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85; p<0.001). Real-world patients completed their treatment plan less often and proceeded less frequently to further lines of treatment. These parameters together with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status explained 35% of the variation in EE factor.Survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with chemotherapy or targeted therapy in real-world practice is nearly one-quarter shorter than for patients included in trials. Patients' performance status, earlier discontinuation and fewer subsequent lines of treatment partly explained this difference.

A Phase IV Efficacy Study of Formeta Plus Carboplatin as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Squamous, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Iran: An Affordable Price with Clinical Benefit

Background:

This study performed to assess the efficacy and safety of Formeta (generic form of Pemetrexed) plus Carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced stage, non- squamous, non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Iran.

Methods:

This was a post marketing single-arm phase IV efficacy study of Formeta (manufactured by Oncomed., Czech Republic) and Carboplatin in chemo-naive advanced non-squamous NSCLC Iranian patients. Patients received up to six cycles of Formeta (500 mg/m²) combined with Carboplatin (area under the curve: AUC 5) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the progression free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were safety and overall survival (OS).

Results:

Fifty-two patients were enrolled between June 2014 to January 2016, and 44 patients were evaluable for both safety and efficacy. Partial and complete responses were achieved in 19 (36.5 %) and 2 (3.8%) patients, respectively as well as stable disease in 8 patients (15.3 %). Median of PFS and OS were 7.9 ± 1.1 months and 12.43±0.6 months, respectively. Anemia was the most prevalent adverse events of this regimen. Grades 3 or 4 of adverse events were not observed in any patients. Non-hematologic and other grades of hematologic toxicities were generally mild, and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion:

The combination of Formeta and Carboplatin was effective in advanced non-squamous NSCLC and can be a suitable candidate as first-line treatment in these patient’s population.

Docetaxel increases the risk of severe infections in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to determine whether docetaxel increases the risk of severe infections in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. A thorough literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed (up to February 28, 2017) without any language restrictions. In addition, we searched the www.clinicaltrials.gov website and checked each reference listed in the included studies, relevant reviews and guidelines. We also included randomized controlled trials that reported severe infections in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were administered docetaxel. A meta- analysis was conducted using relative risk and random effects models in Stata 14.0 software. Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were performed using Stata 14.0 software. We identified 354 records from the initial search, and this systematic review ultimately included 43 trials with 12,447 participants. The results of our meta- analysis showed that docetaxel increased the risk of severe infections [relative risk: 2.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-2.93, I² = 69.6%, P = 0.000]. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the type of intervention was a major source of heterogeneity. Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that docetaxel is associated with the risk of severe infections.

Bevacizumab in combination with different platinum-based doublets in the first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis

Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab is the standard treatment for untreated advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). However, adding bevacizumab to chemotherapies other than paclitaxel-carboplatin is, though widely applied clinically, largely unjustified due to the lack of head-to-head data. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to address this important issue. Data of 8,548 patients from 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) receiving six treatments, including taxane-platinum (Taxane-Pt), gemcitabine-platinum (Gem-Pt), pemetrexed-platinum (Pem-Pt), taxane-platinum + bevacizumab (Taxane-Pt + B), gemcitabine-platinum + bevacizumab (Gem-Pt + B) and pemetrexed-platinum + bevacizumab (Pem-Pt + B), were incorporated into the analyses. Direct and indirect evidence of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were synthesized at the hazard ratio (HR) scale and evidence of objective response rate (ORR) and serious adverse events (SAE) were synthesized at the odds ratio (OR) scale. Taxane-Pt + B showed significant advantages in OS (HR = 0.79, p < 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.54, p < 0.001) and ORR (OR = 2.7, p < 0.001) over Taxane-Pt with comparable tolerability (OR = 3.1, p = 0.08). Gem-Pt + B showed no OS benefit compared to any other treatment. No significant differences were detected between Pem-Pt + B and Pem-Pt in four outcomes. In terms of the benefit-risk ratio, Pem-Pt and Taxane-Pt + B were ranked the first and second, respectively. In conclusion, in the first-line treatment for advanced NS-NSCLC, Taxane-Pt and Gem-Pt are the most and least preferable regimens to be used with bevacizumab, respectively. Adding bevacizumab to Pem-Pt remains unjustified because it fails to improve efficacy or tolerability. In terms of the benefit-risk ratio, Pem-Pt and Taxane-Pt + B are the best and second-best treatment for this population.

Evaluation of calculating carboplatin dosage in carboplatin-pemetrexed therapy as the first-line therapy for Chinese patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the application of actual carboplatin in carboplatin plus pemetrexed regimen as first-line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, and to determine the recommended dose of carboplatin for Chinese populations.

METHODS

From January 2014 to April 2016, 151 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received carboplatin and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 ) were included. The area under the curve (AUC) of carboplatin was back-calculated from actual dosages using the Calvert formula. According to the median of calculated AUC, patients were divided into AUC ≥4 and <4 groups.

RESULTS

The median of AUC was 4 (1.8-5.5). A total of 79 patients had an AUC ≥4 and 72 patients had an AUC <4. The mean relative dose intensities of pemetrexed were 100.4% for the AUC ≥4 group, and 101.4% for <4 group. Baseline characteristic variables were balanced between the two groups, except for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance score (P = 0.044). The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 33.8% and 90.1%, respectively, 35.4% and 86.1% for the AUC ≥4 group, and 31.9% and 94.4% for the AUC <4 group. No significant difference was observed in ORR (P = 0.650) and DCR (P = 0.086) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with an AUC of 5 or 6, the actual clinical application of AUC was generally insufficient for Chinese populations; fortunately, therapeutic efficacy remained equal. We found that AUC <4 was as adequate as AUC ≥4 in pemetrexed plus carboplatin regimen as first-line treatment for them.

Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Circulating Tumor Cells as Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Chemotherapy

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are promising prognostic and predictive biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we examined the prognostic role of cfDNA and CTCs, in separate and joint analyses, in NSCLC patients receiving first line chemotherapy. Seventy-three patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in this study. CfDNA and CTC were analyzed at baseline and after two cycles of chemotherapy. Plasma cfDNA quantification was performed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) whereas CTCs were isolated by the ScreenCell Cyto (ScreenCell, Paris, France) device and enumerated according to malignant features. Patients with baseline cfDNA higher than the median value (96.3 hTERT copy number) had a significantly worse overall survival (OS) and double the risk of death (hazard ratio (HR): 2.14; 95% confidence limits (CL) = 1.24–3.68; p-value = 0.006). Conversely, an inverse relationship between CTC median baseline number (6 CTC/3 mL of blood) and OS was observed. In addition, we found that in patients reporting stable disease (SD), the baseline cfDNA and CTCs were able to discriminate patients at high risk of poor survival. cfDNA demonstrated a more reliable biomarker than CTCs in the overall population. In the subgroup of SD patients, both biomarkers identified patients at high risk of poor prognosis who might deserve additional/alternative therapeutic interventions.

Safety profiles of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with pemetrexed plus carboplatin: a real-world retrospective, observational, cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Pemetrexed plus carboplatin (PCb) is a frequently used first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examined the characteristics and safety profile of a NSCLC population treated with PCb area under the concentration-time curve 5 (PCb5) or 6 mg/mL•min (PCb6) under real-world conditions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective, observational, cohort study was conducted, utilizing data from the IMS Oncology US clinic-based, longitudinal, patient-level electronic medical records (EMR), including patients with NSCLC on PCb5 or PCb6 regimens initiated concomitantly on or after the diagnosis of lung cancer during 2004-2014. Patient characteristics and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were described for each cohort. Propensity scores were calculated based on baseline demographic and clinical factors. Propensity score stratification was used to further adjust for cohort differences.

RESULTS

In total, 636 NSCLC patients receiving PCb5 (37% aged ≥70 years) and 184 patients receiving PCb6 (34% aged ≥70 years) who met the inclusion criteria were identified in the EMR. Patients with more comorbidities were more likely to have received PCb5. Overall incidence rates (IRs) per 100 person-years were similar for neutropenia in both cohorts, were numerically higher for anemia (IR = 43.6 vs 101.0) and thrombocytopenia (IR = 1.5 vs 17.9), and were numerically lower for nausea (IR = 14.4 vs 9.9) in the PCb6 vs PCb5 cohort. Within the PCb6 cohort, the IR per 100 person-years was higher for neutropenia for ≥70 year-old patients (IR = 41.1) compared to <70 year-old patients (IR = 14.5). After propensity score stratification, adjusted IRs showed similar patterns.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations included lack of power for AEs other than anemia, given the nature of EMR.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this real-world analysis add to existing evidence from randomized clinical trials about PCb safety profiles in the overall NSCLC population and in elderly patients. These results may guide physicians when making treatment decisions.

Meta-analysis of pemetrexed plus carboplatin doublet safety profile in first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer studies

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis compared safety profiles (selected drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) of first-line pemetrexed plus carboplatin (PCb) area under the concentration-time curve 5 mg/min•mL (PCb5) or 6 mg/min•mL (PCb6), two widely used regimens in clinical practice for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 21 days with either of two carboplatin doses for up to 4-6 cycles. Safety profiles of PCb doses were compared using three statistical analysis methods: frequency table analysis (FTA), generalized linear mixed effect model (GLMM), and the propensity score method. Efficacy outcomes of PCb5 and PCb6 regimens were summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 486 patients mainly from the US, Europe, and East Asia were included in the analysis; 22% (n = 105) received PCb5 in one trial and 78% (n = 381) received PCb6 in four trials. The FTA comparison demonstrated that PCb5 vs PCb6 was associated with a statistically significantly lower incidence of TEAEs, including all-grade thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, and vomiting, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. In the GLMM analysis, PCb5 patients were numerically less likely to experience all-grade and grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The propensity score regression analysis showed PCb5 group patients were significantly less likely than PCb6 group patients to experience all-grade hematologic TEAEs and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and anemia. After applying propensity score 1:1 matching, FTA analysis showed that the PCb5 group had significantly less all-grade and grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities. Overall efficacy outcomes, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate, were similar between the two carboplatin doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledging the limitations of this meta-analysis of five trials, heterogeneous in patient's characteristics and trial designs, the results show that the PCb5 regimen was generally associated with a better safety profile than PCb6 across three statistical approaches, with no apparent impact on survival outcomes.

Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression is associated with outcome of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy

Pemetrexed is an antifolate cytostatic agent targeting several folate-dependent enzymatic pathways, widely used in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic stage non-small cell lung cancer. Aside from the non-squamous histology, there is still no available molecular biomarker predicting treatment efficacy of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the association of thyroid transcription factor 1 expression with outcome of a large cohort of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed. We retrospectively analysed clinical data of 463 patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (IIIB or IV) treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was assessed using indirect immunohistochemical detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue at the time of diagnosis. Thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was detected in the tumour tissue from 76.0% of patients, and tumours from 24.0% of patients were thyroid transcription factor 1 negative. The median progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with thyroid transcription factor 1 positive tumours were 4.8 and 11.8 months compared to 2.8 and 8.3 months for those with thyroid transcription factor 1 negative tumours (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model revealed that thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was significantly associated with progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.57, p < 0.001) and also with overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.73, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the results of the conducted retrospective study suggest that the thyroid transcription factor 1 expression was independently associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced-stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy.

Association of Graded Folic Acid Supplementation and Total Plasma Homocysteine Levels With Hematological Toxicity During First-line Treatment of Nonsquamous NSCLC Patients With Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed is the preferred treatment of nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (ns-NSCLC). Folic acid supplementation (FAS) (350 to 1000 μg daily PO) is recommended to minimize hematological toxicity (HTox). Elevated total plasma homocysteine (tpHcy) predicts increased risk of HTox with pemetrexed in absence of FAS. The current study aimed to assess prevalence of elevated tpHcy levels at baseline and after pemetrexed treatment. Association of graded tpHcy levels/FAS with toxicity was also assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all ns-NSCLC patients undergoing first-line treatment with pemetrexed-containing platinum doublet over 3½ years was carried out. All eligible patients received pemetrexed (500 mg/m) and cisplatin (65 mg/m) each on D1 of a 3-week cycle. FAS was 400 μg for tpHcy< upper limit of normal (ULN), 700 μg for tpHcy 1 to 2 ULN, and 1000 μg for tpHcy>2 ULN. All patients also received oral ferrous sulphate and injectable vitamin B12. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for comparison with previously published studies.

RESULTS

75.7% of 111 patients had stage IV disease. Prevalence of tpHcy levels 2 ULN were 47.8%, 41.4%, and 10.8% pretreatment and 78.9%, 21.1%, and 0% posttreatment, respectively (P<0.0001). Incidence of any grade and grade 3/4 HTox was 87.4% and 17.1% (anemia), 53.2% and 7.2% (leukopenia), 36.9% and 10.8% (neutropenia), and 39.6% and 7.2% (thrombocytopenia), respectively. HTox, non-HTox, and radiologic responses did not differ among patient groups based upon baseline tpHcy levels or upon graded baseline FAS. Incidence of grade 3/4 anemia was higher in current (17.1%; 95% CI, 11.3%-25.2%) as compared with previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of elevated tpHcy levels posttreatment as compared with baseline was reduced significantly with FAS. Among ns-NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed and with FAS of 400 to 1000 μg daily, HTox was not associated with either baseline tpHcy levels or with graded baseline FAS.

Randomized Phase III Study of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin Versus Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin as First-line Treatment of Nonsquamous Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A TRAIL Trial

INTRODUCTION

To date, no prospective phase III trials have directly compared the efficacy of pemetrexed plus cisplatin (Pem-Cis) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (Doc-Cis) in patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 148 chemotherapy-naive patients lacking driver mutations were randomized into 21-day regimens of cisplatin 70 mg/m² with either docetaxel 60 mg/m² (n = 71) or pemetrexed 500 mg/m² (n = 77) for ≤ 4 cycles. The primary objective was to assess the noninferiority of progression-free survival (PFS) for patients receiving the Doc-Cis regimen. The secondary endpoints were the response rates, overall survival, and toxicity profiles.

RESULTS

Partial remission was observed in 24 (31.2%) and 24 (33.8%) patients in the Pem-Cis and Doc-Cis groups, respectively. The median PFS was 4.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-5.0) in the Pem-Cis arm and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.1) in the Doc-Cis arm (P > .05). The median overall survival was longer in the Doc-Cis arm (13.3 months; 95% CI, 8.1-18.5) than in the Pem-Cis arm (11.7 months; 95% CI, 8.6-14.8; P > .05). Between the 2 arms, no significant difference was found in the subsequent treatments after failure of first-line treatment. The rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia was greater in the Doc-Cis arm than in the Pem-Cis arm.

CONCLUSION

In nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients lacking driver mutations, the PFS and response rates were similar between the 2 arms, and toxicity was tolerable, although adverse events and more severe toxicities were observed more frequently in the Doc-Cis arm.

Serum proteomic test in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated in first line with standard chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

VeriStrat is a blood-based proteomic test with predictive and prognostic significance in second-line treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This trial was designed to investigate the role of VeriStrat in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with standard chemotherapy. Here we present the results for 76 non-squamous patients treated with a combination of carboplatin or cisplatin with pemetrexed.

METHODS

The test-assigned classifications of VeriStrat Good or VeriStrat Poor to samples collected at baseline. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and objective response. Exploratory analyses of end points separately in carboplatin/pemetrexed and cisplatin/pemetrexed subgroups were also conducted.

RESULTS

Patients classified as VeriStrat Good had longer PFS and OS than VeriStrat Poor: 6.5 vs 1.6 months and 10.8 vs 3.4 months, respectively; the corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.36 (P<0.0001) and 0.26 (P<0.0001); they were also more likely to achieve objective response. Prognostic significance of VeriStrat was confirmed in multivariate analysis. Significant differences in OS and PFS between Veristrat classifications were also found when treatment subgroups were analysed separately.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial demonstrated clinical utility of VeriStrat as a prognostic test for standard first-line chemotherapy of non-squamous advanced NSCLC.

The role of docetaxel in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer lung cancer: an update

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer lung cancer (NSCLC) is a devastating disease, with poor prognosis for patients with metastatic disease. The management of these patients has evolved during the past decade, challenging the role of cytotoxic chemotherapy as the only available treatment option. Nevertheless, chemotherapy still retains a dominant position for the majority of both treatment naïve and pretreated patients. Among the chemotherapeutic agents, docetaxel is one of the most commonly used in 1st and subsequent treatment lines, even in the current era of precision medicine. Areas covered: We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library for randomized phase III trials that evaluated docetaxel in various clinical settings of NSCLC and for meta-analyses of such trials and we present all relevant data regarding the pharmacology and clinical use of docetaxel in NSCLC. Expert commentary: Despite its diminishing role, docetaxel in combination with novel targeted agents remains an important option of the therapeutic armamentarium in advanced NSCLC.

Weight gain as a surrogate marker of longer survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Weight loss (WL), as a key step of the irreversible and fatal cancer-related anorexia cachexia syndrome is present to some degree in 80% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients upon diagnosis which has been clearly proved to negatively alter patients' performance status, quality of life (QOL), response to treatment, and prognosis. However, WL is not a problem encountered only upon diagnosis but is also commonly reported during the course of aggressive chemotherapy, radiotherapy (RT) and particularly the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT) which may further diminish QOL measures and clinical outcomes. In general, the NSCLC literature has concentrated on WL during the treatment course, but recent studies have demonstrated that it is possible to preserve or even experience weight gain (WG) during or just short after the discontinuation of various cancer treatments in approximately 40% to 45% NSCLC patients. Considering the fact that recent evidence suggest a prognostic and predictive role for WG in anticipation of longer survival times and better response rates in weight gainers, this current manuscript will specifically aim to realize the actual value of WG in locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC patients which may potentially be added to the conventional prognostic and predictive factors as a novel surrogate marker of outcomes in such patients.

The Influence of the Evolution of First-Line Chemotherapy on Steadily Improving Survival in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Clinical Trials

Over the past three decades, survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) clinical trials has doubled with an increase in 1-year survival from 25% to 50 to 55%. This has been mainly attributed to improvements in systemic therapy. Although modern first-line chemotherapy regimens have more favorable toxicity profiles, a statistically significant improvement in overall survival has not been demonstrated in existing meta-analyses of second-generation versus third-generation combinations. Moreover, pivotal trials demonstrating statistically significant survival superiority of third-generation regimens are consistently not reproducible even for nonsquamous populations using pemetrexed-platinum combinations. As enhancement in the efficacy of first-line systemic therapy in patients without identifiable driver mutations is questionable, other factors are discussed that explain the doubling of 1-year survival reported in clinical trials. These factors include second-line or third-line therapy, maintenance chemotherapy, performance status selection, stage migration, sex migration, improved treatment of brain metastases, and better palliative care.

Efficacy of pemetrexed plus platinum doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell-lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of pemetrexed plus platinum doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a trial-level meta-analysis.

Methods

Trials published between 1990 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library). All clinical studies were independently identified by two authors. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted and analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software (version 2.0).

Results

A total of 2,551 patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC from ten trials were included for analysis: 1,565 patients were treated with pemetrexed plus platinum doublet chemotherapy and 986 with platinum plus other first-line chemotherapy. Pooled ORR for pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy was 37.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.7%–44.3%), with median PFS and OS of 5.7 and 16.05 months, respectively. When compared to other platinum-based doublet chemotherapies, the use of pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy significantly improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] =0.86, 95% CI: 0.77–0.97, P=0.01) but not PFS (HR =0.90, 95% CI: 0.80–1.01, P=0.084) in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients.

Conclusion

Pemetrexed plus platinum doublet regimen is an efficacious treatment for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients. Our findings support the use of pemetrexed plus platinum doublet regimen as first-line treatment in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients because of its potential survival benefits.

PRONOUNCE: randomized, open-label, phase III study of first-line pemetrexed + carboplatin followed by maintenance pemetrexed versus paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab in patients ith advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

PRONOUNCE compared the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed+carboplatin followed by pemetrexed (Pem+Cb) with paclitaxel+carboplatin+bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab (Pac+Cb+Bev) in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years of age with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC (American Joint Committee on Cancer v7.0), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 were randomized (1:1) to four cycles of induction Pem+Cb (pemetrexed, 500 mg/m, carboplatin, area under the curve = 6) followed by Pem maintenance or Pac+Cb+Bev (paclitaxel, 200 mg/m, carboplatin, area under the curve = 6, and bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg) followed by Bev maintenance in the absence of progressive disease or discontinuation. The primary objective was progression-free survival (PFS) without grade 4 toxicity (G4PFS). Secondary end points were PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Resource utilization was also assessed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the patients randomized to Pem+Cb (N = 182) and Pac+Cb+Bev (N = 179) were well balanced between the arms. Median (months) G4PFS was 3.91 for Pem+Cb and 2.86 for Pac+Cb+Bev (hazard ratio = 0.85, 90% confidence interval, 0.7-1.04; p = 0.176); PFS, OS, ORR, or DCR did not differ significantly between the arms. Significantly more drug-related grade 3/4 anemia (18.7% versus 5.4%) and thrombocytopenia (24.0% versus 9.6%) were reported for Pem+Cb. Significantly more grade 3/4 neutropenia (48.8% versus 24.6%), grade 1/2 alopecia (28.3% versus 8.2%), and grade 1/2 sensory neuropathy were reported for Pac+Cb+Bev. Number of hospitalizations and overall length of stay did not differ significantly between the arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Pem+Cb did not produce significantly better G4PFS compared with Pac+Cb+Bev. Pem+Cb was not superior in PFS, OS, ORR, or DCR compared with Pac+Cb+Bev. Both regimens were well tolerated, although, toxicity profiles differed.

Systemic Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations to update the American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on systemic therapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

An Update Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology NSCLC Expert Panel based recommendations on a systematic review of randomized controlled trials from January 2007 to February 2014.

RESULTS

This guideline update reflects changes in evidence since the previous guideline.

RECOMMENDATIONS

There is no cure for patients with stage IV NSCLC. For patients with performance status (PS) 0 to 1 (and appropriate patient cases with PS 2) and without an EGFR-sensitizing mutation or ALK gene rearrangement, combination cytotoxic chemotherapy is recommended, guided by histology, with early concurrent palliative care. Recommendations for patients in the first-line setting include platinum-doublet therapy for those with PS 0 to 1 (bevacizumab may be added to carboplatin plus paclitaxel if no contraindications); combination or single-agent chemotherapy or palliative care alone for those with PS 2; afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib for those with sensitizing EGFR mutations; crizotinib for those with ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangement; and following first-line recommendations or using platinum plus etoposide for those with large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Maintenance therapy includes pemetrexed continuation for patients with stable disease or response to first-line pemetrexed-containing regimens, alternative chemotherapy, or a chemotherapy break. In the second-line setting, recommendations include docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed for patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma; docetaxel, erlotinib, or gefitinib for those with squamous cell carcinoma; and chemotherapy or ceritinib for those with ALK rearrangement who experience progression after crizotinib. In the third-line setting, for patients who have not received erlotinib or gefitinib, treatment with erlotinib is recommended. There are insufficient data to recommend routine third-line cytotoxic therapy. Decisions regarding systemic therapy should not be made based on age alone. Additional information can be found at http://www.asco.org/guidelines/nsclc and http://www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.

Efficacy and safety of docetaxel for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials

Background

Several clinical trials have performed risk–benefit analyses comparing docetaxel and pemetrexed or docetaxel and vinca alkaloid, but the efficacy and safety remain uncertain. The aim was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel and pemetrexed or docetaxel and vinca alkaloid for non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

This meta-analysis of Phase III randomized controlled trials was performed after searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the ISI Web of Knowledge for randomized controlled trials. Outcome analyses were overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate with 95% confidence intervals and major grade 3/4 toxicity.

Results

Seven eligible trials involving 2,080 patients were retrieved for analysis. Docetaxel enhanced progression-free survival and overall response rate compared with vinca alkaloid as first-line treatment (P<0.05). However, there was no difference between docetaxel and pemetrexed as both first-line and second-line treatment (P>0.05). With regard to the grade 3/4 toxicity, compared with pemetrexed, docetaxel led to higher neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (P<0.05), but there was no difference in non-hematological toxicity (P>0.05). Docetaxel led to a lower rate of anemia as first-line treatment (P<0.05). Moreover, docetaxel caused less grade 3/4 hematological and non-hematological toxicity compared with vinca alkaloid.

Conclusion

Docetaxel leads to a better result than vinca alkaloid in effectiveness and safety on patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer as first-line therapy. Docetaxel also causes lower toxicity as second-line therapy compared with vinca alkaloid. However, the differences in efficacy and safety between docetaxel and pemetrexed are not obvious. Further clinical study with more details, such as sex, age, histology, and so on, should be considered for illustrating the differences between these two drugs.

NCCTG N0821 (Alliance): a phase II first-line study of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in elderly patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer with good performance status

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the combination of bevacizumab, carboplatin, and pemetrexed will be an effective first-line regimen in fit, elderly patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve, stage IIIB/IV nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients more than 70 years old with good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1) and adequate organ function were eligible. Carboplatin area under the curve 6, pemetrexed 500 mg/m, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle (up to six cycles) followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab. The primary end point of 6-month progression-free survival rate of at least 70% was assessed using a one-stage binomial design. Quality of life (QOL) questionnaires were administered. Polymorphisms in genes encoding relevant proteins (drug targets, transport, and metabolism proteins) were correlated with treatment outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven eligible patients were enrolled. Median age was 74.5 years. Median treatment cycles received was 6. The most common grade 3 or higher non-hematologic adverse events were fatigue (26%) and hypertension (11%); 16% had grade 4 neutropenia and 6.5% had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Three patients experienced grade 3/4 hemorrhagic events (one pulmonary, two gastrointestinal). Primary end point of PFS6 was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.9-73%). Median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.9-10.1), median overall survival was 13.7 months (95% CI: 9.4-16.8). Polymorphic KDR and VEGFA variants correlated with survival and toxicity, respectively. There was no significant change in overall QOL scores over time.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is feasible and did not decrease the QOL in this study population. However, it did not meet the primary efficacy end point.

Percentage Change in Plasma Cytokeratin 18 Is Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Pemetrexed and Carboplatin for the Adenocarcinoma Subtype of NSCLC

BACKGROUND

The adenocarcinoma subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (adeno-NSCLC) is routinely treated with chemotherapy if patients do not have molecular aberrations such as epidermal growth factor receptor mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements. There are currently no validated biomarkers that can predict if patients will gain clinical benefit from chemotherapy, leading to a majority of patients receiving many cycles of unnecessary chemotherapy. We hypothesized that the percentage rise in plasma caspase-cleaved cytokeratin 18 (cCK18) and total cytokeratin 18 (tCK18) assessed before and after chemotherapy correlates with the radiological response to chemotherapy.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 40 patients with stage IV adeno-NSCLC, treated with first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin (AUC5) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2)), were collected prior to chemotherapy and 48 h after treatment. ELISA was used to quantify cCK18 and tCK18.

RESULTS

The male-to-female ratio was 3:1, and the median age of patients was 63 years. Patients who had a clinical benefit (complete response, partial response or stable disease) at the first radiological assessment following chemotherapy had a significantly higher percentage change in plasma tCK18 levels compared to those who had no clinical benefit, i.e. progressive disease (69.5 ± 75.1 vs. 25.3 ± 30.9%, respectively; p = 0.042). The receiver operating characteristic area was 0.712 (p = 0.039). There was an increase in the percentage change in cCK18 in patients with clinical benefit compared to those without clinical benefit but this was not statistically significant (57.6 ± 112.8 vs. 24.38 ± 45.1%, respectively; p = 0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage change in plasma tCK18 levels before and after the first cycle of pemetrexed and carboplatin chemotherapy is associated with clinical benefit. If validated in larger cohorts, this test can be used to identify patients unlikely to respond to treatment who can thus be offered alternative treatments or entry into clinical trials.

Defining the issues in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

SUMMARY 

Elderly patients constitute a substantial proportion of patients with advanced NSCLC. Several unresolved issues surround the treatment of elderly patients with NSCLC, including under-representation in clinical trials, the definitions of fit and unfit patients and the appropriate age cut-off for this population. Taken together, these factors have a large impact on the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. An urgent need exists to develop new strategies for clinical trial design that may lead to improved outcomes in these patients. This review will address the existing barriers and controversies in the management of advanced NSCLC in the elderly, focusing on cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Results of clinical trials conducted in the elderly and those from planned subset analyses for age-unspecified trials will be provided, with a focus on recently reported studies. Outcomes from population databases reporting on this population in a nonclinical trial setting will be reviewed.

Pemetrexed in maintenance treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed, a multitargeting antifolate cytotoxic drug, plays a leading role in front-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Following its approval as second-line monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC, pemetrexed has established itself as the first-line regimen in combination with cisplatin, and its powerful antitumor effects and less cumulative toxicities were then taken advantage of in the JMEN and PARAMOUNT trials, respectively, to pioneer a new treatment strategy of switch and continuation maintenance monotherapy. These developments have brought about a marked paradigm shift, and made pemetrexed indispensable in the treatment for non-squamous NSCLC. So far, only three drugs have been approved for maintenance therapy; pemetrexed both by switch and continuation maintenance, erlotinib by switch maintenance, and bevacizumab by continuation maintenance. Compared with observation alone after defined cycles of the first-line chemotherapy, subsequent pemetrexed maintenance therapy has provided significantly longer survival and infrequent severe adverse events. The cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed maintenance therapy is controversial, as well as the other two maintenance drugs, bevacizumab and erlotinib. The latest attractive attention is a combination maintenance therapy. We may have to consider epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status for selection of a combination pattern. A combination maintenance therapy of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab is potential for patients with wild-type EGFR status, while a EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-containing combination is promising for patients with active EGFR mutation status. Pemetrexed will be a pivotal drug when a combination maintenance therapy is used in practice. For future maintenance therapy, we need to explore reliable predictive selection or exclusion markers that can predict who will really benefit from maintenance therapy.