1
|
Wang J, Zheng M, Yang Y, Zhang L, Wulasihan M. Investigating the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for cardiovascular outcomes in different diseases. ESC Heart Fail 2025. [PMID: 40368329 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.15329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2025] [Accepted: 05/05/2025] [Indexed: 05/16/2025] Open
Abstract
AIMS Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are crucial in managing cardiovascular diseases, with different MRAs demonstrating varying efficacy across diverse disease contexts. This research aims to compare the cardiovascular protective effects of different MRAs across various disease conditions. METHODS Evidence from eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, or real-world registry studies that investigated hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) following MRA treatment were searched in four literature databases. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve values were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. RESULTS Data from a total of 21 investigations involving 61 076 participants were included. The control groups comprised placebo arms in RCTs and non-MRA users in observational studies. In heart failure (HF) patients, finerenone showed highest efficacy with HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.95) versus control, followed by spironolactone (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) and eplerenone (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64-1.10). For non-HF populations, spironolactone showed the most protective effect (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.15-1.10), followed by eplerenone (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.25-1.30) and finerenone (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.50-1.60). In diabetes mellitus population, spironolactone maintained advantage (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.13-2.43) in contrast to finerenone (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.25) and eplerenone (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.40-1.62). Sensitivity analyses which excluded observational studies and included only RCTs showed consistent results for these disease populations. But the chronic kidney disease/end-stage renal disease population exhibited different patterns: eplerenone showed optimal efficacy in primary analysis (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.32-1.20) followed by spironolactone (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49-1.06) and finerenone (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.55-1.35). Sensitivity analysis revealed better result for spironolactone in this population (HR 0.40, 0.15-1.10) followed by eplerenone (HR 0.62, 0.27-1.40) and finerenone (HR 0.87, 0.49-1.50). CONCLUSIONS MRAs exhibit varying cardiovascular protective effects depending on the disease context. These findings support tailored treatment strategies based on specific disease conditions to optimize patient outcomes. Further research with larger and more diverse datasets is needed to validate these results and inform clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiao Wang
- Department of Integrated Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Special Environment and Health Research in Xinjiang, Xinjiang, China
| | - Meijuan Zheng
- Department of Integrated Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China
| | - Yuchun Yang
- Department of Integrated Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Integrated Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mitsuboshi S, Morizumi M, Imai S, Hori S, Kotake K. Association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and kidney harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacotherapy 2025; 45:43-53. [PMID: 39578707 DOI: 10.1002/phar.4618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2024] [Revised: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024]
Abstract
Conflicting data have been reported on the association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether MRAs affect the risk of AKI. MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were comprehensively searched to extract all relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected that compared MRA versus placebo or no treatment and had study populations consisting of patients with heart or kidney disease. The primary outcome was AKI. The secondary outcome was kidney injury, including AKI and non-AKI. Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. MRAs were not associated with an increased risk of AKI (risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.46, p = 0.29, I2 = 15%, 18,065 patients, 13 RCTs, moderate certainty). For the secondary outcome, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.24-1.87, p < 0.01, I2 = 48%, 27,492 patients, 33 RCTs, low certainty). In particular, only canrenone (RR 5.39, 95% CI 2.17-13.37, p < 0.01) and spironolactone (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14, p < 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury. However, eplerenone and finerenone seem not to increase the risk of kidney injury in patients with heart or kidney disease. The selection of MRAs might influence the risk of kidney-associated events. Further studies focusing on individual MRAs may be needed to clarify these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Makoto Morizumi
- Department of Pharmacy, Ohno Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shungo Imai
- Division of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoko Hori
- Division of Drug Informatics, Keio University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Kotake
- Department of Pharmacy, Zikei Hospital/Zikei Institute of Psychiatry, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang H, Germinal K, Milfort A, Chen WH, Chang SH, Huang W, Li Y, Lu Y, Ahmed MM, Kimmel SE, Bian J, Guo J. The most effective combination of pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2024; 24:666. [PMID: 39578732 PMCID: PMC11585106 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-04339-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is growing. However, there is no consensus on the most effective treatment for HFrEF. This study aimed to evaluate the most effective combination of pharmacological therapy in patients with HFrEF. METHODS We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL up to Feb 2022, to include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of pharmacological treatment among adults (≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of HFrEF (defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45%). The outcomes of interest included all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A random network meta-analysis using a frequentist framework model was employed to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and rank the treatments. RESULTS We included 49 RCTs involving 90,529 participants with HFrEF. For reducing all-cause mortality, the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was most effective (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.66). For CV death, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Vericiguat showed the highest efficacy (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.90). Regarding reducing HHF, the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and SGLT2i as well as the combination of ACEI, BB, MRA, and Ivabradine were equally the most effective (both RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.39). CONCLUSION This study provides robust evidence supporting the use of combination therapies in HFrEF management, with newer agents offering incremental benefits when added to established guideline-directed medical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huilin Tang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kimberly Germinal
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Alexandra Milfort
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Wei-Han Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Shao-Hsuan Chang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Wenxi Huang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Yujia Li
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ying Lu
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mustafa M Ahmed
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stephen E Kimmel
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jiang Bian
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jingchuan Guo
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Adji AS, Widjaja JS, de Liyis BG. Effectiveness and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure patients with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Egypt Heart J 2024; 76:150. [PMID: 39541086 PMCID: PMC11564587 DOI: 10.1186/s43044-024-00580-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 10/28/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve outcomes in various populations of heart failure (HF) patients. However, the impact of concomitant diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), on these outcomes remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRAs in heart failure patients with and without diabetes mellitus. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to April 30, 2024. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model to account for variability across studies, and statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4. Efficacy and safety parameters were evaluated in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. RESULTS The meta-analysis included a total of 21,832 subjects from ten studies. The pooled results demonstrated that MRAs, compared to placebo, significantly reduced all-cause mortality in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 0.85; 95%CI 0.75-0.96; p = 0.009). A similar effect was observed in HF patients without DM (RR: 0.83; 95%CI 0.71-0.97; p = 0.02), while no significant effect was detected in the DM subgroup (RR: 0.87; 95%CI 0.69-1.11; p = 0.27). Both treatments had comparable effects on cardiovascular mortality in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 0.88; 95%CI 0.82-0.94; p = 0.0002), in HF patients with DM (RR: 0.90; 95%CI 0.81-1.01; p = 0.08), and in the non-DM subgroup (RR: 0.86; 95%CI 0.79-0.94; p = 0.0009). MRAs significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular mortality in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 0.82; 95%CI 0.72-0.94; p = 0.005) and in HF patients with DM (RR: 0.79; 95%CI 0.63-0.98; p = 0.03), but no significant effect was observed in the non-DM subgroup (RR: 0.85; 95%CI 0.69-1.05; p = 0.13). Furthermore, compared to placebo, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mEq/L) in HF patients with and without DM (RR: 1.63; 95%CI 1.18-2.24; p = 0.003), particularly in HF patients with DM (RR: 1.44; 95%CI 0.97-2.13; p = 0.07) and in the non-DM subgroup (RR: 1.87; 95%CI 1.34-2.61; p = 0.0002). CONCLUSION MRAs are effective in reducing all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and cardiovascular mortality in heart failure patients. However, the use of MRAs is associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia, necessitating careful monitoring, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arga Setyo Adji
- Faculty of Medicine, Hang Tuah University, Ahmad Yani Street no.1, Wonokromo, Surabaya, East Java, 60244, Indonesia.
| | - Jordan Steven Widjaja
- Faculty of Medicine, Hang Tuah University, Ahmad Yani Street no.1, Wonokromo, Surabaya, East Java, 60244, Indonesia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oraii A, Healey JS, Kowalik K, Pandey AK, Benz AP, Wong JA, Conen D, McIntyre WF. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur Heart J 2024; 45:756-774. [PMID: 38195054 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve cardiovascular outcomes in a variety of settings. This study aimed to assess whether cardioprotective effects of MRAs are modified by heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) status and to study their impact on AF events. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched to 24 March 2023 for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of MRAs as compared with placebo or usual care in reducing cardiovascular outcomes and AF events in patients with or at risk for cardiovascular diseases. Random-effects models and interaction analyses were used to test for effect modification. RESULTS Meta-analysis of seven trials (20 741 participants, mean age: 65.6 years, 32% women) showed that the efficacy of MRAs, as compared with placebo, in reducing a composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization remains consistent across patients with HF [risk ratio = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.98] and without HF (risk ratio = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.75-0.93; interaction P = .77). Among patients with HF, MRAs reduced cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization in patients with AF (hazard ratio = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.54-1.66) to a similar extent as in those without AF (hazard ratio = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.63-1.07; interaction P = .65). Pooled data from 20 trials (21 791 participants, mean age: 65.2 years, 31.3% women) showed that MRAs reduce AF events (risk ratio = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.67-0.87) in both patients with and without prior AF. CONCLUSIONS Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are similarly effective in preventing cardiovascular events in patients with and without HF and most likely retain their efficacy regardless of AF status. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may also be moderately effective in preventing incident or recurrent AF events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Oraii
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, DBVSRI C3-13A, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
| | - Jeff S Healey
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, DBVSRI C3-13A, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - Krzysztof Kowalik
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Avinash K Pandey
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander P Benz
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, DBVSRI C3-13A, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
| | - Jorge A Wong
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, DBVSRI C3-13A, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - David Conen
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, DBVSRI C3-13A, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| | - William F McIntyre
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton St East, DBVSRI C3-13A, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Geng C, Mao YC, Qi SF, Song K, Wang HF, Zhang ZY, Tian QB. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis focusing on the number needed to treat. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1236008. [PMID: 38028498 PMCID: PMC10657990 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1236008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Recent studies have shown that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) can decrease mortality in patients with heart failure; however, the application of MRAs in current clinical practice is limited because of adverse effects such as hyperkalemia that occur with treatment. Therefore, this meta-analysis used the number needed to treat (NNT) to assess the efficacy and safety of MRAs in patients with chronic heart failure. Methods We meta-analysed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which contrasted the impacts of MRAs with placebo. As of March 2023, all articles are published in English. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and adverse events. Results We incorporated seven studies with a total of 9,056 patients, 4,512 of whom received MRAs and 4,544 of whom received a placebo, with a mean follow-up period of 2.1 years. MACE, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality were all reduced by MRAs, with corresponding numbers needed to treat for benefit (NNTB) of 37, 28, and 34; as well as no impact on MI or stroke. MRAs increased the incidence of hyperkalemia and gynecomastia, with the corresponding mean number needed to treat for harm (NNTH) of 18 and 52. Conclusions This study showed that enabling one patient with HF to avoid MACE required treating 37 patients with MRAs for 2.1 years. MRAs reduce MACE, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular death; however, they increase the risk of hyperkalemia and gynecomastia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Qing-Bao Tian
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Environment and Human Health, Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Suebsaicharoen T, Chunekamrai P, Yingchoncharoen T, Tansawet A, Issarawattana T, Numthavaj P, Thakkinstian A. Comparative cardiovascular outcomes of novel drugs as an addition to conventional triple therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Open Heart 2023; 10:e002364. [PMID: 37940331 PMCID: PMC10632908 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, there is no head-to-head comparison of novel pharmacological treatments for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A network meta-analysis aimed to compare effects of both conventional and alternative drug combinations on time to develop primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalisation (PCO). METHODS Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from Medline, Scopus up to June 2021. The RCTs were included if comparing any single or combination of drugs, that is, ACE inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), ivabradine (IVA), angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), soluble guanylyl cyclase and omecamtiv mecarbil and reporting PCO. Data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves, individual patient data were generated. A mixed-effect Weibull regression was applied. Median time to PCO, HRs with 95% CI were estimated accordingly. Our findings suggested that ACEI+BB+MRA+SGLT2i, BB+MRA+ARNI, and ACEI+BB+MRA+IVA had lower probability of PCOs than the conventional triple therapy (ACEI+BB+MRA). RESULTS Median time to PCOs of ACEI+BB+MRA was 57.7 months whereas median times to those new combinations were longer than 57.7 months. In addition, the three new regimens had a significantly lower PCO risks than ACEI+BB+MRA, with the HRs (95% CI) of 0.51 (0.43 to 0.61), 0.55 (0.46 to 0.65) and 0.56 (0.47 to 0.67), accordingly. CONCLUSION This study suggested that SGLT2i, ARNI and IVA in addition to ACEI+BB+MRA may be better in prolonging time to develop PCO in HFrEF patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Puri Chunekamrai
- Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhon Nayok, Thailand
| | - Teerapat Yingchoncharoen
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Amarit Tansawet
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thanaphruet Issarawattana
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pawin Numthavaj
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ammarin Thakkinstian
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Batchelor RJ, Nan Tie E, Romero L, Hopper I, Kaye DM. Meta-Analysis on Drug and Device Therapy of New York Heart Association Functional Class IV Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Am J Cardiol 2023; 188:52-60. [PMID: 36473305 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV symptoms. Decades of discovery have heralded significant advancements in the pharmacologic management of HFrEF. However, patients with NYHA IV symptoms remain an under-represented population in almost every clinical trial to date, leaving clinicians with limited evidence with which to guide drug treatment decisions in this patient group with severe heart failure. Randomized controlled trials of adult patients with NYHA IV symptoms of HFrEF randomized to current guideline-recommended medical therapy were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The outcomes of interest included the rate of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure hospitalization. A total of 39 randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 6 studies examined angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, with meta-analyses of 2 demonstrating a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.97, p = 0.03). A total of 11 studies examined β blockers, with meta-analysis of 6 demonstrating a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.92, p = 0.008). A study examined the mineralocorticoid antagonist spironolactone, reporting a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in the NYHA IV subgroup. A total of 6 studies examined device therapy, demonstrating the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable cardiac defibrillator in reducing hospitalization in the NYHA IV subgroup. Although trial evidence exists for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid antagonist therapy in the NYHA IV population, the role of angiotensin receptor blockers is unclear. Ivabradine, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors remain underinvestigated and have not been proved to provide any benefit above standard heart failure therapy in patients with HFrEF and NYHA IV symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riley J Batchelor
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Emilia Nan Tie
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lorena Romero
- The Ian Potter Library, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ingrid Hopper
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David M Kaye
- Department of Cardiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Heart Failure Research, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lorente-Ros M, Aguilar-Gallardo JS, Shah A, Narasimhan B, Aronow WS. An overview of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as a treatment option for patients with heart failure: the current state-of-the-art and future outlook. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:1737-1751. [PMID: 36262014 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2138744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure. These benefits of MRAs vary in different heart failure populations based on left ventricular ejection fraction and associated comorbidities. AREAS COVERED We define the pharmacologic properties of MRAs and the pathophysiological rationale for their utility in heart failure. We outline the current literature on the use of MRAs in different heart failure populations, including reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF/HFpEF) and acute heart failure decompensation. Finally, we describe the limitations of currently available data and propose future directions of study. EXPERT OPINION While there is strong evidence supporting the use of MRAs in HFrEF, evidence in patients with HFpEF or acute heart failure is less definitive. Comorbidities such as obesity or atrial fibrillation could be clinical modifiers of the response to MRAs and potentially alter the risk/benefit ratio in these subpopulations. Emerging evidence for new non-steroidal MRAs reveal promising preliminary results that, if confirmed in large randomized clinical trials, could favor a change in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Lorente-Ros
- Department of Medicine, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Aayush Shah
- DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bharat Narasimhan
- DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wilbert S Aronow
- Department of Cardiology, New York Medical College, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
De Marzo V, Savarese G, Tricarico L, Hassan S, Iacoviello M, Porto I, Ameri P. Network meta-analysis of medical therapy efficacy in more than 90,000 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. J Intern Med 2022; 292:333-349. [PMID: 35332595 PMCID: PMC9546056 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following the availability of new drugs for chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), we sought to provide an updated and comparative synthesis of the evidence on HFrEF pharmacotherapy efficacy. METHODS We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis of phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medical therapy in HFrEF patient cohorts with more than 90% of the participants with left ventricular ejection fraction less than 45% and all-cause mortality reported. RESULTS Sixty-nine RCTs, accounting for 91,741 subjects, were evaluated. The step-wise introduction of new drugs progressively decreased the risk of all-cause death, up to reaching a random-effects hazard ratio (HR) of 0.43 (95% credible intervals [CrI] 0.27-0.63) with beta blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) versus placebo. The risk was further reduced by adding sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i; HR 0.38, 95% CrI 0.22-0.60), ivabradine (HR 0.39, 95% CrI 0.21-0.64), or vericiguat (HR 0.40, 95% CrI 0.22-0.65) to neurohormonal inhibitors, and by angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), BB, and MRA (HR 0.36, 95% CrI 0.20-0.60). In a sensitivity analysis considering the ARNI and non-ARNI subgroups of SGLT2i RCTs, the combination SGLT2i + ARNI + BB + MRA was associated with the lowest HR (0.28, 95% CrI 0.16-0.45 vs. 0.40, 95% CrI 0.24-0.60 for SGLT2i + BB + ACEi + MRA). Consistent results were obtained in sensitivity analyses and by calculating surface under the cumulative ranking area, as well as for cardiovascular mortality (information available for 56 RCTs), HF hospitalization (45 RCTs), and all-cause hospitalization (26 RCTs). CONCLUSIONS Combination medical therapy including neurohormonal inhibitors and newer drugs, especially ARNI and SGLT2i, confers the maximum benefit with regard to HFrEF prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Division of CardiologyDepartment of MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Lucia Tricarico
- Cardiology UnitOspedali Riuniti di FoggiaFoggiaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly
| | - Sofia Hassan
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of GenovaGenovaItaly
| | - Massimo Iacoviello
- Cardiology UnitOspedali Riuniti di FoggiaFoggiaItaly
- Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesUniversity of FoggiaFoggiaItaly
| | - Italo Porto
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of GenovaGenovaItaly
- Cardiology UnitCardio‐Thoracic and Vascular DepartmentIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenovaItaly
| | - Pietro Ameri
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of GenovaGenovaItaly
- Cardiology UnitCardio‐Thoracic and Vascular DepartmentIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoGenovaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ageev FT. [Three ages of spironolactone. Evolution of views on spironolactone capabilities in the treatment of patients with heart failure.]. KARDIOLOGIIA 2022; 62:3-11. [PMID: 35989624 DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2022.7.n2233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The article describes the history of the discovery of aldosterone and the creation of its antagonist, spironolactone. The effects of aldosterone associated with the stimulation of two types of receptors. Long-term effect (nuclear or genomic) and fast - term (membrane). They are manifested not only by the influence on the water-salt metabolism and the volume of extracellular fluid, but also in the regulation of vascular tone and elasticity of the vascular wall and, most interestingly, the effect on cardiac remodeling. Early after its development Spironolactone was considered as a medicine for water-salt metabolism regulation, diuresis and normalization of blood pressure. In the following period, Spironolactone embraced a new area - systolic heart failure. The drug was considered not only to enhance safe diuresis, but also to eliminate the phenomenon of escape of the antialdosterone effect angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The change in the paradigm of heart failure towards the prevailing changes in her diastolic phenotype, which is based on excessive diffuse myocardial fibrosis, changed role of spironolactone in the treatment of heart failure. Currently, it is considered as an independent drug, due to its powerful antifibrotic effect, blocking which controls the whole complex of endo- and paracrine effects of aldosterone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F T Ageev
- Federal State Budgetary Institution NATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF CARDIOLOGY NAMED AFTER ACADEMICIAN E.I.CHAZOV. Of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tromp J, Ouwerkerk W, Lam CSP, Voors AA. Reply: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment of HFrEF. JACC. HEART FAILURE 2022; 10:293-294. [PMID: 35361454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
|
13
|
Role and Mechanism of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System in the Onset and Development of Cardiorenal Syndrome. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2022; 2022:3239057. [PMID: 35111237 PMCID: PMC8803448 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3239057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS), a clinical syndrome involving multiple pathological mechanisms, exhibits high morbidity and mortality. According to the primary activity of the disease, CRS can be divided into cardiorenal syndrome (type I and type II), renal heart syndrome (type III and type IV), and secondary heart and kidney disease (type V). The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is an important humoral regulatory system of the body that exists widely in various tissues and organs. As a compensatory mechanism, the RAAS is typically activated to participate in the regulation of target organ function. RAAS activation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of CRS. The RAAS induces the onset and development of CRS by mediating oxidative stress, uremic toxin overload, and asymmetric dimethylarginine production. Research on the mechanism of RAAS-induced CRS can provide multiple intervention methods that are of great significance for reducing end-stage organ damage and further improving the quality of life of patients with CRS.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lunney M, Ruospo M, Natale P, Quinn RR, Ronksley PE, Konstantinidis I, Palmer SC, Tonelli M, Strippoli GF, Ravani P. Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 2:CD012466. [PMID: 32103487 PMCID: PMC7044419 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012466.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately half of people with heart failure have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD have the potential to reduce death (any cause) or hospitalisations for decompensated heart failure. However, these interventions are of uncertain benefit and may increase the risk of harm, such as hypotension and electrolyte abnormalities, in those with CKD. OBJECTIVES This review aims to look at the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions for HF (i.e., antihypertensive agents, inotropes, and agents that may improve the heart performance indirectly) in people with HF and CKD. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies through 12 September 2019 in consultation with an Information Specialist and using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of any pharmacological intervention for acute or chronic heart failure, among people of any age with chronic kidney disease of at least three months duration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened the records to identify eligible studies and extracted data on the following dichotomous outcomes: death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure, worsening kidney function, hyperkalaemia, and hypotension. We used random effects meta-analysis to estimate treatment effects, which we expressed as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. We applied the GRADE methodology to rate the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS One hundred and twelve studies met our selection criteria: 15 were studies of adults with CKD; 16 studies were conducted in the general population but provided subgroup data for people with CKD; and 81 studies included individuals with CKD, however, data for this subgroup were not provided. The risk of bias in all 112 studies was frequently high or unclear. Of the 31 studies (23,762 participants) with data on CKD patients, follow-up ranged from three months to five years, and study size ranged from 16 to 2916 participants. In total, 26 studies (19,612 participants) reported disaggregated and extractable data on at least one outcome of interest for our review and were included in our meta-analyses. In acute heart failure, the effects of adenosine A1-receptor antagonists, dopamine, nesiritide, or serelaxin on death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure or kidney function, hyperkalaemia, hypotension or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. In chronic heart failure, the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (4 studies, 5003 participants: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; I2 = 78%; low certainty evidence), aldosterone antagonists (2 studies, 34 participants: RR 0.61 95% CI 0.06 to 6.59; very low certainty evidence), and vasopressin receptor antagonists (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.89; 2 studies, 1840 participants; low certainty evidence) on death (any cause) were uncertain. Treatment with beta-blockers may reduce the risk of death (any cause) (4 studies, 3136 participants: RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.79; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Treatment with ACEi or ARB (2 studies, 1368 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.90; I2 = 97%; very low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on hospitalisation for heart failure, as treatment estimates were consistent with either benefit or harm. Treatment with beta-blockers may decrease hospitalisation for heart failure (3 studies, 2287 participants: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.05; I2 = 87%; low certainty evidence). Aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia compared to placebo or no treatment (3 studies, 826 participants: RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.03 to 4.17; I2 = 0%; low certainty evidence). Renin inhibitors had uncertain risks of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 142 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.49; I2 = 0%; very low certainty). We were unable to estimate whether treatment with sinus node inhibitors affects the risk of hyperkalaemia, as there were few studies and meta-analysis was not possible. Hyperkalaemia was not reported for the CKD subgroup in studies investigating other therapies. The effects of ACEi or ARB, or aldosterone antagonists on worsening heart failure or kidney function, hypotension, or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. Effects of anti-arrhythmic agents, digoxin, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, renin inhibitors, sinus node inhibitors, vasodilators, and vasopressin receptor antagonists were very uncertain due to the paucity of studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The effects of pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD are uncertain and there is insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. Study data for treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure and CKD are sparse despite the potential impact of kidney impairment on the benefits and harms of treatment. Future research aimed at analysing existing data in general population HF studies to explore the effect in subgroups of patients with CKD, considering stage of disease, may yield valuable insights for the management of people with HF and CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meaghan Lunney
- University of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1
| | - Marinella Ruospo
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
- University of Bari, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy
| | - Patrizia Natale
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
- University of Bari, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy
| | - Robert R Quinn
- University of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
| | - Paul E Ronksley
- University of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1
| | - Ioannis Konstantinidis
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Medicine, 3459 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 15213
| | - Suetonia C Palmer
- Christchurch Hospital, University of Otago, Department of Medicine, Nephrologist, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Marcello Tonelli
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
| | - Giovanni Fm Strippoli
- The University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, Australia
- University of Bari, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Bari, Italy
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145
| | - Pietro Ravani
- University of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4N1
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tseng AS, Kunze KL, Lee JZ, Amin M, Neville MR, Almader-Douglas D, Killu AM, Madhavan M, Cha YM, Asirvatham SJ, Friedman PA, Gersh BJ, Mulpuru SK. Efficacy of Pharmacologic and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019; 12:e006951. [PMID: 31159582 DOI: 10.1161/circep.118.006951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background The treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction has been the subject of numerous randomized controlled trials involving medications and cardiac implantable electronic device therapies. As newer effective pharmacological therapies suggest significant reductions in all-cause mortality, the role of additional device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction deserves further scrutiny. Methods A systematic review and network meta-analysis on the effect of medication and device therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on all-cause mortality was performed. Randomized controlled trials published between January 1980 and July 2017 were identified using Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials databases. Pcnetmeta package in R was used to calculate treatment arm-based estimated rates, rate ratios, and probability ranks with 95% credible intervals. Results Combination therapy of ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors or ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers) with β-blockers (BBs) alone or in addition to implantable cardiac defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators demonstrated a significant reduction of all-cause mortality when compared with placebo. By probability rank, implantable cardiac defibrillator+ACE inhibitor or ARB+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, implantable cardiac defibrillator+ACE inhibitor or ARB+BB, and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist combination therapies have the highest probability of being ranked the best treatment. There was no significant difference in the rate of mortality when comparing angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist to implantable cardiac defibrillator+optimal pharmacological combination therapy. Conclusions BB and renin-angiotensin system blockers alone or in combination with defibrillator device therapy have robust evidence for a reduction in mortality compared with placebo. The comparative efficacy of pharmacological therapy with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and device therapy deserves further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine (A.S.T.), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Katie L Kunze
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (K.L.K., M.R.N.), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Justin Z Lee
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.Z.L., S.K.M.), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix
| | - Mustapha Amin
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (M.A., A.M.K., M.M., Y.-M.C., S.J.A., P.A.F., B.J.G.)
| | - Matthew R Neville
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (K.L.K., M.R.N.), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix
| | | | - Ammar M Killu
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (M.A., A.M.K., M.M., Y.-M.C., S.J.A., P.A.F., B.J.G.)
| | - Malini Madhavan
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (M.A., A.M.K., M.M., Y.-M.C., S.J.A., P.A.F., B.J.G.)
| | - Yong-Mei Cha
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (M.A., A.M.K., M.M., Y.-M.C., S.J.A., P.A.F., B.J.G.)
| | - Samuel J Asirvatham
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (M.A., A.M.K., M.M., Y.-M.C., S.J.A., P.A.F., B.J.G.)
| | - Paul A Friedman
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (M.A., A.M.K., M.M., Y.-M.C., S.J.A., P.A.F., B.J.G.)
| | - Bernard J Gersh
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (M.A., A.M.K., M.M., Y.-M.C., S.J.A., P.A.F., B.J.G.)
| | - Siva K Mulpuru
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.Z.L., S.K.M.), Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bounthavong M, Butler J, Dolan CM, Dunn JD, Fisher KA, Oestreicher N, Pitt B, Hauptman PJ, Veenstra DL. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Patiromer and Spironolactone Therapy in Heart Failure Patients with Hyperkalemia. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2018; 36:1463-1473. [PMID: 30194623 PMCID: PMC6244629 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0709-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Certain patients with heart failure (HF) are unable to tolerate spironolactone therapy due to hyperkalemia. Patiromer is a novel agent used to treat hyperkalemia and has been shown to be efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated. The potential clinical outcomes and economic value of using patiromer and spironolactone in patients with HF unable to otherwise tolerate spironolactone due to hyperkalemia are unclear. The objective of this analysis was to model the potential pharmacoeconomic value of using patiromer and spironolactone in patients with a history of hyperkalemia that prevents them from utilizing spironolactone. METHODS We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment with patiromer, spironolactone, and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV HF compared with ACEI alone. A Markov model was constructed to simulate a cohort of 65-year-old patients diagnosed with HF from the payer perspective across the lifetime horizon. Clinical inputs were derived from the RALES and OPAL-HK randomized trials of spironolactone and patiromer, respectively. Utility estimates and costs were derived from the literature and list prices. Outcomes assessed included hospitalization, life expectancy, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probability sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model findings. RESULTS Treatment with patiromer-spironolactone-ACEI was projected to increase longevity compared with ACEI alone (5.29 vs. 4.62 life-years gained, respectively), greater QALYs (2.79 vs. 2.60), and costs (US$28,200 vs. US$18,200), giving an ICER of US$52,700 per QALY gained. The ICERs ranged from US$40,000 to US$85,800 per QALY gained in 1-way sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the use of spironolactone-patiromer-ACEI may provide clinical benefit and good economic value in patients with NYHA class III-IV HF unable to tolerate spironolactone due to hyperkalemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Bounthavong
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, HSB H375-P, Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195-7630, USA
| | - Javed Butler
- Division of Cardiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Nina Oestreicher
- Epidemiology, HEOR and Observational Research, Relypsa, Inc., a Vifor Pharma Group Company, Redwood City, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bertram Pitt
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Paul J Hauptman
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MI, USA
| | - David L Veenstra
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, HSB H375-P, Box 357630, Seattle, WA, 98195-7630, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mouriño López V, Cid Conde L, Alves Pérez M, López Castro J. Long-term survival of a cohort of patients with heart failure: Perspective from the real world. Eur Geriatr Med 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurger.2017.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
18
|
Jin XL, Huang N, Shang H, Zhou MC, Hong Y, Cai WZ, Huang J. Diagnosis of chronic heart failure by the soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. J Clin Lab Anal 2017; 32. [PMID: 28719009 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our study was to explore the roles between serum soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) while evaluating ventricular function to properly diagnose chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS In total, 197 CHF patients were recruited and classified into ventricular function's II, III, and IV groups, and 106 healthy people into normal control group. To detect concentrations of Sst2 and NT-proBNP, ELISA and electro-chemiluminescence immuno assay were implemented. An automatic biochemical analyzer was used to determine the levels of the following: blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and uric acid (UA). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was adopted to detect the diagnostic value sST2 and NT-ProBNP in CHF and the logistic regression analysis involving the risk factors of CHF. RESULTS Serum sST2 and NT-proBNP concentrations were increased significantly in the ventricular function's II, III, and IV groups in a manner dependent on concentration as opposed to the manner the normal control group occupied. The area under the curve (AUC) of sST2, found NT-proBNP and sST2+NT-proBNP to be 0.942 (95% CI: 0.917-0.966), 0.920 (95% CI: 0.891-0.948), and 0.968 (95% CI: 0.953-0.984), respectively. sST2, NT-proBNP, UA, and Cr were verified as important risk factors of CHF. CONCLUSION Serum sST2 and NT-ProBNP could act as diagnostic indicators for CHF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Ling Jin
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Ning Huang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China
| | - Hui Shang
- Department of Medical Engineering, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Ming-Cheng Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, The First Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Hong
- Department of Cardiology, The First Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Zheng Cai
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Huang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Rehabilitation Hospital of Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Burnett H, Earley A, Voors AA, Senni M, McMurray JJV, Deschaseaux C, Cope S. Thirty Years of Evidence on the Efficacy of Drug Treatments for Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Network Meta-Analysis. Circ Heart Fail 2017; 10:e003529. [PMID: 28087688 PMCID: PMC5265698 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.116.003529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatments that reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), β-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), have not been studied in a head-to-head fashion. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of these drugs and their combinations regarding all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS A systematic literature review identified 57 randomized controlled trials published between 1987 and 2015, which were compared in terms of study and patient characteristics, baseline risk, outcome definitions, and the observed treatment effects. Despite differences identified in terms of study duration, New York Heart Association class, ejection fraction, and use of background digoxin, a network meta-analysis was considered feasible and all trials were analyzed simultaneously. The random-effects network meta-analysis suggested that the combination of ACEI+BB+MRA was associated with a 56% reduction in mortality versus placebo (hazard ratio 0.44, 95% credible interval 0.26-0.66); ARNI+BB+MRA was associated with the greatest reduction in all-cause mortality versus placebo (hazard ratio 0.37, 95% credible interval 0.19-0.65). A sensitivity analysis that did not account for background therapy suggested that ARNI monotherapy is more efficacious than ACEI or ARB monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The network meta-analysis showed that treatment with ACEI, ARB, BB, MRA, and ARNI and their combinations were better than the treatment with placebo in reducing all-cause mortality, with the exception of ARB monotherapy and ARB plus ACEI. The combination of ARNI+BB+MRA resulted in the greatest mortality reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Burnett
- From the Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Dundas, Canada (H.B.); Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA (A.E.); Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (A.A.V.); Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.); Global Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland (C.D.); and Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Toronto, Canada (S.C.).
| | - Amy Earley
- From the Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Dundas, Canada (H.B.); Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA (A.E.); Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (A.A.V.); Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.); Global Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland (C.D.); and Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Toronto, Canada (S.C.)
| | - Adriaan A Voors
- From the Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Dundas, Canada (H.B.); Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA (A.E.); Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (A.A.V.); Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.); Global Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland (C.D.); and Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Toronto, Canada (S.C.)
| | - Michele Senni
- From the Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Dundas, Canada (H.B.); Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA (A.E.); Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (A.A.V.); Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.); Global Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland (C.D.); and Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Toronto, Canada (S.C.)
| | - John J V McMurray
- From the Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Dundas, Canada (H.B.); Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA (A.E.); Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (A.A.V.); Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.); Global Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland (C.D.); and Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Toronto, Canada (S.C.)
| | - Celine Deschaseaux
- From the Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Dundas, Canada (H.B.); Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA (A.E.); Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (A.A.V.); Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.); Global Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland (C.D.); and Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Toronto, Canada (S.C.)
| | - Shannon Cope
- From the Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Dundas, Canada (H.B.); Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston, MA (A.E.); Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands (A.A.V.); Cardiovascular Department, Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy (M.S.); British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.); Global Patient Access, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland (C.D.); and Mapi, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Toronto, Canada (S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Berbenetz NM, Mrkobrada M. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2016; 16:246. [PMID: 27905877 PMCID: PMC5134129 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 11/25/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been associated with improved patient outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but not preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of selective and nonselective MRAs in HFrEF and HFpEF. Methods We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE. We included randomized controlled trials (RCT) of MRAs in adults with HFpEF or HFrEF if they reported data on major adverse cardiac events or drug safety. Results We identified 15 studies representing 16321 patients. MRAs were associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular death (RR 0.81 [0.75–0.87], I2 0%), all-cause mortality (RR 0.83 [0.77–0.88], I2 0%), and cardiac hospitalizations (RR 0.80 [0.70–0.92], I2 58.4%). However, an a-priori specified subgroup analysis demonstrated that these benefits were limited to HFrEF (cardiovascular death RR 0.79 [0.73–0.86], I2 0%; all-cause mortality RR 0.81 [0.75–0.87], I2 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.76 [0.64–0.90], I2 68%), but not HFpEF (all-cause mortality RR 0.92 [0.79–1.08], I2 0%; cardiac hospitalizations RR 0.91 [0.67–1.24], I2 17%). MRAs increased the risk of hyperkalemia (RR 2.03 [1.78–2.31], I2 0%). Nonselective MRAs, but not selective MRAs increased the risk of gynecomastia (RR 7.37 [4.42–12.30], I2 0% vs. RR 0.74 [0.43–1.27], I2 0%). Evidence was of moderate quality for cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations; and high-quality for hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. Conclusions MRAs reduce the risk of adverse cardiac events in HFrEF but not HFpEF. MRA use in HFpEF increases the risk of harm from hyperkalemia and gynecomastia. Selective MRAs are equally effective as nonselective MRAs, without a risk of gynecomastia. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0425-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas M Berbenetz
- Department of Medicine, Western University, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada
| | - Marko Mrkobrada
- Department of Medicine, Western University, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON, N6A 5A5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on the risk of thrombosis, bleeding and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Thromb Res 2016; 144:32-9. [PMID: 27270220 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.04.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 04/26/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
22
|
A novel role for the mineralocorticoid receptor in glucocorticoid driven vascular calcification. Vascul Pharmacol 2016; 86:87-93. [PMID: 27153999 PMCID: PMC5111541 DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Vascular calcification, which is common in the elderly and in patients with atherosclerosis, diabetes and chronic renal disease, increases the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is a complex, active and highly regulated cellular process that resembles physiological bone formation. It has previously been established that pharmacological doses of glucocorticoids facilitate arterial calcification. However, the consequences for vascular calcification of endogenous glucocorticoid elevation have yet to be established. Glucocorticoids (cortisol, corticosterone) are released from the adrenal gland, but can also be generated within cells from 11-keto metabolites of glucocorticoids (cortisone, 11-dehydrocorticosterone [11-DHC]) by the enzyme, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1). In the current study we hypothesized that endogenous glucocorticoids facilitate vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) calcification and investigated the receptor-mediated mechanism underpinning this process. In vitro studies revealed increased phosphate-induced calcification in mouse VSMCs following treatment for 7 days with corticosterone (100 nM; 7.98 fold; P < 0.01), 11-DHC (100 nM; 7.14 fold; P < 0.05) and dexamethasone (10 nM; 7.16 fold; P < 0.05), a synthetic glucocorticoid used as a positive control. Inhibition of 11β-HSD isoenzymes by 10 μM carbenoxolone reduced the calcification induced by 11-DHC (0.37 fold compared to treatment with 11-DHC alone; P < 0.05). The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone (10 μM) had no effect on VSMC calcification in response to corticosterone or 11-DHC. In contrast, the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonist eplerenone (10 μM) significantly decreased corticosterone- (0.81 fold compared to treatment with corticosterone alone; P < 0.01) and 11-DHC-driven (0.64 fold compared to treatment with 11-DHC alone; P < 0.01) VSMC calcification, suggesting this glucocorticoid effect is MR-driven and not GR-driven. Neither corticosterone nor 11-DHC altered the mRNA levels of the osteogenic markers PiT-1, Osx and Bmp2. However, DAPI staining of pyknotic nuclei and flow cytometry analysis of surface Annexin V expression showed that corticosterone induced apoptosis in VSMCs. This study suggests that in mouse VSMCs, corticosterone acts through the MR to induce pro-calcification effects, and identifies 11β-HSD-inhibition as a novel potential treatment for vascular calcification.
Collapse
|
23
|
Le HH, El-Khatib C, Mombled M, Guitarian F, Al-Gobari M, Fall M, Janiaud P, Marchant I, Cucherat M, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Gueyffier F. Impact of Aldosterone Antagonists on Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention in Heart Failure and Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0145958. [PMID: 26891235 PMCID: PMC4758660 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2015] [Accepted: 12/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a severe burden of modern medicine. Aldosterone antagonist is publicized as effective in reducing mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) or post myocardial infarction (MI). Our study aimed to assess the efficacy of AAs on mortality including SCD, hospitalization admission and several common adverse effects. Methods We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library and clinicaltrial.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assigning AAs in patients with HF or post MI through May 2015. The comparator included standard medication or placebo, or both. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Event rates were compared using a random effects model. Prospective RCTs of AAs with durations of at least 8 weeks were selected if they included at least one of the following outcomes: SCD, all-cause/cardiovascular mortality, all-cause/cardiovascular hospitalization and common side effects (hyperkalemia, renal function degradation and gynecomastia). Results Data from 19,333 patients enrolled in 25 trials were included. In patients with HF, this treatment significantly reduced the risk of SCD by 19% (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67–0.98; p = 0.03); all-cause mortality by 19% (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.74–0.88, p<0.00001) and cardiovascular death by 21% (RR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.89, p<0.00001). In patients with post-MI, the matching reduced risks were 20% (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66–0.98; p = 0.03), 15% (RR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76–0.95, p = 0.003) and 17% (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74–0.94, p = 0.003), respectively. Concerning both subgroups, the relative risks respectively decreased by 19% (RR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.71–0.92; p = 0.002) for SCD, 18% (RR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.88, p < 0.0001) for all-cause mortality and 20% (RR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74–0.87, p < 0.0001) for cardiovascular mortality in patients treated with AAs. As well, hospitalizations were significantly reduced, while common adverse effects were significantly increased. Conclusion Aldosterone antagonists appear to be effective in reducing SCD and other mortality events, compared with placebo or standard medication in patients with HF and/or after a MI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hai-Ha Le
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - Chadia El-Khatib
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - Margaux Mombled
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - Frédéric Guitarian
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - Muaamar Al-Gobari
- Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Institute of social & preventive medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mor Fall
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - Perrine Janiaud
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - Ivanny Marchant
- Escuela de Medicina, Departamento de Pre-clínicas, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
| | - Michel Cucherat
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
| | - Théodora Bejan-Angoulvant
- CHRU de Tours, Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France
- CNRS UMR 7292, Tours, France
- Université François-Rabelais, GICC, Tours, France
| | - François Gueyffier
- Laboratoire de Biologie et Biométrie Evolutive - Equipe Modélisation des Effets Thérapeutiques, UMR 5558 Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Lyon, France
- Service de Pharmacologie Clinique et essais thérapeutiques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Garg R, Adler GK. Aldosterone and the Mineralocorticoid Receptor: Risk Factors for Cardiometabolic Disorders. Curr Hypertens Rep 2016; 17:52. [PMID: 26068659 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-015-0567-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical studies have convincingly demonstrated a role for the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) in adipose tissue physiology. These studies show that increased MR activation causes adipocyte dysfunction leading to decreased production of insulin-sensitizing products and increased production of inflammatory factors, creating an environment conducive to metabolic and cardiovascular disease. Accumulating data also suggest that MR activation may be an important link between obesity and metabolic syndrome. Moreover, MR activation may mediate the pathogenic consequences of metabolic syndrome. Recent attempts at reversing cardiometabolic damage in patients with type 2 diabetes using MR antagonists have shown promising results. MR antagonists are already used to treat heart failure where their use decreases mortality and morbidity over and above the use of traditional therapies alone. However, more data are needed to establish the benefits of MR antagonists in diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajesh Garg
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 221 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vizzardi E, Regazzoni V, Caretta G, Gavazzoni M, Sciatti E, Bonadei I, Trichaki E, Raddino R, Metra M. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in heart failure: Past, present and future perspectives. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY. HEART & VESSELS 2014; 3:6-14. [PMID: 29450163 PMCID: PMC5801434 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Accepted: 03/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Aldosterone is involved in various deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system, including sodium and fluid retention, myocardial fibrosis, vascular stiffening, endothelial dysfunction, catecholamine release and stimulation of cardiac arrhythmias. Therefore, aldosterone receptor blockade may have several potential benefits in patients with cardiovascular disease. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to prevent many of the maladaptive effects of aldosterone, in particular among patients with heart failure (HF). Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy of MRA in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, both in patients with NYHA functional classes III and IV and in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic patients (NYHA classes I and II). Recent data in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are encouraging. MRA could also have anti-arrhythmic effects on atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and may be helpful in patient ischemic heart disease through prevention of myocardial fibrosis and vascular damage. This article aims to discuss the pathophysiological effects of aldosterone in patients with cardiovascular disease and to review the current data that support the use of MRA in heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Vizzardi
- Corresponding author. Tel.: + 39 303995679; fax: + 39 303996801Corresponding author.Tel.: + 39 303995679; fax: + 39 303996801
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|