The use of cone-beam computed tomography to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones

The Role of Routine Plain Film Imaging Post Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of routine post-op X-ray in cochlear implantation patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review study.

SETTING

Primary or revision cochlear implant patients who had routine postoperative X-ray (XR) or had planned postoperative computed tomography (CT) due to clinical concerns for array malposition.

METHODS

All images were reviewed, and those were considered abnormal if there was a bent tip, kinking, incomplete insertion, or if the electrode array didn't follow the expected cochlear curvature. Postoperative CT scans were performed in patients with abnormal postoperation X-ray, or if there were abnormal surgical findings encountered during insertion which raised the suspicion for suboptimal placement.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients with a mean age of 64.8 ± 18.9 years were included. XRs were performed in 188 patients and others had CT scan from the beginning. Only 2 out of 188 patients had abnormal findings on XR, which showed malposition of the electrode in one patient and a tip fold over and incomplete insertion in the other one. Both patients with abnormal findings had labyrinthitis ossificans. The patient with tip fold over ultimately underwent re-implantation. Another patient with incomplete insertion had required extended basal turn drilling during implantation, and no additional measures were taken.

CONCLUSION

Routine XR findings did not provide the reason for additional intervention, and its benefit for patients without demonstrable cochlear abnormalities was minimal. Post-op XR can be informative in selected high risk patients, but CT imaging is a reasonable alternative to better define anatomic array location in patients particularly at risk.

Exploring Trauma Patterns and Contributing Factors With Slim Straight Electrode Array After Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To assess trauma patterns associated with the insertion of lateral wall electrode arrays. The study focused on 3 categories-scala tympani (ST), intermediate, and scala vestibuli (SV)-to identify traumatic patterns and contributing factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Data from 106 cochlear implant recipients at a tertiary otologic center.

METHODS

Demographic and surgical data were collected from recipients who underwent cochlear implantation manually and with RobOtol®. Measurements included cochlear dimensions, angular depth of insertion, and position of the first electrode. Three-dimensional reconstructions were used to analyze the electrode array location relative to the basilar membrane, categorized into ST, intermediate, and SV electrodes. Nontraumatic insertion was defined as all electrodes in the ST, while traumatic insertions had 1 or more electrodes in intermediate or SV locations.

RESULTS

Out of 106 cases, 44% had nontraumatic and 56% had traumatic insertions. Demographic and surgical characteristics showed no association with traumatic insertions. A deeper position of the first electrode, relative to the round window, was associated with traumatic insertions (P = .03). Three trauma patterns were observed: distal (facing the apical electrodes), proximal (facing the middle electrodes around 180°), and distal/proximal.

CONCLUSION

This study considers the intermediate position which could be associated with basilar membrane lesions. Risk zones for intracochlear trauma with lateral wall arrays were identified distally and proximally. Traumatic insertions were independently linked to deeper array placement. Future studies should explore whether gentler insertion, without insisting on further electrode array insertion depth, could reduce the trauma during cochlear implantation.

Automatic localization of cochlear implant electrodes using cone beam computed tomography images

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implants (CI) are implantable medical devices that enable the perception of sounds and the understanding of speech by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve in case of inner ear damage. The stimulation takes place via an array of electrodes surgically inserted in the cochlea. After CI implantation, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is used to evaluate the position of the electrodes. Moreover, CBCT is used in research studies to investigate the relationship between the position of the electrodes and the hearing outcome of CI user. In clinical routine, the estimation of the position of the CI electrodes is done manually, which is very time-consuming.

RESULTS

The aim of this study was to optimize procedures of automatic electrode localization from CBCT data following CI implantation. For this, we analyzed the performance of automatic electrode localization for 150 CBCT data sets of 10 different types of electrode arrays. Our own implementation of the method by Noble and Dawant (Lecture notes in computer science (Including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), Springer, pp 152-159, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24571-3_19 ) for automated electrode localization served as a benchmark for evaluation. Differences in the detection rate and the localization accuracy across types of electrode arrays were evaluated and errors were classified. Based on this analysis, we developed a strategy to optimize procedures of automatic electrode localization. It was shown that particularly distantly spaced electrodes in combination with a deep insertion can lead to apical-basal confusions in the localization procedure. This confusion prevents electrodes from being detected or assigned correctly, leading to a deterioration in localization accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose an extended cost function for automatic electrode localization methods that prevents double detection of electrodes to avoid apical-basal confusions. This significantly increased the detection rate by 11.15 percent points and improved the overall localization accuracy by 0.53 mm (1.75 voxels). In comparison to other methods, our proposed cost function does not require any prior knowledge about the individual cochlea anatomy.

Automatic electrode scalar location assessment after cochlear implantation using a novel imaging software

As of today, image-based assessment of cochlear implant electrode array location is not part of the clinical routine. Low resolution and contrast of computer tomography (CT) imaging, as well as electrode array artefacts, prevent visibility of intracochlear structures and result in low accuracy in determining location of the electrode array. Further, trauma assessment based on clinical-CT images requires a uniform image-based trauma scaling. Goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel imaging software to detect electrode scalar location. Six cadaveric temporal bones were implanted with Advanced Bionics SlimJ and Mid-Scala electrode arrays. Clinical-CT scans were taken pre- and postoperatively. In addition, micro-CTs were taken post-operatively for validation. The electrode scalar location rating done by the software was compared to the rating of two experienced otosurgeons and the micro-CT images. A 3-step electrode scalar location grading scale (0 = electrode in scala tympani, 1 = interaction of electrode with basilar membrane/osseous spiral lamina, 2 = translocation of electrode into scala vestibuli) was introduced for the assessment. The software showed a high sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.7% for rating the electrode location. The correlation between rating methods was strong (kappa > 0.890). The software gives a fast and reliable method of evaluating electrode scalar location for cone beam CT scans. The introduced electrode location grading scale was adapted for assessing clinical CT images.

Cochlear Implantation: Systematic Approach to Preoperative Radiologic Evaluation

Sensorineural hearing loss results from abnormalities that affect the hair cells of the membranous labyrinth, inner ear malformations, and conditions affecting the auditory pathway from the cochlear nerve to the processing centers of the brain. Cochlear implantation is increasingly being performed for hearing rehabilitation owing to expanding indications and a growing number of children and adults with sensorineural hearing loss. An adequate understanding of the temporal bone anatomy and diseases that affect the inner ear is paramount for alerting the operating surgeon about variants and imaging findings that can influence the surgical technique, affect the choice of cochlear implant and electrode type, and help avoid inadvertent complications. In this article, imaging protocols for sensorineural hearing loss and the normal inner ear anatomy are reviewed, with a brief description of cochlear implant devices and surgical techniques. In addition, congenital inner ear malformations and acquired causes of sensorineural hearing loss are discussed, with a focus on imaging findings that may affect surgical planning and outcomes. The anatomic factors and variations that are associated with surgical challenges and may predispose patients to periprocedural complications also are highlighted. ^© RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.

Detection of Tip Fold-Over of the Slim Modiolar Electrode Using Intraoperative Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the importance of mobile cone-beam computed tomography in detecting tip fold-over of a slim modiolar electrode within the cochlea during surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

METHODS

From January 2020 to June 2022, 33 ears of 30 patients with normal cochlear morphology underwent cochlear implantation with slim modiolar electrodes and intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Furthermore, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records and images.

RESULTS

The tip fold-over of the electrodes was detected using mobile cone-beam computed tomography in 3 out of 33 ears (9.1%). We could not identify the tip fold-over by scouting plain X-ray images in 2 out of 3 cases before taking the cone-beam computed tomography images. Electrode removal and reinsertion were performed before wound closure and the successful reinsertion was confirmed by mobile cone-beam computed tomography. The folded electrode tips were located at 238.8°, 152°, and 185.8°.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative mobile cone-beam computed tomography is useful in detecting the tip fold-over of the slim modiolar electrodes during surgery. Therefore, it was possible to reinsert the electrodes in all cases before closing the wound, eliminating the need for revision surgeries. Moreover, the analysis of mobile cone-beam computed tomography images may help to elucidate the mechanisms of electrode tip fold-over.

Insight in to the Awareness of CBCT as an Imaging Modality in the Diagnosis and Management of ENT Disorders: A Cross Sectional Study

The advent of Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), has revolutionized 3D imaging in dentistry. CBCT has enormous potential to be used as an alternative imaging modality by Otolaryngologists. But their knowledge regarding CBCT is limited. The study aims to evaluate the awareness of CBCT as an imaging modality among Ear, nose and Throat (ENT) practitioners. The validated questionnaire was sent by email and the participants were asked to fill the google form through the link provided to record the responses. The participants were asked to answer 25 multiple choice questions regarding the general information and practice related to CBCT imaging. Data was evaluated according to the descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test was used to determine the test of significance. The response rate for this study was 84.4%. The mean age of the participants was 44.9 ± 11.3. 69% of the respondents were academicians,14.2% had exclusive clinical practice, and 16.8% had both clinical and academic exposure. Among the study population, 76.8% had never advised CBCT in their practice. Only 10.3% of the study participants were aware of the potential of CBCT in ENT disorders. The mean knowledge, attitude and practice scores were very low regarding the applications of CBCT. Most of the study participants advised CBCT for maxillofacial fractures (78.1%) and was statistically significant p < 0.05. The knowledge about various advantages and clinical applications of CBCT among Otolaryngologists is limited. However, continuing medical education and inclusion in the medical curriculum will increase the scope and awareness about CBCT among ENT fraternity.

Visualization of Different Types of Cochlear Implants in Postoperative Cone-Beam CT Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate cone-beam computed-tomography (CBCT) images of the temporal bone for radiological delineation, metal artifacts, and accuracy for localization of six different electrode arrays after cochlear device implantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 116 patients who underwent CBCT (120kV, 7.1mA) within 24 hours after cochlear device implantation. Exclusion criteria were anatomical abnormalities, and electrode misinsertion. Six different CI electrodes were implanted: Advanced Bionics HiFocus Mid-Scala, Cochlear Contour Advance, Cochlear Slim-Straight, Cochlear Slim-Modiolar, MED-EL Flex 24 and MED-EL Flex 28. Two radiologists rated independently presence of metal artifacts, overall image quality, as well as dedicated visualization of the osseous spiral lamina, inner and outer cochlear wall, single electrode contacts, and electrode position using 5-point-Likert scales. Inter-rater agreement was calculated by using Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation.

RESULTS

Of 116 patients, 94 (81.0%; 56.1 ± 16.9 years; age range, 13-86 years; 49 [52.1%] females) were included in the study. Overall image quality was rated good for all electrode models without significant differences (p = 0.061). Depiction of electrode contacts was rated significantly better for Advanced Bionics HiFocus Mid-Scala, Cochlear Slim-Straight, and MED-EL Flex 24 and 28 compared to Cochlear Contour Advance and Slim-Modiolar (p < 0.001). Depiction of the osseous spiral lamina (p = 0.20), inner (p = 0.42) and outer cochlear wall (p = 0.35), metal artifacts (p = 0.18), and electrode position (p = 0.31) did not show significant differences between electrode models. Inter-rater agreement varied from substantial to almost perfect (0.70-0.93).

CONCLUSION

CBCT provides excellent visualization of all evaluated CI electrode types, in particular electrode arrays with greater spacing between contacts and contact size allow improved radiologic evaluation.

Evaluating cochlear insertion trauma and hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CIPRES): a study protocol for a randomized single-blind controlled trial

Background

In order to preserve residual hearing in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive a cochlear implant (CI), insertion trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlea needs to be minimized. The surgical approach comprises the conventional mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy (MPT) to arrive at the middle ear, followed by either a cochleostomy (CO) or the round window (RW) approach. Both techniques have their benefits and disadvantages. Another important aspect in structure preservation is the design of the electrode array. Two different designs are used: a “straight” lateral wall lying electrode array (LW) or a “pre-curved” perimodiolar lying electrode array (PM). Interestingly, until now, the best surgical approach and design of the implant is uncertain. Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in hearing preservation outcomes between the four possible treatment options.

Methods

We designed a monocenter, multi-arm, randomized controlled trial to compare insertion trauma between four groups of patients, with each group having a unique combination of an electrode array type (LW or PM) and surgical approach (RW or CO). In total, 48 patients will be randomized into one of these four intervention groups. Our primary objective is the comparison of postoperative hearing preservation between these four groups. Secondly, we aim to assess structure preservation (i.e., scalar translocation, with basilar membrane disruption or tip fold-over of array) for each group. Thirdly, we will compare objective outcomes of hearing and structure preservation by way of electrocochleography (ECochG).

Discussion

Cochlear implantation by way of a cochleostomy or round window approach, using different electrode array types, is the standard medical care for patients with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, as it is a relatively simple and low-risk procedure that greatly benefits patients. However, loss of residual hearing remains a problem. This trial is the first randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of cochlear insertion trauma of several CI treatment options on hearing preservation.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL8586. Registered on 4 May 2020. Retrospectively registered; 3/48 participants were included before registration.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05878-2.

Flat-panel conebeam CT in the clinic: history and current state

Research into conebeam CT concepts began as soon as the first clinical single-slice CT scanner was conceived. Early implementations of conebeam CT in the 1980s focused on high-contrast applications where concurrent high resolution ( < 200    μ m ), for visualization of small contrast-filled vessels, bones, or teeth, was an imaging requirement that could not be met by the contemporaneous CT scanners. However, the use of nonlinear imagers, e.g., x-ray image intensifiers, limited the clinical utility of the earliest diagnostic conebeam CT systems. The development of consumer-electronics large-area displays provided a technical foundation that was leveraged in the 1990s to first produce large-area digital x-ray detectors for use in radiography and then compact flat panels suitable for high-resolution and high-frame-rate conebeam CT. In this review, we show the concurrent evolution of digital flat panel (DFP) technology and clinical conebeam CT. We give a brief summary of conebeam CT reconstruction, followed by a brief review of the correction approaches for DFP-specific artifacts. The historical development and current status of flat-panel conebeam CT in four clinical areas-breast, fixed C-arm, image-guided radiation therapy, and extremity/head-is presented. Advances in DFP technology over the past two decades have led to improved visualization of high-contrast, high-resolution clinical tasks, and image quality now approaches the soft-tissue contrast resolution that is the standard in clinical CT. Future technical developments in DFPs will enable an even broader range of clinical applications; research in the arena of flat-panel CT shows no signs of slowing down.

Precise evaluation of the postoperative cochlear duct length by flat-panel volume computed tomography - Application of secondary reconstructions

OBJECTIVE

There is still a lack in precise postoperative evaluation of the cochlea because of strong artifacts. This study aimed to improve accuracy of postoperative two-turn (2TL) and cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements by applying flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT), secondary reconstruction (fpVCT_SECO) and three-dimensional curved multiplanar reconstruction.

METHODS

First, 10 temporal bone specimens with or without electrode were measured in multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), fpVCT and fpVCT_SECO and compared to high-resolution micro-CT scans. Later, pre- and postoperative scans of 10 patients were analyzed in a clinical setting.

RESULTS

Concerning 2TL, no statistically significant difference was observed between implanted fpVCT_SECO and nonimplanted micro-CT in 10 temporal bone specimens. In contrast, there was a significant discrepancy for CDL (difference: -0.7 mm, P = 0.004). Nevertheless, there were no clinically unacceptable errors (±1.5 mm). These results could be confirmed in a clinical setting. Using fpVCT_SECO, CDL was slightly underestimated postoperatively (difference: -0.5 mm, P = 0.002) but without any clinically unacceptable errors.

CONCLUSION

fpVCT_SECO can be successfully applied for a precise measurement of the cochlear lengths pre- and postoperatively. However, users must be aware of a slight systematic underestimation of CDL postoperatively. These results may help to refine electrode selection and frequency mapping.

Precise Evaluation of the Cochlear Duct Length by Flat-panel Volume Computed Tomography (fpVCT)-Implication of Secondary Reconstructions

HYPOTHESIS

Flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT) and secondary reconstruction allow for more accurate measurements of two-turn length (2TL), cochlear duct length (CDL), and angular length (AL).

BACKGROUND

Cochlear geometry is a controversially debated topic. In the meantime, there are many different studies partly reporting highly divergent values. Our aim is to discuss the differences and to propose a radiological possibility to improve cochlear measurements using 3D-curved multiplanar reconstruction and fpVCT.

METHODS

Performing different image modalities and settings, we tried to find a clinically usable option that allows for a high degree of accuracy. Therefore, we tested them against reference values of high-definition micro-computed tomography.

RESULTS

Comparison of 99 μm slice thickness secondary reconstruction of fpVCT and reference showed no significant differences for 2TL and CDL (p ≥ 0.05). Accordingly, ICC (intraclass correlation) values were excellent (ICC ≥ 0.75; lower limit of confidence interval [CI] ≥ 0.75; Cronbach's alpha [α] ≥ 0.9). Evaluating AL, there was a significant difference (difference: -17.27°; p = 0.002). The lower limit of the CI of the ICC was unacceptable (ICC = 0.944; lower limit of CI = 0.248; α = 0.990). Regarding the Bland-Altman plots, there were no clinically unacceptable errors, but a systematic underestimation of AL.

CONCLUSION

Secondary reconstruction is a suitable tool for producing reliable data that allow the accurate measurement of 2TL and CDL. The option of generating these reconstructions from raw data limits the need for higher radiation doses. Nevertheless, there is an underestimation of AL using secondary reconstructions.

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A User-Friendly, Practical Roadmap to the Planning and Execution of Every Rhinoplasty-A 5-Year Review

BACKGROUND

Cone-beam computed tomography has recently rapidly developed worldwide as a versatile and convenient alternative to traditional computed tomography for imaging of the maxillofacial region. However, most surgeons performing rhinoplasty are surprisingly unfamiliar with it, in both the plastic surgery and ear, nose, and throat communities.

METHODS

The broad clinical experience of a single center over the past 5 years is reviewed. The many applications of cone-beam computed tomography to primary and secondary rhinoplasty are analyzed regarding septum, turbinates, nasal bones, skin thickness, and other issues. The importance of a paradigm shift from a two-dimensional to a three-dimensional approach in image reconstruction is demonstrated, together with the value of surface contour enhancement.

RESULTS

Cone-beam computed tomography has a multitude of practical applications highly relevant to rhinoplasty. The surface image will strengthen aesthetic analysis, and the detailed preview of bony and functional anatomy will facilitate surgical planning. Cone-beam computed tomography serves as a roadmap to plan and execute rhinoplasties more predictably and efficiently. The availability of spatial views and accurate detail, together with the possibility of easy, accurate measuring, offers a plenitude of potential applications.

CONCLUSIONS

Cone-beam computed tomography is a user-friendly, quick technique with abundant advantages in planning any rhinoplasty. It causes the patient no inconvenience and has very few, if any, drawbacks, with these being limited to radiation exposure and limited cost.

Synchrotron radiation X-ray microtomography for the visualization of intra-cochlear anatomy in human temporal bones implanted with a perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode array

Recently, synchrotron radiation computed microtomography (SRµCT) has emerged as a promising tool for non-destructive, in situ visualization of cochlear implant electrode arrays inserted into a human cochlea. Histological techniques have been the `gold standard' technique for accurate localization of cochlear implant electrodes but are suboptimal for precise three-dimensional measurements. Here, an SRµCT experimental setup is proposed that offers the benefit of a high spatial and contrast resolution (isotropic voxel size = 4.95 µm and propagation-based phase-contrast imaging), while visualizing the soft-tissue structures and electrode array of the cochlear implant simultaneously. In this work, perimodiolar electrode arrays have been tested, which incorporate thick and closely spaced platinum-iridium contacts and wiring. These data can assist cochlear implant and hearing research, can be used to verify electrode segmentation techniques for clinical computed tomography or could be utilized to evaluate cochlear implant electrode array designs.

Assessment of Frequency-Place Mismatch by Flat-Panel CT and Correlation With Cochlear Implant Performance

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the frequency allocation mismatch in a group of very selected cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to contrast it with the speech perception performances.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational prospective study.

SETTINGS

Tertiary Audiological Department, University hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifteen adults receiving the same CI array by the same surgeon through a posterior tympanotomy, round window approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

1) High definition flat panel computed tomography (FPCT) control of the intracochlear position of each electrode contact, and computation of the relative frequency allocation mismatch; 2) analysis of speech perception outcomes in relation with the mismatch.

RESULTS

Despite a consistent and reproducible surgical procedure with the same intracochlear array, significant deviations from the frequency allocation tables (FAT) assigned by default by the manufacturer were observed in this study.Their influences on speech perception performances were negligible in the simple tasks of words or sentences recognition in quiet (and, to a lesser extent also in noise). The greatest effect of a significant mismatch was observed for the vocal-consonant-vocal (VCV) sequences recognition under noise masking, the emotional and the linguistic prosody recognition, and the phonemes discrimination of the Auditory Speech Sound Evaluation (A§E) test.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest frequency-to-place occurred at the high frequencies. The effect was rather irrelevant on simple words and sentences recognition, while it negatively impacted on the more complex perceptual tasks.

Cone-beam CT versus Multidetector CT in Postoperative Cochlear Implant Imaging: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cone-beam CT is being increasingly used in head and neck imaging. We compared cone-beam CT with multidetector CT to assess postoperative implant placement and delineate finer anatomic structures, image quality, and radiation dose used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included 51 patients with cochlear implants and postoperative imaging via temporal bone cone-beam CT (n = 32 ears) or multidetector CT (n = 19 ears) between 2012 and 2017. We evaluated the visualization quality of single electrode contacts, the scalar position of the electrodes, cochlear walls, mastoid facial canal, metallic artifacts (using a 4-level visual score), and the ability to measure the insertion angle of the electrodes. The signal-to-noise ratio and radiation dose were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Cone-beam CT was more sensitive for visualizing the scalar position of the electrodes (P = .046), cochlear outer wall (P = .001), single electrode contacts (P < .001), and osseous spiral lamina (P = .004) and had fewer metallic artifacts (P < .001). However, there were no significant differences between both methods in visualization of the modiolus (P = .37), cochlear inner wall (P > .99), and mastoid facial canal wall (P = .07) and the ability to measure the insertion angle of the electrodes (P > .99). The conebeam CT group had significantly lower dose-length product (P < .001), but multidetector CT showed a higher signal-to-noise ratio in both bone and air (P = .22 and P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cone-beam CT in patients with cochlear implants provides images with higher spatial resolution and fewer metallic artifacts than multidetector CT at a relatively lower radiation dose.

Assessment of Angular Insertion-Depth of Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Plain X-ray Scans

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in cochlear implant patients, the feasibility and reliability of angular depth of insertion (aDOI) measurements using plain x-ray scans.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study where three observers independently evaluated and compared intraoperative anterior-posterior and oblique x-ray scans.

SETTING

A tertiary pediatric medical center.

PATIENTS

Included were 50 children (100 ears) who underwent bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation during 2008 to 2015.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Inter-rater agreement of aDOI measured in plain x-ray scans; effect of head position on measured aDOI; and symmetry of aDOI between patients' ears in bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantations.

RESULTS

Differences in the average aDOI measurements among the three observers ranged between 2 and 7 degrees. There was high inter-rater agreement (R = 0.99, p < 0.01) among all observers, and strong correlations between each pair of observers (0.92-0.99). Head rotation of 45 degrees (between the two views) resulted in a median difference in aDOI of 14 degrees, with excellent correlation among the observers. The rate of asymmetry was high, with a median difference of 39 degrees and up to 220 degrees between ears.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of aDOI using intraoperative plain x-rays is efficient and reliable. The effect of head positioning on measurement is small. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of aDOI and insertion symmetry on functional outcomes.

Posterior semi-circular canal electrode misplacement in Goldenhar's syndrome

Literature documents the incidence of electrode misplacement within the range of 0.2% to 5.8% with the superior SCC as the most common site, followed by the vestibule. In this report, we present the finding of electrode misplacement in the posterior SCC in a child with Goldenhar syndrome which was subsequently corrected. This child with bilateral congenital profound SNHL presented for unilateral cochlear implant surgery. Intraoperatively, the lateral SCC bulge, stapes, oval window, round window niche and pyramid were noted absent, leading to a surgical decision in favour of a subtotal petrosectomy. Using the aberrant facial nerve and jugular bulb as critical landmarks, a cochleostomy was performed in the posteroinferior aspect of the promontory bulge. Although electrode insertion was smooth and complete, NRT was absent in the presence of normal electrode impedance. A post-operative HRCT scan showed the electrodes in the posterior SCC. Repositioning of the electrodes was carried out by creating a new cochleostomy anteroinferior to the previous one. Complete correct electrode insertion was accomplished via this cochleostomy complimented by robust NRT tracings. Cochlear implant electrode insertion should be supported by correct identification of surgical landmarks. Intraoperative impedance testing and NRT help confirm device integrity and correct placement, the absence of which may raise the suspicion of malposition. In the presence of such a suspicion, the post-operative HRCT scan is a useful retrospective guide to corrective action, in a low-cost setting lacking intra-operative imaging facilities like X-ray, Fluoroscopy, Flat Panel CT & CBCT. Abbreviations, BERA: Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry; CBCT: Cone Beam Computed Tomography; EAC: External Auditory Canal; ITD: Insertion Test Device; LSCS: Lower Segment Caesarean Section; MDT: Multi-Disciplinary Team; NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; NRT: Neural Response Telemetry; OAE: Oto-Acoustic Emissions; PIH: Pregnancy Induced Hypertension; SCC: Semi-Circular Canal; SNHL: Sensori-Neural Hearing Loss.

A narrative review of the logistic and economic feasibility of cochlear implants in lower-income countries

Objectives: Globally, less than 1% of people who could benefit from a cochlear implant have one and the problem is particularly acute in lower-income countries. Here we give a narrative review of the economic and logistic feasibility of cochlear implant programmes in lower-income countries and discuss future developments that would enable better healthcare. We review the incidence and aetiology of hearing loss in low- and middle-income countries, screening for hearing loss, implantation criteria, issues concerning imaging and surgery, and the professional expertise required. We also review the cost of cochlear implantation and ongoing costs. Findings: The cost effectiveness of cochlear implants in lower-income countries is more limited by the cost of the device than the cost of surgery, but there are also large ongoing costs that will deter many potential users. Conclusions: We conclude that the main barriers to the future uptake of cochlear implants are likely to be logistical rather than technical and cochlear implant provision should be considered as part of a wider programme to improve the health of those with hearing loss.

Fluoroscopy guided electrode-array insertion for cochlear implantation with straight electrode-arrays: a valuable tool in most cases

PURPOSE

To highlight the advantages of real time fluoroscopy guided electrode-array (EA) insertion (FGI) during cochlear implants surgery.

METHODS

All surgical procedures were performed in a dedicated operating room equipped with a robotic C-arm cone beam device, allowing for intraoperative real time 2D FGI and postoperative 3D imaging. Only straight EAs were used. Patients were sorted out in three groups: ANAT, with anatomical concerns; HP, with residual hearing; NPR: patients with no particular reason for FGI. In all cases the angle of EA-insertion was measured. In the HP group pre and postoperative hearing were compared. The radiation delivered to the patient was recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-three cochlear implantation procedures were achieved under fluoroscopy in 50 patients from November 2015 to January 2020 (HP group: n = 10; ANAT group: n = 13; NPR group: n = 27). In the ANAT group, FGI proved to be helpful in 8 cases (61.5%), successfully guiding the surgeon during EA -insertion. On average, the angle of insertion was at 424° ± 55°. In the HP group, a controlled smooth EA-insertion was carried out in all cases but one. The targeted 360° angle of insertion was always reached. Hearing preservation was possible with an eventual average drop of 30 ± 1.5 dB. In the NPR group, FGI helped control the quality of insertion in all cases and appeared very informative in five (17.8%): one EA-misrouting, three stuck EAs, and one case with hidden electrodes out of the cochlea in revision surgery. Final 3D cone beam CT scan double-checked the EA position in all adults. The radiation dose was equivalent to a bit less than four digital subtract radiographs.

CONCLUSION

The FGI is a very useful adjunct in cochlear implantation in all cases of expected surgical pitfalls, in patients with residual hearing, and even in case without preoperative particular reason, with low irradiation.

First Experience With a New Thin Lateral Wall Electrode in Human Temporal Bones

INTRODUCTION

A modern cochlear implant electrode array design must combine: improved surgical ease of use, structure preservation, particularly important for pediatric application, stable position within the cochlea over time, and a meaningful balance between hearing preservation against addressing sufficient cochlear tissue to support electrical-only hearing. The aim of this study was to investigate a new lateral wall electrode array design from Advanced Bionics on human temporal bones (TBs).

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen TBs were implanted with the SlimJ electrode array via the round window. The electrode array is 23 mm long, with a cross-section varying from 0.25 × 0.55 mm at the most apical contact to 0.6 × 0.8 mm at the proximal marker contact. To assess location of the electrode array, the TBs were postoperatively scanned using cone beam computed tomography, and histology was performed to assess intracochlear trauma (Grades 0-4).

RESULTS

All electrode arrays were considered easy to insert. The average insertion depth was 432 degrees measured from the round window with a range from 411 to 450 degrees azimuth. Nine out of 10 electrode arrays were inserted fully (<0.5 mm out of the cochlea), one electrode array was left 1.5 mm out of the cochlea. No translocations were observed in all 10 cochleae, slight touching of the basilar membrane at the distal portion of the array was observed in 50% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The results from the new thin lateral wall electrode array from Advanced Bionics provided consistent scala tympani locations. No translocations were observed and almost all electrode arrays were fully inserted. These results are promising and the new electrode array will be further studied in clinical practice investigating hearing preservation capabilities and speech performance.

Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users

Importance

Cochlear implant users generally display poor pitch perception. Flat-panel computed tomography (FPCT) has recently emerged as a modality capable of localizing individual electrode contacts within the cochlea in vivo. Significant place-pitch mismatch between the clinical implant processing settings given to patients and the theoretical maps based on FPCT imaging has previously been noted.

Objective

To assess whether place-pitch mismatch is associated with poor cochlear implant-mediated pitch perception through evaluation of an individualized, image-guided approach toward cochlear implant programming on speech and music perception among cochlear implant users.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A prospective cohort study of 17 cochlear implant users with MED-EL electrode arrays was performed at a tertiary referral center. The study was conducted from June 2016 to July 2017.

Interventions

Theoretical place-pitch maps using FPCT secondary reconstructions and 3-dimensional curved planar re-formation software were developed. The clinical map settings (eg, strategy, rate, volume, frequency band range) were modified to keep factors constant between the 2 maps and minimize confounding. The acclimation period to the maps was 30 minutes.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Participants performed speech perception tasks (eg, consonant-nucleus-consonant, Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise, vowel identification) and a pitch-scaling task while using the image-guided place-pitch map (intervention) and the modified clinical map (control). Performance scores between the 2 interventions were measured.

Results

Of the 17 participants, 10 (58.8%) were women; mean (SD) was 59 (11.3) years. A significant median increase in pitch scaling accuracy was noted when using the experimental map compared with the control map (4 more correct answers; 95% CI, 0-8). Specifically, the number of pitch-scaling reversals for notes spaced at 1.65 semitones or greater decreased when an image-based approach to cochlear implant programming was used vs the modified clinical map (4 mistakes; 95% CI, 0.5-7). Although there was no observable median improvement in speech perception during use of an image-based map, the acute changes in frequency allocation and electrode channel deactivations used with the image-guided maps did not worsen consonant-nucleus-consonant (-1% correct phonemes, 95% CI, -2.5% to 6%) and Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise (0.5-dB difference; 95% CI, -0.75 to 2.25 dB) median performance results relative to the clinical maps used by the patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

An image-based approach toward ochlear implant mapping may improve pitch perception outcomes by reducing place-pitch mismatch. Studies using a longer acclimation period with chronic stimulation over months may help assess the full range of the benefits associated with personalized image-guided cochlear implant mapping.

Potential insertion complications with cochlear implant electrodes

Objectives: The aim of this discussion paper and literature review was to estimate the incidence of a variety of complications associated with the surgical placement of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and to discuss the implications and management of sub-optimal electrode placement. Results: A review of the peer-reviewed literature suggests that the incidence of incomplete electrode insertion and kinking is more prevalent in straight arrays and not more than about 2% in CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy/patency. Incidence of tip fold-over is greater with perimodiolar arrays but also occurs with straight arrays and is typically less than 5%. Conversely, electrode migration is more common with straight arrays, and high rates (up to 46%) have been reported in some studies. Scalar translocations have also been reported for both perimodiolar and straight arrays. Higher rates have been reported for stylet-based perimodiolar electrodes inserted via cochleostomy (up to 56%), but with much lower rates (<10%) with both sheath-based perimodiolar arrays and lateral wall arrays. Electrode positioning complications represent a significant proportion of perioperative CI complications and compromise the level of benefit from the device. Careful surgical planning and appropriate pre- and intraoperative imaging can reduce the likelihood and impact of electrode positioning complications. There is also evidence that newer array designs are less prone to certain complications, particularly scalar translocation. Conclusions: It is important that implanting surgeons are aware of the impact of sub-optimal electrode placement and the steps that can be taken to avoid, identify and manage such complications.

A New Application of CBCT Image Fusion in Temporal Bone Studies

OBJECTIVES

Temporal bone (TB) studies are essential during the development of new arrays. Postoperative cochlear histology is still regarded as golden standard for the assessment of electrode localization and trauma though it is time consuming, expensive and technically very demanding. The aim of this study is to investigate whether pre-operative evacuation of perilymph improve the assessment of electrode localization and insertion trauma in TBs applying fusion imaging. The results were compared to a prior validated image fusion technique based on the quantification of the electrode placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

12 prototype electrodes were implanted in fresh frozen TBs. The perilymph was evacuated from the scale prior to pre-operative cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT). The TB were then immersed in Ringer solution to rehydrated both scalae. After electrode insertion post-operative CBCT were obtained. 3D fusions of the pre- and postoperative registration were reconstructed. The electrode localization with respect to the basilar membrane was visually assessed.

RESULTS

The visualization of the BM on the pre-operative scans was achieved beyond the second turn in all TBs. The visual assessment was found to be as accurate as the previously validated fusion technique. There was no statistically significant difference between the methods (p=0.564). The image reconstructions and evaluations, however, were faster to perform and the insertion results are immediately available.

CONCLUSION

CBCT in combination with pre- and postoperative image fusion is an accurate method for the post-operative assessment of insertion trauma in TBs. This new application facilitates the identification of the BM and allows for a visual assessment of insertion trauma.

The Image Fusion Technique for Cochlear Implant Imaging: A Study of its Application for Different Electrode Arrays

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the benefits of the image fusion technique for precise postoperative assessment of intracochlear placement with six different electrode arrays.

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive retrospective case study.

SETTINGS

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Analyses of imaging data of 30 patients implanted with six different electrode arrays.

INTERVENTIONS

Electrode reconstructions obtained from postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were overlaid onto preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) registrations to create artefact-free images.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Each electrode's intracochlear position was analyzed with the image fusion reconstructions and compared with the results obtained by CBCT alone. The electrode location was classified according to its position in relation to the basal membrane at four different insertion angles.

RESULTS

In 40 out of 151 measurements (26.5%), the location grading obtained by CBCT alone changed after the assessment with the image fusion reconstructions. A significant association was found between deep insertions (over 360 degrees) and the effectiveness of image fusion (p = 0.019). The difference between the impact of the fusion technique for the basal turn versus the apical part was highly significant (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between the effectiveness of the image fusion and the different electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

By utilizing an image fusion technique, a more accurate assessment of electrode placement could be achieved for all types of electrodes. Image fusion was especially beneficial for insertions beyond 360 degrees.

Image quality of flat-panel computed tomography using 2 different acquisition times versus multidetector computed tomography in whole-head temporal bone specimen

PURPOSE

Imaging of temporal bone and skull base acquire high resolution due to the small anatomic structures with high clinical relevance. The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of the temporal bone in standard 20 s protocol flat-panel computed tomography (FPCT) with the new time- and dose improved 10 s protocol as well as with 128 slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The aim was to evaluate the new time- and dose improved 10 s protocol.

METHODS

10 whole-skull preparations-20 temporal bones-were scanned with either 128 slice MDCT CT (SOMATOM Definition AS + , Siemens, Erlangen) or FPCT (AXIOM-Artis, Siemens, Erlangen) using 10 s or 20 s protocol.

RESULTS

We show here that overall FPCT provides significantly better image quality and improved delimitation of clinically relevant structures in the temporal bone compared to 128 slice MDCT. Especially the shorter, dose saving 10 s protocol of the FPCT is still superior to 128 slice MDCT. The 20 s FPCT protocol was only significantly superior in identification of the cochlear apical turn and can thereby be used specifically in clinical cases with pathologies in this area.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10 s FPCT protocol yields a significantly better image quality than MDCT in imaging finer structures of the temporal bone.

Cone beam CT for perioperative imaging in hearing preservation Cochlear implantation - a human cadaveric study

Background

Knowledge of the cochlear implant array’s precise position is important because of the correlation between electrode position and speech understanding. Several groups have provided recent image processing evidence to determine scalar translocation, angular insertion depth, and cochlear duct length (CDL); all of which are being used for patient-specific programming. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is increasingly used in otology due to its superior resolution and low radiation dose. Our objectives are as followed:

Validate CBCT by measuring cochlear metrics, including basal turn diameter (A-value) and lateral wall cochlear duct length at different angular intervals and comparing it against microcomputed CT (uCT).

Explore the relationship between measured lateral wall cochlear duct length at different angular intervals and insertion depth among 3 different length electrodes using CBCT.

Methods

The study was performed using fixed human cadaveric temporal bones in a tertiary academic centre. Ten temporal bones were subjected to the standard facial recess approach for cochlear implantation and imaged by CBCT followed by uCT. Measurements were performed on a three-dimensional reconstructed model of the cochlea. Sequential insertion of 3 electrodes (Med-El Flex24, 28 and Soft) was then performed in 5 bones and reimaged by CBCT. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson’s correlation.

Results

There was good agreement between CBCT and uCT for cochlear metrics, validating the precision of CBCT against the current gold standard uCT in imaging. The A-value recorded by both modalities showed a high degree of linear correlation and did not differ by more than 0.23 mm in absolute values. For the measurement of lateral wall CDL at various points along the cochlea, there was a good correlation between both modalities at 360 deg and 720 deg (r = 0.85, p < 0.01 and r = 0.79, p < 0.01). The Flex24 electrode displayed consistent insertion depth across different bones.

Conclusions

CBCT reliably performs cochlear metrics and measures electrode insertion depth. The low radiation dose, fast acquisition time, diminished metallic artifacts and portability of CBCT make it a valid option for imaging in cochlear implant surgery.

Cochlear Implantation With a Novel Long Straight Electrode: the Insertion Results Evaluated by Imaging and Histology in Human Temporal Bones

HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the insertion results of a novel straight array (EVO) by detailed imaging and subsequent histology in human temporal bones (TB).

BACKGROUND

The main focuses of modern cochlear implant surgery are to prevent damage to the intracochlear structures and to preserve residual hearing. This is often achievable with new atraumatic electrode arrays in combination with meticulous surgical techniques.

METHODS

Twenty fresh-frozen TBs were implanted with the EVO. Pre- and postoperative cone beam computed tomography scans were reconstructed and fused for an artifact-free representation of the electrode. The array's vertical position was quantified in relation to the basilar membrane on basis of which trauma was classified (Grades 0-4). The basilar membrane location was modeled from previous histologic data. The TBs underwent subsequent histologic examination.

RESULTS

The EVOs were successfully inserted in all TBs. Atraumatic insertion (Grades 0-1) were accomplished in 14 of 20 TBs (70%). There were three apical translocations, and two basal translocations due to electrode bulging. One TB had multiple translocations. The sensitivity and specificity of imaging for detecting insertion trauma (Grades 2-4) was 87.5% and 97.3.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Comparable insertion results as reported for other arrays were also found for the EVO. Insertion trauma can be mostly avoided with meticulous insertion techniques to prevent bulging and by limiting the insertion depth angle to 360 degrees. The image fusion technique is a reliable tool for evaluating electrode placement and is feasible for trauma grading.

Evaluation of Intracochlear Position of a Slim Modiolar Electrode Array, by Using Different Radiological Analyses

INTRODUCTION

The radiological analysis following a cochlear implantation offers insight into the audiological outcomes of cochlear implant recipients. The wrapping factor (WF) is the most common radiological analysis measuring the modiolar position and depth of insertion of an electrode array. New measurements like the intracochlear position index (ICPI) or the homogeneity factor (HF) can offer more accurate information regarding the electrode's intracochlear position. We have also studied a new method to calculate the WF, by normalizing it with a new methodology (WFn).

OBJECTIVES

To analyze and compare the results of the WF, ICPI, HF, and WFn obtained using a cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) with the histological analysis on temporal bone.

MATERIAL

A perimodiolar electrode array (Nucleus Slim CI532) was inserted in three temporal bones. A perfect insertion was performed in the first temporal bone, according to the correct specifications. In the second specimen, a slightly over-inserted electrode was analyzed and in the third specimen a completely over-inserted electrode array was studied.

METHOD

A CBCT was performed following the implantations and then, a histological analysis with slices perpendicular to the cochlea axis (modiolus). Each measurement was made 10 times by 10 experts (radiologist and otologist) with a total amount of 600 measurements (100 for each data, 3 CBCT and 3 histology). A t test statistical analysis was performed to compare the measurements between CBCT and histology.

RESULTS

It was observed that the ICPI and the HF correctly identify the three different insertions. Regarding the WF no significant difference in the two over-inserted specimens was found. The ICPI was the only measurement that shows no statistical difference between the CBCT and the histology, so it was considered the most accurate method. Finally, the WF shows a statistical difference between the CBCT and the histology in all cases, indicating the poor value of the radiological method. The WFn analysis includes the modiolar wall length in the measurement. This improves the final result as it reduces the error induced by the size of the cochlea.

CONCLUSION

The ICPI and the HF provide better radiological information than the WF, regarding the intracochlear position of the electrode array. The most relevant difference is that the ICPI, HF, and WFn include modiolar and lateral wall dimensions, thereby using the diameter of the cochlear duct for the analysis.

Radiological evaluation of inner ear trauma after cochlear implant surgery by cone beam CT(CBCT)

PURPOSE

Cochlear implantation (CI) has been extended to involve younger age group with higher incidence of residual hearing which increases the need of minimizing surgical inner ear trauma. Radiological evaluation for electrode position has been studied yet without assessment of inner ear trauma, our objective is radiological evaluation of post cochlear implantation inner ear trauma MATERIAL AND METHODS: 20 patients with CI for pre lingual SNHL were included in this study. Cone beam CT (CBCT) was used for evaluation of electrode position and assessment of inner ear trauma. A Neuroradiologist and an implant surgeon analyzed the relation of inserted electrode to the intra-cochlear structures, with introduction of novel radiological grading for inner ear trauma.

RESULTS

The mean major cochlear diameter was 8.9 mm, the mean angular depth of insertion was 406.9944 (SD = 165.0559). Ten patients were with no cochlear trauma (grade 0), three patients were grade 1, two patients were grade 2 and five patients were grade 3 inner ear trauma.

CONCLUSION

Radiological evaluation for electrode position should extend to involve assessment of inner ear trauma using relation of the implant to cochlear internal structures which could be performed by CBCT with high resolution and least metallic artifacts.

Radiologic recognition of cochlear implant magnet displacement

Despite various studies that have demonstrated risk of cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI, minimal literature is available on radiologic recognition of magnet displacement. Current literature emphasizes the status and placement of the electrode component of the implant. This case report examines the consequences of a delay in radiologic diagnosis of a displaced magnet including hospital admission, unnecessary radiation, and prolonged patient discomfort. Additionally, it provides a framework for successful radiologic recognition of a displaced magnet, detailing specific imaging modalities and magnet characteristics that should be evaluated to expedite and facilitate radiologic recognition of displacement.

Initial surgical and clinical experience with the Nucleus CI532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this work is to describe the first experience in the UK with the slim pre-curved perimodiolar electrode Nucleus CI532 in a continuous series of patients in terms of surgical and clinical reliability and early performance outcomes.

METHOD

In this retrospective review we describe the complication rate (including electrode array tip fold-over), NRT thresholds, hearing preservation, power efficiency and CI performance outcomes in a continuous series of 40 cochlear implants CI532 performed between October 2016 and November 2017 in 17 adults and 13 children with severe to profound hearing loss.

RESULTS

Preliminary data from these groups reveals some low-frequency hearing preservation in the CI532 group although none of the patients were conventional hearing preservation candidates. NRT thresholds, power efficiency, and BKB sentences in quiet were measured at 3 and 6 months post activation. There were no significant differences in these results. The average BKB score in quiet increases from 22% pre-operatively to 58% at 3 months and 70% at 6 months. In addition, although hearing preservation was not an objective, low-frequency thresholds were preserved in 20% of cases at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Complications were observed in 5 cases, one case with non-device related aerocoele and four related to the device array: two cases of tip roll over, one case of the electrode array being placed extra-cochlea, and one case with the electrode buckling into the middle ear. The last 2 cases were dealt with per-operatively.

DISCUSSION

Our preliminary results with the CI532 implant indicate that it may be reliably placed with standard surgical techniques but care is needed during the deployment of the electrode. Further initial data suggest that switch on and early electrophysiological measures are comparable to the existing CI 512 device. However whilst preliminary, our data suggest that it may be possible to use this electrode for hearing preservation. However, further studies are required to determine its definitive advantage over other electrode designs.

CONCLUSION

CI532 is a reliable device offering good initial results and could be an option for hearing preservation although further studies are required.

Intraoperative Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Electrodes Using Mobile Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the electrode status during cochlear implantation (CI) using mobile cone-beam CT (mCBCT).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Fifty-seven patients (7 bilateral surgeries, 64 ears) who underwent CI and who received intraoperative mCBCT imaging.

INTERVENTION

CI and CBCT during surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Electrode location and angular insertion depth determined by intraoperative mCBCT images.

RESULTS

There were six cases with cochlear malformation where intraoperative mCBCT was useful to confirm electrode location. Of 58 ears with a normal cochlear morphology, perimodiolar, straight, and mid-scalar electrodes were used in 30 (cochleostomy; 14 advance off-stylet technique cases), 27 (26 round window [RW] insertion, 1 extended round window [ERW] insertion), and 1 (RW insertion) ears, respectively. Complete scala-tympani (ST) insertion was achieved in 35 ears (14 cochleostomy, 21 RW or ERW insertion). The complete ST-insertion rate was significantly higher with RW or ERW insertion than that for cochleostomy insertion (p = 0.03), although cochleostomy insertion using the advanced off-stylet technique had a similar rate to RW or ERW insertion. The angular insertion depth values (average ± standard deviation) for perimodiolar electrodes (354.4 ± 29.44 degrees) were significantly smaller than those for Flex24 (464.8 ± 43.09 degrees) and Flex28 (518.2 ± 61.91 degrees) electrodes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of CI electrodes using intraoperative mCBCT was comparable to that with fan-beam CT or c-arm-based CBCT. Considering the low radiation dose of mCBCT and its availability in any operation room, mCBCT is the better modality for evaluating cochlear implant electrode arrays.

A New Slim Modiolar Electrode Array for Cochlear Implantation: A Radiological and Histological Study

HYPOTHESIS

To explore the results of a new slim modiolar electrode array (SMA) with respect to intracochlear placement and trauma evaluated by detailed radiologic imaging and histology.

BACKGROUND

Hearing and structure preservation is the goal of cochlear implantation for advanced hearing outcomes. Currently, this is most consistently achieved with thin lateral wall electrodes. Modiolar electrodes are located nearer the modiolus and may provide some electrophysiological advantages, but have a greater tendency for causing insertion trauma.

METHODS

The SMA was implanted in 20 fresh-frozen human temporal bones (TB). All TBs were scanned pre- and postoperatively with cone beam computed tomography. For atraumatic insertion, the round window approach was preferred. Scalar localization and trauma were analyzed by three-dimensional image fusion reconstructions of the pre- and postimplant scans. The TBs underwent histologic examination to validate the radiologic findings.

RESULTS

Insertion through the round window was performed in 19 TBs and through a cochleostomy in one TB. In one TB trauma in the form of scala translocation was identified radiologically and histologically. In the remaining TBs there was no insertion trauma. Adequate modiolar localization of the SMA was found in 19 of 20 TBs. The mean angular insertion depth was 400 degrees without correlation to cochlea size. There was no significant statistical difference between the radiological and histological measurements of electrode localization.

CONCLUSION

The SMA showed consistent and atraumatic insertion results in TBs. Pre- and postimplant cone beam computed tomography with image fusion was shown to be very accurate for the assessment of electrode position and insertion trauma.

Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of electrode discrimination based on electrode to modiolus distance in different cochlear implant models, using image information to estimate the outcomes after an implantation on electrode discrimination METHODS: A descriptive prospective randomized study performed during 16 months. A psychoacoustic platform was used to evaluate patients' electrode discrimination capabilities of patients. For the acquisition of the images, a cone beam computed tomography was used to assess postcochlear implantation of electrodes' position. We considered two other new measurements: the intracochlear position index, which indicates how far is the electrode from the modiolar wall, and the homogeneity factor (HF), which provides us with information about the distance between the electrodes and the modiolus RESULTS: 21 postlingually deaf adults showing different CI models [CI522 (n = 7), CI512 (n = 7), and CI532 (n = 7)] that corresponded to the lateral and perimodiolar array electrodes. The average success rate of the CI522 group was 47%, of the CI512 group was 48%, and of the CI532 group was 77%. There is statistically significant difference between groups CI532-CI522 (p = 0.0033) and CI532-CI512 (p = 0.0027) CONCLUSION: The Nucleus CI532 offers a better perimodiolar placement. HF and IPI measurements provide information about the electrodes location inside the cochlea, being related to electrode discrimination.

3D curved multiplanar cone beam CT reconstruction for intracochlear position assessment of straight electrodes array. A temporal bone and clinical study

A retrospective review of post-op cone beam CT (CBCT) of 8 adult patients and 14 fresh temporal bones that underwent cochlear implantation with straight flexible electrodes array was performed to determine if the position of a long and flexible electrodes array within the cochlear scalae could be reliably assessed with CBCT. An oto-radiologist and two otologists examined the images and assessed the electrodes position. The temporal bone specimens underwent histological analysis for confirm the exact position. The position of the electrodes was rated as scala tympani, scala vestibule, or intermediate position for the electrodes at 180°, 360° and for the apical electrode. In the patient group, for the electrodes at 180° all observers agreed for scala tympani position except for 1 evaluation, while a discrepancy in 3 patients both for the 360° and for the apical electrode assessment were found. In five temporal bones the evaluations were in discrepancy for the 180° electrode, while at 360° a disagreement between raters on the scalar positioning was seen in six temporal bones. A higher discrepancy between was found in assessment of the scalar position of the apical electrode (average pairwise agreement 45.4%, Fleiss k = 0.13). A good concordance was found between the histological results and the consensus between raters for the electrodes in the basal turn, while low agreement (Cohen's k 0.31, pairwise agreement 50%) was found in the identification of the apical electrode position confirming the difficulty to correct identify the electrode position in the second cochlear turn in temporal bones. In conclusion, CBCT is a reliable radiologic exam to correctly evaluate the position of a lateral wall flexible array in implanted patients using the proposed imaging reconstruction method, while some artefacts impede exact evaluation of the position of the apical electrode in temporal bone and other radiological techniques should be preferred in ex vivo studies.

The gray scale value of ear tissues undergoing volume-rendering high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

When the thresholds for VR reconstruction from multi-slice CT images are changed, problems develop when assessing pathologies in the absence of standardized thresholds. The advantages of CBCT include lower radiation exposure compared with other techniques and better visualization of small ear structures. However, a disadvantage is that the scanner provides unstandardized gray scale values, thus not CT numbers (Hounsfield units, HU).

METHODS

We analyzed 88 sets of volume data obtained from temporal bones. The gray scale values were measured in aerated areas (two sites), along the ossicular chain (four sites) and in a bone area (one site) in the external and middle ears, and in soft tissue areas (five sites) and bone areas (two sites) in the inner ear.

RESULTS

The standard male and female gray scale values were 2448-2970 and 2585-3091 for the aerated areas, 3248-4945 and 3359-5223 for the ossicular chains, 3368-4109 and 3371-4147 for soft tissues, and 4790-5776 and 5044-5959 for bone, respectively. Sex significantly affected the values (p<0.05). Significant differences between aerated areas and ossicular chains, and between soft tissues and bone, were evident (all p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Volume-rendering (VR) images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can be standardized simply by using fixed thresholds.

Intra-cochlear electrode tip fold-over

Cochlear implantation has been performed safely for over two decades but still has various minor and major complications. We report two cases of an unusual complication of electrode implantation: tip fold-over of the electrode array within the cochlea. Both cases required undergoing explantation and re-implantation. The frequent use of fine and pre-curved electrodes particularly with the use of an insertion tool necessitates routine postoperative radiological evaluation of the electrode array. Our cases demonstrate the benefit of systematic imaging including the possible use of the Cone Beam CT intraoperatively.

Utility of intraoperative computed tomography for cochlear implantation in patients with difficult anatomy

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

To describe cases that illustrate the utility of intraoperative computed tomography (CT) in cochlear implantation of patients with difficult temporal bone anatomy.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 2-year-old male with congenital X-linked stapes gusher syndrome and a 2-year-old female with enlarged vestibular aqueduct underwent successful cochlear implantation with the help of intraoperative CT. In the latter case, the initial intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy suggested malposition of the electrode, however, was not able to provide details for adjustments. In both cases, intraoperative CT changed the insertion technique of the operating surgeon and allowed for improved electrode positioning. A 47-year-old female with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia and a 55-year-old male with post-meningitis near-total cochlear obliteration underwent successful cochlear implantation with confirmation of electrode position with intraoperative CT. In the former case, the image-guided navigation system was also implemented. Finally, a 72-year-old female underwent cochlear implantation during which intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy suggested intra-cochlear insertion. However, postoperative CT showed the electrode extending into the internal auditory canal (IAC), illustrating the limitations of C-arm fluoroscopy.

INTERVENTION

Intraoperative CT imaging and image-guided navigation system.

CONCLUSION

When faced with challenging temporal bone anatomy, intraoperative CT can provide critical details of the patient's microanatomy that allows for improved localization of the electrode and adjustments in operative techniques for successful cochlear implantation.

Comparison of radiation doses imparted during 128-, 256-, 384-multislice CT-scanners and cone beam computed tomography for intra- and perioperative cochlear implant assessment

PURPOSE

To examine radiation-doses imparted during multislice (MSCT) and cone-beam computed-tomography (CBCT) for perioperative examination of cochlear-implant insertion.

METHODS

Radiation-doses were assessed during standardized petrous-bone CT-protocols at different MSCT ((I) single-source CT-scanner Somatom-Definition-AS+, (II) 2nd generation of dual-source CT-scanner Somatom-Definition-Flash, (III) 3rd generation of dual-source CT-scanner Somatom-Force and at the CBCT Ziehm-Vision-RFD3D ((IV) (a) RFD-3D (Standard-modifier), (b) RFD-3D (Low-dose-modifier)). Image quality was examined by two radiologists appraising electrode-array placement, quality-control of cochlear-implant surgery and complications based on real patients' examinations (n=78).

RESULTS

In MSCT-setting following radiation-doses were assessed (CTDI_w; DLP): (I) 21.5mGy; 216mGycm; (II) 19.7mGy; 195mGycm; (III) 12.7mGy; 127mGycm; in the CBCT setting radiation doses were distributed as follows: (IV) (a) 1.9mGy; 19.4mGycm; (b) 1.2mGy; 12.9mGycm. Overall, image quality was evaluated as good for both, MSCT- and CBCT-examinations, with a good interrater reliability (r=0.81).

CONCLUSION

CBCT bears considerable dose-saving potential for the perioperative examination of cochlear-implant insertion while maintaining adequate image quality.

Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode

AIMS

The Nucleus CI532 cochlear implant incorporates a new precurved electrode array, i.e., the Slim Modiolar electrode (SME), which is designed to bring electrode contacts close to the medial wall of the cochlea while avoiding trauma due to scalar dislocation or contact with the lateral wall during insertion. The primary aim of this prospective study was to determine the final position of the electrode array in clinical cases as evaluated using flat-panel volume computed tomography.

METHODS

Forty-five adult candidates for unilateral cochlear implantation were recruited from 8 centers. Eleven surgeons attended a temporal bone workshop and received further training with a transparent plastic cochlear model just prior to the first surgery. Feedback on the surgical approach and use of the SME was collected via a questionnaire for each case. Computed tomography of the temporal bone was performed postoperatively using flat-panel digital volume tomography or cone beam systems. The primary measure was the final scalar position of the SME (completely in scala tympani or not). Secondly, medial-lateral position and insertion depth were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-four subjects received a CI532. The SME was located completely in scala tympani for all subjects. Pure round window (44% of the cases), extended round window (22%), and inferior and/or anterior cochleostomy (34%) approaches were successful across surgeons and cases. The SME was generally positioned close to the modiolus. Overinsertion of the array past the first marker tended to push the basal contacts towards the lateral wall and served only to increase the insertion depth of the first electrode contact without increasing the insertion depth of the most apical electrode. Complications were limited to tip fold-overs encountered in 2 subjects; both were attributed to surgical error, with both reimplanted successfully.

CONCLUSIONS

The new Nucleus CI532 cochlear implant with SME achieved the design goal of producing little or no trauma as indicated by consistent scala tympani placement. Surgeons should be carefully trained to use the new deployment method such that tip fold-overs and over insertion may be avoided.

Assessment of Cochlear Trauma During Cochlear Implantation Using Electrocochleography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

To assess cochlear trauma during cochlear implantation by electrocochleography (ECoG) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to correlate intraoperative cochlear trauma with postoperative loss of residual hearing.

METHODS

ECoG recordings to tone bursts at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz and click stimuli were recorded before and after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array, using an extracochlear recording electrode. CBCTs were conducted within 6 weeks after surgery. Changes of intraoperative ECoG recordings and CBCT findings were correlated with postoperative threshold shifts in pure-tone audiograms.

RESULTS

Fourteen subjects were included. In three subjects a decrease of low-frequency ECoG responses at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 Hz occurred after insertion of the electrode array. This was associated with no or minimal residual hearing 4 weeks after surgery. ECoG responses to click stimuli were present in six subjects and showed a decrease after insertion of the electrode array in three. This was associated with a mean hearing loss of 21 dB in postoperative pure-tone audiograms. Scalar dislocation of the electrode array was assumed in one subject because of CBCT findings and correlated with a decrease of low-frequency ECoG responses and a complete loss of residual hearing.

CONCLUSION

Hearing loss of ≤11 dB is not associated with detectable decrease in ECoG recordings during cochlear implantation. However, in a majority of patients with threshold shifts of >11 dB or complete hearing loss, an intraoperative decrease of high- or low-frequency ECoG signals occurs, suggesting acute cochlear trauma.

Experimental Simulation of Clinical Borderline Situations in Temporal Bone Specimens After Ossiculoplasty

OBJECTIVES

One reason for insufficient hearing improvement with a distinct air-bone gap after ossiculoplasty with implantation of partial or total ossicular replacement prostheses can be the dislocation or minimal shifting of the prosthesis. The aim of this study was the simulation of common clinical borderline situations with minimal shifting of the prosthesis in temporal bone specimens after ossiculoplasty. It was furthermore the goal to identify these specific situations through imaging by cone beam computed tomography (cbCT) and direct visual inspection using the operation microscope. Additionally, the functional status was evaluated using laser-Doppler vibrometry (LDV).

DESIGN

We used a total of four temporal bone specimens for this study. A reconstruction with a partial ossicular replacement prostheses was performed in three specimens and with a total ossicular replacement prostheses in one specimen, with good initial acoustic properties. Subsequently, one specific type of prosthesis failure was simulated in each specimen, respectively, by minimally shifting, tilting, or bending the prostheses from their initial positions. These changes were introduced step-by-step until a borderline situation just short of complete acoustic decoupling was reached. Each step was examined using both LDV and cbCT and observed through the operation microscope.

RESULTS

LDV was able to quantify the mechanic function of the ossicular chain after most of the manipulation steps by demonstrating the effect of any shifting of the prosthesis on the middle ear transfer function. However, in some situations, the middle ear transfer function was better with a visually more advanced failure of the prosthesis. In addition, cbCT showed most of the steps with excellent resolution and was able to delineate changes in soft tissue (e.g., cartilage covering).

CONCLUSION

cbCT seems to be a promising imaging technique for middle ear problems. As cbCT and LDV exhibited slightly different advantages and disadvantages regarding the demonstration of borderline situations, the combination of both techniques allowed for a more precise evaluation of middle ear reconstructions. Knowledge of the specific characteristics of these methods and their possible combination might help otologists and otosurgeons to refine indications for revision surgery and improve their personal patient counseling.

Contemporary imaging of auditory implants

There have been significant advances in the diversity and effectiveness of hearing technologies in recent years. Implanted auditory devices may be divided into those that stimulate the cochlear hair cells (bone conduction devices and middle ear implants), and those that stimulate the neural structures (cochlear implants and central auditory implants). Contemporary preoperative and postoperative imaging may be used to help individualise implant selection, optimise surgical technique and predict auditory outcome. This review will introduce the concepts behind auditory implants, and explains how imaging is increasingly used to aid insertion and evaluation of these devices.