Glucocorticoid for Hearing Preservation After Cochlear Implantation: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Animal Studies

Intracochlear Drug Delivery Using a Catheter and Dexamethasone-Eluting Electrode Preserves Residual Hearing Post-Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of a cochlear catheter (cannula) for inner ear drug delivery during cochlear implantation. We evaluated the otoprotective effect of L-N-acetylcysteine (L-NAC) administered via a cannula in combination with a dexamethasone-eluting cochlear implant (CI).

STUDY DESIGN

An animal model study.

SETTING

Animal facility of an academic institution.

METHODS

Animals were divided into 8 groups: (1) implantation with a CI; (2) implantation with a dexamethasone-eluting CI (CIDexel); (3) cannula injection of artificial perilymph (Can+AP); (4) cannula injection of Ringer (Can+R); (5) cannula injection of R and CI (Can+CI); (6) cannula injection of R and Dexel (Can+Dexel); (7) cannula injection of 2 mM L-NAC and CI (Can L-NAC 2 mM+CI); or (8) cannula injection of 2mM L-NAC and Dexel (Can L-NAC 2 mM++Dexel). The contralateral ear served as the control group. Hearing thresholds were determined preoperatively, and at postoperative day (POD 7) and POD 30 post-cochlear implantation, using auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). The organ of Corti dissections were performed at POD 30 for hair cell (HC) viability, and oxidative stress assessment using immunostaining.

RESULTS

The L-NAC (2 mM) and dexamethasone-eluting electrode group had significantly lower hearing thresholds than the standard CI, Can L-NAC 2 mM, and Dexel groups. The animal group treated with L-NAC (2 mM) and dexamethasone-eluting electrode showed higher HC viability and reduced oxidative stress.

CONCLUSION

An intracochlear cannula can deliver pharmaceutical interventions without causing additional hearing loss. L-NAC presents strong anti-apoptotic potential and administration through a cannula together with Dexel implantation, and achieves a synergistic effect enhancing the otoprotection.

The Role of Steroids in the Preservation of Hearing and Vestibular Function in Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implant surgery is guided by principles of atraumatic insertion as to protect the inner ear. Previous studies suggest the potential benefit of steroids in patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI), although the optimal route of administration has yet to be determined. We aim to systematically review the human studies of hearing and vestibular function preservation in patients undergoing CI receiving perioperative steroids and to discuss their role.

DATA SOURCES

Search performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases in December 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies comparing several methods of steroid delivery and conventional management for patients undergoing CI were identified. Primary outcomes included hearing and vestibular function preservation. Secondary outcomes included reported adverse events, routes of steroid administration, and the presence of a control group without steroid administration.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies (N = 659) met inclusion criteria. Methodology, doses, route of steroid administration, and follow-up duration differed between most studies. Audiometric, vestibular, and hearing preservation (HP) results were inconsistent. In 12 studies, perioperative steroids were associated with either increased HP or vestibular function preservation. Only two studies reported adverse events related to oral corticosteroid therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a tendency for perioperative steroids to have a positive impact, at least in the short term, on hearing and vestibular function preservation in CI. Topical corticosteroid therapy appears to have a superior risk-benefit profile. There is a need for future carefully designed randomized controlled trials to determine the ideal route of steroid administration and its real impact in the long term. Laryngoscope, 134:3458-3465, 2024.

A preoperative dose of the pyridoindole AC102 improves the recovery of residual hearing in a gerbil animal model of cochlear implantation

Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most common sensory deficit worldwide. Due to the heterogeneity of causes for SNHL, effective treatment options remain scarce, creating an unmet need for novel drugs in the field of otology. Cochlear implantation (CI) currently is the only established method to restore hearing function in profound SNHL and deaf patients. The cochlear implant bypasses the non-functioning sensory hair cells (HCs) and electrically stimulates the neurons of the cochlear nerve. CI also benefits patients with residual hearing by combined electrical and auditory stimulation. However, the insertion of an electrode array into the cochlea induces an inflammatory response, characterized by the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, upregulation of reactive oxygen species, and apoptosis and necrosis of HCs, putting residual hearing at risk. Here, we characterize the small molecule AC102, a pyridoindole, for its protective effects on residual hearing in CI. In a gerbil animal model of CI, AC102 significantly improves the recovery of hearing thresholds across multiple frequencies and confines the cochlear trauma to the directly mechanically injured area. In addition, AC102 significantly preserves auditory nerve fibers and inner HC synapses throughout the whole cochlea. In vitro experiments in an ethanol challenged HT22 cell-line revealed significant and dose-responsive anti-apoptotic effects following the treatment of with AC102. Further, AC102 treatment resulted in significant downregulation of the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in an organotypic ex vivo model of electrode insertion trauma (EIT). These results suggest that AC102's effects are likely elicited during the inflammatory phase of EIT and mediated by anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory properties, highlighting AC102 as a promising compound for hearing preservation during CI. Moreover, since the inflammatory response in CI shares similarities to that in other etiologies of SNHL, AC102 may be inferred as a potential general treatment option for various inner ear conditions.

Sialyllactose preserves residual hearing after cochlear implantation

In individuals with hearing loss, protection of residual hearing is essential following cochlear implantation to facilitate acoustic and electric hearing. Hearing preservation requires slow insertion, atraumatic electrode and delivery of the optimal quantity of a pharmacological agent. Several studies have reported variable hearing outcomes with osmotic pump-mediated steroid delivery. New drugs, such as sialyllactose (SL) which have anti-inflammatory effect in many body parts, can prevent tissue overgrowth. In the present study, the positive effects of the pharmacological agent SL against insults were evaluated in vitro using HEI-OC1 cells. An animal model to simulate the damage due to electrode insertion during cochlear implantation was used. SL was delivered using osmotic pumps to prevent loss of the residual hearing in this animal model. Hearing deterioration, tissue fibrosis and ossification were confirmed in this animal model. Increased gene expressions of inflammatory cytokines were identified in the cochleae following dummy electrode insertion. Following the administration of SL, insertion led to a decrease in hearing threshold shifts, tissue reactions, and inflammatory markers. These results emphasize the possible role of SL in hearing preservation and improve our understanding of the mechanism underlying hearing loss after cochlear implantation.

Evaluating calcium channel blockers and bisphosphonates as otoprotective agents in cochlear implantation hearing preservation candidates

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate potential effects of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and bisphosphonates (BP) on residual hearing following cochlear implantation.

METHODS

Medications of 303 adult hearing preservation (HP) candidates (low frequency pure tone average [LFPTA] of 125, 250, and 500 Hz ≤80 dB HL) were reviewed. Postimplantation LFPTA of patients taking CCBs and BPs were compared to controls matched by age and preimplantation LFPTA.

RESULTS

Twenty-six HP candidates were taking a CCB (N = 14) or bisphosphonate (N = 12) at implantation. Median follow-up was 1.37 years (range 0.22-4.64y). Among subjects with initial HP, 29% (N = 2 of 7) CCB users compared to 50% (N = 2 of 4) controls subsequently lost residual hearing 3-6 months later (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.04-4.32, p = 0.58). None of the four BP patients with initial HP experienced delayed loss compared to 50% (N = 2 of 4) controls with initial HP (OR = 0.00, 95% CI = 0.00-1.95, P = 0.43). Two CCB and one BP patients improved to a LFPTA <80 dB HL following initial unaided thresholds that suggested loss of residual hearing.

DISCUSSION

There were no significant differences in the odds of delayed loss of residual hearing with CCBs or BPs.

CONCLUSION

Further investigation into potential otoprotective adjuvants for maintaining residual hearing following initial successful hearing preservation is warranted, with larger cohorts and additional CCB/BP agents.

Variability in Perioperative Steroid Therapy Regimen for Cochlear Implantation as It Relates to Hearing Preservation

HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to identify practice trends and association between physician training and administration of perioperative steroids for cochlear implantation (CI) as it relates to hearing preservation.

BACKGROUND

Perioperative steroid therapy regimens are postulated to protect residual hearing and improve hearing preservation outcomes in CI.

METHODS

A 27-question online survey was developed by the senior authors using the Qualtrics Survey Tool, then distributed via email from September to November 2022 to otolaryngologists specializing in otology or neurotology and who practice in the United States or Canada.

RESULTS

The survey was sent to 463 physicians, 162 (35.0%) of whom completed the survey. One hundred forty-four (31.1%) responses underwent analysis. All physicians administering preoperative steroids (n = 31) prefer preoperative oral prednisone. Of 143 physicians administering intraoperative steroids, 54.5% prefer intraoperative intravenous dexamethasone. More than half (77.6%) of 85 physicians administering postoperative steroids prefer postoperative oral prednisone. Postoperative steroid administration (p < 0.006) and taper utilization (p < 0.041) were greater among physicians who complete greater than 40 CIs annually (n = 47 [71.2%]; n = 30 [49.2%]) than physicians who complete up to 40 CIs annually (n = 37 [48.7%]; n = 20 [31.3%]), respectively. Physicians practicing for 5 to 20 years after residency are more prevalent in using postoperative steroid tapers than physicians practicing for fewer than 5 years after and more than 20 years after residency (n = 37 [51.4%] versus n = 14 [25.5%], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Consensus is needed about the optimal steroid treatment for CI patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

A Five-Decade Text Mining Analysis of Cochlear Implant Research: Where We Started and Where We Are Heading

Background and Objectives: Since its invention in the 1970s, the cochlear implant (CI) has been substantially developed. We aimed to assess the trends in the published literature to characterize CI. Materials and Methods: We queried PubMed for all CI-related entries published during 1970-2022. The following data were extracted: year of publication, publishing journal, title, keywords, and abstract text. Search terms belonged to the patient's age group, etiology for hearing loss, indications for CI, and surgical methodological advancement. Annual trends of publications were plotted. The slopes of publication trends were calculated by fitting regression lines to the yearly number of publications. Results: Overall, 19,428 CIs articles were identified. Pediatric-related CI was the most dominant sub-population among the age groups, with the highest rate and slope during the years (slope 5.2 ± 0.3, p < 0.001), while elderly-related CIs had significantly fewer publications. Entries concerning hearing preservation showed the sharpest rise among the methods, from no entries in 1980 to 46 entries in 2021 (slope 1.7 ± 0.2, p < 0.001). Entries concerning robotic surgery emerged in 2000, with a sharp increase in recent years (slope 0.5 ± 0.1, p < 0.001). Drug-eluting electrodes and CI under local-anesthesia have been reported only in the past five years, with a gradual rise. Conclusions: Publications regarding CI among pediatrics outnumbered all other indications, supporting the rising, pivotal role of CI in the rehabilitation of children with sensorineural hearing loss. Hearing-preservation publications have recently rapidly risen, identified as the primary trend of the current era, followed by a sharp rise of robotic surgery that is evolving and could define the next revolution.

Immunohistochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptors in the human cochlea

In the present study we investigated the localization of glucocorticoid receptors (GCR) in the human inner ear using immunohistochemistry. Celloidin-embedded cochlear sections of patients with normal hearing (n = 5), patients diagnosed with MD (n = 5), and noise induced hearing loss (n = 5) were immunostained using GCR rabbit affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies and secondary fluorescent or HRP labeled antibodies. Digital fluorescent images were acquired using a light sheet laser confocal microscope. In celloidin-embedded sections GCR-IF was present in the cell nuclei of hair cells and supporting cells of the organ of Corti. GCR-IF was detected in cell nuclei of the Reisner's membrane. GCR-IF was seen in cell nuclei of the stria vascularis and the spiral ligament. GCR-IF was found in the spiral ganglia cell nuclei, however, spiral ganglia neurons showed no GCR-IF. Although GCRs were found in most cell nuclei of the cochlea, the intensity of IF was differential among the different cell types being more intense in supporting cells than in sensory hair cells. The differential expression of GCR receptors found in the human cochlea may help to understand the site of action of glucocorticoids in different ear diseases.

Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function

The cochlear implant (CI) is widely considered to be one of the most innovative and successful neuroprosthetic treatments developed to date. Although outcomes vary, CIs are able to effectively improve hearing in nearly all recipients and can substantially improve speech understanding and quality of life for patients with significant hearing loss. A wealth of research has focused on underlying factors that contribute to success with a CI, and recent evidence suggests that the overall health of the cochlea could potentially play a larger role than previously recognized. This article defines and reviews attributes of cochlear health and describes procedures to evaluate cochlear health in humans and animal models in order to examine the effects of cochlear health on performance with a CI. Lastly, we describe how future biologic approaches can be used to preserve and/or enhance cochlear health in order to maximize performance for individual CI recipients.

Evaluation of prednisolone and prednisolone sodium succinate concentrations in human plasma and inner ear perilymph during cochlear implantation 24 h after intratympanic injection

BACKGROUND

The use of intratympanic (IT) steroids has drastically increased over the past 10-15 years to manage many otological pathologies.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the concentrations of prednisolone and prednisolone sodium succinate (SS) in the plasma and inner ear perilymph of participants who underwent cochlear implantation 24 h after IT injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a prospective comparative randomized study. Twenty participants received an IT injection of prednisolone SS ∼24 h before the cochlear implantation. The other five participants received an IT saline injection and represented the control group. Perilymph and blood were sampled during the cochlear implantation surgery.

RESULTS

Both prednisolone and prednisolone SS were still present in perilymph ∼24 h after the IT administration. Only prednisolone was present in the blood plasma of seven participants (35%).

CONCLUSION

IT injection of prednisolone SS resulted in high perilymph concentrations of prednisolone and prednisolone SS, which could stay in the perilymph for at least 24 h. Using a mini-endoscope during the IT injection may effectively detect barriers infront of the round window membrane, increasing the drug concentration in the inner ear.

SIGNIFICANCE

IT injection is an effective method for delivering prednisolone to the inner ear.

Emerging therapies for human hearing loss

INTRODUCTION

More than 5% of the world's population have a disabling hearing loss which can be managed by hearing aids or implanted electrical devices. However, outcomes are highly variable, and the sound perceived by recipients is far from perfect. Sparked by the discovery of progenitor cells in the cochlea and rapid progress in drug delivery to the cochlea, biological and pharmaceutical therapies are currently in development to improve the function of the cochlear implant or eliminate the need for it altogether.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights progress in emerging regenerative strategies to restore hearing and adjunct therapies to augment the cochlear implant. Novel approaches include the reprogramming of progenitor cells to restore the sensory hair cell population in the cochlea, gene therapy and gene editing to treat hereditary and acquired hearing loss. A detailed review of optogenetics is also presented as a technique that could enable optical stimulation of the spiral ganglion neurons, replacing or complementing electrical stimulation.

EXPERT OPINION

Increasing evidence of substantial reversal of hearing loss in animal models, alongside rapid advances in delivery strategies to the cochlea and learnings from clinical trials will amalgamate into a biological or pharmaceutical therapy to replace or complement the cochlear implant.

Inner Ear Pharmacotherapy for Residual Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review

Cochlear implantation initiates an inflammatory cascade in which both acute insertion trauma and chronic foreign body reaction lead to intracochlear fibrosis and loss of residual hearing. Several strategies have been proposed to attenuate the local reactive process after implantation, including intracochlear drug delivery. The present study gives an overview of what is being investigated in the field of inner ear therapeutics and cochlear implant surgery. The aim is to evaluate its potential benefit in clinical practice. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases identifying comparative prospective studies examining the effect of direct inner ear drug application on mechanical cochlear trauma. Both animal and human studies were considered and all studies were assessed for quality according to the validated risk of bias tools. Intracochlear administration of drugs is a feasible method to reduce the local inflammatory reaction following cochlear implantation. In animal studies, corticosteroid use had a significant effect on outcome measures including auditory brainstem response, impedance, and histological changes. This effect was, however, only durable with prolonged drug delivery. Significant differences in outcome were predominantly seen in studies where the cochlear damage was extensive. Six additional reports assessing non-steroidal agents were found. Overall, evidence of anti-inflammatory effects in humans is still scarce.

A rabbit model to investigate temporomandibular joint osteochondral regeneration

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was 2-fold: (1) to describe the rabbit temporomandibular joint (TMJ) anatomy and (2) to provide a detailed, step-by-step description of a minimally invasive approach to perform a standard osteochondral TMJ defect that can be used to investigate the regenerative potential of biomaterials.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was performed in 2 steps. In the first, a total of 8 rabbit carcasses (n = 16 joints) were used to study the normal TMJ anatomy and histology to develop a minimally invasive approach to access the articulating surface of the condyle to perform a standard osteochondral defect. In the second, the surgical procedure was performed in 10 live animals to evaluate the feasibility of the model and to evaluate the regenerative potential of a biodegradable light-cured hydrogel seeded with stem cells (results not shown).

RESULTS

The cartilage of the mandibular condyle showed 4 layers: fibrous, proliferative, hypertrophic, and a zone of calcified cartilage. Positive safranin O staining was observed in the cartilage. The mean duration of the procedure (from incision to last stitch) was 35.5 (±9.21) minutes. All animals survived the procedures without any major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This animal model represents an easy and nonmorbid surgical approach to rabbit TMJ.

Advances in hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Advancements in cochlear implant surgical approaches and electrode designs have enabled preservation of residual acoustic hearing. Preservation of low-frequency hearing allows cochlear implant users to benefit from electroacoustic stimulation, which improves performance in complex listening situations, such as music appreciation and speech understanding in noise. Despite the relative high rates of success of hearing preservation, postoperative acoustic hearing outcomes remain unpredictable.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thin, flexible, lateral wall arrays are preferred for hearing preservation. Both shortened and thin, lateral wall arrays have shown success with hearing preservation and the optimal implant choice is an issue of ongoing investigation. Electrocochleography can monitor cochlear function during and after insertion of the electrode array. The pathophysiology of hearing loss acutely after cochlear implant may differ from that involved in delayed hearing loss following cochlear implant. Emerging innovations may reduce cochlear trauma and improve hearing preservation.

SUMMARY

Hearing preservation is possible using soft surgical techniques and electrode arrays designed to minimize cochlear trauma; however, a subset of patients suffer from partial to total loss of acoustic hearing months to years following surgery despite evidence of residual apical hair cell function. Early investigations in robotic-assisted insertion and dexamethasone-eluting implants show promise.

Hearing Protection Outcomes of Analog Electrode Arrays Coated with Different Drug-Eluting Polymer Films Implanted into Guinea Pig Cochleae

Objective

To investigate the hearing protection outcomes of different drug-eluting analog electrode arrays implanted into guinea pig cochleae.

Methods

Sixty guinea pigs were randomly divided into a negative control group and five experimental groups implanted separately with blank (drug carrier), dexamethasone (DXM), aracytine (Ara-C), Ara-C+DXM, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) eluting analog electrode arrays. Micro CT was used to supervise the surgical procedure. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds of the guinea pigs were measured and analyzed.

Results and Conclusions

Compared with the negative control, all other groups showed a significant increase in ABR threshold (p<0.001) after surgery. Among them, there was no obvious difference between the blank (0 vs 90 days: 59.70±10.57 vs 64.60±9.47 dB SPL) and the NAD+ group (0 vs 90 days: 59.90±9.87 vs 64.70±8.65 dB SPL). On the other hand, the ABR thresholds in the DXM (0 days: 58.10±10.73 dB SPL; 90 days: 51.70±9.07 dB SPL) and the Ara-C group (0 days: 59.00±10.05 dB SPL; 90 days: 51.60±8.48 dB SPL) decreased significantly compared with the former two groups (p<0.001). However, the Ara-C+DXM group showed no further benefit (p>0.05). In addition, a significantly higher survival rate of spiral ganglion neurons in cochleae was observed in the Ara-C and/or DXM groups.

Systemic methylprednisolone for hearing preservation during cochlear implant surgery: A double blinded placebo-controlled trial

AIM

To assess whether a single, peri-operative, high dose of methylprednisolone can improve the preservation of residual acoustic hearing following cochlear implantation (CI).

METHODS

This was a double blinded placebo-controlled trial, performed in a tertiary academic centre. The hypothesis was that methylprednisolone would improve the preservation of hearing, and lower electrode impedances. Adult patients (18-85 years) with hearing at 85 dB or better at 500 Hz in the ear to be implanted were randomly allocated to either treatment (methylprednisolone, 1g administered intravenously upon induction of anaesthesia) or control (normal saline infusion). As per standard clinical practice, all patients received a routine dose of dexamethasone (8 mg intravenously) on induction of anaesthesia. Implantation was undertaken with a slim and flexible lateral wall electrode via the round window. Surgical technique was routine, with adherence to soft surgical principles. The primary outcome was hearing preservation within 20 dB at 500 Hz, 12 months following cochlear implantation. Secondary outcomes included hearing preservation at 6 weeks and 3 months, monopolar electrode impedance, and Consonant-Vowel-Consonant (CVC) Phoneme scores at 3 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled into the control group and 48 patients received the steroid. The number of patients achieving hearing preservation at 12 months did not differ significantly between those receiving methylprednisolone treatment and the controls. There were no differences in hearing preservation at any frequency at either 6 weeks or 3 months after implantation. Neither CVC phoneme scores nor electrode impedances differed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper demonstrates that high-dose local steroid injection at surgery was not effective in preventing a loss of residual hearing, improving speech perception, or lowering electrode impedances. The findings were contrary to the experimental literature, and emerging clinical evidence that steroid elution from implant electrodes influences cochlear biology in humans. We found no evidence to support the widely-held practice of administering intravenous steroids in the perioperative period, in an attempt to preserve residual hearing.

Induction, Treatment, and Prevention of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis-A Systematic Review of Comparative Animal Studies

PURPOSE

Several animal models of temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA) have been described for more than the past 2 decades. The aim of this study was 2-fold: 1) to compile and summarize the evidence of animal studies that compare different forms to induce, treat (disease already established), or prevent (after trauma) TMJA; and 2) to address the following focused question: what is the quality of reporting in these studies?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was conducted. Animal studies conducted up to October 2019 comparing at least 2 procedures to induce, treat (disease already established), or prevent (after trauma) TMJA were considered. Compliance with the Animal Research Reporting In Vivo Experiments guidelines was checked for all studies. Studies evaluating treatment of TMJA or preventive measures also were evaluated using the SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation's risk of bias tool for animal studies.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were included. The studies were evaluated for feasibility regarding data synthesis, and a meta-analysis was not suitable because of methodological differences, mainly regarding the animal model chosen and surgical procedures performed to induce TMJA. In 17 articles, authors aimed to investigate different procedures to induce TMJA (fibrous, fibro-osseous, or bony). In 7 articles, different treatment or preventive strategies were compared. The sheep was the most used animal in models of TMJA. Only 25% (6 of 24) of studies reported some step to minimize bias (ie, blinding of investigators, randomization procedures, or allocation concealment). Approximately 54% (13 of 24) of articles clearly commented on study limitations and potential sources of bias. Further animal studies on TMJA should consider improving their reporting standards to increase their validity and improve the reproducibility of animal experiments.

Development of a rapidly made, easily personalized drug-eluting polymer film on the electrode array of a cochlear implant during surgery

OBJECTIVE

To develop a drug-eluting polymer film which can be easily personalized and rapidly made on the electrode array of a cochlear implant during surgery.

METHODS

A precursor solution was prepared with poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) and trichloromethane. Using a dip-coating method, the silicone electrode array (HiFocus 1J, Advanced Bionics) was coated in polymer film produced from the precursor solution containing one of three drugs: dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DSP), cytosine arabinoside hydrochloride (Ara-C), or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD), and the release of these drugs from the polymer film was studied. The drug-eluting film on the electrode array was analyzed by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). The water contact angle and the impedance of the electrode array were measured before and after coating. Drug release kinetics was evaluated in a quasi-stationary release model, using high performance liquid chromatography every 24 h for 15 days.

RESULTS

Five electrode arrays were tested with each of the three drugs in the polymer film coating. Before and after coating, ESEM studies revealed that the drug-loaded PLGA coating yielded a smooth covering with an average thickness of 1.02 ± 0.05 μm. The mass of the coated electrode increased by 1.00 ± 0.03 mg. The water contact angle decreased after coating (102 ± 0.6° vs 77 ± 1.6°, p < 0.01) but there was no significant change in the average impedance of the electrodes after coating (0.9 ± 0.22 kΩ vs 1.0 ± 0.18 kΩ, p > 0.05). An in vitro drug kinetics study revealed a faster release in the first 24 h (63.4 ± 0.6%) and a sustained release over the following 15 days (78.3 ± 1.7% in 2 days, 95.6 ± 1.0% in 7 days and 99.1 ± 0.4% in 14 days). The release rate was not affected by the drug, dose or the thickness of the coating.

CONCLUSION

The dip-coating method is feasible for rapid casting of a drug-eluting PLGA film on an electrode array during CI surgery. The coated electrode array maintained its original morphology and became more hydrophilic. The loaded drug is released in a sustained manner and is easily regulated, and so the method might represent a potential application for clinical use in cochlear implantation.