Long-term Outcomes of Balloon Dilation for Persistent Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

Balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube for obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction in adults

BACKGROUND

Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) causes symptoms and signs of pressure dysregulation in the middle ear, and is associated with tympanic membrane retraction, otitis media with effusion, and chronic otitis media. Interventions aiming to improve symptoms can be non-surgical or surgical, including balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube, also known as balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) for obstructive ETD. However, existing published evidence for the effectiveness and safety of BET remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube in adults with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid M>DLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; Clinicaltrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The final search was updated on 18th January 2024. There were no restrictions on language, publication date or study setting.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials were included if they allocated adult participants with chronic obstructive ETD to treatment randomly and compared BET with non-surgical treatment, no treatment, or other surgical treatment. Studies with other designs were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently selected trials using predetermined inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias, extracted data, and rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to GRADEpro. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model and interpreted according to the most recent version of the Cochrane Handbook. Predefined primary outcomes were obstructive ETD symptoms, Eustachian tube function (objective or semi-objective tests), or serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were hearing, tympanic membrane abnormalities, quality of life, and other adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials were identified with 684 randomised participants across three comparisons: BET versus non-surgical treatment (five trials, 422 participants), BET versus no treatment (sham surgery; one trial, 17 participants), and BET versus other surgery (four trials, 275 participants). None of the studies were rated with an overall low risk of bias. Comparing BET to non-surgical treatment up to three months, there is low-certainty evidence showing that BET may reduce patient-reported ETD symptoms (change in ETDQ-7: mean difference (MD) -1.66 (95% CI -2.16 to -1.16; I2 = 63%; 4 RCTs, 362 participants)). There is very low-certainty evidence that BET may improve ETD as assessed by objective or semi-objective measures (improvement in tympanometry: RR 2.51 (95% CI 1.82 to 3.48; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 369 participants). Between three and 12 months, the evidence is very uncertain whether BET reduces ETDQ-7: MD -0.55 (-1.31 to 0.21; 1 RCT, 24 participants). The evidence is very uncertain whether BET improves ETD as assessed by objective or semi-objective measures (improvement in tympanometry: RR 2.54 (95% CI 0.91 to 7.12)). Evidence was downgraded for risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness, or a combination of these. Comparing BET to no treatment (sham surgery trial) up to three months, there is very low-certainty evidence that BET improves ETD as assessed by patient-reported ETD symptoms (change in ETDQ-7: MD -0.54 (95% CI -2.55 to 1.47; 1 RCT, 17 participants)). Between three and 12 months, the evidence is very uncertain whether BET improves ETD as assessed by ETDQ-7 (MD 0.16 (95% CI -0.75 to 1.07; 1 RCT, 17 participants)). Evidence was downgraded for indirectness and twice for imprecision. Although there were no serious adverse events reported, these studies were underpowered to detect adverse events and were performed by highly trained and experienced investigators under strict study protocols. This could underestimate the true risk of adverse events by less experienced clinicians in everyday clinical practice. Evidence was rated as very low certainty, downgraded for risk of bias, imprecision, and indirectness.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

BET may lead to a clinically meaningful improvement in ETD symptoms compared to non-surgical or no treatment (in the form of sham surgery) at up to three months. The effects of BET on ETD compared to non-surgical treatment are very uncertain beyond three months. However, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low, with the studies being underpowered to detect adverse events. The findings of this review should help to inform further BET research and guidelines. Future research should focus on longer-term outcomes and the incidence of adverse events or complications in real-world practice settings.

In-office Eustachian Tube Dilation Reduces Symptoms Among Patients With Barometric Challenges

INTRODUCTION

Balloon dilation of the eustachian tube has gained ground in the treatment of chronic dysfunction. A new indication for a larger group of patients has emerged, which is characterized by barochallenge only, which affects even more patients. Given the recent validation of the balloon dilation, we set out to explore if this procedure could be useful in treating this specific sub-group of patients in an in-office setting.

METHODS

Balloon dilation was performed using inly nasal cottonoids soaked in 2% tretracainephenylephrine combined with xylocaine nasal spray and lidocaine/prilocaine gel and a mild oral sedative. The effect of eustachian tube balloon dilation on the function of the eustachian tube was evaluated by using the eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) and a VAS score. The questionnaires were completed beforehand and 3 months and 12 months postoperatively to determine subjective surgical success.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-six balloon dilation were performed in 132 participants. The results from the ETDQ-7 questionnaire and VAS scores showed a significant improvement in symptoms during pressurization after eustachian tube balloon dilation (p = 0.0001). A mean pain score during procedure in local anesthesia was 3.4 on a scale from 1 to 10.

CONCLUSION

Eustachian tube balloon dilation significantly reduced symptoms of eustachian tube dysfunction during non-physiological pressure, which was determined by ETDQ-7 and Vas scores. Additionally, we found that the procedure is well suited for private practice or the outpatient clinic, using local anesthetics and a mild sedative.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 135:361-365, 2025.

Consensus Statement: Postoperative Management After Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube

OBJECTIVES

Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) is widely recognized as a minimally invasive treatment for obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). We employed a Delphi consensus methodology to develop recommendations for the clinical management of BDET in cases of obstructive ETD.

METHODS

A Delphi panel consisting of 26 expert physicians specializing in otology participated in two rounds of anonymous, iterative questionnaires. Consensus was defined as agreement from ≥70% of the panelists on a recommendation, while disagreement was defined as <70% agreement. The responses from the Delphi study were analyzed using both the content validity ratio and Kendall's coefficient of concordance.

RESULTS

The panel finally evaluated 26 topics, reaching agreement on 9 and failing to reach consensus on 17 after two rounds. While consensus was not achieved regarding the postoperative follow-up period, a duration of 12 months was most commonly adopted. The Valsalva maneuver and questionnaire responses were identified as the most agreed-upon postoperative assessment tools following BDET.

CONCLUSION

Consensus was reached on several recommendations for managing BEDT in obstructive ETD. This agreement will guide future research aimed at defining standard postoperative management for BEDT.

Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty-A Feasible Double-Blinded Sham Surgery Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol to Study Efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty (BET) is used to treat obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) and recurrent otitis media with effusion (OME). However, there are no indisputable evidence of its efficacy. Here, we present a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (MDRCT) design to evaluate the efficacy of BET, and the results of a pilot trial with 3- and 12-months' follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective MDRCT. For a pilot study, OETD (n = 10) and OME (n = 5) patients were recruited and followed. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. Participants were randomized at beginning of the operation to active or sham surgery. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia. Controls were performed in double-blinded manner (both patient and physician), at 3 and 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Altogether, 20 ears were treated and followed for 12 months, including 14 active BETs and 6 sham surgeries. Both the active and sham surgery were performed under local anesthesia without problems or deviations from the protocol. There were no differences in the preoperative symptoms (ETDQ-7) or objective measures (tympanometry, Valsalva and Toynbee maneuvers, tubomanometry, Eustachian tube score) between active and sham surgery arms. During follow-up, we noticed largely similar reduction in subjective symptoms and improvement in Eustachian tube score both in active and sham surgery arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The pilot study demonstrates that our MDRCT protocol is feasible, and that blinded RCTs are dearly needed to objectively measure the efficacy of BET.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:1874-1881, 2024.

Eustachian tube balloon dilation

Eustachian tube dysfunction is a frequent pathology of middle-ear ventilation, leading to many more or less disabling otologic symptoms. Severity varies from simple otitis media with effusion to aggressive chronic otitis or cholesteatoma. First-line treatment is medical, but surgery can also be proposed. It consists in balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube, in order to increase ventilation and improve symptoms. It is performed in second-line in patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction confirmed by tubomanometry, after failure of local drug treatment. It can be performed under general or local anesthesia but it is mandatory to use a medical device with market authorization for this indication. The main aim of this surgical note is to describe the technique of balloon dilation in the treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction and the three balloon models with CE label and market authorization currently available in France and in Europe. Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube appears to be a promising option to restore natural middle-ear ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction.

Prospective Evaluation of the Efficacy of Isolated Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty: Short- and Medium-term Follow-up Results Based on Tubomanometry, ETDQ-7, Tympanometry, and Valsalva Maneuver

Introduction  Balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) allows the treatment of the main etiology of eustachian tube disfunction (ETD). Objective  To evaluate the efficacy of isolated BET, through objective and subjective results, in the short and medium term, in patients with chronic obstructive ETD. Methods  Adult patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive ETD who underwent BET between January 2018 and December 2020 were enrolled in the study. We performed a prospective observational study of BET efficacy, by comparing subjective data, based on the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7), and objective data, obtained by tympanometry, objective Valsalva maneuver and tubomanometry, prior to BET with these outcome tools on postprocedure follow-up. Results  In total, 30 BETs were performed and analyzed. There were no complications with the procedure. Analysis of BET efficacy was performed in the short-term (average of 7.5 weeks) and in the medium-term (average of 8 months). There was a significant reduction ( p  < 0.0001) in the total ETDQ-7 score from baseline to both follow-up periods. A normalization of the ETDQ-7 score was observed in 60 and 83.3% of the performed procedures, in the short- and medium-term, respectively. In tubomanometry, we verified a significant improvement ( p  < 0.0001) at all pressures, with a normalization of tubomanometry values in 53.3% and 43.3% of cases in the short- and medium-term, respectively. Tympanogram normalization occurred in 71.4% of patients with abnormal preoperative assessments. Conclusion  As an isolated procedure, BET results in significant improvements in symptomatology and objective metric results. This, associated with its safety profile, currently makes BET the most indicated therapeutic option in refractory obstructive ETD.

Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Symptoms Following Balloon Dilation

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians increasingly perform balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) to treat obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) refractory to medical management. Reported complications have been limited and include patulous Eustachian tube dysfunction (PETD). This multicenter study investigates the incidence of PETD and associated factors.

METHODS

Consecutive patients at three academic centers undergoing BDET (January 2014-November 2019) for OETD refractory to medical therapy were included. PETD was diagnosed by patient-reported symptoms of autophony of voice and/or breathing. Associated factors studied include age, sex, comorbidities, balloon size, duration of inflation, repeat BDET, and adjunctive procedures.

RESULTS

BDET procedures (n = 295 Eustachian tubes) were performed on 182 patients. Mean age was 38.4 years (SD 21.0; range 7-78) and 41.2% were female. Twenty cases of PETD (6.8% of procedures; 9.3% of patients) occurred following BDET. Risk of PETD did not vary by institution, comorbidities, or adjunctive procedure. Age ≤18 years (adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24, 8.54; p = 0.02), repeat BDET (RR = 3.26; 95% CI: 2.15, 4.96; p < 0.001), and severe preoperative Eustachian tube inflammation (RR = 2.83; 95% CI: 1.10, 7.28; p = 0.03) were associated with increased risk of developing PETD in the multivariable model. Most symptoms were reported as mild or intermittent.

CONCLUSION

BDET caused PETD symptoms in approximately 7% of dilated Eustachian tubes in this study with increased risk for younger patients and those with severe inflammation or undergoing repeat dilations. Although most cases were self-limited, symptoms can persist. Awareness of risk factors may aid clinicians in limiting this complication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:3152-3157, 2023.

CT and MRI in the Preoperative Planning of Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: Literature Review

Balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube (BET) is a surgical treatment method for Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD), which relieves the symptoms in the majority of cases. However, there are potential intraoperative risks associated with BET; the decision-making process with regard to indications for BET is not standardized up to date. The objective of this study was to review the role of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative planning of BET. The literature review is based on a database search performed in August 2022. BET is classified into transtympanic and nasopharyngeal. CT of the temporal bone provides good visualization of the site of obstruction, which allows to choose the adequate approach. Transtympanic approach is associated with risks of internal carotid artery damage due to possible carotid canal anomalies. This risk can be prevented with preoperative CT scan of the temporal bone. In case of nasopharyngeal BET, there is no sufficient data considering risks of possible artery damage, although CT can provide accurate measurements of ET. MRI is useful for differential diagnosis of conditions imitating ETD, such as endolymphatic hydrops and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Thus, it is feasible to perform CT and MRI before BET to personalize the management of ETD patients.

Balloon Eustachian tuboplasty for obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction: retrospective multicentre cohort study of 248 patients

OBJECTIVE

To present the results after balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) in patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) grouped up into: baro-challenge, chronic serous otitis media and adhaesive otitis media.

METHODS

A retrospective study was carried out on patients who underwent BET surgery. As outcome measures, otoscopy, tympanometry, Eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) and ability to perform the Valsalva manoeuvre were recorded at baseline and at 3, 12 and 24 months after BET. A p value of 0.05 was used to indicate a statistically significant difference for all statistical tests.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nineteen ears (248 patients) were included with a 3-month follow-up, 272 ears had a 12-month follow-up, and 171 ears had 24-month follow-up. Globally, a statistical significance improvement in all groups in all outcome measures was found. According to BET indication, in the baro-challenge group, there was no improvement in otoscopy, but ETDQ-7, Valsalva manoeuvre and tympanogram improved significantly. In the chronic serous otitis media group, otoscopy, ETDQ-7 and Valsalva manoeuvre were significantly improved in all the three timelines, including the avoidance of a new transtympanic tube after the BET in over 80% of cases. In the adhaesive otitis media group, Valsalva manoeuvre improved significantly, ETDQ-7 decreased and tympanogram improved but not significantly. Few mild complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

BET is an effective method for the treatment of OETD in all etiologic groups. The greatest benefit was observed in patients with baro-challenge. A long-term follow-up is recommended since the benefit seems to increase over time.

Caution in Transnasal Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube: Middle Ear Penetration of Catheter Tip in a Cadaveric Model

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the degree to which transnasal eustachian tube (ET) dilation balloon catheters are able to be passed through the ET in a cadaver model.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

A cadaveric study of 8 cadaver heads (16 ears), which underwent transnasal ET insertion with a 3 × 20-mm balloon catheter with transtympanic endoscopic visualization and grading.

RESULTS

Catheter tip incursion into the protympanum or mesotympanum occurred in all ears. Radiological validation was obtained with correlation to published ET length data.

CONCLUSION

Middle ear incursion of balloon catheter tips can be demonstrated in a cadaver model and highlights the ongoing need for both caution in novel surgical techniques and evolution in device design.

A Systematic Review of Eustachian Tube Procedures for Baro-challenge Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of Eustachian tube procedures for the treatment of baro-challenge Eustachian tube dysfunction.

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, databases, including PubMed (National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health), Scopus (Elsevier), and CINAHL (EBSCO), were searched for articles examining the effectiveness of Eustachian tube procedures for baro-challenge Eustachian tube dysfunction. Outcome measures included symptom resolution, ability to return to work, equalization problems (EP) scores, Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) scores, and pressure chamber testing parameters. Pooled meta-analysis was performed for dichotomous measures and ETDQ-7 scores.

RESULTS

Eleven articles with 81 patients were included. Seventy-two patients from 10 articles underwent balloon Eustachian tube dilation; nine patients in 1 study underwent laser Eustachian tuboplasty (LET). All 81 patients were preoperatively symptomatic with barometric pressure change, and 26/30 (86.7%) were unable to work due to symptoms. On meta-analysis, after balloon dilation Eustachian tuboplasty (BDET), 82.5% (n = 30 [95% confidence interval: 42%-100%]) had improvement in ability to valsalva, 79.1% (n = 16 [57.9%-94.1%]) in ability to return to work, and 84.3% (n = 69 [69.8%-94.7%]) in any symptom. Of 25 patients with individual ETDQ-7 scores, 79.1% [51.4, 96.9] had improvements after BDET. For four case series with 36 patients, ETDQ-7 scores decreased by 1.2 [0.7, 1.7] (p < 0.00001). Of 20 patients with preoperative ETDQ-7 scores >2.0, there was a mean decrease of 2.1 [1.3, 2.8] (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

From the available evidence, Eustachian tube procedures appear to be effective at improving symptoms of baro-challenge Eustachian tube dysfunction. However, higher quality evidence is needed to support making definite recommendations for the use of balloon Eustachian tube dilation or LET for these patients. Laryngoscope, 132:2473-2483, 2022.

[Balloon dilation with stent implantation for the treatment of Eustachian tube obstruction]

When the Eustachian tube is dysfunctional, the external air cannot enter the middle ear, resulting in a negative pressure state in the middle ear, which can cause a series of pathological changes in the middle ear. In this paper, 13 patients with recurrence of otitis media after balloon dilatation of the Eustachian tube were treated with stenting in the Eustachian tube for Eustachian tube dysfunction with satisfactory results, and this method can provide a reference for the clinical treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction.

The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction in Children: Anatomical Considerations and Current Trends in Invasive Therapeutic Approaches

The eustachian tube (ET) has a crucial role in the physiology of the middle ear. Thus, any condition that renders the tube dysfunctional is directly implicated with middle ear pathophysiology, like in the case of acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion. Children are more vulnerable to pathologies of the middle ear, primarily due to the immature development of their eustachian tubes. Otitis media with effusion, apart from being a burden for hearing, with direct consequences for speech development, may also be implicated in cholesteatoma formation. Medical therapy is not practically effective for the treatment of effusion. Moreover, the established surgical approaches, like grommets and adenoidectomy, deal only indirectly with the problem since they are not addressing the dysfunctional ET itself. An emerging interventional approach that intends to restore the function of the tube is the transnasal balloon dilation of the cartilaginous part of the ET. Growing international experience indicates that this promising technique is safe and effective. In the current review, we aim to provide background information on the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the ET and to present the progress of the balloon dilation technique with emphasis on pediatric patients.

Association Between Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 Scores and Eustachian Tube Function Test Results in Symptomatic Patients With a Normal Drum

Background and Objectives

We investigated the clinical validity of and correlation between the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) scores and the eustachian tube function test (ETFT) results in patients with a normal drum.

Subjects and Methods

The study included 49 patients (93 ears) with unilateral or bilateral ear fullness over >3 months. All patients were administered the ETDQ-7 survey and underwent the ETFT on the same day. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the association between the results were statistically analyzed.

Results

ETDQ-7 scores were not significantly correlated with the ETFT results or with middle ear pressure. ETDQ-7 scores in patients with eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) were significantly higher than those in patients with normal ETFT results (p=0.039) when ETD was defined as a pressure change <10 daPa on the ETFT. The area under the ROC curve was 0.631, with a sensitivity of 37.0% and specificity of 89.4%.

Conclusions

The ETDQ-7 has limited clinical significance in patients with ETD but a normal drum. Therefore, concomitant objective tests should be performed to diagnose patients with ETD.

Revisiting the Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Nine-Step Test for Obstructive and Patulous Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

The nine-step test is a classical method for evaluating Eustachian tube function. It directly assesses the patient’s capacity to equilibrate middle ear pressure by swallowing. However, there are insufficient studies to appraise its diagnostic performance. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off value of the nine-step test in patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (oETD) and patulous Eustachian tube (PET). Enrolled subjects were divided into three groups. Control (50 ears of healthy volunteers), oETD (19 ears with oETD), and PET (29 ears with PET). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of maximal peak pressure difference (ETTmd) in the nine-step test. Both the oETD group and the PET group showed decreased ETTmd. The nine-step test showed moderate accuracy when used to diagnose oETD (area under the curve = 0.875) and PET (area under the curve = 0.769). The highest diagnostic performance was observed when the cut-off value was 13 daPa for both the oETD group (sensitivity = 73.7%, specificity = 90.0%) and the PET group (sensitivity = 58.6%, specificity = 90.0%). The nine-step test has moderate diagnostic performance for oETD and PET.

Comparison of Electrocoagulation Tuboplasty and Continued Medical Therapy for Treating Persistent Eustachian Tube Dysfunction With Hypertrophic Mucosa Disease

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this trial was to compare outcomes of electrocoagulation tuboplasty and continued medical therapy for treating persistent Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) with hypertrophic mucosa disease in the Eustachian tube (ET) orifice.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, case-control trial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with persistent ETD were recruited and allocated to electrocoagulation tuboplasty and continued medical therapy groups. The ETD questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) score and objective parameters were compared between the groups at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with a decrease in ETDQ-7 scores was greater in the electrocoagulation group than in the medical therapy group at the 6-month follow-up (53.49% and 34.38%, respectively; p = .158), but the difference was not statistically significant. However, at the 12-month follow-up, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients with a decrease in ETDQ-7 scores in the electrocoagulation group (88.37% and 40.63%, respectively; p = .001). Additionally, a significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of the proportion of patients who improved 12 months after the treatment (tympanometry: 72.09% and 9.38%, respectively; p = .001; air-bone gap: 79.07% and 25.00%, respectively; p = .001; tympanic membrane status: 62.79% and 0.00%, respectively). In addition, the proportion of patients with improvements in the ET inflammation score was significantly different between the groups at 6-month (67.44% and 34.38%, respectively; p = .009) and 12-month (93.02% and 34.38%; p = .001) follow-ups. No device- or procedure-related serious adverse events were reported in any patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Electrocoagulation Eustachian tuboplasty appears to be a safe and feasible procedure for adult persistent ETD with hypertrophic mucosa disease in the ET orifice, and is superior to continued medical management alone. The improvements in ETDQ-7 and objective parameters persisted for 12 months.

Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube with a seeker-based device: A registry of 169 patients

OBJECTIVE

To collect real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube using a seeker-based device in patients with persistent/chronic symptoms of Eustachian tube dysfunction.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, single-arm registry was conducted from June 2018 through August 2020 at 10 US centers, including tertiary care and private practices. Primary endpoints included mean change from baseline in the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) and the serious related adverse event rate. Secondary endpoints include changes in middle ear assessments, surgical intervention rate, and changes in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test and Work and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 169 participants were treated with balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube, with 166 and 154 participants completing the 6-week and 6-month follow-ups, respectively. Repeated measures analysis of the change in ETDQ-7 scores indicated statistically significant improvement (-2.1; 95% CI -2.40, -1.84; P < .0001) at 6-month follow-up. The minimum clinically important difference of improvement was achieved by 85% of participants at 6 months. Four nonserious adverse events were reported. Middle ear functional assessments were improved in the majority of participants with abnormal baseline findings. There were no statistically significant differences in the change from baseline ETDQ-7 scores between participants who had concurrent procedures and those who did not. WPAI scores demonstrated significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

Real-world evidence supports the clinical studies demonstrating that balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube with a seeker-based device is a safe and effective procedure to treat ETD symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Repeat Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilation Outcomes in Adults With Chronic Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

With increased focus on surgical management of the eustachian tube, clarifying management decisions benefits patients and surgeons. In this study, we examine the value of repeating the balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) procedure in patients who did not improve after the initial BDET.

STUDY DESIGN

Level IV retrospective review of 145 BDETs performed on 86 patients between January 1, 2014, and May 1, 2019, identified 10 patients who underwent BDET more than once.

SETTING

Managed care community otolaryngology practice.

METHODS

Demographic and outcome data were collected on both single and repeat BDET cohorts.

RESULTS

The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire 7 (ETDQ-7) was used as the primary outcome measure when comparing single vs repeat BDET cohorts. Generally, the 2 cohorts were similar in terms of sex and age distribution. Tobacco use and radioallergosorbent test-positive results were greater proportionally in the repeat BDET cohort. Preoperative ETDQ-7 scores were similar in both cohorts. Single BDET patients overall showed significant improvement in ETDQ-7 scores. ETDQ-7 scores for repeat BDET patients who did not improve after the first procedure similarly did not demonstrate improvement after the second procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Inevitably, some patients will not improve after an initial BDET procedure. The utility of a repeated BDET procedure should be considered in determining how to manage such failures. The results of this limited study suggest that patients who fail to improve meaningfully on ETDQ-7 scores after the initial procedure are unlikely to show substantial improvements after a repeated procedure.

Predictive value of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 for identifying obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review to determine if a total score of ≥14.5 (mean score ≥ 2.1) on the ETDQ-7 accurately identifies patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (OETD) on impedance tympanometry (peak compliance <0.2 mL or middle ear pressure of -100 daPa) or other objective measures of OETD.

METHODS

A systematic review without a meta-analysis was performed of studies in four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) that used the ETDQ-7 and at least one objective measure of OETD.

RESULTS

Six-hundred and fifty-two studies were identified in the initial literature search. Abstracts from 337 studies were screened, followed by full-text review of 61 studies, and qualitative synthesis of 12 studies. Tympanometry was used as an objective measure in ten studies. Eight of the 12 included studies had patient cohort selection bias. Eight studies administered the ETDQ-7 in cohorts of patients with or without OETD, already confirmed on tympanometry, and found a sensitivity of 91%-100% and specificity of 67%-100%. Four studies administered the ETDQ-7 to patients who had not previously undergone objective testing and found a sensitivity of 49%-80% and specificity of 24%-78%.

CONCLUSIONS

The ETDQ-7 is an important patient-reported outcome measure. However, based upon existing literature, the ETDQ-7 appears limited as a diagnostic tool for OETD or as an objective measure of Eustachian tube function.

Balloon dilation eustachian tuboplasty for dilatory dysfunction: Safety and efficacy analysis in an Australian cohort

BACKGROUND

Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) is a common clinical condition encountered by otolaryngologists. The severity and duration of symptoms range from the mild and transient to the chronic and severe along with secondary pathologies. Balloon dilation eustachian tuboplasty (BDET) as a treatment, was first described in 2010 and has been studied extensively. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of BDET in an Australian cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review on all patients who underwent BDET from September 2016 to March 2020 was performed. The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Patient Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) was chosen as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included subjective global assessment of presenting symptoms, ability to perform Valsalva maneuver and tympanometry. Any complications related to the procedures were reported.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen eustachian tube operations were included in this study. The patient cohort showed statistically significant improvement of mean EDTQ-7 score from 0.7 to 2.9. Improvement in EDTQ-7 was achieved in 83.9% of the cases. All patients in the baro-challenge-induced subgroup achieved improvement in ETDQ-7 score. Complete resolution of symptoms with an ETDQ <2.1 was achieved in 37.1% of the cohort. There were no adverse safety events associated with the procedures.

CONCLUSION

BDET resulted in improvement of the EDTQ-7 score in most of patients in this Australian cohort with no reported complications. BDET was most successful in baro-challenge-induced subgroup with universal improvement. Lower success rates were seen in patients with secondary pathology from their ETD.

Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty in Pediatric Patients: Is it Safe?

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this study is to demonstrate that balloon eustachian tuboplasty (BET) is safe and had limited complications in the pediatric patient population.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

This study analyzed the medical records of 43 consecutive encounters of patients under the age of 18 years old who underwent attempted BET. Charts of patients' postoperative appointments and appointments 30 days following the procedure were reviewed. Any complications that were reported by the surgeons' operative report or documented postoperatively were stratified by the Classification of Surgical Complications as outlined by the American College of Surgeons. Additional data points that were analyzed included concomitant surgical procedures, estimated blood loss, and demographic information.

RESULTS

A cohort of 43 pediatric patient encounters were investigated. There was a total of two complications from BET (4.7%) and one aborted case. The complications included epistaxis controlled with oxymetazoline and pressure, and vertigo that was later attributed to vestibular migraines. One case was aborted due to inadequate exposure. The average age of patients evaluated was 12.4 ± 3.2 years old with a range of 6.6 to 17.7 years old.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort, BET was demonstrated to be a relatively safe intervention with an overall complication rate of 4.7% in patients as young as 6.6 years old with recurrent or chronic eustachian tube dysfunction and/or related issues.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:1657-1662, 2021.

Subjective and Objective Effectiveness of Eustachian Tube Balloon Dilatation for Patients With Eustachian Tube Dysfunction-Evaluation in a Pressure Chamber

INTRODUCTION

The Eustachian tube plays a crucial role in pressure equalization between the middle ear and ambient pressure for fast and large pressure differences. In patients with chronic Eustachian tube dysfunction, Eustachian tube balloon dilatation is increasingly used as surgical therapy. Subjectively, many patients report an improvement of the symptoms postoperatively. Hence, there is a need to objectively measure this effect.

METHODS

The objectivity of Eustachian tube balloon dilatation was evaluated using a precise method of measuring Eustachian tube function. In a hypo/hyperbaric pressure chamber, 23 ears in 13 patients were exposed to a standardized profile of compression and decompression before Eustachian tube balloon dilatation and 4 weeks afterwards. Standardized parameters of Eustachian tube function were determined and statistically compared before and 4 weeks after intervention. In addition, an Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ7) questionnaire was completed beforehand and 4 weeks postoperatively to determine subjective surgical success.

RESULTS

The results from the ETDQ7 questionnaire showed a significant improvement in symptoms after Eustachian tube balloon dilatation (p = 0.0002). Objective measurements results showed a significant reduction of the Eustachian tube opening pressure during pressure decrease 4 weeks after intervention (p = 0.0012).

CONCLUSION

Eustachian tube balloon dilatation significantly reduced Eustachian tube opening pressure, in addition to subjective improvement of symptoms determined by ETDQ7.