One-stage clotting versus chromogenic assays for assessing recombinant factor VIII: two faces of a haemostasis coin

Selective human factor VIII activity measurement after analytical in-line purification

Background

It is essential to measure the activity of factor VIII (FVIII) throughout the life cycle of a coagulation FVIII concentrate. Such measurement in nonclinical pharmacokinetic studies is potentially biased by the presence of endogenous nonhuman FVIII, and certain manufacturing process-related additives can also impact the assay performance. Finally, the presence of FVIII activity-mimicking antibodies poses challenges when measuring FVIII in samples. Therefore, we developed an antibody-based chromogenic FVIII assay, which facilitates the selective and sensitive activity measurement of human FVIII in the presence of animal plasma and interfering agents.

Methods

Plate-bound monoclonal anti-FVIII antibody specifically captured human FVIII, which was then measured with a chromogenic activity assay. A human reference plasma preparation was used to construct the calibration curve. Spike recovery was carried out in a citrated cynomolgus monkey plasma-solvent/detergent mixture and in the presence of the bispecific antibody emicizumab.

Results

The calibration curve ranged from 3.03 to 97.0 mIU FVIII/ml and was obtained repeatedly with good accuracy. B domain-deleted and full-length FVIII did not differ in their responses. Recovery of spiked human FVIII in citrated cynomolgus monkey plasma was 102.7%, while neither native monkey plasma nor the other animal specimen tested showed any activity. Solvent/detergent solution and the bispecific antibody emicizumab had no influence on the assay.

Conclusion

Combining antibody-mediated specific capture of human FVIII and a chromogenic activity assay resulted in a selective and sensitive measurement of human FVIII with no interference by endogenous, nonhuman FVIII, manufacturing process additives, or an FVIII activity-mimicking antibody.

Gene therapy for hemophilias: the end of phenotypic testing or the start of a new era?

: Hemophilia comprises two distinct genetic disorders caused by missing or defective clotting factor VIII (hemophilia A) or clotting factor IX (hemophilia B). The management of these conditions has been for long based on replacement therapies, but emerging evidence garnered from recent landmark studies suggests that a promising avenue toward routine use of gene therapy is clearly progressing forward, thus generating unavoidable consequences on laboratory hemostasis, especially as pertaining to phenotypic testing. Although it seems likely that widespread use of gene therapy will be associated with a relative decrease of hemostasis tests requests in this patient population due to the relatively stable effect of transgene delivery and persistent production of endogenous clotting factor, some important aspects persuade us that conventional laboratory diagnostics, especially encompassing activated partial thromboplastin time, as well as one-stage and two-stage clotting factor assays, will not be completely voided in the gene therapy era. In particular, phenotypic testing will remain essential for excluding acquired or sporadic cases of hemophilia, for identifying and titrating factor inhibitors, as well as for defining and monitoring the long-term therapeutic effectiveness of gene transfection in hemophiliacs.

Clinical utility and impact of the use of the chromogenic vs one-stage factor activity assays in haemophilia A and B

Treatment of haemophilia A/B patients comprises factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) concentrate replacement therapy, respectively. FVIII and FIX activity levels can be measured in clinical laboratories using one‐stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)‐based clotting or two‐stage chromogenic factor activity assays. We discuss strengths and limitations of these assays, providing examples of clinical scenarios to highlight some of the challenges associated with their current use for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. Substantial inter‐laboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage assays when measuring the activity of factor replacement products due to the wide range of currently available aPTT reagents, calibration standards, factor‐deficient plasmas, assay conditions and instruments. Chromogenic activity assays may avoid some limitations associated with one‐stage assays, but their regulatory status, perceived higher cost, and lack of laboratory expertise may influence their use. Haemophilia management guidelines recommend the differential application of one or both assays for initial diagnosis and disease severity characterisation, post‐infusion monitoring and replacement factor potency labelling. Efficient communication between clinical and laboratory staff is crucial to ensure application of the most appropriate assay to each clinical situation, correct interpretation of assay results and, ultimately, accurate diagnosis and optimal and safe treatment of haemophilia A or B patients.

Postanalytical considerations that may improve the diagnosis or exclusion of haemophilia and von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) and haemophilia represent the most common inherited or acquired bleeding disorders. However, many laboratories and clinicians may be challenged by their accurate diagnosis or exclusion. Difficulties in diagnosis/exclusion may include analytical issues, where assays occasionally generate an incorrect result (ie representing an analytical error) or have limitations in their measurement range of and/or low analytical sensitivity. Also increasingly recognized is the influence of preanalytical issues on the diagnosis of VWD or haemophilia. Unfortunately, postanalytical considerations are often not well considered in the diagnostic process. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide an overview of some important postanalytical considerations that may help improve the diagnosis of VWD and haemophilia. This review primarily discusses aspects around reporting of test results. However, we also discuss other less well-recognized postanalytical considerations, including the use of assay ratios to help identify differential diagnoses and then guide further investigation.

An in silico and in vitro approach to elucidate the impact of residues flanking the cleavage scissile bonds of FVIII

Coagulation Factor VIII is activated by an ordered limited thrombin proteolysis with different catalytic efficiency at three P1 Arginine residues: Arg⁷⁵⁹> Arg¹⁷⁰⁸>Arg³⁹¹, indicating the flanking residues of the latter to be less optimal. This study aimed to investigate, in silico and in vitro, the impact of possessing hypothetically optimized residues at these three catalytic cleavage sites. The structural impact of the residues flanking Arginine cleavage sites was studied by in silico analysis through comparing the cleavage cleft of the native site with a hypothetically optimized sequence at each site. Moreover, recombinant FVIII proteins were prepared by replacing the sequences flanking native thrombin cleavage sites with the proposed cleavage-optimized sequence. FVIII specific activity was determined by assessing the FVIII activity levels in relation to FVIII antigen levels. We further investigated whether thrombin generation could reflect the haemostatic potential of the variants. Our in silico results show the impact of the residues directly in the cleavage bond, and their neighboring residues on the insertion efficiency of the loop into the thrombin cleavage cleft. Moreover, the in vitro analysis shows that the sequences flanking the Arg¹⁷⁰⁸ cleavage site seem to be the most close to optimal residues for achieving the maximal proteolytic activation and profactor activity of FVIII. The residues flanking the scissile bonds of FVIIII affect the cleavage rates and modulate the profactor activation. We were able to provide insights into the mechanisms of the specificity of thrombin for the P1 cleavage sites of FVIII. Thus, the P4-P2´ residues surrounding Arg¹⁷⁰⁸ of FVIII have the highest impact on rates of thrombin proteolysis which contributes to thrombin activation of the profactor and eventually to the thrombin generation potential.

Chromogenic Factor VIII Assays for Improved Diagnosis of Hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is an inherited bleeding disorder caused by a reduced level of factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) in blood. Bleeding episodes may occur spontaneously in the severe form of hemophilia or after trauma in the milder forms. It is important that patients are diagnosed correctly, which includes placing them into the correct severity category of the disorder so that appropriate treatment can be given. Diagnosis is made by determination of the amount of FVIII:C in the blood, usually using a one-stage factor VIII:C assay. However, approximately one third of patients with mild or moderate hemophilia will have much lower results by the chromogenic assay, with some of them having normal results by the one-stage assay. The chromogenic factor VIII assay is used in some specialized hemophilia reference centers and is recommended for the diagnosis of mild hemophilia A, as this assay is considered to better reflect the severity status of hemophilia patients than the one-stage assay.

A critical appraisal of one-stage and chromogenic assays of factor VIII activity

Accurate and precise potency determination by manufacturers of different types of factor VIII product (plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII [rFVIII]) is vital to clinicians and patients using FVIII concentrates. A separate, but related, requirement is ascertaining the FVIII activity levels in clinical samples for diagnosing and treating hemophilia A. The one-stage clotting assay (OSA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) are the main assays used for these measurements, with both assays being used for potency assignments, and the OSA also being widely used for clinical monitoring. Although the assays can produce concordant results, discrepancies often occur, e.g. when measuring FVIII levels in patients with mild or moderate hemophilia A, or when assaying high-purity FVIII products. Modifications to rFVIII proteins, such as B-domain deletion (BDD), and technologies for improving the pharmacokinetic profile of rFVIII may exacerbate assay discrepancies. The CSA appears to be essentially unaffected by these modifications. However, the OSA underestimates the FVIII activity levels and therapeutic potential of some further modified BDD rFVIII products, especially those conjugated to poly(ethylene glycol); the extent of the effects is dependent on the specific OSA reagents used. Although the OSA remains the preferred choice for clinical monitoring in Europe and the USA, an awareness of the limitations of that assay has prompted more laboratories to adopt the CSA.

Methods of coagulation

The investigation of haemostasis is aimed to replicate normal blood coagulation in the laboratory. There are a number of different methods employed including clot-based coagulation tests, chromogenic assays, immunological tests, and aggregation studies. Today automated machines are designed to be able to perform a number of different methodologies. To guarantee the results produced by a laboratory are reliable and accurate, laboratories need to follow international standards and guidelines and use established methodologies. The laboratory needs a quality management plan, to perform internal quality control and participate in an external quality assurance program.

Mild hemophilia A

Mild hemophilia A (HA), defined by clinical features and factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) between 0.05 and 0.40 IU mL(-1), is characteristically distinct from severe HA. Indeed, although the molecular characterization of mild HA has permitted the identification of specific underlying mutations, its clinical phenotype is strikingly different from that of patients with a severe FVIII defect, where spontaneous hemorrhages or recurrent joint bleeding are usual manifestations. With aging, mild HA patients may develop complications (i.e. cancers and cardiovascular disorders), the management of which may prove challenging due to the concomitant bleeding tendency. Furthermore, the development of inhibitors provides an additional major complication in these patients, because it increases the severity of the bleeding phenotype and complicates their management. Standard management of mild HA includes the use of desmopressin and antifibrinolytic agents for minor bleeding episodes or surgical procedures, whilst major bleeding or surgery requires replacement therapy with FVIII concentrates. As regards treatment of patients with inhibitors, bypassing agents (i.e. activated prothrombin complex concentrates and recombinant activated FVII) have proven effective in the treatment of bleeding episodes, but as there are insufficient data to determine the optimal approach to immune tolerance induction in this group of patients, their optimal management remains controversial. Rituximab is a newer, promising therapeutic option for inhibitor eradication in such patients. Many aspects concerning mild HA remain to be clarified, including the molecular basis, the natural history and the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Only large prospective studies will shed light on this condition.