Diagnosis of nonventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia: how much do we know?

Clinical challenge of diagnosing non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia and identifying causative pathogens: a narrative review

Non-ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) is associated with a significant healthcare burden, arising from high incidence and associated morbidity and mortality. However, accurate identification of cases remains challenging. At present, there is no gold-standard test for the diagnosis of NV-HAP, requiring instead the blending of non-specific signs and investigations. Causative organisms are only identified in a minority of cases. This has significant implications for surveillance, patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship. Much of the existing research in HAP has been conducted among ventilated patients. The paucity of dedicated NV-HAP research means that conclusions regarding diagnostic methods, pathology and interventions must largely be extrapolated from work in other settings. Progress is also limited by the lack of a widely agreed definition for NV-HAP. The diagnosis of NV-HAP has large scope for improvement. Consensus regarding a case definition will allow meaningful research to improve understanding of its aetiology and the heterogeneity of outcomes experienced by patients. There is potential to optimize the role of imaging and to incorporate novel techniques to identify likely causative pathogens. This would facilitate both antimicrobial stewardship and surveillance of an important healthcare-associated infection. This narrative review considers the utility of existing methods to diagnose NV-HAP, with a focus on the significance and challenge of identifying pathogens. It discusses the limitations in current techniques, and explores the potential of emergent molecular techniques to improve microbiological diagnosis and outcomes for patients.

An Observational Study to Develop a Predictive Model for Bacterial Pneumonia Diagnosis in Severe COVID-19 Patients-C19-PNEUMOSCORE

In COVID-19 patients, antibiotics overuse is still an issue. A predictive scoring model for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia at intensive care unit (ICU) admission would be a useful stewardship tool. We performed a multicenter observational study including 331 COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation at ICU admission; 179 patients with bacterial pneumonia; and 152 displaying negative lower-respiratory samplings. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to identify predictors of pulmonary co-infections, and a composite risk score was developed using β-coefficients. We identified seven variables as predictors of bacterial pneumonia: vaccination status (OR 7.01; 95% CI, 1.73-28.39); chronic kidney disease (OR 3.16; 95% CI, 1.15-8.71); pre-ICU hospital length of stay ≥ 5 days (OR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.11-3.4); neutrophils ≥ 9.41 × 10⁹/L (OR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.16-3.30); procalcitonin ≥ 0.2 ng/mL (OR 5.09; 95% CI, 2.93-8.84); C-reactive protein ≥ 107.6 mg/L (OR 1.99; 95% CI, 1.15-3.46); and Brixia chest X-ray score ≥ 9 (OR 2.03; 95% CI, 1.19-3.45). A predictive score (C19-PNEUMOSCORE), ranging from 0 to 9, was obtained by assigning one point to each variable, except from procalcitonin and vaccine status, which gained two points each. At a cut-off of ≥3, the model exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 84.9%, 55.9%, 69.4%, 75.9%, and 71.6%, respectively. C19-PNEUMOSCORE may be an easy-to-use bedside composite tool for the early identification of severe COVID-19 patients with pulmonary bacterial co-infection at ICU admission. Its implementation may help clinicians to optimize antibiotics administration in this setting.

Microbiology and Clinical Outcome of Hospital-Acquired Respiratory Infections in an Italian Teaching Hospital: A Retrospective Study

The burden, microbial etiology and clinical impact of hospital-acquired respiratory infections (HARIs) were determined at an Italian teaching hospital over a 12-month period. For this purpose, overall ordinary hospitalizations ≥ 2 days of subjects over 18 years old with discharge from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 were examined by cross-referencing demographic and clinical data from hospital discharge forms with microbiological data from the computer system of the Microbiology Unit. We identified 329 individuals with HARIs (96 females and 233 males; median age 70 years, range 18−93), who represented ¼ of the total hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) in the period. The inpatient setting was medical and surgical in similar proportions (169 vs. 160, respectively) and the mean hospital stay was 38.9 ± 33.6 days. One hundred and forty patients (42.6% of the total sample) were suffering from one or more chronic diseases. A total of 581 microorganisms (82 antibiotic-resistant and 499 non-resistant) were detected in HARI patients. The most common isolated species were Staphylococcus aureus (16.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (13.3%), Pseudomonas spp. (12.6%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (10.5%), followed by Enterobacter spp. (5.3%), Escherichia coli (5.2%) and Enterococcus spp. (4.8%). One hundred and sixty-seven individuals (49.0% of the total) had polymicrobial infections. One hundred thirty-one patients (39.8% of the total) underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation and 62.6% of them died, compared to 17.7% of the non-intubated patients. Multivariable analysis confirmed a positive correlation between death and increased age (p = 0.05), surgical MDC (p = 0.007), number of microorganisms over the sample mean (p = 0.001), the presence of chronic diseases (p = 0.046), and intubation and mechanical ventilation (p < 0.0001). A positive correlation between intubation and antibiotic-resistant organisms (p = 0.003) was also found. HARIs are still a major public health problem and require constant surveillance due to their severe clinical outcome.

Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

Pneumonia acquired during hospitalization is called nosocomial pneumonia (NP). Nosocomial pneumonia is divided into two types. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) refers to hospital-acquired pneumonia, whereas ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) refers to ventilator-associated pneumonia. Most clinical literature stresses VAP’s importance and associated mortality and morbidity, whereas HAP is not given enough attention even while being the most common cause of NP. HAP, like VAP, carries a high mortality and morbidity. HAP is the commonest cause of mortality from hospital-acquired infections. HAP is a common determinant for intensive care unit (ICU) admits with respiratory failure. Recent research has identified definite risk factors responsible for HAP. If these are prevented or modified, the HAP incidence can be significantly decreased with improved clinical outcomes and lesser utilization of the health care resources. The prevention approach will need multiple strategies to address the issues. Precise epidemiological data on HAP is deficient due to limitations of the commonly used diagnostic measures. The diagnostic modalities available in HAP are less invasive than VAP. Recent infectious disease society guidelines have stressed the importance of HAP by removing healthcare-associated pneumonia as a diagnosis. Specific differences exist between HAP and VAP, which are gleaned over in this chapter.

Diagnostic accuracy of Gram staining when predicting staphylococcal hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no clear guidance on empirical antibiotic coverage against Staphylococcus aureus for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the presence of clusters of Gram-positive cocci in Gram staining of respiratory samples predicts S. aureus as HAP/VAP pathogen.

METHODS

Data sources were MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Scielo, CINAHL and Scopus, from inception to 15/07/2017 (update on 31/10/2019), and original data from a single-centre database (PROSPERO: CRD42017072138). We included studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of a Gram-staining evaluation suggestive of Staphylococcus compared with a positive culture for S. aureus in any type of lower respiratory tract sample. Participants were adult patients with HAP/VAP. The index test was morphological evaluation of Gram staining of respiratory samples. We followed PRISMA guidelines and assessed risk of bias and applicability with the QUADAS-2 tool. We conducted a meta-analysis using a bivariate random effects model.

RESULTS

We selected five studies that included only VAP and data from a single-centre database including VAP and HAP. We pooled six studies for VAP and analysed 1665 respiratory samples. Pooled sensitivity was 68% (95%CI 49-83 and specificity 95% (95%CI 86-98). The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 12.7 (95%CI 5.1-31.6), negative likelihood ratio 0.34 (95%CI 0.20-0.57), diagnostic odds ratio 38 (95%CI 13-106) and area under the summary receiver operating curve (SROC) 0.91 (95%CI 0.88-0.93). There was great heterogeneity between sensitivity and specificity. In scenarios in which the prevalence of S. aureus was between 5% and 20%, the positive and negative predictive values were 62% (95%CI 47-77) and 95% (95%CI 82-100), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of Gram-positive cocci in clusters in respiratory samples of patients with VAP has the potential to guide risk assessments of S. aureus for more personalized antibiotic coverage. Randomized clinical trials with patient-centred outcomes are needed for strong clinical recommendations.

Is ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia a worse entity than ventilator-associated pneumonia?

Introduction

Nosocomial pneumonia develops after ≥48 h of hospitalisation and is classified as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP); the latter may require mechanical ventilation (V-HAP) or not (NV-HAP).

Main findings

VAP and HAP affect a significant proportion of hospitalised patients and are characterised by poor clinical outcomes. Among them, V-HAP has the greatest 28-day mortality rate followed by VAP and NV-HAP (27.8% versus 18% versus 14.5%, respectively). However, no differences in terms of pathophysiology, underlying microbiological pathways and subsequent therapy have been identified. International guidelines suggest specific flow charts to help clinicians in the therapeutic management of such diseases; however, there are no specific recommendations beyond VAP and HAP classification. HAP subtypes are scarcely considered as different entities and the lack of data from the clinical scenario limits any final conclusion. Hopefully, recent understanding of the pathophysiology of such diseases, as well as the discovery of new therapies, will improve the outcome associated with such pulmonary infections.

Conclusion

Nosocomial pneumonia is a multifaced disease with features of pivotal interest in critical care medicine. Due to the worrisome data on mortality of patients with nosocomial pneumonia, further prospective studies focused on this topic are urgently needed.

Due to the different mortality of each subtype of nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation, new prospective studies are urgently neededhttps://bit.ly/3fFoZ6U

Non-ventilator health care-associated pneumonia (NV-HAP): Pathogenesis and microbiology of NV-HAP

Studies demonstrate that those at risk for developing nonventilator associated pneumonia (NV-HAP) include the very young and the very old, as well as persons with compromised immune systems cardiovascular and/or pulmonary disease. This section includes a review of the pathogenesis and microbiology of NV-HAP, including bacterial as well as viral and fungal pathogens. Etiology, modes of transmission, and specific prevention strategies associated with various causative microorganisms are highlighted.

Nosocomial Infections and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Cancer Patients

Nosocomial infections or healthcare-acquired infections are a common cause of increased morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Cancer patients are at an increased risk for these infections due to their immunosuppressed states. Considering these adverse effects on and the socioeconomic burden, efforts should be made to minimize the transmission of these infections and make the hospitals a safer environment. These infection rates can be significantly reduced by the implementing and improving compliance with the “care bundles.”

This chapter will address the common nosocomial infections such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and surgical site infections (SSI), including preventive strategies and care bundles for the same.

Invasive and non-invasive diagnostic approaches for microbiological diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia

Background

Data on the methods used for microbiological diagnosis of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) are mainly extrapolated from ventilator-associated pneumonia. HAP poses additional challenges for respiratory sampling, and the utility of sputum or distal sampling in HAP has not been comprehensively evaluated, particularly in HAP admitted to the ICU.

Methods

We analyzed 200 patients with HAP from six ICUs in a teaching hospital in Barcelona, Spain. The respiratory sampling methods used were divided into non-invasive [sputum and endotracheal aspirate (EAT)] and invasive [fiberoptic-bronchoscopy aspirate (FBAS), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)].

Results

A median of three diagnostic methods were applied [range 2–4]. At least one respiratory sampling method was applied in 93% of patients, and two or more were applied in 40%. Microbiological diagnosis was achieved in 99 (50%) patients, 69 (70%) by only one method (42% FBAS, 23% EAT, 15% sputum, 9% BAL, 7% blood culture, and 4% urinary antigen). Seventy-eight (39%) patients underwent a fiberoptic-bronchoscopy when not receiving mechanical ventilation. Higher rates of microbiological diagnosis were observed in the invasive group (56 vs. 39%, p = 0.018). Patients with microbiological diagnosis more frequently presented changes in their empirical antibiotic scheme, mainly de-escalation.

Conclusions

A comprehensive approach might be undertaken for microbiological diagnosis in critically ill nonventilated HAP. Sputum sampling determined one third of microbiological diagnosis in HAP patients who were not subsequently intubated. Invasive methods were associated with higher rates of microbiological diagnosis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2348-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.