1
|
Cuenca JA, Nates JL, Laserna A, Heatter AJ, Manjappachar N, Martin P, Reyes MP, Hernandez M, Hall J, Ramirez CM, de Villalobos DH. Long-Term Survival of Patients With Cancer, Sepsis, and Vasopressor Requirements Based on Lactate Levels. Crit Care Explor 2024; 6:e1070. [PMID: 38572448 PMCID: PMC10990307 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000001070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
A prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the 1-year survival of cancer patients with sepsis and vasopressor requirements. Eligible patients were admitted a Comprehensive Cancer Center's ICU and were compared based on their admission lactate levels. Of the 132 included patients, 87 (66%) had high lactate (HL; > 2.0 mmol/L), and 45 (34%) had normal lactate (NL; ≤ 2.0 mmol/L). The 1-year survival rates of the two groups were similar (HL 16% vs. NL 18%; p = 0.0921). After adjustment for ICU baseline characteristics, HL was not significantly associated with a 1-year survival (Hazards ratio, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.94-2.05). Critically ill cancer patients with sepsis and vasopressor requirements, regardless of the lactate level, had 1-year survival of less than 20%. Large multicenter cancer registries would enable to confirm our findings and better understand the long-term trajectories of sepsis in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Internal Medicine residency, Texas Institute of Graduate Medical Education and Research (TIGMER), University of Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Andres Laserna
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Alba J Heatter
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nirmala Manjappachar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Peyton Martin
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maria P Reyes
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mike Hernandez
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jacob Hall
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Claudia M Ramirez
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Diego H de Villalobos
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nates JL, Pastores SM, Oropello JM. The authors reply. Crit Care Med 2023; 51:e276-e277. [PMID: 37971346 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L Nates
- Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Stephen M Pastores
- Critical Care Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - John M Oropello
- Critical Care Department, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Balasubramanian P, Isha S, Hanson AJ, Jenkins A, Satashia P, Balavenkataraman A, Huespe IA, Bansal V, Caples SM, Khan SA, Jain NK, Kashyap R, Cartin-Ceba R, Nates JL, Reddy DRS, Milian RD, Farres H, Martin AK, Patel PC, Smith MA, Shapiro AB, Bhattacharyya A, Chaudhary S, Kiley SP, Quinones QJ, Patel NM, Guru PK, Moreno Franco P, Sanghavi DK. Association of plasma volume status with outcomes in hospitalized Covid-19 ARDS patients: A retrospective multicenter observational study. J Crit Care 2023; 78:154378. [PMID: 37479551 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the association of estimated plasma volume (ePV) and plasma volume status (PVS) on admission with the outcomes in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective multi-center study on COVID-19-related ARDS patients who were admitted to the Mayo Clinic Enterprise health system. Plasma volume was calculated using the formulae for ePV and PVS, and these variables were analyzed for correlation with patient outcomes. RESULTS Our analysis included 1298 patients with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) respiratory score ≥ 2 (PaO2/FIO2 ≤300 mmHg) and a mortality rate of 25.96%. A Cox proportional multivariate analysis showed PVS but not ePV as an independent correlation with 90-day mortality after adjusting for the covariates (HR: 1.015, 95% CI: 1.005-1.025, p = 0.002 and HR 1.054, 95% CI 0.958-1.159, p = 0.278 respectively). CONCLUSION A lower PVS on admission correlated with a greater chance of survival in COVID-19-related ARDS patients. The role of PVS in guiding fluid management should be investigated in future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prasanth Balasubramanian
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Shahin Isha
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Abby J Hanson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Anna Jenkins
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America; Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Parthkumar Satashia
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Arvind Balavenkataraman
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Iván A Huespe
- Critical Care Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Vikas Bansal
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Sean M Caples
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Syed Anjum Khan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System in Mankato, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Nitesh K Jain
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System in Mankato, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Rahul Kashyap
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Dereddi R S Reddy
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ricardo Diaz Milian
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Houssam Farres
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Archer K Martin
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Parag C Patel
- Department of Transplantation, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Michael A Smith
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Anna B Shapiro
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Anirban Bhattacharyya
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Sanjay Chaudhary
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Sean P Kiley
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Quintin J Quinones
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Neal M Patel
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Pramod K Guru
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Pablo Moreno Franco
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America
| | - Devang K Sanghavi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nates JL, Oropello JM, Badjatia N, Beilman G, Coopersmith CM, Halpern NA, Herr DL, Jacobi J, Kahn R, Leung S, Puri N, Sen A, Pastores SM. Flow-Sizing Critical Care Resources. Crit Care Med 2023; 51:1552-1565. [PMID: 37486677 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the factors affecting critical care capacity and how critical care organizations (CCOs) within academic centers in the U.S. flow-size critical care resources under normal operations, strain, and surge conditions. DATA SOURCES PubMed, federal agency and American Hospital Association reports, and previous CCO survey results were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION Studies and reports of critical care bed capacity and utilization within CCOs and in the United States were selected. DATA EXTRACTION The Academic Leaders in the Critical Care Medicine Task Force established regular conference calls to reach a consensus on the approach of CCOs to "flow-sizing" critical care services. DATA SYNTHESIS The approach of CCOs to "flow-sizing" critical care is outlined. The vertical (relation to institutional resources, e.g., space allocation, equipment, personnel redistribution) and horizontal (interdepartmental, e.g., emergency department, operating room, inpatient floors) integration of critical care delivery (ICUs, rapid response) for healthcare organizations and the methods by which CCOs flow-size critical care during normal operations, strain, and surge conditions are described. The advantages, barriers, and recommendations for the rapid and efficient scaling of critical care operations via a CCO structure are explained. Comprehensive guidance and resources for the development of "flow-sizing" capability by a CCO within a healthcare organization are provided. CONCLUSIONS We identified and summarized the fundamental principles affecting critical care capacity. The taskforce highlighted the advantages of the CCO governance model to achieve rapid and cost-effective "flow-sizing" of critical care services and provide recommendations and resources to facilitate this capability. The relevance of a comprehensive approach to "flow-sizing" has become particularly relevant in the wake of the latest COVID-19 pandemic. In light of the growing risks of another extreme epidemic, planning for adequate capacity to confront the next critical care crisis is urgent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L Nates
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nitin Puri
- Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cuenca JA, Hanmandlu A, Wegner R, Botdorf J, Tummala S, Iliescu CA, Nates JL, Reddy DR. Management of respiratory failure in immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced overlap syndrome: a case series and review of the literature. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:310. [PMID: 37700240 PMCID: PMC10496364 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02257-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Checkpoint inhibitor-induced overlap syndrome ([OS] myocarditis, and myositis with or without myasthenia gravis) is rare but life-threatening. CASES PRESENTATION Here we present a case series of four cancer patients that developed OS. High troponinemia raised the concern for myocarditis in all the cases. However, the predominant clinical feature differed among the cases. Two patients showed marked myocarditis with a shorter hospital stay. The other two patients had a prolonged ICU stay due to severe neuromuscular involvement secondary to myositis and myasthenia gravis. Treatment was based on steroids, plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, and immunosuppressive biological agents. CONCLUSION The management of respiratory failure is challenging, particularly in those patients with predominant MG. Along with intensive clinical monitoring, bedside respiratory mechanics can guide the decision-making process of selecting a respiratory support method, the timing of elective intubation and extubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Ankit Hanmandlu
- McGovern School of Medicine, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Wegner
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Joshua Botdorf
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sudhakar Tummala
- Department of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cezar A Iliescu
- Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dereddi R Reddy
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cuenca JA, Casal RF, Ahrar K, Nates JL. Where did the line go? A case of a duplicated left superior vena cava. Oxf Med Case Reports 2023; 2023:omad035. [PMID: 37377723 PMCID: PMC10292635 DOI: 10.1093/omcr/omad035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roberto F Casal
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kamran Ahrar
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Correspondence address. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Unit 112, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA. Tel: 713-792-5040; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reddy DR, Cuenca JA, Botdorf J, Muthu M, Hanmandlu A, Wegner R, Crommett J, Gutierrez C, Rathi N, Sajith B, Knafl M, Abbas HA, Woodman SE, Nates JL. Clinical Characteristics and Cause of Death Among Hospitalized Decedents With Cancer and COVID-19. Mayo Clin Proc 2023; 98:451-457. [PMID: 36868753 PMCID: PMC9794478 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
There is scant information on the clinical progression, end-of-life decisions, and cause of death of patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19. Therefore, we conducted a case series of patients admitted to a comprehensive cancer center who did not survive their hospitalization. To determine the cause of death, 3 board-certified intensivists reviewed the electronic medical records. Concordance regarding cause of death was calculated. Discrepancies were resolved through a joint case-by-case review and discussion among the 3 reviewers. During the study period, 551 patients with cancer and COVID-19 were admitted to a dedicated specialty unit; among them, 61 (11.6%) were nonsurvivors. Among nonsurvivors, 31 (51%) patients had hematologic cancers, and 29 (48%) had undergone cancer-directed chemotherapy within 3 months before admission. The median time to death was 15 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8 to 18.2). There were no differences in time to death by cancer category or cancer treatment intent. The majority of decedents (84%) had full code status at admission; however, 53 (87%) had do-not-resuscitate orders at the time of death. Most deaths were deemed to be COVID-19 related (88.5%). The concordance between the reviewers for the cause of death was 78.7%. In contrast to the belief that COVID-19 decedents die because of their comorbidities, in our study only 1 of every 10 patients died of cancer-related causes. Full-scale interventions were offered to all patients irrespective of oncologic treatment intent. However, most decedents in this population preferred care with nonresuscitative measures rather than full support at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dereddi Raja Reddy
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joshua Botdorf
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mayoora Muthu
- Department of Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ankit Hanmandlu
- McGovern School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robert Wegner
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John Crommett
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Cristina Gutierrez
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nisha Rathi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bilja Sajith
- Acute Care Services, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mark Knafl
- Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hussein A Abbas
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Genomics Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Data-Driven Determinants for COVID-19 Oncology Discovery Effort (D3CODE) Team, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cuenca JA, Manjappachar N, Nates J, Mundie T, Beil L, Christensen E, Martin P, Diaz N, Layton LS, Plexman K, Nates JL, Price KJ, Idowu O. Humanizing the intensive care unit experience in a comprehensive cancer center: A patient- and family-centered improvement study. Palliat Support Care 2022; 20:794-800. [PMID: 36942585 PMCID: PMC10030873 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951521001838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Improving family-centered outcomes is a priority in oncologic critical care. As part of the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Collaborative, we implemented patient- and family-centered initiatives in a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS A multidisciplinary team was created to implement the initiatives. We instituted an open visitation policy (OVP) that revamped the use of the two-way communication boards and enhanced the waiting room experience by hosting ICU family-centered events. To assess the initiatives' effects, we carried out pre-intervention (PRE) and post-intervention (POST) family/caregiver and ICU practitioner surveys. RESULTS A total of 159 (PRE = 79, POST = 80) family members and 147 (PRE = 95, POST = 52) ICU practitioners participated. Regarding the decision-making process, family members felt more included (40.5% vs. 68.8%, p < 0.001) and more supported (29.1% vs. 48.8%, p = 0.011) after the implementation of the initiatives. The caregivers also felt more control over the decision-making process in the POST survey (34.2% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.005). Although 33% of the ICU staff considered OVP was beneficial for the ICU, 41% disagreed and 26% were neutral. Only half of them responded that OVP was beneficial for patients and 63% agreed that OVP was beneficial for families. Half of the practitioners agreed that OVP resulted in additional work for staff. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS Our project effectively promoted patient- and family-centered care. The families expressed satisfaction with the communication of information and the decision-making process. However, the ICU staff felt that the initiatives increased their work load. Further research is needed to understand whether making this project universal or introducing additional novel practices would significantly benefit patients admitted to the ICU and their family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nirmala Manjappachar
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joel Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tiffany Mundie
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lisa Beil
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eric Christensen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Peyton Martin
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nancy Diaz
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lorraine S Layton
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Karen Plexman
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kristen J Price
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Olakunle Idowu
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cuenca JA, Manjappachar NK, Ramírez CM, Hernandez M, Martin P, Gutierrez C, Rathi N, Sprung CL, Price KJ, Nates JL. Outcomes and Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Solid Tumors and Septic Shock Defined by Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock Criteria. Chest 2022; 162:1063-1073. [PMID: 35644244 PMCID: PMC9808606 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data assessing outcomes of patients with solid tumors demonstrating septic shock using the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock are scarce. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the independent predictors of 28-day mortality in critically ill adults with solid tumors and septic shock? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Cohort of solid tumor patients admitted to the ICU with septic shock. Demographic and clinical characteristics were gathered from the electronic health records. We developed a reduced multivariate logistics regression model to identify independent predictors of 28-day mortality and used Kaplan-Meier plots to assess survival. RESULTS A total of 271 patients were included. The median age was 62 years (range, 19-94 years); 57.2% were men and 53.5% were White. The most common underlying malignancies were lung (19.2%), breast (7.7%), pancreatic (7.7%), and colorectal (7.4%) cancers. Most patients (84.5%) harbored metastatic disease. Twenty-eight days after ICU admission, 188 patients (69.4%) had died. Nonsurvivors showed a higher rate of advanced cancer, longer hospital stays before ICU admission, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores at admission and throughout the ICU stay (P < .001 for all). The multivariate analysis identified metastatic disease (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.43-7.03), respiratory failure (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.15-4.74), elevated lactate levels (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.90-5.36), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores of 3 or 4 (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.33-5.57) as independent predictors of 28-day mortality. Only 38 patients (14%) were discharged home without medical assistance. INTERPRETATION The 28-day mortality rate of patients with solid tumors and septic shock was considerably high. Factors associated with worse survival included advanced oncologic disease, poor performance status, high lactate level, and concomitant acute respiratory failure. Early goals-of-care discussions should be considered for frail patients with septic shock and advanced metastatic disease without denying access to the appropriate level of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Cuenca
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nirmala K Manjappachar
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Claudia M Ramírez
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mike Hernandez
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Peyton Martin
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Cristina Gutierrez
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nisha Rathi
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Charles L Sprung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kristen J Price
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nazer L, Lopez-Olivo MA, Cuenca JA, Awad W, Brown AR, Abusara A, Sirimaturos M, Hicklen RS, Nates JL. All-cause mortality in cancer patients treated for sepsis in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:10099-10109. [PMID: 36214879 PMCID: PMC9549043 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07392-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Sepsis is a common complication in patients with cancer, but studies evaluating the outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with sepsis on a global scale are limited. We aimed to summarize the existing evidence on mortality rates in this patient population. Methods Prospective and retrospective observational studies evaluating critically ill adult cancer patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and/or septic shock were included. Studies published from January 2010 to September 2021 that reported at least one mortality outcome were retrieved from MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane databases. Study selection, bias assessment, and data collection were performed independently by two reviewers, and any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. We calculated pooled intensive care unit (ICU), hospital, and 28/30-day mortality rates. The heterogeneity of the data was tested using the chi-square test, with a P value < 0.10 indicating significant heterogeneity. Results A total of 5464 citations were reviewed, of which 10 studies met the inclusion criteria; these studies included 6605 patients. All studies had a Newcastle–Ottawa scale score of 7 or higher. The mean patient age ranged from 51.4 to 64.9 years. The pooled ICU, hospital, and 28/30 day mortality rates were 48% (95% CI, 43– 53%; I2 = 80.6%), 62% (95% CI, 58–67%; I2 = 0%), and 50% (95% CI, 38– 62%; I2 = 98%), respectively. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed. Conclusion Critically ill cancer patients with sepsis had poor survival, with a hospital mortality rate of about two-thirds. The substantial observed heterogeneity among studies could be attributed to variability in the criteria used to define sepsis as well as variability in treatment, the severity of illness, and care across settings. Our results are a call to action to identify strategies that improve outcomes for cancer patients with sepsis. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07392-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lama Nazer
- Department of Pharmacy, King Hussein Cancer Center, Queen Rania Al-Abdallah StreetPO Box 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan.
| | - Maria A Lopez-Olivo
- Department of Health Services Research, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wedad Awad
- Department of Pharmacy, King Hussein Cancer Center, Queen Rania Al-Abdallah StreetPO Box 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | - Anne Rain Brown
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aseel Abusara
- Department of Pharmacy, King Hussein Cancer Center, Queen Rania Al-Abdallah StreetPO Box 1269, Amman, 11941, Jordan
| | | | - Rachel S Hicklen
- Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Peiris S, Nates JL, Toledo J, Ho YL, Sosa O, Stanford V, Aldighieri S, Reveiz L. Hospital readmissions and emergency department re-presentation of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2022; 46:e142. [PMID: 36245904 PMCID: PMC9553017 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2022.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective.
To characterize the frequency, causes, and predictors of readmissions of COVID-19 patients after discharge from heath facilities or emergency departments, interventions used to reduce readmissions, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients discharged from such settings.
Methods.
We performed a systematic review for case series and observational studies published between January 2020 and April 2021 in PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and MedRxiv, reporting the frequency, causes, or risk factors for readmission of COVID-19 survivors/patients. We conducted a narrative synthesis and assessed the methodological quality using the JBI critical appraisal checklist.
Results.
We identified 44 studies including data from 10 countries. The overall 30-day median readmission rate was 7.1%. Readmissions varied with the length of follow-up, occurring <10.5%, <14.5%, <21.5%, and <30%, respectively, for 10, 30, 60, and 253 days following discharge. Among those followed up for 30 and 60 days, the median time from discharge to readmission was 3 days and 8–11 days, respectively. The significant risk factor associated with readmission was having shorter length of stay, and the important causes included respiratory or thromboembolic events and chronic illnesses. Emergency department re-presentation was >20% in four studies. Risk factors associated with mortality were male gender, advanced age, and comorbidities.
Conclusions.
Readmission of COVID-19 survivors is frequent, and post-discharge mortality is significant in specific populations. There is an urgent need to further examine underlying reasons for early readmission and to prevent additional readmissions and adverse outcomes in COVID-19 survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sasha Peiris
- Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | | | - Joao Toledo
- Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Yeh-Li Ho
- Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ojino Sosa
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Victoria Stanford
- Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Sylvain Aldighieri
- Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| | - Ludovic Reveiz
- Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Reyes MP, Cuenca JA, Heatter J, Martin PR, Villalobos DHD, Nates JL. Tribulations of conducting critically ill cancer patients research: Lessons from a failed septic shock trial and Murphy's law. Med Intensiva 2022; 46:582-585. [PMID: 36155682 DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2021.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- M P Reyes
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Heatter
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P R Martin
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D H D Villalobos
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Urso C, Laserna A, Feng L, Agnite A, Jawe N, Magoun C, Layton LS, Nates JL, Gutierrez C. Mindfulness as an Antidote to Burnout for Nursing and Support Staff in an Oncological Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study. Holist Nurs Pract 2022; 36:E38-E47. [PMID: 35981118 PMCID: PMC9395129 DOI: 10.1097/hnp.0000000000000544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
We set out to implement a pilot mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) to alleviate burnout, stress, anxiety, and depression in nursing and support staff of an oncological intensive care unit. We created an 8-week personalized yoga therapy MBI for nurses and patient care technicians in an oncological intensive care unit. Validated self-report scale tools were used to measure burnout, stress, anxiety, and depression in the intervention and control groups (Institutional Quality Improvement Registry no. 296, 2018). Changes in scores from baseline to postintervention were evaluated between groups. Forty-five staff, 21 in the control group and 24 in the intervention group, participated. Both groups at baseline had low prevalence of stress, anxiety, and depression (13% vs 36.8%, P = .11; 21.7% vs 52.6%, P = .17; 17.4% vs 26.3%, P = .48; respectively). Low rates of high emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low professional efficacy were observed for both groups (41.7% vs 35.0%, P = .65; 20.8% vs 15%, P = .71; 58.3% vs 50.0%, P = .58, respectively). Post-MBI, prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization remained low and similar between both groups. Notwithstanding, professional efficacy scores significantly improved in a between-group comparison (0.063 vs -0.25; P = .0336). We observed that burnout, stress, anxiety, and depression were remarkably low in our study relative to the literature. Implementation of the MBI faced many obstacles and had low compliance during participation. This presumably influenced results and should be addressed prior to any future intervention. Despite this, professional efficacy improved significantly. TRIAL REGISTRATION Approved by MD Anderson Cancer Center Quality Improvement Registry (no. 296, 2018).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Urso
- Departments of Critical Care and Palliative, Rehabilitation & Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Ms Urso); Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Drs Laserna, Nates, and Gutierrez); Department of Statistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Mr Feng); Limitless Yoga Project, Houston, Texas (Ms Agnite); Clinical Quality Improvement Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Ms Jawe); Surgical and Medical Intensive Care Units, Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Mss Magoun and Layton); and Surgical and Medical Intensive Care Units, and Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Nates)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mentzelopoulos SD, Chen S, Nates JL, Kruser JM, Hartog C, Michalsen A, Efstathiou N, Joynt GM, Lobo S, Avidan A, Sprung CL. Derivation and performance of an end-of-life practice score aimed at interpreting worldwide treatment-limiting decisions in the critically ill. Crit Care 2022; 26:106. [PMID: 35418103 PMCID: PMC9009016 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-022-03971-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Limitations of life-sustaining interventions in intensive care units (ICUs) exhibit substantial changes over time, and large, contemporary variation across world regions. We sought to determine whether a weighted end-of-life practice score can explain a large, contemporary, worldwide variation in limitation decisions.
Methods The 2015–2016 (Ethicus-2) vs. 1999–2000 (Ethicus-1) comparison study was a two-period, prospective observational study assessing the frequency of limitation decisions in 4952 patients from 22 European ICUs. The worldwide Ethicus-2 study was a single-period prospective observational study assessing the frequency of limitation decisions in 12,200 patients from 199 ICUs situated in 8 world regions. Binary end-of-life practice variable data (1 = presence; 0 = absence) were collected post hoc (comparison study, 22/22 ICUs, n = 4592; worldwide study, 186/199 ICUs, n = 11,574) for family meetings, daily deliberation for appropriate level of care, end-of-life discussions during weekly meetings, written triggers for limitations, written ICU end-of-life guidelines and protocols, palliative care and ethics consultations, ICU-staff taking communication or bioethics courses, and national end-of-life guidelines and legislation. Regarding the comparison study, generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis was used to determine associations between the 12 end-of-life practice variables and treatment limitations. The weighted end-of-life practice score was then calculated using GEE-derived coefficients of the end-of-life practice variables. Subsequently, the weighted end-of-life practice score was validated in GEE analysis using the worldwide study dataset. Results In comparison study GEE analyses, end-of-life discussions during weekly meetings [odds ratio (OR) 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30–0.99], end-of-life guidelines [OR 0.52, (0.31–0.87)] and protocols [OR 15.08, (3.88–58.59)], palliative care consultations [OR 2.63, (1.23–5.60)] and end-of-life legislation [OR 3.24, 1.60–6.55)] were significantly associated with limitation decisions (all P < 0.05). In worldwide GEE analyses, the weighted end-of-life practice score was significantly associated with limitation decisions [OR 1.12 (1.03–1.22); P = 0.008]. Conclusions Comparison study-derived, weighted end-of-life practice score partly explained the worldwide study’s variation in treatment limitations. The most important components of the weighted end-of-life practice score were ICU end-of-life protocols, palliative care consultations, and country end-of-life legislation.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-03971-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyros D Mentzelopoulos
- First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Evaggelismos General Hospital, 45-47 Ipsilandou Street, 10675, Athens, Greece.
| | - Su Chen
- D2, K Lab, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Kruser
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Christiane Hartog
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Klinik Bavaria, Kreischa, Germany
| | - Andrej Michalsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Therapy, Konstanz Hospital, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Efstathiou
- School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gavin M Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Suzana Lobo
- Critical Care Division - Faculty of Medicine São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexander Avidan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Charles L Sprung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manjappachar NK, Cuenca JA, Ramírez CM, Hernandez M, Martin P, Reyes MP, Heatter AJ, Gutierrez C, Rathi N, Sprung CL, Price KJ, Nates JL. Outcomes and Predictors of 28-Day Mortality in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Septic Shock Defined by Sepsis-3 Criteria. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:45-53. [PMID: 34991066 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To describe short-term outcomes and independent predictors of 28-dayx mortality in adult patients with hematologic malignancies and septic shock defined by the new Third International Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-3) criteria. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU with septic shock from April 2016 to March 2019. Demographic and clinical features and short-term outcomes were collected. We used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics, logistic regression to identify predictors of 28-day mortality, and Kaplan-Meier plots to assess survival. RESULTS Among the 459 hematologic patients with septic shock admitted to the ICU, 109 (23.7%) had received hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median age was 63 years (range, 18-89 years), and 179 (39%) were women. Nonsurvivors had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (P=.007), longer length of stay before ICU admission (P=.01), and greater illness severity at diagnosis and throughout the hospital course (P<.001). The mortality rate at 28 days was 67.8% and increased with increasing sequential organ failure assessment score on admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20), respiratory failure (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.49-6.51), and maximum lactate level (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22). Aminoglycosides administration (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26-0.69), serum albumin (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31-0.86), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.65) were associated with lower 28-day mortality. Life support limitations were present in 81.6% of patients at death. At 90 days, 19.4% of the patients were alive. CONCLUSIONS Despite efforts to enhance survival, septic shock in patients with hematologic malignancies is still associated with high mortality rates and poor 90-day survival. These results demonstrate the need for an urgent call to action with higher awareness, including the further evaluation of interventions such as earlier ICU admission, aminoglycosides administration, and G-CSF treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John A Cuenca
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Claudia M Ramírez
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Mike Hernandez
- 2Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and
| | - Peyton Martin
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Maria P Reyes
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Alba J Heatter
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Cristina Gutierrez
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Nisha Rathi
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Charles L Sprung
- 3Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kristen J Price
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| | - Joseph L Nates
- 1Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, and
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Avidan A, Sprung CL, Schefold JC, Ricou B, Hartog CS, Nates JL, Jaschinski U, Lobo SM, Joynt GM, Lesieur O, Weiss M, Antonelli M, Bülow HH, Bocci MG, Robertsen A, Anstey MH, Estébanez-Montiel B, Lautrette A, Gruber A, Estella A, Mullick S, Sreedharan R, Michalsen A, Feldman C, Tisljar K, Posch M, Ovu S, Tamowicz B, Demoule A, DeKeyser Ganz F, Pargger H, Noto A, Metnitz P, Zubek L, de la Guardia V, Danbury CM, Szűcs O, Protti A, Filipe M, Simpson SQ, Green C, Giannini AM, Soliman IW, Piras C, Caser EB, Hache-Marliere M, Mentzelopoulos SD. Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9:1101-1110. [PMID: 34364537 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00261-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-of-life practices vary among intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide. Differences can result in variable use of disproportionate or non-beneficial life-sustaining interventions across diverse world regions. This study investigated global disparities in end-of-life practices. METHODS In this prospective, multinational, observational study, consecutive adult ICU patients who died or had a limitation of life-sustaining treatment (withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy and active shortening of the dying process) during a 6-month period between Sept 1, 2015, and Sept 30, 2016, were recruited from 199 ICUs in 36 countries. The primary outcome was the end-of-life practice as defined by the end-of-life categories: withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy, active shortening of the dying process, or failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Patients with brain death were included in a separate predefined end-of-life category. Data collection included patient characteristics, diagnoses, end-of-life decisions and their timing related to admission and discharge, or death, with comparisons across different regions. Patients were studied until death or 2 months from the first limitation decision. FINDINGS Of 87 951 patients admitted to ICU, 12 850 (14·6%) were included in the study population. The number of patients categorised into each of the different end-of-life categories were significantly different for each region (p<0·001). Limitation of life-sustaining treatment occurred in 10 401 patients (11·8% of 87 951 ICU admissions and 80·9% of 12 850 in the study population). The most common limitation was withholding life-sustaining treatment (5661 [44·1%]), followed by withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (4680 [36·4%]). More treatment withdrawing was observed in Northern Europe (1217 [52·8%] of 2305) and Australia/New Zealand (247 [45·7%] of 541) than in Latin America (33 [5·8%] of 571) and Africa (21 [13·0%] of 162). Shortening of the dying process was uncommon across all regions (60 [0·5%]). One in five patients with treatment limitations survived hospitalisation. Death due to failed CPR occurred in 1799 (14%) of the study population, and brain death occurred in 650 (5·1%). Failure of CPR occurred less frequently in Northern Europe (85 [3·7%] of 2305), Australia/New Zealand (23 [4·3%] of 541), and North America (78 [8·5%] of 918) than in Africa (106 [65·4%] of 162), Latin America (160 [28·0%] of 571), and Southern Europe (590 [22·5%] of 2622). Factors associated with treatment limitations were region, age, and diagnoses (acute and chronic), and country end-of-life legislation. INTERPRETATION Limitation of life-sustaining therapies is common worldwide with regional variability. Withholding treatment is more common than withdrawing treatment. Variations in type, frequency, and timing of end-of-life decisions were observed. Recognising regional differences and the reasons behind these differences might help improve end-of-life care worldwide. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Avidan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Charles L Sprung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Joerg C Schefold
- Inselspital, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Bara Ricou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christiane S Hartog
- Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, and Klinik Bavaria, Kreischa, Germany
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ulrich Jaschinski
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Suzana M Lobo
- Intensive Care Division, São José do Rio Preto School of Medicine, São Jose do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gavin M Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Olivier Lesieur
- Intensive Care Unit, Saint Louis General Hospital, La Rochelle, France
| | - Manfred Weiss
- Clinic of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Medical School, Ulm, Germany
| | - Massimo Antonelli
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Hans-Henrik Bülow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Holbaek University Hospital, Zealand Region, Denmark
| | - Maria G Bocci
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Annette Robertsen
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Alexandre Lautrette
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anastasiia Gruber
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Angel Estella
- Intensive Care Department, University Hospital SAS of Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | | | - Roshni Sreedharan
- Department of General Anesthesiology, Department of Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrej Michalsen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medizin Campus Bodensee-Tettnang Hospital, Tettnang, Germany
| | - Charles Feldman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Kai Tisljar
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Posch
- Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Steven Ovu
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barbara Tamowicz
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Alexandre Demoule
- Service de Médecine intensive- Réanimation, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, and UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Freda DeKeyser Ganz
- Hadassah Hebrew University School of Nursing and Jerusalem College of Technology, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hans Pargger
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Noto
- Department of Human Pathology of the Adult and Evolutive Age "Gaetano Barresi", Division of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Philipp Metnitz
- Department of General Anaesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, LKH-University Hospital of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Laszlo Zubek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Veronica de la Guardia
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Orsolya Szűcs
- 1st Department of Surgery and Interventional Gastroenterology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Alessandro Protti
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Mario Filipe
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, DPC Hospital Budapest, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Steven Q Simpson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Cameron Green
- Department of Intensive Care, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alberto M Giannini
- Division of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST-Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ivo W Soliman
- Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eliana B Caser
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Federal do Espírito Santo, Espírito Santo, Brazil
| | - Manuel Hache-Marliere
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and Department of Internal Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center-AECOM, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Spyros D Mentzelopoulos
- First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Evaggelsimos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
As the cancer population increases and immunotherapy becomes widely utilized, severe toxicities from these treatments will become more prevalent. In cancer patients, the most common immunotherapies that lead to critical illness are chimeric antigen receptor T cells, monoclonal antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Awareness of their toxicities by the intensive care unit team is of extreme importance. A multidisciplinary approach for diagnosis and treatment is recommended. This article reviews the most common toxicities from immunotherapy and offers a therapy-specific and system-based approach for affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Gutierrez
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard. Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Colleen McEvoy
- Stem Cell Transplant and Oncology Intensive Care Unit, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Ave, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Daniel Reynolds
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 4523 Clayton Ave, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard. Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Khorsandi M, Manjappachar N, Mazer A, Karpman M, Grover J, Nates JL, Reddy DR, Muganlinskaya N. OUTCOMES OF LIFE-THREATENING CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS AND CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 19- A COHORT STUDY. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021. [PMCID: PMC8091364 DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(21)04472-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
Affiliation(s)
- Charles L Sprung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gavin M Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Robert D Truog
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jordi Rello
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- London's Air Ambulance, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Clinical Research/Epidemiology in Pneumonia and Sepsis, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red en Efermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Research, CHU Nîmes, NÎmes, France
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Laserna A, Durán-Crane A, López-Olivo MA, Cuenca JA, Fowler C, Díaz DP, Cardenas YR, Urso C, O'Connell K, Fowler C, Price KJ, Sprung CL, Nates JL. Pain management during the withholding and withdrawal of life support in critically ill patients at the end-of-life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:1671-1682. [PMID: 32833041 PMCID: PMC7444163 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06139-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To review and summarize the most frequent medications and dosages used during withholding and withdrawal of life-prolonging measures in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Virtual Health Library from inception through March 2019. We considered any study evaluating pharmaceutical interventions for pain management during the withholding or withdrawing of life support in adult critically ill patients at the end-of-life. Two independent investigators performed the screening and data extraction. We pooled data on utilization rate of analgesic and sedative drugs and summarized the dosing between the moment prior to withholding or withdrawal of life support and the moment before death. Results Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in the United States (38%), Canada (31%), and the Netherlands (31%). Eleven studies were single-cohort and twelve had a Newcastle–Ottawa Scale score of less than 7. The mean age of the patients ranged from 59 to 71 years, 59–100% were mechanically ventilated, and 47–100% of the patients underwent life support withdrawal. The most commonly used opioid and sedative were morphine [utilization rate 60% (95% CI 48–71%)] and midazolam [utilization rate 28% (95% CI 23–32%)], respectively. Doses increased during the end-of-life process (pooled mean increase in the dose of morphine: 2.6 mg/h, 95% CI 1.2–4). Conclusions Pain control is centered on opioids and adjunctive benzodiazepines, with dosages exceeding those recommended by guidelines. Despite consistency among guidelines, there is significant heterogeneity among practices in end-of-life care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-06139-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andres Laserna
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - María A López-Olivo
- Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cosmo Fowler
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University-MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Diana Paola Díaz
- Department of Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Yenny R Cardenas
- Department of Critical Care, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Catherine Urso
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keara O'Connell
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Clara Fowler
- Research Services and Assessment, Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristen J Price
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles L Sprung
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sprung CL, Joynt GM, Christian MD, Truog RD, Rello J, Nates JL. Adult ICU Triage During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Who Will Live and Who Will Die? Recommendations to Improve Survival. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:1196-1202. [PMID: 32697491 PMCID: PMC7217126 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Coronavirus disease 2019 patients are currently overwhelming the world's healthcare systems. This article provides practical guidance to front-line physicians forced to make critical rationing decisions. DATA SOURCES PubMed and Medline search for scientific literature, reviews, and guidance documents related to epidemic ICU triage including from professional bodies. STUDY SELECTION Clinical studies, reviews, and guidelines were selected and reviewed by all authors and discussed by internet conference and email. DATA EXTRACTION References and data were based on relevance and author consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS We review key challenges of resource-driven triage and data from affected ICUs. We recommend that once available resources are maximally extended, triage is justified utilizing a strategy that provides the greatest good for the greatest number of patients. A triage algorithm based on clinical estimations of the incremental survival benefit (saving the most life-years) provided by ICU care is proposed. "First come, first served" is used to choose between individuals with equal priorities and benefits. The algorithm provides practical guidance, is easy to follow, rapidly implementable and flexible. It has four prioritization categories: performance score, ASA score, number of organ failures, and predicted survival. Individual units can readily adapt the algorithm to meet local requirements for the evolving pandemic. Although the algorithm improves consistency and provides practical and psychologic support to those performing triage, the final decision remains a clinical one. Depending on country and operational circumstances, triage decisions may be made by a triage team or individual doctors. However, an experienced critical care specialist physician should be ultimately responsible for the triage decision. Cautious discharge criteria are proposed acknowledging the difficulties to facilitate the admission of queuing patients. CONCLUSIONS Individual institutions may use this guidance to develop prospective protocols that assist the implementation of triage decisions to ensure fairness, enhance consistency, and decrease provider moral distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles L. Sprung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gavin M. Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Robert D. Truog
- Center for Bioethics, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jordi Rello
- Clinical Research/epidemiology in pneumonia and sepsis, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red en Efermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
- Clinical Research, CHU Nîmes, NÎmes, France
| | - Joseph L. Nates
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dong J, White S, Nielsen K, Banchs J, Wang J, Botz GH, Nates JL. Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion is a Predictor of Mortality for Septic Shock. Intern Med J 2020; 51:1854-1861. [PMID: 32618101 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cardiac dysfunction is a common sequela in patients with sepsis and multi-organ dysfunction. Echocardiography is commonly used in the investigation of circulatory failure. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of echocardiographic parameters in patients with septic shock. METHODS This study was a retrospective trial. We included patients who were admitted to ICU with septic shock. The patients' echocardiograms, clinical data, and outcomes were obtained from their medical records. Associations between echo-cardiogram variables and mortality were assessed using logistic regression, controlled for age, sex, BMI, and the interval between the ICU admission and echocardiogram. The utility of statistically significant echocardiogram variables to predict mortality were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS The outcomes presented that Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion(TAPSE) was statistically significantly associated with both ICU (p = 0.02) and 90-day (p = 0.001) mortality. From the ROC curves, TAPSE emerged a significant and moderate predictor for 90-day (area under curve (AUC) = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.565-0.814) and in-ICU mortality (AUC = 0.762, 95% CI = 0.652-0.871). The optimal cut-off for TAPSE was 2.1 cm for both 90-day mortality (sensitivity of 80% and specificity and 58%) and in-ICU mortality (sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 77%). CONCLUSION TAPSE was associated with increased mortality in those with sepsis and suspicion of cardiac dysfunction. This is a hypothesis generating paper that an association may be present and requires significant more work with expansion to the entire population base. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Dong
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit #112, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.,Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Intensive Care Unit department, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Seth White
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit #112, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| | - Kirsten Nielsen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit #112, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA.,Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Blvd 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Jose Banchs
- Department of Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit #112, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit #112, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| | - Gregory H Botz
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit #112, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit #112, Houston, Texas, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gutierrez C, Brown ART, Herr MM, Kadri SS, Hill B, Rajendram P, Duggal A, Turtle CJ, Patel K, Lin Y, May HP, Gallo de Moraes A, Maus MV, Frigault MJ, Brudno JN, Athale J, Shah NN, Kochenderfer JN, Dharshan A, Beitinjaneh A, Arias AS, McEvoy C, Mead E, Stephens RS, Nates JL, Neelapu SS, Pastores SM. The chimeric antigen receptor-intensive care unit (CAR-ICU) initiative: Surveying intensive care unit practices in the management of CAR T-cell associated toxicities. J Crit Care 2020; 58:58-64. [PMID: 32361219 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A task force of experts from 11 United States (US) centers, sought to describe practices for managing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell toxicity in the intensive care unit (ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between June-July 2019, a survey was electronically distributed to 11 centers. The survey addressed: CAR products, toxicities, targeted treatments, management practices and interventions in the ICU. RESULTS Most centers (82%) had experience with commercial and non-FDA approved CAR products. Criteria for ICU admission varied between centers for patients with Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) but were similar for Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS). Practices for vasopressor support, neurotoxicity and electroencephalogram monitoring, use of prophylactic anti-epileptic drugs and tocilizumab were comparable. In contrast, fluid resuscitation, respiratory support, methods of surveillance and management of cerebral edema, use of corticosteroid and other anti-cytokine therapies varied between centers. CONCLUSIONS This survey identified areas of investigation that could improve outcomes in CAR T-cell recipients such as fluid and vasopressor selection in CRS, management of respiratory failure, and less common complications such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, infections and stroke. The variability in specific treatments for CAR T-cell toxicities, needs to be considered when designing future outcome studies of critically ill CAR T-cell patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Gutierrez
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Anne Rain T Brown
- Clinical Pharmacy Specialist in Critical Care, Department of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Megan M Herr
- Transplant and Cellular Therapy Program, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States of America
| | - Sameer S Kadri
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Brian Hill
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Prabalini Rajendram
- Department of Critical Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Clinic Lerner School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Abhijit Duggal
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Cleveland Clinic and Assistant Professor of Medicine, Lerner School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Cameron J Turtle
- Anderson Family Endowed Chair for Immunotherapy, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Kevin Patel
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Alliance, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | - Yi Lin
- Division of Hematology, Division of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Heather P May
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Critical Care Clinical Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Alice Gallo de Moraes
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Marcela V Maus
- Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Mathew J Frigault
- Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer N Brudno
- Assistant Research Physician, Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, United States of America
| | - Janhavi Athale
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Nirali N Shah
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, United States of America
| | - James N Kochenderfer
- Surgery Branch of the National Cancer Institute, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, United States of America
| | - Ananda Dharshan
- Intensive Care Unit, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Jacobs School of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States of America
| | - Amer Beitinjaneh
- Department of Medicine, Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America
| | - Alejandro S Arias
- Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States of America
| | - Colleen McEvoy
- Stem Cell Transplant and Oncology Intensive Care Unit, Assistant Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States of America
| | - Elena Mead
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - R Scott Stephens
- Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant Critical Care, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Surgical and Medical Intensive Care Units, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Sattva S Neelapu
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Stephen M Pastores
- Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Myers RB, Ruiz JR, Jermaine CM, Nates JL. The Cumulative Perioperative Model: Predicting 30-Day Mortality in Abdominal Surgery Cancer Patients. J Surg Oncol 2020; 3. [PMID: 34632445 PMCID: PMC8496410 DOI: 10.31487/j.jso.2020.01.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: 1) To develop a cumulative perioperative model (CPM) using the hospital clinical course of abdominal surgery cancer patients that predicts 30 and 90-day mortality risk; 2) To compare the predictive ability of this model to ten existing other models.
Materials and Methods: We constructed a multivariate logistic regression model of 30 (90)-day mortality, which occurred in 106 (290) of the cases, using 13,877 major abdominal surgical cases performed at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2007 to March 2014. The model includes race, starting location (home, inpatient ward, intensive care unit or emergency center), Charlson Comorbidity Index, emergency status, ASA-PS classification, procedure, surgical Apgar score, destination after surgery (hospital ward location) and delayed intensive care unit admit within six days. We computed and compared the model mortality prediction ability (C-statistic) as we accumulated features over time.
Results: We were able to predict 30 (90)-day mortality with C-statistics from 0.70 (0.71) initially to 0.87 (0.84) within six days postoperatively.
Conclusion: We achieved a high level of model discrimination. The CPM enables a continuous cumulative assessment of the patient’s mortality risk, which could then be used as a decision support aid regarding patient care and treatment, potentially resulting in improved outcomes, decreased costs and more informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Risa B Myers
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, Texas,
USA
- Children’s Environmental Health Initiative, Rice
University, Texas, USA
| | - Joseph R Ruiz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine,
Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, Texas, USA
| | | | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology and
Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, USA
- Correspondence to: Joseph L Nates, M.D., M.B.A.,
Department of Critical Care, Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care,
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit #112,
Houston, Texas 77030, USA; Tel: 7137925040; Fax: 7137451869;
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Although aortoesophageal fistulas are rare, they can present as life-threatening emergencies. This condition can develop secondary to an aneurysm, foreign bodies, infiltrating tumors, and radiotherapy. We report a patient with hemorrhagic shock secondary to an aortoesophageal fistula. A 69-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated with chemoradiation and metallic stent placement was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after an episode of hematemesis. The patient was hemodynamically unstable, requiring fluid resuscitation, blood transfusions, and respiratory and vasopressor support. The patient developed electric pulseless activity, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed for 40 minutes. An upper endoscopy showed the esophageal tumor infiltrating into the stent, and computed tomography (CT) angiogram showed leakage of contrast from the thoracic aorta to the esophagus. The diagnosis of aortoesophageal fistula was made. The patient underwent endovascular management for the fistula. However, his critical condition did not improve, and the patient perished.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Guerrero
- Department of Surgery, San Ignacio Hospital-Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, COL
| | - John A Cuenca
- Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Yenny R Cardenas
- Department of Critical and Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe De Bogotá, Bogota, COL
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abudayyeh A, Song J, Abdelrahim M, Dahbour I, Page VD, Zhou S, Shen C, Zhao B, Pai RN, Amaram-Davila J, Manzano JG, George MC, Yennu S, Mandayam SA, Nates JL, Moss AH. Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients With Stage IV Cancer Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit With Acute Kidney Injury at a Comprehensive Cancer Center Was Not Associated With Survival. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 37:707-715. [PMID: 31986903 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120902115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In patients with advanced cancer, prolongation of life with treatment often incurs substantial emotional and financial expense. Among hospitalized patients with cancer since acute kidney injury (AKI) is known to be associated with much higher odds for hospital mortality, we investigated whether renal replacement therapy (RRT) use in the intensive care unit (ICU) was a significant independent predictor of worse outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed patients admitted in 2005 to 2014 who were diagnosed with stage IV solid tumors, had AKI, and a nephrology consult. The main outcomes were survival times from the landmark time points, inpatient mortality, and longer term survival after hospital discharge. Logistic regression and Cox proportional regression were used to compare inpatient mortality and longer term survival between RRT and non-RRT groups. Propensity score-matched landmark survival analyses were performed with 2 landmark time points chosen at day 2 and at day 7 from ICU admission. RESULTS Of the 465 patients with stage IV cancer admitted to the ICU with AKI, 176 needed RRT. In the multivariate logistic regression model after adjusting for baseline serum albumin and baseline maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), the patients who received RRT were not significantly different from non-RRT patients in inpatient mortality (odds ratio: 1.004 [95% confidence interval: 0.598-1.684], P = .9892). In total, 189 patients were evaluated for the impact of RRT on long-term survival and concluded that RRT was not significantly associated with long-term survival after discharge for patients who discharged alive. Landmark analyses at day 2 and day 7 confirmed the same findings. CONCLUSIONS Our study found that receiving RRT in the ICU was not significantly associated with inpatient mortality, survival times from the landmark time points, and long-term survival after discharge for patients with stage IV cancer with AKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala Abudayyeh
- Division of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Juhee Song
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maen Abdelrahim
- Institute of Academic Medicine and Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ibrahim Dahbour
- Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Valda D Page
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shouhao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chan Shen
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bo Zhao
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rima N Pai
- Division of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaya Amaram-Davila
- Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joanna-Grace Manzano
- Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marina C George
- Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sriram Yennu
- Department of Palliative Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sreedhar A Mandayam
- Division of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alvin H Moss
- Sections of Nephrology and Supportive Care, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an established therapeutic modality for a number of malignant and nonmalignant conditions. Pulmonary complications following HSCT are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. These complications may be classified into infectious versus noninfectious, and early versus late based on the time of occurrence post-transplant. Thus, exclusion of infectious etiologies is the first step in the diagnoses of pulmonary complications. Late onset noninfectious pulmonary complications typically occur 3 months post-transplant. Bronchiolitis obliterans is the major contributor to late-onset pulmonary complications, and its clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and current therapeutic approaches are discussed. Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome is another important complication which usually occurs early, although its onset may be delayed. Organizing pneumonia is important to recognize due to its responsiveness to corticosteroids. Other late onset noninfectious pulmonary complications discussed here include pulmonary venoocclusive disease, pulmonary cytolytic thrombi, pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis, thoracic air leak syndrome, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kristen J. Price
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nates JL, Price KJ. Noninvasive Oxygen Therapies in Oncologic Patients. Oncologic Critical Care 2020. [PMCID: PMC7122985 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74588-6_197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) is the most common cause of critical illness in oncologic patients. Despite significant advancements in survival of oncologic patients who develop critical illness, mortality rates in those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation have improved but remain high. Avoiding intubation is paramount to the management of oncologic patients with ARF. There are important differences between the oncologic patient with ARF compared to the general ICU population that likely underlie the increased mortality once intubated. Noninvasive oxygen modalities have been recognized as an important therapeutic approach to prevent intubation. Continuous low-flow oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, and high-flow nasal cannula are the most commonly used noninvasive oxygen therapies in recent years. They have unique physiologic properties. The data surrounding their efficacy in the general ICU population and oncologic population has evolved over time reflecting the changes in the oncologic population. This chapter reviews the three different noninvasive oxygen modalities, their physiologic impact, and evidence surrounding their effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kristen J. Price
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Lung injury associated with cancer therapeutics is often the limiting factor that trumps otherwise successful cancer therapy. Thoracic radiation as well as cancer pharmacotherapeutics, including conventional chemotherapy, molecular targeted agents, and cancer immunotherapies, have been associated with a unique spectrum of histopathologic injury patterns that may involve the lung parenchyma, pleura, airways, and/or pulmonary vasculature. Injury patterns may be idiosyncratic, unpredictable, and highly variable from one agent class to the next. Variability in lung injury patterns within a specific therapeutic class of drugs also occurs, adding to the conundrum. Drug-induced toxicities to the thoracic cavity are infrequent, and early recognition of clinical clues portends a good outcome in most cases. Failure to recognize early clinical signs, however, may result in irreversible and potentially lethal consequences. This chapter provides an overview of our current knowledge of thoracic complications associated with cancer pharmacotherapies. The review is not intended to be a treatise of all cancer agents that adversely affect the lungs, but rather a discussion of established risk factors and histopathologic patterns of lung injury associated with broad classes of cancer agents. Optimal management strategies, based on existing clinical experience, will also be discussed. Complications associated with thoracic radiation are also reviewed. It is hoped that these discussions will facilitate early recognition and management of treatment-related thoracic complications and, ultimately, better patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kristen J. Price
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sprung CL, Ricou B, Hartog CS, Maia P, Mentzelopoulos SD, Weiss M, Levin PD, Galarza L, de la Guardia V, Schefold JC, Baras M, Joynt GM, Bülow HH, Nakos G, Cerny V, Marsch S, Girbes AR, Ingels C, Miskolci O, Ledoux D, Mullick S, Bocci MG, Gjedsted J, Estébanez B, Nates JL, Lesieur O, Sreedharan R, Giannini AM, Fuciños LC, Danbury CM, Michalsen A, Soliman IW, Estella A, Avidan A. Changes in End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units From 1999 to 2016. JAMA 2019; 322:1692-1704. [PMID: 31577037 PMCID: PMC6777263 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.14608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE End-of-life decisions occur daily in intensive care units (ICUs) around the world, and these practices could change over time. OBJECTIVE To determine the changes in end-of-life practices in European ICUs after 16 years. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Ethicus-2 was a prospective observational study of 22 European ICUs previously included in the Ethicus-1 study (1999-2000). During a self-selected continuous 6-month period at each ICU, consecutive patients who died or had any limitation of life-sustaining therapy from September 2015 until October 2016 were included. Patients were followed up until death or until 2 months after the first treatment limitation decision. EXPOSURES Comparison between the 1999-2000 cohort vs 2015-2016 cohort. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES End-of-life outcomes were classified into 5 mutually exclusive categories (withholding of life-prolonging therapy, withdrawing of life-prolonging therapy, active shortening of the dying process, failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], brain death). The primary outcome was whether patients received any treatment limitations (withholding or withdrawing of life-prolonging therapy or shortening of the dying process). Outcomes were determined by senior intensivists. RESULTS Of 13 625 patients admitted to participating ICUs during the 2015-2016 study period, 1785 (13.1%) died or had limitations of life-prolonging therapies and were included in the study. Compared with the patients included in the 1999-2000 cohort (n = 2807), the patients in 2015-2016 cohort were significantly older (median age, 70 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 59-79] vs 67 years [IQR, 54-75]; P < .001) and the proportion of female patients was similar (39.6% vs 38.7%; P = .58). Significantly more treatment limitations occurred in the 2015-2016 cohort compared with the 1999-2000 cohort (1601 [89.7%] vs 1918 [68.3%]; difference, 21.4% [95% CI, 19.2% to 23.6%]; P < .001), with more withholding of life-prolonging therapy (892 [50.0%] vs 1143 [40.7%]; difference, 9.3% [95% CI, 6.4% to 12.3%]; P < .001), more withdrawing of life-prolonging therapy (692 [38.8%] vs 695 [24.8%]; difference, 14.0% [95% CI, 11.2% to 16.8%]; P < .001), less failed CPR (110 [6.2%] vs 628 [22.4%]; difference, -16.2% [95% CI, -18.1% to -14.3%]; P < .001), less brain death (74 [4.1%] vs 261 [9.3%]; difference, -5.2% [95% CI, -6.6% to -3.8%]; P < .001) and less active shortening of the dying process (17 [1.0%] vs 80 [2.9%]; difference, -1.9% [95% CI, -2.7% to -1.1%]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients who had treatment limitations or died in 22 European ICUs in 2015-2016, compared with data reported from the same ICUs in 1999-2000, limitations in life-prolonging therapies occurred significantly more frequently and death without limitations in life-prolonging therapies occurred significantly less frequently. These findings suggest a shift in end-of-life practices in European ICUs, but the study is limited in that it excluded patients who survived ICU hospitalization without treatment limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles L. Sprung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Bara Ricou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christiane S. Hartog
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin and Klinik Bavaria, Kreischa, Germany
| | - Paulo Maia
- Intensive Care Department, Hospital S. Antonio, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Spyros D. Mentzelopoulos
- First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Athens Medical School, Evaggelsimos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Manfred Weiss
- Clinic of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Medical School, Ulm, Germany
| | - Phillip D. Levin
- General Intensive Care Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Laura Galarza
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Veronica de la Guardia
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Joerg C. Schefold
- Inselspital, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mario Baras
- The Hebrew University—Hadassah School of Public Health, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gavin M. Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hans-Henrik Bülow
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Holbaek University Hospital, Zealand Region, Denmark
| | - Georgios Nakos
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Vladimir Cerny
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Intensive Care, J.E. Purkinje University, Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
| | - Stephan Marsch
- Medical Intensive Care, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Armand R. Girbes
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Catherine Ingels
- Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals K.U. Leuven, Leuven Belgium
| | - Orsolya Miskolci
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Intensive Care Unit, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Didier Ledoux
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Maria G. Bocci
- Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jakob Gjedsted
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Belén Estébanez
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joseph L. Nates
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Olivier Lesieur
- Intensive Care Unit, Saint Louis General Hospital, La Rochelle, France
| | - Roshni Sreedharan
- Department of General Anesthesiology, Center for Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alberto M. Giannini
- Division of Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrej Michalsen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medizin Campus Bodensee-Tettnang Hospital, Tettnang, Germany
| | - Ivo W. Soliman
- Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Angel Estella
- Intensive Care Department, University Hospital SAS of Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain
| | - Alexander Avidan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Celis-Rodríguez E, Díaz Cortés JC, Cárdenas Bolívar YR, Carrizosa González JA, Pinilla DI, Ferrer Záccaro LE, Birchenall C, Caballero López J, Argüello BM, Castillo Abrego G, Castorena Arellano G, Dueñas Castell C, Jáuregui Solórzano JM, Leal R, Pardo Oviedo JM, Arroyo M, Raffán-Sanabria F, Raimondi N, Reina R, Rodríguez Lima DR, Silesky Jiménez JI, Ugarte Ubiergo S, Gómez Escobar LG, Díaz Aya DP, Fowler C, Nates JL. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of sedoanalgesia and delirium in critically ill adult patients. Med Intensiva 2019; 44:171-184. [PMID: 31492476 DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Given the importance of the management of sedation, analgesia and delirium in Intensive Care Units, and in order to update the previously published guidelines, a new clinical practice guide is presented, addressing the most relevant management and intervention aspects based on the recent literature. A group of 24 intensivists from 9 countries of the Pan-American and Iberian Federation of Societies of Critical Medicine and Intensive Therapy met to develop the guidelines. Assessment of evidence quality and recommendations was made according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group. A systematic search of the literature was carried out using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library databases such as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and the database of Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS). A total of 438 references were selected. After consensus, 47 strong recommendations with high and moderate quality evidence, 14 conditional recommendations with moderate quality evidence, and 65 conditional recommendations with low quality evidence were established. Finally, the importance of initial and multimodal pain management was underscored. Emphasis was placed on decreasing sedation levels and the use of deep sedation only in specific cases. The evidence and recommendations for the use of drugs such as dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, ketamine and others were incremented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Celis-Rodríguez
- Anestesiología y Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Departamento de Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Universidad del Rosario, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
| | - J C Díaz Cortés
- Anestesiología, Medicina Crítica y Epidemiología, Clínica Marly JCG, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Y R Cárdenas Bolívar
- Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Universidad del Rosario, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - J A Carrizosa González
- Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Epidemiología, Universidad del Rosario, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - D-I Pinilla
- Anestesiología, Medicina Crítica, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Hospital Mayor de Mederi, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - L E Ferrer Záccaro
- Anestesiología y Medicina Crítica, Universidad de Los Andes, Universidad El Bosque, Universidad del Rosario, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - C Birchenall
- Medicina Interna y Cuidado Intensivo, Clínica Universitaria Colombia, Hospital Universitario Mayor-Mederi, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - J Caballero López
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova de LLeida, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de LLeida IRBLleida, Departament de Medicina de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona UAB, España
| | - B M Argüello
- Anestesiología y Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Hospital Central de Managua, Managua, Nicaragua
| | - G Castillo Abrego
- Cirugía General, Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Pacífica Salud-Hospital Punta Pacífica, Panamá, República de Panamá
| | - G Castorena Arellano
- Anestesiología y Medicina Crítica, Hospital General Manuel Gea González, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México
| | - C Dueñas Castell
- Neumología y Medicina Crítica, Universidad de Cartagena, UCI Gestión Salud, UCI Santa Cruz de Bocagrande, Federación Panamericana e Ibérica de Medicina Crítica y Terapia Intensiva, Cartagena, Colombia
| | | | - R Leal
- Anestesiología, Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, Ciudad de México, México
| | - J M Pardo Oviedo
- Medicina Interna y Medicina Crítica y Cuidados Intensivos, Universidad del Rosario, Universidad del Bosque, Hospital Universitario Mayor-Mederi, Fundación Cardio-infantil, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - M Arroyo
- Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Servicio de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - F Raffán-Sanabria
- Anestesiología y Medicina Crítica, Universidad del Bosque, Universidad de Los Andes, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - N Raimondi
- Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Hospital Juan A. Fernández, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Reina
- Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Hospital Interzonal de Agudos General José de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - D R Rodríguez Lima
- Medicina de Emergencias y Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo Universidad del Rosario, Hospital Mayor Mederi, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - J I Silesky Jiménez
- Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Casa Hospital San Juan de Dios/ Hospital CIMA, San José, Costa Rica
| | - S Ugarte Ubiergo
- Medicina Interna y Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Universidad Andrés Bello, Clínica INDISA, Red de Medicina Intensiva, Federación Panamericana e Ibérica de Medicina Crítica y Terapia Intensiva, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - L G Gómez Escobar
- Medicina, Universidad de Los Andes, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - D P Díaz Aya
- Medicina, Universidad de Los Andes, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - C Fowler
- Research Services & Assessment Manager, Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, EE. UU
| | - J L Nates
- Anestesiología y Medicina Crítica y Cuidado Intensivo, Departamento de Medicina Crítica, Cuidado Intensivo y Terapia Respiratoria; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, EE. UU
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Nosocomial infections or healthcare-acquired infections are a common cause of increased morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Cancer patients are at an increased risk for these infections due to their immunosuppressed states. Considering these adverse effects on and the socioeconomic burden, efforts should be made to minimize the transmission of these infections and make the hospitals a safer environment. These infection rates can be significantly reduced by the implementing and improving compliance with the “care bundles.” This chapter will address the common nosocomial infections such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), and surgical site infections (SSI), including preventive strategies and care bundles for the same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kristen J. Price
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are immunologic reactions to several stimuli, mostly medications, which present as a spectrum of primarily widespread mucocutaneous lesions, but also with other organ involvement. Pathology is characterized by full thickness necrosis of the epithelial layer of the involved organ due to immune-mediated apoptosis of the resident keratinocytes. High suspicion for early detection and quick withdrawal of the culprit medication are the most important steps in stopping this reaction. Aggressive supportive care is often necessary as the patient recovers. Steroids, other immunosuppressants, and plasmapheresis have all been studied as treatments, but high-quality evidence supporting their contributions, either together or separately, in decreasing length of hospital stay or prolonging survival have not been consistently demonstrated. Further studies of the mechanism of action and novel treatment modalities are still needed to improve outcomes in patients with this rare but often fatal condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kristen J. Price
- Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Department of Critical Care and Respiratory Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rathi NK, Haque SA, Morales F, Kaul B, Ramirez R, Ovu S, Feng L, Dong W, Price KJ, Ugarte S, Raimondi N, Quintero A, Cardenas YR, Nates JL. Variability in triage practices for critically ill cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Crit Care 2019; 53:18-24. [PMID: 31174172 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2019] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensive care triage practices and end-user interpretation of triage guidelines have rarely been assessed. We evaluated agreement between providers on the prioritization of patients for ICU admission using different triage guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multi-centered randomized study on providers from 18 different countries was conducted using clinical vignettes of oncological patients. The level of agreement between providers was measured using two different guidelines, with one being cancer specific. RESULTS Amongst 257 providers, 52.5% randomly received the Society of Critical Care Prioritization Model, and 47.5% received a cancer specific flowchart as a guide. In the Prioritization Model arm the average entropy was 1.193, versus 1.153 in the flowchart arm (P = .095) indicating similarly poor agreement. The Fleiss' kappa coefficients were estimated to be 0.2136 for the SCCMPM arm and 0.2457 for the flowchart arm, also similarly implying poor agreement. CONCLUSIONS The low agreement amongst practitioners on the prioritization of cancer patient cases for ICU admission existed using both general triage guidelines and guidelines tailored only to cancer patients. The lack of consensus on intensive care unit triage practices in the oncological population exposes a potential barrier to appropriate resource allocation that needs to be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha K Rathi
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | - Sajid A Haque
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | - Freddy Morales
- Hospital Oncológico "Dr. Julio Villacreses Colmont" SOLCA Manabí, Núcleo de Portoviejo, Autopista del Valle Manabí Guillen en Portoviejo, Manibi, Ecuador
| | - Bhavika Kaul
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | - Rafael Ramirez
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | - Steven Ovu
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | - Lei Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Wenli Dong
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
| | - Kristen J Price
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | - Sebastian Ugarte
- INDISA Clinic, Salvador's Hospital, Avenida Santa Maria 1810, Providencia Region Metropolitana, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nestor Raimondi
- Juan A. Fernandez Hospital, Cervino 3356, C1425AGP CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Yenny R Cardenas
- Critical Care Department, Universidad del Rosario, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Carrera 7 No. 117 - 15, Bogota DC, Colombia
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
White ST, Cardenas YR, Nates JL. What every intensivist should know about intensive care unit admission criteria. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2018; 29:414-417. [PMID: 29340534 PMCID: PMC5764552 DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20170073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Seth T White
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center - Texas, United States
| | - Yenny R Cardenas
- Critical Care Department, Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá - Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center - Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Nates JL, Cattano D, Costa FS, Chelly JE, Doursout MF. Thromboelastographic assessment of the impact of mexiletine on coagulation abnormalities induced by air or normal saline intravenous injections in conscious rats. Diving Hyperb Med 2017; 47:228-232. [PMID: 29241232 PMCID: PMC6706339 DOI: 10.28920/dhm47.4.228-232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thromboelastography (TEG) in venous air embolism (VAE) has been poorly studied. We induced coagulation abnormalities by VAE in a rat model, assessed by TEG with and without mexiletine, a lidocaine analogue local anesthetic. METHODS Twenty-three Sprague Dawley rats instrumented under isoflurane anesthesia and allowed to recover five days prior to the experiments were randomized into three experimental groups: 1) VAE (n = 6); 2) VAE and mexiletine (n = 9); and 3) normal saline (NS) alone (control group, n = 8). Blood samples were collected at baseline, one hour (h) and 24 h in all groups and analyzed by TEG to record the R, K, angle α and MA parameters. RESULTS In Group 1, VAE decreased significantly R at 1 h (31%), K at 1 h (59%) and 24 h (34%); α increased significantly at 1 h (30%) and 24 h (22%). While R returned to baseline values within 24 h, K, MA and α did not. In group-2 (Mexiletine + VAE), K and R decreased at 1 h (48% and 29%, respectively) and at 24 h the changes were non-significant. Angle α increased at 1 h (28%) and remained increased for 24 h (25%). In group 3 (NS), only R was temporarily affected. MA increased significantly at 24 h only in the VAE alone group. CONCLUSION As expected, VAE produced a consistent and significant hypercoagulable response diagnosed/confirmed by TEG. Mexiletine prevented the MA elevation seen with VAE and corrected R and K time at 24 h, whereas angle α remained unchanged. Mexiletine seemed to attenuate the hypercoagulability associated with VAE in this experiment. These results may have potential clinical applications and deserve further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Division of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 112, Houston, TX 77030, USA,
| | - Davide Cattano
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Jacques E Chelly
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marie-Francoise Doursout
- Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bayraktar UD, Milton DR, Shpall EJ, Rondon G, Price KJ, Champlin RE, Nates JL. Prognostic Index for Critically Ill Allogeneic Transplantation Patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 23:991-996. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
38
|
Ko HC, Yan M, Gupta R, Song J, Kebbel K, Maiti A, Nates JL, Overman MJ. Predictors of survival in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.e18050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18050 Background: Cancer patients have a high use of healthcare utilization at the end of life which can frequently involve admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU). We sought to evaluate the predictors for outcome in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients admitted to the ICU for non-surgical conditions. Methods: The objective of this study was to determine the factors associated with ICU mortality, hospital mortality and overall survival (OS). A total of 200 patients with GI cancer admitted to the ICU at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between November 2012 and February 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Cancer characteristics, treatment characteristics, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores defining severity based on 6 organ systems with scores ranging from 0 to 24 were analyzed for their effects on survival endpoints using multivariate logistic regression models and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: The characteristics of the 200 patients were: 64.5% male, mean age of 60 years, median admission SOFA score of 6.0, and tumor types of primary intestinal (37.5%), hepatobiliary/pancreatic (36%), and gastroesophageal (GE) (24%). The ICU mortality was 26%, hospital mortality was 41%, and 6-month OS estimate was 25%. In multivariate analysis, ICU admission SOFA score > 10 (odds ratio (OR) 17.1, p < 0.0001), poorly differentiated tumor grade (OR 3.2, p = 0.02), and shorter duration of metastatic disease (OR 2.3, p = 0.07) were associated with increased odds of ICU mortality. These same variables were associated with increased odds of hospital mortality. In multivariate OS analysis, SOFA score 6-10 (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, p = 0.0006) and SOFA score > 10 (HR 4.4, p < 0.0001), patients with GE primary (HR 2.2, p = 0.002) and patients with a poor outpatient performance status that precluded active chemotherapy (HR 2.2, p = 0.01) were associated with increased risk of death. Conclusions: The SOFA score was the most predictive factor for ICU mortality, hospital mortality, and OS for GI cancer patients admitted to the ICU. It should be utilized in all GI cancer patients upon ICU admission to improve both acute and longer-term prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Chwan Ko
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Melissa Yan
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rohan Gupta
- The University of Texas at Houston, Internal Medicine Residency, Houston, TX
| | - Juhee Song
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kayla Kebbel
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Abhishek Maiti
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Department of Internal Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Raimondi N, Vial MR, Calleja J, Quintero A, Cortés Alban A, Celis E, Pacheco C, Ugarte S, Añón JM, Hernández G, Vidal E, Chiappero G, Ríos F, Castilleja F, Matos A, Rodriguez E, Antoniazzi P, Teles JM, Dueñas C, Sinclair J, Martínez L, Von der Osten I, Vergara J, Jiménez E, Arroyo M, Rodriguez C, Torres J, Fernandez-Bussy S, Nates JL. Evidence-based guides in tracheostomy use in critical patients. Med Intensiva 2017; 41:94-115. [PMID: 28188061 DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2016.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Revised: 11/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Provide evidence based guidelines for tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients and identify areas needing further research. METHODS A task force composed of representatives of 10 member countries of the Pan-American and Iberic Federation of Societies of Critical and Intensive Therapy Medicine and of the Latin American Critical Care Trial Investigators Network developed recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS The group identified 23 relevant questions among 87 issues that were initially identified. In the initial search, 333 relevant publications were identified of which 226 publications were chosen. The task force generated a total of 19 recommendations: 10 positive (1B=3, 2C=3, 2D=4) and 9 negative (1B=8, 2C=1). A recommendation was not possible in six questions. CONCLUSION Percutaneous techniques are associated with a lower risk of infections compared to surgical tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy only seems to reduce the duration of ventilator use but not the incidence of pneumonia, the length of stay, or the long-term mortality rate. The evidence does not support the use of routine bronchoscopy guidance or laryngeal masks during the procedure. Finally, proper prior training is as important or even a more significant factor in reducing complications than the technique used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Raimondi
- Hospital Municipal Juan A. Fernández, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M R Vial
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Texas, United States; Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - J Calleja
- Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | - A Quintero
- Instituto Medico de Alta Tecnología, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia
| | - A Cortés Alban
- Clínica Mayor de Temuco, Hospital de Nueva Imperial, Universidad Mayor de Temuco, Temuco, Chile
| | - E Celis
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - C Pacheco
- Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - S Ugarte
- Hospital del Salvador, Clínica Indisa, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - J M Añón
- Hospital Universitario la Paz -Carlos III. IdiPaz, Madrid, España
| | - G Hernández
- Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | - E Vidal
- Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Hospital Español de México, Ciudad de México, México
| | - G Chiappero
- Hospital Juan A. Fernández CABA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F Ríos
- Hospital Nacional Alejandro Posadas, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F Castilleja
- Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México
| | - A Matos
- Complejo Hospitalario Caja de Seguro Social, Panamá
| | - E Rodriguez
- Complejo Hospitalario Caja de Seguro Social, Panamá
| | - P Antoniazzi
- Hospital Santa Casa, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - J M Teles
- Hospital de Urgências de Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
| | - C Dueñas
- Gestión Salud, Santa Cruz de Bocagrande, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
| | - J Sinclair
- Hospital Punta Pacífica, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Universidad de Panamá, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá
| | - L Martínez
- Hospital Policlínica Metropolitana, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - I Von der Osten
- Hospital Central "Miguel Pérez Carreño" IVSS, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - J Vergara
- Hospital Luis Vernaza, Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo "UEES", Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - E Jiménez
- Baylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, Estados Unidos
| | - M Arroyo
- Clínica Santa Sofía, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - C Rodriguez
- Instituto Medico de Alta Tecnología, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Colombia
| | - J Torres
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - S Fernandez-Bussy
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, Estados Unidos
| | - J L Nates
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Texas, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Rathi NK, Haque SA, Nates R, Kosturakis A, Wang H, Dong W, Feng L, Erfe RJ, Guajardo C, Withers L, Finch C, Price KJ, Nates JL. Noninvasivepositive pressure ventilation vsinvasive mechanical ventilation as first-line therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in cancer patients. J Crit Care 2017; 39:56-61. [PMID: 28213266 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 10/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients who received noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) vs invasive mechanical ventilation as first-line therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study of consecutive adult intensive care unit (ICU) cancer patients who received either conventional invasive mechanical ventilation or NIPPV as first-line therapy for hypoxemic respiratory failure. RESULTS Of the 1614 patients included, the NIPPV failure group had the greatest hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality (71.3%), and hospital mortality (79.5%) as compared with the other 2 groups (P < .0001). The variables independently associated with NIPPV failure included younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99; P=.031), non-Caucasian race (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.26; P=.006), presence of a hematologic malignancy (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.33-2.64; P=.0003), and a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17; P < .0001). There was no difference in mortality when comparing early vs late intubation (less than or greater than 24 or 48 hours) for the NIPPV failure group. CONCLUSION Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation failure is an independent risk factor for ICU mortality, but NIPPV patients who avoided intubation had the best outcomes compared with the other groups. Early vs late intubation did not have a significant impact on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nisha K Rathi
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Sajid A Haque
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ron Nates
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alyssa Kosturakis
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wenli Dong
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lei Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rose J Erfe
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christina Guajardo
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Laura Withers
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Clarence Finch
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kristen J Price
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Gutierrez C, Cárdenas YR, Bratcher K, Melancon J, Myers J, Campbell JY, Feng L, Price KJ, Nates JL. Out-of-Hospital ICU Transfers to an Oncological Referral Center: Characteristics, Resource Utilization, and Patient Outcomes. J Intensive Care Med 2016; 34:55-61. [PMID: 28030995 DOI: 10.1177/0885066616686536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine resource utilization and outcomes of out-of-hospital transfer patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a cancer referral center. DESIGN: Single-center cohort. SETTING: A tertiary oncological center. PATIENTS: Patients older than 18 years transferred to our ICU from an outside hospital between January 2013 and December 2015. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 2127 (90.3%) were emergency department (ED) ICU admissions and 228 (9.7%) out-of-hospital transfers. The ICU length of stay (LOS) was longer in the out-of-hospital transfers when compared to all other ED ICU admissions ( P = .001); however, ICU and hospital mortality were similar between both groups. The majority of patients were transferred for a higher level of care (77.2%); there was no difference in the amount of interventions performed, ICU LOS, and ICU mortality between nonhigher level-of-care and higher level-of-care patients. Factors associated with an ICU LOS ≥10days were a higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, weekend admissions, presence of shock, need for mechanical ventilation, and acute kidney injury on admission or during ICU stay ( P < .008). The ICU mortality of transferred patients was 17.5% and associated risk factors were older age, higher SOFA score on admission, use of mechanical ventilation and vasopressors during ICU stay, and renal failure on admission ( P < .0001). Data related to the transfer such as LOS at the outside facility, time of transfer, delay in transfer, and longer distance traveled were not associated with increased LOS or mortality in our study. CONCLUSION: Organ failure severity on admission, and not transfer-related factors, continues to be the best predictor of outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer when transferred from other facilities to the ICU. Our data suggest that transferring critically ill patients with cancer to a specialized center does not lead to worse outcomes or increased resource utilization when compared to patients admitted from the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Gutierrez
- 1 Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yenny R Cárdenas
- 2 Critical Care Department, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Kristie Bratcher
- 1 Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Judd Melancon
- 1 Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason Myers
- 1 Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeannee Y Campbell
- 1 Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lei Feng
- 3 Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston TX, USA
| | - Kristen J Price
- 1 Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- 1 Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Critical Care Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Raimondi N, Vial MR, Calleja J, Quintero A, Cortés A, Celis E, Pacheco C, Ugarte S, Añón JM, Hernández G, Vidal E, Chiappero G, Ríos F, Castilleja F, Matos A, Rodriguez E, Antoniazzi P, Teles JM, Dueñas C, Sinclair J, Martínez L, von der Osten I, Vergara J, Jiménez E, Arroyo M, Rodríguez C, Torres J, Fernandez-Bussy S, Nates JL. Evidence-based guidelines for the use of tracheostomy in critically ill patients. J Crit Care 2016; 38:304-318. [PMID: 28103536 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide evidence-based guidelines for tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients and identify areas needing further research. METHODS A taskforce composed of representatives of 10 member countries of the Pan-American and Iberic Federation of Societies of Critical and Intensive Therapy Medicine and of the Latin American Critical Care Trial Investigators Network developed recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. RESULTS The group identified 23 relevant questions among 87 issues that were initially identified. In the initial search, 333 relevant publications were identified, of which 226 publications were chosen. The taskforce generated a total of 19 recommendations, 10 positive (1B, 3; 2C, 3; 2D, 4) and 9 negative (1B, 8; 2C, 1). A recommendation was not possible in 6 questions. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous techniques are associated with a lower risk of infections compared with surgical tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy only seems to reduce the duration of ventilator use but not the incidence of pneumonia, the length of stay, or the long-term mortality rate. The evidence does not support the use of routine bronchoscopy guidance or laryngeal masks during the procedure. Finally, proper prior training is as important or even a more significant factor in reducing complications than the technique used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Néstor Raimondi
- Hospital Municipal Juan A. Fernández, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Macarena R Vial
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA; Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - José Calleja
- Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México
| | - Agamenón Quintero
- Instituto Médico de Alta Tecnología, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Córdoba, Colombia
| | - Albán Cortés
- Clínica Mayor de Temuco, Hospital de Nueva Imperial, Universidad Mayor de Temuco, Temuco, Chile
| | - Edgar Celis
- Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Clara Pacheco
- Hospital Universitario de Caracas, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Sebastián Ugarte
- Hospital del Salvador, Clínica Indisa, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - José M Añón
- Hospital Universitario La Paz-Carlos III. IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Erick Vidal
- Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Hospital Español de México, Ciudad de México, México
| | - Guillermo Chiappero
- Hospital Juan A. Fernández CABA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fernando Ríos
- Hospital Nacional Alejandro Posadas, Sanatorio Las Lomas, San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fernando Castilleja
- Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México
| | - Alfredo Matos
- Complejo Hospitalario Caja de Seguro Social, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá
| | - Enith Rodriguez
- Complejo Hospitalario Caja de Seguro Social, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá
| | - Paulo Antoniazzi
- Hospital Santa Casa de Ribeirão Preto, Centro Universitário Barao de Maua, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Carmelo Dueñas
- Gestión Salud, Santa Cruz de Bocagrande, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
| | - Jorge Sinclair
- Hospital Punta Pacífica, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Universidad de Panamá, Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá
| | | | - Ingrid von der Osten
- Hospital Central "Miguel Pérez Carreño" IVSS, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - José Vergara
- Hospital Luis Vernaza, Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo "UEES,", Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Edgar Jiménez
- Baylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
| | | | - Camilo Rodríguez
- Instituto Médico de Alta Tecnología, Universidad del Sinú, Montería, Córdoba, Colombia
| | - Javier Torres
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Sebastián Fernandez-Bussy
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Joseph L Nates
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dahbour IN, Abdelrahim M, Page VD, Zhou S, Shen C, Yennu S, Zhao B, Manzano JGM, George MC, Nates JL, Moss AH, Pai R, Abudayyeh A. Survival benefits among patients with end-stage renal disease receiving dialysis versus no dialysis. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.26_suppl.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
55 Background: Retrospective study of the outcomes of Stage IV Cancer Patients with End Stage Renal disease Receiving Dialysis and comparing the survival benefits among the patients who received Hemodialysis versus who didn’t at a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods: Retrospectively review all patients admitted to MDACC from 2005-2014 and diagnosed with stage IV solid tumor admitted with Acute kidney injury and a nephrology consult were included (N = 903) 19.82% received dialysis (n = 179) versus 80.17% did not receive dialysis (n = 724). The main endpoints of the study to be evaluated would be survival & hospital death. Results: Kaplan-Meier overall survival curve of the dialysis group vs the non-dialysis p-value < 0.001 indicating that patients who underwent dialysis had a poorer overall survival. This was further explored in a multivariate model where at any given time; a patient who underwent a dialysis is 1.318 times as likely to experience a death as a patient who did not undergo a dialysis with the same other clinical factors. The association between dialysis and death in hospital was explored using multivariate model indicated dialysis (odds ratio = 3.339, 95% CI (2.212, 5.04), p < 0.001, ICU (odds ratio = 2.624, 95% CI (1.905, 3.613), p < 0.001), and a lower serum albumin level (p < 0.001) are factors associated with a higher probability of death in hospital. Matched sample where evaluated using propensity score matching & Weighting and the dialysis group still shows a significant negative effect on Overall Survival with (p = 0.003). ICU patients Subset Analysis & SOFA Score: 49.9% had ICU visits in our database with SOFA scores (37.9% were dialyzed). Using propensity score weighting method, the estimated hazard rate is 0.892 with 95% CI (0.775, 1.027) and p = 0.113, showing NO evidence that dialysis is a prognostic factor for ICU patients after controlling SOFA score. In the ICU cohort, the median survival time for dialysis 18 days (95% CI: 14-23) and no dialysis 19 days (95% CI: 15-25). Conclusions: We can conclude that Dialysis when offered to advanced cancer patients does not improve mortality. Creating a hemodialysis prognostic tool relevant to cancer population would be of great benefit to Nephrologists, Oncologist and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Valda D Page
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Shouhao Zhou
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chan Shen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sriram Yennu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bo Zhao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alvin Howard Moss
- Department of Medicine, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV
| | - Rima Pai
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ala Abudayyeh
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Division of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gupta R, Heshami N, Jay C, Ramesh N, Song J, Lei X, Rose EJ, Carter K, Araujo DM, Benjamin RS, Patel S, Nates JL, Ravi V. Predictors of survival in patients with sarcoma admitted to the intensive care unit. Clin Sarcoma Res 2016; 6:12. [PMID: 27437097 PMCID: PMC4950117 DOI: 10.1186/s13569-016-0051-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in treatment of sarcoma patients has prolonged survival but has led to increased disease- or treatment-related complications resulting in greater number of admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU). Survival and long-term outcome information about such critically ill patients with sarcoma is unknown. METHODS The primary objective of the study was to determine the ICU and post-ICU survival rates of critically ill sarcoma patients. Secondary objectives included determining the modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of poor survival. We performed a retrospective chart review of sarcoma patients admitted to the ICU at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2012. Main outcome measures were ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality and 1, 2, and 6-month survival rates. Covariates such as histological diagnosis, disease characteristics, chemotherapy use, Charlson comorbidity index, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and clinical findings leading to ICU admission were analyzed for their effects on survival. RESULTS We identified 172 admissions over the 8-year study period hat met our inclusion criteria. The study population was 45.9 % males with a median age of 52 years. The most common sarcoma subgroups were high-grade unclassified sarcoma (25 %) and bone tumors (17.4 %). The ICU mortality rate was 23.3 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 16.9-29.6 %), and an additional 6.4 % of patients died before hospital discharge (95 % CI, 22.9-37.1 %). 6-month OS rates were 41 %. The median SOFA scores on admission were 6 (inter quartile range (IQR), 3.5-9) in ICU survivors and 10 (IQR, 6.5-14) in ICU non-survivors. Increase in SOFA scores ≥6 led to poor outcomes (ICU survival 13.3 %, OS 6.7 %). Charlson comorbidity index (HR 1.139, 95 % CI 1.023-1.268, p = 0.02) and discharge SOFA scores (HR 1.210, 95 % CI 1.141-1.283, p < 0.0001) correlated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that patients that are admitted to the ICU for respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, septic shock, acute renal failure or acidosis and also have a high SOFA score with subsequent worsening in the ICU have poor prognosis. Based on the retrospective data which needs further validation we can recommend that judicious approach should be taken in patients with predictors of poor survival before subjecting them to aggressive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Gupta
- The University of Texas at Houston Internal Medicine Residency Program, Houston, TX USA
| | - Neda Heshami
- The University of Texas at Houston Internal Medicine Residency Program, Houston, TX USA
| | - Chouhan Jay
- The University of Texas at Houston Internal Medicine Residency Program, Houston, TX USA
| | - Naveen Ramesh
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston, Houston, TX USA
| | - Juhee Song
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Xiudong Lei
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Erfe Jean Rose
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Kristen Carter
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd # 450, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Dejka M Araujo
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd # 450, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Robert S Benjamin
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd # 450, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd # 450, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd # 450, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hoffmann MS, Overman MJ, Nates JL. Acute benzodiazepine toxicity exacerbated by concomitant oral olanzapine. J Community Support Oncol 2016; 14:178-9. [PMID: 27152518 DOI: 10.12788/jcso.0187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Improvements in antiemetic therapy constitute a major advance in oncology. A recent poll of the oncology community by the American Society of Clinical Oncology ranked it as one of the top 5 advances in cancer in the last 50 years. Emetogenicity of chemotherapy is defined by risk of emesis in the patient given no antiemetics; high-risk regimens cause nausea and vomiting in >90% of patients, moderate risk in 30%-90%, and low risk in <30%. This risk profile serves as the basis for empiric antiemetic prophylaxis and offers alternatives to refractory patients. Modern antiemetic prophylaxis is extremely effective for high-risk chemotherapy, reducing the risk for breakthrough nausea and vomiting to 0%-13% in the acute setting (<24 hours from receipt of chemotherapy) and to 25%-30% in the delayed setting (24-72 hours from receipt of chemotherapy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc S Hoffmann
- University of Kansas Cancer Center, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
| | - Michael J Overman
- Department of Cancer Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Joseph L Nates
- Department of Critical Care, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Blanch L, Abillama FF, Amin P, Christian M, Joynt GM, Myburgh J, Nates JL, Pelosi P, Sprung C, Topeli A, Vincent JL, Yeager S, Zimmerman J. Triage decisions for ICU admission: Report from the Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care 2016; 36:301-305. [PMID: 27387663 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Demand for intensive care unit (ICU) resources often exceeds supply, and shortages of ICU beds and staff are likely to persist. Triage requires careful weighing of the benefits and risks involved in ICU admission while striving to guarantee fair distribution of available resources. We must ensure that the patients who occupy ICU beds are those most likely to benefit from the ICU's specialized technology and professionals. Although prognosticating is not an exact science, preference should be given to patients who are more likely to survive if admitted to the ICU but unlikely to survive or likely to have more significant morbidity if not admitted. To provide general guidance for intensivists in ICU triage decisions, a task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine addressed 4 basic questions regarding this process. The team made recommendations and concluded that triage should be led by intensivists considering input from nurses, emergency medicine professionals, hospitalists, surgeons, and allied professionals. Triage algorithms and protocols can be useful but can never supplant the role of skilled intensivists basing their decisions on input from multidisciplinary teams. Infrastructures need to be organized efficiently both within individual hospitals and at the regional level. When resources are critically limited, patients may be refused ICU admission if others may benefit more on the basis of the principle of distributive justice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lluís Blanch
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERes, Parc Taulí Hospital, Sabadell, Spain.
| | | | - Pravin Amin
- Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Gavin M Joynt
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
| | | | - Joseph L Nates
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Charles Sprung
- Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bayraktar UD, Nates JL. Intensive care outcomes in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. World J Clin Oncol 2016; 7:98-105. [PMID: 26862493 PMCID: PMC4734941 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i1.98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Revised: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Although outcomes of intensive care for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have improved in the last two decades, the short-term mortality still remains above 50% among allogeneic HSCT patients. Better selection of HSCT patients for intensive care, and consequently reduction of non-beneficial care, may reduce financial costs and alleviate patient suffering. We reviewed the studies on intensive care outcomes of patients undergoing HSCT published since 2000. The risk factors for intensive care unit (ICU) admission identified in this report were primarily patient and transplant related: HSCT type (autologous vs allogeneic), conditioning intensity, HLA mismatch, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). At the same time, most of the factors associated with ICU outcomes reported were related to the patients’ functional status upon development of critical illness and interventions in ICU. Among the many possible interventions, the initiation of mechanical ventilation was the most consistently reported factor affecting ICU survival. As a consequence, our current ability to assess the benefit or futility of intensive care is limited. Until better ICU or hospital mortality prediction models are available, based on the available evidence, we recommend practitioners to base their ICU admission decisions on: Patient pre-transplant comorbidities, underlying disease status, GVHD diagnosis/grade, and patients’ functional status at the time of critical illness.
Collapse
|
48
|
Singh P, Idowu O, Malik I, Nates JL. Acute Respiratory Failure Induced by Magnesium Replacement in a 62-Year-Old Woman with Myasthenia Gravis. Tex Heart Inst J 2015; 42:495-7. [PMID: 26504451 DOI: 10.14503/thij-14-4584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Magnesium is known to act at the neuromuscular junction by inhibiting the presynaptic release of acetylcholine and desensitizing the postsynaptic membrane. Because of these effects, magnesium has been postulated to potentiate neuromuscular weakness. We describe the case of a 62-year-old woman with myasthenia gravis and a metastatic thymoma who was admitted to our intensive care unit for management of a myasthenic crisis. The patient's neuromuscular weakness worsened in association with standard intravenous magnesium replacement, and the exacerbated respiratory failure necessitated intubation, mechanical ventilation, and an extended stay in the intensive care unit. The effect of magnesium replacement on myasthenia gravis patients has not been well documented, and we present this case to increase awareness and stimulate research. In addition, we discuss the relevant medical literature.
Collapse
|
49
|
Patel RP, Canada TW, Nates JL. Bleeding Associated With Feeding Tube Placement in Critically Ill Oncology Patients With Thrombocytopenia. Nutr Clin Pract 2015; 31:111-5. [DOI: 10.1177/0884533615598964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rina P. Patel
- Division of Pharmacy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Todd W. Canada
- Division of Pharmacy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph L. Nates
- Department of Critical Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Berner DK, Terrell JA, Bernhard SL, Layton LS, Nates JL. Reducing time from acceptance to intensive care unit arrival. J Crit Care 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|