1
|
Thompson A, Fleischmann KE, Smilowitz NR, de Las Fuentes L, Mukherjee D, Aggarwal NR, Ahmad FS, Allen RB, Altin SE, Auerbach A, Berger JS, Chow B, Dakik HA, Eisenstein EL, Gerhard-Herman M, Ghadimi K, Kachulis B, Leclerc J, Lee CS, Macaulay TE, Mates G, Merli GJ, Parwani P, Poole JE, Rich MW, Ruetzler K, Stain SC, Sweitzer B, Talbot AW, Vallabhajosyula S, Whittle J, Williams KA. 2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2024; 150:e351-e442. [PMID: 39316661 DOI: 10.1161/cir.0000000000001285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM The "2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from August 2022 to March 2023 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE Recommendations from the "2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery" have been updated with new evidence consolidated to guide clinicians; clinicians should be advised this guideline supersedes the previously published 2014 guideline. In addition, evidence-based management strategies, including pharmacological therapies, perioperative monitoring, and devices, for cardiovascular disease and associated medical conditions, have been developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lisa de Las Fuentes
- Former ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines member; current member during the writing effort
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin Chow
- Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Purvi Parwani
- Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance representative
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thompson A, Fleischmann KE, Smilowitz NR, de Las Fuentes L, Mukherjee D, Aggarwal NR, Ahmad FS, Allen RB, Altin SE, Auerbach A, Berger JS, Chow B, Dakik HA, Eisenstein EL, Gerhard-Herman M, Ghadimi K, Kachulis B, Leclerc J, Lee CS, Macaulay TE, Mates G, Merli GJ, Parwani P, Poole JE, Rich MW, Ruetzler K, Stain SC, Sweitzer B, Talbot AW, Vallabhajosyula S, Whittle J, Williams KA. 2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 84:1869-1969. [PMID: 39320289 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
AIM The "2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for Perioperative Cardiovascular Management for Noncardiac Surgery" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of adult patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted from August 2022 to March 2023 to identify clinical studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. STRUCTURE Recommendations from the "2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery" have been updated with new evidence consolidated to guide clinicians; clinicians should be advised this guideline supersedes the previously published 2014 guideline. In addition, evidence-based management strategies, including pharmacological therapies, perioperative monitoring, and devices, for cardiovascular disease and associated medical conditions, have been developed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tol JTM, Terwindt LE, Rellum SR, Wijnberge M, van der Ster BJP, Kho E, Hollmann MW, Vlaar APJ, Veelo DP, Schenk J. Performance of a Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension in Spontaneously Breathing Non-Ventilated Post-Anesthesia and ICU Patients. J Pers Med 2024; 14:210. [PMID: 38392643 PMCID: PMC10890176 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Hypotension is common in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and intensive care unit (ICU), and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. The Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI) algorithm has been shown to accurately predict hypotension in mechanically ventilated patients in the OR and ICU and to reduce intraoperative hypotension (IOH). Since positive pressure ventilation significantly affects patient hemodynamics, we performed this validation study to examine the performance of the HPI algorithm in a non-ventilated PACU and ICU population. Materials & Methods: The performance of the HPI algorithm was assessed using prospectively collected blood pressure (BP) and HPI data from a PACU and a mixed ICU population. Recordings with sufficient time (≥3 h) spent without mechanical ventilation were selected using data from the electronic medical record. All HPI values were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and time-to-event, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. Results: BP and HPI data from 282 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 242 (86%) were ICU patients. The mean age (standard deviation) was 63 (13.5) years, and 186 (66%) of the patients were male. Overall, the HPI predicted hypotension accurately, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94. The most used HPI threshold cutoff in research and clinical use, 85, showed a sensitivity of 1.00, specificity of 0.79, median time-to-event of 160 s [60-380], PPV of 0.85, and NPV of 1.00. Conclusion: The absence of positive pressure ventilation and the influence thereof on patient hemodynamics does not negatively affect the performance of the HPI algorithm in predicting hypotension in the PACU and ICU. Future research should evaluate the feasibility and influence on hypotension and outcomes following HPI implementation in non-ventilated patients at risk of hypotension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan T M Tol
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte E Terwindt
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Santino R Rellum
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Wijnberge
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Björn J P van der Ster
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Kho
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Markus W Hollmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center Location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander P J Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center Location, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise P Veelo
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jimmy Schenk
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ooms M, Schooß R, Winnand P, Heitzer M, Hölzle F, Bickenbach J, Rieg A, Modabber A. Influence of perioperative blood pressure regulation on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:365. [PMID: 37736691 PMCID: PMC10514994 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01367-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative delirium (POD) is a serious complication in patients undergoing microvascular head and neck reconstruction. Whether intraoperative and postoperative blood pressure regulation are risk factors for POD remains unclear. This study aimed to highlight the relationships between intraoperative and postoperative blood pressure regulation and POD in microvascular head and neck reconstruction. METHODS Data from 433 patients who underwent microvascular head and neck reconstruction at our department of oral and maxillofacial surgery between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The 55 patients with POD were matched with 55 patients without POD in terms of tracheotomy, flap type, and flap location, and the intraoperative and postoperative systolic and mean blood pressure values were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Patients with POD showed lower intraoperative and postoperative minimum mean arterial pressure (MAP) values than patients without POD (60.0 mmHg vs. 65.0 mmHg, p < 0.001; and 56.0 mmHg vs. 62.0 mmHg, p < 0.001; respectively). A lower intraoperative minimum MAP value was identified as predictor for POD (odds ratio [OR] 1.246, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.057-1.472, p = 0.009). The cut-off value for intraoperative MAP for predicting POD was ≤ 62.5 mmHg (area under the curve [AUC] 0.822, 95% CI 0.744-0.900, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Maintaining a stable intraoperative minimum MAP of > 62.5 mmHg could help to reduce the incidence of POD in microvascular head and neck reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ooms
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Ruth Schooß
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Winnand
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marius Heitzer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Frank Hölzle
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Johannes Bickenbach
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Annette Rieg
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ali Modabber
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rajkumar KP, Hicks MH, Marchant B, Khanna AK. Blood Pressure Goals in Critically Ill Patients. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2023; 19:24-37. [PMID: 37547901 PMCID: PMC10402811 DOI: 10.14797/mdcvj.1260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Blood pressure goals in the intensive care unit (ICU) have been extensively investigated in large datasets and have been associated with various harm thresholds at or greater than a mean pressure of 65 mm Hg. While it is difficult to perform interventional randomized trials of blood pressure in the ICU, important evidence does not support defense of a higher pressure, except in retrospective database analyses. Perfusion pressure may be a more important target than mean pressure, even more so in the vulnerable patient population. In the cardiac ICU, blood pressure targets are tailored to specific cardiac pathophysiology and patient characteristics. Generally, the goal is to maintain adequate blood pressure within a certain range to support cardiac function and to ensure end organ perfusion. Individualized targets demand the use of both invasive and noninvasive monitoring modalities and frequent titration of medications and/or mechanical circulatory support where necessary. In this review, we aim to identify appropriate blood pressure targets in the ICU, recognizing special patient populations and outlining the risk factors and predictors of end organ failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karuna Puttur Rajkumar
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US
| | - Megan Henley Hicks
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US
| | - Bryan Marchant
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US
| | - Ashish K. Khanna
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, US
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, US
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Creagh-Brown B, Wunsch H, Martin P, Harlet P, Forni L, Moonesinghe SR, Jammer I. The incidence of postoperative vasopressor usage: protocol for a prospective international observational cohort study (SQUEEZE). Perioper Med (Lond) 2023; 12:8. [PMID: 36964590 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00296-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative hypotension is common after major non-cardiac surgery, due predominantly to vasodilation. Administration of infused vasopressors postoperatively may often be considered a surrogate indicator of vasodilation. The incidence of postoperative vasopressors has never been described for non-cardiac surgery, nor have outcomes associated with their use. This paper presents a protocol for a prospective international cohort study to address these gaps in knowledge. The primary objectives are to estimate the proportion of patients who receive postoperative vasopressor infusions (PVI) and to document the variation in this proportion between hospitals and internationally. Furthermore, we will identify factors in variation of care (patient, condition, surgery, and intraoperative management) associated with receipt of PVI and investigate how PVI use is associated with patient outcomes, including organ dysfunction, length of hospital stay, and 30-day in-hospital mortality. METHOD This will be a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study that includes all adult (≥ 18 years) non-cardiac surgical patients in participating centres. Patients undergoing cardiac, obstetric, or day-case surgery will be excluded. We will recruit two cohorts of patients: cohort A will include all eligible patients admitted to participating hospitals for seven consecutive days. Cohort B will include 30 sequential patients per hospital, with the single additional inclusion criterion of postoperative vasopressor usage. We expect to collect data on approximately 40,000 patients for cohort A and 12,800 patients for cohort B. DISCUSSION While in cardiac surgery, clinical trials have informed the choice of vasopressors used to treat postoperative vasoplegia; there remains equipoise over the best approach in non-cardiac surgery. Our study will represent the first large-scale assessment of the use of vasopressors after non-cardiac surgery. These data will inform future studies, including trials of different vasopressors and potential management options to improve outcomes and reduce resource use after surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03805230, 15 January 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Creagh-Brown
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Hannah Wunsch
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Martin
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Pierre Harlet
- European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lui Forni
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - S Ramani Moonesinghe
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ib Jammer
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Song Q, Li J, Jiang Z. Provisional Decision-Making for Perioperative Blood Pressure Management: A Narrative Review. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2022; 2022:5916040. [PMID: 35860431 PMCID: PMC9293529 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5916040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Blood pressure (BP) is a basic determinant for organ blood flow supply. Insufficient blood supply will cause tissue hypoxia, provoke cellular oxidative stress, and to some extent lead to organ injury. Perioperative BP is labile and dynamic, and intraoperative hypotension is common. It is unclear whether there is a causal relationship between intraoperative hypotension and organ injury. However, hypotension surely compromises perfusion and causes harm to some extent. Because the harm threshold remains unknown, various guidelines for intraoperative BP management have been proposed. With the pending definitions from robust randomized trials, it is reasonable to consider observational analyses suggesting that mean arterial pressures below 65 mmHg sustained for more than 15 minutes are associated with myocardial and renal injury. Advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence may facilitate the management of hemodynamics globally, including fluid administration, rather than BP alone. The previous mounting studies concentrated on associations between BP targets and adverse complications, whereas few studies were concerned about how to treat and multiple factors for decision-making. Hence, in this narrative review, we discussed the way of BP measurement and current knowledge about baseline BP extracting for surgical patients, highlighted the decision-making process for BP management with a view to providing pragmatic guidance for BP treatment in the clinical settings, and evaluated the merits of an automated blood control system in predicting hypotension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiliang Song
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000 Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jipeng Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000 Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zongming Jiang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000 Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|