A Comprehensive Analysis of Liver Transplantation Outcomes Among Ethnic Minorities in the United States

Racial disparities in posttransplant outcomes among recipients undergoing simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage cirrhosis may experience renal dysfunction, necessitating a simultaneous kidney-liver transplant (SKLT). Guidelines have been put forth by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to streamline the SKLT allocation process and ensure equitable access to transplantation. However, there is a scarcity of literature on racial and ethnic disparities in post-SKLT outcomes.

METHODS

The UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research Database was queried from 2005 to 2019 to study SKLT patients. Patients were stratified by race: White (reference group) recipients (n = 3513), Black recipients (n = 859), Hispanic recipients (n = 964), Asian recipients (n = 206), and other recipients (n = 85). Primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and graft failure while secondary endpoints were specific causes of death.

RESULTS

Hispanic recipients had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.93, P = 0.003), while Black recipients had a significantly increased risk of graft failure compared to Whites (aHR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.16-2.30, P = 0.005). Evaluation of specific causes of recipient death revealed a higher risk of death due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage among Blacks (aHR: 4.16, 95% CI: 1.04-16.68, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study findings show Black patients experience higher rates of graft failure compared to White counterparts. The reasons for these disparities are not fully understood but likely a combination of biological and social factors. Further investigation is warranted to ascertain the specific factors influencing these outcomes.

Changing landscape of alcohol-associated liver disease in younger individuals, women, and ethnic minorities

Alcohol use is the most important determinant of the development of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) and of predicting long-term outcomes in those with established liver disease. Worldwide, the amount, type, and pattern of use of alcohol vary. Alcohol use and consequent liver disease have been increasing in certain ethnic groups especially Hispanics and Native Americans, likely due to variations in genetics, cultural background, socio-economic status, and access to health care. Furthermore, the magnitude and burden of ALD have been increasing especially in the last few years among females and young adults who are at the prime of their productivity. It is critical to recognize the problem and care for these patients integrating cultural aspects in liver clinics. At the federal level, a societal approach is needed with the implementation of public health policies aiming to reduce alcohol consumption in the community. By addressing these challenges and promoting awareness, we can strive to reduce the burden of ALD, especially in high-risk demographic groups to improve their long-term health outcomes. Finally, we need studies and quality research examining these changing landscapes of demographics in ALD as a basis for developing therapeutic targets and interventions to reduce harmful drinking behaviours in these high-risk demographic groups.

Donor-recipient race-ethnicity concordance and patient survival after liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the association between patient survival after liver transplantation (LT) and donor-recipient race-ethnicity (R/E) concordance.

METHODS

The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) was retrospectively analyzed using data collected between 2002 and 2019. Only adults without history of prior organ transplant and recipients of LT alone were included. The primary outcome was patient survival. Donors and recipients were categorized into five R/E groups: White/Caucasian, African American/Black, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, and Others. Statistical analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox Proportional Hazards models, adjusting for donor and recipient covariates.

RESULTS

85,427 patients were included. Among all the R/E groups, Asian patients had the highest 5-year survival (81.3%; 95% CI = 79.9-82.7), while African American/Black patients had the lowest (71.4%; 95% CI = 70.3-72.6) (P < 0.001). Lower survival rates were observed in recipients who received discordant R/E grafts irrespective of their R/E group. The fully adjusted hazard ratio for death was statistically significant in African American/Black (aHR 1.07-1.18-1.31; P < 0.01) and in White∕Caucasian patients (aHR 1.00-1.04-1.07; P = 0.03) in the presence of donor-recipient R/E discordance.

CONCLUSION

Disparities in post-LT outcomes might be influenced by biological factors in addition to well-known social determinants of health.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-associated Liver Diseases in the United States

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest disparities exist in liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). As the incidence of ALD increases, we aimed to characterize recent trends in ALD LT frequency and outcomes, including racial and ethnic disparities.

METHODS

Using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data (2015 through 2021), we evaluated LT frequency, waitlist mortality, and graft survival among US adults with ALD (alcohol-associated hepatitis [AH] and alcohol-associated cirrhosis [AAC]) stratified by race and ethnicity. We used adjusted competing-risk regression analysis to evaluate waitlist outcomes, Kaplan-Meier analysis to illustrate graft survival, and Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft survival.

RESULTS

There were 1211 AH and 26 526 AAC new LT waitlist additions, with 970 AH and 15 522 AAC LTs performed. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients (NHWs) with AAC, higher hazards of waitlist death were observed for Hispanic (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.32), Asian (SHR = 1.22, 95% CI:1. 01-1.47), and American Indian/Alaskan Native (SHR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.76) candidates. Similarly, significantly higher graft failures were observed in non-Hispanic Black (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09-1.61) and American Indian/Alaskan Native (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.15-2.38) patients with AAC than NHWs. We did not observe differences in waitlist or post-LT outcomes by race or ethnicity in AH, although analyses were limited by small subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist for ALD LT frequency and outcomes in the United States. Compared with NHWs, racial and ethnic minorities with AAC experience increased risk of waitlist mortality and graft failure. Efforts are needed to identify determinants for LT disparities in ALD that can inform intervention strategies.

Benefit and harm of waiting time in liver transplantation for HCC

Liver transplantation is the most successful treatment for limited-stage HCC. The waiting time for liver transplantation (LT) can be a critical factor affecting the oncological prognosis and outcome of patients with HCC. Efficient strategies to optimize waiting time are essential to maximize the benefits of LT and to reduce the harm of delay in transplantation. The ever-increasing demand for donor livers emphasizes the need to improve the organization of the waiting list for transplantation and to optimize organ availability for patients with and without HCC. Current progress in innovations to expand the donor pool includes the implementation of living donor LT and the use of grafts from extended donors. By expanding selection criteria, an increased number of patients are eligible for transplantation, which necessitates criteria to prevent futile transplantations. Thus, the selection criteria for LT have evolved to include not only tumor characteristics but biomarkers as well. Enhancing our understanding of HCC tumor biology through the analysis of subtypes and molecular genetics holds significant promise in advancing the personalized approach for patients. In this review, the effect of waiting time duration on outcome in patients with HCC enlisted for LT is discussed.

Actionable Solutions to Achieve Health Equity in Chronic Liver Disease

There are well-described racial and ethnic disparities in the burden of chronic liver diseases. Hispanic persons are at highest risk for developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, the fastest growing cause of liver disease. Hepatitis B disproportionately affects persons of Asian or African descent. The highest rates of hepatitis C occur in American Indian and Alaskan Native populations. In addition to disparities in disease burden, there are also marked racial and ethnic disparities in access to treatments, including liver transplantation. Disparities also exist by gender and geography, especially in alcohol-related liver disease. To achieve health equity, we must address the root causes that drive these inequities. Understanding the role that social determinants of health play in the disparate health outcomes that are currently observed is critically important. We must forge and/or strengthen collaborations between patients, community members, other key stakeholders, health care providers, health care institutions, professional societies, and legislative bodies. Herein, we provide a high-level review of current disparities in chronic liver disease and describe actionable strategies that have potential to bridge gaps, improve quality, and promote equity in liver care.

Days alive and out of hospital after liver transplant: comparing a patient-centered outcome between recipients of grafts from donation after circulatory and brain deaths

We retrospectively compared outcomes between recipients of donation after circulatory death (DCD) and donation after brain death (DBD) liver allografts using days alive and out of hospital (DAOH), a composite outcome of mortality, morbidity, and burden of care from patient perspective. The initial length of stay and duration of any subsequent readmission for the first year after liver transplantation were recorded. Donor category and perioperative and intraoperative characteristics pertinent to liver transplantation were included. The primary outcome was DAOH₃₆₅. Secondary outcomes included early allograft dysfunction and hepatic arterial and biliary complications. Although the incidence of both early allograft dysfunction (P < .001) and ischemic cholangiopathy (P < .001) was significantly greater in the recipients of DCD, there were no significant differences in the length of stay and DAOH₃₆₅. The median DAOH₃₆₅ was 355 days for recipients of DBD allografts and 353 days for recipients of DCD allografts (P = .34). Increased transfusion burden, longer cold ischemic time, and non-White recipients were associated with decreased DAOH. There were no significant differences in graft failure (P = .67), retransplantation (P = .67), or 1-year mortality (P = .96) between the 2 groups. DAOH is a practical and attainable measure of outcome after liver transplantation. This metric should be considered for quality measurement and reporting in liver transplantation.

Associations between social determinants of health and abdominal solid organ transplant wait-lists in the United States

BACKGROUND

Societal factors that influence wait-listing for transplantation are complex and poorly understood. Social determinants of health (SDOH) affect rates of and outcomes after transplantation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study investigated the impact of SDOH on additions to state-level, 2017-2018 kidney and liver wait-lists. Principal components analysis, starting with 127 variables among 3142 counties, was used to derive novel, comprehensive state-level composites, designated (1) health/economics and (2) community capital/urbanicity. Stepwise multivariate linear regression with backwards elimination (n = 51; 50 states and DC) tested the effects of these composites, Medicaid expansion, and center density on adult disease burden-adjusted wait-list additions.

RESULTS

SDOH related to increased community capital/urbanicity were independently associated with wait-listing (starting models: B = .40, P = .010 Kidney; B = .36, P = .038 Liver) (final models: B = .31, P = .027 Kidney, B = .34, P = .015 Liver). In contrast and surprisingly, no other covariates were associated with wait-listing (P ≥ .122).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that deficits in community resources are important contributors to disparities in wait-list access. Our composite SDOH metrics may help identify at-risk communities, which can be the focus of local and national policy initiatives to improve access to organ transplantation.

Predictors of patient survival following liver transplant in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the second-leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide and is projected to become the leading indication. Our study aimed to determine clinical variables that predict post-LT survival in NASH.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. On June 18, 2020 and April 28, 2022, Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. No date limits were applied. Inclusion criteria specified the type of study and our study's population/comparison and outcome/timepoints. Pediatric, animal, retransplantation-only, and studies classifying cryptogenic cirrhosis patients with body mass index (BMI) <30 as NASH were excluded. Studies with duplicate cohorts and missing information were excluded from the meta-analysis. Studies were appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This study was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42020196915).

FINDINGS

Out of 8583 studies identified, 25 studies were included in the systematic review, while 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our quantitative review suggested that the following variables were predictive of post-LT NASH patient survival: recipient age, functional status, pre-LT hepatoma, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, diabetes mellitus (DM), pre-LT dialysis, hepatic encephalopathy, portal vein thrombosis, hospitalization/ICU at LT, and year of LT. Predictors of graft survival included recipient age, BMI, pre-LT dialysis, and DM. Our pooled meta-analyses included five predictors of patient survival. Increased patient mortality was associated with older recipient age (HR=2·07, 95%CI: 1·71-2·50, I²=0, τ²=0, p=0·40) and pretransplant DM (HR=1·18, 95%CI: 1·08-1·28, I²=0, τ²=0, p=0·76).

INTERPRETATION

Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise predictive variables of mortality in LT NASH patients. Clinically, this might help to identify modifiable risk factors that can be optimized in the post-transplant setting to improve patient outcomes and optimises decision making in the resource-limited LT setting.

FUNDING

Toronto General and Western Hospital Foundation.

The Burden of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology Studies

Background and Aims

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with increased mortality and risk of complications but is often asymptomatic and under-recognized. A systematic review of NASH epidemiology was conducted to provide information on the burden of NASH and highlight important evidence gaps for future research.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English-language publications published from 2010 to January 2022 that reported on natural history, risk factors, comorbidities, and complications of a NASH population or subpopulation.

Results

Overall, 173 publications were included. NASH was shown to have a variable disease course and high prevalence of comorbid disease. Although many patients progressed to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, disease regression or resolution was reported in up to half of patients in some studies. Reported risk factors for disease progression or resolution included levels of (or changes in) serum fibrosis markers, liver enzymes, and platelets. The presence of NASH increased the risk of liver cirrhosis and other serious diseases such as hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. In 2017, NASH was responsible for ∼118,000 cirrhosis deaths globally, and an increasing proportion of patients are receiving liver transplantation for NASH in Europe and the United States. Consolidation of data was hampered by heterogeneity across the studies in terms of patient populations, follow-up time, and outcomes measured.

Conclusion

NASH is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, an increased risk of comorbidities, and imposes an increasing burden among liver transplantation recipients. Longer studies with harmonized study criteria are required to better understand the impact of NASH on patient outcomes.

Significant improvements, but consistent disparities in survival for African Americans after liver transplantation

Despite improvements in survival across races in the past 20 years, African Americans have worse liver transplant outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This study aims at quantifying the change in disparities between African Americans and other races in survival after OLT. We retrospectively analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for patient data for candidates who received a liver transplant between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2017. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression indicated similar decreases in mortality over time for each race with a decrease in mortality for African Americans: 2010-2012 (HR = .930), 2012-2015 (HR = .882), and 2015-2017 (HR = .883) when compared to 2007-2010. Risk of mortality for African Americans compared to Caucasians varied across the 4 eras: 2007-2010 (HR = 1.083), 2010-2012 (HR = 1.090), 2012-2015 (HR = 1.070), and 2015-2017 (HR = 1.125). While African Americans have seen increases in survival in the past decade, a similar increase in survival for other races leaves a significant survival disparity in African Americans.

An Analysis of Free-Text Refusals as an Indicator of Readiness to Accept Organ Offers in Liver Transplantation

Racial/ethnic minorities experience higher rates of wait-list mortality and longer waiting times on the liver transplant wait list. We hypothesized that racial/ethnic minorities may encounter greater logistical barriers to maintaining "readiness" on the wait list, as reflected in offer nonacceptance. We identified all candidates who received an organ offer between 2009 and 2018 and investigated candidates who did not accept an organ offer using a free-text refusal reason associated with refusal code 801. We isolated patients who did not accept an organ offer due to "candidate-related logistical reasons" and evaluated their characteristics. We isolated 94,006 "no 801" patients and 677 "with 801 logistical" patients. Common reasons for offer decline among the 677 were 60% "unable to travel/distance," 22% "cannot be contacted," 13% "not ready/unspecified," and 5% "financial/insurance." Compared to "no 801," "with 801 logistical" patients were more likely to be Hispanic (19% vs. 15%, P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic modeling showed Hispanic (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.76, P < 0.01) and multiracial/other ethnicity (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.08-3.05, P = 0.02) were associated with "with 801 logistical" status. The "with 801 logistical" patients were listed with higher allocation (inclusive of exception points) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (16 vs. 15, P < 0.01) and remained longer on the wait list (median 428 days vs. 187 days, P < 0.01). Conclusion: In this analysis of wait-list candidates, we isolated 677 patients who declined an organ offer with a free-text reason consistent with a "candidate-related logistical reason." Compared with non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics were at 1.44 odds of not accepting organ offers due to logistical reasons. These limited findings motivate further research into interventions that would improve candidates' "readiness" to accept organ offers and may benefit racial/ethnic minorities on the liver-transplantation wait list.

A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States

BACKGROUND

Organ transplant is the preferred treatment for end-stage organ disease, yet the majority of patients with end-stage organ disease are never placed on the transplant waiting list. Limited access to the transplant waiting list combined with the scarcity of the organ pool result in over 100,000 deaths annually in the United States. Patients face unique barriers to referral and acceptance for organ transplant based on social determinants of health, and patients from disenfranchised groups suffer from disproportionately lower rates of transplantation. Our objective was to review the literature describing disparities in access to organ transplantation based on social determinants of health to integrate the existing knowledge and guide future research.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature reporting disparities in access to heart, lung, liver, pancreas and kidney transplantation based on social determinants of health (race, income, education, geography, insurance status, health literacy and engagement). Included studies were categorized based on steps along the transplant care continuum: referral for transplant, transplant evaluation and selection, living donor identification/evaluation, and waitlist outcomes.

RESULTS

Our search generated 16,643 studies, of which 227 were included in our final review. Of these, 34 focused on disparities in referral for transplantation among patients with chronic organ disease, 82 on transplant selection processes, 50 on living donors, and 61 on waitlist management. In total, 15 studies involved the thoracic organs (heart, lung), 209 involved the abdominal organs (kidney, liver, pancreas), and three involved multiple organs. Racial and ethnic minorities, women, and patients in lower socioeconomic status groups were less likely to be referred, evaluated, and added to the waiting list for organ transplant. The quality of the data describing these disparities across the transplant literature was variable and overwhelmingly focused on kidney transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

This review contextualizes the quality of the data, identifies seminal work by organ, and reports gaps in the literature where future research on disparities in organ transplantation should focus. Future work should investigate the association of social determinants of health with access to the organ transplant waiting list, with a focus on prospective analyses that assess interventions to improve health equity.

Waitlist mortality and transplant free survival in Hispanic patients listed for liver transplant using the UNOS database

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

After the implementation of "Share 35", several concerns arose such as the potential to increase travel distance, costs, and decreased liver availability. These elements could have a negative impact on waitlist outcomes among ethnic minorities. We aimed to determine waitlist survival after the implementation of the Share 35 policy in non-Hispanic white and Hispanic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics who were listed for liver transplantation from June 18th, 2013 to June 18, 2018. We excluded pediatric patients, patients with acute hepatic necrosis, re-transplants, multiorgan transplant, living donor, and exception cases. The primary outcome was death or removal from the waitlist due to clinical deterioration. We used competing risk analysis to compare waitlist survival between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 23,340 non-Hispanic whites and 4938 Hispanics listed for transplant. On competing risk analysis, Hispanic patients had a higher risk of being removed from the waitlist for death or clinical deterioration compared to their counterpart (SHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.34; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After the implementation of Share 35, disparities are still present and continue to negatively impact outcomes in minority populations especially Hispanic patients.

Medicaid Expansion Association With End-Stage Liver Disease Mortality Depends on Leniency of Medicaid Hepatitis C Virus Coverage

The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid around the same time that direct-acting antivirals became widely available for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, there is significant variation in Medicaid HCV treatment eligibility criteria between states. We explored the combined effects of Medicaid expansion and leniency of HCV coverage under Medicaid on liver outcomes. We assessed state-level end-stage liver disease (ESLD) mortality rates, listings for liver transplantation (LT), and listing-to-death ratios (LDRs) for adults aged 25 to 64 years using data from United Network for Organ Sharing and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research. States were divided into 4 nonoverlapping groups based on expansion status on January 1, 2014 (expansion versus nonexpansion) and leniency of Medicaid HCV coverage (lenient versus restrictive coverage). Joinpoint regression analysis evaluated the significant changes in slope over time (joinpoints) during the pre-expansion (2009-2013) and postexpansion (2014-2018) time periods. We found significant changes in the annual percent change for population-adjusted ESLD deaths between 2014 and 2015 in all cohorts except for the nonexpansion/restrictive cohort, in which deaths increased at the same annual percent change from 2009 to 2018 (annual percent change of +2.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3.3]). In the expansion/lenient coverage cohort, deaths increased at an annual percent change of +2.6% (95% CI, 1.8-3.5) until 2014 and then tended to decrease at an annual percent change of -0.4% (95% CI, -1.5 to 0.8). LT listings tended to decrease over time for all cohorts. For LDRs, only the expansion/lenient and expansion/restrictive cohorts had statistically significant joinpoints. Improvements in ESLD mortality and LDRs were associated with both Medicaid expansion and leniency of HCV coverage under Medicaid. These findings suggest the importance of implementing more lenient and widespread public health insurance to improve liver disease outcomes, including mortality.

The influence of equitable access policies and socioeconomic factors on post-liver transplant survival

BACKGROUND

Survival following liver transplant (LT) is influenced by a variety of factors, including donor risk factors and recipient disease burden and co-morbidities. It is difficult to separate these effects from those of socioeconomic factors, such as income or insurance. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) created equitable access policies, such as Share 35, to ensure that organs are distributed to individuals with greatest medical need; however, the effect of Share 35 on disparities in post-LT survival is not clear. This study aimed to (1) characterize associations between post-transplant survival and race and ethnicity, income, insurance, and citizenship status, when adjusted for other clinical and demographic factors that may influence survival, and (2) determine if the direction of associations changed after Share 35.

METHODS

A retrospective, cohort study of adult LT recipients (n = 83,254) from the UNOS database from 2005 to 2019 was conducted. Kaplan-Meier survival graphs and stepwise multivariate cox-regression analyses were performed to characterize the effects of socioeconomic status on post-LT survival, adjusted for recipient and donor characteristics, across the time period and after Share 35.

FINDINGS

Male sex (HR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96)), private insurance (0.91 (0.88-0.94)), income (0.82 (0.79-0.85)), U.S. citizenship, and Asian (0.81 (0.75-0.88)) or Hispanic (0.82 (0.79-0.86)) race and ethnicity were associated with higher post-transplant survival, after adjustment for clinical and demographic factors (Table 3). These associations were found across the entire time period studied and many persisted after the implementation of Share 35 in 2013 (Table 3; male sex (0.84 (0.79-0.90)), private insurance (0.94 (0.89-1.00)), income (0.82 (0.77-0.89)), and Asian (0.87 (0.73-1.02)) or Hispanic (0.88 (0.81-0.96)) race and ethnicity).

INTERPRETATION

Recipients' socioeconomic factors at time of transplant may impact long-term post-transplant survival, and a single policy may not significantly alter these structural health inequalities.

FUNDING

None.

Access to liver transplantation for minority populations in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Racial disparities in access to liver transplantation have been known since the National Transplant Act of 1980. Since the inception of the Final Rule in 2000, the United Network of Organ Sharing has sought to ensure the equitable distribution of donor livers. Despite several measures aimed to improve access for vulnerable populations, disparities in outcomes are still prevalent throughout the liver transplant (LT) evaluation, while on the waitlist, and after liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented on the LT list and have an increased waitlist mortality rate compared to Whites. Additionally, Blacks have a significantly higher risk of posttransplant mortality.

SUMMARY

Ongoing efforts are necessary to eliminate inequities in transplant access. Strategies such as policy implementation and increasing diversity in the healthcare workforce may prove efficacious in creating change.

Waitlist Mortality and Posttransplant Outcomes in African Americans with Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Background

Liver transplantation is indicated in end-stage liver disease due to autoimmune diseases. The liver allocation system can be affected by disparities such as decreased liver transplant referrals for racial minorities, especially African Americans that negatively impact the pre- and posttransplant outcomes.

Aim

To determine differences in waitlist survival and posttransplant graft survival rates between African American and Caucasian patients with autoimmune liver diseases. Study. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was used to identify all patients with autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis who underwent liver transplant from 1988 to 2019. We compared waitlist survival and posttransplant graft survival between Caucasians and African Americans using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression models. We also evaluated the cumulative incidence of death or delisting for deterioration and posttransplant incidence of death and retransplantation using competing risk analysis.

Results

African Americans were more likely to be removed from the waitlist for death or clinical deterioration (subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 1.26, 95% CI 1–1.58, P=0.046) using competing risk analysis. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was no difference in posttransplant graft survival among the two groups (hazard ratio (HR) 1.10, 95% CI 0.98–1.23, P=0.081).

Conclusions

Despite the current efforts to reduce racial disparities, we found that African Americans are more likely to die on the waitlist for liver transplant and are less likely to be transplanted, with no differences in graft survival rates. The persistence of healthcare disparities continues to negatively impact African Americans.

A Review of the Current State of Liver Transplantation Disparities

Equity in access is one of the core goals of the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN). However, disparities in liver transplantation have been described since the passage of the National Organ Transplant Act, which established OPTN in the 1980s. During the past few decades, several efforts have been made by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to address disparities in liver transplantation with notable improvements in many areas. Nonetheless, disparities have persisted across insurance type, sex, race/ethnicity, geographic area, and age. African Americans have lower rates of referral to transplant centers, females have lower rates of transplantation from the liver waiting list than males, and public insurance is associated with worse posttransplant outcomes than private insurance. In addition, pediatric candidates and older adults have a disadvantage on the liver transplant waiting list, and there are widespread regional disparities in transplantation. Given the large degree of inequity in liver transplantation, there is a tremendous need for studies to propose and model policy changes that may make the liver transplant system more just and equitable.

Advances in Rejection Management: Prevention and Treatment

Extended survival of liver transplant recipients has brought rejection management to the forefront of liver transplant research. This article discusses T-cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, and chronic rejection. We focus on the prevention and then discuss treatment options. Future directions of rejection management include biomarkers of rejection, which may allow for monitoring of patients who are considered high risk for rejection and detection of rejection before there is any clinical evidence to improve graft and patient survival. With improved graft life and survival of liver transplant recipients, the new frontier of rejection management focuses on immunosuppression minimization, withdrawal, and personalization.

Ethnicity and Insurance-Specific Disparities in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score at Time of Liver Transplant Waitlist Registration and its Impact on Mortality

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Disparities in timely referral to liver transplantation (LT) evaluation persist. We aim to examine race/ethnicity and insurance-specific differences in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at time of waitlist (WL) registration and its impact on WL survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated U.S. adults listed for LT using 2005-2018 United Network for Organ Sharing LT registry. Multiple linear regression methods examined factors associated with MELD at listing, and Fine-Gray competing risks regression were used to analyze WL mortality.

RESULTS

Among 144,163 WL registrants (median age = 56 years, 65.3% male, 56.4% private insurance, 23.3% Medicare, 15.7% Medicaid), mean WL MELD at listing was higher in African Americans versus non-Hispanic whites (2.57 points higher, 95%CI: 2.40-2.74, P < 0.001). Compared with patients with private insurance, adjusted mean WL MELD was higher among those with no insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid (P < 0.001 for all). After correcting for differences in MELD at listing, Asians had lower risk of WL death versus non-Hispanic whites (subhazard ratio (SHR): 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-1.00, P = 0.04), but no difference was observed in African Americans or Hispanics. Compared with patients with private insurance, higher risk of WL death was observed in patients with no insurance (SHR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.14-1.56, P < 0.001), Medicare (SHR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.16-1.25, P < 0.001), or Medicaid (SHR: 1.22, 95%CI: 1.17-1.27, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Higher MELD scores at listing among African Americans did not translate into increased WL mortality. Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured had significantly higher WL mortality than privately insured patients, even after correcting for disparities in MELD scores at listing.