Wrong inhalation technique is associated to poor asthma clinical outcomes. Is there room for improvement?

Effective inhaler technique education is achievable - assessment and comparison of five inhaler devices errors

Objective

The study is based on a respiratory educational program aimed at training medical personnel to use inhalers correctly and educating patients on improving their inhalation skills.

Methods

Adult patients with asthma were divided into groups according to the inhaler: Ellipta, Diskus, Cyclohaler, Pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), and Turbuhaler. Patients were assessed for inhalation skills and then educated by previously trained nurses. The results were collected in forms allowing the evaluation of the number of critical and other errors made by patients.

Results

The number of errors during inhalers use decreased at subsequent visits after education. The number of critical errors was lower than other errors for each device before and after education. Statistically significant differences in the inhalation technique assessment (before education, visit 1, and visit 2) were shown for Cyclohaler and pMDI (p < 0.0001), Turbuhaler (p = 0.0014), Diskus (p = 0.0025) and Ellipta (p = 0.0091).

Conclusion

Before education, the least technical difficulties were observed for the Cyclohaler, while in the Ellipta group, patients made the most errors. Education resulted in equalizing the level of correctness of inhalation, which was similarly high for each type of device. This means that after education, all inhalers have similar difficulty levels in performing the correct inhalation technique. However, achieved improvement may be influenced by other factors such as practice effects or confounding variables due to real-life nature of the study.

Intranasal corticosteroid users in The Netherlands: A drug utilization study

Background

To improve (patient-tailored) instructions for intranasal corticosteroid (INC) administration, we need to gain insight into specific characteristics of INC users and comedication use.

Objective

We examined INC prescriptions obtained from the Dutch InterAction Database to gain insight into the prevalence and incidence rates, INC use in previous years, and comedication.

Methods

We retrospectively examined INC prescriptions written between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Prevalence and incidence rates were stratified by age and sex. The use of INCs in previous years and comedication were analyzed.

Results

In 2019, a total of 172,563 INC prescriptions were written and dispensed to 75,048 individuals. Also in 2019, the prevalence and incidence of INC users were 68.9 and 25.6 per 1000 individuals, respectively. INCs were used by all age groups. More than half of INC users in 2019 did not receive a prescription in 2018, almost a quarter received a prescription in 5 consecutive years, 28% used an INC in combination with an inhaler, 29% used an INC together with a systemic antihistamine, 9% used an INC along with ocular medication, and 1% used an INC with an intranasal antihistamine. Several corticosteroid-containing drugs were being used in combination with INCs by 2% to 16% of those studied.

Conclusion

This study gives insights into opportunities for patient-tailored instructions. INCs are used by various age groups and by new or intermittent users as well as by continuous users. On the bases of these results, patient-tailored instructions can be developed and subsequently studied to determine whether the instructions affect treatment adherence and efficacy. The insights gained about comedication provide opportunities for improved evaluation of the INC administration technique. Taken together, these suggestions might lead to a more patient-tailored approach, which might in turn lead to improved treatment with INCs.

Service development project to pilot a digital technology innovation for video direct observation of therapy in adult patients with asthma

BACKGROUND

Adherence to pharmacotherapy and use of the correct inhaler technique are important basic principles of asthma management. Video- or remote-direct observation of therapy (v-DOT) could be a feasible approach to facilitate monitoring and supervising therapy, supporting the delivery of standard care.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the utility and the feasibility of v-DOT to monitor inhaler technique and adherence to treatment in adults attending the asthma outpatient service in a tertiary hospital in Northern Ireland.

METHOD

The project evaluated use of the technology with 10 asthma patients. Patient and clinician feedback was obtained, in addition to measures of patient engagement and disease-specific clinical markers to assess the feasibility and utility of v-DOT technology in this group of patients.

RESULTS

The engagement rate with v-DOT for participating patients averaged 78% (actual video uploads vs expected video uploads) over a median 7 week usage period. Although 50% of patients reported a technical issue at some stage during the usage period, all patients and clinicians reported that the technology was easy to use and that they were satisfied with the outcomes. A range of positive impacts were observed, including optimised inhaler technique and an observed improvement in lung function. An increase in asthma control test scores aligned with clinical aims to promote adherence and alleviate symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The v-DOT technology was shown to be a feasible method of assessing inhaler technique and monitoring adherence in this small group of adult asthma patients. A range of positive impacts for participating patients and clinicians were observed. Not all patients invited to join the project agreed to participate or engage with using the technology, highlighting that in this setting, digital modes of delivering care provide only one of the approaches in the necessary "tool kit" for clinicians and patients.

Patient experiences of their current asthma care and their views toward providing support for patients with asthma in community pharmacy: A Qualitative study

Background

An estimated 300 million people live with asthma globally. In England, a significant percentage live with poorly controlled asthma symptoms. Community pharmacists might be able to play a role in filling gaps in asthma care as they have the expertise and are in regular contact with patients with long term conditions. This study described patients' experiences of the management of their asthma in the general physician (GP) practice and community pharmacy settings and explored patients' views on providing support for them in community pharmacy.

Method

This is a descriptive qualitative study. Thirteen adult asthma patients were recruited from a GP practice in the Northwest of England. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted face-to-face or by telephone. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Ethics approval was obtained before the study commenced and all participants gave informed written consent to participate.

Results

We identified challenges in the current asthma care provided to patients with asthma including lack of continuity of care, inability to book an appointment and other experienced differences in the quality of asthma care provided to them and/or access to annual asthma reviews across different GP practices. Additionally, there is lack of awareness of services provided in community pharmacy. These challenges along with having comorbidities alongside asthma may negatively affect asthma patients' engagement with their asthma appointments and their behaviour toward their asthma.

Conclusions

Patients showed trust in community pharmacists same as other HCPs to support them with their asthma care. Patients thought that being provided with regular asthma care including reviews in community pharmacy might be a suitable approach to respond to patients' needs and preferences in terms of their asthma management because of ease of access to community pharmacy. Pharmacists could be involved in the provision of community pharmacy-based asthma interventions that involve more than inhaler technique education. Further research should focus on developing structured approaches for asthma patient education that can be implemented consistently in the context of community pharmacy in England.

Digital inhalers for asthma management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although digital inhaler systems for asthma management have been commercially available for over a decade, their current use in clinical practice is limited. This review outlines barriers and offers potential solutions to their implementation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Digital inhaler systems demonstrate increased controller medication adherence, decreased quick-relief medication use, and improved asthma control.

SUMMARY

Use of digital inhaler systems is supported by data from large clinical trials demonstrating improved asthma outcomes. Navigating telemedicine during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to advances clearing the path for increased adoption of digital inhaler systems. Progress in areas including patient education and onboarding, clinical management, coding and billing, privacy and security have facilitated implementation in clinical practice.

The impact of the clip-tone training device and its smartphone application to pressurized metered-dose inhaler in adult asthmatics

BACKGROUND

Despite traditional inhaler technique counseling, many patients make clinically important mistakes when they use their inhalers. This study investigates the value of using a connected inhalation aid when adults with asthma use their metered-dose inhaler (pMDI).

METHODS

Adult asthmatics (n = 221), using a pMDI, were randomly divided into a verbal training group (n = 110) and an enhanced training group (n = 111). 21 subjects were lost during the study, each group included 100 subjects at the end of the study. The study was divided into 3 visits. Traditional pMDI training was delivered at visit 1 to both groups which included an explanation of the steps with special stress on frequently mistaken steps e.g. exhalation before use and inhaling slowly and deeply. The enhanced training group was enhanced by using the Clip-Tone training aid linked to its dedicated smartphone app. enhanced training patients were encouraged to use this connected training aid during real-life use between the study visits. Baseline data were collected at the first visit. At all three visits (baseline, 1 month, and 2 months), subjects first completed all inhaler techniques, health outcome measures, received inhaler training, then took bronchodilators, and 30 min later repeated the lung function outcome measures.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in the total mean number of pMDI inhalation techniques mistakes at visits 2 and 3, with a lower number of mistakes (p < 0.05) for slower inhalations for the enhanced training group compared to the verbal training group. Inhalation time (an indicator of a slow inhalation) significantly (p < 0.05) improved at each visit in the enhanced training group. In the enhanced training group, there was a gradual significant increase (p < 0.05) in lung functions while the improvements in the verbal training group were only significant (p < 0.05) at visit 3, and by visit 3, the enhanced training group had significantly higher scores than the verbal training group on both FEV₁ and PEF% predicted. The asthma control test (ACT) score improved at each visit in both groups with a greater increase in the enhanced training group (p < 0.05) and more patients (44 and 21) improved their score by 3 or more in the second and third visit respectively.

CONCLUSION

The connected Clip-Tone training aid helped patients improve their pMDI inhaler technique and their asthma control compared to traditional methods. These results highlight the potential of connected inhalers in the future management of inhaled therapy.

Exploring General Practitioners' Preferences and Experience with Respiratory Inhaler Devices

Introduction

Correct inhaler technique is essential for the optimal delivery of inhaled medicines and the successfully management of respiratory conditions. The general practitioner (GP), the prescriber of inhaled medicines, plays a crucial role in educating patients on inhaler technique. However, in the real-world setting, there are barriers. For the GP, it is time and competence and for the patient, it is their ability to recognise inhaler technique as an issue and their ability to maintain correct inhaler technique over time. This study aimed to determine GPs’ experience, skills and priority placed on inhaler technique and to identify factor(s) associated with inhaler technique competence.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study design surveyed GPs’ perspectives on inhaler use and preferences for inhaler prescribing within their practice setting. GP inhaler technique was assessed. GPs were recruited through an established network of GP practices. Data collected include (i) practice demographics, (ii) inhaler technique opinions and experience, (iii) inhaler prescribing preferences and (iv) inhaler education history data. Data were analysed descriptively and multivariate logistic regression modelling was used to explore the relationship between outcomes and GPs’ ability to use devices correctly.

Results

A total of 227 GPs completed the inhaler survey. Sixty-three percent of GPs reported receiving previous inhaler education and 73.3% educated or checked their patients’ inhaler technique; 64.5% felt they were somewhat competent in doing so. GPs who reported not demonstrating inhaler technique believed that a pharmacist or a practice nurse would do so. When prescribing new inhaler devices, GPs considered the disease being treated first and then patient’s experience with inhalers; they often already have an inhaler preference and this was related to familiarity and perceived ease of use. For GPs, inhaler competence was not associated with their previous inhaler education or the priority placed on inhaler technique.

Conclusion

GPs do recognise the importance of inhaler technique in respiratory management but their technique can be better supported with regular educational updates to inform them about new inhalers and management practices and to support appropriate inhaler choices for their patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41030-022-00197-6.

Can electronic monitoring with a digital smart spacer support personalised medication adherence and inhaler technique education in patients with asthma?: Protocol of the randomised controlled OUTERSPACE trial

INTRODUCTION

Medication adherence and inhaler technique in patients with asthma remain suboptimal. A digital, smart spacer may support personalised adherence and inhaler technique education. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of undertaking a definitive randomised controlled trial of personalised, smart spacer data-driven education and explore clinical benefits.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We present the design of the multicentre, randomised controlled OUtcomes following Tailored Education and Retraining: Studying Performance and AdherenCE feasibility trial of 2 months. Patients will be recruited from four Dutch general practices. At t=-1, patients with asthma ≥18 years using inhaled corticosteroids±long-acting beta-agonists±short-acting beta-agonists administered with a pressurised-metered-dose-inhaler and spacer (n=40) will use a smart spacer for 1 month. The rechargeable CE-marked smart spacer (Aerochamber Plus with Flow Vu) includes a sensor that monitors adherence and inhalation technique to prescribed dosing regimen of both maintenance and reliever inhalers. After 1 month (t=0), patients are 1:1 randomised into two groups: control group (usual care) versus intervention group (personalised education). At t=-1, t=0 and t=1 month, the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire and Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) are administered and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is assessed. At t=0 and t=1, spirometry is performed. At t=1, usability and satisfaction will be analysed using the System Usability Scale and interviews with patients and healthcare providers. Primary outcome is the overall feasibility of a definitive trial assessed by patient recruitment speed, participation and drop-out rate. Secondary outcomes are patient and healthcare provider satisfaction and exploratory clinical outcomes are adherence, inhaler technique, TAI score, FeNO, lung function, ACQ and WPAI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the RTPO in Leeuwarden, Netherlands (number: NL78361.099.21). Patients will provide written informed consent. Study findings will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed scientific and professional journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL9637.

Assisting Students With Asthma Inhaler Technique and Knowledge

Proper inhaler use is critical to asthma management, but many children and youth do not use their inhalers correctly. School nurses are ideally positioned and have an important role in assessing the inhaler technique and knowledge regarding its use among students. This article discusses common student errors with inhaler technique, along with knowledge deficits surrounding use of asthma inhalers. A tool for assessing inhaler use is provided, in addition to suggestions for how to assist students with improved inhaler technique. By assessing inhaler technique and knowledge early in the school year, school nurses proactively assist in improved student management of their asthma.

Handling Errors in the Use of Inhalation Devices: Inhalation Technique Skills and Knowledge in Pediatric Nurses

BACKGROUND

Children suffering from bronchial diseases need assistance from nurses in the use of inhalation devices.

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess nurses' skills and knowledge concerning drug administration with inhalation devices in hospitalized pediatric patients.

METHODS

An expert panel defined medication errors in drug administration with inhalation devices in children. We monitored 241 inhalation procedures to investigate nurses' inhalation technique skills. Twenty-nine nurses completed a questionnaire to assess nurses' knowledge.

RESULTS

Skills: In 93 of 241 (39%) inhalation procedures, the mask/mouthpiece did not fit airtight. In none of the 11 inhalations administering a glucocorticoid, the patient's mouth was thoroughly cleaned afterward. Knowledge: Ten of 29 nurses (34%) thought a distance between mask and the patient's face was acceptable. Only 16 of 29 (55%) knew that it is necessary to thoroughly clean the patient's mouth after the inhalation of budesonide.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that education on inhalation procedures including practical training is required to increase patient safety.

Impact of Nurse-Led Asthma Intervention on Child Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review

Given the leading role school nurses occupy within the school setting, they are often the most suited health care professionals to lead asthma programs. However, most school-based asthma programs have been conducted by researchers outside the school setting. Thus, we aim to determine what is currently known about the type of school nurse-led asthma intervention programs and their impact on children's asthma-related outcomes. This article describes published literature on school nurse-led asthma intervention programs for the school-aged population using Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework. A search strategy was developed and implemented in six electronic databases from 1980 to 2020. Results showed that school nurse-led asthma programs were predominantly educational interventions. Yet given the positive outcomes of school nurse-led asthma interventions reported across the articles reviewed, it is important to emphasize the leadership role school nurses assume in asthma programs, to promote more positive asthma-related outcomes in school children.

The effect of Clip-tone® and its smartphone application on optimisation of metered-dose inhalers inhalation technique

BACKGROUNDS

Although metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) therapy is convenient and widely prescribed, its use usually results in repetitive inhalation technique errors. One of the most repetitive errors is inhaling too fast through the pMDI. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Clip-tone^® along with smartphone visual feedback application on the subject's inhalation time.

METHODS

Two hundred subjects were included in the study. They were randomised into four groups. Group 1 received only verbal counselling; group 2 received verbal counselling with resistance (a modified Clip-tone^® that does not produce whistle attached to their pMDI); group 3 received verbal counselling plus whistle (as audio feedback) from ordinary Clip-tone^® and group 4 received verbal counselling plus audio feedback (whistle) from Clip-tone^® and visual feedback (smartphone application). Inhalation time through the pMDI for each subject was recorded three times and inter and intra-subjects variations were calculated.

RESULTS

Verbal counselling plus audio feedback and verbal counselling plus audio and visual feedbacks groups had 45/50 (90%) and 37/50 (74%) subjects respectively, having correct inhalation flow (inhaling at between 3 to 7 seconds). Verbal counselling plus audio feedback and verbal counselling plus audio and visual feedbacks groups' inter and intra-subjects variations were lower than that of verbal counselling and verbal counselling with resistance groups which had 28/50 (52%) and 20/50 (40%) subjects respectively, with inhalation time between 3 and 7 seconds.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing audio feedback by the Clip-tone^® along with smartphone visual feedback application maintained the deep and slow inhalation through pMDI much better compared to verbal counselling only. We recommend the patients to take all their inhaled doses using pMDI attached to a training device like Clip-tone^® along with a smartphone visual feedback application for optimisation of the aerosol delivery from the pMDI.

Comparison of inhalation technique with the Diskus and Autohaler in asthmatic children at home

Objective

Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and anti-inflammatory medication is the cornerstone of treatment. Inhalers are frequently used incorrectly when demonstrated in the hospital, suggesting poor technique at home. We aimed to 1) compare daily inhalation technique with the Diskus and Autohaler in asthmatic children by filming inhalations at home and 2) compare daily inhalation technique with technique demonstrated in the hospital.

Methods

We performed a randomised study in asthmatic children (aged 6–18 years) from the outpatient clinic of Medisch Spectrum Twente hospital (Enschede, The Netherlands) from July 2014 to April 2016. Children received inhalation instructions for the Diskus and Autohaler and were randomised to use one device in the morning and the other in the evening. During the 28-day study period, inhalations were filmed at home and subsequently demonstrated in the hospital. All inhalations were checked for seven critical errors per device.

Results

636 videos with the Diskus and 663 with the Autohaler were provided by 27 children. The most common critical error in daily life was an incorrect device position during preparation of the Diskus (n=271) and an insufficiently deep inhalation (n=39) using the Autohaler. Percentage of correct days using the Diskus was 44%, compared to 96% with the Autohaler (p<0.001). The two most common errors with the Diskus were made at least twice as often at home than in the hospital.

Conclusion

Inhalation technique at home was markedly better with the Autohaler than with the Diskus. Paediatricians should be aware that hospital-based demonstrations can overestimate daily inhalation technique with the Diskus.

Inhalation technique at home is markedly better with the Autohaler than with the Diskus. Paediatricians should be aware that hospital-based demonstrations can overestimate daily inhalation technique with the Diskus.https://bit.ly/3cYK4eq

Uncontrolled asthma across GINA treatment steps 2 - 5 in a large US patient cohort

OBJECTIVE

Despite advances in treatment, asthma remains uncontrolled in many patients, with increased risk of exacerbation and associated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). We describe patient characteristics, exacerbations, asthma control, and HCRU using GINA treatment step (GS) as a proxy for asthma severity. .

METHODS

Using a large, US, health-claims database, 4 longitudinal cohorts of 517,738 patients in GS2-5, including a subgroup of patients with baseline eosinophil (EOS) counts, were analyzed retrospectively (study period 2010 - 2016). Index for each cohort was patients' first time entering the GS, determined by first claim of first regimen. Uncontrolled asthma was defined according to published criteria as a multi-dimensional measure that includes number of exacerbations. Key variables including, baseline characteristics, post-index exacerbations, and HCRU (all-cause and asthma-specific events) are summarized by descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Uncontrolled asthma was reported in 19.8% patients in GS2, 44.8% in GS3, 49.3% in GS4, and 58.6% in GS5. Annualized mean (SD) rates of exacerbation 12 months post-index generally increased across GS2-5 (0.26 [0.86], 0.32 [0.79], 0.36 [0.83], 0.29 [0.86], respectively). HCRU also increased with increasing GS, with higher HCRU among the uncontrolled cohort within each GS. In patients with EOS ≥300 cells/µL, uncontrolled asthma also increased with increasing GS (21.8%, 43.9%, 50.5%, 67.2% for GS2-5, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This large database study provides real-world evidence of the substantial degree of uncontrolled asthma in US clinical practice across GS, supporting calls for better asthma management. Healthcare burden tends to increase with lack of control in all groups, highlighting the need for improved patient education, adherence, access, and treatment optimization.

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Performance Characteristics of Breezhaler® and Aerolizer® in the Real-World Setting

The evaluation of errors in use with different inhaler devices is challenging to quantify as there are a number of definitions of critical and non-critical errors with respect to inhaler use; in addition, performance characteristics of the device, such as airflow resistance, can also influence effective use in the real-world setting. Repeated observations and checking/correcting inhaler use are essential to optimise clinical effectiveness of inhaled therapy in patients. Breezhaler^® is a single unit-dose dry powder inhaler used in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and in asthma (budesonide) that has low airflow resistance, making it easier for patients of varying disease severities to achieve the inhalation flow rate required for lung deposition of treatment. Similar to Breezhaler^®, the Aerolizer^® is a single unit-dose dry powder inhaler used in asthma management with low airflow resistance. Studies have shown relatively low rates of critical errors with Breezhaler^® and Aerolizer^®, with similarities in the critical errors reported; these data on critical errors together with similarities in the usability of Breezhaler^® and Aerolizer^® further support the functional similarity between the two devices in both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Breezhaler^® also has patient-feedback features, including use of a transparent drug capsule that can be checked after inhalation to see it is empty. The low resistance of the dose-confirming Breezhaler^® results in less inspiratory effort being required by patients for its effective use, which allows the device to be used effectively across a wide age range of patients and disease severities.

The Quality of Instructional YouTube Videos for the Administration of Intranasal Spray: Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis is a common disorder affecting both children and adults. Recommended treatment consists of intranasal corticosteroid spray administration, but only few patients administer the nasal spray in the correct technical manner. A wrong administration technique may result in side effects and affect the efficacy and adherence, thus making accurate administration instructions indispensable. Unfortunately, information about intranasal drug administration is generally not explained accurately, thereby leading to confusion among patients and inaccuracy in the self-administration of drugs.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we analyzed instructional videos available on YouTube for the administration of nasal sprays for allergic rhinitis. Our aim was to determine if the videos provided instructions in accordance with the standardized nationwide patient protocol in the Netherlands for intranasal spray administration.

METHODS

Instructional videos for the administration of aqueous formulations of nasal spray for allergic rhinitis were found on YouTube. All videos were reviewed by 2 researchers and scored using the instructions from the Dutch standardized protocol. Correct instructions were given a score of 1, while incorrect or missing instructions were given a score of 0. The interrater reliability using Cohen ĸ was used to determine the differences in the scores between the researchers.

RESULTS

We identified 33 YouTube videos made by different health care professionals and pharmaceutical companies around the world. None of the videos displayed all the steps correctly, while 5 of the 33 (15%) videos displayed over 75% of the steps correctly. The median score of the correctly displayed steps was 11 out of 19 (range 2-17, IQR 6). The interrater reliability using Cohen ĸ was statistically significant (range 0.872-1.00, P<.001). The steps "neutral position of the head," "breathing out through the mouth," and "periodically cleaning with water" scored the lowest and were incorrectly displayed in 28 (85%), 28 (85%), and 30 (91%) of the 33 videos, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our study revealed that only few instructional videos on YouTube provided correct instructions for the administration of nasal sprays to patients. The inaccuracy of the instructions for nasal spray administration in the majority of the videos may lead to confusion in patients and incorrect use of nasal sprays. In the future, it is important to make evidence-based instructional videos that show patients the correct technique of nasal spray administration.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

School Nurses' Perspectives on Components of Asthma Programs to Address Pediatric Disparities

OBJECTIVE

To use a community engaged, collaborative approach with school nurses working within an urban community, to develop recommendations for future school-based interventions targeting pediatric asthma disparities.

METHODS

Open-ended survey data were collected from 33 nurses (77% of nurses in the school district) during a face-to-face monthly health services meeting. Questions asked nurses to estimate the proportion of students with asthma with the necessary forms and medications at school and to describe perceived barriers to having such forms and medications, and potential initiatives that could be implemented. A 30-min asthma education class was also piloted with school nurses, who then rated its acceptability and feasibility. Open-ended survey data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Nurses estimated that 12% of students with asthma had an asthma action plan, 19% had a medication release form, and 15% had medications at school (i.e. inhalers). Four themes emerged regarding barriers to asthma management in schools and strategies for promoting asthma management in schools: coordination of care, asthma education, access to care, and medication adherence. Nurses noted the need for education focused specifically on teaching inhaler technique, and better communication between schools, providers, and families.

CONCLUSIONS

School nurses provided valuable information regarding specific barriers, as well as approaches to addressing these barriers in a future intervention. Findings suggest that a school-based intervention needs to address coordination among schools, parents, and medical providers, and will be optimally effective if it also addresses structural barriers.

A School Nurse-Led Asthma Program Reduces Absences: Evaluation of Easy Breathing for Schools

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether school nurses can assist pediatricians in providing asthma care and reduce school absenteeism through a program called Easy Breathing for Schools (EzBfS), a 5-element school nurse-led asthma management program and the effectiveness in reducing school absenteeism.

METHODS

Fifteen public school nurses in an urban community implemented EzBfS during the 2015-16 and 2016-17 school years. Program elements included assessment of asthma risk and asthma control, asthma education, medication review, and a pediatrician communication tool. School absence for any reason was the primary outcome; absentee rates for students with asthma enrolled in the program were compared to students with asthma in the entire school population using negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

School nurses enrolled 251/2,126 students with physician-confirmed asthma (2015-16: n = 114 and 2016-17: n = 137). Sixty eight percent of participants were Latino and 25% were Black with a mean age of 8.7 ± 2.2 years. Absentee rates were higher in children with asthma compared to children without asthma (8.3% vs 7.0% absent, respectively P < .001). Students enrolled in the program experienced a 25% decrease in absentee rate after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and school year (rate ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval, 0.67, 0.85) as compared to students with asthma not enrolled in the program. Participants also demonstrated improvement in inhaler technique score (P < .001). Ninety two percent of the nurses were satisfied with the program.

CONCLUSION

EzBfS, a pragmatic, nurse-led asthma management program, was successfully implemented by school nurses and significantly decreased school absences among a sample of students with asthma.

Prescribing trends of inhaler treatments for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease within a resource-constrained environment in the Scottish national health service: findings and implications

Background: There is an increasing prevalence of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) worldwide, leading to increased inhaler use. However, there are concerns with inhaler compliance resulting in different patented inhalers and longer-acting formulations. As a result, inhalers are now among the highest expenditure items in ambulatory care in Scotland leading to multiple initiatives to keep within budget without compromising care. Method: This study assesses inhaler utilization and expenditure between 2001 and 2017 alongside health authority initiatives. Results: There was an increase by 137% in inhaler utilization between 2001 and 2017, and a two-fold increase in expenditure, driven by the increasing use of patented combination inhalers to address concerns. This is very different to the oral markets where expenditure on proton pump inhibitors, statins, and antihypertensives have fallen considerably recently despite increased volumes due to the increasing use of low-cost generics. However, inhaler expenditure has started to fall with an increasing use of lower cost combinations and initiatives to reduce the steroid burden alongside monitoring patient care. Conclusion: Challenges with using and changing inhalers has meant this market has not followed other high-volume drug classes following patent loss. This is starting to change, with the situation monitored to enhance efficient prescribing alongside continued good quality care.