Transient Elastography is Superior to FIB-4 in Assessing the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B

Disease activity and changes in the fibrosis-4 index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with methotrexate for a short period

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the relationship between disease activity and changes in the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received methotrexate as Phase I treatment for a short period.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study, 144 patients (106 females, 38 males; median age: 68.05 years; range, 58.3 to 76.0 years) diagnosed with RA who had not received methotrexate before their diagnosis were included between April 2015 and September 2020. The patients' clinical data were recorded at baseline, six months, and 12 months. Patients with hepatitis, alcoholism, severe obesity, hypercholesterolemia, or overlapping autoimmune diseases and those receiving a maximum methotrexate dose of ≤10 mg/week were excluded. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of the changes in FIB-4 values from baseline. Mediation analysis was employed to determine the association between Disease Activity Score-28 for RA with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and changes in FIB-4 values, with the cumulative methotrexate dose as a mediator.

Results

FIB-4 values increased significantly from baseline to 12 months after methotrexate initiation. The cumulative methotrexate dose did not independently influence changes in FIB-4 values. After adjusting for confounding factors, the factor independently influencing the change in fibrosis-4 values from baseline was DAS28-ESR at six and 12 months (β=0.107 and β=0.086, respectively). The cumulative methotrexate dose did not mediate the relationship between DAS28-ESR at baseline and changes in FIB-4 values, and it did not affect changes in FIB-4 values over a short period.

Conclusion

Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity before methotrexate administration independently affected changes in FIB-4 values. We suggest monitoring FIB-4 values in patients with RA with high disease activity, even for a short period after methotrexate administration, as FIB-4 values in these patients may be underestimated.

Diagnostic Efficacy of Serum Asialo α1-Acid Glycoprotein Levels for Advanced Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Compared to That in Healthy Subjects: A Prospective Study

Background: Serum asialo α1-acid gycoprotein (AsAGP) is a novel biomarker specific to liver fibrosis. Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of serum AsAGP levels in classifying the severity of liver fibrosis and differentiating liver cirrhosis (LC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) from healthy controls. Methods: Overall, 206 subjects were prospectively enrolled. LC was diagnosed based on liver stiffness levels (>11 kPa) measured using transient elastography. Serum AsAGP levels were measured using an antibody-lectin sandwich immunoassay. We investigated the diagnostic performance by comparing serum AsAGP levels among healthy control, CHB, and CHB with LC groups. Sensitivity, specificity, and optimal AsAGP cut-off values were also calculated. Results: Serum AsAGP levels were significantly different between healthy controls, CHB patients, and CHB patients with LC (1.04 ± 0.31 µg/mL, 1.12 ± 0.34 µg/mL, 1.51 ± 0.43 µg/mL respectively; p < 0.001). Serum AsAGP levels positively correlated with liver stiffness (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). AUROC of healthy control versus CHB with LC was 0.821 (p < 0.001, optimal cut-off 1.036 µg/mL). AUROC of healthy control versus CHB was 0.624 (p = 0.049, optimal cut-off level 0.934 µg/mL). AUROC of CHB versus CHB with LC was 0.765, (p < 0.001, optimal cut-off 1.260 µg/mL). Conclusions: Serum AsAGP levels in CHB patients with LC were significantly higher than those in healthy controls and CHB patients. AsAGP levels showed good diagnostic performance in predicting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, which suggests a potential role as a biomarker for predicting the progression of liver disease in CHB.

HBV co-infection is associated with persistently elevated liver stiffness measurement in HIV-positive adults: A 6-year single-centre cohort study in Nigeria

Background

In Nigeria, the effect of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) on long-term liver outcomes in persons with HIV (PLH) has not been described. We determined changes in liver stiffness measure (LSM) using transient elastography over 6 years in HIV mono-infected and HIV-HBV co-infected Nigerians initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) and factors associated with LSM decline.

Methods

This single centre, cohort study enrolled ART-naïve HIV mono- and HIV-HBV co-infected adults (≥18 years) at the APIN Public Health Initiatives–supported HIV Care and Treatment Centre at Jos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria, from 7/2011 to 2/2012. LSM at baseline, Years 3 and 6 were analysed using longitudinal models to estimate changes over time and their predictors.

Results

Data from 100 (31%) HIV-HBV co-infected and 225 (69%) HIV mono-infected participants were analysed. Median LSM at baseline was 6.10 (IQR: 4.60–7.90) kPa in co-infected and 5.10 (IQR: 4.40–6.10) kPa in mono-infected participants. In adjusted analyses, average LSM was not significantly different between Year 0 and 3 (β = 0.02, −0.22 to 0.26, p = 0.87 and Year 0 and 6 (β = −0.02, −0.23 to 0.27, p = 0.88) in both groups ( p>0.05), but co-infected participants had significantly higher LSM than mono-infected throughout follow-up (β = 0.018, 0.019–0.28, p < 0.001). Year 3 LSM differed according to ART initiation status by Year 3 (initiators - non-initiators: −0.87, −1.70 to −0.29).

Conclusion

In this cohort, LSM remained higher among HIV-HBV co-infected versus HIV mono-infected participants throughout follow-up. Our findings emphasize the continuing need for monitoring of liver outcomes in HIV-HBV co-infected populations on ART and the importance of preventing HBV infection among PLH to optimize liver health.

Different Performance of Liver Stiffness Measurement According to Etiology and Outcome for the Prediction of Liver-Related Events

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE) has shown promising results for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic decompensation in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). However, whether prognostic performance of TE differs according to etiology or type of outcome remains further clarification.

METHODS

Performance of LSM for the prediction of HCC and hepatic decompensation was analyzed in a cohort of 4026 patients with asymptomatic CLD.

RESULTS

During median 4.5 years of follow-up (range 3.0-6.2 years), liver-related events (LRE) were observed in 196 patients (166 with HCC, 45 with hepatic decompensation, and 15 with both). In the multivariate analysis, LSM was independent factor associated with LRE and showed high AUROC (0.78). When stratified by type of outcome and etiology of liver disease, LSM showed high AUROC for the prediction of HCC for patients with non-viral hepatitis (0.89), while it showed relatively low AUROC for the prediction of HCC for patients with viral hepatitis (0.75). For the prediction of hepatic decompensation, LSM showed high AUROC for patients with both viral- and non-viral hepatitis (0.90, 0.90, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LSM showed powerful prognostic role for the prediction of LRE in patients with CLD. Notably, HCC risk was not negligible in patients with viral hepatitis who showed LSM value < 10 kPa, indicating watchful attention for HCC is still needed for viral hepatitis patients with low LSM.

Role of transient elastography in the prediction of de novo recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation: single-center Egyptian study

Background

Radiofrequency is one of the curative treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the progressive improvements in the efficacy of radiofrequency, the survival of patients with HCC who undergo radiofrequency remains disappointing, mainly due to frequent intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after radiofrequency. We aimed to evaluate the role of transient elastography (TE) in the prediction of de novo recurrence of HCC after radiofrequency and to compare between transient elastography and the serological fibrosis indices in the prediction of de novo recurrence of HCC.

Results

Thirty HCC patients underwent baseline transient elastography for preinterventional assessment of the degree of fibrosis. Also noninvasive serum fibrosis indices were calculated from baseline data, including age platelet index (API), cirrhosis discrimination score (CDS), and FIB-4 index. Patients achieving complete response after 1 month post radiofrequency ablation were followed for further 12 months by triphasic abdominal CT scan to detect de novo lesions according to modified RECIST criteria. Baseline means of CDS, FIB4, and API were 6.03 ± 1.5, 3.98 ± 2.58, and 1.24 ± 1.08, respectively. Transient elastography revealed 28 patients with F4 and only 2 patients with F3 (mean liver stiffness 22.45 ± 10.36 Kba). There was a significant negative correlation between liver stiffness (LS) and de novo recurrence of HCC (mean of LS in patients with a complete response was 17.19 ± 3.32 while in those with de novo recurrence was 36.94 ± 5.93, with the best cut off value ≥24.65 (p value < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between CDC, FIB4, API scores, and de novo recurrence of HCC. It was found that the liver stiffness was significantly associated with the prediction of hepatic decompensation (p value <0.001). Also, liver stiffness at the cutoff value > 42.75 (p value = 0.031) was significantly associated with the prediction of 1-year mortality after radiofrequency ablation.

Conclusion

Our data suggested that liver stiffness measurement in hepatocellular carcinoma patients was a useful predictor of de novo recurrence, overall survival, and possibility of hepatic decompensation after radiofrequency ablation.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and fibrosis: novel non-invasive approaches for diagnosis and risk stratification

Despite the availability of an effective vaccination, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still a major health concern worldwide. Chronic HBV infection can lead to fibrosis accumulation and overtime to cirrhosis, the principal risk factor for liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Liver biopsy is still considered the gold standard for fibrosis assessment, even though it is invasive and not exempt of complications. Overtime, several non-invasive methods for the detection of liver fibrosis have been developed and gradually introduced into clinical practice. However, their main limitation is the poor performance for the detection of intermediate stages of fibrosis. Finally, novel serological biomarkers, polygenic risk scores and imaging methods have been proposed in last years as novel promising tools to correctly identify the degree of liver fibrosis and to monitor liver disease progression. In this narrative review, we provide an overview on the novel non-invasive approaches for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and risk stratification of patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Asian consensus recommendations on optimizing the diagnosis and initiation of treatment of hepatitis B virus infection in resource-limited settings

Asia has an intermediate-to-high prevalence of and high morbidity and mortality from hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Optimization of diagnosis and initiation of treatment is one of the crucial strategies for lowering disease burden in this region. Therefore, a panel of 24 experts from 10 Asian countries convened, and reviewed the literature, to develop consensus guidance on diagnosis and initiation of treatment of HBV infection in resource-limited Asian settings. The panel proposed 11 recommendations related to diagnosis, pre-treatment assessment, and indications of therapy of HBV infection, and management of HBV-infected patients with co-infections. In resource-limited Asian settings, testing for hepatitis B surface antigen may be considered as the primary test for diagnosis of HBV infection. Pre-treatment assessments should include tests for complete blood count, liver and renal function, hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg), anti-HBe, HBV DNA, co-infection markers and assessment of severity of liver disease. Noninvasive tests such as AST-to-platelet ratio index, fibrosis score 4 or transient elastography may be used as alternatives to liver biopsy for assessing disease severity. Considering the high burden of HBV infection in Asia, the panel adopted an aggressive approach, and recommended initiation of antiviral therapy in all HBV-infected, compensated or decompensated cirrhotic individuals with detectable HBV DNA levels, regardless of HBeAg status or alanine transaminase levels. The panel also developed a simple algorithm for guiding the initiation of treatment in noncirrhotic, HBV-infected individuals. The recommendations proposed herein, may help guide clinicians, to optimize the diagnosis and improvise the treatment rates for HBV infection in Asia.

Serum microRNA-122 and Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein are useful tools for liquid biopsy of the patients with hepatitis B virus and advanced liver fibrosis

Background

Noninvasive methods to accurately and conveniently evaluate liver fibrosis are desirable. MicroRNA (miR) is one of the candidates. MiRs are small RNAs consisting of 19–25 nucleotides that negatively regulate many target genes at transcriptional levels. Recently, many researchers have focused on circulating miRs in the blood stream as biomarkers. Hepatic miR-122 has been reported to have an association with viral replication and hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatic C virus (HCV) infection.

Methods

We measured serum miR-122 levels in HBV- and HCV-infected patients confirmed with liver biopsy. We also investigated a novel liver fibrosis marker Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein [WFA(+)-M2BP]. We evaluated the diagnostic usefulness of these markers in hepatic fibrosis and inflammation of patients with chronic viral infection.

Results

The serum miR-122 levels of HBV-infected patients were higher than those of the control subjects. In HBV-infected patients, the serum miR-122 levels of patients with advanced liver fibrosis were significantly lower. Serum WFA(+)-M2BP was significantly higher dependent on both the staging of fibrosis and the grading of inflammatory activity in patients with both HBV and HCV infection. We also observed that higher serum WFA(+)-M2BP levels augmented the prediction of advanced liver fibrosis among HBV-infected patients with lower serum miR-122 levels.

Conclusions

A lower serum miR-122 level is a useful predictor of advanced liver fibrosis in HBV-infected patients. Serum WFA(+)-M2BP could predict liver fibrosis in both HBV and HCV infection. The combination of these markers may result in the more accurate evaluation of liver fibrosis in HBV infection.

Serum hepatitis B core antibody titer use in screening for significant fibrosis in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have revealed that hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) levels vary throughout the different phases of treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients and can be used as a predictor of treatment response in both interferon-α and nucleoside analogue therapies. However, few data have been published regarding the relationship between quantitative anti-HBc (qAnti-HBc) levels and liver fibrosis in patients with CHB.

RESULTS

A total of 489 HBeAg-positive (HBeAg (+)) and 135 HBeAg-negative (HBeAg (-)) patients were recruited. In both HBeAg (+) and HBeAg (-) groups, the S0-1/S0 subjects had significantly lower qAnti-HBc levels than the S2-4 subjects (p < 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the parameters for predicting significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2) included age, PLT and qAnti-HBc. In HBeAg (+) subjects, the AUROC of qAnti-HBc for predicting significant fibrosis was 0.734 (95% CI 0.689 to 0.778) and the optimal cut-off was 4.58 log10IU/mL, with a sensitivity of 63.08% and a specificity of 74.83%. In HBeAg (-) subjects, the AUROC was 0.707 (95% CI 0.612 to 0.801) and the optimal cut-off value was 4.37 log10IU/mL, with a sensitivity of 75.53% and a specificity of 56.10%.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2012 to 2015, we conducted a cross-sectional study of treatment-naïve CHB patients. Liver biochemistry, hepatitis B virus (HBV) serological markers, HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) titers and HBV genotype were determined using commercial assays, and serum qAnti-HBc levels were measured using double-sandwich immunoassay. Liver biopsies and serum samples were obtained on the same day.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed an association between high serum qAnti-HBc levels and significant fibrosis (S ≥ 2) in treatment-naïve CHB patients. Furthermore, we described a serum qAnti-HBc cut-off for predicting significant fibrosis in CHB patients infected with HBV genotype B or C.

Fibrosis assessment in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major cause of liver morbidity and mortality worldwide. While a proportion of the 250 million individuals chronically infected with HBV will not come to significant harm or require therapy, many others risk developing complications of the end-stage liver disease such as decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), without intervention. Due to the complex natural history of HBV infection, patients require an expert assessment to interpret biochemistry, viral serology and appropriately stage the disease, and to initiate monitoring and/or therapy where indicated. The detection and quantification of liver fibrosis is a key factor for disease management and prognostication for an individual with HBV. The reliance on invasive liver biopsy to stage disease is diminishing with the advent of robust non-invasive blood- and imaging-based algorithms which can reliably stage disease in many cases. These tests are now incorporated into International guidelines for HBV management and relied upon daily to inform clinical judgement. Both blood- and imaging-based approaches have advantages over liver biopsy, including minimal risks, lower cost, better patient acceptance and speed of results, while disadvantages include lower diagnostic accuracy in intermediate disease stages and variability with co-existing hepatic inflammation or steatosis. This review outlines the methods of fibrosis assessment in chronic HBV infection and focuses on the most commonly used blood- and imaging-based non-invasive tests, reviewing their diagnostic performance and applicability to patient care.