Characterization of small (≤3 cm) hepatic lesions with atypical enhancement feature and hypointensity in hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in cirrhosis: A STARD-compliant article

Imaging of the Liver and Pancreas: The Added Value of MRI

MR is a powerful diagnostic tool in the diagnosis and management of most hepatic and pancreatic diseases. Thanks to its multiple sequences, the use of dedicated contrast media and special techniques, it allows a multiparametric approach able to provide both morphological and functional information for many pathological conditions. The knowledge of correct technique is fundamental in order to obtain a correct diagnosis. In this paper, different MR sequences will be illustrated in the evaluation of liver and pancreatic diseases, especially those sequences which provide information not otherwise obtainable with other imaging techniques. Practical MR protocols with the most common indications of MR in the study of the liver and pancreas are provided.

Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and third in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-fetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study (computed tomography (CT) or MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is considered valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to surgical resection could improve the prognosis. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma may, therefore, be missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of MRI in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic Test of Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and three other databases to 9 November 2021. We manually searched articles retrieved, contacted experts, handsearched abstract books from meetings held during the last 10 years, and searched for literature in OpenGrey (9 November 2021). Further information was requested by e-mails, but no additional information was provided. No data was obtained through correspondence with investigators. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and we tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 34 studies, with 4841 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability, we judged 15% (5/34) of studies to be at low concern and 85% (29/34) of studies to be at high concern mostly owing to characteristics of the participants, most of whom were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation, and due to pathology of the explanted liver being the only reference standard. MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 84.4% (95% CI 80.1% to 87.9%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 96.1%) (34 studies, 4841 participants; low-certainty evidence). MRI for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI 77.6% to 89.3%) and specificity 92.9% (95% CI 88.3% to 95.9%) (16 studies, 2150 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that using MRI as a second-line imaging modality to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 16% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 16% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.

Clinical features and diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of hepatic dysplastic nodules

Hepatic dysplastic nodules (DNs) are a group of neoplastic lesions with a diameter of more than 1 cm that belong to precancerous lesions, with abnormal cytoplasm and cells but without malignant basis in histology. Hepatic DNs lack typical tumor markers and clinical symptoms, and their clinical diagnosis relys mainly on imaging or/and tissue pathological examination. Thanks to the further research on the pathogenesis of hepatic DNs and the development of imaging technology, the combination of medical history, various examinationss, individual tumor markers, and imaging and histopathology techniques can significantly improve the early detection and diagnosis accuracy for hepatic DNs, and reduce the rate of missed and false diagnosis. Due to the potential malignancy risk of hepatic DNs, intervention measures should be carried out on hepatic DNs at all stages, in order to block the transformation process of DNs into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is of great clinical significance to reduce the incidence and mortality of HCC.

Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences for detection of dysplastic nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the overall diagnostic accuracy of different MR imaging sequences in the detection of the dysplastic nodule (DN).

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by two authors independently. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) 2 in RevMan software was used to score the included studies and assess their methodological quality. A random-effects model was used for statistical pooling by Meta-Disc. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (335 DN lesions in total) were included in our meta-analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) of T₂WI was 0.87. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of DWI were 0.81 (95%CI, 0.73-0.87), 0.90 (95%CI, 0.86-0.93), 7.04 (95%CI, 4.49-11.04), and 0.24 (95%CI, 0.17-0.33) respectively. In the arterial phase, pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR were 0.89 (0.84-0.93), 0.75 (0.72-0.79), 3.72 (2.51-5.51), and 0.17 (0.12-0.25), respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of the delayed phase were 0.78 (0.72-0.83), 0.60 (0.55-0.65), 2.19 (1.55-3.10), and 0.36 (0.23-0.55) separately. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, and NLR of the hepatobiliary phase were 0.77 (0.71-0.82), 0.92 (0.89-0.94), 8.74 (5.91-12.92), and 0.24 (0.14-0.41) respectively. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and PLR were higher on DWI and hepatobiliary phase in diagnosing LGDN than HGDN.

CONCLUSION

MR sequences, particularly DWI, arterial phase, and hepatobiliary phase imaging demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for DN.

KEY POINTS

• MRI has dramatically improved the detection and accurate diagnosis of DNs and their differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma. • Overall diagnostic accuracy of different MRI sequences in the detection of DN has not been studied before. • Our meta-analysis demonstrates that MRI achieves a high diagnostic value for DN, especially when using DWI, arterial phase imaging, and hepatobiliary phase imaging.

The value of the signal intensity of peritumoral tissue on Gd-EOB-DTPA dynamic enhanced MRI in assessment of microvascular invasion and pathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma

The aim of the study was to assess the potential role of preoperative gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) dynamic enhanced MR imaging for diagnosing microvascular invasion (MVI) and pathological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).A total of 113 consecutive HCC patients confirmed by histopathology underwent preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA dynamic enhanced MRI were included. Signal intensity (SI) of peritumoral, normal liver tissue and tumor parenchyma during arterial phase and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) were analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to assess the potential diagnostic capability for MVI and pathological grade of HCC. Kaplan-Meier method was performed to estimate the recurrence-free survival rate and compared using the log rank test.SI ratio of peritumoral tissue to normal liver in arterial phase (SIAp/Al) was independently associated with MVI [odds ratio (OR) = 3.115, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.867-5.198] and pathological grades (OR = 1.437, 95% CI: 1.042-1.981). The area under the curve (AUC) of SIAp/Al was equivalent to the SI of tumor parenchyma on arterial phase (SIAt) in distinguishing low and high pathological grades. However, the AUC of SIAp/Al (0.851) was larger than peritumoral hypointensity on HBP (0.668) for distinguishing MVI. The recurrence-free survival rate of HCC patients with SIAp/Al<1.1 was higher than HCC with SIAp/Al≥1.1(P = .025).The SIAp/Al in preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA dynamic enhanced MR imaging is a potential diagnosis marker for MVI and pathological grade of HCC noninvasively. The higher SIAp/Al may predict the poor prognosis of HCC after surgery.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Liver Lesion-Initial Characterization

Incidental liver masses are commonly identified on imaging performed for other indications. Since the prevalence of benign focal liver lesions in adults is high, even in patients with primary malignancy, accurate characterization of incidentally detected lesions is of paramount clinical importance. This document reviews utilization of various imaging modalities for characterization of incidentally detected liver lesions, discussed in the context of several clinical scenarios. For each clinical scenario, a summary of current evidence supporting the use of a given diagnostic modality is reported. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Diagnosis of Pre-HCC Disease by Hepatobiliary-Specific Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review

We first proposed a new concept, pre-hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) disease, to describe the precancerous condition of HCC, which has received scant attention from clinicians. Pre-HCC disease is defined as chronic liver injury concurrent with hepatic low- or high-grade dysplastic nodular lesions. Precise diagnosis of pre-HCC disease may prevent or arrest HCC and contribute to relieving the HCC burden worldwide, although noninvasive diagnosis is difficult and biopsy is generally required. Fortunately, recent advances and extensive applications of hepatobiliary-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging will facilitate the noninvasive identification and characterization of pre-HCC disease. This review briefly discusses the new concept of pre-HCC disease and offers an overview of the role of hepatobiliary-specific contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of pre-HCC disease.

Diagnostic efficacy of dynamic liver imaging using qualitative diagnostic algorithm versus LI-RADS v2018 lexicon for atypical versus classical HCC lesions: A decade of experience from a tertiary liver institute

OBJECTIVE

To analyze and evaluate the diagnostic performance of conventional diagnostic (qualitative) imaging features versus LI-RADSv2018 lexicon for indeterminate and atypical Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on dynamic liver imaging with reference to histopathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study (June 2009-June 2019) evaluated the performance characteristics of conventional imaging findings, versus the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LIRADS) v2018, for interpretation of indeterminate and atypical HCC, in patients who underwent subsequent histopathological analysis (gold standard). A total of 100,457 dynamic hepatobiliary CT and MR examinations were performed over ten years at our institute. Using current international imaging guidelines, 3218 patients were found to have suspected liver cancer lesions on imaging. Classical enhancement pattern of typical HCC was seen in 2916 of these patients. These patients did not require further biopsy. We enrolled, the remaining (n = 302) patients, who underwent biopsy, into our study group. Two radiologists, blinded to pathology findings, reviewed and classified these lesions, in consensus, according to LI-RADS® lexicon and as per 'conventional' (Indeterminate, Atypical HCC, Classical HCC, other malignancies) imaging. The histopathology diagnosis was considered as the final diagnosis. Alpha feto protein (AFP) levels amongst various subgroups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed to calculate the efficacy of LIRADS versus qualitative imaging parameters in comparison with histopathology.

RESULTS

A total of n = 302 patients, [89 % men (n = 269), mean age 57.08 ± 12.43 years] underwent biopsy for suspected liver lesions. Qualitative imaging had 92.3 % (CI 88.53-94.91) sensitivity, 41.4 % (CI 25.51-59.26) specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.7 % (CI 90.11-96.02), negative predictive value (NPV) of 36.4 % (CI 22.19-53.38), positive likelihood ratio (PLHR) of 1.575 (CI 1.40-1.77) and negative likelihood ratio of (NLHR) 0.19 (CI 0.13-0.26). It correctly classified 87.4 % of lesions diagnosed on pathology. In comparison, LI-RADS was found to have 92 % sensitivity, 55.5 % specificity, 97 % PPV, 30.3 %, NPV, PLHR 2.068 (CI 1.62-2.64), NLHR 0.15 (CI 0.11-0.18) and 89.7 % diagnostic accuracy. A total of 38 patients (17 false negative, 21 false positive lesions) had discordant diagnoses on imaging versus histopathology. The kappa agreement between LIRADs and qualitative Imaging was found to be 0.77 ± .07 (p < 0.001). LIRADS and qualitative imaging collectively had 97 % sensitivity, 30 % specificity, 91.9 % PPV, 55.6 % NPV, PLHR of 1.39 (CI 1.27-1.51) and NLHR of 0.09 (0.048-0.19) which was better than, either reporting system, independently.

CONCLUSION

It was observed that the LI-RADS v2018 lexicon with qualitative imaging as a combination technique added extra value in interpretation of atypical HCC or indeterminate lesions on dynamic CT and MRI compared to either as 'stand- alone' reporting systems.

Differentiation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Dysplastic Nodules in Cirrhotic Liver: Texture Analysis Based on MRI Improved Performance in Comparison Over Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MR and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Background: Accurate characterization of small (3 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) and dysplastic nodules (DNs) in cirrhotic liver is challenging. We aimed to investigate whether texture analysis (TA) based on T2-weighted images (T2WI) is superior to qualitative diagnosis using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing sHCC from DNs in cirrhosis.

Materials and methods: Sixty-eight patients with 73 liver nodules (46 HCCs, 27 DNs) pathologically confirmed by operation were included. For imaging diagnosis, three sets of images were reviewed by two experienced radiologists in consensus: a Gd-EOB-MRI set, a DWI set, and a combined set (combination of Gd-EOB-MRI and DWI). For TA, 279 texture features resulting from T2WI were extracted for each lesion. The performance of each approach was evaluated by a receiver operating characteristic analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A_z), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined.

Results: The performance of TA (A_z = 0.96) was significantly higher than that of imaging diagnosis using Gd-EOB-MRI set (A_z = 0.86) or DWI set (A_z = 0.80) alone in differentiation of sHCC from DNs (P = 0.008 and 0.025, respectively). The combination of Gd-EOB-MRI and DWI showed a greater sensitivity (95.6%) but reduced specificity (66.7%). The specificity of TA (92.6%) was significantly higher than that of the combined set (P < 0.001), but no significant difference was observed in sensitivity (97.8 vs. 95.6%, P = 0.559).

Conclusion: TA-based T2WI showed a better classification performance than that of qualitative diagnosis using Gd-EOB-MRI and DW imaging in differentiation of sHCCs from DNs in cirrhotic liver. TA-based MRI may become a potential imaging biomarker for the early differentiation HCCs from DNs in cirrhosis.

Microvascular Invasion in HCC: The Molecular Imaging Perspective

Hepatocellular carcinoma represents the most frequent primary liver tumor; curative options are only surgical resection and liver transplantation. From 1996, Milan Criteria are applied in consideration of patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular for liver transplantation; nonetheless, more recently, Milan Criteria have been criticized because they appear over conservative. Apart from number and size of lesions and biomarker levels, which already have been associated with poorer prognosis, overall survival and recurrence rates after transplantation are affected also by the presence of vascular invasion. Microvascular invasion suggests a poor prognosis but it is often hard to detect before transplant. Diagnostic imaging and tumor markers may play an important role and become the main tools to define microvascular invasion. In particular, a possible role could be found for computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. In this paper, we analyze the possible role of positron emission tomography as a preoperative imaging biomarker capable of predicting microvascular invasion in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and thus selecting optimal candidates for liver transplantation.

MR with Gd-EOB-DTPA in assessment of liver nodules in cirrhotic patients

To date the imaging diagnosis of liver lesions is based mainly on the identification of vascular features, which are typical of overt hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex and multistep event during which, a spectrum of nodules develop within the liver parenchyma, including benign small and large regenerative nodule (RN), low-grade dysplastic nodule (LGDN), high-grade dysplastic nodule (HGDN), early HCC, and well differentiated HCC. These nodules may be characterised not only on the basis of their respective different blood supplies, but also on their different hepatocyte function. Recently, in liver imaging the introduction of hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent offered the clinicians the possibility to obtain, at once, information not only related to the vascular changes of liver nodules but also information on hepatocyte function. For this reasons this new approach becomes the most relevant diagnostic clue for differentiating low-risk nodules (LGDN-RN) from high-risk nodules (HGDN/early HCC or overt HCC) and consequently new diagnostic algorithms for HCC have been proposed. The use of hepatobiliary contrast agents is constantly increasing and gradually changing the standard of diagnosis of HCC. The main purpose of this review is to underline the added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA in early-stage diagnoses of HCC. We also analyse the guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCC, the key concepts of HCC development, growth and spread and the imaging appearance of precursor nodules that eventually may transform into overt HCC.

CT-MRI LI-RADS v2017: A Comprehensive Guide for Beginners

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deceases worldwide. Early diagnosis is essential for correct management and improvement of prognosis. Proposed for the first time in 2011 and updated for the last time in 2017, the Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardized interpretation and reporting of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver examinations, endorsed by the American College of Radiology to achieve congruence with HCC diagnostic criteria in at-risk populations. Understanding its algorithm is fundamental to correctly apply LI-RADS in clinical practice. In this pictorial review, we provide a guide for beginners, explaining LI-RADS indications, describing major and ancillary features and eventually elucidating the diagnostic algorithm with the use of some clinical examples.