Impact of co-infection by hepatitis C virus on immunological and virological response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-positive patients

Plasma proteomic profiles of patients with HIV infection and coinfection with hepatitis B/C virus undergoing anti‑retroviral therapy

Chronic liver disease is becoming a leading cause of illness and mortality in patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PLWH) undergoing suppressive anti-retroviral therapy. Its primary etiology is coinfection with hepatitis B and C virus (HBV and HCV, respectively). Chronic liver inflammation and fibrosis can potentially lead to the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, monitoring of the disease progression in PLWH is required. The present study aimed to explore plasma protein profiles of PLWH and those coinfected with HBV and HCV using shotgun proteomics. HIV-monoinfected, HIV/HBV-coinfected, HIV/HCV-coinfected and uninfected control individuals were recruited. Patients in the three virus-infected groups had significantly higher levels of liver fibrosis indices (fibrosis-4 score and aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index) compared with the control group. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of plasma samples identified 1,074 proteins that were differentially expressed, where subsequent partial least squares-discriminant analysis model demonstrated clear clustering of proteomes from the four sample groups; 18 proteins that were significantly differentially expressed. Heatmap analysis identified two main groups of proteins, six proteins being upregulated only in the HIV/HBV-coinfection group and 10 proteins downregulated in all three virally infected groups. STITCH 5.0 analysis predicted an interaction network containing two identified proteins in the latter group, specifically ubiquitin interaction motif-containing 1 (UIMC1) and haptoglobin (HP), which are part of the profibrogenic TGF-1β/SMAD, inflammatory TNF and tumor suppressor BRCA1 pathways. Expression levels of UIMC1 and HP were significantly lower in HIV-infected groups compared with those in uninfected controls. Altogether, these proteomics data provide protein expression profiles potentially associated with HIV infection and coinfection with HBV/HCV, which may be applied to predict progression to advanced liver disease or HCC in PLWH.

Association of serum lipid profile with liver fibrosis in HCV‑coinfected HIV patients on suppressive anti‑retroviral therapy

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection in individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PLWH) may affect lipid metabolism and accelerate the progression of chronic hepatitis. Therefore, the identification of risk factors for progressive liver disease is needed. The present study aimed to examine the prevalence and clinical features associated with liver fibrosis in HCV-coinfected HIV patients, including metabolic markers. A total of 105 patients coinfected with HIV and HCV were recruited and liver fibrosis was assessed using the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI). Logistic regression analyses indicated that patients aged >50 years and with a CD4+ cell count <350 cells/µl had an 11.4-times higher (P=0.001) and a 5.7-times higher (P=0.017) risk of liver fibrosis, as determined by FIB-4 score, compared to patients aged ≤40 years and a CD4+ cell count of ≥350 cells/µl, respectively. In addition, patients naïve to HCV treatment or receiving treatment had 5.4- and 12.7-times higher risks for liver fibrosis, as determined by APRI, than those with sustained virologic response (SVR) (P=0.003 and P=0.033, respectively). Univariate analysis indicated lower risks of liver fibrosis, as determined by APRI, in the patients with abnormally high levels of cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) than those with normal levels [odds ratio (OR) 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-0.9, P=0.037; OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, P=0.041; OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5, P=0.001] and multivariate analysis suggested only patients with high levels of LDL had a lower risk for liver fibrosis determined by APRI (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.3-0.8, P=0.029). Consistently, serum levels of cholesterol, HDL and LDL were significantly lower in the patient groups with more advanced fibrosis, evaluated by FIB-4 score and APRI, than those without liver fibrosis and the levels of cholesterol and LDL in the patients achieving SVR were higher than those with no response or not receiving treatment (all P<0.05). In conclusion, the present study identified serum lipid levels as associated factors of hepatic fibrosis, together with age, CD4+ cell count and HCV treatment status, in HCV-coinfected PLWH on long-term suppressive anti-retroviral therapy.

Impact of hepatitis C cure on risk of mortality and morbidity in people with HIV after antiretroviral therapy initiation

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in people with HIV (PWH). Sustained virological response (SVR) decreases the risk of HCV-associated morbidity. We compared mortality, risk of AIDS-defining events, and non-AIDS nonliver (NANL) cancers between HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR and mono-infected PWH.

DESIGN

Adult PWH from 21 cohorts in Europe and North America that collected HCV treatment data were eligible if they were HCV-free at the time of ART initiation.

METHODS

Up to 10 mono-infected PWH were matched (on age, sex, date of ART start, HIV acquisition route, and being followed at the time of SVR) to each HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR. Cox models were used to estimate relative hazards (hazard ratio) of all-cause mortality, AIDS-defining events, and NANL cancers after adjustment.

RESULTS

Among 62 495 PWH, 2756 acquired HCV, of whom 649 reached SVR. For 582 of these, at least one mono-infected PWH could be matched, producing a total of 5062 mono-infected PWH. The estimated hazard ratios comparing HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR with mono-infected PWH were 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.73] for mortality, 0.85 [0.42-1.74] for AIDS-defining events, and 1.21 [0.86-1.72] for NANL cancer.

CONCLUSION

PWH who reached SVR a short time after HCV acquisition were not at higher risk of overall mortality compared with mono-infected PWH. However, the apparent higher risk of NANL cancers in HCV-co-infected PWH who reached SVR after a DAA-based treatment compared with mono-infected PWH, though compatible with a null association, suggests a need for monitoring of those events following SVR.

Hepatitis B and C viral coinfections and their association with HIV viral load suppression among HIV-1 infected patients on ART at Mekelle hospital, northern Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Although Ethiopia is endemic to viral hepatitis and HIV, data that could guide population-specific interventions are limited. In this study, we determined the seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) and assessed their associations with HIV-1 viral load suppression among HIV-1 infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at Mekelle hospital in northern Ethiopia.

METHODS

Between February and April 2020, blood samples were collected from 439 participants. Samples were screened for HBsAg and anti-HCV on the immunochromatographic test and confirmed using the Enzyme-Linked Immuno-sorbent assay (Beijing Wantai Co. China). HIV-1 viral load was quantified using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on the Abbott platform. Binary and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify potential predictors.

RESULTS

Overall, 10% (44/439) and 3.6% (16/439) of the participants were coinfected with HBV and HCV, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, being illiterate (AOR = 6.57; 95% CI 1.04-41.6), and having a history of sexually transmitted infections (AOR = 4.44; 95% CI 1.31-15.0) and multiple sexual partners (AOR = 29.9; 95% CI 7.82-114.8) were associated with HBV infection. On the other hand, participants with a history of chronic non-communicable diseases (AOR = 10.6, 95% CI 1.61-70.1), and those reporting a history of sexually transmitted infections (AOR = 5.21, 95% CI 1.39-19.5) were more likely to be infected with HCV. In further analysis, HCV infection status was significantly associated with decreased viral load suppression rate (AOR = 7.14; 95% CI 2.18-23.3) whereas no significant association was observed with the HBV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

The HBV coinfection rate in our study is high and, as per WHO's standard, corresponds to a hyperendemic level. The HCV coinfection rate is also substantially high and urges attention given its influence on the viral load suppression of HIV patients on ART at our study site. Our findings suggest the need to adopt universal screening and vaccination of people with HIV against HBV and screening for HCV at our study site and in Ethiopia at large, which contributes to Ethiopia's progress towards the 2030 global target of reducing the HBV infection.

Compartmentalization of Resistance-Associated Substitutions in HIV/HCV-Infected Patients: Possible Correlation with Infecting HCV Genotype

Resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) may exist prior to treatment and contribute to the failure of treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). As the major site of HCV replication, naturally occurring variants with RASs may segregate into the liver. In the present study, we performed viral population sequencing to retrospectively investigate the NS3 and NS5A RAS profiles in 34 HIV/HCV coinfected patients naïve to anti-HCV treatment who underwent diagnostic liver biopsy between 2000 and 2006 and had liver and plasma samples available. Sixteen were infected by HCV genotype (GT) 1a, 11 by GT3a, and 7 by GT4d. The analysis of the NS3 domain in GT1a showed a difference in strain between the liver and plasma in three cases, with a preponderance of specific RASs in the liver compartment. In GT4d samples, 6/7 coupled liver and plasma samples were concordant with no RASs. Sequence analysis of the NS5A domain showed the presence of RASs in the livers of 2/16 patients harboring GT1a but not in the corresponding plasma. In GT4d, NS5A RASs were detected in 7/7 liver tissues and 5/7 plasma samples. NS3 domain and NS5A domain were found to be conserved in plasma and livers of patients infected with GT3a. Thus, RASs within GT1a and GT4d more likely segregate into the liver and may explain the emergence of resistant strains during DAA treatment.

Very high baseline HIV viremia impairs efficacy of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based ART: a long-term observation in treatment-naïve patients

BACKGROUND

It is not completely clear whether a very high pre-therapy viral load (≥ 500 000 copies/ml) can impair the virological response. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of very high baseline HIV-RNA levels on long-term virological responses under one type of regimen.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed based on data from two multicenter cohorts in China from January to November 2009, and from May 2013 to December 2015. Untreated HIV infected adults between 18 and 65 years old were recruited before receiving non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen. All patients had baseline HIV-RNA levels over 500 copies/ml, good adherence, and were followed for at least 24 weeks. Virological suppression was defined as the first HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml. Virological failure was defined as any of incomplete viral suppression (HIV-RNA ≥ 200 copies/ml without virological suppression within 24 weeks of treatment) and viral rebound (confirmed HIV-RNA level ≥ 50 copies/ml after virological suppression). Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards model and Logistic regression were used to compare virological response between each pretreated viral load stratum.

RESULTS

A total of 758 treatment-naïve HIV patients in China were enlisted. Median follow-up time (IQR) was 144 (108-276) weeks. By week 48, rates of virological suppression in three groups (< 100 000, 100 000-500 000 and ≥ 500 000 copies/ml) were 94.1, 85.0, and 63.8%, respectively (P < 0.001). Very high baseline HIV viremia over 500 000 copies/ml were found to be associated with delayed virological suppression (≥ 500 000 vs <  100 000, adjusted relative hazard = 0.455, 95% CI: 0.32-0.65; P < 0.001) as well as incomplete viral suppression (≥ 500 000 vs < 100 000, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.084, 95% CI: 2.761-13.407; P < 0.001) and viral rebound (≥ 50 000 vs < 100 000, aOR = 3.671, 95% CI: 1.009-13.355, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Very high levels of pre-treatment HIV-RNA were related with delayed efficacy of NNRTI-based ART and increased risk of treatment failure. More potent initial regimens should be considered for those with this clinical character.

Hepatitis B and C virus infection among HIV patients within the public and private healthcare systems in Chile: A cross-sectional serosurvey

BACKGROUND

Coinfections of HIV patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are mayor public health problems, contributing to the emerging burden of HIV-associated hepatic mortality. Coinfection rates vary geographically, depending on various factors such as predominant transmission modes, HBV vaccination rates, and prevalence of HBV and HCV in the general population. In South America, the epidemiology of coinfections is uncertain, since systematic studies are scarce. Our study aimed to analyze rates of HBV and HCV infection in people living with HIV attending centers of the public and private health system in Chile.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study including a public university hospital and a private health center in Santiago, Metropolitan Region in Chile. Serum samples were used to determine serological markers of hepatitis B (HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc total, HBeAg, anti-HBe) and anti-HCV. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained from medical records.

RESULTS

399 patients were included (353 from public, 46 from private health center). Most (92.8%) were male, with a median age of 38.3 years; 99.4% acquired HIV through sexual contact (75.0% MSM); 25.7% had AIDS and 90.4% were on ART. In 78.9%, viral loads were <40 cps/mL; the median CD4 cell count was 468 cells/mm3. According to their serological status, 37.6% of patients were HBV naïve (susceptible), 6.5% were vaccinated, 43.6% had resolved HBV infection, and 5.8% were chronically infected. The rate of vaccination was 4.5% in the public and 21.7% in the private system. HCV coinfection was found in 1.0% of all patients.

CONCLUSION

HBV coinfection rate was within the range of other South American countries, but lower than in non-industrialized regions in Asia and Africa. A low percentage of patients were HBV vaccinated, especially within the public system. HCV coinfection rate was very low, most probably due to the rareness of injecting drug use.

Pharmacologic management of HCV treatment in patients with HCV monoinfection vs. HIV/HCV coinfection: Does coinfection really matter?

Introduction

Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) monoinfection and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfection treated with direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy are similar in clinical trials. The objective of this study was to examine differences in patient characteristics, drug-drug interactions, and treatment pathways between these groups in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods

We performed an ambispective review of patients prescribed DAA therapy between September 2015 and April 2018 at a tertiary academic center. The primary endpoint was time from a decision to treat to treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints included patient characteristics; frequency and type of DAA medication interactions; frequency, type, and timing of antiretroviral therapy (ART) changes; and treatment outcomes.

Results

Three hundred and twelve patients were included. Almost half (43%) were HIV/HCV coinfected. Patients with HIV/HCV coinfection were more likely to be African American (p<0.001), have a diagnosed psychiatric disorder (p<0.001) and have a higher pill burden (p = 0.014). Patients with HIV/HCV coinfection were more likely to report an alcohol abuse history (p<0.001), injection drug use history (p<0.024), or active use of illicit substances (p = 0.019). In a multivariable regression model assessing the primary endpoint, time to treatment initiation was increased in patients requiring a change in ART therapy (OR = 9.2, p < 0.001) or a non-ART medication adjustment (OR = 2.4, p = 0.003), and in patients with Medicaid (OR = 6.7, p < 0.001). After controlling for all these factors, HIV/HCV coinfection still significantly impacted time to treatment initiation (OR = 1.7, p = 0.020). The groups had similar rates of drug interaction frequency, treatment completion, observed SVR, and side effects.

Conclusions

Patients with HIV/HCV coinfection are more likely to have a variety of factors that add complexities to HCV treatment. In addition to these challenges, patients with HIV/HCV coinfection experience a longer time to treatment initiation while patients with HCV monoinfection were more frequently lost to care. Care delivery models may incorporate this data to improve patient engagement, access, and outcomes.

Human immunodeficiency virus and hepatotropic viruses co-morbidities as the inducers of liver injury progression

Hepatotropic viruses induced hepatitis progresses much faster and causes more liver- related health problems in people co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although treatment with antiretroviral therapy has extended the life expectancy of people with HIV, liver disease induced by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes significant numbers of non-acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related deaths in co-infected patients. In recent years, new insights into the mechanisms of accelerated fibrosis and liver disease progression in HIV/HCV and HIV/HBV co-infections have been reported. In this paper, we review recent studies examining the natural history and pathogenesis of liver disease in HIV-HCV/HBV co-infection in the era of direct acting antivirals (DAA) and antiretroviral therapy (ART). We also review the novel therapeutics for management of HIV/HCV and HIV/HBV co-infected individuals.