Comparative efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide in the induction treatment of lupus nephritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Association Between Mycophenolate Mofetil Use and Subsequent Infections Among Hospitalized Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nested Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

The association between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and infection in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has not been clarified. This study evaluated the degree and factors in effect of MMF use on infection in patients with SLE.

METHODS

A hospitalized-based observational study was conducted to collect medical records on patients with SLE during 2010-2021. A nested case-control study was performed among 3339 patients with SLE, including 1577 cases and 1762 controls by whether they developed any type of infection. The exposure of MMF use was determined within 1 year before diagnosed infection or the end of follow-up. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for association between MMF and subsequent infection.

RESULTS

MMF was significantly associated with the risk of overall infection (adjusted OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.48-2.44) and different types of infections, including bacterial infection (adjusted OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.55-2.75), viral infection (adjusted OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-3.01), and opportunistic infection (adjusted OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.31-3.46). The top three risks of specific types of infections were bacteremia/septicemia, urinary tract infection/pyelonephritis, and herpes zoster. Stratification analysis showed risk of overall infection increased especially in MMF users with age over 55 years, diabetes, central nervous system involvement, and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, the risk of infection increased with increasing dosage and duration of MMF use. Additionally, the combination of MMF with CYC and other immunosuppressants significantly increases the risk of infections compared to using a single one.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF use is associated with various type of infections in patients with SLE, particularly in those with longer use, older age, complications with comorbidities, and concomitant use of CYC or other immunosuppressants.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil as induction treatment and low-dose tacrolimus as treatment for lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as induction therapy and low-dose tacrolimus as treatment for lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus and MMF as induction therapy for LN. We systematically reviewed RCTs and prospective cohort studies with a tacrolimus dose of 3 mg daily and performed a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus as an induction treatment for LN in comparison to MMF.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were satisfied by eight studies (five RCTs and three prospective cohort studies) with a total of 408 individuals (289 for tacrolimus vs. MMF and 119 for low-dose tacrolimus). Tacrolimus and MMF had similar complete remission rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.028; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.589-1.796; p = 0.922). The partial remission rate did not differ between the tacrolimus and MMF groups (OR 1.400; 95% CI 0.741-2.646; p = 0.300). Tacrolimus and MMF showed no differences in proteinuria, serum albumin, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, renal Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), or extra-renal SLEDAI. The incidence of infection, severe infection, leukopenia, and hyperglycemia did not differ between the tacrolimus and MMF groups. However, herpes zoster infection was significantly less common in the tacrolimus group (OR 0.137; 95% CI 0.034-0.546; p = 0.005), whereas serum creatinine elevation was significantly higher in the tacrolimus group than in the MMF group (OR 8.148; 95% CI 1.369-48.50; p = 0.021). At 3 mg/d, tacrolimus was shown to be safe, well tolerated, and offered therapeutic benefits in all investigations.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus was comparable to MMF in terms of effectiveness and safety as an induction therapy for LN, with the exception of a reduced risk of herpes zoster infection and a rise in serum creatinine. In individuals with LN, 3 mg/d tacrolimus was proven to be efficacious and safe.

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Cyclophosphamide in Lupus Nephritis: Evidence from a Real-World Study

INTRODUCTION

Both mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and intravenous cyclophosphamide (CYC) have been recommended in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis (LN) for years; nevertheless, their effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting are extremely lacking. Therefore, we decided to conduct this real-world study.

METHODS

A total of 195 Chinese patients with LN who were initially treated with MMF (n = 98), or intravenous CYC (n = 97) as induction therapy were enrolled. All of the patients were followed up to 12 months. Complete renal remission (CRR) was defined as 24-h urinary protein (24 h-UTP) < 0.5 g, and partial renal remission (PRR) was defined as ≥ 50% reduction in 24 h-UTP to the subnephrotic level, however > 0.5 g, both with a change of serum creatinine (SCr) within 10% from baseline. The proportions of CRR, PRR, and total renal remission (TRR), as well as adverse events, were compared by Chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used for propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed.

RESULTS

The cumulative proportion of TRR in 6 months (79.4 vs. 63.8%, p = 0.026) and CRR in 12 months (72.8 vs. 57.6%, p = 0.049) in MMF group were significantly higher than CYC group, and the above conclusions were further confirmed by IPTW. The proportions of PRR, CRR, and TRR at other time points were equivalent between two groups. Further subgroup analysis in 111 patients with biopsy-proven III-V LN also showed a significantly higher proportion of TRR at 6 months in the MMF group than in the CYC group (78.3 vs. 56.9%, p = 0.026). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis and after IPTW, the MMF group showed better TRR and CRR responses than CYC group in 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that MMF use was the only predictor of CRR (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.90-4.09, p = 0.026), while low complement level was also a predictor, albeit risk was reduced (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.86, p = 0.019). Moreover, compared to the CYC group, MMF group patients were more likely to have significantly lower SCr (μmol/l) [72.5 (62.5, 86.5) vs. 79.0 (71.1, 97.5), p = 0.001] and daily dose of prednisone (mg/day) (15.7 ± 5.2 vs. 18.6 ± 11.3, p = 0.022) at 6 months; lower 24 h-UTP (g) [0.1 (0.1, 0.3) vs. 0.2 (0.1, 0.9), p = 0.005] and daily dose of prednisone (mg/day) (9.6 ± 3.3 vs. 11.2 ± 5.5, p = 0.023) at 12 months. Infection was the most common adverse event. Pneumonia and gastrointestinal discomfort were more frequently observed in the CYC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data are a key component of the evidence supporting the effectiveness of drugs and are of interest to all stakeholders. Our comparative study demonstrated the effectiveness of MMF in LN induction therapy was at least equivalent to intravenous CYC, with superior tolerance.

Comparison of mycophenolic acid with cyclophosphamide for the treatment of pediatric lupus nephritis: A retrospective study from a tertiary center hospital in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for treating pediatric lupus nephritis (pLN).

METHODS

Data on patients with pLN class III, IV, and V, diagnosed by renal biopsy, were collected from the Databank of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital between February 2005 and December 2020. The study included 31 pLN patients. Of these, 15 received MPA (MPA group) and 16 received CYC (CYC group). Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index score, laboratory findings, complete remission (CR), and partial remission (PR) were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

In the MPA group, CR occurred in 7/15 (47%) patients at month 6 and in 11/15 (73%) at months 12 and 24. In the CYC group, CR was reached in 5/16 (31%) patients at month 6, in 8/16 (50%) at month 12, and in 9/16 (56%) at month 24. PR was seen in 3/15 (20%) patients in the MPA group and in 3/16 (19%) in the CYC group at month 24. The cumulative probability of CR and PR showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. However, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved significantly in the MPA group at months 6, 12 and 24 compared to that in the CYC group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of MPA is similar to that of CYC for pLN treatment, with MPA providing a significant improvement in eGFR after pLN induction therapy at months 6,12 and 24.

Glucocorticoid discontinuation in pediatric-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoid discontinuation, a challenge in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), might be achievable with the advent of new therapeutic options.

METHODS

This single-center study included 31 children with newly diagnosed pediatric SLE between 2002 and 2021, after the exclusion of patients who were followed for less than 1 year after treatment initiation and those lost to follow-up. Patient characteristics, clinical course including flares, treatment, glucocorticoid discontinuation, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Glucocorticoids could be discontinued in 19 (61%) patients during a median observation period of 105.5 (range, 17-221) months. Of these, 5 (26%), 12 (63%), and 18 (95%) patients could discontinue glucocorticoids in 3, 5, and 10 years from treatment initiation, respectively. Additionally, 18 of the 19 patients did not experience flares after glucocorticoid discontinuation during a median duration of 37.2 (7.2-106.8) months. Three of the nineteen patients achieved drug-free remission. At last follow-up, all patients achieved low disease activity with or without glucocorticoids and 19, 8, and 1 patient were receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), MMF plus tacrolimus, and MMF plus ciclosporin A, respectively. Flares were observed in 15 patients during the observation period. MMF as initial immunosuppressant (P = 0.01) and shorter interval between therapy initiation and achieving maintenance prednisolone dose of 0.1-0.15 mg/kg/day (P = 0.001) were associated with significantly reduced flare risk. Femoral head necrosis was observed in two patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small sample size, these results support glucocorticoid discontinuation as a therapeutic target in pediatric SLE.

Should Renal Inflammation Be Targeted While Treating Hypertension?

Despite extensive research and a plethora of therapeutic options, hypertension continues to be a global burden. Understanding of the pathological roles of known and underexplored cellular and molecular pathways in the development and maintenance of hypertension is critical to advance the field. Immune system overactivation and inflammation in the kidneys are proposed alternative mechanisms of hypertension, and resistant hypertension. Consideration of the pathophysiology of hypertension in chronic inflammatory conditions such as autoimmune diseases, in which patients present with autoimmune-mediated kidney inflammation as well as hypertension, may reveal possible contributors and novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we 1) summarize current therapies used to control blood pressure and their known effects on inflammation; 2) provide evidence on the need to target renal inflammation, specifically, and especially when first-line and combinatory treatment efforts fail; and 3) discuss the efficacy of therapies used to treat autoimmune diseases with a hypertension/renal component. We aim to elucidate the potential of targeting renal inflammation in certain subsets of patients resistant to current therapies.

Cost-effectiveness of cyclophosphamide and non-cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of Malaysian lupus nephritis patients

BACKGROUND

There is a paradigm shift in the induction therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). Apart from cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitors have emerged as an alternative option of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) per year, adverse events and renal damage at 24 months between CYC and non-CYC agents (calcineurin inhibitors or mycophenolate) as induction treatment among proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective and non-controlled study involving biopsy-proven proliferative LN patients (class III or IV with or without V) in the clinic registry from 2017 to 2019. Their medical records were reviewed to determine the date and type of induction, treatment effectiveness, adverse events and renal damage at 24 months. The total cost of treatment included capital cost (building, furniture and equipment) and recurrent cost (emolument, supply/drug, lab investigations, administrative cost and utilities). Treatment effectiveness was defined as renal remission (partial or complete) at 6 months without relapse up to 24 months. The cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was expressed as cost per remission per year in Malaysian Ringgit (MYR).

RESULTS

There were a total of 95 inductions with CYC and 27 with non-CYC in 94 LN patients. There was no significant difference in the total mean cost per patient/year between CYC (MYR 18460.26 ± 6500.76) compared to non-CYC (MYR 19302.10 ± 6778.22), p = 0.569. The CEA for CYC was MYR 20,632.06 (GBP 3,538.78) while non-CYC was MYR 20,846.27 (GBP 3,575.52) and mean difference MYR 214.21 (GBP 37.44). There was significantly higher capital cost, consumables, utility, maintenance, administration (p < 0.001) and lab investigations (p = 0.046) in the CYC arm. There was a trend of a higher infection requiring outpatient antibiotic treatment in CYC group (p = 0.05), but similar renal damage outcome with the non-CYC group.Conclusion: For treatment of proliferative LN, there was no significant difference in the CEA and renal damage between CYC and non-CYC induction treatment. There was a trend of a higher rate of infections in the CYC group. Hence, the decision to treat patient with CYC or MMF should be tailored to individual patients, by considering the risk of infection in a particular patient.

Lupus Vasculitis: An Overview

Lupus vasculitis (LV) is one of the secondary vasculitides occurring in the setting of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in approximately 50% of patients. It is most commonly associated with small vessels, but medium-sized vessels can also be affected, whereas large vessel involvement is very rare. LV may involve different organ systems and present in a wide variety of clinical manifestations according to the size and site of the vessels involved. LV usually portends a poor prognosis, and a prompt diagnosis is fundamental for a good outcome. The spectrum of involvement ranges from a relatively mild disease affecting small vessels or a single organ to a multiorgan system disease with life-threatening manifestations, such as mesenteric vasculitis, pulmonary hemorrhage, or mononeuritis multiplex. Treatment depends upon the organs involved and the severity of the vasculitis process. In this review, we provide an overview of the different forms of LV, describing their clinical impact and focusing on the available treatment strategies.

COVID-19 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: lessons learned from the inflammatory disease

As the world navigates the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is a growing need to assess its impact in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients with SLE are a unique population when considering the risk of contracting COVID-19 and infection outcomes. The use of systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, and underlying organ damage from SLE are potential susceptibility factors. Most patients with SLE have evidence of high type I interferon activity, which may theoretically act as an antiviral line of defense or contribute to the development of a deleterious hyperinflammatory response in COVID-19. Other immunopathogenic mechanisms of SLE may overlap with those described in COVID-19, thus, studies in SLE could provide some insight into immune responses occurring in severe cases of the viral infection. We reviewed the literature to date on COVID-19 in patients with SLE and provide an in-depth review of current research in the area, including immune pathway activation, epidemiology, clinical features, outcomes, and the psychosocial impact of the pandemic in those with autoimmune disease.