The comparison of the efficacy of pegylated interferon α-2a and α-2b in chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1

Discovery of Beclabuvir: A Potent Allosteric Inhibitor of the Hepatitis C Virus Polymerase

The discovery of beclabuvir occurred through an iterative series of structure-activity relationship studies directed at the optimization of a novel class of indolobenzazepines. Within this research, a strategic decision to abandon a highly potent but physiochemically problematic series in favor of one of lower molecular weight and potency was key in the realization of the program’s objectives. Subsequent cycles of analog design incorporating progressive conformational constraints successfully addressed off-target liabilities and identified compounds with improved physiochemical profiles. Ultimately, a class of alkyl-bridged piperazine carboxamides was found to be of particular interest, and from this series, beclabuvir was identified as having superior antiviral, safety, and pharmacokinetic properties. The clinical evaluation of beclabuvir in combination with both the NS5A replication complex inhibitor daclatasvir and the NS3 protease inhibitor asunaprevir in a single, fixed-dose formulation (Ximency) resulted in the approval by the Japanese Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau for its use in the treatment of patients infected with genotype 1 HCV.

Evaluation of Dual Therapy in Real Life Setting in Treatment-Naïve Turkish Patients with HCV Infection: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Before the introduction of direct-acting antivirals in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients, the combination of peginterferon alpha and ribavirin was the standard therapy. Observational studies that investigated sustained virological response (SVR) rates by these drugs yielded different outcomes.

AIMS

The goal of the study was to demonstrate real life data concerning SVR rate achieved by peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin in patients who were treatment-naïve.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, retrospective observational study.

METHODS

The study was conducted retrospectively on 1214 treatment naïve-patients, being treated with peginterferon alpha-2a or 2b plus ribavirin in respect of the current guidelines between 2005 and 2013. The patients' data were collected from 22 centers via a standard form, which has been prepared for this study. The data included demographic and clinical characteristics (gender, age, body weight, initial Hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV RNA) level, disease staging) as well as course of treatment (duration of treatment, outcomes, discontinuations and adverse events). Renal insufficiency, decompensated liver disease, history of transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy or autoimmune liver disease were exclusion criteria for the study. Treatment efficacy was assessed according to the patient's demographic characteristics, baseline viral load, genotype, and fibrosis scores.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 50.74 (±0.64) years. Most of them were infected with genotype 1 (91.8%). SVR was achieved in 761 (62.7%) patients. SVR rate was 59.1% in genotype 1, 89.4% in genotype 2, 93.8% in genotype 3, and 33.3% in genotype 4 patients. Patients with lower viral load yielded higher SVR (65.8% vs. 58.4%, p=0.09). SVR rates according to histologic severity were found to be 69.3%, 66.3%, 59.9%, 47.3%, and 45.5% in patients with fibrosis stage 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The predictors of SVR were male gender, genotype 2/3, age less than 45 years, low fibrosis stage, low baseline viral load and presence of early virological response. SVR rates to each peginterferon were found to be similar in genotype 1/4 although SVR rates were found to be higher for peginterferon alpha-2b in patients with genotype 2/3. The number of patients who failed to complete treatment due to adverse effects was 33 (2.7%). The number of patients failed to complete treatment due to adverse effects was 33 (2.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that the rate of SVR to dual therapy was higher in treatment-naïve Turkish patients than that reported in randomized controlled trials. Also peginterferon alpha-2a and alpha-2b were found to be similar in terms of SVR in genotype 1 patients.

Relative efficacy and safety of simeprevir and telaprevir in treatment-naïve hepatitis C-infected patients in a Japanese population: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

AIM

Simeprevir (SMV) is an oral, once-daily protease inhibitor for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. In phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted in Japan, SMV, in combination with peginterferon-α and ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV), demonstrated potent efficacy in HCV genotype 1-infected patients relative to PEG IFN/RBV and was generally well tolerated. Telaprevir (TVR) in combination with PEG IFN/RBV is licensed for the treatment of HCV in Japan. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons of TVR and SMV in a Japanese population, we undertook a network meta-analysis (NMA) to examine the relative efficacy and safety of SMV and TVR in combination with PEG IFN/RBV.

METHODS

A systematic review identified SMV and TVR RCT in Japanese treatment-naïve patients. Bayesian NMA was performed assuming fixed study effects.

RESULTS

Three studies met our inclusion criteria: two SMV and one TVR. SMV showed a higher mean odds ratio (OR) of achieving SVR versus TVR (OR, 1.68 (95% credible interval 0.66-4.26)). SMV showed a lower mean OR of discontinuation: overall, 0.35 (0.12-1.00); and due to AE, 0.87 (0.23-3.34) versus TVR. SMV showed a lower mean OR of experiencing anemia 0.20 (0.07-0.56) and rash 0.41 (0.17-0.99) but a higher mean OR of experiencing pruritus 1.26 (0.46-3.47) versus TVR.

CONCLUSION

In this indirect treatment comparison, SMV, in combination with PEG IFN/RBV, showed a favorable risk-benefit profile compared with TVR with PEG IFN/RBV in Japanese treatment-naïve HCV patients.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Peginterferon alpha-2a and Peginterferon alpha-2b in Iranian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Nearly 0.5% of Iranians are infected with HCV. Peginterferon-alpha-2a and Peginterferon-alpha-2b are the two available types of interferon for the treatment of hepatitis C. Comparing the results of these two treatments is still a challenge.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the results of Peginterferon-alpha-2a and Peginterferon-alpha-2b in Iranian patients with chronic hepatitis C.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

289 patients with chronic hepatitis C attending Tehran Hepatitis Center (THC) and Hepatitis Clinic of Tehran Blood Transfusion Organization (TBTO) from January 2008 to April 2013 and treated with combination of Peginterferon-alpha-2a or Peginterferon-alpha-2b plus Ribavirin were enrolled in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Treatment response and side effects were compared.

RESULTS

Among all naive patients, 82.0% achieved SVR, 5.4% were resistant to therapy and 11.0% withdrew the treatment. Relapse was seen in 12.2% of naive patients who finished the course of treatment. RVR and EVR were seen in 67.7% and 90.6% of naive patients, respectively. Patients divided into two groups. Group A consists of 247 patients treated with Peginterferon-alpha-2a and group B 42 patients treated with Peginterferon-alpha-2b. No significant difference in treatment response was observed between naive patients of the two groups. The rates of arthralgia/myalgia, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, dyspnea and anorexia were higher in group A and the rates of dermal problems, coryza and bleeding were higher in group B. In a subgroup analysis, the two kinds of Peginterferon-alpha-2a available in Iran were compared. Rapid and early viral responses and relapse rates were lower in the one made in Iran and the long-term responses were not different. The rates of arthralgia/myalgia, fever, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, dyspnea, anorexia, cough, headache and abdominal pain were higher and the rates of irritability and coryza were lower in the one made in Iran.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the efficacy of Peginterferon-alpha-2a and Peginterferon-alpha-2b in Iranian patients. Physicians might choose the treatment regimen for every individual concerning the differences in side effects of Peginterferons.

Optimizing treatment for HCV genotype 4: PEG-IFN alfa 2a vs. PEG-IFN alfa 2b; the debate continues

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Combined therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin is the current standard of care treatment for HCV genotype 4. Two types of PEG-IFN are commercially available. The limited number of trials that were conducted for HCV genotype 4 and the few head to head comparisons make it impossible to know which is the best option? In this article we review all available PEG-IFN trials performed worldwide for HCV genotype 4 since 2004. Unless another molecule is developed as a standalone for the treatment of HCV, PEG-IFN will continue to be a source of debate.

Discovery and preclinical characterization of the cyclopropylindolobenzazepine BMS-791325, a potent allosteric inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase

Described herein are structure-activity relationship studies that resulted in the optimization of the activity of members of a class of cyclopropyl-fused indolobenzazepine HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitors. Subsequent iterations of analogue design and syntheses successfully addressed off-target activities, most notably human pregnane X receptor (hPXR) transactivation, and led to significant improvements in the physicochemical properties of lead compounds. Those analogues exhibiting improved solubility and membrane permeability were shown to have notably enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles. Additionally, a series of alkyl bridged piperazine carboxamides was identified as being of particular interest, and from which the compound BMS-791325 (2) was found to have distinguishing antiviral, safety, and pharmacokinetic properties that resulted in its selection for clinical evaluation.

Alanine aminotransferase normalization at week 8 predicts viral response during hepatitis C treatment

AIM: To investigate alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) during peginterferon-ribavirin treatment.

METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one genotype 1 CHC patients underwent treatment for 48 wk with peginterferon and ribavirin, and were retrospectively divided into two groups as having a rapid virological response (RVR) (Group 1, n = 52) and not having an RVR (Group 2, n = 99). We also subdivided each group into two according to the initial ALT level being high (Group 1h and Group 2h) or normal (Group 1n and Group 2n). HCV RNA and ALT levels were measured at baseline; at 4, 12, 24 and 48 wk during the treatment period; and at 24 wk follow-up. ALT levels were also obtained at 8 wk. According to the results of ALT, patients were enrolled in either the follow-up abnormal or follow-up normalized ALT groups at each interval. Patients with high and normal ALT levels were compared for each interval in terms of SVR.

RESULTS: The SVR rates were 83% vs 40% (P = 0.000), 82% vs 84% (P = 0.830), and 37% vs 44% (P = 0.466) when comparing Group 1 with 2, 1h with 1n, and 2h with 2n, respectively. In Group 2h, the SVR rates were 34% vs 40% (P = 0.701), 11% vs 52% (P = 0.004), 12% vs 50% (P = 0.007), 7% vs 50% (P = 0.003), 6% vs 53% (P = 0.001), and 0% vs 64% (P = 0.000) when comparing patients with high and normalized ALT levels at week 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72, respectively. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that RVR (OR = 7.05; 95%CI: 3.1-16.05, P = 0.000), complete early virological response (cEVR) (OR = 17.55; 95%CI: 6.32-48.76, P = 0.000), normalization of ALT at 8 wk (OR = 3.04; 95%CI: 1.31-7.06, P = 0.008), and at 12 wk (OR = 4.21; 95%CI: 1.65-10.76, P = 0.002) were identified as independent significant predictive factors for SVR.

CONCLUSION: Normalization of ALT at 8 wk may predict viral response during peginterferon-ribavirin treatment in genotype-1 CHC patients especially without RVR.