Comparison of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment of Acquired Severe Aplastic Anemia in Pediatric Patients

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia: Evidence-Based Guidelines From the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Existing guidance about HCT in SAA is primarily derived from expert reviews, registry data and societal guidelines; however, transplant-specific guidelines for SAA are lacking. A panel of SAA experts, both pediatric and adult transplant physicians, developed consensus recommendations using Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology employing a GRADE guideline development tool. The panel agrees with previous recommendations for the preferential use of bone marrow as a graft source and the use of rabbit over horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for HCT conditioning. Fludarabine containing regimens are preferred for patients at high risk of graft failure and those receiving matched unrelated or haploidentical donor transplant. Given advancements in HCT, the panel does not endorse the historical 40-year age cut-off for considering upfront HCT in adults, acknowledging that fit older patients may also benefit from HCT. The panel also endorses increased utilization of HCT by prioritizing matched unrelated or haploidentical donor HCT over immunosuppressive therapy in children and adults who lack a matched related donor. Finally, the panel suggests either calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate or post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for matched related or matched unrelated donor recipients. These recommendations reflect a significant advancement in transplant strategies for SAA and highlight the importance of ongoing and further research to revisit current evidence in terms of donor choice, conditioning chemotherapy, GVHD prophylaxis and post-transplant immunosuppression.

Porcine Anti-Lymphocyte Globulin, Cyclosporine A Plus Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists Achieved Similar Efficacy and Survival Compared to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Aplastic Anemia

Background

Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with horse or rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (h-/r-ATG) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are two baseline treatments for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) and transfusion-dependent non-severe aplastic anemia (TD-NSAA) patients. Addition of thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) to standard IST therapy (h-/r-ATG) has greatly improved the survival of SAA, whereas porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin (p-ALG) combined with TPO-RAs still had a matter of debate.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the data of 48 AA patients in our center between 2020 and 2022, 23 AA patients received with p-ALG ± TPO-RAs, 25 AA patients underwent matched sibling donor (MSD-) or haploidentical (haplo-) HSCT.

Results

For patients in the HSCT group, the ORR was 90.9% which was significantly higher than that in the IST±TPO-RAs group (45.5%, P = 0.001) at 3 months; moreover, patients who underwent HSCT achieved faster transfusion independence, better CR rate, shorter time of recovery normal blood routine, and the percentage of normal blood routine (all P < 0.05) compared with IST±TPO-RAs group. However, the ORR were similary at 6 months in the two groups (95.5% vs 81.8% P = 0.342), with a median follow up of 19.8 months (range, 0.3-38.2 months), the 2-year FFS and OS in the two cohorts has no different. Subgroup analysis further indicated that the 2-year FFS and OS were similar between IST+TPO-RAs and haplo-HSCT subgroups, as well as in IST+TPO-RAs and MSD-HSCT cohorts. Moreover, the first-time hospitalizations were much more expensive in the HSCT group than in the IST±TPO-RAs group (402 756 vs. 292 902 yuan, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

P-ALG-based-IST±TPO-RAs is a good treatment option with similar FFS and OS compared to allo- HSCT for AA patients without the opportunity of HSCT.

Diagnosis and management of acquired aplastic anemia in childhood. Guidelines from the Marrow Failure Study Group of the Pediatric Haemato-Oncology Italian Association (AIEOP)

Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is a rare heterogeneous disorder characterized by pancytopenia and hypoplastic bone marrow. The incidence is 2-3 per million population per year in the Western world, but 3 times higher in East Asia. Survival in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has improved significantly due to advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), immunosuppressive therapy, biologic agents, and supportive care. In SAA, HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) is the first-line treatment. If a MSD is not available, options include immunosuppressive therapy (IST), matched unrelated donor, or haploidentical HSCT. The purpose of this guideline is to provide health care professionals with clear guidance on the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with AA. A preliminary evidence-based document prepared by a group of pediatric hematologists of the Bone Marrow Failure Study Group of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology (AIEOP) was discussed, modified and approved during a series of consensus conferences that started online during COVID 19 and continued in the following years, according to procedures previously validated by the AIEOP Board of Directors.

The state of the art in the treatment of severe aplastic anemia: immunotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation in children and adults

Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is an immune-mediated bone marrow (BM) failure where marrow disruption is driven by a cytotoxic T-cell-mediated autoimmune attack against hematopoietic stem cells. The key diagnostic challenge in children, but also in adults, is to exclude the possible underlying congenital condition and myelodysplasia. The choice of treatment options, either allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) or immunosuppressive therapy (IST), depends on the patient's age, comorbidities, and access to a suitable donor and effective therapeutic agents. Since 2022, horse antithymocyte globulin (hATG) has been available again in Europe and is recommended for IST as a more effective option than rabbit ATG. Therefore, an update on immunosuppressive strategies is warranted. Despite an improved response to the new immunosuppression protocols with hATG and eltrombopag, some patients are not cured or remain at risk of aplasia relapse or clonal evolution and require postponed alloHCT. The transplantation field has evolved, becoming safer and more accessible. Upfront alloHCT from unrelated donors is becoming a tempting option. With the use of posttransplant cyclophosphamide, haploidentical HCT offers promising outcomes also in AA. In this paper, we present the state of the art in the management of severe AA for pediatric and adult patients based on the available guidelines and recently published studies.

Pediatric Bone Marrow Failure: A Broad Landscape in Need of Personalized Management

Irreversible severe bone marrow failure (BMF) is a life-threatening condition in pediatric patients. Most important causes are inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFSs) and (pre)malignant diseases, such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and (idiopathic) aplastic anemia (AA). Timely treatment is essential to prevent infections and bleeding complications and increase overall survival (OS). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) provides a cure for most types of BMF but cannot restore non-hematological defects. When using a matched sibling donor (MSD) or a matched unrelated donor (MUD), the OS after HSCT ranges between 60 and 90%. Due to the introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD), alternative donor HSCT can reach similar survival rates. Although HSCT can restore ineffective hematopoiesis, it is not always used as a first-line therapy due to the severe risks associated with HSCT. Therefore, depending on the underlying cause, other treatment options might be preferred. Finally, for IBMFSs with an identified genetic etiology, gene therapy might provide a novel treatment strategy as it could bypass certain limitations of HSCT. However, gene therapy for most IBMFSs is still in its infancy. This review summarizes current clinical practices for pediatric BMF, including HSCT as well as other disease-specific treatment options.

Comparisons Between modified PTCY and G-CSF/ATG Regimens for Haploidentical Transplantation in Patients with Aplastic Anemia

BACKGROUND

Haploidentical transplantation has become an alternative treatment option for aplastic anemia patients without matched sibling donors or matched unrelated donors. Recently, the post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCY) regimen and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/antithymocyte globulin (ATG) regimen have become the most common protocols used worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

We designed this retrospective study to compare the outcomes of patients receiving a modified post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (mPTCY) regimen versus the G-CSF/ATG regimen.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical data of 130 aplastic anemia patients who underwent haplo-HSCT and received the mPTCY regimen (n=55) or G-CSF/ATG regimen (n=75) between Jan 2013 and Jun 2021 across seven transplant centers.

RESULTS

Neutrophil engraftment was successful in all patients within 30 days in the G-CSF/ATG group. The cumulative neutrophil engraftment rate in the mPTCY group was 96.36% (95% CI, 94.57-97.57, P=0.010). The median time of neutrophil engraftment in the G-CSF/ATG group was 10 (7-28) days, which was more rapid than that observed in the mPTCY group (P <0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of graft versus host disease (GVHD) between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of II-IV acute GVHD was 18.40% (95% CI, 4.27-40.31) in the mPTCY group and 19.32% (95% CI, 5.86-38.58) in the G-CSF/ATG group, while the cumulative incidence of III-IV acute GVHD was 7.31% (95% CI, 0.09-37.48) in the mPTCY group and 7.57% (95% CI, 0.20-34.19) in the G-CSF/ATG group. Similarly, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and GVHD relapse-free survival (GRFS). The 2-year OS, FFS and GRFS rates were 95.91% (95% CI, 84.59-98.96), 92.25% (95% CI, 80.59-97.03) and 86.68% (95% CI, 73.98-93.44), respectively, in the mPTCY group and 86.67% (95% CI, 76.64-92.59), 81.28% (95% CI, 70.45-88.46) and 77.20% (95% CI, 65.89-85.16), respectively, in the G-CSF/ATG group. The transplantation-related mortality (TRM) rate was significantly higher in the G-CSG/ATG group than in the mPTCY group (13.33% in the G-CSG/ATG group versus 1.96% in the mPTCY group, P=0.022). In multivariate analysis, female donors, a higher hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and III-IV aGVHD were associated with worse survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the mPTCY and G-CSF/ATG regimens led to similar outcomes in AA patients, but quicker engraftment was observed with the ATG/G-CSF regimen, and a lower incidence of TRM was observed with the mPTCY regimen.

Combination of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation with Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia: a Retrospective, Controlled Study

Objective:

We retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) combined or not combined with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs).

Materials and Methods:

A total of 101 patients with SAA were enrolled in this study and treated with haplo-HSCT plus UC-MSC infusion (MSC group, n=47) or haplo-HSCT alone (non-MSC group, n=54).

Results:

The median time to neutrophil engraftment in the MSC and non-MSC group was 11 (range: 8-19) and 12 (range: 8-23) days, respectively (p=0.049), with a respective cumulative incidence (CI) of 97.82% and 97.96% (p=0.101). Compared to the non-MSC group, the MSC group had a lower CI of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (8.60±0.25% vs. 24.57±0.48%, p=0.048), but similar rates of grades II-IV acute GVHD (23.40±0.39% vs. 24.49±0.39%, p=0.849), grades III-IV acute GVHD (8.51±0.17% vs. 10.20±0.19%, p=0.765), and moderate-severe chronic GVHD (2.38±0.06% vs. 7.45±0.18%, p=0.352) were observed. The estimated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 78.3±6.1% and 70.1±6.3% (p=0.292) while the estimated 5-year GVHD-free, failure-free survival (GFFS) rates were 76.6±6.2% and 56.7±6.9% (p=0.045) in the MSC and non-MSC groups, respectively.

Conclusion:

In multivariate analysis, graft failure was the only adverse predictor for OS. Meanwhile, graft failure, grades III-IV acute GVHD, and moderate-severe chronic GVHD could predict worse GFFS. Our results indicated that haplo-HSCT combined with UC-MSCs infusion was an effective and safe option for SAA patients.

Haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of severe aplastic anaemia patients with high-risk factors who lack an HLA-matched sibling donor

This study aimed to analyse the efficacy of haploidentical donor (HID) haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a first-line treatment for severe aplastic anaemia (SAA) with high-risk factors (infection or very severe aplastic anaemia,VSAA) in patients who lack an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD). The patients with infection were treated with anti-infection therapy, and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was carried out after the infection being effectively controlled was in accordance with the stable infection (SI) standard. A total of 44 SAA patients receiving MSD transplantation (n=19) and HID transplantation (n=25) were included in this study. There was no significant difference in neutrophil engraftment between the two groups [MSD vs. HID, 19 (11-38) vs. 22 (15-47).P=0.241], and the difference in platelet engraftment was statistically significant [MSD vs. HID, 11(7-33) vs. 20 (12-69), P=0.034]. The HID group exhibited a higher incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (HID vs. MSD, 48.0% vs10.5%, P=0.034)and a higher incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) than the MSD group (64.0% vs. 21.1%, P=0.026). There was no significant difference between overall survival (OS) following HID and MSD transplantation (84.0% vs. 89.5%, P=0.664) and failure-free survival (FFS)(80.0% vs. 84.2%, P=0.965). The interval from diagnosis to transplantation (>50d) and ECOG (>2) were independent factors associated with OS and FFS. HID HSCT may be an effective and safe option for SAA patients with high-risk factors who lack an MSD.

Comparisons Between Frontline Therapy and a Combination of Eltrombopag Plus Immunosuppression Therapy and Human Leukocyte Antigen-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia: A Systematic Review

Background and Aims: This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag (EPAG) plus immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs) and haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in the frontline treatment for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. Methods: Four electronic databases and Clinicaltrials.gov were comprehensively searched from January 2010 to August 2020. Studies that aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of EPAG+IST or haplo-HSCT in SAA patients were included. One-/2-year overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), and overall response rates (ORRs) were indirectly compared between EPAG+IST and haplo-HSCT. Results: A total of 447 patients involved in 10 cohort studies were found to be eligible for this study. A narrative synthesis was performed due to lack of data directly comparing the outcome of EPAG+IST and haplo-HSCT. Consistent with the analysis results in the whole population, subgroup analyses in the age-matched population showed that there was no significant difference in ORR between EPAG+IST and haplo-HSCT groups. However, the CR rate was lower in the EPAG+IST group when compared with the haplo-HSCT group. The incidence rate of clonal evolution/SAA relapse ranged at 8-14 and 19-31% in the EPAG+IST group but not reported in the haplo-HSCT group. The incidence rate for acute graft vs. host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD) ranged at 52-57 and 12-67%, respectively, for the haplo-HSCT group. The main causes of deaths were infections in the EPAG+IST group, and GVHD and infections in the haplo-HSCT group. Conclusion: EPAG+IST has a comparable ORR and 1-/2-year OS but lower CR rate when indirectly compared with haplo-HSCT in the frontline treatment of patients with SAA. Patients treated with haplo-HSCT may exhibit a high incidence of GVHD, whereas patients treated with EPAG+IST may experience more relapses or clone evolution.

Mesenchymal stromal cells as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients with severe aplastic anemia?-a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an emerging prophylaxis option for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), but studies have reported inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of MSCs as prophylaxis for GVHD in SAA patients with haplo-HSCT.

METHODS

Studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and http://clinicaltrials.gov from establishment to February 2020. Twenty-nine single-arm studies (n = 1456) were included, in which eight (n = 241) studies combined with MSCs and eleven (n = 1215) reports without MSCs in haplo-HSCT for SAA patients. The primary outcomes were the incidences of GVHD. Other outcomes included 2-year overall survival (OS) and the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the results pooled through random or fixed effects models.

RESULTS

Between MSCs and no MSCs groups, no significant differences were found in the pooled incidences of acute GVHD (56.0%, 95% CI 48.6-63.5% vs. 47.2%, 95% CI 29.0-65.4%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91-2.25; p = 0.123), grade II-IV acute GVHD (29.8%, 95% CI 24.1-35.5% vs. 30.6%, 95% CI 26.6-34.6%; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70-1.32; p = 0.889), and chronic GVHD (25.4%, 95% CI 19.8-31.0% vs. 30.0%, 95% CI 23.3-36.6%; OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56-1.11; p = 0.187). Furtherly, there was no obvious difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60-1.61; p = 1.000) and incidence of CMV infection (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-1.92; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis indicates that the prophylactic use of MSC co-transplantation is not an effective option for SAA patients undergoing haplo-HSCT. Hence, the general co-transplantation of MSCs for SAA haplo-HSCT recipients may lack evidence-based practice.

Comparison of efficacy and health-related quality of life of first-line haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with unrelated cord blood infusion and first-line immunosuppressive therapy for acquired severe aplastic anemia

We retrospectively compared the efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of (1) first-line haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT, n = 146) combined with unrelated cord blood (UCB) infusion and (2) first-line immunosuppressive therapy (IST, n = 219) in acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. At 6 months post treatment, 90.30% patients in the haplo-HSCT group and 18.78% patients in the IST group achieved normal blood routine (P < 0.0001). The time required to discontinue red blood cells and platelets transfusion in the IST group were longer than in the haplo-HSCT group (P < 0.0001). The estimated overall survival at 4 years was similar (80.1 ± 3.5% vs. 80.1 ± 3.0%, P = 0.726); the estimated failure-free survival (FFS) at 4 years was 77.8 ± 3.7% in the haplo-HSCT group and 48.0 ± 3.6% in the IST group (P < 0.0001). Patients treated with haplo-HSCT scored significantly better in the HRQoL than treated with IST (P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, first-line haplo-HSCT was the favorable factor for FFS and HRQoL (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that first-line haplo-HSCT combined with UCB infusion might provide a better chance of success and HRQoL than first-line IST for SAA patients.

Combination of haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with an unrelated cord-blood unit in patients with severe aplastic anemia: a report of 146 cases

We analyzed the outcomes of 146 severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients who received a combination of haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) and an unrelated cord-blood (UCB) unit between September 2011 and December 2017. One hundred and seventeen patients underwent transplantation as first-line therapy. Seven patients experienced early mortality, and among the evaluable 139 patients, one patient experienced primary graft failure (GF), while the other 138 patients achieved successful haploidentical donor engraftment; additionally, three patients experienced secondary GF. Six patients demonstrated delayed platelet recovery, and three patients demonstrated platelet GF. The median time for myeloid and platelet engraftment was 11 (range: 9-28) days and 15 (range: 9-330) days, respectively. With a median follow-up of 40 (range: 18-93) months, the cumulative incidences were 31.43% and 10.00% for grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), respectively. The cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and moderate-severe cGVHD were 36.23% and 11.71%, respectively. There was no patient relapse. The probabilities of 4-year overall survival and GVHD-free, failure-free survival were 81.4 ± 3.3% and 69.2 ± 3.9%, respectively. These encouraging preliminary results indicated that haplo-HSCT combined with the infusion of UCB is a feasible choice for SAA patients without matched donors.

Comparison of frontline treatment with intensive immunosuppression therapy and HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for young patients with severe aplastic anemia - A meta analysis

AIM

To compare the survivals and treatment related complications between immunosuppression therapy (IST) and haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) on children and young adults with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) in East Asia during the last 10 years.

METHODS

After looking through Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Wanfang Data, a total of 491 patients from 7 retrospective studies conducted in East-Asia were included for meta-analysis based on Stata program. Publication bias was measured by Begger and Egger tests. 1/3/5/10 years overall survivals (OS), failure free survivals (FFS), incidence rates of adverse events and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled and compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference of 1/3/5/10 years OS between IST group and haplo-HSCT group, but the 1/3/5/10 years FFS were significantly better in haplo-HSCT group compared with IST group (p < 0.01). However, higher incidence of infections was observed in haplo-HSCT group compared with IST group (76% versus 45%, p < 0.001). The pooled estimates for acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) were 54% (95% Cl, 43%～64%) and 43% (95% CI, 18%～68%), respectively for haplo-HSCT group. Among them 38% (95%CI, 22%～54%) was grade III aGVHD and 11% (95% Cl, 0%～22%) was grade III-IV aGVHD. Death causes included severe infection, bleeding in IST group and infection, GVHD in haplo-HSCT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term survivals were similar for young patients with SAA who received IST or haplo-HSCT as the frontline treatment. The haplo-HSCT group showed a better FFS, on the other hand, had higher incidence of infection and GVHD.

Comparison of Outcomes of Frontline Immunosuppressive Therapy and Frontline Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children with Severe Aplastic Anemia Who Lack an HLA-Matched Sibling Donor

We compared the outcomes of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with those of T cell-replete haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) in children and adolescents with severe aplastic anemia (SAA). The medical records of 49 patients with SAA who received frontline IST (n = 29) or frontline haplo-HSCT (n = 20) between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Fourteen patients responded after the first IST, and 1 patient responded after the second IST in the frontline IST group; 12 patients underwent salvage HSCT after IST failure. Sixteen of the 20 patients who underwent frontline haplo-HSCT survived without treatment failure. The 3-year overall survival of the frontline IST group was comparable to that of the frontline haplo-HSCT group (79.3 ± 7.5% versus 85.0 ± 8.0%; χ² = 0.110; P = .740). The 3-year failure-free survival was lower in the frontline IST group compared with the frontline haplo-HSCT group (35.9 ± 10.9% versus 80.0 ± 8.9%; χ² = 4.089; P = .043). Five patients of the IST group who underwent salvage HSCT achieved long survival without event. The event-free survival was lower in the salvage HSCT group compared with the haplo-HSCT group (41.7 ± 14.2% versus 80.0 ± 8.9%; χ² = 3.992; P = .046), and the incidences of acute GVHD, grade II-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and severe infection were comparable between the 2 groups. Our results suggest that frontline haplo-HSCT may be a better treatment than IST for children and adolescents with SAA who lack an HLA age-matched familial donor.

Comparable Outcome with a Faster Engraftment of Optimized Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Compared with Transplantations from Other Donor Types in Pediatric Acquired Aplastic Anemia

Haploidentical family donors have been used as an alternative source in hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with severe aplastic anemia. We evaluated and compared the outcomes of transplantation in pediatric acquired severe aplastic anemia based on donor type. Sixty-seven patients who underwent transplantation between 1998 and 2017 were included. Fourteen patients received grafts from matched sibling donors, 21 from suitable unrelated donors, and 32 from haploidentical family donors. Ex vivo CD3⁺ or αβ⁺ T cell-depleted grafts were used for haploidentical transplantation. Sixty-five patients (97.0%) achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 11 days. Haploidentical transplantation resulted in significantly faster neutrophil engraftment at a median of 10 days, compared with 14 days in cases of matched sibling donors and 12 days in cases of unrelated donor recipients. Nine patients experienced graft failure, and 5 of 7 who underwent a second transplantation are alive. There was no difference in the incidence of acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease based on donor type. The 5-year overall survival and failure-free survival rates were 93.8% ± 3.0% and 83.3% ± 4.6%, respectively, and there was no significant survival difference based on donor type. The survival outcomes of haploidentical transplantation in patients were comparable with those of matched sibling or unrelated donor transplantation. Optimized haploidentical transplantation using selective T cell depletion and conditioning regimens including low-dose total body irradiation for enhancing engraftment may be a realistic therapeutic option for pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia.

Haploidentical Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (bone marrow transplantation [BMT]) is the only curative treatment of severe aplastic anemia. BMT from an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor is the standard of care for young patients; immunosuppressive therapy is used for older patients or those lacking matched sibling donors. Patients with refractory or relapsed disease are increasingly treated with HLA haploidentical BMT. Historically, haploidentical BMT led to high rates of graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease. High-dose post transplant cyclophosphamide, which mitigates the risk of graft-versus-host disease, is a major advance. This article provides an overview of the haploidentical BMT approach in severe aplastic anemia.

Updated Guidelines for the Treatment of Acquired Aplastic Anemia in Children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aimed to provide updated guidelines for the management of children with acquired aplastic anemia (AA), particularly focusing on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

RECENT FINDINGS

Failure-free survival for children with aplastic anemia has been shown to be better after bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from matched or one-locus mismatched related donors (MRD/1MMRD) than after immunosuppressive therapy (IST). A combination of the absence of minor paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clones and short telomere length was identified as a strong predictor of a poor response to IST. Upfront HSCT from matched unrelated donors (MUD) and MRD was recently demonstrated to have comparable outcomes. Moreover, unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and haploidentical HSCT have shown promising outcomes, and the fludarabine/melphalan-based regimen has resulted in excellent survival without poor graft function. BMT from MRD/1MMRD is the treatment of choice. When a MRD/1MMRD is not available, upfront BMT from a MUD should be considered for patients with only a slim chance of responding to IST. UCBT and haploidentical HSCT are promising options. This updated treatment algorithm should improve overall outcomes for children with AA.

Cotransplantation of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cells and allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells as a first-line treatment in very severe aplastic anemia patients with refractory infections

OBJECTIVES

In patients with very severe aplastic anemia (VSAA), neutropenia is prolonged and persistent, resulting in refractory overwhelming infections. Hematopoiesis recovery is urgently needed.

METHODS

Six patients with de novo VSAA lacking HLA-identical sibling donors and those who experienced refractory infections underwent haploidentical related donor (HRD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as a first-line therapy. The conditioning regimen consisted of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Culture-expanded allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells were infused on day 0 and day +14.

RESULTS

From diagnosis to HSCT, 6 patients experienced a total of 28 episodes of persistent fever, and the median number was 4 (range, 3-7). All cases developed major bacterial infections and invasive pulmonary fungal infection pre-HSCT. The median time from diagnosis to HSCT was 2 months (range, 1-3.5 months). All patients achieved sustained, full donor chimerism, and the median time of myeloid recovery and platelet engraftment was 13 days (range, 9-19 days) and 15.5 days (range, 10-23 days), respectively. One patient died of aGVHD, and 5 patients are alive after a median follow-up of 21 months (range 17-40.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront HRD-HSCT may be a safe and promising choice for patients with VSAA in critical situations without suitably matched donors.

[Comparison of different styles of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as first-line treatment treated with severe aplastic anemia in children and adolescents]

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from different donors as first-line treatment for children and adolescents with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) . Methods: The clinical data of 79 children and adolescents with SAA diagnosed from January 2013 to December 2016 in Henan Province were retrospectively analyzed. There were 50 males and 29 females, with a median age of 14(4-18) years. 40 cases received matched sibling transplantation (MSD-HSCT), 17 with unrelated donor transplantation (UD-HSCT), and 22 with haploidentical transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Results: The comparison of MSD-HSCT, UD-HSCT, haplo-HSCT groups was conducted and the median times of neutrophils engraftment were statistically significant [12(9-25) d, 14(10-22) d, 16(11-26) d, respectively (χ2=13.302, P=0.001)], but no difference in+30 d engraftment rate [97.3%(36/37), 100%(15/15), 100%(20/20), χ2=0.959, P=0.619]. The median times of PLT engraftment were not statistically significant [14(6-34)d, 16(7-32)d, 19(10-34)d, respectively, χ2=5.892, P=0.053], and the +30 d engraftment rate had no difference [97.3%(36/37), 100%(15/15), 100%(20/20), χ2=0.959, P=0.619]. The post-transplant infection rate showed no statistically significance [35.0% (14/40), 29.4% (5/17), 45.5% (10/22), χ2=1.158, P=0.560], as well as the incidences of aGVHD, grade III/IV aGVHD and cGVHD(χ2=0.230, P=0.891; χ2=2.628, P=0.269; χ2=3.187, P=0.203). The two-years OS rate was not statistically significant respectively [(77.1±6.7)%, (70.6±11.1)%, (77.3±8.9)%, χ2=0.330, P=0.845]. Severe post-transplant infection (RR=4.617, P=0.009), grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD (RR=2.707, P=0.048) were independent risk factors for OS. Conclusion: The overall efficacy of MSD-HSCT, UD-HSCT and haplo-HSCT as first-line therapy for children and adolescents with SAA/VSAA is comparable.

Optimal donor for severe aplastic anemia patient requiring allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A large-sample study from China

HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may be an option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. However, to date, no large-sample studies have been performed to determine which types of SAA patients are suitable for HLA-haploidentical HSCT. We retrospectively studied 189 consecutive patients with SAA who underwent HLA-identical or HLA-haploidentical HSCT at seven transplant centers in China. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied in this study to reduce the influence of potential confounders. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 72.0% in the HLA-haploidentical group and 76.5% in the HLA-identical group. The median time to achieve engraftment and the incidence of acute GVHD/chronic GVHD were not significantly different between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, the outcome of patients older than 40 years in the HLA-haploidentical group was significantly poorer than that of patients younger than 40 years in the same group and that of patients older than 40 years in the HLA-identical group. Based on the above results, we suggest that HLA-haploidentical relative HSCT should be considered as a valid alternative option for patients younger than 40 years with SAA for whom no matched sibling donor is available.

Alternative Donor Transplantation with High-Dose Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Refractory Severe Aplastic Anemia

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a life-threatening hematopoietic stem cell disorder that is treated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or immunosuppressive therapy (IST). The management of patients with refractory SAA after IST is a major challenge. Alternative donor BMT is the best chance for cure in refractory SAA, but morbidity and mortality from graft failure and complications of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have limited enthusiasm for this approach. Here, we employed post-transplantation high-dose cyclophosphamide in an effort to safely expand the donor pool in 16 consecutive patients with refractory SAA who did not have a matched sibling donor. Between July 2011 and August 2016, 16 patients underwent allogeneic (allo) BMT for refractory SAA from 13 haploidentical donors and 3 unrelated donors. The nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen consisted of antithymocyte globulin, fludarabine, low-dose cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day i.v. on days +3 and +4 was administered for GVHD prophylaxis. Additionally, patients received mycophenolate mofetil on days +5 through 35 and tacrolimus from day +5 through 1 year. The median age of the patients at the time of transplantation was 30 (range, 11 to 69) years. The median time to neutrophil recovery over 1000 × 103/mm3 for 3 consecutive days was 19 (range, 16 to 27) days, to red cell engraftment was 25 (range, 2 to 58) days, and to last platelet transfusion to keep platelets counts over 50 × 103/mm3 was 27.5 (range, 22 to 108) days. Graft failure, primary or secondary, was not seen in any of the patients. All 16 patients are alive, transfusion independent, and without evidence of clonality. The median follow-up is 21 (range, 3 to 64) months. Two patients had grade 1 or 2 skin-only acute GVHD. These same 2 also had mild chronic GVHD of the skin/mouth requiring systemic steroids. One of these GVHD patients was able to come off all IST by 15 months and the other by 17 months. All other patients stopped IST at 1 year. Nonmyeloablative alloBMT using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide allowed for safe expansion of the donor pool to include HLA-haploidentical donors. This approach appears promising in refractory SAA patients. Importantly, engraftment was 100%, pre-existing clonal disease was eradicated, and the risk of GVHD was low.

Haploidentical transplantation for pediatric patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia

Techniques for haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) to treat severe aplastic anemia (SAA) have recently improved, but no protocol has been evaluated in a large number of pediatric patients. Fifty-two children with SAA received haplo-HSCT in our center. The treatment protocol used G-CSF-primed bone marrow with G-CSF-mobilized PBSCs without in vitro T-cell depletion. The conditioning regimen included busulfan/cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin. Fifty-one patients achieved primary engraftment; one child died of regimen-related toxicity on the day +1. Secondary graft failure occurred in three patients. The cumulative incidences of aGVHD grade II-IV and grade III-IV were 39.2±0.5 and 13.7±0.2%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 34.2±0.5%. The 3-year overall and failure-free survival rates were 84.5±5.0 and 82.7±5.2%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 744.5 days (100-3294) for surviving patients. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score was the only predictor of overall and failure-free survival rates. Clinical outcomes were similar between the upfront and salvage group. This result suggests that both newly diagnosed and refractory pediatric SAA patients benefit from haplo-HSCT, especially when patients are in good general condition. Therefore, haplo-HSCT might be an alternative therapy for pediatric SAA patients without HLA-matched sibling donors.