1
|
Trentadue G, Kats-Ugurlu G, Blokzijl T, Haveman JW, Faber KN, Dijkstra G. Chronic Allograft Enteropathy Treated with Vedolizumab: A Case Report. Transplant Proc 2025; 57:148-155. [PMID: 39638713 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most common cause of late graft loss in intestinal transplantation is chronic allograft enteropathy (CAE). The diagnosis is often delayed because of late symptoms and signs, and the only available treatment is graft enterectomy. We present the first case of CAE successfully treated with a gut-specific integrin blocker. CASE REPORT We present a patient who developed CAE 15 years after transplantation and was treated with vedolizumab, a gut-specific integrin blocker that is used for inflammatory bowel disease, thereby avoiding complete graft resection. We show the clinical, endoscopic, radiological, serological, and histopathological course of CAE beginning with discovery of the first signs of disease until 15 months after the start of vedolizumab treatment. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this case represents the first use of vedolizumab in such a circumstance and provides evidence of its usefulness as a rescue therapy for chronic intestinal rejection to, at least, extend graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Trentadue
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Gursah Kats-Ugurlu
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Tjasso Blokzijl
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Klaas Nico Faber
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gerard Dijkstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suek N, Young T, Fu J. Immune cell profiling in intestinal transplantation. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110808. [PMID: 38762429 PMCID: PMC11283363 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
Since the first published case study of human intestinal transplantation in 1967, there have been significant studies of intestinal transplant immunology in both animal models and humans. An improved understanding of the profiles of different immune cell subsets is critical for understanding their contributions to graft outcomes. While different studies have focused on the contribution of one or a few subsets to intestinal transplant, no study has integrated these data for a comprehensive overview of immune dynamics after intestinal transplant. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on different immune subsets and discuss their roles in intestinal transplant outcomes on multiple levels, focusing on chimerism and graft immune reconstitution, clonal alloreactivity, and cell phenotype. In Sections 1, 2 and 3, we lay out a shared framework for understanding intestinal transplant, focusing on the mechanisms of rejection or tolerance in the context of mucosal immunology and illustrate the unique role of the bidirectional graft-versus-host (GvH) and host-versus-graft (HvG) alloresponse. In Sections 4, 5 and 6, we further expand upon these concepts as we discuss the contribution of different cell subsets to intestinal transplant. An improved understanding of intestinal transplantation immunology will bring us closer to maximizing the potential of this important treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Suek
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Tyla Young
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Jianing Fu
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fu J, Hsiao T, Waffarn E, Meng W, Long KD, Frangaj K, Jones R, Gorur A, Shtewe A, Li M, Muntnich CB, Rogers K, Jiao W, Velasco M, Matsumoto R, Kubota M, Wells S, Danzl N, Ravella S, Iuga A, Vasilescu ER, Griesemer A, Weiner J, Farber DL, Luning Prak ET, Martinez M, Kato T, Hershberg U, Sykes M. Dynamic establishment and maintenance of the human intestinal B cell population and repertoire following transplantation in a pediatric-dominated cohort. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1375486. [PMID: 39007142 PMCID: PMC11239347 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1375486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction It is unknown how intestinal B cell populations and B cell receptor (BCR) repertoires are established and maintained over time in humans. Following intestinal transplantation (ITx), surveillance ileal mucosal biopsies provide a unique opportunity to map the dynamic establishment of recipient gut lymphocyte populations in immunosuppressed conditions. Methods Using polychromatic flow cytometry that includes HLA allele group-specific antibodies distinguishing donor from recipient cells along with high throughput BCR sequencing, we tracked the establishment of recipient B cell populations and BCR repertoire in the allograft mucosa of ITx recipients. Results We confirm the early presence of naïve donor B cells in the circulation (donor age range: 1-14 years, median: 3 years) and, for the first time, document the establishment of recipient B cell populations, including B resident memory cells, in the intestinal allograft mucosa (recipient age range at the time of transplant: 1-44 years, median: 3 years). Recipient B cell repopulation of the allograft was most rapid in infant (<1 year old)-derived allografts and, unlike T cell repopulation, did not correlate with rejection rates. While recipient memory B cell populations were increased in graft mucosa compared to circulation, naïve recipient B cells remained detectable in the graft mucosa for years. Comparisons of peripheral and intra-mucosal B cell repertoires in the absence of rejection (recipient age range at the time of transplant: 1-9 years, median: 2 years) revealed increased BCR mutation rates and clonal expansion in graft mucosa compared to circulating B cells, but these parameters did not increase markedly after the first year post-transplant. Furthermore, clonal mixing between the allograft mucosa and the circulation was significantly greater in ITx recipients, even years after transplantation, than in deceased adult donors. In available pan-scope biopsies from pediatric recipients, we observed higher percentages of naïve recipient B cells in colon allograft compared to small bowel allograft and increased BCR overlap between native colon vs colon allograft compared to that between native colon vs ileum allograft in most cases, suggesting differential clonal distribution in large intestine vs small intestine. Discussion Collectively, our data demonstrate intestinal mucosal B cell repertoire establishment from a circulating pool, a process that continues for years without evidence of stabilization of the mucosal B cell repertoire in pediatric ITx patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianing Fu
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Thomas Hsiao
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Elizabeth Waffarn
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wenzhao Meng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Katherine D. Long
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kristjana Frangaj
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alaka Gorur
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Areen Shtewe
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Muyang Li
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Constanza Bay Muntnich
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kortney Rogers
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Wenyu Jiao
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Monica Velasco
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Rei Matsumoto
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Masaru Kubota
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Steven Wells
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nichole Danzl
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Shilpa Ravella
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Alina Iuga
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Adam Griesemer
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joshua Weiner
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Donna L. Farber
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Eline T. Luning Prak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Mercedes Martinez
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Tomoaki Kato
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Uri Hershberg
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Megan Sykes
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu Q, Zeevi A, Ganoza A, Cruz RJ, Mazariegos GV. Current approaches for risk assessment of intestinal transplant patients: A view from the histocompatibility laboratory. Hum Immunol 2024; 85:110768. [PMID: 38433035 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2024.110768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Despite its recent decline in volumes, intestinal transplantation remains an important option for patients with irreversible intestinal failures. The long-term outcome of an intestinal transplant has stagnated. The major cause of graft loss is rejection, resulting from mismatches in human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and the presence of antibodies to mismatched donor-specific HLA antigens (DSA). Literature has reported that DSAs, either preformed before transplantation or developed de novo after transplantation, are harmful to intestinal grafts, especially for those without combined liver grafts. A comprehensive assessment of DSA by the histocompatibility laboratory is critical for successful intestinal transplantation and its long-term survival. This paper briefly reviews the history and current status of different methods for detecting DSA and their clinical applications in intestinal transplantation. The focus is on applying different antibody assays to manage immunologically challenging intestinal transplant patients before and after transplantation. A clinical case is presented to illustrate the complexity of HLA tests and the necessity of multiple assays. The review of risk assessment by the histocompatibility laboratory also highlights the need for close interaction between the laboratory and the intestinal transplant program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyong Xu
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, USA
| | | | - Ruy J Cruz
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Gastrointestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Center, Starzl Transplantation Institute, USA
| | - George V Mazariegos
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Hillman Center for Pediatric Transplantation, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klein K, Keck M, Langewisch E, Merani S, Hitchman K, Leick M. Evaluation of serial monitoring of donor-specific antibodies in pediatric and adult intestinal/multivisceral transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14638. [PMID: 37942670 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study purpose was to add to limited literature assessing anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) appearance, clearance, specificity, and impact in intestinal/multivisceral (MV) transplant as well as the value of serial monitoring following an institutional protocol shift implementing serial monitoring. METHODS This single-center retrospective review included intestinal/MV recipients transplanted 1/1/15-9/31/17 with completed DSA testing. Patients were divided into groups based on DSA presence post-transplant. The primary outcome was biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Secondary outcomes included graft loss and death. Descriptive analysis of DSA was completed. RESULTS Of the 35 intestinal/MV recipients (60% pediatric) with DSA testing, 24 patients had post-transplant DSA. Fifteen patients in the DSA(+) group had T-cell-mediated BPAR versus five in the DSA(-) group (63% vs 45%, p = .47). Days to BPAR were 25 [IQR 19-165] (DSA(+) group) versus 232 [IQR 25.5-632.5] (DSA(-) group) (p = .066). There were no differences between groups for graft loss or death. One hundred and five DSA were identified in the DSA(+) group with 63% being class II, and 54% cleared during follow-up. DSA were directed against 50 different HLA alleles, with the most common being directed against HLA- DQ (35%). Time to first DSA and to clearance did not differ between class I and II. CONCLUSION Findings confirm previous data that suggest post-transplant DSA in this population may lead to increased BPAR or shorter time to BPAR, although not statistically significant. Most DSA were identified within the first month after transplant, and ahead of rejection identification on biopsy. DSA therefore may have utility as an early rejection biomarker and use may be considered in place of early protocol biopsies, particularly in pediatric patients. We identified novel findings of DSA directed against a large breadth of HLA in intestinal/MV patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey Klein
- University Health Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Pharmacotherapy Division, Austin TX, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Megan Keck
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Eric Langewisch
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Shaheed Merani
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Kelley Hitchman
- University Health Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Mary Leick
- Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fu J, Hsiao T, Waffarn E, Meng W, Long KD, Frangaj K, Jones R, Gorur A, Shtewe A, Li M, Muntnich CB, Rogers K, Jiao W, Velasco M, Matsumoto R, Kubota M, Wells S, Danzl N, Ravella S, Iuga A, Vasilescu ER, Griesemer A, Weiner J, Farber DL, Luning Prak ET, Martinez M, Kato T, Hershberg U, Sykes M. Dynamic establishment and maintenance of the human intestinal B cell population and repertoire following transplantation. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.15.23298517. [PMID: 38014202 PMCID: PMC10680888 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.15.23298517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
It is unknown how intestinal B cell populations and B cell receptor (BCR) repertoires are established and maintained over time in humans. Following intestinal transplantation (ITx), surveillance ileal mucosal biopsies provide a unique opportunity to map the dynamic establishment of gut lymphocyte populations. Using polychromatic flow cytometry that includes HLA allele group-specific mAbs distinguishing donor from recipient cells along with high throughput BCR sequencing, we tracked the establishment of recipient B cell populations and BCR repertoire in the allograft mucosa of ITx recipients. We confirm the early presence of naïve donor B cells in the circulation and, for the first time, document the establishment of recipient B cell populations, including B resident memory cells, in the intestinal allograft mucosa. Recipient B cell repopulation of the allograft was most rapid in infant (<1 year old)-derived allografts and, unlike T cell repopulation, did not correlate with rejection rates. While recipient memory B cell populations were increased in graft mucosa compared to circulation, naïve recipient B cells remained detectable in the graft mucosa for years. Comparisons of peripheral and intra-mucosal B cell repertoires in the absence of rejection revealed increased BCR mutation rates and clonal expansion in graft mucosa compared to circulating B cells, but these parameters did not increase markedly after the first year post-transplant. Furthermore, clonal mixing between the allograft mucosa and the circulation was significantly greater in ITx recipients, even years after transplantation, than in healthy control adults. Collectively, our data demonstrate intestinal mucosal B cell repertoire establishment from a circulating pool, a process that continues for years without evidence of establishment of a stable mucosal B cell repertoire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianing Fu
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thomas Hsiao
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Elizabeth Waffarn
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wenzhao Meng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine D Long
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kristjana Frangaj
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Jones
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alaka Gorur
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Areen Shtewe
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Muyang Li
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constanza Bay Muntnich
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kortney Rogers
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wenyu Jiao
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Monica Velasco
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rei Matsumoto
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Masaru Kubota
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven Wells
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nichole Danzl
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shilpa Ravella
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alina Iuga
- Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Adam Griesemer
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Weiner
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna L Farber
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eline T Luning Prak
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Tomoaki Kato
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Uri Hershberg
- Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Megan Sykes
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Battle R, Pritchard D, Peacock S, Hastie C, Worthington J, Jordan S, McCaughlan JA, Barnardo M, Cope R, Collins C, Diaz-Burlinson N, Rosser C, Foster L, Kallon D, Shaw O, Briggs D, Turner D, Anand A, Akbarzad-Yousefi A, Sage D. BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation. Int J Immunogenet 2023; 50 Suppl 2:3-63. [PMID: 37919251 DOI: 10.1111/iji.12641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Battle
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sarah Peacock
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sue Jordan
- National Blood Service Tooting, London, UK
| | | | - Martin Barnardo
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Rebecca Cope
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | - Luke Foster
- Birmingham Blood Donor Centre, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Olivia Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - David Turner
- Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Arthi Anand
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hussan E, Kroemer A, Elsabbagh AM, Khan KM, Yazigi NA, Ekong UD, Subramanian S, Ghobrial SS, Guerra JF, Fishbein TM, Matsumoto CS, Kaufman SS. Idiopathic Ileal Ulceration After Intestinal Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1529. [PMID: 37899780 PMCID: PMC10602531 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Idiopathic ileal ulceration after intestinal transplantation (ITx) has been discussed infrequently and has an uncertain natural history and relation to graft rejection. Herein, we review our experience with this pathology. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 225 ITx in 217 patients with minimum 1 y graft survival. Routine graft endoscopy was conducted up to twice weekly within the first 90 d after ITx, gradually decreasing to once yearly. Risks for ulceration over time were evaluated using Cox regression. Results Of 93 (41%) patients with ulcers, 50 were found within 90 d after ITx mostly via ileoscopy; delayed healing after biopsy appeared causal in the majority. Of the remaining 43 patients with ulcers found >90 d after ITx, 36 were after ileostomy closure. Multivariable modeling demonstrated within 90-d ulcer associations with increasing patient age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.027; P < 0.001) and loop ileostomy (versus Santulli ileostomy; HR, 0.271; P < 0.001). For ulcers appearing after ileostomy closure, their sole association was with absence of graft colon (HR, 7.232; P < 0.001). For ulcers requiring extended anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory therapy, associations included de novo donor-specific antibodies (HR, 3.222; P < 0.007) and nucleotide oligomerization domain mutations (HR, 2.772; P < 0.016). Whole-cohort post-ITx ulceration was not associated with either graft rejection (P = 0.161) or graft failure (P = 0.410). Conclusions Idiopathic ulceration after ITx is relatively common but has little independent influence on outcome; risks include ileostomy construction, colon-free ITx, immunologic mutation, and donor sensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elsadig Hussan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Alexander Kroemer
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Ahmed M. Elsabbagh
- Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Department of Surgery, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Khalid M. Khan
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Nada A. Yazigi
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Udeme D. Ekong
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Sukanya Subramanian
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | | | - Juan-Francisco Guerra
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Thomas M. Fishbein
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Cal S. Matsumoto
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Stuart S. Kaufman
- MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu G, Liu C, Ma N, Zhou X, Zhao L, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liang T. Successful combined auxiliary partial liver and intestinal transplantation in two highly sensitized, cross-match positive patients. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14865. [PMID: 36416299 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) creates an immunological barrier to intestinal transplantation (ITx). Current desensitization therapies are limited and ineffective in the most highly sensitized patients. A co-transplanted whole liver transplant can protect a kidney, heart, or intestinal allograft from antibody-mediated injury. Whether an auxiliary partial liver allograft provides effective protection for highly sensitized intestinal transplant recipients is unknown. METHODS Two patients with strong HLA donor-specific antibody at high titer against their deceased donors underwent combined auxiliary partial liver and ITx across a positive cross-match. The left lateral lobes from the combined-graft recipients and the right liver lobes from the deceased donors were transplanted as a domino procedure to other four patients. RESULTS Two combined-graft recipients have had an uneventful postoperative course without major complications at a 12- and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Intestinal graft function has been excellent with no evidence of humoral or cellular rejection. While a positive cross-match turned negative, titers of donor-specific HLA antibodies gradually declined over time after transplant. The left liver lobes procured from the combined-graft recipients were successfully transplanted into two pediatric patients (age 1.9, 2.4 years) and the right lobes from two deceased donors were successfully transplanted into two adult patients. All transplant procedures went well, without post-operative complications related to the splitting technique. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that an auxiliary liver transplant can effectively protect a co-transplanted intestinal allograft against rejection and suggest that this combined procedure may serve as a useful therapeutic adjunct for a highly sensitized intestinal transplant candidate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guosheng Wu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chaoxu Liu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Nan Ma
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xile Zhou
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Long Zhao
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuntao Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wentong Zhang
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang University Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu G, Wu Y, Wang M, Zhang W, Liu C, Liang T. Vascular reconstruction of segmental intestinal grafts using autologous internal iliac vessels. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2021; 9:350-356. [PMID: 34567567 PMCID: PMC8460098 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goab016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to assess whether the autologous internal iliac artery and vein could be used as an interpositional graft for vascular reconstruction in segmental intestinal allografts and autografts. Methods Thirty-four intestinal transplants (19 living-related allografts and 15 autografts) were conducted in our programs between January 2011 and January 2019. Patient characteristics, type of vascular reconstruction, and post-operative complications were reviewed. Results There were 20 males and 14 females with a median age of 35 years. Of 34 grafts, 22 (64.7%) (11 allografts and 11 autografts) were revascularized using the autologous internal iliac artery and vein for reconstruction. Vascular reconstruction on the back table took 21 ± 6 min to complete. Both total operative time and cold ischemia time tended to be longer in the vascular-reconstruction group than in the direct-anastomosis group (530 ± 226 vs 440 ± 116 and 159 ± 49 vs 125 ± 66 min, respectively), but these differences were not significant. The incidence of vascular thrombosis tended to be higher in the direct-anastomosis group than in the vascular-reconstruction group (16.7% vs 0%, P = 0.118). At a median follow-up of 36.9 months, no stenosis or pseudoaneurysms developed. In 19 allografts, acute rejection occurred in 4 (21.1%) and chronic rejection occurred in 1 (5.2%). Conclusions Our results indicate that the use of an autologous internal iliac interposition graft greatly facilitates intestinal graft implantation and minimizes the risk of vascular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guosheng Wu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Yinglun Wu
- Section of Plastic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Mian Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Wentong Zhang
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Chaoxu Liu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P.R. China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Intestinal Transplant Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Donor-specific antibody and sensitized patients in intestinal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:245-249. [PMID: 33528224 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW It has been well established that antibody to donor HLA pretransplant and the development of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies posttransplant contribute to inferior graft survival outcomes. This article serves to review the current status of the management of pretransplant sensitized intestinal transplant candidate as well as to review posttransplant care of patients that harbor antidonor HLA antibodies. RECENT FINDINGS The intestinal transplant candidate oftentimes presents for transplant listing with high levels of anti-HLA antibodies that necessitate a careful preoperative strategy to avoid a donor-recipient pair that would result in a positive crossmatch. In the end, donor intestine offer acceptance is based on a balance between recipient clinical needs and allowable immunologic risk tolerance. The use of virtual crossmatching (VXM) enables the transplant center to effectively gauge the immunologic risk of each potential donor-recipient pair far in advance of allocating resources toward pursuing a donor organ. In those candidates with high levels of preformed donor anti-HLA antibodies, desensitization with a novel technique of donor splenic perfusion has been described as well as a single-center experience with a conventional desensitizing protocol. Posttransplant, with the use of a denovo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) monitoring and treatment protocol, the well known deleterious effects of dnDSA can potentially be ameliorated, thus improving outcome. Efforts to establish a formal histologic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in the intestinal graft continues to evolve with recent findings describing the relationship between DSA and histopathologic findings. SUMMARY Techniques such as the use of VXM, novel desensitization methods and protocols, monitoring and eradicating dnDSA, along with establishing new criteria for ABMR have all contributed to improving the outcomes in transplanting the immunologically challenging intestine.
Collapse
|
12
|
Varkey J. Graft assessment for acute rejection after intestinal transplantation: current status and future perspective. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:13-19. [PMID: 33202155 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1847318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation has since its inception evolved as a lifesaving treatment option for patients with irreversible intestinal failure who can no longer be sustained on parenteral nutrition. Improvement in short-term survival after transplantation has also justified the expansion of treatment indications. Unfortunately, success is somewhat limited by a plateau observed in long-term survival. The reason for this sub-optimal long-term result experienced in this cohort may in part be attributed to the intestinal graft with the lymphoid content it carries inflicting the host with multiple complications where acute cellular rejection is one of the most common causes for graft loss. Graft monitoring is for this reason of paramount importance and detection of rejection at an early stage essential to enable early instigation of treatment and successful reversal of the pathology. Due to the challenges in diagnosing acute rejection with a noninvasive marker we are still limited to a surveillance protocol using endoscopy and biopsies for the diagnosis of rejection. The purpose of our paper is to review the adequacy of different methods in monitoring the graft for acute rejection using biomarkers, endoscopy and imaging. In conclusion, the evidence base continues to support the use of histology for the diagnosis of acute rejection. The role of biomarkers are still debatable, although markers such as calprotectin might be beneficial in excluding an ongoing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Varkey
- Department of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska Intestinal Failure and Transplant Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Beyzaei Z, Geramizadeh B, Bagheri Z, Karimzadeh S, Shojazadeh A. De Novo Donor Specific Antibody and Long-Term Outcome After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol 2020; 11:613128. [PMID: 33424868 PMCID: PMC7786049 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.613128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of de novo anti-HLA donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) which develop after long-term liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial and unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of de novo DSAs on the outcome in LT. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published until Dec 31, 2019, that reported de novo DSA outcome data (≥1 year of follow-up) after liver transplant. A literature search in the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases was performed. RESULTS Of 5,325 studies identified, 15 fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The studies which reported 2016 liver transplant recipients with de novo DSAs showed an increased complication risk, i.e. graft loss and chronic rejection (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.94-6.71, P < 0.001; I2 58.19%), and allograft rejection alone (OR 6.43; 95% CI: 3.17-13.04; P < 0.001; I2 49.77%); they were compared to patients without de novo DSAs. The association between de novo DSAs and overall outcome failure was consistent across all subgroups and sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggested that de novo DSAs had a significant deleterious impact on the liver transplant risk of rejection. The routine detection of de novo DSAs may be beneficial as noninvasive biomarker-guided risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Beyzaei
- Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Bita Geramizadeh
- Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Department of Pathology, Medical School of Shiraz University, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Zahra Bagheri
- Department of Biostatistics, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sara Karimzadeh
- Shiraz Medical School Library, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Alireza Shojazadeh
- Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Raghu VK, Rudolph JA, Jalal HJ, Smith KJ. Microsimulation Model to Compare Enteral and Parenteral Iron Supplementation in Children With Intestinal Failure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2020; 45:810-817. [PMID: 32511770 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with chronic intestinal failure have a high prevalence of anemia, commonly from iron deficiency, leading to frequent blood transfusions. No current guideline exists for iron supplementation in these children. In this analysis, we evaluate the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of using parenteral, enteral, and no iron supplementation to reduce blood transfusions. METHODS We created a microsimulation model of pediatric intestinal failure over a 1-year time horizon. Model outcomes included cost (US dollars), blood transfusions received, and hemoglobin trend. Strategies tested included no supplementation, daily enteral supplementation, and monthly parenteral supplementation. We estimated parameters for the model using an institutional cohort of 55 patients. Model parameters updated each 1-month cycle using 2 regressions. A multivariate mixed-effects linear regression estimated hemoglobin values at the next month based on data from the prior month. A mixed-effects logistic regression on hemoglobin predicted the probability of receiving a blood transfusion in a given month. RESULTS Compared with no supplementation, both enteral and parenteral iron supplementation reduced blood transfusions required per patient by 0.3 and 0.5 transfusions per year, respectively. Enteral iron cost $34 per avoided blood transfusion. Parenteral iron cost an additional $6600 per avoided blood transfusion compared with enteral iron. CONCLUSIONS We found both parenteral and enteral iron to be effective at reducing blood transfusions. The cost of enteral iron makes it the desired choice in patients who can tolerate it. Future work should aim to identify which subpopulations of patients may benefit most from one strategy over the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Kalathur Raghu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Rudolph
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hawre J Jalal
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth J Smith
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Immunologic Complications and Graft Survival in Crohn's Disease and NOD2 Mutant Non-Crohn's Disease Adult Recipients Following Intestine Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e556. [PMID: 32607422 PMCID: PMC7266359 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite improved outcomes in the modern era of targeted immunotherapy, intestinal failure and chronic parenteral nutrition remains a significant burden for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) worldwide. Transplantation is a key component of management when a patient with CD suffers from life-threatening complications of parenteral nutrition. Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) mutation is a risk factor for both development of CD and intestinal allograft rejection.
Collapse
|