Comparison of different pancreatic anastomosis techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery: a single surgeon's experience

Pancreatic anastomosis training models: Current status and future directions

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and previous research has focused on patient-related risk factors and comparisons between anastomotic techniques. However, it is recognized that surgeon experience is an important factor in POPF outcomes, and that there is a significant learning curve for the pancreatic anastomosis. The aim of this study was to review the current literature on training models for the pancreatic anastomosis, and to explore areas for future research. It is concluded that research is needed to understand the mechanical properties of the human pancreas in an effort to develop a synthetic model that closely mimics its mechanical properties. Virtual reality (VR) is an attractive alternative to synthetic models for surgical training, and further work is needed to develop a VR pancreatic anastomosis training module that provides both high fidelity and haptic feedback.

A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a classification system for pancreas-associated risk factors in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most relevant PD-associated complication. A simple standardized surgical reporting system based on pancreas-associated risk factors is lacking.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies investigating clinically relevant (CR) POPF (CR-POPF) and pancreas-associated risk factors after PD. A meta-analysis of CR-POPF rate for texture of the pancreas (soft vs not-soft) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) diameter was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Based on the results, the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) proposes the following classification: A, not-soft (hard) texture and MPD >3 mm; B, not-soft (hard) texture and MPD ≤3 mm; C, soft texture and MPD >3 mm; D, soft texture and MPD ≤3 mm. The classification was evaluated in a multi-institutional, international cohort.

RESULTS

Of the 2917 articles identified, 108 studies were included in the analyses. Soft pancreatic texture was significantly associated with the development of CR-POPF [odds ratio (OR) 4.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.67-4.89, P < 0.01) following PD. Similarly, MPD diameter ≤3 mm significantly increased CR-POPF risk compared with >3 mm diameter MPDs (OR 3.66, 95% CI 2.62-5.12, P < 0.01). The proposed 4-stage system was confirmed in an independent cohort of 5533 patients with CR-POPF rates of 3.5%, 6.2%, 16.6%, and 23.2% for type A-D, respectively ( P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

For future pancreatic surgical outcomes studies, the ISGPS recommends reporting these risk factors according to the proposed classification system for better comparability of results.

Does pancreatic duct stent placement lead to decreased postoperative pancreatic fistula rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of pancreatic duct stent placement for preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to February 26, 2022. Studies comparing outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pancreatic duct stents were included. The primary outcome measured was postoperative pancreatic fistula rate, and secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate, reoperation rate, delayed gastric emptying rate and wound infection rate.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving 847 patients met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference between the stent group and non-stent group was detected in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.57-1.26, P = 0.41), in-hospital mortality, reoperation, delayed gastric emptying rate and wound infection. Subgroup analyses revealed that use of an external stent significantly reduced the incidence of pancreatic fistula (RR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.43-0.86, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results from this systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that pancreatic duct stents did not reduce the risk of POPF and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with no stents. External stents were associated with a reduced POPF rate compared with no stents. Large-scale RCTs are required to assess the effectiveness and assist in clarifying the real role of pancreatic duct stents with respect to the POPF rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Validation of a clinical score in predicting pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most severe complications after cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy, with mortality as high as 30%. Risk scores may help predict the risk of POPF. Multiple external validations substantially improve generalized clinical acceptability of a scoring system.

AIM

The aim of this study was to externally validate previously described fistula risk score in the prediction of clinically relevant POPF.

METHODS

All patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for any indication during a 5-year period were prospectively analyzed. A total of 132 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 132 patients, 44 (33.3%) developed pancreatic fistula, including 12.9% biochemical leaks, 7.6% grade B fistula, and 12.9% grade C fistula. Cut-off point of 4.5 was determined to best separate patients who developed clinically relevant POPF with area under curve of 78% (p = .00003). Sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of clinically relevant POPF with the cut-off value of 4.5 was 70.4 and 74.3%, respectively. Positive predictive value with cut-off value 4.5 was 57.8%, and negative predictive value was 83.4%.

CONCLUSION

Fistula risk score identified low risk patients with false negative rate of 16.6%. Further external validation studies on large cohorts of patients and with wide case-mix may enable additional refinements of the score model.

Selection of pancreaticojejunostomy technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: duct-to-mucosa anastomosis is not better than invagination anastomosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

One of the most clinically significant current discussions is the optimal pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) technique for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). We performed a meta-analysis to compare duct-to-mucosa and invagination techniques for pancreatic anastomosis after PD.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to June 1, 2018 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing duct-to-mucosa versus invagination PJ were included. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 1099 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was not significantly different between the duct-to-mucosa PJ (110/547, 20.10%) and invagination PJ (98/552, 17.75%) groups in all 8 studies (risk ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.89-1.44; P = .31). The subgroup analysis using the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula criteria showed no significant difference in POPF between duct-to-mucosa PJ (97/372, 26.08%) and invagination PJ (78/377, 20.68%). No significant difference in clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) was found between the 2 groups (55/372 vs 40/377, P = .38). Additionally, no significant differences in delayed gastric emptying, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, reoperation, operation time, or length of stay were found between the 2 groups. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The duct-to-mucosa technique seems no better than the invagination technique for pancreatic anastomosis after PD in terms of POPF, CR-POPF, and other main complications. Further studies on this topic are therefore recommended.

A web-based overview, systematic review and meta-analysis of pancreatic anastomosis techniques following pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Many pancreatic anastomoses have been proposed to reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreatoduodenectomy, but a complete overview is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide an online overview of all pancreatic anastomosis techniques and to evaluate the incidence of clinically relevant POPF in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A literature search was performed to December 2017. Included were studies giving a detailed description of the pancreatic anastomosis after open pancreatoduodenectomy and RCTs comparing techniques for the incidence of POPF (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery [ISGPS] Grade B/C). Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 61 different anastomoses were found and summarized in 19 subgroups (www.pancreatic-anastomosis.com). In 6 RCTs, the POPF rate was 12% after pancreaticogastrostomy (n = 69/555) versus 20% after pancreaticojejunostomy (n = 106/531) (RR0.59; 95%CI 0.35-1.01, P = 0.05). Six RCTs comparing subtypes of pancreaticojejunostomy showed a pooled POPF rate of 10% (n = 109/1057). Duct-to-mucosa and invagination pancreaticojejunostomy showed similar results, respectively 14% (n = 39/278) versus 10% (n = 27/278) (RR1.40, 95%CI 0.47-4.15, P = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

The proposed online overview can be used as an interactive platform, for uniformity in reporting anastomotic techniques and for educational purposes. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in POPF rate between pancreatic anastomosis techniques.

Application of pancreaticojejunostomy with one-layer suture in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common critical complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and a primary reason for increased mortality and morbidity after PD. To perform a safe pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), a fast and simple technique of duct-to-mucosa PJ with one-layer suture was devised at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 successive cases of PD performed at our hospital from March 2012 to August 2016. Data of perioperative parameters were collected for all PD cases.

RESULTS

A total of 17 (21.0%) cases of morbidity occurred after PD, including 5 (6.1%) cases of POPF (grade A), 8 (9.8%) cases of delayed gastric emptying, 1 (1.2%) case of abdominal infection, and 3 (3.7%) cases of incision infection. The median operative time for the PJ was 7 min. No mortality or relaparotomy was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our technique could significantly reduce the incidence of POPF and other complications after PD and may be a promising technique for pancreaticoenteric anastomosis.

Mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study of 126 patients

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic fistula is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a newly developed technique, namely mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy, in comparison with the conventional use of pancreaticojejunostomy after undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Data was collected from regarding 126 consecutive patients, who underwent the mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy or conventional pancreaticojejunostomy, after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy by one group of surgeons, between the time period of 2005 and 2016. This data was collected retrospectively. Surgical parameters and perioperative outcomes were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients received mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy and 61 underwent conventional pancreaticojejunostomy. There were no substantial differences in surgical parameters, mortality, biliary leakage, delayed gastric emptying, gastrojejunostomy leakage, intra-abdominal fluid collection, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, reoperation, and the total hospital costs between the two groups. Pancreatic fistula rate (15 versus 34%; p = 0.013), overall surgical morbidity (25 versus 43%; p = 0.032), and length of hospital stay (18 ± 9 versus 23 ± 12 days; p = 0.016) were significantly reduced after mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy. Multivariate analysis of the postoperative pancreatic fistula revealed that the independent factors that were highly associated with pancreatic fistula were a soft pancreatic texture and the type of conventional pancreaticojejunostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective single-center study showed that mesh-reinforced pancreaticojejunostomy appears to be a safe technique for pancreaticojejunostomy. It may reduce pancreatic fistula rate and surgical complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This research is waivered from trial registration because it is a retrospective analysis of medical records.

Pancreaticojejunostomy: Does the technique matter? A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Despite a large number of studies, the ideal technique of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains debatable. We compared the two most common techniques of PJ (duct-to-mucosa and dunking) in a randomized trial.

METHODS

This open-label randomized trial was done at a tertiary care center from January 2009 to October 2015. Patients with resectable periampullary tumours with a pancreatic duct diameter ≥2 mm, requiring PD were randomly assigned to one of the two techniques using computer generated random numbers. The primary outcome was postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate and secondary outcomes were frequency of other postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 193 patients were randomized and analyzed (intention-to-treat analysis), 97 in duct-to-mucosa and 96 in dunking group. Both groups were comparable for baseline demographic and clinical profiles. The incidence of POPF in the entire study group was 23.8%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (24.7% vs 22.9%, P = 0.71). Similarly, the incidence of grades B and C (clinically significant) POPF was comparable (16.5% vs 13.5%, P = 0.57). Both groups were comparable with respect to the secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The duct-to-mucosa technique of PJ after PD is not superior to the dunking technique with respect to POPF rate. (CTRI/2010/091/000531).

Risk factors and managements of hemorrhage associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula associated hemorrhage (PPFH) is one of the leading lethal complications. Our study was to analyze the risk factors and managements of hemorrhage associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and to evaluate treatment options.

METHOD

We analyzed 445 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and evaluated the relevance between clinical data and PPFH.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 27.42% (122/445), and the incidence of PPFH was 4.49% (20/445). Among the 20 patients with PPFH, 7 died and 13 were cured. Interventional angiographic therapy was performed for 10 patients and 5 were successfully treated. Relaparotomy was performed for 5 patients and 2 were successfully cured. Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that several risk factors were related to PPFH: the nature of tumor (carcinoid/low-grade or high-grade malignancy), preoperative day 1 serum prealbumin, preoperative day 1 total bilirubin (TBIL), operative time, blood loss in the operation, operative method (vascular resection and revascularization), postoperative day 3 TBIL, biliary fistula, and the grade of POPF. The multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the nature of tumor and the grade of POPF were independently risk factors of PPFH. Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that preoperative day 1 serum prealbumin level <173 mg/L and postoperative day 3 TBIL level ≥168 µmol/L were the risk factors of PPFH.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of PPFH was found to be increased with high potential malignancy and high grade of POPF. Angiography-embolization is one of the major and effective therapies for PPFH. Extraluminal-intraluminal PPFH is more serious and needs more aggressive treatments.

Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated that the use of pancreatic duct stents following pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with a lower risk of pancreatic fistula. However, to date there is a lack of accord in the literature on whether the use of stents is beneficial and, if so, whether internal or external stenting, with or without replacement, is preferable. This is an update of a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of pancreatic stents in preventing pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and four major Chinese biomedical databases up to November 2015. We also searched several major trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of stents (either internal or external) versus no stents, and comparing internal stents versus external stents, replacement versus no replacement following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted the data. The outcomes studied were incidence of pancreatic fistula, need for reoperation, length of hospital stay, overall complications, and in-hospital mortality. We showed the results as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/).

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight studies (1018 participants). The average age of the participants ranged from 56 to 68 years. Most of the studies were conducted in single centers in Japan (four studies), China (two studies), France (one study), and the USA (one study). The risk of bias was low or unclear for most domains across the studies. Stents versus no stentsThe effect of stents on reducing pancreatic fistula in people undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy was uncertain due to the low quality of the evidence (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.14; 605 participants; 4 studies). The risk of in-hospital mortality was 3% in people who did receive stents compared with 2% (95% CI 1% to 6%) in people who had stents (RR 0.73, 0.28 to 1.94; 605 participants; 4 studies; moderate-quality evidence). The effect of stents on reoperation was uncertain due to wide confidence intervals (RR 0.67, 0.36 to 1.22; 512 participants; 3 studies; moderate-quality evidence). We found moderate-quality evidence that using stents reduces total hospital stay by just under four days (mean difference (MD) -3.68, 95% CI -6.52 to -0.84; 605 participants; 4 studies). The risk of delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, and intra-abdominal abscess was uncertain (gastric emptying: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.24 to 2.35; moderate-quality evidence) (wound infection: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.32; moderate-quality evidence) (abscess: RR 1.38, 0.49 to 3.85; low-quality evidence). Subgroup analysis by type of stent provided limited evidence that external stents lead to lower risk of fistula compared with internal stents. External versus internal stentsThe effect of external stents on the risk of pancreatic fistula, reoperation, delayed gastric emptying, and intra-abdominal abscess compared with internal stents was uncertain due to low-quality evidence (fistula: RR 1.44, 0.94 to 2.21; 362 participants; 3 studies) (reoperation: RR 2.02, 95% CI 0.38 to 10.79; 319 participants; 3 studies) (gastric emptying: RR 1.65, 0.66 to 4.09; 362 participants; 3 studies) (abscess: RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 4.58; 362 participants; 3 studies). The rate of in-hospital mortality was lower in studies comparing internal and external stents than in those comparing stents with no stents. One death occurred in the external-stent group (RR 0.33, 0.01 to 7.99; low-quality evidence). There were no cases of pancreatitis in participants who had internal stents compared with three in those who had external stents (RR 0.15, 0.01 to 2.73; low-quality evidence). The difference between internal and external stents on total hospital stay was uncertain due to the wide confidence intervals around the average effect of 1.7 days fewer with internal stents (9.18 days fewer to 5.84 days longer; 262 participants; 2 studies; low-quality evidence). The analysis of wound infection could not exclude a protective effect with either approach (RR 1.41, 0.44 to 4.48; 319 participants; 2 studies; moderate-quality evidence). Operative replacement of pancreatic juice versus not replacing pancreatic juice There was insufficient evidence available from a small trial to ascertain the effect of replacing pancreatic juice.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review has identified limited evidence on the effects of stents. We have not been able to identify convincing direct evidence of superiority of external over internal stents. We found a limited number of RCTs with small sample sizes. Further RCTs on the use of stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy are warranted.

PANasta Trial; Cattell Warren versus Blumgart techniques of panreatico-jejunostomy following pancreato-duodenectomy: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Failure of the pancreatic remnant anastomosis to heal following pancreato-duodenectomy is a major cause of significant and life-threatening complications, notably a post-operative pancreatic fistula. Recently, non-randomized trials have shown superiority of a most intuitive anastomosis (Blumgart technique), which involves both a duct-to-mucosa and a full-thickness pancreatic "U" stitch, in effect a mattress stitch, over a standard duct-mucosa technique (Cattell-Warren). The aim of this study is to examine if these findings remain within a randomized setting.

METHODS/DESIGN

The PANasta trial is a randomized, double-blinded multi-center study, whose primary aim is to assess whether a Blumgart pancreatic anastomosis (trial intervention) is superior to a Cattell-Warren pancreatic anastomosis (control intervention), in terms of pancreatic fistula rates. Patients with suspected malignancy of the pancreatic head, in whom a pancreato-duodenectomy is recommended, would be recruited from several UK specialist regional centers. The hypothesis to be tested is that a Blumgart anastomosis will reduce fistula rate from 20 to 10 %. Subjects will be stratified by research site, pancreatic consistency and diameter of pancreatic duct; giving a sample size of 253 per group. The primary outcome measure is fistula rate at the pancreatico-jejunostomy. Secondary outcome measures are: entry into adjuvant therapy, mortality, surgical complications, non-surgical complications, hospital stay, cancer-specific quality of life and health economic assessments. Enrolled patients will undergo pancreatic resection and be randomized immediately prior to pancreatic reconstruction. The operation note will only record "anastomosis constructed as per PANasta trial randomization," thus the other members of the trial team and patient are blinded. An inbuilt internal pilot study will assess the ability to randomize patients, while the construction of an operative manual and review of operative photographs will maintain standardization of techniques.

DISCUSSION

The PANasta trial will be the first multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing two types of duct-to-mucosa pancreatic anastomosis with surgical quality assurance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN52263879 . Date of registration 15 January 2015.

Evaluation of a recently described risk classification scheme for pancreatic fistulae development after pancreaticoduodenectomy without routine post-operative drainage

BACKGROUND

Post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) formation occurs frequently after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Recently, a 10-point Fistula Risk Score (FRS) evaluating the likelihood of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) development has been described and validated. This scheme has yet to be evaluated in PD patients managed without intra-operative drain placement.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing PD at an academic centre since 2003, a retrospective analysis calculating FRS and its correlation with CR-POPF development was evaluated by logistic regression. Secondary analysis examined presentation and management of CR-POPF in undrained PD patients.

RESULTS

FRS was calculated for 265 patients; 97.7% were managed without operative drains. The overall incidence of CR-POPF was 7.9%. Logistic regression revealed a 1.6-fold increase in CR-POPF risk per 1-point increase in FRS [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.0]. The negative predictive value in patients with FRS <3 was 100%, whereas the positive predictive value of FRS >6 was 16.7%. The median time to CR-POPF diagnosis was 18 days [interquartile range (IQR) 13-23]; 70.0% required readmission and 10.0% required a laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients without operative drainage, CR-POPF often has delayed presentations but most are managed non-operatively. The predictive value of high-risk FRS appears limited; conversely, a low-risk FRS accurately predicts the absence of CR-POPF and seems an appropriate metric for guiding care.

Use and results of consensus definitions in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Because of the lack of standardized definitions of complications in gastrointestinal operations, consensus definitions have been developed in recent years. The aim of the current study was to systematically review the available consensus definitions and to report their use, acceptance, and results.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted of the Medline, Cochrane, and ISI Web of Science databases. All articles published until August 2011 and that applied the identified consensus definitions were considered. Inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis were studies with correct usage of the definition and 100 or more patients who were treated after the year 2000.

RESULTS

Seven consensus definitions were identified: postoperative pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, posthepatectomy liver failure, bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, posthepatectomy hemorrhage, and anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Of 1,637 articles retrieved from the literature search, 59 articles that correctly applied the definitions met the inclusion criteria. Subanalyses were feasible for definitions after pancreatic surgery. According to the consensus definitions, the median complication rates of retrospective studies were 21.9% (postoperative pancreatic fistula, n = 11,244 patients), 5.9% (postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, n = 3,311 patients), and 22.8% (delayed gastric emptying, n = 4,553 patients) after pancreatic resections. The incidences were not substantially different in prospective trials. Validation was performed for all three definitions, demonstrating that the severity grades significantly correlated with the clinical course of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The available consensus definitions were increasingly cited and facilitate scientific comparability and transparency if appropriately applied. The present data update the incidences of major pancreatic complications.

Factors associated with delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

The factors associated with delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are not definitively known.

METHODS

From November 2011 through to May 2012, data were prospectively collected on 711 patients undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy as part of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project. Bivariate and multivariate models were employed to determine the factors that predicted DGE.

RESULTS

In the 711 patients, the overall rate of DGE was 20.1%. In a bivariate analysis, intra-operative factors such as pylorus-preservation (47.1% versus 43.7%, P = 0.40), intra-operative drain placement (85.5%, versus 85.1%, P = 0.91) and an antecolic compared with a retrocolic gastrojejunostomy (60.1% versus 65.1%, P = 0.26) were not different between the DGE and no DGE groups. Pancreatic fistula formation (31.2% versus 10.1%), post-operative sepsis (21.7% versus 7.0%), organ space surgical site infection (SSI) (23.9% versus 7.9%), need for percutaneous drainage (23.0% versus 10.6%) and reoperation (10.6% versus 3.1%) were higher in patients with DGE (P < 0.0001). In a multivariable model, only pancreatic fistula, post-operative sepsis and reoperation were independently associated with DGE.

DISCUSSION

In this multicentre study, only post-operative complications were associated with DGE. Neither pylorus preservation nor route of enteric reconstruction (antecolic versus retrocolic) was associated with delayed gastric emptying.

Pancreatic Remnant Occlusion after Whipple's Procedure: An Alternative Oncologically Safe Method

Introduction. To present our experience regarding the use of pancreatic stump occlusion technique as an alternative management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Methods. Between 2002 and 2009, hospital records of 93 patients who had undergone a Whipple's procedure for either pancreatic-periampullary cancer or chronic pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. In 37 patients the pancreatic duct was occluded by stapling and running suture without anastomosis of the pancreatic remnant, whereas in 56 patients a pancreaticojejunostomy was performed. Operative data, postoperative complications, oncological parameters, and survival rates were recorded. Results. 2/37 patients of the occlusion group and 9/56 patients of the anastomosis group were treated for chronic pancreatitis, whereas 35/37 and 47/56 patients for periampullary malignancies. The duration of surgery for the anastomosis group was significantly longer (mean time 220 versus 180 minutes). Mean hospitalization time was 6 days for both groups. The occlusion group had a lower morbidity rate (24% versus 32%). With regard to postoperative complications, a slightly higher incidence of pancreatic fistulas was observed in the anastomosis group. Conclusions. Pancreatic remnant occlusion is a safe, technically feasible, and reducing postoperative complications alternative approach of the pancreatic stump during Whipple's procedure.

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database

BACKGROUND

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a dreaded complication in pancreatic surgery. Today, there is a definition and grading of PPH without therapeutic consensus. We reviewed our prospective database to identify predictors and assess therapeutic strategy.

METHOD

We included all patients who underwent pancreatectomy between 2005 and 2010. Data were collected prospectively. We used the International Study Group Of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition for PPH to include patients in the PPH group.

RESULTS

Forty-six of 285 patients showed a PPH (16.1 %). The ISGPS classification was graded A = 3, B = 26, and C = 17. The average time to the onset of PPH was 7 days. CT-scan identified the origin of PPH in 43.5 % of the cases. PPH was responsible for a longer duration of hospital stay (p = 0.004), a higher hospital mortality (21.7 vs 2.5 %, p < 0.0001) and a lower survival (40 vs 70 % (p = 0.05) at 36 months). The first-intention treatment of PPH was conservative in 32 % and interventional in 68 %: endoscopy (6.4 %), transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE, 30.4 %), and surgical (30.4 %). In multivariate analysis, predictors of PPH were: pancreatic fistula (24 vs 8 % p = 0.028), pancreatoduodenectomy (70 vs 43 % p = 0.029), age (61.6 vs 58.8 %, p = 0.03), and nutritional risk index (NRI) (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

In our series, risk factors for PPH were age, pancreatic fistula, pancreatoduodenectomy, and NRI. Its occurrence is associated with significantly higher hospital mortality and a lower survival rate. Our first-line treatment was radiological TAE. Surgical treatment is offered in case of failure of interventional radiology or in case of uncontrolled hemodynamic.

Application of "papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated" pancreaticojejunostomy for normal soft pancreas cases

Pancreaticojejunostomy is the key procedure of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Our study introduced a new pancreaticojejunal (PJ) anastomosis named "papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated" pancreaticojejunostomy. Nighty-two patients underwent pancreaticojejunostomy with either conventional duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy or the new "papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated" techniques were analyzed retrospectively from January 2010 to September 2012. The incidence of pancreatic fistula was 15.7% (8/51) for the "papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated" group and 19.5% (8/41) for the duct-to-mucosa fashion respectively. It is noteworthy that the rate of grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in the "papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated" group was significantly lower than that of the duct-to-mucosa group (P = 0.039). There were no differences in the incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality such as postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying or remnant pancreatitis. The "papillary-like main pancreatic duct invaginated" pancreaticojejunostomy could provide a feasible option to pancreatic surgeons for patients with normal soft pancreas.

Long-term effects of pancreaticoduodenectomy on glucose metabolism

BACKGROUND

  To analyse the association between pancreatogenic diabetes and the volume of the remnant pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy and to identify clinicopathologic factors correlated with pancreatogenic diabetes.

METHODS

  Among the patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenenctomy from 2003 to 2004, 55 patients who survived by 2009 and were able to measure the volume of the pancreas pre- and post-operatively by CT volumetry were included in this study. Twelve patients had diabetes before surgery. Median follow-up duration was 55.2 and 67.3 months for CT volumetry, pancreatogenic diabetes, respectively.

RESULTS

  Among 43 patients without preoperative diabetes, nine patients (21%) developed newly diabetes after surgery. Among 12 patients with diabetes, 10 patients had worsened glucose control. The immediate post-operative Vol% was 46.5% and the last Vol% was 31.5% (P < 0.001). Preoperative diabetes, malignant pathology, absence of post-operative pancreatic fistula, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were correlated with a lower Vol%. Atrophic changes were observed in 29 patients and hypertrophic changes in 13 patients. Comparative analysis according to the change in the Vol% revealed no differences in the clinicopathological factors associated with new-onset pancreatogenic diabetes or aggravation of preoperative diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

  While some patients had a hypertrophic pancreas at the last follow-up, which reflected the capacity for pancreatic regeneration and some factors were associated with a lower volume of the remnant pancreas, the volume of the remnant pancreas seem not to be associated with pancreatogenic diabetes. There were no clinicopathologic factors identified associated with the risk for pancreatogenic diabetes.

Pancreatic stump-closed pancreaticojejunostomy can be performed safely in normal soft pancreas cases

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic anastomotic failure remains the main reason for morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and there is no existing flawless pancreaticojejunal reconstruction approach to this date, especially for the normal soft pancreas cases.

METHODS

We compared a pancreatic stump-closed pancreaticojejunostomy technique (group B; n = 33) with conventional duct-to-mucosa fashion (group A; n = 30) retrospectively in 63 normal soft pancreatic texture cases. Some operative related data including postoperative complications, anastomosis time, hospital stay days, mortality rate, and relaparotomy rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no difference concerning the incidences of postoperative morbidity, including pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, intra-abdominal abscess, and remnant pancreatitis between two groups. The differences of anastomosis time, hospitalization days, relaparotomy rate, and mortality rate were also not significant. However, group B patients had a shorter duration (d) for healing of postoperative pancreatic fistula than group A (15.3 ± 8.5 versus 33.0 ± 14.1 d, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For the normal soft pancreas cases, pancreatic stump-closed pancreaticojejunostomy technique is quite safe and convenient according to our experience; ideal clinical results could be achieved with its application in the future.

Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress score does not predict immediate outcome after pancreatic surgery

OBJECTIVE

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress score was designed to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery. Our study aims to evaluate its use and accuracy in estimating postoperative outcome after elective pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2007, approximately 304 patients requiring pancreatic resection at our institution were recorded prospectively and evaluated retrospectively. The patients' preoperative risk score, surgical stress score (SSS), and comprehensive risk score (CRS) were calculated and compared with the severity of postoperative morbidity, where mortality was regarded as the most severe postoperative complication.

RESULTS

Observed and predicted mortality rates were 2.9% and 2.0%, respectively. Mean CRS was higher in patients who died than in patients that survived, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.20). Preoperative risk score, SSS, and CRS did not differ between patients with and without complications (preoperative risk score: P = 0.32; SSS: P = 0.22; CRS: P = 0.13). Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress particularly underpredicted morbidity in patients with a CRS between 0.0 and less than 0.5.

CONCLUSIONS

The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress scoring system is an ineffective predictor of complications after pancreatic resection. Further refinements to the score calculation are warranted to provide accurate prediction of immediate surgical outcome after pancreatic surgery.

Does the type of pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple alter the leak rate?

Despite the overwhelming limitations that plague the literature surrounding the optimal method of reestablishing pancreatico-enteric continuity following a Whipple operation, it is clear that all successful techniques conform to sound surgical principles. These principles include a water-tight and tension-free anastomosis, preservation of adequate blood supply for both organs involved in the anastomosis, and minimal trauma to the pancreas gland. Although surgeon experience, gland texture, and pancreatic duct size are clearly the dominate risk factors from a long list of variables associated with pancreatic leaks following pancreatoduodenectomy, these are nonmodifiable covariates. Although the plethora of current literature cannot provide a single definitive technical solution for restoring pancreatico-enteric continuity, a small number of well-designed RCTs support the use of transanastomotic external stenting for high-risk pancreatic glands and an end-to-side invaginated pancreaticojejunostomy. The truth remains that an individual surgeon's mastery of a specific anastomotic technique, in conjunction with a large personal experience, is likely to be the best predictor of a low pancreas leak rate following pancreatoduodenectomy.