1
|
Forootan M, Repici A, Rajabnia M, Karimi MA, Jahanian A, Ketabi Moghadam P, Mohammadi M, Ghadirzadeh E, Soudi A, Paraandavaji E, Shafiei S, Reza Zali M, Tashakoripour M. Endoscopic resection of polypoid solitary rectal ulcer: A novel first-line therapeutic strategy using snare-assisted mucosal and fibrosis resection. DEN OPEN 2026; 6:e70108. [PMID: 40353216 PMCID: PMC12061551 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.70108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Revised: 03/17/2025] [Accepted: 03/21/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
Abstract
Objectives To propose a novel first-line endoscopic therapy for treating polypoid lesions in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (P-SRUS), the rarest and most challenging subtype of SRUS, which encompasses various endoscopic findings including mucosal erythema, superficial or deep ulcers, and polypoid lesions. Methods A prospective, single-arm study was conducted on 56 patients with histologically confirmed SRUS and broad-based polypoid lesions in the rectum and anal canal. These patients were referred to the Department of Motility Disorders of the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract. The lesions were removed using snare-assisted mucosal and fibrosis resection. Patients were monitored for clinical and endoscopic responses at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. Results The study observed improvement in clinical symptoms, a complete endoscopic response, and the absence of late complications following endoscopic resection. Endoscopic evaluations revealed no recurrence of lesions in the follow-up period. Conclusion Endoscopic resection using the snare-assisted mucosal and fibrosis resection method appears to be an effective and safe treatment option for polypoid SRUS. (Clinical Trial Registration Number: IRCT20211101052935N2).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mojgan Forootan
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | | | - Mohsen Rajabnia
- Non‐communicable Disease Research CenterAlborz University of Medical SciencesKarajIran
| | - Mohammad Ali Karimi
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Ali Jahanian
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Pardis Ketabi Moghadam
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mahsa Mohammadi
- Non‐Communicable Disease ResearchAlborz University of Medical SciencesKarajIran
| | - Erfan Ghadirzadeh
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
- Cardiovascular Research CenterMazandaran University of Medical SciencesSariIran
| | - Abdorraoof Soudi
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Elham Paraandavaji
- Skull Base Research CenterShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Sasan Shafiei
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mohammad Reza Zali
- Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver DiseasesShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Mohammad Tashakoripour
- Department of GastroenterologyAmiralam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sawhney M, Madan J, Nath D, Bhatia A, Tiwari N, Shukla U. Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome - A Rare Entity in the Pediatric Population. Turk Patoloji Derg 2025; 41:16-20. [PMID: 39840514 PMCID: PMC11831963 DOI: 10.5146/tjpath.2025.13667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study and correlate the clinicopathological findings of Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) in 10 pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study is a retrospective study of patients from January 2017 to June 2024. The clinical records were reviewed for details of the clinical presentation, colonoscopic findings, associated local and systemic diseases, and other investigations. RESULTS The mean age of presentation was 10±1 years, and the youngest child was 6 years old. The most common clinical presentation was rectal bleeding and a single ulcer on endoscopy. Histological findings included crypt distortion, crypt branching, and fibromuscular obliteration of the lamina propria. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA) and special staining with Masson Trichrome (MT) were used to highlight fibromuscular areas whenever in doubt. CONCLUSION The pathogenesis of SRUS is not well understood. It may be associated with chronic mucosal and hypoperfusion-induced ischemic injury to the rectal mucosa due to trauma or increased rectal pressure during straining. Solitary rectal ulcer is a misnomer, as the patient may present with multiple or no ulcers. Endoscopy and histopathology help to diagnose SRUS. Timely and correct diagnosis reduces the morbidity associated with this entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megha Sawhney
- Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India
| | - Jyotsna Madan
- Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India
| | - Devajit Nath
- Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India
| | - Akanksha Bhatia
- Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India
| | - Neema Tiwari
- Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India
| | - Umesh Shukla
- Department of Pathology, Post Graduate Institute of Child Health, Noida, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gaj F, Lai Q, Gelormini E, Ceci M, Di Saverio S, Quaresima S. Efficacy of surgical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:1515-1534. [PMID: 38957108 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
AIM Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign and poorly understood disorder with complex management. Typical symptoms include straining during defaecation, rectal bleeding, tenesmus, mucoid secretion, anal pain and a sense of incomplete evacuation. Diagnosis is based on characteristic clinical symptoms and endoscopic/histological findings. Several treatments have been reported in the literature with variable ulcer healing rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments for SRUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies in English, French and Spanish languages were included. Papers written in other languages were excluded. Other exclusion criteria were reviews, case reports or clinical series enrolling less than five patients, study duplications, no clinical data of interest and no article available. A systematic literature search was conducted from January 2000 to March 2024 using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. The biases of the studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale or the Jadad scale when appropriate. Types of treatment and their efficacy for the cure of SRUS were collected and critically assessed. The study's primary outcome was to estimate the rate of patients with ulcer healing. RESULTS A total of 22 studies with 911 patients (men 361, women 550) diagnosed with SRUS were analysed in the final meta-analysis. The pooled effect estimates of treatment efficacy revealed that surgery showed the highest ulcer healing rate (70.5%; 95% CI 0.57-0.83). Surgery was superior in the cure of ulcers with respect to medical therapies and biofeedback (OR 0.09 and OR 0.14). CONCLUSION Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a challenging clinical entity to manage. Proficient results have been reported with the surgical approach, suggesting its positive role in cases refractory to medical and biofeedback therapy. Further studies in homogeneous populations are required to evaluate the efficacy of surgery in this setting. (PROSPERO registration number CRD42022331422).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Gaj
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties 'Paride Stefanini', Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Quirino Lai
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties 'Paride Stefanini', Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Enza Gelormini
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties 'Paride Stefanini', Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Marino Ceci
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties 'Paride Stefanini', Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- ASUR Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Silvia Quaresima
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Specialties 'Paride Stefanini', Sapienza University of Rome, AOU Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Varol Fİ, Güngör Ş, Selimoğlu MA, Şamdancı E. Rare Cause of Hematochezia in Children: Solitary Rectal Ulcer, Single Center Experience. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = TAEHAN SOHWAGI HAKHOE CHI 2024; 83:17-22. [PMID: 38268164 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2023.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Background/Aims Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) can be overlooked, diagnosed late, or misdiagnosed, particularly in childhood. This study reviewed the 13-year experience of the authors' institution to increase clinicians' awareness of SRUS in the presence of symptoms. This paper reports the endoscopic and histopathological findings in children presenting with hematochezia. Methods The clinical and laboratory findings of 22 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven SRUS in the authors' clinic between 2007 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Results The mean age at diagnosis was 12.5±2.6 years, and 59.1% of the patients were male. The median time of diagnosis was 24 months. A single ulcer lesion was found by colonoscopy in 18 patients (81.8%), two ulcers in two patients (9%), and more than two ulcers in two patients (9%). The pathology reports of all biopsies taken from the lesions were consistent with a solitary rectal ulcer. In the first stage, the treatment was started with toilet training, a high-fiber diet, and laxatives. In 11 patients (50%) who did not respond to the initial treatment, a 5-ASA enema was added. A glucocorticoid enema was added to treatment in five patients (22%) whose complaints did not regress despite this treatment. Clinical remission was achieved in five of the patients (18.1%). The time to diagnosis was significantly shorter in those in remission than those not in remission (p=0.04). Conclusions This study is the first large series on Turkish children. An increased awareness of SRUS in children will increase the rate of early diagnosis and treatment, allowing remission in more patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma İlknur Varol
- Departments of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, İnönü University, Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Şükrü Güngör
- Departments of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, İnönü University, Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Mukadder Ayşe Selimoğlu
- Departments of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, İnönü University, Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Emine Şamdancı
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abusharifah O, Bokhary RY, Mosli MH, Saadah OI. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children and adolescents: a descriptive clinicopathologic study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY 2021; 14:399-407. [PMID: 33936361 PMCID: PMC8085826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon disorder of the rectum. While benign, it can cause concern for patients and affect quality of life. Reported studies on SRUS worldwide are scarce. The aim of this study is to describe the clinicopathologic characteristics of SRUS in a cohort of children based in Saudi Arabia. In this study, children with a confirmed diagnosis of SRUS at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) were included, during the period November 2003 to November 2017. Data were collected from hospital medical records. The study comprised twenty-one patients: 17 males (81%) and 4 females (19%); the median age was 11.4 years (range, 5.43-17.9 years). The most common presenting symptoms were rectal bleeding in 21 patients (100%), passage of mucus in 16 (76.1%), abdominal pain in 14 (66.6%), constipation in 13 (61.9%), straining in 9 (42.9%), and rectal prolapse in 5 (23.8%). The most common finding at initial colonoscopy was a single ulcer in 7 patients (33.3%), multiple ulcers in 6 (28.5%), polypoid lesions in 5 (23.8%), and hyperemic mucosa in 3 (14.2%). All patients received medical treatment and 14 (81%) continued to manifest one or more of the symptoms following treatment, which required subsequent modification of the treatment course. None of the patients required surgery. In conclusion, the study found rectal bleeding to be the most common presentation, with a single ulcer being the most prevalent lesion in endoscopy. Treatment response was variable, but almost half of patients reported relief of symptoms following treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ohood Abusharifah
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Departemnt of Pediatrics, Maternity and Children HospitalAbha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rana Y Bokhary
- The Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mahmoud H Mosli
- The Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Omar I Saadah
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz UniversityJeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is said to be rare in children (largest series so far; 55 in children, 116 in adults). We analyzed our experience to look at its clinical presentations, endoscopic appearance, and treatment outcome in a large cohort of children. METHODS Clinical and endoscopic data were collected between 2000 and 2018. Children (18 years or younger) diagnosed to have SRUS on colonoscopy and confirmed by histopathology were included. All children with SRUS were treated with behavioral modification, bulk laxative. Most with ulcer received steroid enema and some sulfasalazine or sucralfate enema. RESULTS The median age of 140 children was 12 (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-14) years, 79% were boys. The median symptom duration was 21 (IQR: 9-36) months. Rectal bleeding was the presenting feature in 131 (93.6%); constipation in 38 (27%); and small, frequent stools in 79 (56%). Most children had features of dyssynergic defecation such as prolonged sitting in the toilet (131, 93.6%), excessive straining (138, 98.6%), a feeling of incomplete evacuation (130, 92.8%), and rectal digitation (71, 50.7%). Rectal prolapse was noted in 24 (17%) cases. Colonoscopy documented rectal ulcer in 101 (72%) [Single: 84]. Over a median follow-up of 6 (IQR: 4-18) months, 27 patients were lost to follow-up and of the remaining 113 cases, 71 (62.8%) showed clinical improvement (healing of ulcer documented in 36/82, 44%). CONCLUSIONS The majority of cases of SRUS presented in second decade with rectal bleeding and features of dyssynergic defecation. Ulcer was noted in three fourths of cases. The outcome of medical treatment with behavioral modification and local therapy was modest.
Collapse
|
7
|
Thirumal P, Sumathi B, Nirmala D. A Clinical Entity Often Missed-Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children. Front Pediatr 2020; 8:396. [PMID: 32766189 PMCID: PMC7379901 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome (SRUS) was a relatively uncommon and easily misdiagnosed clinical entity in children. The diagnosis of this condition was often delayed due to lack of clinical suspicion. Only case series were available and no definitive treatment was postulated. Here, we share our experience of SRUS in our institute and reviewed the literature published so far. Aim: To study the clinical profile and treatment response of Solitary Rectal ulcer Syndrome in Children (SRUS). Materials: The clinical profile and 1 year follow up response of the diagnosed cases of SRUS over a period of 5 years was retrospectively collected from medical record department. Results: The median age of presentation among 24 children was 8 years with majority (75%) above 5 years. All children presented with intermittent rectal bleeding with median duration of 5.5 months. The other presenting symptoms documented were hard stool (79%), mucorrhea (70%), and abdominal pain (58%). One child presented with rectal prolapse. On colonoscopy, 46% had single ulcer while another 46% had multiple ulcers and 8% had polypoidal lesion. All lesions were within distal rectum and had characteristic histological pattern. All children were treated with conventional treatment like dietary fibers and laxatives along with toilet training. About 75% children attained remission and 25% had relapse but responded with corticosteroid enema. None required surgery. Conclusion: Conventional treatments itself induce and maintain remission in most of SRUS patients if treatment is instituted at the earliest. Thus, early suspicion and diagnosis is needed to achieve remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Thirumal
- Gastroenterology Clinic, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India
| | - B Sumathi
- Gastroenterology, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Chennai, India
| | - D Nirmala
- Gastroenterology, Institute of Child Health and Hospital for Children, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Qari Y, Mosli M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2019; 26:4-12. [PMID: 31898642 PMCID: PMC7045767 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_213_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign, poorly understood disorder that is difficult to manage. Medical interventions such as sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, and a high fibre diet are reported as the first line of treatment. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of medical treatments for SRUS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCT) and observational studies that evaluated medical treatments for SRUS. Two authors independently performed selection of eligible studies based on eligiblity criteria. Data extraction from potentially eligible studies was carried out according to predefined data collection methods. Medical treatments, including sucralfate, sulfasalzine, human fibrin, a high fibre diet, and psyllium powder as a single or combination therapy were compared to placebo alone or combined with other treatments. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ulcer remission; this was presented as pooled prevalence (PP) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The I2 value and Q statistic test were used to test for heterogeneity. In the presence of heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied. RESULTS A total of 9 studies with 216 patients (males = 118, females = 98) diagnosed with SRUS were analysed in the final meta-analysis. The pooled effect estimate of treatment efficacy revealed that, of the patients receiving medical treatment, 57% had resolution of their ulcers (PP 0.57; 95% CI; 0.41 to 0.73). Statistically significant heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 63%; τ2 = 0.64, P= <0.01). The scarcity of RCTs comparing medical treatments with other interventions was a major limitation. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients receiving medical treatment for the management of SRUS experience resolution of their ulcers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousef Qari
- Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mahmoud Mosli
- Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia,Address for correspondence: Dr. Mahmoud Mosli, Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abreu M, Azevedo Alves R, Pinto J, Campos M, Aroso S. Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome: A Paediatric Case Report. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2017; 24:142-146. [PMID: 28848799 DOI: 10.1159/000450900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Revised: 09/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon benign rectal disease. Mostly young adults are affected, and it is rare in paediatric populations. CLINICAL CASE We present a 12-year-old girl with a 6-month history of tenesmus, frequent defaecation, and bloody stools with mucus. There was no previous history of constipation or other symptoms. At the first visit, physical examination and routine laboratory test results were normal. A stool examination for bacteria and parasites was negative. Colonoscopy revealed a single ulcer in the distal rectum 6 cm from the anal margin. SRUS was confirmed by biopsy. Despite conservative measures, the symptoms persisted. A defaecation proctography showed a small rectocele with no rectal mucosal prolapse. Because of its proximity to the anal sphincter, no surgical intervention was performed. CONCLUSION The present case illustrates how difficult the management of SRUS is. Multicentre studies are needed to establish treatment protocols for children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlene Abreu
- Pediatric Department, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal
| | | | - João Pinto
- Department of Pathology, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal
| | - Miguel Campos
- Pediatric Surgery Department, São João Hospital Centre, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Aroso
- Pediatric Department, Local Health Unit of Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Children: A Case Series Study. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2017; 1020:105-112. [DOI: 10.1007/5584_2017_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
11
|
Dehghani SM, Bahmanyar M, Geramizadeh B, Alizadeh A, Haghighat M. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: Is it really a rare condition in children? World J Clin Pediatr 2016; 5:343-348. [PMID: 27610352 PMCID: PMC4978629 DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v5.i3.343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of the children with solitary rectal ulcer.
METHODS: Fifty-five children with a confirmed diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer were studied in a period of 11 years from March 2003 to March 2014. All data were collected from the patients, their parents and medical records in the hospital.
RESULTS: From 55 studied patients, 41 were male (74.5%) and 14 female (25.5%). The mean age of the patients was 10.4 ± 3.7 years and the average time period from the beginning of symptoms to diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer was 15.5 ± 11.2 mo. The most common clinical symptoms in our patients were rectal bleeding (n = 54, 98.2%) and straining during defecation or forceful defecation (n = 50, 90.9%). Other symptoms were as follows respectively: Sense of incomplete evacuation (n = 34, 61.8%), mucorrhea (n = 29, 52.7%), constipation (n = 14, 25.4%), tenesmus and cramping (n = 10, 18.2%), diarrhea (n = 9, 16.4%), and rectal pain (n = 5, 9.1%). The colonoscopic examination revealed 67.3% ulcer, 12.7% polypoid lesions, 10.9% erythema, 7.3% both polypoid lesions and ulcer, and 1.8% normal. Most of the lesions were in the rectosigmoid area at a distance of 4-6 cm from the anal margin. Finally, 69.8% of the patients recovered successfully with conservative, medical and surgical management.
CONCLUSION: The study revealed that solitary rectal ulcer is not so uncommon despite what was seen in previous studies. As the most common symptom was rectal bleeding, clinicians and pathologists should be familiar with this disorder and common symptoms in order to prevent its complications with early diagnosis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the evaluation and management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) in children. The common etiologies at different ages are reviewed. Conditions with endoscopic importance for diagnosis or therapy include solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, polyps, vascular lesions, and colonic inflammation and ulceration. Diagnostic modalities for identifying causes of LGIB in children include endoscopy and colonoscopy, cross-sectional and nuclear medicine imaging, video capsule endoscopy, and enteroscopy. Pre-endoscopic preparation and decision-making unique to pediatrics is highlighted. The authors conclude with a summary of current and emerging therapeutic hemostatic techniques that can be used in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Sahn
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Steven & Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, North Shore - Long Island Jewish Health System, 1991 Marcus Avenue, Suite M 100, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA.
| | - Samuel Bitton
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Steven & Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, North Shore - Long Island Jewish Health System, 1991 Marcus Avenue, Suite M 100, New Hyde Park, NY 11042, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Jannin V, Lemagnen G, Gueroult P, Larrouture D, Tuleu C. Rectal route in the 21st Century to treat children. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2014; 73:34-49. [PMID: 24871671 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2013] [Revised: 02/07/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The rectal route can be considered a good alternative to the oral route for the paediatric population because these dosage forms are neither to be swallowed nor need to be taste-masked. Rectal forms can also be administered in an emergency to unconscious or vomiting children. Their manufacturing cost is low with excipients generally regarded as safe. Some new formulation strategies, including mucoadhesive gels and suppositories, were introduced to increase patient acceptability. Even if recent paediatric clinical studies have demonstrated the equivalence of the rectal route with others, in order to enable the use of this promising route for the treatment of children in the 21st Century, some effort should be focused on informing and educating parents and care givers. This review is the first ever to address all the aforementioned items, and to list all drugs used in paediatric rectal forms in literature and marketed products in developed countries.
Collapse
|
15
|
Albenberg LG, Mamula P, Brown K, Baldassano RN, Russo P. Colitis in Infancy and Childhood. PATHOLOGY OF PEDIATRIC GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASE 2014:197-248. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-54053-0_6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
16
|
Urgancı N, Kalyoncu D, Eken KG. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a report of six cases. Gut Liver 2013; 7:752-5. [PMID: 24312719 PMCID: PMC3848538 DOI: 10.5009/gnl.2013.7.6.752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2013] [Revised: 06/21/2013] [Accepted: 07/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare, benign disorder in children that usually presents with rectal bleeding, constipation, mucous discharge, prolonged straining, tenesmus, lower abdominal pain, and localized pain in the perineal area. The underlying etiology is not well understood, but it is secondary to ischemic changes and trauma in the rectum associated with paradoxical contraction of the pelvic floor and the external anal sphincter muscles; rectal prolapse has also been implicated in the pathogenesis. This syndrome is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings, but SRUS often goes unrecognized or is easily confused with other diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, amoebiasis, malignancy, and other causes of rectal bleeding such as a juvenile polyps. SRUS should be suspected in patients experiencing rectal discharge of blood and mucus in addition to previous disorders of evacuation. We herein report six pediatric cases with SRUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nafiye Urgancı
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dehghani SM, Malekpour A, Haghighat M. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: a literature review. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:6541-6545. [PMID: 23236227 PMCID: PMC3516213 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2012] [Revised: 09/20/2012] [Accepted: 09/29/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign and chronic disorder well known in young adults and less in children. It is often related to prolonged excessive straining or abnormal defecation and clinically presents as rectal bleeding, copious mucus discharge, feeling of incomplete defecation, and rarely rectal prolapse. SRUS is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings. The current treatments are suboptimal, and despite correct diagnosis, outcomes can be unsatisfactory. Some treatment protocols for SRUS include conservative management such as family reassurance, regulation of toilet habits, avoidance of straining, encouragement of a high-fiber diet, topical treatments with salicylate, sulfasalazine, steroids and sucralfate, and surgery. In children, SRUS is relatively uncommon but troublesome and easily misdiagnosed with other common diseases, however, it is being reported more than in the past. This condition in children is benign; however, morbidity is an important problem as reflected by persistence of symptoms, especially rectal bleeding. In this review, we discuss current diagnosis and treatment for SRUS.
Collapse
|
18
|
|