Handling Errors in the Use of Inhalation Devices: Inhalation Technique Skills and Knowledge in Pediatric Nurses

Pediatric asthma inhaler technique: quality and content analysis of YouTube videos

BACKGROUND

Proper technique for using inhalers is crucial in treating pediatric asthma. YouTube offers a wide range of videos on pediatric inhaler technique, but there is a need to analyze the quality, reliability, and content of these resources.

AIMS

This study aims to analyze the quality, reliability, and content of YouTube videos on pediatric asthma inhaler techniques.

METHODS

The study has a descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional design. The research was conducted by searching YouTube using the "Pediatric Metered Dose Inhaler," "Pediatric Accuhaler," and "Pediatric Diskus." The video's popularity was measured using the Video Power Index. The quality and reliability of the videos were evaluated using the modified DISCERN and Global Quality Scale (GQS).

RESULTS

This study analyzed 55 YouTube videos on the pediatric inhaler technique. 19 of the videos were related to the pMDI inhaler with a spacer for tidal breathing, 14 pMDI inhaler with a spacer for single breath, and 22 diskus device. Findings show that videos demonstrating the use of pMDI devices for single breath have more reliable modified DISCERN scores. However, videos related to tidal breathing are more popular than those showing the use of diskus devices and single breath. Based on the checklist for videos on diskus devices, the steps with the highest error rates are 'Check dose counter' at 72.7% and 'Breathe out gently, away from the inhaler' at 63.6%. A moderate correlation was observed between the modified DISCERN score and the GQS.

CONCLUSIONS

While YouTube videos on the pMDI single-breath technique may be useful for pediatric patients and caregivers, it is crucial for them to receive inhaler technique education from their healthcare provider. This study's findings hold great significance for pediatric patients and caregivers, particularly those who rely on YouTube for health-related information.

A Training for Parents Prevents Clinically Relevant Handling Errors in the Use of Long-Term Antiseizure Medication

BACKGROUND

Medication handling errors (ME) in long-term antiseizure medication (ASM) compromise patient safety. Training programs to prevent those errors by parents are scarce.

PATIENTS

The intervention concept is designed for parents of children and adolescents aged 0-18 years with at least one long-term ASM.

METHOD

In a controlled prospective study, we assessed ME of ASM during home visits 3-6 weeks after a patient's in- or outpatient hospital visit (outpatient neuropediatric clinic and Social-Pediatric Center (SPZ)). We investigated the effectiveness of a patient specific, risk-adapted training (intervention group, IG) compared to routine care (control group, CG). For 54 ME in ASM handling, an expert panel classified the clinical risk ranging from Score-0 (no risk) to Score-6 (maximum risk) with the lowest risk actually classified as Score-3.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 83 parents in the CG and 85 in the IG who administered 140 ASM per group. The intervention reduced ME per patient from 5 (median; Q25/Q75 3/9) to 4 (2/8; p=0.018). A total number of 589 ME occurred in the CG, 432 in the IG. ME in ASM handling rated Score-6 occurred once in the CG and not in the IG. A relative-risk-reduction (RRR) of ME (with p<0.001) was observed, with a RRR of 55.0% for Score-5, 27.6% for Score-4, and 23.1% for Score-3. RRR was 56.6% for ASM preparation (p<0.001) and 22.4% for oral administration (p=0.045).

CONCLUSION

Compared to controls, ME with high clinical risk significantly decreased in the IG after the training. Drug safety in chronically ill children with ASM was thereby improved.

How Intuitive Is the Administration of Pediatric Emergency Medication Devices for Parents? Objective Observation and Subjective Self-Assessment

BACKGROUND

to assess the intuitiveness of parents' administration of pediatric emergency devices (inhalation, rectal, buccal, nasal, and auto-injector).

METHODS

We invited parents without prior experience to administer the five devices to dummy dolls. We observed whether the parents chose the correct administration route and subsequently performed the correct administration procedures without clinically relevant errors. We interviewed parents for their self-assessment of their own administration performance and willingness to administer devices in actual emergencies.

RESULTS

The correct administration route was best for the inhalation device (81/84, 96% of parents) and worst for the intranasal device (25/126, 20%). The correct administration procedures were best for the buccal device (63/98, 64%) and worst for the auto-injector device (0/93, 0%). Their own administration performance was rated to be best by parents for the inhalation device (59/84, 70%) and worst for the auto-injector device (17/93, 18%). The self-assessment of the correct administration overestimated the correct administration procedures for all the devices except the buccal one. Most parents were willing to administer the inhalation device in an emergency (67/94, 79%), while the fewest were willing to administration procedures the auto-injector device (28/93, 30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intuitiveness concerning the correct administration route and the subsequent correct administration procedures have to be improved for all the devices examined. The parents mostly overestimated their performance. Willingness to use a device in an actual emergency depended on the device.