Obese women's perceptions and experiences of healthcare and primary care providers: a phenomenological study

Characterizing obesity: A qualitative study

Background

The prevalence of obesity among US adults has risen over the past several decades. In addition to bariatric surgery and behavioral weight management, several effective anti-obesity medications have emerged in the last ten years and become increasingly available. The goal of this qualitative study is to explore the perspectives of people with obesity (PwO), health professionals (HPs), and payors on obesity management and treatments.

Methods

This was a 3-group interview study using a qualitative description approach with a target sample size of 40 PwO, 30 HPs who provide care to PwO (10 primary care providers; 10 providers specializing in obesity medicine; and 10 nurse practitioners, physician assistants, or dieticians/nutritionists), and 10 payors. PwO were eligible if they had a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 using self-reported height and weight and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) BMI calculator and were recruited via an online research registry. Health professionals and payors were recruited via direct contact from the research team and sponsor's professional networks in the United States.

Results

A total of 38 PwO, 30 HPs, and 6 payors were interviewed, with PwO interviews occurring from October 2023 to March 2024 and HP/payor interviews occurring from November 2023 to May 2024. The majority of participants in each group accepted the idea of obesity as a chronic disease and that discussing obesity and weight management was important in medical contexts; however, they also acknowledged that stigma around obesity negatively impacted PwO health and health care. All participants described a treatment landscape beginning with lifestyle interventions followed by pharmaceutical or surgical treatment options.

Conclusion

This qualitative study of people with obesity, health professionals, and payors demonstrated current views of addressing and treating obesity in clinical settings. These findings could spur person-centered, less stigmatizing methods to craft plans for weight management.

Effect of a patient education program focused on weight stigma on quality of life and self-efficacy in patients living with obesity: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

After a literature review and interviews with patients living with obesity, key psychosocial determinants such as coping strategies, weight bias internalization, body dissatisfaction and self-efficacy were identified as critical to address obesity-related stigma. The intervention was tailored using evidence-based techniques and input from health professionals to ensure relevance and avoid redundancy. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the effect of an intervention specifically designed to address weight stigma among individuals living with obesity.

METHODS

The study compares two parallel arms following different interventions: Patient Education as Usual (PEU) program and the newly developed Patient Education STEREOBES (PES) program, which integrates additional components to counteract weight stigma. The PES program, crafted using the Intervention Mapping process, addresses key psychosocial determinants such as self-efficacy, body image, and coping strategies. It incorporates workshops focused on psychoeducation, physical activity, and emotional regulation through innovative techniques like mindfulness, assertiveness training, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). The program emphasizes group activities and patient interaction to foster resilience against stigmatizing experiences and promote healthier lifestyle choices. This comprehensive intervention is designed to improve psychological, behavioral, and physical outcomes, particularly by reducing the internalization of weight bias and enhancing coping mechanisms.

DISCUSSION

Patients in the PES arm should demonstrate significant improvements in quality of life and self-efficacy compared to the PEU arm. Psychosocial factors should mediate the effect of the intervention on the outcomes involving quality of life and behaviors. This study will provide valuable insights into the role of weight stigma in obesity treatment and the effectiveness of targeted interventions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This research protocol has been approved by the Individual Protection Committee Northwest IV (National n°2023-A00327-38) and registered on Clinicaltrial.gov (NCT05906238) on June 7, 2023.

The lived experiences of patients with severe obesity during hospital admissions in Norway: A phenomenological hermeneutic study

AIM

To explore the lived experiences of patients with severe obesity during hospital admissions.

DESIGN

Qualitative study design.

METHODS

Semi-structured individual interviews with 14 participants with severe obesity from Norway were conducted between May and October 2021. A qualitative phenomenological hermeneutical approach inspired by Paul Riceour was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

The following three themes were identified through the analysis of the lived experiences of patients with severe obesity during hospital admissions: blaming my weight, being prejudged and feeling different. The participants shared various emotional experiences of encounters with healthcare professionals at hospitals. They struggled to be recognized and welcomed like everyone else and found it difficult to be judged by someone who did not know them. The various experiences resulted in a vicious circle, ultimately leading to a fear of future hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Being a patient with obesity in a hospital setting can present various challenges, leading to feelings of shame and guilt. Experiences of stigma may not necessarily be related to the overall hospital context but rather to encounters with healthcare professionals who may be unfamiliar with the patient's history, which can lead to stigmatizing behaviours.

IMPACT

Understanding how patients with severe obesity experience their hospital admissions and the importance of familiarizing themselves with the individual patients to avoid stigmatizing behaviours is important for healthcare professionals caring for obese patients.

REPORTING METHOD

Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

IMPACT STATEMENT

Patients with obesity often encounter stigmatization and negative attitudes from healthcare professionals, particularly in primary care settings. Patients with severe obesity experienced various challenging encounters with healthcare professionals during hospital admissions, resulting in a vicious circle, ultimately leading to a fear of future hospitalization. It is crucial for healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients with obesity to acquaint themselves with individual patients to prevent stigmatizing behaviours.

Experiences in healthcare for weight management - a qualitative interview study of retired individuals with obesity and low or high education

BACKGROUND

Overweight and obesity are global health concerns, especially significant for older adults at higher risk for chronic diseases. The transition to retirement, altering daily routines, highlights the need for adequate weight management support. Since obesity is a challenging topic in healthcare and socioeconomic inequalities exist in access and utilization, we examined how retired individuals with obesity and low or high education describe their experiences of unmet needs, mismatches, and successes within the healthcare service system for weight management.

METHODS

This qualitative interview study is part of the Helsinki Health Study. The participants (N = 20, with a body mass index of at least 30 kg/m2) were selected from a cohort of retired former employees of the City of Helsinki. Half of the interviewees had low education, and the other half had high education. Women and men were equally represented. The interviews were conducted in 2023 and the data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three main themes were formed: Deficiencies in engaged care, Services are mismatched with needs, and Facilitating conditions for individual successes. The first main theme had two sub-themes: Condescending attitude and Ignoring weight during the appointment. The second main theme had one sub-theme: Inadequate personnel resources. The third main theme had one sub-theme: Individual opportunities to acquire information and treatment. Educational differences were most clearly reflected in the sub-themes. Participants with low education more often described experiencing a condescending attitude towards them when seeking care and had had difficulties in obtaining time for appointments due to inadequate resources. Participants with high education described broader experiences related to individual opportunities to acquire information and treatment within the healthcare service system than participants with low education.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants in this study highlighted the importance of respectful engagement with the subject of their weight and felt that these kinds of interaction skills should still be developed in healthcare personnel. The participants articulated a need for approaches that are tailored to their unique circumstances. According to the participants, long-term group intervention, provided with peer support and supported by a multidisciplinary team, could sustain their weight management.

Patient Perceptions of Weight Stigma Experiences in Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Weight stigma is the social devaluation and denigration of individuals because of their excess body weight, resulting in poorer physical and mental health and healthcare avoidance. Attribution Theory and Goffman's theory of spoiled identity provided a general overarching framework for understanding weight stigma experiences.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to explore weight stigma experiences from a broad range of perspectives emphasizing identities typically excluded in the weight stigma literature.

DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative descriptive study with data drawn from 73 substantive narrative comments from participants who responded to a larger survey.

RESULTS

Analysis developed five themes: Working on weight, Not being overweight, Lack of help and empathy, Exposure and embarrassment and Positive experiences. Individuals who would be clinically assessed as overweight, especially men, often did not identify with having a weight problem and found the framing of personal responsibility for weight empowering. Participants with larger body sizes more often attributed embarrassment and shame about weight to treatment in the clinical setting. Older participants were more likely to have positive experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest ongoing tension between the framing of weight as a personal responsibility as opposed to a multifactorial condition with many uncontrollable aspects. Gender, age and body size shaped respondent perspectives, with some young male respondents finding empowerment through perceived personal control of weight. The healthcare system perpetuates weight stigma through lack of adequate equipment and excessively weight-centric medical counselling. Recommending a healthy lifestyle to patients without support or personalized medical assessment may perpetuate weight stigma and associated detrimental health outcomes.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patients with obesity and overweight were integral to this study, providing comments for our qualitative analyses.

Patient perspectives on personalised medicine for obesity: An IMI2 SOPHIA Study

OBJECTIVE

Personalised medicine is seen as an exciting opportunity to improve the health outcomes of people with obesity. As research on phenotyping and personalised treatment for obesity rapidly advances, this study sought to understand patient preferences and perspectives on personalised medicine for obesity.

METHODS

A participatory world café methodology was used to garner the perspectives of people living with obesity on the potential opportunities and limitations associated with a personalised approach to obesity risk identification and treatment. Data were recorded by participants on tablemats and analysed thematically using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Patients expressed the hope that personalised medicine for obesity would reduce stigma, support understanding of obesity as a disease, and improve treatment outcomes and acceptance. They also expressed concern about the accuracy of personalised medicine for obesity, its implications for insurance and that further advances in individual, personalised medicine, would detract attention from social, environmental, economic and psychological drivers of obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights how patients are generally very optimistic about the potential for personalised obesity medicine but also raise a number of legitimate concerns that will be of interest to clinicians, industry, and policy makers.

Comparisons of Explicit Weight Bias Across Common Clinical Specialties of US Resident Physicians

BACKGROUND

Patients with high body weight are persistently stigmatized in medical settings, with studies demonstrating that providers endorse negative stereotypes of, and have lower regard for, higher-weight patients. Very little is known about how this weight bias varies across specialties.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine how explicit weight bias varies between resident providers among sixteen of the largest residency specialties in the USA. The identification of these differences will guide the prioritization and targeting of interventions.

DESIGN

The current study utilized cross-sectional, observational data.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-nine allopathic medical schools were recruited to participate in this national, longitudinal study. The current study utilized data from 3267 trainees in Year 2 of Residency among those who specialized in one of the most common sixteen residency programs in 2016.

MAIN MEASURES

Participants reported demographic information and residency specialties and completed three sets of measures pertaining to explicit weight bias.

KEY RESULTS

A significant minority (13-48%) of residents reported slight-to-strong agreement with each anti-fat statement. There was a significant relationship between residency specialty and anti-fat blame (F(15, 3189 = 12.87, p < .001), η2 = .06), anti-fat dislike (F(15, 3189 = 7.01, p < .001), η2 = .03), and attitudes towards obese patients (F(15, 3208 = 17.78, p < .001), η2 = .08). Primary care residents (e.g., family medicine, pediatrics) consistently reported lower levels of weight bias than those in specialty programs (e.g., orthopedic surgery, anesthesiology).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to report on weight bias in a large, heterogeneous sample of US resident physicians. Problematic levels of weight bias were found in all specialties, with residents in specialty programs generally reporting more bias than those in primary care residencies. Future research should examine which factors contribute to these differences to guide intervention.

Patients' experience of accessing healthcare for obesity in Peninsular Malaysia: a qualitative descriptive study

OBJECTIVE

To explore patients' experiences accessing healthcare for obesity and their perceived behaviour changes following the care.

DESIGN

Using a descriptive qualitative research approach informed by Levesque's framework of access to healthcare, we conducted phone interviews in the Malaysian language, which were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed inductively using a reflexive thematic analysis approach.

SETTING

Primary care clinics in five states in Peninsular Malaysia.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with obesity receiving face-to-face care for obesity from healthcare providers in Peninsular Malaysia.

RESULTS

We interviewed 22 participants aged 24-62, with the majority being female (77%), Malay (95%), married (73%) and with tertiary education (82%). Most participants attended obesity management services at public primary care clinics. We identified five themes: (1) moving from perceiving the need to seeking obesity care is a non-linear process for patients, (2) providers' words can inspire patients to change, (3) patients' needs and preferences are not adequately addressed in current obesity care, (4) over-focusing on weight by patients and healthcare providers can lead to self-blame and loss of hope for patients and (5) obesity healthcare can have consequences beyond weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Patients lack the self-regulatory skills to continue their lifestyle changes and struggle with self-blame and hopelessness. Over-focusing on weight by patients and obesity healthcare increase patients' self-stigmatisation. While provider-initiated weight discussions and engaging and personalised consultation provide the initial step towards weight management, obesity healthcare could be enhanced by behavioural support and patient education on the complexity of obesity. Further considerations could be given to shifting from a weight-centric to a more holistic health-centred approach in obesity healthcare.

Weight stigma experienced by patients with obesity in healthcare settings: A qualitative evidence synthesis

Weight stigma research is largely focused on quantifiable outcomes with inadequate representation of the perspectives of those that are affected by it. This study offers a comprehensive systematic review and synthesis of weight stigma experienced in healthcare settings, from the perspective of patients living with obesity. A total of 1340 studies was screened, of which 32 were included in the final synthesis. Thematic synthesis generated three overarching analytical themes: (1) verbal and non-verbal communication of stigma, (2) weight stigma impacts the provision of care, and (3) weight stigma and systemic barriers to healthcare. The first theme relates to the communication of weight stigma perceived by patients within patient-provider interactions. The second theme describes the patients' perceptions of how weight stigma impacts upon care provision. The third theme highlighted the perceived systemic barriers faced by patients when negotiating the healthcare system. Patient suggestions to reduce weight stigma in healthcare settings are also presented. Weight stigma experienced within interpersonal interactions migrates to the provision of care, mediates gaining equitable access to services, and perpetuates a poor systemic infrastructure to support the needs of patients with obesity. A non-collaborative approach to practice and treatment renders patients feeling they have no control over their own healthcare requirements.

Integrating person-centred care and social justice: a model for practice with larger-bodied patients

Person-centred care (PCC) has been touted as a promising paradigm for improving patients' experiences and outcomes, and the overall therapeutic environment for a range of health conditions, including obesity. While this approach represents an important shift away from a paternalistic and disease-focused paradigm, we argue that PCC must be explicitly informed by a social justice lens to achieve optimal conditions for health and well-being. We suggest that existing studies on PCC for obesity only go so far in achieving social justice goals as they operate within a biomedical model that by default pathologises excess weight and predetermines patients' goals as weight loss and/or management, regardless of patients' embodied experiences and desires. There remains a dearth of empirical research on what social justice-informed PCC looks like in practice with larger patients. This interview study fills a research gap by exploring the perspectives of 1) health practitioners (n=22) who take a critical, social justice-informed approach to weight and 2) larger patients (n=20) served by such practitioners. The research question that informed this paper was: What are the characteristics of social justice-informed PCC that play out in clinical interactions between healthcare practitioners and larger-bodied patients? We identified five themes, namely: 1) Integrating evidence-based practice with compassionate, narrative-based care; 2) Adopting a curious attitude about the patient's world; 3) Centring patients' own wisdom and expertise about their conditions; 4) Working within the constraints of the system to advocate for patients to receive equitable care; 5) Collaborating across professions and with community services to address the multifaceted nature of patient health. The findings illustrate that despite participants' diverse perspectives around weight and health, they shared a commitment to PCC by upholding patient self-determination and addressing weight stigma alongside other systemic factors that affect patient health outcomes.

"You Don't Look Anorexic": Atypical anorexia patient experiences of weight stigma in medical care

Eating disorders (ED) and weight stigma pose significant healthcare challenges. Patients at higher weights, like some with atypical anorexia (AAN), may face increased challenges due to weight stigma. This study analyzed patients' lived experiences with weight stigma in healthcare. Thirty-eight adult patients with AAN completed in-depth, semi-structured interviews regarding healthcare experiences. Guided by narrative inquiry approaches, transcripts were thematically coded. Across the illness trajectory (ED development, pre-treatment, treatment, post-treatment), patients reported that weight stigma in healthcare contributed to initiation and persistence of ED behaviors. Themes included "providers pathologizing patient weight," which patients reported triggered ED behaviors and relapse, "provider minimization and denial" of patients' EDs, which contributed to delays in screening and care, and "overt forms of weight discrimination," leading to healthcare avoidance. Participants reported that weight stigma prolonged ED behaviors, delayed care, created suboptimal treatment environments, deterred help-seeking, and lowered healthcare utilization. This suggests that many providers (pediatricians, primary care providers, ED treatment specialists, other healthcare specialists) may inadvertently reinforce patients' EDs. Increasing training, screening for EDs across the weight spectrum, and targeting health behavior promotion rather than universal weight loss, could enhance quality of care and improve healthcare engagement for patients with EDs, particularly those at higher weights.

An investigation of the prejudice and stigmatization levels of nursing students towards obese individuals

AIM

The study was conducted to determine the prejudice and stigmatization levels of nursing students towards obese individuals.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This descriptive and correlational study was conducted in Turkey in 2021 with 233 students in the nursing department of a state university. The data were collected using the Information Form, GAMS-27 Obesity Prejudice Scale, and the Stigma Scale. Independent sample t-test, One-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

The findings suggest that the students are prone to prejudice and their tendency to stigmatize is high. It was found that the difference between the student's year of study and obesity prejudices, and between family types and stigmatization levels was significant. It was determined that the stigmatization levels of the students were a determining factor on the obesity prejudice levels and there was a weak positive correlation between them.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing students are prone to showing prejudice towards obese individuals and their stigmatization levels are high. In this respect, it is recommended that prejudice and stigmatization issues regarding obesity should be included in the nursing curriculum before students start their professional life.

Rural engagement in primary care for optimizing weight reduction (REPOWER): A mixed methods study of patient perceptions

OBJECTIVE

To report on patients' satisfaction and experience of care across three different modes of weight loss counseling.

METHODS

1407 patients with obesity in the rural Midwest were enrolled to a 2-year weight management trial through their primary care practice and assigned to one of three treatment conditions: in-clinic individual, in-clinic group, phone group counseling. Patients completed surveys assessing seven domains of satisfaction and experience of care at 6 and 24-months. Post-treatment interviews were conducted to add context to survey responses.

RESULTS

1295 (92.0%) and 1230 (87.4%) completed surveys at 6 and 24-months, respectively. Patients in phone group counseling reported lower satisfaction than patients who received in-clinic group or in-clinic individual counseling across all domains at 6-months and five out of seven domains at 24-months. Interviews revealed that patients were more satisfied when they received face-to-face counseling and had meaningful interactions with their primary care provider (PCP) about their weight.

CONCLUSION

Rural patients with obesity have higher satisfaction and experience of care when weight loss counseling is delivered in a face-to-face environment and when their PCP is involved with their treatment.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Primary care practices looking to offer weight loss treatment should consider incorporating some level of face-to-face treatment plans that involves meaningful interaction with the PCP.

To which non-physician health professionals do French general practitioners refer their patients to and what factors are associated with these referrals? Secondary analysis of the French national cross-sectional ECOGEN study

Background

Multiprofessional practice is a key component in primary care. Examining general practitioner (GP) referral frequency to non-physician health professionals (NPHP) can provide information about how primary care is organised and works which is useful for policymakers. Our study aimed to describe French GP referral frequency to various NPHPs in France and identify associated factors.

Methods

This is an ancillary study to the observational, cross-sectional (ECOGEN) study conducted in 2011/2012 in France among 128 GPs. Data about consultations using the standardised International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2), and patient and GP characteristics were collected from 20,613 GP consultations. Referrals were identified through inductive and deductive approaches using ICPC-2 codes, keywords, and deep, open manual searches. Referral frequency was described overall and per NPHP. Patient, GP, and consultation-related factors associated with referral rates were described for the three most frequently identified NPHPs. To minimise potential sources of bias, this observational study followed the STROBE guidelines.

Results

French GPs referred 6.8% of patients to NPHPs, with physiotherapists, podiatrists, and nurses accounting for 85.2% of referrals. Older patients, retired patients, multiple health problems managed, and longer consultation durations were found to be associated with higher referral rates (p < 0.001). Specific trends were observed for nurse, physiotherapist, and podiatrist referrals. Women (p < 0.001) and regular patients (p = 0.002) were more likely to receive physiotherapy referrals while people with no professional activity were less likely (p < 0.001). Female GPs and those working in urban practices were more likely to issue a physiotherapy referral (p < 0.001), while GPs working in rural practices (p < 0.001) and those with higher annual consultation numbers (p = 0.002) were more likely to refer to a nurse. Working in multiprofessional centres appeared to have little impact on referral rates, being only slightly associated with podiatrist referrals (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Referral frequency is more associated with patient characteristics and clinical situations than GP-related factors suggesting patients needing referral most are most often referred. Furthermore, the three NPHPs that GPs refer to the most are those for which a referral is required for reimbursement in France, suggesting that health system legislation and NPHP reimbursement are strong determinants for referrals.

The lived experience of patients with obesity: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis

Although the deleterious effects of obesity have been well documented in terms of morbidity and mortality, less is known about what it is like to live with this complex and chronic disease. This study systematically reviewed and synthesized peer-reviewed studies relating to the lived experience of patients with obesity. A total of 12,388 records were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 32 final studies. Meta-ethnographic synthesis of these 32 studies generated five "third-order constructs" or themes: the development of obesity; a life limited; stigma, judgment, shame, and blame; treatment and; experiences of specific or minority groups. These constructs describe, from the patient's perspective, the factors associated with the development and maintenance of obesity; the effects of the disease on their day-to-day lives; the impact of the stigma and judgment many patients are subjected to; and their experience of accessing, or trying to access, treatment for their healthcare needs. This synthesis reveals the dearth of studies that focus solely on the experience of the patient and highlights the tendency for participant-informed, rather than participatory, methods in obesity research. It concludes with a call for further participatory research into the experiences of people living with obesity.

A qualitative exploration of obesity bias and stigma in Irish healthcare; the patients' voice

BACKGROUND

Current data indicates 70% of adults with obesity report experiencing bias and stigmatisation when engaging with healthcare. Most studies to date, have focused on weight bias from a healthcare professional's perspective. Few have explored weight bias from the perspective of the individual living with obesity and no study has conducted this research in the Irish context.

AIMS

This study explored, the lived-in experience of individuals afflicted with obesity, when interacting with the Irish healthcare system. It examined whether participants encountered weight bias and stigma, if so, how it may have impacted them and gathered their suggestions on how it could be best addressed.

METHODS

Employing a phenomenological approach, purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 individuals living with class II (BMI 35.0-39.9) or III obesity (BMI ≥40kg/m2) who reported regular and consistent engagement with the Irish healthcare system. Predominant emergent themes were categorised using the interview domains; (1) experiences of obesity bias and stigma, (2) impact of this bias and stigma and (3) suggested avenues to reduce bias and stigma.

FINDINGS

Participants reported experiencing high levels of weight bias and stigmatisation. Relating to experiences, three themes were identified; interpersonal communication, focus of care and physical environment. In terms of its impact, there were two emergent themes; negativity towards future healthcare and escalation of unhealthy behaviours. Suggested avenues to eliminate bias and stigma included the introduction of a timely and clear clinical pathway for obesity management and a focus on HCPs education in relation to obesity causes and complexity.

CONCLUSIONS

Outside of specialist obesity tertiary care, weight bias and stigmatisation is commonly reported in the Irish healthcare system. It is a significant issue for those living with obesity, detrimental to their physiological and psychological health. A concerted effort by HCPs across clinical, research and educational levels is required to alleviate its harmful effects.

Adolescent Girls With Overweight and Obesity Feel Physically Healthy and Highlight the Importance of Mental Health

INTRODUCTION

Obesity in adolescence is a significant ongoing public health problem that has not improved over the past decade.

OBJECTIVE

This descriptive qualitative study explores the perspective of female adolescents who are overweight or obese regarding their views on health and weight within the clinic setting.

METHODS

In-depth interviews were conducted with female adolescents (age 13-19 years old; BMI ≥85th percentile) from the mid-west region of the United States (N = 28). Inductive thematic analysis using Braun & Clarke's methods was utilized.

RESULTS

The findings from this study revealed that the adolescents' view of health encompasses physical, mental, and psychosocial health dimensions, and despite being overweight and obese, the participants felt healthy. Participants discussed the need to eat healthier and increase their daily physical activity, but were unable to transform this into action. Within the clinical setting, the adolescents were sensitive to weight discussions.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study can increase providers' understanding of the adolescent, increase awareness of adolescent sensitivity, and assist researchers in developing age-appropriate interventions for effective treatment and prevention of childhood obesity.

Clinical encounters about obesity: Systematic review of patients' perspectives

Guidelines recommend clinicians intervene on obesity but it is unclear how people with overweight react. In this systematic review, we searched 20 online databases for qualitative studies interviewing people with overweight or obesity who had consulted a primary care clinician. Framework synthesis was used to analyse 21 studies to produce a new theoretical understanding. Consultations in which patients discussed their weight were more infrequent than patients would have liked, which some perceived was because they were unworthy of medical time; others that it indicated doctors feel being overweight is not a serious risk. Patients reported that doctors offered banal advice assuming that the patient ate unhealthily or was not trying to address their weight. Patients reported doctors assumed that their symptoms were due to overweight without a proper history or examination, creating concern that serious illness may be missed. Patients responded positively to offers of support for weight loss and active monitoring of weight. Patients with overweight internalize weight stigma sensitizing them to clues that clinicians are judging them negatively, even if weight is not discussed. Patients' negative experiences in consultations relate to perceived snap judgements and flippant advice and negative experiences appear more salient than positive ones.

A conceptual framework for understanding iatrophobia

OBJECTIVE

Iatrophobia - fear of doctors, medical care, or the medical care system - is common among patients and can negatively impact their health-seeking behaviors and relationships with health care professionals. Despite this, academic literature on iatrophobia often fails to explore its nuanced causes.

METHODS

We establish a conceptual framework of iatrophobia, categorizing sources of fear that may create barriers to accessing medical care, and recommend a research agenda to address this phenomenon and understand its role in medical care.

RESULTS

The framework includes three categories of determinants of iatrophobia: patient fear of illness and the medical exam, patient fear of physician reaction, and patient fear related to barriers to care. These categories represent influences from individual to more system-related factors associated with the physician-patient relationship. Research examining iatrophobia should focus on understanding its prevalence, how patients cope with their fear, discussing iatrophobia in the physician-patient encounter, the sociopolitical contribution to iatrophobia, and how iatrophobia can be reduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrophobia can be categorized into three primary domains, but it remains poorly understood.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A more thorough understanding of iatrophobia will help to contextualize its role amid other barriers to care and patient health outcomes.

Weight bias and health care utilization: a scoping review

AIM

The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the evidence on how perceptions and/or experiences of weight bias in primary health care influence engagement with and utilization of health care services by individuals with obesity.

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have found discrepancies in the use of health care services by individuals living with obesity; a greater body mass index has been associated with decreased health care utilization, and weight bias has been identified as a major barrier to engagement with health services.

METHODS

PubMed was searched from January 2000 to July 2017. Four reviewers independently selected 21 studies examining perceptions of weight bias and its impact on engagement with primary health care services.

FINDINGS

A thematic analysis was conducted on the 21 studies that were included in this scoping review. The following 10 themes were identified: contemptuous, patronizing, and disrespectful treatment, lack of training, ambivalence, attribution of all health issues to excess weight, assumptions about weight gain, barriers to health care utilization, expectation of differential health care treatment, low trust and poor communication, avoidance or delay of health services, and 'doctor shopping'. Overall, our scoping review reveals how perceptions and/or experiences of weight bias from primary care health professionals negatively influence patient engagement with primary health care services.

Too big to be seen: Weight-based discrimination among nursing students

An educational intervention was conducted to determine the efficacy of an obesity sensitivity program to determine nursing students' attitudes toward obese clients. As part of the clinical curriculum, nursing students (N = 103) received weekly obesity sensitivity education on weight-based discrimination. Students' completed a preproject and postproject attitudes toward obese persons scale (Barra, 2015) to evaluate discriminatory beliefs and actions. All clinical groups had a significant positive change in their own weight prejudices postobesity education intervention. Chi-square analysis was utilized as a measure of association between pre- and postobesity education with clinical application concerning obesity size, body odor, appearance, and lifestyle, along with provider fear of a back injury. Promoting nursing student awareness of obese client bias can dissipate negative stigmas to promote a therapeutic patient-provider relationship.

A Qualitative Exploration of Weight Bias and Quality of Health Care Among Health Care Professionals Using Hypothetical Patient Scenarios

The purpose of this study was to determine whether weight bias exhibited by health care professionals (HCPs) impacts quality of health care provided to individuals with obesity. HCPs (n = 220; 88% female, 87% nurses) in the Midwest region of the United States were recruited to complete an online survey. In this within-subjects study design, participants completed the Attitudes Towards Obese Persons (ATOP) scale to assess weight bias and responded to 2 (1 person with obesity and 1 person without obesity) hypothetical patient scenarios to evaluate quality of care. A median split was calculated for ATOP scores to divide participants into high or low weight bias groups. Within these groups, thematic analysis was used to uncover themes in quality of care based on participants' responses to each scenario. The analysis revealed that HCPs in the high weight bias group gave specific diet and exercise recommendations, offered health advice regarding weight loss, and used less teaching discourse when responding to the patient with obesity. In addition, in both weight bias groups, patients with obesity were started on pharmaceutical therapies sooner. The findings of this study suggest a need to educate HCPs on the importance of empathy and compassion when providing treatment to all patients, regardless of weight, to increase quality of care and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Physicians' views and experiences of discussing weight management within routine clinical consultations: A thematic synthesis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically search and synthesise qualitative studies of physicians' views and experiences of discussing weight management within a routine consultation.

METHODS

A systematic search of four electronic databases identified 11,169 articles of which 16 studies met inclusion criteria. Quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool and a thematic synthesis conducted of extracted data.

RESULTS

Four analytical themes were found: (1) physicians' pessimism about patients' weight loss success (2) physicians' feel hopeless and frustrated (3) the dual nature of the physician-patient relationship (4) who should take responsibility for weight management.

CONCLUSION

Despite clinical recommendations barriers remain during consultations between physicians and patients about weight management. Many of these barriers are potentially modifiable.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Improving training, providing clearer guidelines and placing a greater emphasis on collaboration within and between clinicians will help reduce barriers for both physicians and patients. In particular, there is an urgent need for more specialised training for physicians about weight management to promote knowledge and skills in behaviour change techniques and ways to broach sensitive topics without damaging patient relationships.

Stigma in Practice: Barriers to Health for Fat Women

In this paper, we explore barriers to health for fat people. By shifting the focus from what fat people do or do not do, neoliberal principles are replaced by a focus instead on structural and institutional policies, attitudes, and practices. This includes the impact of stigma on the health treatment and health-seeking behavior of fat people. For example, we consider the role that provider anti-fat attitudes and confirmation bias play in the failure to provide evidenced-based healthcare to fat patients. This is an autoethnographic paper, which provides the opportunity to read research from the perspective of fat scholars, framed by questions such as: can fat people have health? Is health itself a state of being, a set of behaviors, a commodity, a performance; perhaps the new social contract? As a co-written autoethnographic paper, one aspect of the evidence provided is the recorded experiences of the two fat authors. This includes writing from notes, journals, compiled and repeated experiences with medical professionals, family, and the community. Framed by feminist standpoint and supported by literature drawn from Fat Studies, Public Health, Obesity Research, and other interdisciplinary fields, this is a valuable opportunity to present an extended account of fat discrimination and the impact of the stigma fat people face through the medical profession and other sectors of the community, written by fat individuals. The paper concludes by considering the health pathways available to fat people. Special attention is paid to whether Bacon and Aphramor's Health at Every Size paradigm provides a path to health for fat individuals.

An ecological framework for sexual minority women's health: factors associated with greater body mass

In recent years, many studies have focused on the body of sexual minority women, particularly emphasizing their larger size. These studies rarely offer theoretically based explanations for the increased weight, nor study the potential consequences (or lack thereof) of being heavier. This article provides a brief overview of the multitude of factors that might cause or contribute to larger size of sexual minority women, using an ecological framework that elucidates upstream social determinants of health as well as individual risk factors. This model is infused with a minority stress model, which hypothesizes excess strain resulting from the stigma associated with oppressed minority identities such as woman, lesbian, bisexual, woman of color, and others. We argue that lack of attention to the upstream social determinants of health may result in individual-level victim blaming and interventions that do not address the root causes of minority stress or increased weight.

Patients who feel judged about their weight have lower trust in their primary care providers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether overweight and obese patients have less trust in their primary care providers (PCPs) if they feel judged about their weight by these PCPs.

METHODS

We conducted a national internet-based survey of 600 adults engaged in primary care with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) in 2012. Our dependent variable was high patient trust in their PCP (score ≥ 8/10). Our independent variable was "feeling judged about my weight by my PCP" dichotomized as "often/sometimes" versus "never." We conducted a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for patient and PCP factors using survey weights.

RESULTS

Overall, 21% felt that their PCP judged them about their weight. Respondents who perceived judgment were significantly less likely to report high trust in their PCP [OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.98].

CONCLUSION

While only a fifth of overweight and obese patients perceived weight-related judgment from their PCPs, these patients were significantly less likely to report high trust in these providers. Given patients' decreased trust in providers who convey weight-related judgment, our results raise concerns about potential effects on the doctor-patient relationship and patient outcomes.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Addressing provider stigma toward patients with obesity could help build trust in these patient-provider relationships and improve quality of care.