Using Patient-Provided Information to Refine Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Criteria Among Women Presenting in the Emergency Department

Differences in Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis by Ambulatory Care Setting

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most commonly reported sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the US and timely, correct treatment can reduce CT transmission and sequelae. Emergency departments (ED) are an important location for diagnosing STIs. This study compared recommended treatment of CT in EDs to treatment in physician offices. Five years of data (2006-2010) were analyzed from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NHAMCS), including the Outpatient survey (NHAMCS-OPD) and Emergency Department survey (NHAMCS-ED). All visits with a CT diagnosis and those with a diagnosis of unspecified venereal disease were selected for analysis. Differences in receipt of recommended treatments were compared between visits to physician offices and emergency departments using Chi square tests and logistic regression models. During the 5 year period, approximately 3.2 million ambulatory care visits had diagnosed CT or an unspecified venereal disease. A greater proportion of visits to EDs received the recommended treatment for CT compared to visits to physician offices (66.1 vs. 44.9 %, p < .01). When controlling for patients' age, sex and race/ethnicity, those presenting to the ED with CT were more likely to receive the recommended antibiotic treatment than patients presenting to a physician's office (OR 2.16; 95 % CI 1.04-4.48). This effect was attenuated when further controlling for patients' expected source of payment. These analyses demonstrate differences in the treatment of CT by ambulatory care setting as well as opportunities for increasing use of recommended treatments for diagnosed cases of this important STI.

Treatment of Cases of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Emergency Department Patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of patients treated appropriately, both presumptively in the emergency department (ED), and at follow-up, among those patients who ultimately tested positive for either Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) or Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). Secondary aims were to characterize patients who received appropriate presumptive antibiotic treatment of both NG and CT at the time of ED visit and to compare them to patients who did not receive appropriate presumptive therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 500 patients randomly chosen from those that had positive NG or CT test results performed in the ED between January 10 and June 11. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2010 STD Treatment Guidelines were used to determine appropriate antibiotics.

RESULTS

We found 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49%-58%) of patients received appropriate antibiotics at ED visit and an additional 31% (95% CI, 27%-35%) were treated at our medical center on follow-up. Fifteen percent did not have documented treatment. Providers presumptively treated 46% (95% CI, 42%-50%) of patients studied with antibiotics appropriate for both NG and CT. The presence of behavioral risk factors and, for males, the presence of genital symptoms were the only factors independently associated with presumptive ED treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients diagnosed as having NG or CT in this ED, a portion were not documented to ever receive appropriate antibiotics, although a call-back system is in place. Presumptive treatment was not commonly used in this ED but may be necessary given the high number of patients who never got treated.

Prevalence of 3 sexually transmitted infections in a pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrheae, and Trichomonas vaginalis and to describe factors associated with sexually transmitted infection (STI) in a pediatric emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Adolescents aged 14 to 19 years presenting to a Midwestern pediatric ED were asked to provide urine for STI testing and complete a survey about previous sexual activity (PSA), high-risk behaviors, demographics, and visit reason (reproductive: genitourinary complaints, abdominal pain, or a female with vomiting). Comparisons between subgroups were analyzed using Χ test.

RESULTS

Among 200 subjects (64% of approached), mean age was 15.6 years; 63% were female. Eleven subjects (6%; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-8.7) tested positive for 1 or more STIs: 10 for C. trachomatis (one denied PSA), 3 for T. vaginalis (all coinfected with C. trachomatis), and 1 for N. gonorrheae. Half reported PSA; of these, 71% reported 1 or more high-risk behaviors, most commonly first sex before the age of 15 years (51%) and no condom at last sex (42%). Among those with PSA and nonreproductive visit (n = 73), 11.0% had 1 or more STIs (95% confidence interval, 3.4-18.1). Two factors were associated with greater likelihood of positive STI test result, namely, reporting PSA versus no PSA (10% vs 1%, P = 0.005) and last sex within 1 month or less versus more than 1 month (20% vs 0%, P = 0.001). In this sample, none of the following characteristics were associated with STI: insurance, race, high-risk behaviors, age, or ED visit reason.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 10 sexually active adolescent ED patients without reproductive complaints had 1 or more STIs. This suggests the need for strategies to increase STI testing for this population.

Sexual history taking in the emergency department - more specificity required

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the most reported diseases in the United States, and emergency departments (ED) serve a population presenting with increased infection risk. However, identifying patients for whom sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening is appropriate requires accurate sexual history reporting.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine the consistency with which ED patients answer general and specific sexual activity questions, and how responses relate to perceived STI risk.

METHODS

Urban ED patients aged 15-34 years completed a sexual history survey containing sexual activity and perceived infection risk questions and provided urine and pharyngeal specimens for CT/GC analysis.

RESULTS

Participants included 192 males and 301 females with a mean age of 25.2 years and were 65.7% white and 33.3% black. Thirty-eight (7.7%) were infected with CT or GC. In patients denying sexual activity in the past year (general question), 40.7% of such males and 45.0% of females also reported some form of specific sexual activity (activity misclassification). Among self-identified heterosexuals, 7.2% males and 7.5% females reported some form of homosexual activity (orientation misclassification; OM). OM individuals were more likely to perceive themselves at risk of infection both orally (odds ratio 2.92, confidence interval 1.12-7.63) and genitally (odds ratio 3.36, confidence interval 1.55-7.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Given that reported sexual activity and age are the only criteria for routine female screening, and that homosexual activity is one of the few screening criteria for males, our results show that a substantial proportion of ED patients eligible for screening may not be identified by reliance upon general sexual history questions.