Expression of programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PD-L2) is a distinguishing feature of primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma and associated with PDCD1LG2 copy gain

Primary mediastinal large B-cell Lymphoma: Biological features, clinical characteristics and current treatment strategies

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a distinct subtype of B-cell lymphoma, representing a clinical and therapeutic challenge due to its unique presentation, histopathological features, and treatment response. It primarily affects young adults, with a significant female preponderance, and is characterized by a large anterior mediastinal mass that causes compressive symptoms. Despite its aggressive nature, PMBCL patients have a favorable prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate exceeding 80% when early remission is achieved through first-line therapy. Drawing on the significant scientific therapeutic advances over recent years, this review focuses on the evolving treatment strategies for PMBCL patients. Anthracycline- and rituximab-containing regimens are the mainstays of first-line approaches, often followed by mediastinal radiation therapy. However, concerns regarding long-term toxicities have led to a reevaluation of treatment protocols, suggesting that radiotherapy can be safely omitted in patients who achieve a complete metabolic response after induction therapy, according to a PET-guided approach. Furthermore, new targeted therapies such as PD-1 inhibitors and CAR-T cell immunotherapy, have shown promising results in refractory or relapsed PMBCL.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma from the clinic to genomics: Insights for pathologists

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a mature aggressive B-cell lymphoma that arises in the anterior mediastinum, likely originating from thymic B cells. Initially considered a subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, PMBL has since been established as a distinct clinicopathologic entity due to its unique clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic and genetic characteristics. PMBL primarily affects young adults, especially women, and manifests as a bulky mediastinal mass that can invade adjacent structures, often causing respiratory symptoms. The genomic landscape of PMBL includes alterations in the JAK-STAT, NF-κB signaling pathways, and immune evasion mechanisms. This review explores the clinical presentation, pathogenesis and genetic landscape of PMBL, highlighting its morphologic and immunophenotypic characteristics and differences from related mediastinal lymphomas such as classic Hodgkin lymphoma and mediastinal grey zone lymphoma. We also discuss the implications of these findings on diagnosis, management and personalized treatment approaches.

A Prognostic Riskscore Model Related to Helicobacter pylori Infection in Stomach Adenocarcinoma

Background: Helicobacter pylori (HP) is associated with the development of various stomach diseases, one of the major risk factors for stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD). Methods: The HP infection score between tumor and normal groups was compared by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). The key modules related to HP infection were identified by weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA), and functional enrichment analysis was conducted on these module genes. Further, the limma package was used to screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between HP-positive and HP-negative STAD. The prognostic genes were obtained to construct the riskscore model, and the performance of the model was validated. The correlation between riskscore and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) was analyzed by Spearman's method. The single-cell atlas of HP-positive STAD was delineated. The mRNA expression levels of the prognostic genes were verified using STAD cells, and the migration and invasion capacities of STAD cells were evaluated by using the wound healing assay and transwell assay. Results: The HP infection score in the tumor group was significantly higher than that in the normal group. The purple and royal blue modules showed higher correlation with HP infection in STAD, and these module genes were enriched in the immune-related pathway. Further, five prognostic genes (CTLA4, CPVL, EMB, CXCR4, and FAM241A) were screened from the HP infection-related DEGs, which were utilized for establishing the riskscore model, with good robustness. Riskscore exhibited strong correlation with TIME in STAD. Single-cell atlas of HP-positive STAD revealed that CXCR4 is highly expressed in Epithelial Cell 1, Epithelial Cell 2, and parietal cells of the tumor group. CPVL, EMB, CTLA4, FAM241A, and CXCR4 showed high expression in STAD cells, and the silencing of CPVL could suppress the migration and invasion of STAD cells. Conclusion: This study established a riskscore model based on HP infection-related genes, which could provide reference for prognostic prediction and treatment targets of STAD.

Dedicated diagnostic approaches for mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas occurring in children, adolescents, and young adults

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) represents the fourth most common malignant disease among children and adolescents. Current disease classifications, including the most recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC), rely on a combination of clinical, epidemiological, histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular data to define discrete clinicopathologic entities. There is growing evidence that children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA) with B-cell NHL display unique clinical and epidemiologic characteristics. This may be explained by distinct age-related developmental plasticity, immune and haematopoietic repertoires, environmental exposures and social determinants of health, and germline or acquired genetic and molecular features, including those associated with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Here, we discuss the unique clinical and biological characteristics of several distinct paediatric B-cell NHL types to indicate a path forward in classification of these CAYA NHL to optimally support multidisciplinary patient care and personalized treatment. We propose a potential "arising in CAYA" classification qualifier to denote the distinct clinicopathologic characteristics of B-cell NHLs that, otherwise, histologically and immunophenotypically resemble those arising in middle-aged and older adults. We also discuss how haemopathology diagnoses are evolving to incorporate the most current scientific knowledge into future classification systems of CAYA B-cell NHL.

Pediatric lymphomas: overview and diagnostic challenges

Only 10% of new lymphoma diagnoses in the USA occur in children < 15 years. Although the same diagnostic criteria apply to both adult and pediatric lymphomas, there are important differences in some lymphoma subtypes. These differences are recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) with the recent 2022 classification of pediatric tumors including pediatric hematopoietic tumors. Here, we review the WHO classification scheme for pediatric lymphomas and summarize the diagnostic criteria, recent genetic findings, and differences from their adult counterparts for some subtypes including those yet to be included as a definitive subtype. In general, there are differences in relatively frequency, genetic mutation, and prognosis with the pediatric counterpart often having better prognosis. Emerging B-cell lymphomas with recurrent gene alterations such as IRF4 rearrangement and 11q gain/loss chromosomal alterations will be reviewed. The overlapping pathological, clinical, and molecular features between pediatric-type follicular lymphoma (PTFL) and pediatric nodal marginal zone lymphoma (PNMZL) suggesting one disease with broad morphological spectrum will be discussed. The pathogenetic role of EBV in subclassifying Burkitt lymphoma is highlighted. The revised classification of the EBV-positive lymphoproliferative disorders in children is discussed. This review will focus on novel findings, areas of special interest, and diagnostic challenges in pediatric lymphomas.

Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy for solid tumors with CD274 (PD-L1 gene) amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling: retrospective study based on a nationwide database

BACKGROUND

Amplification of the programmed cell death-ligand 1 gene (CD274) is highly prevalent and associated with a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lymphomas, and is also a potential biomarker for ICI treatment of solid tumors. However, the efficacy of ICIs for solid tumors with CD274 amplification identified by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has been unclear. We here examined ICI efficacy for solid tumors with CD274 amplification identified by CGP in a national database.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database containing 60,155 CGP test results for individuals with solid tumors. Only clinical data from patients treated with ICIs alone (not those undergoing concomitant therapy with molecularly targeted or cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents) were evaluated. We matched 48 patients in the CD274 amplification-positive group with 170 patients in the CD274 amplification-negative group in a 1:4 ratio based on tumor type, histology, treatment, and age. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and response rate were evaluated as treatment outcomes in the two groups.

RESULTS

OS was similar in the CD274-amplified and matched CD274-non-amplified groups (median of 22.1 vs 26.3 months, respectively; HR of 0.92 with a 95% CI of 0.55 to 1.54; p=0.075). TTNT tended to be longer in the CD274-amplified group than in the matched CD274-non-amplified group (median of 16.5 vs 14.0 months; HR of 0.63 with a 95% CI of 0.37 to 1.08; p=0.091). The objective response rate was 33.3% and 18.4% (difference of 14.9%, with a 95% CI of -0.2% to 31.6%), and the disease control rate was 63.9% and 41.1% (difference of 22.8%, with a 95% CI of 5.1% to 40.4%), in the CD274-amplified and matched CD274-non-amplified groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients with solid tumors positive for CD274 amplification in this analysis is the largest to date, and our results suggest that such gene amplification may be associated with the outcome of ICI treatment in such individuals. CD274 amplification identified by CGP may therefore be a predictor of ICI efficacy for solid tumors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000029779.

Circulating tumor DNA assisting lymphoma genetic feature profiling and identification

INTRODUCTION

Lymphoma tissue biopsies cannot fully capture genetic features due to accessibility and heterogeneity. We aimed to assess the applicability of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for genomic profiling and disease surveillance in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

Tumor tissue and/or liquid biopsies of 49 cHLs, 32 PMBCLs, and 74 DLBCLs were subject to next-generation sequencing targeting 475 genes. The concordance of genetic aberrations in ctDNA and paired tissues was investigated, followed by elevating ctDNA-based mutational landscapes and the correlation between ctDNA dynamics and radiological response/progression.

RESULTS

ctDNA exhibited high concordance with tissue samples in cHL (78%), PMBCL (84%), and DLBCL (78%). In cHL, more unique mutations were detected in ctDNA than in tissue biopsies (P < 0.01), with higher variant allele frequencies (P < 0.01). Distinct genomic features in cHL, PMBCL, and DLBCL, including STAT6, SOCS1, BTG2, and PIM1 alterations, could be captured by ctDNA alone. Prevalent PD-L1/PD-L2 amplifications were associated with more concomitant alterations in PMBCL (P < 0.01). Moreover, ctDNA fluctuation could reflect treatment responses and indicate relapse before imaging diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoma genomic profiling by ctDNA was concordant with that by tumor tissues. ctDNA might also be applied in lymphoma surveillance.

Novel Targets and Advanced Therapies in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphomas

Since the introduction of rituximab in the late 1990s, significant progress has been made in advancing targeted therapies for B cell lymphomas, improving patients' chance of being cured and clinicians' therapeutic armamentarium. A better understanding of disease biology and pathogenic pathways, coupled with refinements in immunophenotypic and molecular diagnostics, have been instrumental in these achievements. While traditional chemotherapy remains fundamental in most cases, concerns surrounding chemorefractoriness and cumulative toxicities, particularly the depletion of the hemopoietic reserve, underscore the imperative for personalized treatment approaches. Integrating targeted agents, notably monoclonal antibodies, alongside chemotherapy has yielded heightened response rates and prolonged survival. A notable paradigm shift is underway with innovative-targeted therapies replacing cytotoxic drugs, challenging conventional salvage strategies like stem cell transplantation. This review examines the landscape of emerging targets for lymphoma cells and explores innovative therapies for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). From Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cells to more potent monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, and small molecules targeting intracellular pathways, each modality offers promising avenues for therapeutic advancement. This review aims to furnish insights into their potential implications for the future of DLBCL treatment strategies.

Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression in Lymphomas: State of the Art

The interaction of programmed death-1 (PD-1) on T lymphocytes with its ligands Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Programmed Death Ligand 2 (PD-L2) on tumor cells and/or tumor-associated macrophages results in inhibitory signals to the T-cell receptor pathway, consequently causing tumor immune escape. PD-L1/PD-L2 are currently used as predictive tissue biomarkers in clinical practice. Virtually PD-L1 levels expressed by tumor cells are associated with a good response to immune checkpoint blockade therapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. These therapies restore T-cell antitumor immune response by releasing T-lymphocytes from the inhibitory effects of tumor cells. Immune checkpoint therapies have completely changed the management of patients with solid cancers. This therapeutic strategy is less used in hematological malignancies, although good results have been achieved in some settings, such as refractory/relapsed classic Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma. Variable results have been obtained in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and T-cell lymphomas. Immunohistochemistry represents the main technique for assessing PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. This review aims to describe the current knowledge of PD-L1 expression in various types of lymphomas, focusing on the principal mechanisms underlying PD-L1 overexpression, its prognostic significance and practical issues concerning the evaluation of PD-L1 immunohistochemical results in lymphomas.

Pembrolizumab With R-CHOP in Previously Untreated DLBCL: Sustained, High Efficacy, and Safety With Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

While generally ineffective in relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may hold greater promise in untreated, immunocompetent patients. We previously reported safety and early efficacy of pembrolizumab plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (PR-CHOP) in a phase I trial of untreated DLBCL, noting responses in 90% of patients (complete response 77%) and a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 83%. We herein report long-term safety and efficacy at 5-year follow up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with untreated DLBCL or grade 3b follicular lymphoma, intended to receive 6 cycles of R-CHOP were eligible. Patients (N = 30) were treated with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV and R-CHOP in 21-day cycles for 6 cycles.

RESULTS

At median follow up of 4.8 years, 5-year PFS was 71% (CI, 54%-94%) and 5-year overall survival was 83% (CI, 71%-98%). Immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) occurred in 7 (23%) patients (10% grade 3/4). Three IRAEs (rash, thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis) occurred beyond 3 months of treatment completion. PD-L1 tumor expression was documented in 19 of 23 (83%) tested patients. None of the 19 patients who had any PD-L1 expression have relapsed, whereas 2 out of the 4 patients with no PD-L1 expression have relapsed.

CONCLUSION

PR-CHOP has led to durable responses in most patients, with the best outcomes in PD-L1-expressing disease. Furthermore, the safety profile was manageable, with no consistent pattern of late events. These data support ongoing strategies incorporating ICIs in frontline DLBCL therapy and confirmation of predictive biomarkers including tumor PD-L1 expression.

High PDL1/PDL2 gene expression correlates with worse outcome in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is an uncommon entity of aggressive B-cell lymphoma with an unusually good prognosis, except for 10-15% of chemotherapy-refractory cases. To identify earlier these higher risk patients, we performed molecular characterization of a retrospective multicenter cohort of patients treated with firstline immunochemotherapy. The traits of the patients with gene-expression profiling data (n = 120) were as follows: median age of 34 years (range, 18-67 years); female sex, 58.3%; elevated lactate dehydrogenase, 82.5%; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 1, 85.7%; Ann Arbor stage I/II, 55%; International Prognostic Index score of 1 to 2, 64.4%; and median metabolic tumor volume, 290.4 cm3 (range, 15.7-1147.5 cm3). Among all 137 markers tested for correlation with survival data, only programmed death-ligand (PDL) 1 and PDL2 expression showed a prognostic impact. Overall, both PDL1 and PDL2 genes were highly expressed in 37 patients (30.8%; PDL1high/PDL2high). The baseline clinical characteristics of patients with PDL1high/PDL2high were similar to those of other patients. In univariate analysis, PDL1high/PDL2high status was associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 4.292) and overall survival (OS; HR, 8.24). In multivariate analysis, PDL1high/PDL2high status was an independent prognostic factor of adverse outcomes (PFS: HR, 5.22; OS: HR, 10.368). We validated these results in an independent cohort of 40 patients and confirmed the significant association between PDL1high/PDL2high status and inferior PFS (HR, 6.11). High PDL1/PDL2 gene expression defines a population with strong immune privilege and poorer outcomes from standard chemotherapy who might benefit from firstline checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Mediastinal large B cell lymphoma and surrounding gray areas: a report of the lymphoma workshop of the 20th meeting of the European Association for Haematopathology

Session 3 of the 2021 European Association for Haematopathology/Society for Hematopathology Workshop focused on mediastinal large B cell lymphomas and surrounding gray areas. One half of the session was dedicated to primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBL) and included cases with classic clinicopathologic features, as well as cases with either morphologic or immunophenotypic variation, and PMBL-like cases with primary extramediastinal disease. The role of additional immunophenotyping and/or molecular testing to aid in the diagnosis of PMBL was discussed. The second half of the session focused on mediastinal and non-mediastinal gray zone lymphomas (GZL) with features intermediate between diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL). Several cases illustrating the current challenges in separating this entity from PMBL/DLBCL and CHL were presented. There was discussion regarding the clinical and genetic differences between mediastinal and non-mediastinal GZLs. Rare cases of PMBL and GZL associated with EBV or follicular lymphoma were reviewed. Finally, several cases included in the session highlighted composite or sequential CHL and PMBL/DLBCL and/or GZL, highlighting challenges in separating such cases from GZL.

Clinical PD-1/PD-L1 Blockades in Combination Therapies for Lymphomas

Immunotherapy with the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) blockade has revolutionized the treatment of advanced solid cancers. However, these clinical benefits have been limited to cases of malignant lymphomas, showing promising results for only classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). To bring clinical benefits to more patients with lymphoma, numerous combination therapies involving PD-1/PD-L1 blockade have been tested in clinical trials in both frontline and relapsed/refractory settings. This article reviews the current landscape of combination therapies with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade for lymphoma and discusses the potential therapeutic approaches. An interim analysis of a phase 3 study demonstrated increased progression-free survival with nivolumab combination therapy over the current frontline treatment in patients with advanced-stage cHL. The results of combination therapies for aggressive B-cell lymphomas, except for PMBCL, have been disappointing. Several clinical trials of combined PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors are exploring its efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter transformation. Several T-cell lymphoma subtypes respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade monotherapy. Further clinical trials are underway to investigate appropriate combination regimens with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, especially for cHL, CLL with Richter transformation, and T-cell lymphoma, in both frontline and relapsed/refractory settings.

Pembrolizumab in relapsed or refractory primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: final analysis of KEYNOTE-170

Previous analyses of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-170 (NCT02576990) study demonstrated effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety of pembrolizumab 200 mg given every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (∼2 years) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) whose disease progressed after or who were ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. The end points included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR) according to the investigator per 2007 Response Criteria; overall survival (OS); and safety. In this final analysis, median duration of follow-up was 48.7 months (range, 41.2-56.2). The ORR was 41.5% (complete response, 20.8%; partial response, 20.8%). The median DOR was not reached; no patients who achieved a complete response progressed at the data cutoff. The median PFS was 4.3 months; the 4-year PFS rate was 33.0%. The median OS was 22.3 months; the 4-year OS rate was 45.3%. At the data cutoff, 30 patients (56.6%) had any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs); the most common were neutropenia, asthenia, and hypothyroidism. Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 22.6% of the patients; no grade 5 AEs occurred. After 4 years of follow-up, pembrolizumab continued to provide durable responses, with promising trends for long-term survival and acceptable safety in R/R PMBCL.

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Biomarkers of Response in Lymphoma: A Narrative Review

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized the prognosis of several advanced-stage solid tumors. However, its success has been far more limited in hematological malignancies and is mostly restricted to classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL). In patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), response to PD-1/PD-L1 ICB monotherapy has been relatively limited, although some subtypes are more sensitive than others. Numerous predictive biomarkers have been investigated in solid malignancies, such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI), among others. This review aims to appraise the current knowledge on PD-1/PD-L1 ICB efficacy in lymphoma when used either as monotherapy or combined with other agents, and describes potential biomarkers of response in this specific setting.

Assessment of Response to Immunotherapy in Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma: Towards Quantifying Changes in Tumor Burden Using FDG-PET/CT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently the standard of care for many advanced solid tumors, and they have been recently approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma. Assessments of the response to immunotherapy may be complicated by the occurrence of the flare/pseudoprogression phenomenon, consisting of initial tumor enlargement and even the appearance of new lesions, followed by a response, which may initially be indistinguishable from true progression. There have been efforts to characterize and capture the new patterns of response observed during immunotherapy, namely, pseudoprogression and delayed response, and several immune-related response criteria have been proposed. Confirming progression on a subsequent scan and measuring the total tumor burden are both common in immune-related criteria. Due to the peculiarity of hematologic malignancies, lymphoma-specific immune-related criteria have been developed (LYRIC), and they have been evaluated in research studies in comparison to the Lugano Classification. In this review work, we illustrate the evolution of the response criteria in lymphomas from the first CT-based criteria to the development of the PET-based Lugano Classification, further refined to take into account the flare phenomenon encountered during immunotherapy. We also describe the additional contribution of PET-derived volumetric parameters to the interpretation of responses during immunotherapy.

Novel strategies for cancer immunotherapy: counter-immunoediting therapy

The advent of immunotherapy has made an indelible mark on the field of cancer therapy, especially the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice. Although immunotherapy has proven its efficacy and safety in some tumors, many patients still have innate or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. The emergence of this phenomenon is closely related to the highly heterogeneous immune microenvironment formed by tumor cells after undergoing cancer immunoediting. The process of cancer immunoediting refers to the cooperative interaction between tumor cells and the immune system that involves three phases: elimination, equilibrium, and escape. During these phases, conflicting interactions between the immune system and tumor cells result in the formation of a complex immune microenvironment, which contributes to the acquisition of different levels of immunotherapy resistance in tumor cells. In this review, we summarize the characteristics of different phases of cancer immunoediting and the corresponding therapeutic tools, and we propose normalized therapeutic strategies based on immunophenotyping. The process of cancer immunoediting is retrograded through targeted interventions in different phases of cancer immunoediting, making immunotherapy in the context of precision therapy the most promising therapy to cure cancer.

Large B-Cell Lymphomas in the 5th Edition of the WHO-Classification of Haematolymphoid Neoplasms-Updated Classification and New Concepts

The family/class of the large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of haematolymphoid tumors (WHO-HAEM5) features only a few major changes as compared to the 4th edition. In most entities, there are only subtle changes, many of them only representing some minor modifications in diagnostic terms. Major changes have been made in the diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL)/high-grade B-cell lymphomas (HGBL) associated with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements. This category now consists of MYC and BCL2 rearranged cases exclusively, while the MYC/BCL6 double hit lymphomas now constitute genetic subtypes of DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS) or of HGBL, NOS. Other major changes are the conceptual merger of lymphomas arising in immune-privileged sites and the description of LBCL arising in the setting of immune dysregulation/deficiency. In addition, novel findings concerning underlying biological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of the different entities are provided.

Expression of PD1 and PDL1 as immune-checkpoint inhibitors in mantle cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has remained incurable in most patients. The expression of PD-L1 as a prognostic and predictive marker has not been fully evaluated in MCL. The current study aimed to determine PD-1/PD-L1 expression in MCL specimens and its significance as an immune check point inhibitor.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of 79 confirmed MCL patients based on immunohistochemistry (IHC). The IHC method was used to stain patient samples for PD1 and PDL1. Positive PD-1/PD-L1 expression was defined as moderate to strong or memberanous or memberanous/cytoplasmic staining in at least 5% of tumor and/or 20% of associated immune cells. Tumor aggressiveness was determined based on Ki67 and variant.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 60.08 ± 10.78 years old. Majority of the patients were male. The prevalence of aggressive tumor was 25%. Positive PD1 and PDL1 expression were identified in 12 (15.0%) and 3 (3.8%) of tumor cells, respectively. PD1 and PDL1 were positive in zero (0%) and 7 (8.9%) of background cells, respectively. There was no significant difference in terms of study parameters between positive and negative groups for both PD1 and PDL1 proteins. PD1 tumor cell percentage was negatively correlated with age (r = -0.254, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that neither PD-1 nor its ligands represent relevant targets for MCL treatment. Age may impact the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors and could be related to the increased incidence of MCL with age.

PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway: A Therapeutic Target in CD30+ Large Cell Lymphomas

The programmed death-ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, reside on tumor cells and can bind with programmed death-1 protein (PD-1) on T-cells, resulting in tumor immune escape. PD-1 ligands are highly expressed in some CD30+ large cell lymphomas, including classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBL), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (EBV+ DLBCL), and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). The genetic alteration of the chromosome 9p24.1 locus, the location of PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 are the main mechanisms leading to PD-L1 and PD-L2 overexpression and are frequently observed in these CD30+ large cell lymphomas. The JAK/STAT pathway is also commonly constitutively activated in these lymphomas, further contributing to the upregulated expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2. Other mechanisms underlying the overexpression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in some cases include EBV infection and the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. These cellular and molecular mechanisms provide a scientific rationale for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in treating patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease and, possibly, in newly diagnosed patients. Given the high efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with R/R CHL and PMBL, these agents have become a standard treatment in these patient subgroups. Preliminary studies of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with R/R EBV+ DLBCL and R/R ALCL have also shown promising results. Future directions for these patients will likely include PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in combination with other therapeutic agents, such as brentuximab or traditional chemotherapy regimens.

Atlas of PD-L1 for Pathologists: Indications, Scores, Diagnostic Platforms and Reporting Systems

BACKGROUND

Innovative drugs targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis have opened promising scenarios in modern cancer therapy. Plenty of assays and scoring systems have been developed for the evaluation of PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression, so far considered the most reliable therapeutic predictive marker.

METHODS

By gathering the opinion of acknowledged experts in dedicated fields of pathology, we sought to update the currently available evidence on PD-L1 assessment in various types of tumors.

RESULTS

Robust data were progressively collected for several anatomic districts and leading international agencies to approve specific protocols: among these, TPS with 22C3, SP142 and SP263 clones in lung cancer; IC with SP142 antibody in breast, lung and urothelial tumors; and CPS with 22C3/SP263 assays in head and neck and urothelial carcinomas. On the other hand, for other malignancies, such as gastroenteric neoplasms, immunotherapy has been only recently introduced, often for particular histotypes, so specific guidelines are still lacking.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 immunohistochemical scoring is currently the basis for allowing many cancer patients to receive properly targeted therapies. While protocols supported by proven data are already available for many tumors, dedicated studies and clinical trials focusing on harmonization of the topic in other still only partially explored fields are surely yet advisable.

A single-cell atlas of diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is one of the most common yet aggressive types of B cell lymphoma and remains incurable in 40% of patients. Herein, we profile the transcriptomes of 94,324 cells from 17 DLBCLs and 3 control samples using single-cell RNA sequencing. Altogether, 73 gene expression programs are identified in malignant cells, demonstrating high intra- and intertumor heterogeneity. Furthermore, 2,754 pairs of suggestive cell-cell interactions are predicted, indicating a complex and highly dynamic tumor microenvironment. Especially for B cell lymphomas, a strong costimulatory CD70-CD27 interaction is predicted between malignant and T cells. Furthermore, coinhibitory signals mediated by TIM3 or TIGIT seem to be the main driving force for T cell exhaustion. Finally, we find that chronic hepatitis B virus infection may have a significant impact on tumor cell survival and immune evasion in DLBCL. Our results provide insights into B cell lymphomagenesis and may facilitate the design of targeted immunotherapy strategies.

Immune checkpoint inhibition for the treatment of cancers: An update and critical review of ongoing clinical trials

Advances in Cancer immunotherapy in the past few years include the development of medications that modulate immune checkpoint proteins. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) are three co-inhibitory receptors that are expressed in the tumor microenvironment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) that target these biomarkers unleash the properties of effector T cells that are licensed to kill cancer cells. Immune checkpoint blockade has dramatically changed the treatment landscape of many cancers. In this Review, we describe the current data regarding clinical trials of ICIs in six important cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), renal cell cancer (RCC), hodgkin lymphoma (HL), non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and head and neck cancer carcinoma (HNSCC).

Current and emerging treatment options in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma

Previously considered a subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is now recognized by the World Health Organization as an independent entity. PMBCL has clinicopathologic features that are separate from systemic DLBCL and harbors some biologic characteristics which overlap with nodular sclerosing classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL). Similar to cHL, copy number alterations of 9p24.1 are frequently seen in PMBCL, which leads to increased expression of key genes in the region, including programmed death-ligand 1( PD-L1), PD-L2, and JAK2. In addition, PMBCL cells express CD30 in a mostly patchy fashion. In the upfront setting, dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (i.e., DA-EPOCH-R) is the only regimen that has been shown in a prospective setting to result in outstanding outcomes without consolidative radiation to the mediastinum, with a 5-year event-free survival rate of 93% and overall survival rate of 97%. Thus, in recent years, DA-EPOCH-R has been recognized as the preferred frontline regimen. Despite the encouraging results in the frontline setting, the outcomes in the relapsed/refractory setting remain poor. The current approach of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation, as used in patients with DLBCL, does not result in high rates of cure in patients with rrPMBCL. In recent years, the characteristic molecular features identified in PMBCL have provided more treatment opportunities for this patient population. In the relapsed setting, single-agent PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab have demonstrated high and durable remission rates. Despite the expression of CD30, the CD30 antibody drug-conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) as a single agent has been deemed inactive in this disease. On the contrary, the combinations of BV and PD-1 inhibitor have shown higher response rates than PD-1 inhibitor alone. Moreover, anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy has been positioned as another successful strategy for patients with rrPMBCL. Axicabtagene ciloleucel and lisocabtagene maraleucel are two products used in rrPMBCL.

Diagnostic utility of programmed cell death ligand 1 (clone SP142) immunohistochemistry for malignant lymphoma and lymphoproliferative disorders: A brief review

The programmed cell death 1 (PD1)/PD1 ligand (PD-L1) axis plays an important role in tumor cell escape from immune control and has been most extensively investigated for therapeutic purposes. However, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is still not used widely for diagnosis. We review the diagnostic utility of PD-L1 (by clone SP142) immunohistochemistry in large-cell lymphomas, mainly consisting of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Neoplastic PD-L1 (nPD-L1) expression on Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells is well-established among prototypic CHL. Of note, EBV+ CHL often poses a challenge for differential diagnosis from peripheral T-cell lymphoma with EBV+ non-malignant large B-cells; their distinction is based on the lack of PD-L1 expression on large B-cells in the latter. The nPD-L1 expression further provides a good diagnostic consensus for CHL with primary extranodal disease conceivably characterized by a combined pathogenesis of immune escape of tumor cells and immunodeficiency. Compared with CHL, the nPD-L1 expression rate is much lower in DLBCL, highlighting some specific subgroups of intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, and EBV+ DLBCL. They consist of nPD-L1-positive and -negative subgroups, but their clinicopathological significance remains to be elucidated. Microenvironmental PD-L1 positivity on immune cells may be associated with a favorable prognosis in extranodal DLBCL. PD-L1 (by SP142) immunohistochemistry has helped us to understand the immune biology of lymphoid neoplasms possibly related by immune escape and/or immunodeficiency. However, knowledge of these issues remains limited and should be clarified for diagnostic consensus in the future.

Primary mediastinal Large B-cell Lymphoma

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a separate entity in the WHO classification based on clinico-pathologic features and a distinct molecular signature which overlaps with nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma (NScHL). Molecular classifiers can distinguish PMBCL from diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) using RNA derived from paraffin-embedded tissue and are integral to future studies. However, given that ~5% of DLBCL can have a 'molecular' PMBCL phenotype in the absence of mediastinal involvement, clinical information will remain critical for diagnosis. Studies over the last 10-20 years have elucidated the biologic hallmarks of PMBCL which are reminiscent of cHL, including the importance of JAK-STAT and NFKB signaling pathways as well as an immune evasion phenotype through multiple converging genetic aberrations. The outcome of PMBCL has improved in the modern rituximab era, however controversies remain whether there is a single standard treatment for all patients and when to integrate radiotherapy. Regardless of the frontline therapy, refractory disease can occur in up to 10% of patients and correlates with poor outcome. With emerging data supporting high efficacy of PD1 inhibitors in PMBCL, studies are underway integrating them into the up-front setting.

Mediastinal Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Lymphoproliferative disorders comprise 50% to 60% of all mediastinal malignancies in both children and adults. Primary mediastinal involvement is rare (∼5%), whereas secondary mediastinal involvement by systemic disease is more common (10% to 25%). Primary mediastinal disease is defined as involvement by a lymphoproliferative disorder of mediastinal lymph nodes, the thymus, and/or extranodal mediastinal organs without evidence of systemic disease at presentation. In this review, the clinical, radiologic, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of some of the most characteristic mediastinal lymphoproliferative disorders are presented. The entities discussed here include: classic Hodgkin lymphoma with emphasis on nodular sclerosis and mixed cellularity types, and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including primary mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma, mediastinal gray zone lymphoma, mediastinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, thymic marginal zone lymphoma, mediastinal plasmacytoma, T-lymphoblastic lymphoma, and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Although not a malignant process, hyaline vascular Castleman disease is also discussed here as this disorder commonly involves the mediastinum. Despite multiple advances in hematopathology in recent decades, the day-to-day diagnosis of these lesions still requires a morphologic approach and a proper selection of immunohistochemical markers. For this reason, it is crucial for general pathologists to be familiar with these entities and their particular clinicoradiologic presentation.

Testicular Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma-Clinical, Molecular, and Immunological Features

Simple Summary

Testicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (T-DLBCL) is a rare and aggressive lymphoma entity that mainly affects elderly men. It has a high relapse rate with especially the relapses of the central nervous system associating with dismal outcome. T-DLBCL has a unique biology with distinct genetic characteristics and clinical presentation, and the increasing knowledge on the tumor microenvironment of T-DLBCL highlights the significance of the host immunity and immune escape in this rare lymphoma, presenting in an immune-privileged site of the testis. This review provides an update on the latest progress made in T-DLBCL research and summarizes the clinical perspectives in T-DLBCL.

Abstract

Primary testicular lymphoma is a rare lymphoma entity, yet it is the most common testicular malignancy among elderly men. The majority of the cases represent non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with aggressive clinical behavior and a relatively high relapse rate. Due to the rareness of the disease, no randomized clinical trials have been conducted and the currently recognized standard of care is based on retrospective analyses and few phase II trials. During recent years, the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor-related immunity have been the focus of many tumor biology studies, and the emergence of targeted therapies and checkpoint inhibitors has significantly modulated the field of cancer therapies. Testicular DLBCL (T-DLBCL) is presented in an immune-privileged site of the testis, and the roles of NF-κB pathway signaling, 9p24.1 aberrations, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, especially immune checkpoint expressing lymphocytes and macrophages, seem to be unique compared to other lymphoma entities. Preliminary data on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of T-DLBCL are promising and more studies are ongoing.

PD-1 and LAG-3 Checkpoint Blockade: Potential Avenues for Therapy in B-Cell Lymphoma

The dependence of cancer on an immunotolerant tumor microenvironment (TME) is well established. Immunotherapies that overcome tumor-induced immune suppression have been central to recent advancements in oncology. This is highlighted by the success of agents that interrupt PD-1 mediated immune suppression in a range of cancers. However, while PD-1 blockade has been paradigm-shifting in many malignancies, the majority of cancers show high rates of primary resistance to this approach. This has led to a rapid expansion in therapeutic targeting of other immune checkpoint molecules to provide combination immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), with one such promising approach is blockade of Lymphocyte Activation Gene 3 (LAG-3). Clinically, lymphoproliferative disorders show a wide spectrum of responses to ICB. Specific subtypes including classical Hodgkin lymphoma have demonstrated striking efficacy with anti-PD-1 therapy. Conversely, early trials of ICB have been relatively disappointing in common subtypes of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this review, we describe the TME of common lymphoma subtypes with an emphasis on the role of prominent immune checkpoint molecules PD-1 and LAG3. We will also discuss current clinical evidence for ICB in lymphoma and highlight key areas for further investigation where synergistic dual checkpoint blockade of LAG-3 and PD-1 could be used to overcome ICB resistance.

Immunity reloaded: Deconstruction of the PD-1 axis in B cell lymphomas

Over the past decade therapies targeting the PD-1 axis with monoclonal antibodies to reinstate host immune function have revolutionized the clinical management of some cancers but have had minimal impact on others. This dichotomy is exemplified by B cell lymphomas. Whilst striking results are observed in classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) and Primary Mediastinal B Cell Lymphoma (PMBL), responses in other B cell lymphomas are infrequent. Even with cHL and PMBL, responses are not always durable and adverse effects can result in treatment discontinuation. A more nuanced approach to manipulate the PD-1 axis is required before the full benefits of PD-1 axis blockade can be realised. In this review, we provide an outline of PD-1 axis biology, including the range of cellular expression, the molecular mechanisms underlying regulation and the impacts of downstream signalling. These may permit the development of alternate strategies to PD-1 axis blockade to enhance the therapeutic efficacy in B cell lymphomas.

Engaging the Innate and Adaptive Antitumor Immune Response in Lymphoma

Immunotherapy has emerged as a powerful therapeutic strategy for many malignancies, including lymphoma. As in solid tumors, early clinical trials have revealed that immunotherapy is not equally efficacious across all lymphoma subtypes. For example, immune checkpoint inhibition has a higher overall response rate and leads to more durable outcomes in Hodgkin lymphomas compared to non-Hodgkin lymphomas. These observations, combined with a growing understanding of tumor biology, have implicated the tumor microenvironment as a major determinant of treatment response and prognosis. Interactions between lymphoma cells and their microenvironment facilitate several mechanisms that impair the antitumor immune response, including loss of major histocompatibility complexes, expression of immunosuppressive ligands, secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, and the recruitment, expansion, and skewing of suppressive cell populations. Accordingly, treatments to overcome these barriers are being rapidly developed and translated into clinical trials. This review will discuss the mechanisms of immune evasion, current avenues for optimizing the antitumor immune response, clinical successes and failures of lymphoma immunotherapy, and outstanding hurdles that remain to be addressed.

Spatial signatures identify immune escape via PD-1 as a defining feature of T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma

T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (TCRLBCL) is an aggressive variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) characterized by rare malignant B cells within a robust but ineffective immune cell infiltrate. The mechanistic basis of immune escape in TCRLBCL is poorly defined and not targeted therapeutically. We performed a genetic and quantitative spatial analysis of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in a multi-institutional cohort of TCRLBCLs and found that malignant B cells harbored PD-L1/PD-L2 copy gain or amplification in 64% of cases, which was associated with increased PD-L1 expression (P = .0111). By directed and unsupervised spatial analyses of multiparametric cell phenotypic data within the tumor microenvironment, we found that TCRLBCL is characterized by tumor-immune "neighborhoods" in which malignant B cells are surrounded by exceptionally high numbers of PD-L1-expressing TAMs and PD-1+ T cells. Furthermore, unbiased clustering of spatially resolved immune signatures distinguished TCRLBCL from related subtypes of B-cell lymphoma, including classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and DLBCL-NOS. Finally, we observed clinical responses to PD-1 blockade in 3 of 5 patients with relapsed/refractory TCRLBCL who were enrolled in clinical trials for refractory hematologic malignancies (NCT03316573; NCT01953692), including 2 complete responses and 1 partial response. Taken together, these data implicate PD-1 signaling as an immune escape pathway in TCRLBCL and also support the potential utility of spatially resolved immune signatures to aid the diagnostic classification and immunotherapeutic prioritization of diverse tumor types.

PD-1 and PD-L2 expression predict relapse risk and poor survival in patients with stage III colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune responses have long been an area of interest in cancer research. In this study, the effects of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L2) on the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) were investigated.

METHODS

Primary tumour specimens of stage III CRC patients operated between 2002 and 2013 were assessed for PD-1 and PD-L2 expression and various clinicopathological and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

We observed a significant relationship between poor prognostic factors and PD-1/PD-L2 expression. These biomarkers were also found to serve as independent risk factors for LIR and MSI. In univariate analysis, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were found to be poor in PD-1 and PD-L2 positive patients. In multivariate analysis, these biomarkers were found to serve as independent poor prognostic factors for RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that PD-1 and PD-L2 may serve as independent prognostic survival parameters for CRC patients and may be employed for the design of targeted therapies.

Predicting Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lymphoma: Are We Up to the Standards of Solid Tumors?

Treatment of cancer has transformed with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. However, the majority of solid tumor patients do not respond to checkpoint blockade. In contrast, the response rate to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is 65% to 84% which is the highest among all cancers. Currently, checkpoint inhibitors are only approved for cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma as the responses to single-agent checkpoint blockade in other hematologic malignancies is disappointingly low. Various established biomarkers such as programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein surface expression, mismatch repair (MMR) status, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are routinely used in clinical decision-making in solid tumors. In this review, we will explore these biomarkers in the context of hematologic malignancies. We review characteristic 9p24.1 structural alteration in cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) as a basis for response to PD-1 inhibition, as well as the role of antigen presentation pathways. We also explore the reported frequencies of MMR deficiency in various hematologic malignancies and investigate TMB as a predictive marker.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in B-Cell Lymphoma

Simple Summary

Immune-based treatment strategies, which include immune checkpoint inhibition, have recently become a new frontier for the treatment of B-cell-derived lymphoma. Whereas checkpoint inhibition has given oncologists and patients hope in specific lymphoma subtypes like Hodgkin lymphoma, other entities do not benefit from such promising agents. Understanding the factors that determine the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibition in different lymphoma subtypes can lead to improved therapeutic strategies, including combinations with various chemotherapies, biologics and/or different immunologic agents with manageable safety profiles.

Abstract

For years, immunotherapy has been considered a viable and attractive treatment option for patients with cancer. Among the immunotherapy arsenal, the targeting of intratumoral immune cells by immune-checkpoint inhibitory agents has recently revolutionised the treatment of several subtypes of tumours. These approaches, aimed at restoring an effective antitumour immunity, rapidly reached the market thanks to the simultaneous identification of inhibitory signals that dampen an effective antitumor response in a large variety of neoplastic cells and the clinical development of monoclonal antibodies targeting checkpoint receptors. Leading therapies in solid tumours are mainly focused on the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathways. These approaches have found a promising testing ground in both Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, mainly because, in these diseases, the malignant cells interact with the immune system and commonly provide signals that regulate immune function. Although several trials have already demonstrated evidence of therapeutic activity with some checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma, many of the immunologic lessons learned from solid tumours may not directly translate to lymphoid malignancies. In this sense, the mechanisms of effective antitumor responses are different between the different lymphoma subtypes, while the reasons for this substantial difference remain partially unknown. This review will discuss the current advances of immune-checkpoint blockade therapies in B-cell lymphoma and build a projection of how the field may evolve in the near future. In particular, we will analyse the current strategies being evaluated both preclinically and clinically, with the aim of fostering the use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in lymphoma, including combination approaches with chemotherapeutics, biological agents and/or different immunologic therapies.

PD-1/PD-L1 Pathway and Its Blockade in Patients with Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin Large-Cell Lymphomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) is currently the most extensively studied inhibitory checkpoint molecule. Many malignant neoplasms express the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1, and/or PD-L2, which bind to PD-1 on T cells and induce T cell "exhaustion." By doing so, the malignant cells escape from an antitumor immune response (immune evasion). Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway releases T cells from the inhibitory effects exerted by tumor cells and restores a T cell-mediated antitumor immune response. Here, we focus on understanding the immune biology of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in large-cell lymphomas, including classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL), and the current status of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in treating patients with these lymphomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and PD-1 inhibitors have been widely tested in patients with a variety of lymphomas. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating patients with some types of relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphomas. The highest response rate has been achieved in patients with CHL, due to a high frequency of genetic alterations of 9p24.1 and high expression of PD-1 ligands. The frequency of alterations of chromosome 9p24.1 and expression of PD-L1/PD-L1 in DLBCL (except some specific subtypes) is low; therefore, it is not recommended to treat unselected DLBCL patients with PD-1 inhibitors. Studies have shown a high frequency of PD-L1 expression in ALCL, especially in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+ type. Several cases reports have described a dramatic and durable response to PD-1 blockade in patients with R/R ALCL, suggesting that patients with R/R ALCL may be potential candidates for PD-1 blockade immunotherapy. Understanding the immune biology of lymphoid neoplasms has helped us identify the specific lymphoma types that are vulnerable to PD-1 inhibitors, such as CHL, and specific subtypes of DLBCL. However, our knowledge of many other lymphomas, including ALCL, in this area is still very limited and the future of PD-1 inhibitors in treating those lymphomas remains unclear.

Microenvironment Remodeling and Subsequent Clinical Implications in Diffuse Large B-Cell Histologic Variant of Richter Syndrome

Introduction

Richter Syndrome (RS) is defined as the development of an aggressive lymphoma in the context of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), with a Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) histology in 95% cases. RS genomic landscape shares only a few features with de novo DLBCLs and is marked by a wide spectrum of cytogenetic abnormalities. Little is known about RS microenvironment. Therapeutic options and efficacy are limited, leading to a 12 months median overall survival. The new targeted treatments usually effective in CLL fail to obtain long-term remissions in RS.

Methods

We reviewed available PubMed literature about RS genomics, PD-1/PD-L1 (Programmed Death 1/Programmed Death Ligand 1) pathway triggering and subsequent new therapeutic options.

Results

Data from about 207 patients from four landmark papers were compiled to build an overview of RS genomic lesions and point mutations. A number of these abnormalities may be involved in tumor microenvironment reshaping. T lymphocyte exhaustion through PD-L1 overexpression by tumor cells and subsequent PD-1/PD-L1 pathway triggering is frequently reported in solid cancers. This immune checkpoint inhibitor is also described in B lymphoid malignancies, particularly CLL: PD-1 expression is reported in a subset of prolymphocytes from the CLL lymph node proliferation centers. However, there is only few data about PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in RS. In RS, PD-1 expression is a hallmark of recently described « Regulatory B-cells », which interact with tumor microenvironment by producing inhibiting cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10, impairing T lymphocytes anti-tumoral function. Based upon the discovery of high PD-1 expression on tumoral B lymphocyte from RS, immune checkpoint blockade therapies such as anti-PD-1 antibodies have been tested on small RS cohorts and provided heterogeneous but encouraging results.

Conclusion

RS genetic landscape and immune evasion mechanisms are being progressively unraveled. New protocols using targeted treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors as single agents or in combination with immunochemotherapy are currently being evaluated.

Current Immunotherapy Approaches in Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are lymphoid malignancies of B- or T-cell origin. Despite great advances in treatment options and significant improvement of survival parameters, a large part of NHL patients either present with a chemotherapy-refractory disease or experience lymphoma relapse. Chemotherapy-based salvage therapy of relapsed/refractory NHL is, however, capable of re-inducing long-term remissions only in a minority of patients. Immunotherapy-based approaches, including bispecific antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors and genetically engineered T-cells carrying chimeric antigen receptors, single-agent or in combination with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, chemotherapy or targeted agents demonstrated unprecedented clinical activity in heavily-pretreated patients with NHL, including chemotherapy-refractory cases with complex karyotype changes and other adverse prognostic factors. In this review, we recapitulate currently used immunotherapy modalities in NHL and discuss future perspectives of combinatorial immunotherapy strategies, including patient-tailored approaches.

Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas comprise a heterogenous group of disorders which differ in biology. Although response rates are high in some groups, relapsed disease can be difficult to treat, and newer approaches are needed for this patient population. It is increasingly apparent that the immune system plays a significant role in the propagation and survival of malignant cells. Immune checkpoint blocking agents augment cytotoxic activity of the adaptive and innate immune systems and enhance tumor cell killing. Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have been tested as both single agents and combination therapy. Although success rates with anti-PD-1 antibodies are high in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, the results are yet to be replicated in those with non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Some lymphoma histologies, such as primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBL), central nervous system, and testicular lymphomas and gray zone lymphoma, respond favorably to PD-1 blockade, but the response rates in most lymphoma subtypes are low. Other agents including those targeting the adaptive immune system such as TIM-3, TIGIT, and BTLA and innate immune system such as CD47 and KIR are therefore in trials to test alternative ways to activate the immune system. Patient selection based on tumor biology is likely to be a determining factor in treatment response in patients, and further research exploring optimal patient populations, newer targets, and combination therapy as well as identifying biomarkers is needed.

DLBCL with amplification of JAK2/PD-L2 exhibits PMBCL-like CNA pattern and worse clinical outcome resembling those with MYD88 L265P mutation

Background

Recently, copy number alteration (CNA) of 9p24.1 were demonstrated in 10% of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with gene expression and mutation profiles that were similar to those of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL). However, their CNA-based profile and clinical impact still remain unclear.

Methods

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification were employed to investigate the prevalence of JAK2/PD-L2 amplification in DLBCL and their CNA-based pattern of driver genes. The clinical outcome and characteristics were also analyzed.

Results

Using unsupervised hierarchical clustering, a small group of DLBCL (10.5%, 8/76) was clustered together with PMBCL as Cluster_2, demonstrating amplification of JAK2 (100%,8/8) and PD-L2 (75.0%,6/8). This subgroups of DLBCL demonstrated significant higher expression of PD-L1 than those with MYD88 L265P mutation(p = 0.024). And they exhibited dismal OS and PFS as compared with DLBCL_others(p = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively), which is similar to DLBCL with MYD88 L265P mutation.

Conclusions

DLBCL with amplification of JAK2/PD-L2 exhibits CNA pattern that is similar to PMBCL, and demonstrates unfavorable clinical outcome that resembles those with MYD88 L265P mutation. It is essential to identify this subgroup of DLBCL who may acquire more benefits from the JAK2 and PD-L1 signaling inhibition.

The influence of programmed cell death ligand 2 (PD-L2) expression on survival outcome and tumor microenvironment in diffuse large B cell lymphoma

The frequency and significance of programmed cell death ligand (PD-L) 2 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remain undefined. We described the expression pattern of PD-L/PD-1 in 88 DLBCL patients using immunohistochemistry. The association between PD-L expression and clinical characteristics/outcomes were analyzed. PD-L1 and PD-L2 were expressed in 14.8% and 68.2% of DLBCL patients with median positivity on tumor cells of 100% and 90%, respectively. PD-1 on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was expressed in 12.5% of patients. Interestingly, 45.5% of patients had PD-L2 expressing TILs which were significantly associated with bulky disease (p = .046) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (p = .048). PD-L1 and/or PD-L2 expression on lymphoma cells was associated with inferior progression-free survival (Hazard ratio [HR] 2.20; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.004-4.84, p = .049) and overall survival (HR 2.27; 95%CI 1.03-4.98, p = .042), using multivariate analysis. In summary, PD-L2 expression on DLBCL is common and, together with PD-L1, were related to poor outcomes.

Immune-Checkpoint Blockade Therapy in Lymphoma

Tumor cells use immune-checkpoint pathways to evade the host immune system and suppress immune cell function. These cells express programmed cell-death protein 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)/PD-L2, which bind to the programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1) present on cytotoxic T cells, trigger inhibitory signaling, and reduce cytotoxicity and T-cell exhaustion. Immune-checkpoint blockade can inhibit this signal and may serve as an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with solid tumors. Several trials have been conducted on immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with malignant lymphoma and their efficacy has been reported. For example, in Hodgkin lymphoma, immune-checkpoint blockade has resulted in response rates of 65% to 75%. However, in non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the response rate to immune-checkpoint blockade was lower. In this review, we evaluate the biology of immune-checkpoint inhibition and the current data on its efficacy in malignant lymphoma, and identify the cases in which the treatment was more effective.

Combining PD-1 Inhibitor Nivolumab with Radiotherapy Successfully Treated a Patient with Refractory Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is relatively infrequent and generally has a good prognosis with standard immunochemotherapy. However, treatment options are limited for patients with relapsed/refractory PMBCL who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation. In this report, we treated a refractory PMBCL patient, who did not respond to salvage chemotherapy, with combined nivolumab and radiotherapy. The patient achieved a complete remission with mild adverse reactions and has survived without relapse 2 years after treatment.

The Promises and Challenges of Tumor Mutation Burden as an Immunotherapy Biomarker: A Perspective from the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies have revolutionized the management of patients with NSCLC and have led to unprecedented improvements in response rates and survival in a subset of patients with this fatal disease. However, the available therapies work only for a minority of patients, are associated with substantial societal cost, and may lead to considerable immune-related adverse events. Therefore, patient selection must be optimized through the use of relevant biomarkers. Programmed death-ligand 1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry is widely used today for the selection of programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor therapy in patients with NSCLC; however, this approach lacks robust sensitivity and specificity for predicting response. Tumor mutation burden (TMB), or the number of somatic mutations derived from next-generation sequencing techniques, has been widely explored as an alternative or complementary biomarker for response to ICIs. In theory, a higher TMB increases the probability of tumor neoantigen production and therefore, the likelihood of immune recognition and tumor cell killing. Although TMB alone is a simplistic surrogate of this complex interplay, it is a quantitative variable that can be relatively readily measured using currently available sequencing techniques. A large number of clinical trials and retrospective analyses, employing both tumor and blood-based sequencing tools, have evaluated the performance of TMB as a predictive biomarker, and in many cases reveal a correlation between high TMB and ICI response rates and progression-free survival. Many challenges remain before the implementation of TMB as a biomarker in clinical practice. These include the following: (1) identification of therapies whose response is best informed by TMB status; (2) robust definition of a predictive TMB cut point; (3) acceptable sequencing panel size and design; and (4) the need for robust technical and informatic rigor to generate precise and accurate TMB measurements across different laboratories. Finally, effective prediction of response to ICI therapy will likely require integration of TMB with a host of other potential biomarkers, including tumor genomic driver alterations, tumor-immune milieu, and other features of the host immune system. This perspective piece will review the current clinical evidence for TMB as a biomarker and address the technical sequencing considerations and ongoing challenges in the use of TMB in routine practice.

Immune and Cell Therapy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

The promise of immunotherapy has shone brightly for decades in hematologic malignancies and specifically in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The last decade has witnessed the emergence of completely novel forms of immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint blockade, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells. These treatments have shown phenomenal, and in some cases possibly curative, successes in various relapsed/refractory lymphomas. This review summarizes the most notable successes and promising findings as well as some of the attendant failures. These treatments will doubtlessly transform the treatment paradigms across many lymphoma subtypes. Yet, only if we can better understand their mechanisms of action, toxicity, and resistance will be able to maximize their therapeutic benefit.

Genomic analyses of PMBL reveal new drivers and mechanisms of sensitivity to PD-1 blockade

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphomas (PMBLs) are aggressive tumors that typically present as large mediastinal masses in young women. PMBLs share clinical, transcriptional, and molecular features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), including constitutive activation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), JAK/STAT signaling, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-mediated immune evasion. The demonstrated efficacy of PD-1 blockade in relapsed/refractory PMBLs led to recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration and underscored the importance of characterizing targetable genetic vulnerabilities in this disease. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of recurrent genetic alterations -somatic mutations, somatic copy number alterations, and structural variants-in a cohort of 37 newly diagnosed PMBLs. We identified a median of 9 genetic drivers per PMBL, including known and newly identified components of the JAK/STAT and NF-κB signaling pathways and frequent B2M alterations that limit major histocompatibility complex class I expression, as in cHL. PMBL also exhibited frequent, newly identified driver mutations in ZNF217 and an additional epigenetic modifier, EZH2. The majority of these alterations were clonal, which supports their role as early drivers. In PMBL, we identified several previously uncharacterized molecular features that may increase sensitivity to PD-1 blockade, including high tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and an apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) mutational signature. The shared genetic features between PMBL and cHL provide a framework for analyzing the mechanism of action of PD-1 blockade in these related lymphoid malignancies.

Blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) in Sézary syndrome reduces Th2 phenotype of non-tumoral T lymphocytes but may enhance tumor proliferation

Sézary syndrome (SS) is an aggressive leukemic variant of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (L-CTCL) that arises from malignant clonally derived skin-homing CD4⁺ T cells. Based on advancements in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying L-CTCL, boosting the suppressed immune response emerges as a promising strategy in SS management. Immune checkpoint inhibitory molecules have already demonstrated efficacy in a wide spectrum of malignancies. Currently, agents targeting the programmed death-1 (PD-1) axis are under evaluation in L-CTCL. Here we investigated the expression of PD-1 and its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2 in blood and skin from patients with L-CTCL. We demonstrate that PD-1 expression is markedly increased on tumor T cells compared to non-tumor CD4⁺ T cells from SS patients and to CD4⁺ cells from healthy individuals. In contrast, PD-L1 shows decreased expression on tumor T cells, while PD-L2 expression is low without significant differences between these groups. Functional PD-1 blockade in vitro resulted in reduced Th2 phenotype of non-tumor T lymphocytes, but enhanced the proliferation of tumor T cells from SS patients. Our study sheds some light on the PD-1 axis in both peripheral blood and skin compartments in SS patients, which may be relevant for the treatment of L-CTCL with immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Use of CAR-T cell therapy, PD-1 blockade, and their combination for the treatment of hematological malignancies

With the successful treatment of B-cell lymphomas using rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, novel immunotherapies have developed rapidly in recent years. Immune checkpoint blockade and chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapy, which are antibody-based therapy and cell-based therapy, respectively, show promising efficacy and have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating hematological malignancies. However, considering severe side effects and short-term clinical remission, the combination of CAR-T cell therapy and programmed cell-death protein-1 (PD-1) blockade has been applied to enhance therapeutic efficacy in preclinical models and clinical trials. Herein, we review the mechanism of the two therapies, show their toxicities and clinical use respectively, address their combined application, and discuss the scope of further investigations of this mechanism-based combination therapy.