The Almost-Normal Liver Biopsy: Presentation, Clinical Associations, and Outcome

Unexplained Chronically Elevated Aminotransferases: Liver Biopsy Gives Major Information with Therapeutic Implication in One Patient Out of Seven

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver biopsy contribution in patients with unexplained elevation of transaminases is not clearly established. The aim was to study liver biopsy contribution in patients with unexplained elevated transaminases strictly defined according to the current guidelines, reflecting the present clinical practice.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, we identified all the liver biopsies performed in patients with elevated transaminases for at least six months. Patients with a particular context, or with an identified cause of liver disease were excluded. The biopsies were classified according to the 4 following injury patterns: hepatitic, biliary, steatotic, vascular.

RESULTS

87 patients were included. Liver biopsy showed minimal changes or a normal histology in 48%, a steatotic pattern in 21%, a hepatitic pattern in 13%, a vascular pattern in 8%, a biliary pattern in 1%, and a mixed pattern in 8%. A cause could be determined in 21% of patients with normal histology, 85% with steatosis, 56% with hepatitis, 75% with biliary, but in none with isolated vascular pattern. Liver biopsy had important clinical and therapeutic implications in 15% of patients, with a diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Elevation of transaminases > 10 upper normal limit was present in all the patients with confirmed autoimmune hepatitis, but in only 7% of others.

CONCLUSION

Liver biopsy had important clinical and therapeutic implications in 15% of patients. However, the majority of patients had minimal changes without a cause, or minor vascular lesions of uncertain significance.

Rare Liver Diseases With Near-Normal Histology: A Review Focusing on Metabolic, Storage, and Inclusion Disorders

Despite the growing availability of noninvasive and faster diagnostic modalities, biopsy remains an important tool in the diagnosis and management of liver diseases. However, it is not uncommon that liver biopsies reveal normal or near normal histologic findings in patients with abnormal liver biochemistries, elevated autoantibodies, clinical findings suggestive of portal hypertension, systemic autoimmune or inflammatory diseases, hepatomegaly, cirrhosis by imaging, or other indications. These scenarios present significant diagnostic challenges and are rarely discussed in detail in the literature or textbooks. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of a group of selected rare liver diseases, with a focus on metabolic, storage and inclusion disorders, that may exhibit a near-normal histology on biopsy. By recognizing subtle histologic features and correlating with clinical history, laboratory results and imaging findings, it is often possible to narrow down the differential diagnosis. In many cases, this integrative approach can yield a definitive diagnosis, allowing for tailored treatment and better patient outcomes.

Comparing and combining MRE, T1ρ, SWI, IVIM, and DCE-MRI for the staging of liver fibrosis in rabbits: Assessment of a predictive model based on multiparametric MRI

PURPOSE

To establish and validate an optimal predictive model based on multiparametric MRI for staging liver fibrosis (LF) in rabbits with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T1ρ imaging), SWI, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and DCE-MRI.

METHODS

The LF group included 120 rabbits induced by subcutaneous injections of carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄ ); 30 normal rabbits served as the control group. Multiparametric MRI was performed, including MRE, T1ρ, SWI, IVIM, and DCE-MRI. The quantitative parameters were analyzed in two groups, with histopathological results serving as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI and the predictive model established by multivariable logistic regression analysis were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 32, 67, and 51 rabbits were histologically diagnosed as no fibrosis (stage F0), early-stage LF (F1-F2), and advanced-stage LF (F3-F4), respectively. The LF stages presented a strong correlation with liver stiffness (LS) on MRE (r = 0.90), signal-intensity ratio (SIR) on SWI (r = -0.84), and K^trans on DCE-MRI (r = 0.71; p < 0.05 for all). The LS and SIR parameters had higher AUC values for distinguishing early-stage LF from both no fibrosis (0.94 and 0.93, respectively) and advanced-stage LF (0.95 and 0.87, respectively). The predictive model showed a slightly higher AUC value of 0.97 (0.90-0.99) than LS and SIR in distinguishing early-stage LF from no fibrosis (p > 0.05), a significantly higher AUC value of 0.98 (0.93-0.99) than the SIR in distinguishing early-stage from advanced-stage LF (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

SWI, DCE-MRI, and MRE in particular showed improved performance for LF diagnosis and stage. The predictive model based on multiparametric MRI was found to further enhance diagnostic accuracy and could serve as an excellent imaging tool for staging LF.

The Utility of Liver Biopsy in the Evaluation of Liver Disease and Abnormal Liver Function Tests

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the value of liver biopsy in the evaluation of abnormal liver tests.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive liver biopsy specimens performed for evaluation of unexplained abnormal liver tests from 2014 to 2018. Diagnoses were categorized histologically and clinically. We determined whether histologic examination led to a specific diagnosis and whether prebiopsy laboratory variables predicted the underlying etiology.

RESULTS

Among the 383 liver biopsy specimens included, chronic hepatitis was the most common histologic (25%) and clinical (17%) diagnosis. Liver biopsy led to a clinical diagnosis in 87% of patients. The most likely clinical diagnoses were autoimmune hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and drug-induced liver injury (38, 33, and 32 patients, respectively). Using sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, we found that liver tests were not predictive of a specific diagnosis. In patients with no history of liver disease or clinical features of portal hypertension, biopsy specimens revealed histologic cirrhosis in 5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic diagnoses were made in 85% of patients undergoing liver biopsy for investigation of unexplained liver tests, leading to a clinical diagnosis in 87% of patients. However, neither liver tests themselves nor their patterns were useful in predicting histologic or clinical diagnoses.

Staging liver fibrosis on multiparametric MRI in a rabbit model with elastography, susceptibility-weighted imaging and T1ρ imaging: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), and T1ρ are three techniques for staging of liver fibrosis (LF).

PURPOSE

To assess the value of MRE, SWI, and T1ρ imaging in staging LF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty rabbits were injected with 50% CCl₄oil solution, whereas 20 rabbits were given normal saline. All rabbits underwent pathological examination to determine LF stages. The liver stiffness (LS), liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR), and T1ρ values were measured from MRE, SWI, and T1ρ imaging, respectively.

RESULTS

The number of rabbits was 14, 11, 10, 9, and 11 for F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4, respectively. LS (r = 0.91) and T1ρ (r = 0.51) positively correlated with LF stages, while negative correlation was present for SIR (r = -0.81). Among the three parameters, the LS values revealed the best diagnostic efficacy in staging LF, with an AUC value of 0.95 for ≥F1, 0.95 for ≥F2, 0.99 for ≥F3, and 0.98 for ≥F4. The combination of LS and SIR could best predict LF stages ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3 and ≥F4, with AUC values of 0.97, 0.98, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively, which were greater than those of the other two-paired parameters. A multiparametric analysis showed that the combination of all three parameters had AUC values of 0.97, 0.98, 1.00, and 1.00 for staging ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and ≥F4, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Multiparametric MR imaging was superior to individual imaging for LF staging.

The utility of liver biopsy in 2020

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the past decade, imaging modalities and serological tests have emerged as important tools in the evaluation of liver diseases, in many cases supplanting the use of liver biopsy and histological examination. Nonetheless, the accuracy and diagnostic value of these methods may not always be conclusive and the assessment of liver histology often remains the gold standard for diagnostic evaluation. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current role of liver biopsy in contemporary hepatology practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Technical factors were found to influence the diagnostic value of liver biopsy and histological examination of the liver, including specimen number and size (preferably ≥3 nonfragmented specimens of >20 mm in length), needle diameter (1.6 mm Menghini), number of passes (mean 2.5), imaging-guidance, and operator experience. Liver biopsy was demonstrated to be diagnostically valuable in the evaluation of persistently abnormal liver tests of unclear cause, with histology pointing to a specific diagnosis in 84% of patients. Although coagulation abnormalities continue to be an important concern when performing liver biopsy, their influence on complication risk remains unclear. Implementation of less stringent preprocedural coagulation thresholds decreased preprocedural transfusions without increasing the bleeding rate. Serious complications associated with percutaneous liver-biopsy (PLB) and transjugular liver-biopsy are similar, but pain appears to be more common with PLB.

SUMMARY

Histopathological evaluation continues to be fundamentally important in assessing hepatic disease, and liver histology remains the most accurate approach to assess fibrosis and assign prognosis.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the quantitative assessment of early-stage liver fibrosis induced by carbon tetrachloride in rabbits

PURPOSE

To explore quantitative parameters obtained by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) with Gd-EOB-DTPA in discriminating early-stage liver fibrosis (LF) in a rabbit model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

LF was established in 60 rabbits by the injection of 50% CCl₄ oil solution, whereas 30 rabbits served as the control group. All rabbits underwent pathological examination to determine the LF stage using the METAVIR classification system. DCE MRI was performed, and quantitative parameters, including K^trans, K_ep, V_e, V_p and Re were measured and evaluated among the different LF stages using spearman correlation coefficients and receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

In all, 24, 25, and 22 rabbits had stage F0, stage F1, and stage F2 LF, respectively. K^trans (r = 0.803) increased, and K_ep (r = -0.495) and Re (r = -0.701) decreased with LF stage progression (P < 0.001), while no significant correlation was found for V_e or V_p. K^trans and Re were significantly different between all LF stage pairs compared (F0 vs. F1, F0 vs. F2, F1 vs. F2, F0 vs. F1-F2, P < 0.05). With the exception of F0 vs. F1, K_ep differed significantly between stages (P < 0.05). The AUC of K^trans was higher than that of other quantitative parameters, with an AUC of 0.92, 0.99, 0.94 and 0.92 for staging F0 vs. F1, F0 vs. F2, F1 vs. F2, and F0 vs. F1-F2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among quantitative parameters of Gd-EOB-DTPA DCE MRI, K^trans was the best predictor for quantitatively differentiating early-stage LF.

Liver Histology: Diagnostic and Prognostic Features

When patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) undergo liver biopsy, the pathologist can provide a wealth of information on the morphologic changes. The most common histologic patterns of DILI include mimics of acute and chronic hepatitis as well as acute cholestasis, chronic cholestasis, and a mixed pattern that combines hepatitis with cholestasis. The pattern may suggest etiologies of injury or correlate with reported patterns of injury for specific agents. Biopsy may exonerate or indict particular drugs as causal agents of injury and provide specific information on severity of injury and specific types of changes related to various outcomes.

Approach to the Liver Biopsy in the Patient With Chronic Low-Level Aminotransferase Elevations

Pathologists sometimes encounter a liver biopsy from an asymptomatic patient with unexplained low-level parenchymal liver enzyme elevations. These biopsies often have minor histologic changes but are otherwise almost entirely normal. This can lead to the quandary of whether or not the features are clinically meaningful and how one must formulate a diagnosis from the possibly nonspecific findings of a near-normal biopsy. The following discussion focuses on the histologic changes that can be seen in these biopsies and the practical issues involved in making a diagnosis that provides useful information to the clinician. The literature and textbooks addressing the histologic and clinical features of these cases are reviewed with an emphasis on the clinical implications of finding nonspecific histologic alterations in these patients.