Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Ovary: A Report of 3 Primary Ovarian Tumors Resembling Those of the Pancreas

Case Report: Primary solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the ovary with "cholesteroma-like" denaturation

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) primarily arise in the pancreas and are uncommon in the ovaries. Here, we present a case of ovarian-origin SPN. Alongside the typical solid and pseudopapillary structures, "cholesteroma-like" denaturation areas and tissue degeneration regions are also observed. Immunohistochemistry analysis demonstrates positive results for β-catenin (nucleus), CD99 (dot-like), CD56, and vimentin. Imaging studies rule out pancreatic or other origins. This study aims to enhance comprehension, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis of primary ovarian SPN among pathologists and clinicians, as well as to investigate the origin and management of primary solid pseudopapillary tumors in the ovary.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in a 54-year-old woman: A case report and the literature analysis

INTRODUCTION

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare pancreatic tumor typically occurring in young females. This case presents an instance of SPN in a 54-year-old Caucasian female, highlighting atypical age of onset and providing new insights into the tumor's clinical and histopathological diversity.

CASE REPORT

A 54-year-old female with no significant past medical history presented with upper abdominal discomfort and weakness. Initial diagnostic imaging suggested a pancreatic tumor. The patient underwent laparotomic resection with pancreatic-gastric anastomosis. Histopathological analysis revealed a 2 cm tumor with mixed growth patterns - solid, trabecular, microcystic, and pseudopapillary - with varying cell types including vacuolated, eosinophilic, and clear cells. Despite showing malignant features such as local invasion in the adjacent pancreatic parenchyma, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, areas of haemorrhage, and focal nuclear atypia, no metastasis was observed. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the diagnosis of SPN with aberrant β-catenin expression. The tumor was resected successfully, and the patient had an uneventful recovery with no additional therapy required. A 60-month follow-up showed no recurrence.

CONCLUSION

This case underscores the rarity of SPN in older patients and the variability in its histopathological presentation. Different growth patterns and microscopic malignant features of SPNs should be taken into account during histological evaluation and pathological reporting, as they may be important for determination of tumor prognostic potential and treatment strategies. Further research is needed to standardize pathologic evaluations and improve understanding of SPN recurrence and management.

First case report of diagnosis of extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor with SMA invasion in a 47-year-old man: a case report and literature review

Background

Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas (SPT) is a rare low-grade malignant tumor predominantly observed in young women without significant clinical symptoms. While most SPTs occur in the pancreatic region, rare cases have occurred in the retroperitoneum, making the diagnosis of ectopic SPTs difficult.

Case presentation

Herein, we report a rare case of an extrapancreatic solid SPT with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) involvement in a 47-year-old man together with a literature review to provide context with clinical information, CT and a literature review.

Conclusions

This case may provide a practical approach for the diagnosis of ectopic SPT, especially for patients with vascular invasion.

Primary Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Ovary: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are rare and mainly originate from the pancreas. SPNs originating from the ovary (SPN-O) are extremely rare, and only 13 cases have been reported in the English literature since 2010.

CASE

We report a 31-year-old woman with SPN-O accompanied by multiple metastases in the abdominal cavity. The patient underwent staging surgery and cytoreduction. Furthermore, the multidisciplinary board decided on adjuvant chemotherapy with an FP regimen (fluorouracil plus cisplatin) because a microscopic metastasis was discovered in the peritoneum near the appendix. Next-generation sequencing showed some pathologic mutations of oncogenes/cancer-associated genes, including CTNNB1 and TP53. This is the fourteenth case of SPN-O and the first one to demonstrate the TP53 pathogenic mutant variant in SPN-O. The patient showed 8 months of disease-free survival until February 2024.

CONCLUSION

The combination of R0 cytoreduction with FOLFIRI chemotherapy appears to be an effective and feasible treatment option.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas: current understanding on its malignant potential and management

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN) of the pancreas are presently recognized as low-grade malignant tumors that are frequently observed in young females. This tumor has a low incidence and is associated with an excellent prognosis following surgical resection. Typical SPNs primarily affect the pancreas and tend to have moderate or asymptomatic manifestations. Based on retrospective research, it is anticipated that patients with SPN can achieve disease-free survival, even in cases when metastasis is detected during inspection. However, the incidence of malignant SPN has been consistently underestimated, as evidenced by recent research findings. Malignancy of SPN primarily encompasses invasion and infiltration, metastasis, and recurrence after R0 resection. Imaging technologies such as Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Position Emission Tomography are capable of preliminarily identifying malignant SPN, which is primarily based on its invasive clinical features. Research on risk factors of malignant SPN revealed that larger tumor size, Ki-67 index, and several other parameters had significant correlations with invasive tumor behavior. Pathologic features of malignant SPNs overlay other pancreatic tumors, nevertheless they can provide valuable assistance in the process of diagnosis. Several confirmed specific pathologic biomarkers are related to its cellular origin, characteristic gene mutation, and cell proliferation. Considering the invasiveness of malignant SPN, it is imperative to enhance the comprehensiveness of its therapy. Tumor resection remains a suggested course of action in line with typical SPN, and additional lymph node dissection is seen as reasonable. Compared to benign SPNs, malignant SPNs have worse prognosis, underscoring the necessity of early identification and treatment in comprehensive medical centers to get improved clinical outcomes.

Rare Solid Pancreatic Lesions on Cross-Sectional Imaging

Several solid lesions can be found within the pancreas mainly arising from the exocrine and endocrine pancreatic tissue. Among all pancreatic malignancies, the most common subtype is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), to a point that pancreatic cancer and PDAC are used interchangeably. But, in addition to PDAC, and to the other most common and well-known solid lesions, either related to benign conditions, such as pancreatitis, or not so benign, such as pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), there are solid pancreatic lesions considered rare due to their low incidence. These lesions may originate from a cell line with a differentiation other than exocrine/endocrine, such as from the nerve sheath as for pancreatic schwannoma or from mesenchymal cells as for solitary fibrous tumour. These rare solid pancreatic lesions may show a behaviour that ranges in a benign to highly aggressive malignant spectrum. This review includes cases of an intrapancreatic accessory spleen, pancreatic tuberculosis, solid serous cystadenoma, solid pseudopapillary tumour, pancreatic schwannoma, purely intraductal neuroendocrine tumour, pancreatic fibrous solitary tumour, acinar cell carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclastic-like giant cells, adenosquamous carcinoma, colloid carcinoma of the pancreas, primary leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas, primary and secondary pancreatic lymphoma and metastases within the pancreas. Therefore, it is important to determine the correct diagnosis to ensure optimal patient management. Because of their rarity, their existence is less well known and, when depicted, in most cases incidentally, the correct diagnosis remains challenging. However, there are some typical imaging features present on cross-sectional imaging modalities that, taken into account with the clinical and biological context, contribute substantially to achieve the correct diagnosis.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: Report of a case of primary ovarian origin and review of the literature

Background

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are uncommon tumors of low malignancy with a generally favorable prognosis, mostly originating from the pancreas. To date, 12 cases of SPNs with a primary ovarian origin (SPN-Os) have been reported globally, and their detailed characteristics have not been fully elucidated.

Case description

We reported the 13th SPN-O case, which occurred in a 52-year-old woman with an 18.5 cm left ovarian mass. Four imaging methods, including ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, were utilized before surgery. An elevated level of serum cancer antigen 125 was detected and a total hysterectomy plus bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Microscopic examination revealed a typical solid pseudopapillary structure. The tumor cells were stained focally for pan-cytokeratin, synaptophysin, CD99 and CD10, while β-catenin, vimentin and CD56 were diffusely expressed. The Ki-67 proliferation index was 3%, and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for chromogranin-A, inhibin-a, and E-cadherin was negative. No evidence of recurrence or metastasis was observed by clinical and imaging data during a 5-month postoperative follow-up.

Conclusion

This is a report of an unusual case of a primary ovarian SPN with an up-to-date review of SPN-Os. A minimum combination of imaging methods and IHC stains was proposed for SPN-Os, which may prove beneficial in clinical practice.

Update on Ovarian Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors

This article focuses on the recent advances in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors, predominantly in the setting of their molecular underpinnings. The integration of genetic information with morphologic and immunohistochemical findings in this rare subset of tumors is of clinical significance from refining the diagnostic and prognostic stratifications to genetic counseling.

Ovarian Signet-ring Stromal Tumor: A Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Study of 7 Cases With Discussion of the Differential Diagnosis

Signet-ring stromal tumor (SRST) is a rare ovarian stromal neoplasm characterized by a population of bland signet-ring cells, devoid of mucin or lipid, in a generally cellular fibromatous stroma. Previous reports have described heterogenous immunohistochemical and molecular genetic findings, including occasional nuclear β-catenin expression and/or CTNNB1 mutations. We report 10 ovarian stromal neoplasms originally diagnosed as SRST. All but 1 tumor underwent detailed immunohistochemical analysis (including β-catenin) and 5 of 10 had CTNNB1 mutation analysis performed. All tumors contained a population of morphologically bland signet-ring cells that ranged from 15% to 95% of the neoplasm, characterized by a single large empty intracytoplasmic vacuole, mostly with nuclear indentation. Six of the 10 tumors contained cellular fibroma-like areas, comprising from 10% to 85% of the neoplasm. Three of the 10 tumors were reclassified as microcystic stromal tumor with signet-ring cells on the basis of the microcyst formation and hyalinized stroma, beta-catenin and cyclin D1 nuclear expression and/or CTNNB1 mutation, CD10 staining and largely absent expression of inhibin and calretinin. In the remaining 7 tumors, the diagnosis of SRST remained, constituting the largest series of SRST reported in the literature to date. The results of our study suggest that a subset of tumors diagnosed as ovarian SRST, especially those which show β-catenin nuclear positivity and/or CTNNB1 mutation, likely represent microcystic stromal tumor with variant morphology. We also suggest that at least a subset of SRSTs without evidence of Wnt/β-catenin pathway abnormalities may be related to ovarian fibromas. We discuss the differential diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms containing signet-ring cells.

Low-Grade Ovarian Stromal Tumors with Genetic Alterations of the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway That Is Crucial in Ovarian Follicle Development and Regulation

The Wnt signaling pathway is important in the normal development and regulation of ovarian follicles throughout the lifecycle of females. Dysregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway, genetically or epigenetically, with subsequent activation of β-catenin has been implicated in tumorigenesis of a spectrum of ovarian neoplasms, from benign to malignant. We review the recent findings of the Wnt signaling pathway involved in regulating normal physiologic processes of the ovarian follicle cycle. We also review the β-catenin mutations in a family of low-grade ovarian stromal tumors, focusing on characterizing their shared morphological features and the utility of immunohistochemistry of β-catenin in facilitating the accurate diagnosis of these ovarian stromal tumors. The Wnt signaling pathway is one of the most critical mechanisms in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, and morphogenesis. The Wnt signaling pathway comprises a diverse group of glycoproteins that serve as ligands and bind to transmembrane Frizzled family receptors. The ligand-receptor interactions activate the pathway and govern the downstream signaling cascades, ultimately affecting the transcriptional control of the cellular cytoskeleton, organelle dynamics, epithelial-mesenchymal interaction, and tissue remodeling in the ovary. Wnt signaling consists of two major pathways: a canonical pathway that is β-catenin-dependent and a non-canonical Wnt pathway that is β-catenin-independent. Canonical Wnt signaling is governed by the interaction of β-catenin with other molecules to regulate cellular decisions related to proliferation and differentiation. Recent studies have demonstrated that the Wnt signaling pathway plays important roles in the development and regulation of ovarian folliculogenesis and oogenesis.

Case report: A case report and literature review of extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

Background

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare tumor with low malignant potential, which typically occurs in the pancreas. Extrapancreatic SPN is also extremely rare worldwide.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 70-year-old woman hospitalized with abdominal pain and bloating. The patient did not have any underlying diseases, such as diabetes, coronary heart disease, or hypertension. More than 30 years ago, the patient underwent surgery for “ectopic pregnancy”. The patient had no family history of hereditary disease, nor did any immediate family members have a history of cancer. Laboratory tests showed that her hemoglobin and albumin levels were low and she had a high level of cancer antigen 125 (CA125). Enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed a large tumor in the abdomen and pelvis. The patient subsequently underwent surgery, and it was found that the tumor was attached to the terminal ileum. Pathological findings suggested that the tumor was an extrapancreatic SPN, with an ectopic pancreas found in the tumor tissue. The patient did not receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy after surgery. After 13 months of follow-up, the patient was admitted again with abdominal pain. CT showed tumor recurrence with extensive systemic metastases. The patient and her family refused reoperation and biopsy, and the patient was discharged after the abdominal pain and anemia resolved.

Conclusion

We report a rare case of extrapancreatic SPN of ileal origin, which could be the first report worldwide. It had aggressive biological features, with recurrence and metastasis 13 months after surgery. For extrapancreatic SPN, the risk of recurrence should be assessed, and for tumors suspected of malignant behavior, a longer follow-up after discharge may be needed. Although SPN generally has a good prognosis after surgery, there is no consensus on whether postoperative chemotherapy and other treatments are needed for patients with high recurrence risk.

Update on Ovarian Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors

This article focuses on the recent advances in ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors, predominantly in the setting of their molecular underpinnings. The integration of genetic information with morphologic and immunohistochemical findings in this rare subset of tumors is of clinical significance from refining the diagnostic and prognostic stratifications to genetic counseling.

Ovarian microcystic stromal tumour: From morphological observations to syndromic associations

Microcystic stromal tumour (MST) is a rare, usually benign, ovarian neoplasm characterised morphologically in its classic form by a distinctive triad of features comprising microcysts, solid cellular regions and fibrous stroma. Variant morphology also occurs, including the presence of nests, tubules, cords, and signet ring cells. Immunohistochemically, this neoplasm is characterised by diffuse nuclear expression of β-catenin, cyclin D1, WT1 and SF1, as well as diffuse staining with FOXL2 and CD10. Inhibin and calretinin are typically negative. At the genomic level, these neoplasms harbour mutually exclusive mutations in CTNNB1 or APC genes with the former being significantly more common. This molecular characteristic raises possible links to other rare ovarian lesions including solid pseudopapillary tumour, signet-ring stromal tumour and Sertoli cell tumour. Rarely, MST is an extracolonic manifestation of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and serves as a sentinel event that could trigger the identification of the syndrome. Herein, we review the published literature on ovarian MST and provide practical advice for pathologists reporting these rare neoplasms.

A 46-Year-Old Woman with Primary Infertility and a Diagnosis of Microcystic Stromal Tumor of the Ovary Confirmed by Histology and Gene Sequencing: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Patient: Female, 46-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Microcystic stromal tumor of the ovary

Symptoms: Abdominal pain • vaginal bleeding

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Pathology

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms are rare. This article reviews the clinical and pathologic features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas, including the epidemiology, cytology, molecular pathology, differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms are low-grade malignant tumours of the pancreas characterized by poorly cohesive epithelial cells with solid and pseudopapillary patterns. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms occur predominantly in young women. Although solid pseudopapillary neoplasms can occur throughout the pancreas, they arise slightly more frequently in the tail of the pancreas. The aetiology is unknown. Extremely rare cases have been reported in the setting of familial adenomatous polyposis. There are no symptoms unique to solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, however, the most common symptom is abdominal pain or discomfort. The features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms on computed tomography imaging are indicative of the pathologic changes within the tumour. Typically, well-demarcated masses with variably solid and cystic appearances. Microscopically, these tumours are composed of epithelial cells forming solid and pseudopapillary structures, frequently undergoing haemorrhagic cystic degeneration. Typically, these tumours express nuclear and/or cytoplasmic β-catenin. Almost all solid pseudopapillary neoplasms harbour mutations in exon 3 of CTNNB1, the gene encoding β-catenin. The overall prognosis is excellent, and most patients are cured by complete surgical resection.

Endometrioid Tubal Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Bilateral Ovarian Microcystic Stromal Tumors Harboring APC Mutations: Report of a Case

Microcystic ovarian tumor of the ovary is a neoplasm of presumed stromal derivation characterized by CTNNB1 or APC alterations leading to nuclear β-catenin expression. This tumor has been described as unilateral and indolent in previously published series. The recently characterized endometrioid tubal intraepithelial neoplasia (eTIN) is an epithelial proliferation of the tube also characterized by nuclear β-catenin staining, and distinct from high-grade serous precursors. Herein, a case of bilateral ovarian microcystic stromal tumors and multiple left tubal eTINs discovered incidentally in a 41-yr-old woman with previous history of colon cancer is described. Both ovarian and tubal proliferations harbored APC inactivating mutations. Although history of familial adenomatous polyposis or a germline defect could not be confirmed, the history of colon cancer at a young age and the shared APC mutation in both microcystic stromal tumor and eTIN were suggestive of this possibility. Microcystic stromal tumor has been described in the setting of familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. This case adds to this association by documenting for the first time bilateral ovarian involvement by microcystic stromal tumor. Moreover, it alerts to the possibility of endometrioid neoplasia of the fallopian tube secondary to APC mutations, a previously undescribed phenomenon.

Pseudoendocrine Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 23 Cases of a Distinctive Soft Tissue Neoplasm With Metastatic Potential, Recurrent CTNNB1 Mutations, and a Predilection for Truncal Locations

The number of recognized epithelioid soft tissue neoplasms continues to increase and includes epithelioid schwannoma, sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma, and emerging entities such as sarcomas with GLI1 alterations. Here, we describe 23 cases of a previously unrecognized entity, provisionally termed "pseudoendocrine sarcoma." Pseudoendocrine sarcoma is a rare, distinctive tumor of uncertain lineage with a predilection for paravertebral soft tissue in older adults. Fifteen patients (65%) were male and 8 were female. Age at presentation ranged from 29 to 78 years (median: 62 y). Nineteen tumors (83%) occurred in truncal locations, including 15 tumors (65%) in paravertebral soft tissue; other locations included the posterior head (2 tumors), thigh (1), and orbit (1). Tumor size ranged from 2 to 19 cm (median: 6.35 cm). Pseudoendocrine sarcoma is composed of sheets, trabeculae, and nests of epithelioid or ovoid cells with indistinct borders, palely eosinophilic cytoplasm, and highly monomorphic, round nuclei with speckled chromatin. Pseudoglandular architecture was at least focally present in 16 tumors (70%), large extracellular hyaline globules were identified in 12 tumors (52%), and psammomatous calcifications were present in 8 (35%). Metaplastic ossification was identified in 2 tumors, and myxoid stroma was present in 1. Lymphovascular invasion was present in 5 of 18 tumors (28%). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that most tumors showed nuclear positivity for β-catenin (20/21 tumors; 95%), and some showed at least focal positivity for S-100 (9/22; 41%), desmin (3/8; 38%), or CD34 (2/8; 25%). All tumors were negative for neuroendocrine and epithelial markers, including synaptophysin (21 tumors), chromogranin (19), INSM1 (4), pan-K (16), CAM5.2 (13), AE1/AE3 (6), epithelial membrane antigen (20), and E-cadherin (13). DNA sequencing detected CTNNB1 point mutations in all 6 sequenced tumors: D32H, S33C, S33F, S37A, S37C, and S37F. RNA sequencing was negative for gene fusions in all 6 sequenced tumors. Clinical follow-up was available for 17 patients (74%; range: 4 mo to 20 y; median: 3.5 y), including 14 patients with >1 year of follow-up. Six of 14 patients with long-term follow-up experienced local recurrence (43%, at intervals of 3 to 6 y). One tumor showed a local lymph node metastasis within the primary excision specimen, and 3 patients developed distant lung metastases (21%). No patient died of the disease as yet. Despite its bland morphology and resemblance to the well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, pseudoendocrine sarcoma is best considered an intermediate-grade sarcoma, given its pathologic characteristics and clinical behavior.

Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm: Key Pathologic and Genetic Features

CONTEXT.—

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas is a low-grade malignant tumor generally associated with a good prognosis. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms show peculiar morphologic features, but sometimes the differential diagnosis with other pancreatic neoplasms (ie, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors) can be a challenging task, especially in cytologic or biopsy specimens. In these cases immunohistochemistry is a useful tool, but the diagnostic utility of several proposed immunohistochemical markers is questionable. In recent years, despite several attempts to characterize the pathogenetic, molecular, and prognostic features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, they still remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE.—

To give the reader a comprehensive update on this entity.

DATA SOURCES.—

The PubMed database (US National Library of Medicine) was searched using the following string: pseudopapillary tumor [AND/OR] neoplasm [AND/OR] pancreas. All articles written in English were included. In addition, because a heterogeneous terminology has been used in the past to define solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, the reference lists of each paper selected in the PubMed database were also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This review gives a comprehensive update on the pathologic, clinical, and molecular features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, particularly addressing issues and challenges related to diagnosis. In addition, we have tried to correlate the molecular alterations with the morphologic and clinical features.

A Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Comparison of Nuclear β-Catenin Expressing Testicular Sertoli Cell Tumors and Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms Supporting Their Continued Separate Classification

Some recent reports suggested that many Sertoli cell tumors, not otherwise specified (SCTs-NOS) of the testis were analogs of the solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas. One of the most relied on pieces of information for this assertion was the shared occurrence in both neoplasms of exon 3 mutations of the CTNNB1 gene, which was reflected by nuclear β-catenin expression. We, therefore, compared the morphologic and immunohistochemical features of 18 SCTs-NOS with strong, diffuse nuclear β-catenin expression with 16 SPNs that also showed such positivity. Although there were clear similarities in the light microscopic features of these neoplasms, there were also significant differences that included, in SCT-NOS and SPN, respectively: hollow tubules (53% vs. 0%), sheet-like growth (44% vs. 94%), circumscription (79% vs. 25%), corded or trabecular patterns (81% vs. 31%), formation of papillae or pseudopapillae (24% vs. 69%), growth in nests or clusters (94% vs. 50%), perivascular pseudorosettes (13% vs. 56%), and rhabdoid cytology (6% vs. 50%). Commonly shared morphologic features included signet-ring cells, pale or foamy cytoplasm, myxoid stroma, cyst formation, perivascular hyalinization, and globular or band-like basement membrane deposits. On immunohistochemical study, sex cord markers were frequently positive in SCTs-NOS (steroidogenic factor-1-94%; FOXL2-87%; SOX9-69%; calretinin-60%; Wilms tumor-1-38%; inhibin-29%) whereas all of these markers were negative in the SPNs. We conclude that even though SCT-NOS and SPN share some morphologic features and nuclear immunoreactivity for β-catenin, there remain differences, both morphologically and immunohistochemically, between these neoplasms to the degree that SCT-NOS should not be equated with pancreatic SPN.

Ovarian Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor Resembling Benign Hemorrhagic Cyst on Rapid Frozen Section

Solid pseudopapillary tumors are rare, with the majority of described cases originating in the pancreas. To date, there are only 10 documented reports of primary ovarian solid pseudopapillary tumors. Here, we describe the case of a 24-year-old woman who presented with worsening pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea. Workup demonstrated a right ovarian solid mass on ultrasound and an elevated serum LDH, which raised concerns for dysgerminoma due to her relatively young age. Therefore, she was taken to the operating room and underwent laparoscopic right salpingo-oophorectomy. On initial rapid frozen section, her ovarian cyst had a grossly hemorrhagic appearance with multiple hemosiderin deposits noted microscopically, which suggested a benign hemorrhagic cyst. However, the final pathology was reported as solid pseudopapillary tumor based on several defining histologic characteristics. Most importantly, immunostaining was positive for β-catenin and negative for E-cadherin. This report presents a brief review of the current literature on primary ovarian solid pseudopapillary tumors, including a discussion of expected prognosis after surgical resection, as well as a discussion of the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in differentiating ovarian neoplasms in young premenopausal women.

Practical Review of Ovarian Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors

Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors are uncommon tumors and clinically differ from epithelial tumors. They occur across a wide age range and patients often present with hormone-related symptoms. Most are associated with an indolent clinical course. Sex cord-stromal tumors are classified into 3 main categories: pure stromal tumors, pure sex cord tumors, and mixed sex cord-stromal tumors. The rarity, overlapping histomorphology and immunoprofile of various sex cord-stromal tumors often contributes to diagnostic difficulties. This article describes the various types of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors and includes practical approaches to differential diagnoses and updates in classification.

Ovarian tumors: a survey of selected advances of note during the life of this journal

The author reviews highlights of advances in knowledge concerning ovarian tumor pathology since the time of an essay in the first issue of this Journal written by Dr Robert E. Scully, who, both before and for several decades after the Journal was instituted, made many original contributions to the field and was the major architect of the 1973 World Health Organization classification of ovarian tumors which was much more clear and logical than prior ones. The current review considers the neoplasms in essentially the same order as was done in the first issue of this journal and presents a personal look at the highlights of new information concerning various well-known categories, surface epithelial, germ cell, sex cord-stromal, metastatic neoplasms and briefly, benign so-called tumor-like lesions. Some of the most notable developments are as follows: (1) an orderly approach to the classification of implants of serous borderline tumors into noninvasive and invasive categories; (2) recognition of distinctive micropapillary patterns seen in some borderline tumors and low-grade carcinomas; (3) a remarkable propensity for some endometrioid carcinomas to mimic sex cord- stromal tumors; (4) appreciation of the differences between primary mucinous tumors of intestinal and müllerian types; (5) the importance of distinguishing within primary mucinous carcinomas between expansile and destructive stromal invasion; (6) emphasis on the diagnosis of immature teratoma being based on the presence of primitive-embryonic-appearing tissues; (7) appreciation of variant morphology of cases of struma ovarii which may lead to significant diagnostic problems; (8) subdivision of granulosa cell tumors into adult and juvenile types because of the differing features of the two groups including in the second category the propensity for more malignant neoplasms to be mimicked; (9) recognition of a distinctive form of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, the retiform variant, with a propensity to occur in the young; (10) appreciation of a unique highly malignant neoplasm that typically afflicts the young and may be associated with hypercalcemia, so-called small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type; (11) greater awareness than was hitherto the case of the propensity for metastatic intestinal adenocarcinoma to mimic primary endometrioid carcinoma and similarly for metastatic mucinous carcinomas to simulate primary mucinous cystic tumors; (12) recognition of the distinctive features of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms that spread to the ovary and are typically associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei; and (13) appreciation that the histologic spectrum seen in cases of Krukenberg tumor is broader than often previously thought.

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the testis: Comprehensive mutational analysis of 6 testicular and 8 pancreatic SPNs

BACKGROUND

Recently, we came with the theory of a possible relationship between a group of testicular and pancreatic tumors. We used one case of a pancreatic analogue solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the testis composed partially of areas reminiscent of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas and partially of structures identical to primary signet ring stromal tumor of the testis (PSRSTT) as a connecting link between these two entities. After demonstrating that PSRSTT and pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis share the same immunoprofile and genetic features characteristic for pancreatic SPN, we came to the conclusion that pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis and PSRSTT represent a morphological spectrum of a single entity and that both are related to the pancreatic SPN.

DESIGN

The aim of this study is to present a series of 6 cases of testicular tumors, which lacked the signet ring cell component and were thus morphologically very similar to the SPN of the pancreas. The goal of this study is to compare the genetic background of these testicular tumors that are obviously related to the PSRSTT/pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis with the series of 8 pancreatic SPN.

RESULTS

The mutational analysis revealed an oncogenic somatic mutation in the exon 3 of the CTNNB1 (β-catenin) gene in all analyzable (5/6) testicular and all pancreatic (8/8) tumors. The immunoprofile (positivity with β-catenin, CD10, vimentin, NSE, CD56, and negativity with inhibin, calretinin, chromogranin) was identical in all testicular and pancreatic tumors.

CONCLUSION

This study expanded the morphological spectrum of the PSRSTT/pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis by adding 6 cases without the signet ring cell component. Considering the obvious analogy of PSRSTT/pancreatic analogue SPN of the testis/SPN of the testis and their relationship to the pancreatic SPN we propose the collective term "solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the testis" for these tumors. The mutational profile of the SPN of the testis and pancreas was the same in both groups of tumors which we consider as a final proof that SPN of the testis is identical to the SPN of the pancreas.

Extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm followed by multiple metastases: Case report

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN), also known as Gruber-Frantz tumor, is a rare form of neoplasm that almost exclusively occurs in the pancreas and in young females. While the potential of malignancy is low for SPN, these tumors can mimic other diseases and require a meticulous investigation and a standard treatment by total surgical resection. We present an unusual case of SPN arising in the mesentery of a 40-year-old man with subsequent multiple metastases. Histopathological examination showed similar properties of the mesenteric neoplasm to those of SPN in pancreas. Although the mass was surgically removed, the patient died of recurrent disease 4 years after the initial presentation. We speculate that SPN originates from pancreatic progenitor cells. Further histopathological analyses are required for the prediction of SPN recurrence after resection.

Radiologic Findings in Extrapancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor with Aggressive Behavior: a Case Report

Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is a low grade malignant tumor in the pancreas, and extrapancreatic SPT is extremely rare. We report a case of a 61-year-old woman who complained abdominal pain with diffuse tenderness. She was diagnosed with extrapancreatic SPT with extensive peritoneal dissemination and hepatic metastases. Although a few cases have reported imaging findings of extrapancreatic SPT, there have been no reports of extrapancreatic SPT with aggressive tumor behavior and dismal prognosis. Although imaging features closely resembled those of classical pancreatic SPTs, malignant transformation of extrapancreatic SPT should be considered when focal discontinuity of the tumor capsule with ill-defined margin and invasion of adjacent structures were identified.

'Microcystic pattern' should be recognised as part of the morphological spectrum of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas

AIM

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is an uncommon pancreatic tumour characterised by solid and pseudopapillary growth patterns. We have observed SPNs can show a microcystic pattern (microcystic SPN), which has been poorly described and may be confused with microcystic neoplasms. We conducted the present study to clarify the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of microcystic SPNs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined a consecutive series of 44 SPNs and 10 serous cystadenomas (SCAs), and classified them into 13 microcystic SPNs (29.5%) and 31 conventional SPNs (70.5%). Clinicopathological analysis, immunohistochemical staining and mucin histochemistry were performed. Clear cell change, hyalinised stroma and haemorrhage were observed significantly more frequently in the microcystic SPNs compared to the conventional SPNs. Immunohistochemically, the microcystic SPNs showed significantly lower frequencies of CD10 (0%) and CD56 expression (62%) compared to the conventional SPNs (87%; P < 0.001, 90%; P < 0.0085, respectively). There were no significant differences in other clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features between the two groups (i.e. the nuclear expression of β-catenin, E-cadherin, progesterone receptor (PgR), lack of forkhead box (Fox)L2 and occasional oestrogen receptor (ER), AE1/AE3 expression). Microcystic SCAs lack such a characteristic immunophenotype. The myxoid stroma of microcystic SPNs contained hyaluronan revealed by Alcian blue stain with hyaluronidase digestion.

CONCLUSION

We thus conclude that the microcystic pattern should be recognised as a part of the morphological spectrum of SPNs. Our findings may contribute to the correct diagnosis of the pancreatic neoplasms with the microcystic pattern. In addition, we speculate that stromal change caused by an accumulation of hyaluronan may contribute to the microcystic pattern of SPN.

An extrapancreatic solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm in the greater omentum

A solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is an uncommon pancreatic tumour that usually occurs in young women. Tumours outside the pancreas (e.g. in the ovary, retroperitoneum or omentum) are rare. We report a case of an SPN arising from the greater omentum in a 78-year-old male who presented with a month-long history of abdominal pain and a palpable abdominal mass. Laboratory data showed inflammation and anaemia. CT and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-defined encapsulated mass measuring 18 cm in the upper right abdomen. The tumour was completely removed via surgery, and pathologic examination confirmed a diagnosis of an SPN in the greater omentum.

Pancreatic analogue solid pseudopapillary neoplasm arising in the paratesticular location. The first case report

We describe the first pancreatic analogue of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm arising in paratesticular location. It was a tumor arising in 32-year-old man adhering closely to the testis. The tumor had several morphologic components. The greatest was represented by signet ring cells which gradually changed into solid, non-signet ring cell areas, often being mixed together. It also formed distinct trabeculae and pseudopapillae frequently adhering to cystic areas of the tumor. Immunohistochemically, the tumor had an identical profile to its pancreatic counterpart. The tumor cells reacted diffusely with S100 protein, β-catenin, cyclin D1, Fli-1, vimentin, CD10, galectin-3, and neuron-specific enolase and focally with synaptophysin. CD56 and E-cadherin reacted only in those parts of the tumor, which formed pseudopapillae. Cytokeratin antibody AE1-AE3 was strongly positive in the areas of trabecular formation of the tumor. The mutational analysis of exon 3 of the CTNNB1 gene confirmed mutation in this exon.

Extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors: A clinicopathological analysis of two cases

Solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) are unusual neoplasms that mostly occur in the pancreas, and predominantly affect young women. As a low-grade malignant neoplasm of the exocrine pancreas, they occasionally metastasize, usually to the liver or peritoneum. It has been reported that <1% of SPTs are primary extrapancreatic SPTs. In the present study, we present two rare, but conspicuous extrapancreatic SPTs. Both occurred in young women, and showed good prognoses following surgery. One was a recurrent SPT of the pancreas that metastasized to the ovary, and the other was a distinct primary neoplasm that arose in the retroperitoneal area. The pathological features of the two tumors, including solid and pseudopapillary growth patterns with pale or eosinophilic cytoplasm, were characteristic of SPTs of the pancreas. However, in the case of the metastatic ovarian tumor, focal necrosis and an increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio were observed. The presence of positive nuclear-cytoplasmic β-catenin, the loss of membranous E-cadherin expression, and a perinuclear punctate CD99 staining pattern on immunohistochemistical analysis, were essential features for diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to compare the morphological and immunohistochemical features of these tumors with those typical of pancreatic SPTs, and to raise awareness that SPTs are able to metastasize to unusual sites, and may also arise as primary tumors outside the pancreas, which may lead to diagnostic dilemmas.

CTNNB1 (β-Catenin)-altered Neoplasia: A Review Focusing on Soft Tissue Neoplasms and Parenchymal Lesions of Uncertain Histogenesis

β-catenin (CTNNB1) is a key regulatory molecule of the Wnt signaling pathway, which is important for tissue homeostasis and regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, and function. Abnormal stabilization and nuclear accumulation of β-catenin as a consequence of missense mutations or alternative molecular mechanisms occurs at a high frequency in a variety of epithelial cancers. In mesenchymal neoplasia, the role of β-catenin has been traditionally considered limited to desmoid-type fibromatosis. However, the spectrum of β-catenin-driven (β-catenin-altered) neoplasia of mesenchymal origin has been steadily widening to include, in addition to desmoid tumors, a variety of benign and intermediate-biology neoplasms of soft tissue (intranodal palisaded myofibroblastoma), head and neck (juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma and sinonasal hemangiopericytoma/glomangiopericytoma), and ovarian (microcystic stromal tumor) origin. In addition, several old and newly reported distinctive site-specific β-catenin-driven parenchymal neoplasms of uncertain histogenesis have been well characterized in recent studies, including solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas and its recently described ovarian counterpart, sclerosing hemangioma of lung and calcifying nested stromal-epithelial tumor of the liver. This review addresses the most relevant pathobiological and differential diagnostic aspects of β-catenin-altered neoplasms with emphasis on site-specific histologic and biological variations. In addition, the morphologic overlap and analogy as well as distinctness between these uncommon tumors will be presented and discussed. Furthermore, a note is made on association of some of these lesions with hereditary tumor syndromes, in particular with the familial adenomatous polyposis coli.

Microcystic stromal tumour of the ovary: frequent mutations of β-catenin (CTNNB1) in six cases

AIMS

To analyse the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical and β-catenin (CTNNB1) mutation characteristics of six cases of microcystic stromal tumour of the ovary (MCST).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Six Chinese patients with MCST who ranged in age from 29 to 69 years (mean 50 years) were included in the study. Five patients were detected with a pelvic mass during routine health examinations and one patient presented initially with opsomenorrhoea. All tumours involved the left ovary, with solid-cystic cut surface in five cases and cystic cut surface in one case. Microscopically, microcysts, solid nests and hyaline degenerated fibrous stroma were variably mixed. Immunohistochemically, the tumour cells in all cases were diffusely positive for CD10, vimentin and WT-1 and negative for α-inhibin and calretinin. β-catenin expression was observed in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm in five cases and only in the cytoplasm in one case. The results of CTNNB1 mutation analysis revealed four missense point mutations in four cases, which were c.97T>C, c.101G>A, c.110C>G and c.122C>T.

CONCLUSIONS

MCST shows a unique morphology with characteristic immunophenotype. β-catenin expression in the nucleus and β-catenin mutations were identified in the majority of cases, which suggests that the Wnt/β-catenin pathway may play a crucial role in the tumorigenesis of MCST.