Refractory Status Epilepticus in Children: Intention to Treat With Continuous Infusions of Midazolam and Pentobarbital

Challenges in Management of Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome: Real-World Experience From a Large Cohort of Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a catastrophic neuroinflammatory disorder with refractory status epilepticus. The disease management continues to pose significant challenges.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of patients with FIRES managed at tertiary care centers in India. The follow-up outcome was assessed using the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE).

RESULTS

Forty-one children (27 males) were eligible. The mean presentation age was 7.2 years (range, 2-14). A median of 7 (range, 2-12) antiseizure medications (ASMs) were tried before pharmacologic coma, which was subsequently required in all patients. The pharmacologic coma was induced for a median duration of 11 days (range, 1-125), with midazolam (41) being the most common medication, followed by ketamine (33), thiopentone (18), and isoflurane (13). Only a minority had seizure resolution on pharmacologic coma (ketamine 21%, midazolam 17%, and thiopentone 16.6%). Ninety-seven percent children also concurrently received methylprednisolone (40), 63% intravenous immunoglobulin (26), 32% rituximab (13), 32% cyclophosphamide (13), and 56% ketogenic diet (23). At a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 9-96), 34% (14) children had died. Of the remaining 27, epilepsy was poorly controlled in the majority (18 children, 67%). Also, 14 patients had a CASE score of ≤5 (good outcome) and 13 had a score of >5 (poor outcome). In both groups, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes with the ketogenic diet, pharmacologic coma, or immunomodulatory therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of FIRES in children is challenging, with limited effectiveness of most currently practiced anesthetic agents and conventional immunomodulatory therapies in seizure control and in altering the outcome in FIRES.

Japanese guidelines for treatment of pediatric status epilepticus - 2023

The updated definition of status epilepticus (SE) by the International League Against Epilepsy in 2015 included two critical time points (t1: at which the seizure should be regarded as an "abnormally prolonged seizure"; and t2: beyond which the ongoing seizure activity can pose risk of long-term consequences) to aid in diagnosis and management and highlights the importance of early treatment of SE more clearly than ever before. Although Japan has witnessed an increasing number of pre-hospital drug treatment as well as first- and second-line treatments, clinical issues have emerged regarding which drugs are appropriate. To address these clinical concerns, a revised version of the "Japanese Guidelines for the Treatment of Pediatric Status Epilepticus 2023" (GL2023) was published. For pre-hospital treatment, buccal midazolam is recommended. For in-hospital treatment, if an intravenous route is unobtainable, buccal midazolam is also recommended. If an intravenous route can be obtained, intravenous benzodiazepines such as midazolam, lorazepam, and diazepam are recommended. However, the rates of seizure cessation were reported to be the same among the three drugs, but respiratory depression was less frequent with lorazepam than with diazepam. For established SE, phenytoin/fosphenytoin and phenobarbital can be used for pediatric SE, and levetiracetam can be used in only adults in Japan. Coma therapy is recommended for refractory SE, with no recommended treatment for super-refractory SE. GL2023 lacks adequate recommendations for the treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Although electrographic seizure and electrographic SE may lead to brain damages, it remains unclear whether treatment of NCSE improves outcomes in children. We plan to address this issue in an upcoming edition of the guideline.

Ketamine Versus Midazolam as the First-Line Continuous Infusion for Status Epilepticus in Children with Cardiac Disease

BACKGROUND

The treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in children with cardiac disease is challenging given their often-tenuous hemodynamic state. We aim to determine whether ketamine is safe and effective in children with cardiac disease as the first-line continuous infusion for the treatment of refractory SE (RSE) and to compare ketamine to midazolam for the treatment of RSE in this population.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with cardiac disease and RSE admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit at a tertiary children's hospital between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2023. Consecutive patients < 18 years of age who had electroencephalogram-confirmed RSE treated with a continuous infusion of ketamine and/or midazolam were included. Clinical variables were extracted from the electronic medical record, and descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients with cardiac disease and RSE were treated with a continuous infusion: 15 were treated with ketamine first, and 19 were treated with midazolam first. An equivalent number of patients in both groups required a single infusion for seizure cessation (11 [73%] in the ketamine group and 12 [63%] in the midazolam group; p = 0.72). The median time from seizure onset to seizure cessation, time from seizure onset to initiation of a continuous infusion, time from initiation of a continuous infusion to seizure cessation, infusion duration, and recurrence of seizures during weaning of the continuous infusion were comparable between groups. There was no difference between groups in the proportion of patients who experienced potential adverse events attributable to their continuous infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective cohort study provides evidence that ketamine may be as effective as midazolam as the first-line continuous infusion for RSE in children with cardiac disease. This study also provides preliminary evidence of safety in this population, at least in comparison to midazolam.

Treatment of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus

Status epilepticus is one of the most common life-threatening neurological emergencies in childhood with the highest incidence in the first 5 years of life and high mortality and morbidity rates. Although it is known that a delayed treatment and a prolonged seizure can cause permanent brain damage, there is evidence that current treatments may be delayed and the medication doses administered are insufficient. Here, we summarize current knowledge on treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in childhood and propose a treatment algorithm. We performed a structured literature search via PubMed and ClinicalTrails.org and identified 35 prospective and retrospective studies on children <18 years comparing two and more treatment options for status epilepticus. The studies were divided into the commonly used treatment phases. As a first-line treatment, benzodiazepines buccal/rectal/intramuscular/intravenous are recommended. For status epilepticus treated with benzodiazepine refractory, no superiority of fosphenytoin, levetirazetam, or phenobarbital was identified. There is limited data on third-line treatments for refractory status epilepticus lasting >30 min. Our proposed treatment algorithm, especially for children with SE, is for in and out-of-hospital onset aids to promote the establishment and distribution of guidelines to address the treatment delay aggressively and to reduce putative permanent neuronal damage. Further studies are needed to evaluate if these algorithms decrease long-term damage and how to treat refractory status epilepticus lasting >30 min.

Clinical Features and Management of Status Epilepticus in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVES

Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in children. SE in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are not well characterized. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate the clinical features and treatment of seizures in children admitted to the PICU of our hospital.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the clinical characteristics of patients aged between 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to our hospital with SE or who were diagnosed with SE after hospitalization and were followed up with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring between January 2015 and December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients with SE, 50 (56.8%) boys and 38 (43.2%) girls, were included. The median age was 24 months (interquartile range, 12-80 months). When we evaluate the continuous electroencephalographic monitoring data, 27 (30.7%) were lateralized, 20 (22.7%) were multifocal, 30 (34.1%) were generalized, and 11 (12.5%) were bilateral independent epileptic activity. Seventy nine patients (89.8%) were evaluated as convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and 9 (10.2%) as nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM III) score and mortality of patients with NCSE were higher ( P = 0.004 and P = 0.046, respectively). Thirteen eight patients (43.1%) were diagnosed as SE, 38 patients (43.1%) as refractory SE, and 12 patients (13.6%) as super-refractory SE. The overall mortality rate was 10.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency that causes mortality and morbidity. Electroencephalographic monitoring is important for the recognition of seizures and rapid intervention. No superiority of second-line treatments or combined treatments was demonstrated in patients with SE.

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Optimized Midazolam and Pentobarbital Dosing Used in Treatment Protocols of Refractory Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVES

To model bolus dosing, infusion rate, and weaning rate on theoretical serum concentration of midazolam and pentobarbital used in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

DESIGN

One- and two-compartment in silico pharmacokinetic models of midazolam and pentobarbital.

SETTING

Not applicable.

SUBJECTS

Not applicable.

INTERVENTIONS

We compared the model variables used in midazolam and pentobarbital protocols for standard RSE.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Standard RSE treatment protocols result in steady-state serum concentrations that are 6.2-9.0-fold higher for the one-compartment model and 2.3-4.7-fold higher for the two-compartment model. In the model, not including bolus doses delays the achievement of serum steady-state concentration by 0.5 and 2.7 hours for midazolam and pentobarbital, respectively. Abrupt discontinuation of these medications reduces modeled medication exposure by 1.1 and 6.4 hours, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in silico pharmacokinetic modeling of standard midazolam and pentobarbital dosing protocols for RSE suggests potential variables to optimize in future clinical studies.

Management and prognosis of pediatric status epilepticus

Background

Pediatric status epilepticus is a neurological emergency with the potential for severe developmental and neurological consequences. Prompt diagnosis and management are necessary.

Objectives

To outline the existing best available evidence for managing pediatric and neonatal status epilepticus, in the light of emerging randomized controlled studies. We also focus on short and long-term prognoses.

Materials and methods

This is a systematic overview of the existing literature.

Results

Status epilepticus, its treatment, and prognosis are usually based on the continuation of seizure activity at 5 and 30 min. Refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus further complicates management and requires continuous EEG monitoring with regular reassessment and adjustment of therapy. Benzodiazepines have been accepted as the first line of treatment on the basis of reasonable evidence. Emerging randomized controlled trials demonstrate equal efficacy for parenterally administered phenytoin, levetiracetam, and valproic acid as second-line agents. Beyond this, the evidence for third-line options is sparse. However, encouraging evidence for midazolam and ketamine exists with further data required for immunological, dietary, and surgical interventions.

Conclusion

Our overview of the management of pediatric and neonatal status epilepticus based on available evidence emphasizes the need for evidence-based guidelines to manage status epilepticus that fails to respond to second-line treatment.

High-Dose Midazolam for Pediatric Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

We sought to describe the prevalence of midazolam treatment failure in children with refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and define a threshold dose associated with diminishing frequency of seizure cessation.

DESIGN

Single center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single-center, quaternary-care PICU.

PATIENTS

Children younger than 18 years old admitted to the PICU from 2009 to 2018 who had RSE requiring a continuous midazolam infusion.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified individuals with RSE through a data analytics inquiry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Youden's index were used to assess the midazolam dose threshold associated with the highest sensitivity and specificity in identifying seizure cessation. A logistic regression model was used to determine if there was an association between maximum midazolam dose and seizure cessation. Of the 45 patients who met inclusion criteria for this study, 27 (60%) had seizure cessation with a midazolam infusion, whereas 18 (40%) required an additional pentobarbital infusion for seizure cessation. There was an association between maximum midazolam dose and seizure cessation, with patients more likely to fail treatment when midazolam was administered at higher doses. The maximum midazolam dose displayed high area under the ROC curve value for seizure cessation, and the Youden's J index cut-off point was 525 μg/kg/hr. Treatment above this dose was associated with diminishing frequency of seizure cessation. The median time spent titrating midazolam above 500 μg/kg/hr for those patients who required pentobarbital for seizure cessation was 3.83 hours (interquartile range, 2.28-5.58 hr).

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric patients with RSE requiring high dose midazolam, considerable time is spent titrating doses in a range (above 500 µg/kg/hr) that is associated with diminishing frequency of seizure cessation.

Ketamine for Management of Neonatal and Pediatric Refractory Status Epilepticus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Few data are available regarding the use of anesthetic infusions for refractory status epilepticus (RSE) in children and neonates, and ketamine use is increasing despite limited data. We aimed to describe the impact of ketamine for RSE in children and neonates.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care units of a quaternary care children's hospital treated with ketamine infusion for RSE.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were treated with a ketamine infusion for RSE. The median age at onset of RSE was 0.7 years (interquartile range 0.15-7.2), and the cohort included 13 (19%) neonates. Three patients (4%) had adverse events requiring intervention during or within 12 hours of ketamine administration, including hypertension in 2 patients and delirium in 1 patient. Ketamine infusion was followed by seizure termination in 32 patients (46%), seizure reduction in 19 patients (28%), and no change in 18 patients (26%).

DISCUSSION

Ketamine administration was associated with few adverse events, and seizures often terminated or improved after ketamine administration. Further data are needed comparing first-line and subsequent anesthetic medications for treatment of pediatric and neonatal RSE.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence on the therapeutic utility of ketamine for treatment of RSE in children and neonates.

PICU Pharmacology

The care of the critically-ill child often includes medications used to optimize organ function, treat infections, and provide comfort. Pediatric pharmacology has some key differences that should be leveraged for safe pharmacologic management.

Early Combination Therapy of Ketamine and Midazolam in Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus in Hemodynamic Unstable State

The use of anesthetics is inevitable to suppress seizure activity in refractory status epilepticus (RSE). Hypotension, which is a critical side effect observed when treating RSE using a higher dosage of anesthetics that enhance γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) activity, often requires vasopressor agents. Concomitant treatment with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists, such as ketamine, could be effective in prolonged refractory SE, while maintaining stable blood pressure owing to the blockage of catecholamine reuptake in the systemic circulation. We report two cases of patients who had RSE with hemodynamic instability treated promptly with an early combination of ketamine and low-dose midazolam. The combination treatment effectively suppressed epileptic discharge with less hemodynamic side effects; moreover, a low dose of midazolam was required when combined with ketamine therapy. The initial combination of a third-line therapy that blocks NMDA receptors with enhanced GABAergic activity could be useful in RSE. Further studies are necessary in many variable etiologies of SE.

Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus in Children: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the pediatric super-refractory status epilepticus population by describing treatment variability in super-refractory status epilepticus patients and comparing relevant clinical characteristics, including outcomes, between super-refractory status epilepticus, and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data between June 2011 and January 2019.

SETTING

Seventeen academic hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

We included patients 1 month to 21 years old presenting with convulsive refractory status epilepticus. We defined super-refractory status epilepticus as continuous or intermittent seizures lasting greater than or equal to 24 hours following initiation of continuous infusion and divided the cohort into super-refractory status epilepticus and nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus groups.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We identified 281 patients (157 males) with a median age of 4.1 years (1.3-9.5 yr), including 31 super-refractory status epilepticus patients. Compared with nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus group, super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of first nonbenzodiazepine-antiseizure medication (149 min [55-491.5 min] vs 62 min [33.3-120.8 min]; p = 0.030) and of continuous infusion (495 min [177.5-1,255 min] vs 150 min [90-318.5 min]; p = 0.003); prolonged seizure duration (120 hr [58-368 hr] vs 3 hr [1.4-5.9 hr]; p < 0.001) and length of ICU stay (17 d [9.5-40 d] vs [1.8-8.8 d]; p < 0.001); more medical complications (18/31 [58.1%] vs 55/250 [22.2%] patients; p < 0.001); lower return to baseline function (7/31 [22.6%] vs 182/250 [73.4%] patients; p < 0.001); and higher mortality (4/31 [12.9%] vs 5/250 [2%]; p = 0.010). Within the super-refractory status epilepticus group, status epilepticus resolution was attained with a single continuous infusion in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%), two in 10 of 31 (32.3%), and three or more in six of 31 (19.4%). Most super-refractory status epilepticus patients (30/31, 96.8%) received midazolam as first choice. About 17 of 31 patients (54.8%) received additional treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Super-refractory status epilepticus patients had delayed initiation of nonbenzodiazepine antiseizure medication treatment, higher number of medical complications and mortality, and lower return to neurologic baseline than nonsuper-refractory status epilepticus patients, although these associations were not adjusted for potential confounders. Treatment approaches following the first continuous infusion were heterogeneous, reflecting limited information to guide clinical decision-making in super-refractory status epilepticus.

Time to Treatment in Pediatric Convulsive Refractory Status Epilepticus: The Weekend Effect

BACKGROUND

Time to treatment in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is delayed. We aimed to evaluate the influence of weekends and holidays on time to treatment of this pediatric emergency.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data of pediatric patients with refractory status epilepticus.

RESULTS

We included 329 patients (56% males) with a median (p25 to p75) age of 3.8 (1.3 to 9) years. The median (p25 to p75) time to first BZD on weekdays and weekends/holidays was 20 (6.8 to 48.3) minutes versus 11 (5 to 35) minutes, P = 0.01; adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 1.55), P = 0.12. The time to first non-BZD ASM was longer on weekdays than on weekends/holidays (68 [42.8 to 153.5] minutes versus 59 [27 to 120] minutes, P = 0.006; adjusted HR = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.08 to 1.76], P = 0.009). However, this difference was mainly driven by status epilepticus with in-hospital onset: among 108 patients, the time to first non-BZD ASM was longer during weekdays than during weekends/holidays (55.5 [28.8 to 103.5] minutes versus 28 [15.8 to 66.3] minutes, P = 0.003; adjusted HR = 1.65 [95% CI: 1.08 to 2.51], P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The time to first non-BZD ASM in pediatric refractory status epilepticus is shorter on weekends/holidays than on weekdays, mainly driven by in-hospital onset status epilepticus. Data on what might be causing this difference may help tailor policies to improve medication application timing.

[Paediatric Life Support]

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill or injured infants, children and adolescents before, during and after respiratory/cardiac arrest.

Refractory and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

Context

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) are neurological emergencies with considerable mortality and morbidity. In this paper, we provide an overview of causes, evaluation, treatment, and consequences of RSE and SRSE, reflecting the lack of high-quality evidence to inform therapeutic approach.

Sources

This is a narrative review based on personal practice and experience. Nevertheless, we searched MEDLINE (using PubMed and OvidSP vendors) and Cochrane central register of controlled trials, using appropriate keywords to incorporate recent evidence.

Results

Refractory status epilepticus is commonly defined as an acute convulsive seizure that fails to respond to two or more anti-seizure medications including at least one nonbenzodiazepine drug. Super-refractory status epilepticus is a status epilepticus that continues for ≥24 hours despite anesthetic treatment, or recurs on an attempted wean of the anesthetic regimen. Both can occur in patients known to have epilepsy or de novo, with increasing recognition of autoimmune and genetic causes. Electroencephalography monitoring is essential to monitor treatment response in refractory/super-refractory status epilepticus, and to diagnose non-convulsive status epilepticus. The mainstay of treatment for these disorders includes anesthetic infusions, primarily midazolam, ketamine, and pentobarbital. Dietary, immunological, and surgical treatments are viable in selected patients. Management is challenging due to multiple acute complications and long-term adverse consequences.

Conclusions

We have provided a synopsis of best practices for diagnosis and management of refractory/superrefractory status epilepticus and highlighted the lack of sufficient high-quality evidence to drive decision making, ending with a brief foray into avenues for future research.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Paediatric Life Support

These European Resuscitation Council Paediatric Life Support (PLS) guidelines, are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the management of critically ill infants and children, before, during and after cardiac arrest.

Effects of Midazolam on the Development of Adult Leydig Cells From Stem Cells In Vitro

BACKGROUND

Midazolam is a neurological drug with diverse functions, including sedation, hypnosis, decreased anxiety, anterograde amnesia, brain-mediated muscle relaxation, and anticonvulsant activity. Since it is frequently used in children and adolescents for extended periods of time, there is a risk that it may affect their pubertal development. Here, we report a potential effect of the drug on the development of Leydig cells (LCs), the testosterone (T)-producing cells in the testis.

METHODS

Stem LCs (SLCs), isolated from adult rat testes by a magnetic-activated cell sorting technique, were induced to differentiate into LCs in vitro for 3 weeks. Midazolam (0.1-30 μM) was added to the culture medium, and the effects on LC development were assayed.

RESULTS

Midazolam has dose-dependent effects on SLC differentiation. At low concentrations (0.1-5 μM), the drug can mildly increase SLC differentiation (increased T production), while at higher concentrations (15-30 μM), it inhibits LC development (decreased T production). T increases at lower levels may be due to upregulations of scavenger receptor class b Member 1 (SCARB1) and cytochrome P450 17A1 (CYP17A1), while T reductions at higher levels of midazolam could be due to changes in multiple steroidogenic proteins. The uneven changes in steroidogenic pathway proteins, especially reductions in CYP17A1 at high midazolam levels, also result in an accumulation of progesterone. In addition to changes in T, increases in progesterone could have additional impacts on male reproduction. The loss in steroidogenic proteins at high midazolam levels may be mediated in part by the inactivation of protein kinase B/cAMP response element-binding protein (AKT/CREB) signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

Midazolam has the potential to affect adult Leydig cell (ALC) development at concentrations comparable with the blood serum levels in human patients. Further studies are needed to test the effects on human cells.

Status Epilepticus-Work-Up and Management in Children

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies in children and has a mortality of 2 to 4%. Admissions for SE are very resource-consuming, especially in refractory and super-refractory SE. An increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SE leaves room for improving SE treatment protocols, including medication choice and timing. Selecting the most efficacious medications and giving them in a timely manner may improve outcomes. Benzodiazepines are commonly used as first line and they can be used in the prehospital setting, where most SE episodes begin. The diagnostic work-up should start simultaneously to initial treatment, or as soon as possible, to detect potentially treatable causes of SE. Although most etiologies are recognized after the first evaluation, the detection of more unusual causes may become challenging in selected cases. SE is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt and efficacious treatment may improve outcomes. We provide a summary of existing evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the work-up and treatment of SE in pediatric patients.

Epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a life-threatening neurologic emergency, which is defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) as bilateral tonic-clonic seizure activity lasting longer than 5 min, while absence status epilepticus (SE) and focal SE are specified as exceeding 10 min. Epidemiological evidence on SE is currently lacking, and the incidence is not well-known, especially in light of changes in the ILAE criteria for SE. The objectives of this systematic literature review were to describe the epidemiology of SE in the US population and the associated burden of illness.

METHODS

A systematic review, including literature and pragmatic searches, was conducted. Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, and Web of Science electronic databases from inception to February 2019. Pragmatic searches of the gray literature were carried out using Google, Google Scholar, conference proceedings, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify additional sources. Only US-based studies or multinational studies reporting US data of interest were included.

RESULTS

In total, 69 sources were identified. The incidence of all SE in patients of all ages in the USA ranged from 18.3 to 41 per 100,000 people per year. Incidence of all-age CSE rose from 3.5 (1979) to 12.5 (2010) per 100,000 people per year. Status epilepticus incidence followed a bimodal (U-shaped) distribution, with the highest estimates in the first years of life (0-4 years) and after 60 years. Mortality associated with SE varied from 21% over 30 days to 31.2% over 10 years. For CSE, two studies reported similar in-hospital mortalities (9.2% and 10.7%). Median healthcare costs related to SE admission were approximately US$14,500 per adult (17-45 years) and US$8000 per child (0-16 years).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of recent data on the epidemiology and healthcare burden associated with SE. Reports of SE incidence in the USA are highly variable and predate the 2015 ILAE definition of SE. However, the available data suggest a high burden of illness.

Assessment of midazolam pharmacokinetics in the treatment of status epilepticus

OBJECTIVES

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is often treated with midazolam boluses and continuous infusions, but there is considerable variability in dosing and efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the performance of a clinical midazolam dose escalation pathway for the treatment of pediatric RSE that was designed based on a novel midazolam pharmacokinetic model.

DESIGN

Prospective pharmacokinetic study of midazolam bolus and escalation of continuous midazolam infusion.

SETTING

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in quaternary-care academic hospital.

SUBJECTS

Children between two months to seventeen years of age who received clinically-indicated midazolam infusion for treatment of RSE.

INTERVENTION

Blood sampled at regular intervals during treatment. Main study outcome measure was the accuracy of a pharmacokinetic model to predict serum midazolam concentrations.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We analysed data from six subjects. Three subjects had serum midazolam concentrations close to those predicted by our initial model (accuracy 88.9-170.2 %) which incorporates body weight, hepatic function, and renal function. For the other three subjects, all of whom were receiving pre-existing chronic benzodiazepine therapy prior to the RSE episode, the model grossly overestimated serum concentrations (predictive error 420.3-722.5 %). Once the model was corrected for the impact of pre-existing chronic benzodiazepine use on clearance, predicted concentrations more closely reflected those measured in subjects.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated a clinical midazolam RSE treatment pathway but discovered that the model on which the pathway was based was not accurate for all patients. We therefore developed a novel pharmacokinetic midazolam model in children with RSE treated with continuous midazolam infusion. This model incorporates body weight, hepatic and renal function, and importantly, a correction factor for pre-existing chronic benzodiazepine use. Once validated, this model may guide dosing and drive the development of more effective treatment pathways for continuous midazolam in RSE.

Status Epilepticus in Children

For various reasons, status epilepticus in children is different than in adults. Pediatric specificities include status epilepticus epidemiology, underlying etiologies, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment options. Relevant data from the literature are presented for each of them, and questions remaining open for future studies on status epilepticus in childhood are listed.

Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee

Purpose:

Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of morbidity and death. For patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (CRSE), we sought to determine the strength of evidence for 8 parenteral ASMs used as third-line treatment in stopping clinical CRSE.

Methods:

A structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies on the treatment of CRSE in children and adults using IV brivaracetam, ketamine, lacosamide, levetiracetam (LEV), midazolam (MDZ), pentobarbital (PTB; and thiopental), propofol (PRO), and valproic acid (VPA). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine were added to determine the effectiveness in treating hard-to-control seizures in special circumstances. Studies were evaluated by predefined criteria and were classified by strength of evidence in stopping clinical CRSE (either as the last ASM added or compared to another ASM) according to the 2017 American Academy of Neurology process.

Results:

No studies exist on the use of ACTH, corticosteroids, or IVIg for the treatment of CRSE. Small series and case reports exist on the use of these agents in the treatment of RSE of suspected immune etiology, severe epileptic encephalopathies, and rare epilepsy syndromes. For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of brivaracetam (level U; 4 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of ketamine (level U; 25 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, it is possible that lacosamide is effective at stopping RSE (level C; 2 class III, 14 class IV studies). For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that LEV and VPA are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support the effectiveness of LEV (level U; 2 class IV studies). Magnesium sulfate may be effective in the treatment of eclampsia, but there are only case reports of its use for CRSE. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ and diazepam infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that MDZ infusion and PTB are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ infusion and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that low-dose and high-dose MDZ infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that MDZ is effective as the last drug added (level U; 29 class IV studies). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults and children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB is effective as the last ASM added (level U; 42 class IV studies). For CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PRO is effective as the last ASM used (level U; 26 class IV studies). No pediatric-only studies exist on the use of PRO for CRSE, and many guidelines do not recommend its use in children aged <16 years. Pyridoxine-dependent and pyridoxine-responsive epilepsies should be considered in children presenting between birth and age 3 years with refractory seizures and no imaging lesion or other acquired cause of seizures. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that VPA and diazepam infusion are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). No class I to III studies have been reported in adults treated with VPA for CRSE. In comparison, for children and adults with established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), after an initial benzodiazepine, it is likely that loading doses of LEV 60 mg/kg, VPA 40 mg/kg, and fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg are equally effective at stopping SE (level B, 1 class I study).

Conclusions:

Mostly insufficient evidence exists on the efficacy of stopping clinical CRSE using brivaracetam, lacosamide, LEV, valproate, ketamine, MDZ, PTB, and PRO either as the last ASM or compared to others of these drugs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, IVIg, corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine have been used in special situations but have not been studied for CRSE. For the treatment of established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), LEV, VPA, and fosphenytoin are likely equally effective, but whether this is also true for CRSE is unknown. Triple-masked, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of parenteral anesthetizing and nonanesthetizing ASMs in the treatment of CRSE.

Association of guideline publication and delays to treatment in pediatric status epilepticus

Objective

To determine whether publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment shortens time to treatment in pediatric refractory convulsive status epilepticus (rSE), we compared time to treatment before (2011–2014) and after (2015–2019) publication of evidence of delays in treatment of rSE in the Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group (pSERG) as assessed by patient interviews and record review.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected dataset from June 2011 to September 2019 on pediatric patients (1 month–21 years of age) with rSE.

Results

We studied 328 patients (56% male) with median (25th–75th percentile [p₂₅–p₇₅]) age of 3.8 (1.3–9.4) years. There were no differences in the median (p₂₅–p₇₅) time to first benzodiazepine (BZD) (20 [5–52.5] vs 15 [5–38] minutes, p = 0.3919), time to first non-BZD antiseizure medication (68 [34.5–163.5] vs 65 [33–142] minutes, p = 0.7328), and time to first continuous infusion (186 [124.2–571] vs 160 [89.5–495] minutes, p = 0.2236). Among 157 patients with out-of-hospital onset whose time to hospital arrival was available, the proportion who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival increased after publication of evidence of delays (41 of 81 [50.6%] vs 57 of 76 [75%], p = 0.0018), and the odds ratio (OR) was also increased in multivariable logistic regression (OR 4.35 [95% confidence interval 1.96–10.3], p = 0.0005).

Conclusion

Publication of evidence on delays in time to treatment was not associated with improvements in time to treatment of rSE, although it was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients who received at least 1 BZD before hospital arrival.

Thiamylal anaesthetic therapy for febrile refractory status epilepticus in children

PURPOSE

To evaluate barbiturate anaesthetic therapy using thiamylal for febrile refractory status epilepticus (fRSE) in children.

METHODS

This was a review of a prospectively-collected database between April 2012-March 2016 for fRSE cases treated with thiamylal anaesthetic therapy in a single paediatric hospital in Japan. The sample comprised 23 children (median age, 23 months) with fRSE that underwent thiamylal anaesthetic therapy for convulsive seizures lasting longer than 60 min, sustained after intravenous administration of benzodiazepine and non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants. The intervention comprised protocol-based thiamylal anaesthetic therapy with bolus administration. We measured the dose and time required to achieve the burst suppression pattern (BSP) on electroencephalography, seizure recurrence, death, neurological sequelae, and complications.

RESULTS

All patients except one reached the BSP. The thiamylal median dose until reaching the BSP was 27.5 mg/kg, and the median time from thiamylal administration to reaching the BSP was 109.5 min. There was one case of immediate treatment failure and one of withdrawal seizure, but no breakthrough seizure. No deaths occurred during treatment, and neurological sequelae occurred in four cases (17%). Vasopressors were administered in all cases. Other complications included 11 cases of pneumonia and one of enterocolitis.

CONCLUSION

We revealed the time and dose required to reach the BSP with thiamylal anaesthetic therapy using bolus administration in children. Our results suggested that reaching the BSP with bolus administration requires markedly less time than without bolus administration, rarely causes seizure recurrence in paediatric fRSE, and causes haemodynamic dysfunction and infections as often as observed without bolus administration.

Select topics in the management of critically ill children

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review article is to discuss considerations for the critically ill child presenting to an emergency department (ED) with pharmacists who have minimal to no pediatric training.

SUMMARY

In 2015, 17% of all children visited an ED, constituting 30 million visits. The majority of these children were treated at community hospitals where pediatric care resources, including a pediatric-trained pharmacist, may be limited. Because of the complex array of ages and disease states, the care of critically ill children in the ED creates many concerns for adult and community hospitals. This article will focus on several common disease states seen in the pediatric ED, including septic shock, trauma, status epilepticus, and diabetic ketoacidosis.

CONCLUSION

Critically ill children admitted to a community or adult ED provide therapeutic dilemmas and medication safety concerns. A pharmacist with training or experience in pediatrics can have a major impact in patient outcomes in many of the disease states seen in these pediatric patients. This article highlights several key differences between critically ill pediatric and adult patients to better prepare all pharmacists to care for these vulnerable patients.

Pharmacotherapy for Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus

Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is one of the most common pediatric neurological emergencies. Ongoing seizure activity is a dynamic process and may be associated with progressive impairment of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated inhibition due to rapid internalization of GABA_A receptors. Further hyperexcitability may be caused by AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) receptors moving from subsynaptic sites to the synaptic membrane. Receptor trafficking during prolonged seizures may contribute to difficulties treating seizures of longer duration and may provide some of the pathophysiological underpinnings of established and refractory SE (RSE). Simultaneously, a practice change toward more rapid initiation of first-line benzodiazepine (BZD) treatment and faster escalation to second-line non-BZD treatment for established SE is in progress. Early administration of the recommended BZD dose is suggested. For second-line treatment, non-BZD anti-seizure medications (ASMs) include valproate, fosphenytoin, or levetiracetam, among others, and at this point there is no clear evidence that any one of these options is better than the others. If seizures continue after second-line ASMs, RSE is manifested. RSE treatment consists of bolus doses and titration of continuous infusions under continuous electro-encephalography (EEG) guidance until electrographic seizure cessation or burst-suppression. Ultimately, etiological workup and related treatment of CSE, including broad spectrum immunotherapies as clinically indicated, is crucial. A potential therapeutic approach for future studies may entail consideration of interventions that may accelerate diagnosis and treatment of SE, as well as rational and early polytherapy based on synergism between ASMs by utilizing medications targeting different mechanisms of epileptogenesis and epileptogenicity.

Course and Outcome of Children with Convulsive Status Epilepticus Admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Introduction The objective of this study was to describe the course and the outcomes of children with convulsive status epilepticus and to evaluate the differences between two groups of children with new-onset seizures and known seizure disorders. Methods This is a retrospective, single-center study. Children with convulsive status epilepticus admitted to our tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit were included in the study. Medical records were reviewed to obtain the demographic- and seizure-related variables. Results Among 139 children with status epilepticus, 69.7% (n = 99) had a known seizure disorder. Focal seizures were present in 23.9% of children, and 34.6% required intubation; there was an overall mortality rate of 1.2%. The children with new-onset seizures were younger and received electroencephalography (EEG) and neuroimaging more often compared to children with known seizure disorders (p < 0.05). However, an abnormal EEG was more common among children with known seizure disorders (p < 0.001). Conclusions Sub-therapeutic anti-epileptic drugs levels were common among children with known seizure disorders presenting with status epilepticus. Gender, race, insurance status, type of seizures, intubation requirement, lengths of stay, and mortality were not significantly different between the two groups.

Antiseizure medications in critical care: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Seizures and status epilepticus are very common diagnoses in the critically ill patient and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is an abundance of research on the utility of antiseizure medications in this setting, but limited randomized-controlled trials to guide the selection of medications in these patients. This review examines the current guidelines and treatment strategies for status epilepticus and provides an update on newer antiseizure medications in the critical care settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Time is brain applies to status epilepticus, with delays in treatment corresponding with worsened outcomes. Establishing standardized treatment protocols within a health system, including prehospital treatment, may lead to improved outcomes. Once refractory status epilepticus is established, continuous deep sedation with intravenous anesthetic agents should be effective. In cases, which prove highly refractory, novel approaches should be considered, with recent data suggesting multiple recently approved antiseizure medications, appropriate therapeutic options, as well as novel approaches to upregulate extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid channels with brexanolone.

SUMMARY

Although there are many new treatments to consider for seizures and status epilepticus in the critically ill patient, the most important predictor of outcome may be rapid diagnosis and treatment. There are multiple new and established medications that can be considered in the treatment of these patients once status epilepticus has become refractory, and a multidrug regimen will often be necessary.

Taurine potentiates the anticonvulsive effect of the GABAA agonist muscimol and pentobarbital in the immature mouse hippocampus

OBJECTIVE

The high incidence of epileptic seizures in neonates and their frequent refractoriness to pharmacologic therapies require identification of new therapeutical options. Therefore, we investigated whether the modulatory effect of taurine on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)_A receptors can enhance the anticonvulsive potential of the GABA_A receptor agonist muscimol and of the barbiturate pentobarbital.

METHODS

We performed field potential recordings in in toto hippocampus preparations of immature (postnatal days 4-7) C57Bl/6 mouse pups. Spontaneous epileptiform activity was induced by the continuous presence of the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine and the glycinergic antagonist strychnine in Mg²⁺ -free solutions.

RESULTS

Bath application of 0.1 μmol/L muscimol increases the occurrence of recurrent epileptiform discharges, whereas they are significantly attenuated in a dose-dependent manner by muscimol in concentrations between 0.5 and 5 μmol/L. Taurine at concentrations between 0.1 and 0.5 mmol/L induces a proconvulsive effect, but upon coapplication, it significantly augments the anticonvulsive effect of moderate muscimol doses (0.5-1 μmol/L). In addition, the anticonvulsive effect of 100 and 200 μmol/L pentobarbital is increased significantly in the presence of 0.5 μmol/L taurine.

SIGNIFICANCE

These observations demonstrate that taurine can indeed enhance the anticonvulsive effects of muscimol and pentobarbital, suggesting that taurine may act as a positive modulator on GABA_A receptors. Thus, interfering with the modulatory taurine binding site of GABA_A receptors or the interstitial taurine concentration may provide new therapeutical options for anticonvulsive therapies in neonates.

Hospital Emergency Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus: Comparison of Pathways From Ten Pediatric Research Centers

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate and compare the status epilepticus treatment pathways used by pediatric status epilepticus research group (pSERG) hospitals in the United States and the American Epilepsy Society (AES) status epilepticus guideline.

METHODS

We undertook a descriptive analysis of recommended timing, dosing, and medication choices in 10 pSERG hospitals' status epilepticus treatment pathways.

RESULTS

One pathway matched the timeline in the AES guideline; nine pathways described more rapid timings. All pathways matched the guideline's stabilization phase in timing and five suggested that first-line benzodiazepine (BZD) be administered within this period. For second-line therapy timing (initiation of a non-BZD antiepileptic drug within 20 to 40 minutes), one pathway matched the guideline; nine initiated the antiepileptic drug earlier (median 10 [range five to 15] minutes). Third-line therapy timings matched the AES guideline (40 minutes) in two pathways; eight suggested earlier timing (median 20 [range 15 to 30] minutes). The first-line BZD recommended in all hospitals was intravenous lorazepam; alternatives included intramuscular midazolam or rectal diazepam. In second-line therapy, nine pathways recommended fosphenytoin. For third-line therapy, eight pathways recommended additional boluses of second-line medications; most commonly phenobarbital. Two pathways suggested escalation to third-line medication; most commonly midazolam. We found variance in dosing for the following medications: midazolam as first-line therapy, fosphenytoin, and levetiracetam as second-line therapy, and phenobarbital as third-line therapy medications.

CONCLUSIONS

The pSERG hospitals status epilepticus pathways are consistent with the AES status epilepticus guideline in regard to the choice of medications, but generally recommend more rapid escalation in therapy than the guideline.

Novel drugs and early polypharmacotherapy in status epilepticus

PURPOSE

Rescue medications for status epilepticus (SE) have a relatively high rate of failure. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence for the efficacy of novel drugs and early polypharmacotherapy for SE.

METHOD

Literature review.

RESULTS

New drugs and treatment strategies aim to target the pathophysiology of SE in order to improve seizure control and outcomes. Changes at the synapse level during SE include a progressive decrease in synaptic GABA_A receptors and increase in synaptic NMDA receptors. These changes tend to promote self-sustaining seizures. Current SE guidelines recommend a rapid stepwise treatment using benzodiazepines in monotherapy as the first-line treatment, targeting GABA_A synaptic receptors. Novel treatment approaches target GABA_A synaptic and extrasynaptic receptors with allopregnanolone, and NMDA receptors with ketamine. Novel rescue treatments used for SE include topiramate, brivaracetam, and perampanel, which are already marketed in epilepsy. Some available drugs not marketed for use in epilepsy have been used in the treatment of SE, and other agents are being studied for this purpose. Early polytherapy, most frequently combining a benzodiazepine with a second-line drug or an NMDA receptor antagonist, might potentially increase seizure control with relatively minor increase in side effects. Although many preclinical studies support novel drugs and early polytherapy in SE, human studies are scarce and inconclusive. Currently, evidence is lacking to recommend specific combinations of these new agents.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel drugs and strategies target the underlying pathophysiology of SE with the intent to improve seizure control and outcomes.

Emergency Neurological Life Support: Status Epilepticus

Patients with prolonged or rapidly recurring convulsions lasting more than 5 min should be considered to be in status epilepticus (SE) and receive immediate resuscitation. Although there are few randomized clinical trials, available evidence and experience suggest that early and aggressive treatment of SE improves patient outcomes, for which reason this was chosen as an Emergency Neurological Life Support protocol. The current approach to the emergency treatment of SE emphasizes rapid initiation of adequate doses of first line therapy, as well as accelerated second line anticonvulsant drugs and induced coma when these fail, coupled with admission to a unit capable of neurological critical care and electroencephalography monitoring. This protocol will focus on the initial treatment of SE but also review subsequent steps in the protocol once the patient is hospitalized.

Pediatric refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus

PURPOSE

To summarize the available evidence related to pediatric refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), with emphasis on epidemiology, etiologies, therapeutic approaches, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Narrative review of the medical literature using MEDLINE database.

RESULTS

RSE is defined as status epilepticus (SE) that fails to respond to adequately used first- and second-line antiepileptic drugs. SRSE occurs when SE persist for 24 h or more after administration of anesthesia, or recurs after its withdrawal. RSE and SRSE represent complex neurological emergencies associated with long-term neurological dysfunction and high mortality. Challenges in management arise as the underlying etiology is not always promptly recognized and therapeutic options become limited with prolonged seizures. Treatment decisions mainly rely on case series or experts' opinions. The comparative effectiveness of different treatment strategies has not been evaluated in large prospective series or randomized clinical trials. Continuous infusion of anesthetic agents is the most common treatment for RSE and SRSE, although many questions on optimal dosing and rate of administration remain unanswered. The use of non-pharmacological therapies is documented in case series or reports with low level of evidence. In addition to neurological complications resulting from prolonged seizures, children with RSE/SRSE often develop systemic complications associated with polypharmacy and prolonged hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

RSE and SRSE are neurological emergencies with limited therapeutic options. Multi-national collaborative efforts are desirable to evaluate the safety and efficacy of current RSE/SRSE therapies, and potentially impact patients' outcomes.

Management protocols for status epilepticus in the pediatric emergency room: systematic review article

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review of national or regional guidelines published in English aimed to better understand variance in pre-hospital and emergency department treatment of status epilepticus.

SOURCES

Systematic search of national or regional guidelines (January 2000 to February 2017) contained within PubMed and Google Scholar databases, and article reference lists. The search keywords were status epilepticus, prolonged seizure, treatment, and guideline.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

356 articles were retrieved and 13 were selected according to the inclusion criteria. In all six pre-hospital guidelines, the preferred route of medication administration was to use alternatives to the intravenous route: all recommended buccal and intranasal midazolam; three also recommended intramuscular midazolam, and five recommended using rectal diazepam. All 11 emergency department guidelines described three phases in therapy. Intravenous medication, by phase, was indicated as such: initial phase - ten/11 guidelines recommended lorazepam, and eight/11 recommended diazepam; second phase - most (ten/11) guidelines recommended phenytoin, but other options were phenobarbital (nine/11), valproic acid (six/11), and either fosphenytoin or levetiracetam (each four/11); third phase - four/11 guidelines included the choice of repeating second phase therapy, whereas the other guidelines recommended using a variety of intravenous anesthetic agents (thiopental, midazolam, propofol, and pentobarbital).

CONCLUSIONS

All of the guidelines share a similar framework for management of status epilepticus. The choice in route of administration and drug type varied across guidelines. Hence, the adoption of a particular guideline should take account of local practice options in health service delivery.

Neurologic Outcomes Following Care in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Purpose of review

With increasing survival of children requiring admission to pediatric intensive care units (PICU), neurodevelopmental outcomes of these patients are an area of increased attention. Our goal was to systematically review recently published literature on neurologic outcomes of PICU patients.

Recent Findings

Decline in neurofunctional status occurs in 3%-20% of children requiring PICU care. This proportion varies based on primary diagnosis and severity of illness, with children admitted for primary neurologic diagnosis, children who suffer cardiac arrest or who require invasive interventions during the PICU admission, having worse outcomes. Recent research focuses on early identification and treatment of modifiable risk factors for unfavorable outcomes, and on long-term follow-up that moves beyond global cognitive outcomes and is increasingly including tests assessing multidimensional aspects of neurodevelopment.

Summary

The pediatric critical care research community has shifted focus from survival to survival with favorable neurologic outcomes of children admitted to the PICU.