Pediatric organ donation: what factors most influence parents' donation decisions?

Pediatric Organ Donation, Transplantation, and Updated Brain Death Criteria: An Overview for Pediatricians

Pediatricians follow patients longitudinally and hold a unique position to address multiple issues, medical and psychosocial, that affect organ donation and transplantation. They are wellpositioned to provide anticipatory guidance during well-child visits and during care for children with end-stage organ failure and can either assist these patients with ongoing medical management or refer these patients for organ transplantation assessment. A pediatrician's trusted relationship with families and patients allows for guidance on medical and ethical issues surrounding brain death, organ donation, and transplantation. A clear understanding of end-of-life care, criteria for the determination of neurologic and circulatory death, the process of organ donation, and posttransplant management is vital for pediatricians. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recognizes and supports the important role of the pediatrician in the global need for organ donation and transplantation awareness. This article, as well as the updated AAP policy on Pediatric Organ Donation and Transplantation and the revised American Academy of Neurology consensus statement for the determination of neurologic death for children and adults, provides guidance to help shape public opinion, public policy, and care of the pediatric organ donor and the transplant recipient.

Pediatric Death and Family Organ Donation: Bereavement Support Services in One Pediatric Health System

Health care providers need to support families and provide resources when facing their child's death and potential organ donation. Aims of this retrospective chart review in a tertiary health care system were: (1) describe characteristics of pediatric organ donors compared to those who were not; (2) determine differences between services utilized by families who selected organ donation versus those who did not. From 2017 to 2023 of 288 pediatric deaths, 76 were organ donors and 212 did not donate. Organ donors' mean age at admission was 6.3 ± 5.8 years. Thirty-four (44.7%) participated in Honor Walks. Significant differences existed between organ donors and non-organ donors in patients who were diagnosed with SIDS (3.9% vs 13.2%; P = .025). This study provides additional data to help further our understanding of bereavement support services for families making difficult decisions regarding organ donation.

Paediatric organ donation following neurological determinants of death in intensive care units in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to assess the performance of paediatric organ donation in intensive care units following neurological determinants of death in Saudi Arabia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Paediatric intensive care units at three tertiary centres over 5 years.

PARTICIPANTS

423 paediatric deaths (<14 years) from January 2017 to December 2021.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Patients were identified as either possible, potential, eligible, approached, consented or actual donors based on organ donation definitions from the WHO, Transplantation Society and UK potential donor audit.

SECONDARY OUTCOME

Secondary outcome was causative mechanisms of brain injury in possible donors. Demographics of the study cohort (age, sex, hospital length of stay (LOS), paediatric intensive care unit LOS, pre-existing comorbidities, admission type and diagnosis category) were compared between possible and non-possible donors. Demographics were also compared between patients who underwent neurological determination of death and patients who did not.

RESULTS

Among the 423 paediatric deaths, 125 (29.6%) were identified as possible donors by neurological criteria (devastating brain insult with likelihood of brain death, Glasgow Coma Score of 3 and ≥2 absent brainstem reflexes). Of them, 41 (32.8%) patients were identified as potential donors (neurological determination of death examinations initiated by the treating team), while only two became actual donors. The eligible death conversion rate was 6.9%. The reporting rate to organ procurement organisation was 70.7% with a consent rate of 8.3%. The most common causes of brain insult causing death were cardiac arrest (44 of 125 patients, 35.2%), followed by traumatic brain injury and drowning (31 of 125 patients, 24.8%), and intracranial bleeding (13 of 125 patients, 11.4%).

CONCLUSION

Major contributors to low actual donation rate were consent, donor identification and donor referral.

Use of Kidneys from Anencephalic Donors to Offset Organ Shortage

Background: It is well recognized that patient survival and quality of life are superior with renal transplantation than with dialysis. Organ availability is far outweighed by the large number of wait-listed patients. Additional stratagems are sought to expand the donor pool, and kidneys from anencephalic infants can be considered a source of organs, until now unexplored. We plan to assess the feasibility of using the kidneys from anencephalic infants for transplantation. Material and Methods: Information about anencephaly, the characteristics of the infant kidneys, the ethical, social and medico-legal aspects raised by the use of these kidneys, their procurement and their transplantation are reviewed. Conclusions: En bloc kidney transplants from infants can provide long-term normal renal function after an accelerated catch up growth. They are not subjected to hyperfiltration since they have a full complement of nephrons. They can be transplanted using the techniques currently available.

Exploring Ethical Dimensions of Physician Involvement in Requests for Organ Donation in Pediatric Brain Death

Pediatric organ transplantation remains a life-saving therapy, with donated organs being absolutely scarce resources. Efforts to both increase pediatric organ donation authorization by families of children declared dead by neurologic criteria and mitigate perception of conflicts of interest have resulted in frequent exclusion of physicians from this process. This article provides of focused review of pediatric organ donation in the setting of brain death, explores the breadth of consequences of physician exclusion in donation authorization requests, and provides an ethical framework defending physician involvement in the organ donation process for this patient population.

Standing on Both Sides: Analysis of a Transplant Coordinator's Ethical Position Between the Recipient and the Donor's Family

BACKGROUND

When an organ is harvested from a deceased donor, how should transplant coordinators handle the issue of contact between the donor's family and the organ recipient?

METHODS

The authors-qualified both by their own considerable practical experience and theoretical investigation-discussed various aspects of the problem, relating to the bioethical issues as well as the practical dilemmas that must be clarified and decided.

RESULTS

They proposed a strategy whereby transplant coordinators can analyze their own philosophical attitude toward the issue and respond accordingly in their work to the needs and preferences of both parties.

CONCLUSIONS

The professionals handling the transplant process need training tailored to the bioethical issues relevant to the challenges they are likely to confront. This training must consist not only of theoretical and ethical guidance but also simulations designed to clarify the clinician's own personal belief system and raise awareness and self-reflection of their own biases.

The influence of socioeconomic factors on deceased organ donation in Iran

Background

There is a large gap between the number of patients on organ waiting lists and the number of available organs for donation. This study investigated the socioeconomic factors in Iran that influenced decisions for organ donation among the families of brain-dead donors.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed among the families of 333 organ donors in Iran. Two trained researchers interviewed family members about the donor’s age, sex, cause of brain death, education level, marital status, number of children, history of addiction, the financial status of the donor’s family, and reasons for which they considered refusing organ donation.

Results

The mean age of the donors was 37.23±16.59 years. During 2017–2019, significant differences were found according to income (P<0.001), marital status (P<0.001), sex (P=0.04), and occupation (P=0.04). More than half of the organ donors were of low socioeconomic status, and nearly half were the sole income earners of large families. Trauma was the most common cause of death (44.6%). The most common reasons for which the families considered refusing organ donation were unfamiliarity with the concept of brain death, denial, and the expectation of a miracle.

Conclusions

The donor’s socioeconomic status and availability of social services, such as insurance coverage, psychological services, and mourning therapy courses, play an important role in organ donation. Adequate support for the deceased’s family after organ donation is imperative.

Family refusal of eye tissue donation from potential solid organ donors: a retrospective analysis of summary and free-text data from the UK National Health Service Blood and Transplant Services (NHS-BT) National Referral Centre (1 April 2014 to 31 March 2017)

OBJECTIVES

Long-standing undersupply of eye tissue exists both in the UK and globally, and the UK National Health Service Blood and Transplant Service (NHSBT) has called for further research exploring barriers to eye donation. This study aims to: (1) describe reported reasons for non-donation of eye tissue from solid organ donors in the UK between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2017 and (2) discuss these findings with respect to existing theories relating to non-donation of eyes by family members.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a national primary data set of recorded reasons for non-donation of eyes from 2790 potential solid organ donors. Data analysis including descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis of free-text data for 126 recorded cases of family decline of eye donation.

SETTING

National data set covering solid organ donation (secondary care).

PARTICIPANTS

2790 potential organ donors were assessed for eye donation eligibility between 1 April 2014 and 31 March 2017.

RESULTS

Reasons for non-retrieval of eyes were recorded as: family wishes (n=1339, 48% of total cases); medical reasons (n=841, 30%); deceased wishes (n=180, 7%). In >50% of recorded cases, reasons for non-donation were based on family's knowledge of the deceased wishes, their perception of the deceased wishes and specific concerns regarding processes or effects of eye donation (for the deceased body). Findings are discussed with respect to the existing theoretical perspectives.

CONCLUSION

Eye donation involves distinct psychological and sociocultural factors for families and HCPs that have not been fully explored in research or integrated into service design. We propose areas for future research and service development including potential of only retrieving corneal discs as opposed to full eyes to reduce disfigurement concerns; public education regarding donation processes; exploration of how request processes potentially influence acceptance of eye donation; procedures for assessment of familial responses to information provided during consent conversations.

[... because We Should not Forget! Neonatal Organ Donation]

Obwohl sich fast 40% aller Todesfälle im Kindes- und Jugendalter während der Neugeborenenperiode ereignen, kommt es in der Neonatologie nur selten zur Organspende. Wir berichten über ein Neugeborenes, bei dem nach perinataler Asphyxie der endgültige, nicht behebbare Ausfall der Gesamtfunktion des Großhirns, des Kleinhirns und des Hirnstamms ("Hirntod") gemäß Transplantationsgesetz diagnostiziert wurde. Das Herz wurde nach der sogenannten zweiten richtliniengemäßen "Hirntoddiagnostik" zur Organspende entnommen und erfolgreich transplantiert. Besondere juristische Herausforderungen ergaben sich aus dem Umstand der anonymen Geburt, den notwendigen Regelungen der Vormundschaft sowie der Zuordnung des Totenfürsorgerechts. Medizinisch standen die speziellen Regelungen der Diagnostik des irreversiblen Hirnfunktionsausfalls bei Neugeborenen und der optimale Erhalt der Organfunktion vor Entnahme im Vordergrund. Für die Pflegenden stellte sich der Ablauf grundlegend anders dar als bei einer Therapiezieländerung mit anschließender palliativen Versorgung in Anwesenheit der Eltern. Angesichts der großen emotionalen Herausforderungen erwiesen sich die Einbindung aller Beteiligten in die Entscheidungsabläufe und die Übernahme der besonderen Verantwortung als hilfreich.Although almost 40% of all deaths prior to 18 years of age occur within the neonatal period, organ donation is rare in neonatology. Herein we report about a newborn infant with perinatal asphyxia and permanent, irreversible loss of brain function (cerebrum, cerebellum and brain stem), managed according to the criteria and instructions defined by the German law of donor organ transplantation. After confirmation of irreversible loss of brain function, the heart was successfully transplanted. Specific legal challenges resulted from the instance of an anonymous birth, the guardianship required, and the specific regulations of welfare of the deceased individual. The most prominent medical challenges consisted in the specific regulatory purposes for the diagnosis of the irreversible loss of brain function in neonates and the optimal maintenance of organ functions prior to donation. From the nursing point of view, the proceeding differed entirely compared to redirection of care into palliation while parents are present. Involving all stakeholders in every step of decision making was regarded as emotionally helpful.

Emergency medical staffs' knowledge and attitude about organ donation after circulatory determined death (DCD) and its related factors

BACKGROUND

Adverse attitudes and insufficient knowledge about organ donation after Circulatory Determined Death (DCD) among emergency staff can have important consequences for the proper identification of potential DCD donors. This is aided by the constant application of donation after Circulatory Determined Death policies, and the relative strength of support for this type of donation. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the awareness and attitude of emergency personnel about organ donation after Circulatory Determined Death.

METHODS

This descriptive study was carried out with the participation of 49 physicians and 145 nurses working in the emergency departments of educational and medical centers of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. Nurses were selected by simple random sampling, and all physicians working in the emergency departments were included in the study. The questionnaire of Knowledge and Attitude regarding Organ Donation after Circulatory Determined Death designed by Rodrigue et al. was used. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, and chi-square test.

RESULTS

Most of the nurses (62.8%) and physicians (66.7%) had a high level of knowledge about organ donation after circulatory determined death. The mean attitude score was 101.84 (SD: 9.88) out of 170 for nurses and 106.53 (SD: 11.77) for physicians. Physicians who carried organ donation cards had a more positive attitude toward organ donation after circulatory determined death.

CONCLUSION

According to this study findings, knowledge and attitude of the emergency staff about organ donation was both high and positive. It is recommended to devise necessary guidelines for organ donation in Iranian emergency departments to assist in the training of colleagues in organ donation ensuring no necessary measures are missed. The results of this study would support the development of guidelines for the successful introduction of DCD in Iran.

Predictors of Deceased Organ Donation in the Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND

A shortage of donor organs represents the major barrier to the success of solid organ transplantation. This is especially true in the pediatric population for which the number of organ donors has decreased over time. With this study, we aimed to assess the factors associated with deceased organ donor consent in the pediatric population and determine the variability in consent rates across organ procurement organizations (OPOs).

METHODS

All eligible pediatric deaths were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2008-2019). The rate of organ donor consent was determined, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the factors independently associated with successful donor recruitment. The probability of donor consent was determined for each OPO after adjusting for patient demographics.

RESULTS

A total of 11 829 eligible pediatric deaths were approached to request consent for organ donation. Consent was successful in 8816 (74.5%) subjects. Consent rates are lower in the pediatric population compared with young adults and are directly related to patient age such that eligible infant deaths have the lowest rate of successful donor consent. There is significant variability in donor consent rates across OPOs, independent of population demographic differences.

CONCLUSIONS

OPO is predictive of pediatric deceased organ donor consent independent of demographic differences, with some regions having consistently higher consent rates than others. Sharing best practices for pediatric deceased donor recruitment may be a strategy to increase organ availability in the pediatric population.

Organ Donation Authorization After Brain Death Among Patients Admitted to PICUs in the United States, 2009-2018

OBJECTIVES

To identify trends in and factors associated with pediatric organ donation authorization after brain death.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of data from Virtual Pediatric Systems, LLC (Los Angeles, CA).

SETTING

Data from 123 PICUs reporting to Virtual Pediatric Systems from 2009 to 2018.

PATIENTS

Patients less than 19 years old eligible for organ donation after brain death.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 2,777 eligible patients, 1,935 (70%) were authorized for organ donation; the authorization rate remained unchanged over time (ptrend = 0.22). In a multivariable logistic regression model, hospitalizations lasting greater than 7 days had lower odds of authorization (adjusted odds ratio, 0.5; p < 0.001 vs ≤ 1 d) and White patients had higher odds than other race/ethnicity groups. Authorization was higher for trauma-related encounters (adjusted odds ratio, 1.5; p < 0.001) and when donation was discussed with an organ procurement organization coordinator (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; p < 0.001). Of 123 hospitals, 35 (28%) met or exceeded a 75% organ donation authorization target threshold; these hospitals more often had an organ procurement organization coordinator discussing organ donation (85% vs 72% of encounters; p < 0.001), but no difference was observed by PICU bed size.

CONCLUSIONS

Organ donation authorization after brain death among PICU patients was associated with length of stay, race/ethnicity, and trauma-related encounter, and authorization rates were higher when an organ procurement organization coordinator was involved in the donation discussion. This study identified factors that could inform initiatives to improve the authorization process and increase pediatric organ donation rates.

Lack of knowledge and experience highlights the need for a clear paediatric organ and tissue donation protocol in the Netherlands

Aim

This study explored the attitudes of medical professionals to organ and tissue donation in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the Netherlands. It also examined their compliance with the existing Dutch donation protocol and assessed whether a paediatric donation protocol was needed.

Methods

We invited 966 professionals working in all eight PICUs and the two largest NICUs to complete an online survey from December 2016 until April 2017.

Results

A quarter (25%) took part and they included PICU intensivists, neonatologists, nurses and other health and allied professionals. Most were female and nurses. More than half (54%) of the PICU respondents considered paediatric organ donation to be very important and 53% supported tissue donation. In contrast, only 22% of the NICU respondents believed that both neonatal organ and tissue donation were very important. Familiarity and compliance with the existing national donation protocol were low. PICU nurses had significantly less experience than PICU intensivists and felt less comfortable with the donation process. None of the NICU respondents had prior donation experience.

Conclusion

Paediatric intensive care units and NICU professionals lack specialised knowledge and experience on organ and tissue donation. A comprehensive and clear paediatric donation protocol is clearly needed.

Organ donation from brain-dead pediatric donors in Korea: A 5-year data analysis (2013-2017)

In Korea, 2-4% of brain-dead organ donations are from donors <16 years of age. We aimed to identify the current status of and challenges in pediatric organ donation from brain-dead donors in Korea. We performed a retrospective analysis using data from KONOS between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017. Our research identified 107 pediatric donors aged <16 years, representing 4.4% of all donors in Korea between 2013 and 2017. The consent rate was higher in PDs than in adult donors (47.0% vs 44.9%). The most common cause of brain death in PDs was hypoxia (28.0%), followed by brain tumor and trauma, whereas that in ADs was brain hemorrhage/stroke (42.4%), followed by trauma and hypoxia (P < .001). In both groups, the kidney (PDs vs ADs: 75.7% vs 88.5%), liver (58.9% vs 46.2%), and heart (32.7% vs 29.7%) were the organs most commonly transplanted. However, pancreatic (PDs vs ADs: 30.0% vs 11.7%, P < .001) and small bowel transplantations (4.7% vs 0.2%, P < .001) were more common in PDs, whereas lung (7.5% vs 14.5%, P = .046) and corneal transplantations (14.0% vs 36.2%) were more common in ADs. Only a small proportion of organ donations in Korea are from PDs, but this rate has been maintained. Given the current status of brain-dead pediatric organ donation, a more active approach is required to bring about improvement.

Attitudes and Awareness Towards Organ Donation Among Parents of Pediatric Brain Death Patients in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in Eastern Turkey

Background

The real causes of organ donation refusal decisions of parents after pediatric brain death and the factors that most influence their decisions are not known sufficiently in Turkey. This study aimed to investigate the detailed factors that may be relevant to parents’ refusal, including their education level and knowledge about organ donation.

Material/Methods

Between August 2017 and September 2018, parents who had been asked to allow organ donation from their deceased child were included in this study. An appointment for a home visit for administration of a questionnaire was arranged with the families for the purpose of giving their consent to the study. The questionnaire included items on parents’ demographic data, education level, knowledge about organ donation, and the underlying causes of donation refusal.

Results

The study included 24 parents (12 mothers and 12 fathers) of 13 pediatric patients because the mother of one patient and the father of another died before their child’s brain death. The rate of illiteracy in the parents was 33.3% and only one (4.2%) parent had graduated from university. The rate of knowledge about organ donation was 70.9%, and the most common source of information was television programs (35.9%). All parents remarked on their insufficient information about organ donation. The two most common reasons for organ refusal were unwillingness to allow damage to the child’s internal organ integrity (28.7%) and thinking that their child would feel pain at the time of organ donation (21.2%).

Conclusions

The most important reasons relevant to parents’ organ donation refusal are the parents’ low level of education and insufficient information about brain death and organ donation. The unwillingness to allow impairment of their child’s internal organ integrity and thinking that their child would be in pain at the time of organ donation were the most common reasons.

Parents' experiences of requests for organ and tissue donation: the value of asking

OBJECTIVE

A proportion of children die, making them potentially eligible to be organ/tissue donors. Not all are approached for donation, and experiences of those parents are not well understood. The objective was to investigate to what extent organ and tissue donation (OTD) is discussed as part of end-of-life care and to explore parents' and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences.

DESIGN

A retrospective qualitative study.

SETTING

Multicentre study with participants recruited through two neonatal intensive care units (ICUs), two paediatric ICUs, a cardiac ICU and a children's hospice.

PATIENTS

Bereaved parents, parents of a child with a long-term condition (LTC) and HCPs.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Parents' and HCPs' views and experiences of discussions about OTD.

RESULTS

24 parents of 20 children were interviewed: 21 bereaved parents and 3 parents of a child with a LTC. Seven parents were asked about donation (13 not asked), four agreed and two donated. 41 HCPs were interviewed. Themes: complexity of donation process, OTD as a coping strategy, the importance of asking, difficulty of raising the topic,\ and parents' assumptions about health of organs (when donation is not discussed).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings add new knowledge about parents' assumptions about the value of their child's organs when discussions about OTD are not raised, and that HCPs do not routinely ask, are sometimes hesitant to ask in fear of damaging relationships, and the reality of the complexity of the donation process. Given the current levels of awareness around OTD, the topic should be raised.

Exploring nurses' knowledge, attitudes and feelings towards organ and tissue donation after circulatory death within the paediatric intensive care setting in the United Kingdom: A qualitative content analysis study

OBJECTIVE

This study explored nurses' knowledge, attitudes and feelings towards donation after circulatory death identifying these domains as barriers and facilitators to nurses effectively undertaking their role in the donation after circulatory death donation process.

DESIGN

A single-phase qualitative study design.

SETTING

One paediatric cardiac intensive care unit in a tertiary paediatric hospital in England.

METHODS

Data was collected from eight paediatric cardiac intensive care nurses using semi-structured face to face or telephone interviews facilitated by a clinical vignette. Qualitative content analysis was undertaken adopting both inductive and deductive lenses.

KEY FINDINGS

Three categories were deductively generated within which eleven inductively generated themes were situated. Barriers included: knowledge deficits of both process and resources; assumptions about parental views and reluctance to facilitate sensitive discussions, facilitators included positive attitudes toward donation aligned with a strong professional ethos and family-centred values.

CONCLUSIONS

The paper identifies barriers to the donation after circulatory death process including nurses feeling unprepared for their role, anxiety over family approach and communication methods and support. Highlighted is the need for specific educational interventions, appropriate resources and development of paediatric focussed policy to guide practice. Facilitators to donation include timely, sensitive and appropriate family discussions, trusting nurse-family relationships and improved public awareness.

Pediatric Donor Management Goals in Use by US Organ Procurement Organizations

INTRODUCTION

A recent study of pediatric organ donation after the neurologic determination of death (DNDD) demonstrated an association between the use of donor management goals (DMGs) by organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and organ yield.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pediatric DMGs used by OPOs and any association between specific DMGs and organ yield.

DESIGN

Query of US OPOs who utilized DMGs in the care of pediatric DNDD organ donors from 2010 to 2013.

RESULTS

All 23 OPOs using DMGs for pediatric DNDD organ donors during the study period participated (100%). The OPOs pursued an average 9.6 goals (standard deviation: 3.9; range: 5-22) with 113 unique definitions that targeted 33 aspects of donor hemodynamics, gas exchange/mechanical ventilation, electrolytes/renal function, blood products, thermoregulation, and infection control. The DMGs used by >50% of OPOs included blood pressure, oxygenation (partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO₂), oxygen saturation of hemoglobin by pulse oximetry, or PaO₂/fractional concentration of inspired oxygen [FiO₂] ratio), pH, central venous pressure, serum sodium, urine output, limitations on inotropic support, and serum glucose. There was no significant correlation between the number of DMGs pursued by OPOs and organ yield. There was a difference in the observed/expected organs transplanted in the 0- to 10-year age-group for OPOs that included serum creatinine among their DMGs ( P = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

The pediatric DMGs used by OPOs were generally measurable but diverse in definition and the number of goals pursued. There was no benefit in organ yield from larger DMG bundles. There may be a benefit in organ yield through the use of serum creatinine as a DMG in pediatric donors aged 0 to 10 years.

Transplants for non-lethal conditions: a case against hand transplantation in minors

Human allografts for life-threatening organ failure have been demonstrated to be lifesaving and are now considered to be standard of care for many conditions. Transplantation of non-vital anatomic body parts has also been accomplished. Hand transplantation after limb loss in adults has been shown to offer some promising benefits in both functional and psychological measures in preliminary studies. It has been suggested to expand eligibility criteria to include minors, with one such operation having already been performed. With this in mind, we examine the current state of hand transplantation research in the context of available alternatives. We examine the ethics of carrying out these operations in minors, including under the protections of clinical research. We argue that children should not be considered for this surgery due to the substantial risks of immunosuppressive medication, the likelihood that the graft will need to be replaced during the patient's lifetime and the lack of significant compensatory advantages over modern prosthetics.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Students of the Rzeszow University About the Transplantation of Organs

AIM

One of the conditions for the increasing number of transplants in Poland is the high level of knowledge and the accepting attitude toward organ transplantation in society. The aim of the present study is to get to know the level of knowledge and attitudes of students toward organ transplants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted in June 2017 using a diagnostic survey and estimation method using two research tools: a questionnaire survey and a message test. In the study group there were 164 students of the first (bachelor's) and second-cycle (master's) studies in nursing in the Medical Faculty of the University of Rzeszów.

RESULTS

In the study group, 84.1% of respondents do not have sufficient knowledge about organ transplantation. Sex and religion (P = <.001) differentiates in a statistically significant way the attitude of acceptance of transplantation therapy and attitude toward transplantation in accordance with the religion. Sex (P = .003), place of residence (P = .043), and confession (P = .003) differentiate the willingness of the respondents to be a living donor, but only for those closest to them.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate insufficient knowledge about organ transplantation with a strong acceptance of the transplant therapy method and expressing the will to be a living donor for relatives. In order to promote the idea of organ donation and transplantation therapy, medical personnel as well as the general public should be educated.

Organ and tissue donation in a regional paediatric intensive care unit: evaluation of practice

Approximately 2% of those on the organ transplant list in the UK are children. Early identification of donors and referral to organ donation teams (ODT) has proven to increase both the success rate of gaining consent and the number of organs actually retrieved. To evaluate the practice relating to organ donation for children receiving end-of-life care on a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) measured against the National Guidelines. All children 0-18 who received their end-of-life care and died on the PICU. A retrospective cohort study of organ donation patterns including referral, approach, consent and donation. This involved a review of case notes on PICU between the years 2009 and 2014. One hundred five deaths were identified and 100 notes were examined and data analysed to ascertain if religion, age and length of stay on PICU impacted on practice. Eighty-six children met the early identification criteria for potential donors, 40 (46.5%) children were referred to the ODT and 33 (38.3%) families were approached regarding donation. Twenty-one (24.4%) families consented to donation. Seventeen donations took place with a total of 41 sets of organs/tissues retrieved. Despite the majority of children meeting early identification for potential donors, many were not being referred.

CONCLUSIONS

All children on end-of-life care should be referred for potential organ donation. Organ donation needs to be seen as a priority for hospitals as a part of routine end-of-life care to help increase referral rates and give families the opportunity to donate. Many paediatric deaths are not referred for consideration of organ donation, despite guidelines stating that this process should be standard of care. Further optimization of referral rates may aid in increasing the number of organs available for donation. What is Known: • Shortage of organs continues to be a national problem. • NICE guidelines state that all patients who are on end-of-life care should have the option of organ donation explored. • Required referral both increases the number of donors and organs donated. What is New: • The process of identifying and referring children for paediatric organ donation. • Identifies that children are still not being referred for organ donation. • Organ donation is still not a priority for hospitals.

Literature overview highlights lack of paediatric donation protocols but identifies common themes that could guide their development

AIM

Paediatric donation is a unique and extremely sensitive process that requires specific knowledge and competencies. Most countries use protocols for organ and tissue donation to ensure optimal care for the donor and family, but these mainly focus on adults. However, the donation process for children differs from adults in many ways. An overview of the literature was performed to identify protocols for the paediatric population.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Internet were searched up to March 2016 for papers or other sources in English related to specific organ and tissue donation protocols for children and neonates. This comprised title, abstract and then full-text screening of relevant data.

RESULTS

We included 12 papers and two electronic sources that were mainly from North America and Europe. Most discussed donations after cardiac death. The recurring themes included identifying potential donors, approaching parents, palliative care and collaboration with organ procurement organisations. Most papers called for paediatric donation policies to be standardised.

CONCLUSION

Scientific publications in English on paediatric donation protocols are very scarce. No comprehensive paediatric donation protocol was found. We identified several recurring themes in the literature that could be used to develop such protocols.

Qualitative Research Process Applied to Organ Donation

The family interview for organ donation continues to be one of the main concerns of transplant coordinators. We approach the family because we need to know the opinion of the person who has just died about the donation of his or her organs. The objective of this article is to describe how the application of the qualitative methodology has been followed to perceive what the relatives live in the moment in which they are informed of the death of their relative and they are offered the option of organ donation. Phenomenology is a philosophy that deals with the granting of meanings. It can simply describe or try to interpret them. Our informants were selected from among donor families until the 11 families were obtained. We use the Giorgi method because it allows us to identify the essence of a phenomenon and transform the lived experience into a textual expression of its essence. The unit of analysis was, each of the statements of the discourse that describes and interprets a reality, what we call "essence" or "meaning units." It must be the minimum expression of an episode and the experience in relation to it. We have detected 24 themes of the meaning units are most important for families in our area. Families agree on talking about donation, mourning, death, consolation from the donation, and the importance of the support received. Phenomenology is adequate to deepen into the feelings and interests of families in the process of donation.

Increasing organ donation rates by revealing recipient details to families of potential donors

Many families refuse to consent to donation from their deceased relatives or over-rule the consent given before death by the patient, but giving families more information about the potential recipients of organs could reduce refusal rates. In this paper, we analyse arguments for and against doing so, and conclude that this strategy should be attempted. While it would be impractical and possibly unethical to give details of actual potential recipients, generic, realistic information about the people who could benefit from organs should be provided to families before they make a decision about donation or attempt to over-rule it.

Education on organ donation and transplantation in primary school; teachers' support and the first results of a teaching module

Organ and tissue donation can also involve children. Because of its sensitivity, this topic requires careful decision making. Children have the ability to carefully reflect on this subject and enjoy participating in family discussions about it. Therefore, what children need is proper information. When schools are used to educate children about this subject, information about teacher support for this type of lesson along with its effects on the depth of family discussions is important. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all 7,542 primary schools in the Netherlands. The goal was to gather information on teachers’ perspectives about a neutral lesson devoted to organ and tissue donation, and also on the best age to start giving such a lesson. The second part of our study examined the effects of a newly developed lesson among 269 primary school pupils. The school response was 23%. Of these, 70% were positive towards a lesson; best age to start was 10–11 years. Pupils reported 20% more family discussions after school education and enjoyed learning more about this topic. There is significant support in primary schools for a school lesson on organ and tissue donation. Educational programs in schools support family discussions.

"Effective" Requesting: A Scoping Review of the Literature on Asking Families to Consent to Organ and Tissue Donation

BACKGROUND

Families are often asked to consent to the donation of their deceased relative's organs or tissues. These end-of-life conversations are important because they affect consent rates as well as the psychological impact of the decision for families. This scoping review of the literature on requesting family consent was prepared to support of the development of leading practice recommendations for end-of-life conversations with families of potential donors. A scoping review maps research activity in a field across a range of commentary and empirical study designs but does not attempt meta-synthesis of empirical data or quality assessment.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to February 2015 on the questions of what constitutes an "effective" request and the factors that affect consent rates and family satisfaction with their decision and the process. This review includes a final set of 168 articles addressing (a) whether, when, and how to ask families for consent to donation or (b) characteristics of families or decedents that affect families' decisions or family satisfaction with their decisions.

RESULTS

Six main themes were identified: (1) the objectives of requesting and encouraging family consent to donation, (2) the effect of the donation decision on family well-being, (3) the process of requesting family consent, (4) the impact of the quality of the care for the deceased and for the family, (5) the content and manner of the request for family consent, and (6) the characteristics of the family and deceased that affect the request for family consent.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review found that there is a large literature on how to modify the process and manner of the request to increase family consent rates. Another important line of inquiry focuses on the psychological impact of the decision on the family. Although a scoping review does not attempt to synthesize results or draw evidence-based conclusions, the literature generally supports the intuitive expectations that compassionate and respectful care for the deceased and family, listening for and addressing family concerns, and an attitude to donation that is positive (but not solely procurement-focused) and is best for both consent rates and family well-being. Although the presumption is often that the primary objective of asking for family consent is to secure consent and donation, some ethical commentary on requesting consent emphasizes that this objective must be balanced with the parallel obligation to protect the psychological well-being of families. This places some constraints on the approaches used in family consent discussions.

Death by neurologic criteria in a neonate: Implications for organ donation

We illustrate a unique case of neonatal organ donation in a full-term newborn with severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and multi-organ dysfunction that underwent therapeutic hypothermia. Prolonged hypothermia permitted adequate time for recovery of certain end-organs before such time that death by neurologic criteria was declared. Parental values aligned with the opportunity for organ donation.

A Comparison of the Request Process and Outcomes in Adult and Pediatric Organ Donation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although existing studies suggest that factors affecting families' decisions regarding pediatric organ donation mirror those for adult patients, health professionals working in this area maintain that pediatric and adult decision-makers differ in significant ways. This study compared the request process, experiences, and authorization decisions between family decision-makers (FDMs) of adult and pediatric donors and nondonors.

METHODS

Perceptions of the donation request were collected via telephone interviews with 1601 FDMs approached by staff from 9 US organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Authorization regarding donation (ie, authorized/refused) was obtained from FDM reports and verified by using OPO records. Tests of association were used to estimate differences between FDMs of adult and pediatric patients. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify variables predicting FDM authorization.

RESULTS

FDMs of children were significantly more likely to authorize donation than were FDMs of adults (89.7% vs 83.2%; χ(2) = 6.2, P = .01). Differences were found between pediatric and adult families' initial feelings toward donation, donation-related topics discussed, communication behaviors and techniques used, perceptions of the request, and receipt and preference of grief information. The likelihood of FDM authorization increased with the number of topics discussed and communication skills employed during requests. Authorization was not predicted by patient age (ie, adult versus pediatric).

CONCLUSIONS

FDMs of children are willing to donate and experience no more psychological distress from the request for donation than do FDMs of adults. Communication emerged as a critical factor of family authorization, reinforcing its importance in requests for donation.

Organ donation in Switzerland--an analysis of factors associated with consent rate

Background and Aim

Switzerland has a low post mortem organ donation rate. Here we examine variables that are associated with the consent of the deceased’s next of kin (NOK) for organ donation, which is a prerequisite for donation in Switzerland.

Methods and Analysis

During one year, we registered information from NOK of all deceased patients in Swiss intensive care units, who were approached for consent to organ donation. We collected data on patient demographics, characteristics of NOK, factors related to the request process and to the clinical setting. We analyzed the association of collected predictors with consent rate using univariable logistic regression models; predictors with p-values <0.2 were selected for a multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Of 266 NOK approached for consent, consent was given in 137 (51.5%) cases. In multivariable analysis, we found associations of consent rates with Swiss nationality (OR 3.09, 95% CI: 1.46–6.54) and German language area (OR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14–0.73). Consent rates tended to be higher if a parent was present during the request (OR 1.76, 95% CI: 0.93–3.33) and if the request was done before brain death was formally declared (OR 1.87, 95% CI: 0.90–3.87).

Conclusion

Establishing an atmosphere of trust between the medical staff putting forward a request and the NOK, allowing sufficient time for the NOK to consider donation, and respecting personal values and cultural differences, could be of importance for increasing donation rates. Additional measures are needed to address the pronounced differences in consent rates between language regions.

Contact between deceased donors' families and organ recipients

The benefits and disadvantages of posttransplant contact between a donor family and the organ recipient are disputed. In this study far more contacters reported benefits rather than disadvantages and noncontacters reported the opposite. The dissatisfaction of noncontacters with no contact was high: no less than 60% wanted some form of contact in the future. The authors conclude that contact has more benefits for the donor family than disadvantages, evidenced by families' desire to maintain contact with the organ recipient. Both donor families and organ recipients need the transplant coordinator's initiative and guidance on this issue.

An official American Thoracic Society/International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation/Society of Critical Care Medicine/Association of Organ and Procurement Organizations/United Network of Organ Sharing Statement: ethical and policy considerations in organ donation after circulatory determination of death

RATIONALE

Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) has the potential to increase the number of organs available for transplantation. Because consent and management of potential donors must occur before death, DCDD raises unique ethical and policy issues.

OBJECTIVES

To develop an ethics and health policy statement on adult and pediatric DCDD relevant to critical care and transplantation stakeholders.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of stakeholders was convened to develop an ethics and health policy statement. The panel consisted of representatives from the American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, and the United Network of Organ Sharing. The panel reviewed the literature, discussed important ethics and health policy considerations, and developed a guiding framework for decision making by stakeholders.

RESULTS

A framework to guide ethics and health policy statement was established, which addressed the consent process, pre- and post mortem interventions, the determination of death, provisions of end-of-life care, and pediatric DCDD.

CONCLUSIONS

The information presented in this Statement is based on the current evidence, experience, and clinical rationale. New clinical research and the development and dissemination of new technologies will eventually necessitate an update of this Statement.

Making Meaning in the Legacy of Tissue Donation for Donor Families

Context

Individuals needing lifesaving (heart valves, skin grafts for repair of critical burn injuries) and life-enhancing (corneas, bone and tendon grafts, skin, and veins) tissue donations outnumber the tissues available for transplant.

Objective

To describe the grief family members experienced 6 months after donation and to learn how family decision makers gained meaning from the decision to donate a loved one's tissues. This is phase 1 of a longitudinal study in which family decision makers will be surveyed again at 13 and 25 months after donation.

Design

Qualitative descriptive.

Participants

One hundred seven family decision makers whose family member died a traumatic sudden death and who authorized donating tissues for transplant.

Data Collection and Analysis

Data were written responses to the questions, “If you could ask or tell your dead family member something, what would it be” and “What meaning does donating tissue to others have for you” Data were analyzed by using content analysis procedures.

Results

Concepts derived from the first question represent the context of family members grieving the sudden death of a loved one. Concepts were (1) feeling empty, (2) missing and loving, (3) being grateful, and (4) having regrets. The concepts derived from the second question were (1) fulfilling their family member's wish, (2) doing the right thing, (3) believing something good came from the death, (4) helping others, and (5) living on. Reasons for donating were based, in part, on honoring the legacy of their loved ones who had given of themselves to others in life and now continued to give to others after death.

Conclusion

The results of this study provide a basis for health professionals and donation staffs to better understand the context within which families grieve and give meaning to tissue donation.

Factors Influencing Bereaved Families’ Decisions About Organ Donation

This article reports on the process and outcomes of a systematic integrative literature review, designed to enhance understanding of the factors influencing bereaved families’ decisions to agree or decline the donation of their deceased relative’s organs for transplantation. Research originating from eight Western countries ( N = 20 studies) provided an international perspective to the review. Thematic analysis and synthesis of textual data culminated in the development of three global themes (past, present, and future) that captured the temporal dimensions of family decision making. The review findings provide valuable insight into ways of increasing the rate of consent to organ donation through the development family-centered care interventions that reflect the needs of the bereaved. Further research to explore the pathway of donation after circulatory death and the experiences of bereaved families who decline organ donation is essential to providing a more complete understanding of the factors affecting donation decisions.

Approaching families for organ donation-intensivists' perspectives

In Australia the initial approach to families for organ donation is almost always undertaken by intensivists. There is, however, a paucity of literature on intensivists' views on this approach and how their approach compares with recommendations in published literature on this subject. This study consisted of a survey of the views of intensive care consultants and senior intensive care registrars in the four major teaching hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, on how they approached families for organ donation. The study also includes a review of recently published literature on approaching families for organ donation. The survey results indicate that most intensive care consultants felt adequately trained to approach families for organ donation, but almost half of the group surveyed would prefer a collaborative approach with either a donor co-ordinator or a colleague with additional training on this subject. Despite recommendations in the literature and from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society to determine the registration status of potential donors on the Australian Organ Donation Registry prior to discussions with families, this was not always undertaken. In addition, the benefits of organ donation were not always discussed with families, nor were the reasons for refusal of consent sensitively explored.

Interim results of a national test of the rapid assessment of hospital procurement barriers in donation (RAPiD)

Organ donation remains a major public health challenge with over 114 000 people on the waitlist in the United States. Among other factors, extant research highlights the need to improve the identification and timely referral of potential donors by hospital healthcare providers (HCPs) to organ procurement organizations (OPOs). We implemented a national test of the Rapid Assessment of hospital Procurement barriers in Donation (RAPiD) to identify assets and barriers to the organ donation and patient referral processes; assess hospital-OPO relationships and offer tailored recommendations for improving these processes. Having partnered with seven OPOs, data were collected at 70 hospitals with high donor potential in the form of direct observations and interviews with 2358 HCPs. We found that donation attitudes and knowledge among HCPs were high, but use of standard referral criteria was lacking. Significant differences were found in the donation-related attitudes, knowledge and behaviors of physicians and emergency department staff as compared to other staff in intensive care units with high organ donor potential. Also, while OPO staff were generally viewed positively, they were often perceived as outsiders rather than members of healthcare teams. Recommendations for improving the referral and donation processes are discussed.

Children as donors: a national study to assess procurement of organs and tissues in pediatric intensive care units

A shortage of size-matched organs and tissues is the key factor limiting transplantation in children. Empirical data on procurement from pediatric donors is sparse. This study investigated donor identification, parental consent, and effectuation rates, as well as adherence to the national protocol. A national retrospective cohort study was conducted in all eight Dutch pediatric intensive care units. Records of deceased children were analyzed by an independent donation officer. Seventy-four (11%) of 683 deceased children were found to be suitable for organ donation and 132 (19%) for tissue donation. Sixty-two (84%) potential organ donors had been correctly identified; the parental consent and effectuation rate was 42%. Sixty-three (48%) potential tissue donors had been correctly identified; the parental consent and effectuation rate was 27%. Correct identification increased with age (logistic regression, organs: P = .024; tissues: P = .011). Although an overall identification rate of 84% of potential organ donors may seem acceptable, the variation observed suggests room for improvement, as does the overall low rate of identification of pediatric tissue donors. Efforts to address the shortage of organs and tissues for transplantation in children should focus on identifying potential donors and on the reasons why parents do not consent.

Mass media campaigns and organ donation: managing conflicting messages and interests

Mass media campaigns are widely and successfully used to change health decisions and behaviors for better or for worse in society. In the United States, media campaigns have been launched at local offices of the states' department of motor vehicles to promote citizens' willingness to organ donation and donor registration. We analyze interventional studies of multimedia communication campaigns to encourage organ-donor registration at local offices of states' department of motor vehicles. The media campaigns include the use of multifaceted communication tools and provide training to desk clerks in the use of scripted messages for the purpose of optimizing enrollment in organ-donor registries. Scripted messages are communicated to customers through mass audiovisual entertainment media, print materials and interpersonal interaction at the offices of departments of motor vehicles. These campaigns give rise to three serious concerns: (1) bias in communicating information with scripted messages without verification of the scientific accuracy of information, (2) the provision of misinformation to future donors that may result in them suffering unintended consequences from consenting to medical procedures before death (e.g, organ preservation and suitability for transplantation), and (3) the unmanaged conflict of interests for organizations charged with implementing these campaigns, (i.e, dual advocacy for transplant recipients and donors). We conclude the following: (1) media campaigns about healthcare should communicate accurate information to the general public and disclose factual materials with the least amount of bias; (2) conflicting interests in media campaigns should be managed with full public transparency; (3) media campaigns should disclose the practical implications of procurement as well as acknowledge the medical, legal, and religious controversies of determining death in organ donation; (4) organ-donor registration must satisfy the criteria of informed consent; (5) media campaigns should serve as a means of public education about organ donation and should not be a form of propaganda.

Organ donation in Australia

Organ donation in Australia has undergone a series of important changes in the past 3 years. An ethically complex and emotionally profound subject, important questions are being raised about the approach to organ donation by the government, by health-care professionals and also by the public. This paper highlights some of the changes within the Australian organ donation community and explores several controversies that accompany the widespread implementation of measures aimed at significantly improving organ donation throughout the country.

Family initiated discussions about organ donation at the time of death

Some family members initiate organ donation discussions before being approached by donor coordinators or healthcare providers. We examined differences between families that did vs. did not initiate organ donation discussions and factors predicting donation consent among those families that self-initiated the discussion. Next-of-kin of donor-eligible individuals (147 donors, 138 non-donors) from one organ procurement organization completed a telephone interview. Seventy-three families (25.6%) first mentioned organ donation, and 54 (74%) of them consented to donation. Several characteristics of the deceased and next-of-kin were associated with whether family members initiated the donation discussion with donation coordinators or healthcare providers. Moreover, family mention of donation was more likely to yield consent when the deceased was younger (OR=0.95, CI=0.92-0.99), next-of-kin was a registered donor (OR=3.86, CI=2.84-6.76), and when family was more satisfied with the healthcare team (OR=1.20, CI=1.04-1.39). Knowing the deceased's donation intentions and being exposed to positive organ donation messages are more likely to trigger families to raise donation with providers. Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) and healthcare providers should work collaboratively to develop strategies for how best to respond to families who initiate this conversation.

Perceived support among families deciding about organ donation for their loved ones: donor vs nondonor next of kin

BACKGROUND

Families' experiences in the hospital influence their decisions about donating organs of brain-dead relatives. Meeting families' support needs during this traumatic time is an obligation and a challenge for critical care staff.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To elicit family members' accounts of various types of support received and perceived quality of care for themselves and their loved ones when they made the donation decision, and (2) to examine the relationship between these factors and the families' donation decision.

METHODS

Retrospective telephone interviews of 199 families from different regions of the country were completed. Aside from demographic data, the survey addressed perceptions of informational, emotional, and instrumental support and quality of care.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four study participants consented to donation; 45 declined. White next of kin were significantly more likely than African Americans to consent. Specific elements of reported support were significantly associated with consent to donate. Donor and nondonor families had differing perceptions of quality care for themselves and their loved ones. Receiving understandable information about organ donation was the strongest predictor of consent.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific supportive behaviors by staff as recounted by family members of potential donors were significantly associated with consent to donation. These behaviors lend themselves to creative training and educational programs for staff. Such interventions are essential not only for next of kin of brain-dead patients, but also for staff and ultimately for the public as a whole.

Scientific, legal, and ethical challenges of end-of-life organ procurement in emergency medicine

AIM

We review (1) scientific evidence questioning the validity of declaring death and procuring organs in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard of death) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard of death) donation; (2) consequences of collaborative programs realigning hospital policies to maximize access of procurement coordinators to critically and terminally ill patients as potential donors on arrival in emergency departments; and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of current practices of organ procurement on patients and their families.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant publications in peer-reviewed journals and government websites.

RESULTS

Scientific evidence undermines the biological criteria of death that underpin the definition of death in heart-beating (i.e., neurological standard) and non-heart-beating (i.e., circulatory-respiratory standard) donation. Philosophical reinterpretation of the neurological and circulatory-respiratory standards in the death statute, to avoid the appearance of organ procurement as an active life-ending intervention, lacks public and medical consensus. Collaborative programs bundle procurement coordinators together with hospital staff for a team-huddle and implement a quality improvement tool for a Rapid Assessment of Hospital Procurement Barriers in Donation. Procurement coordinators have access to critically ill patients during the course of medical treatment with no donation consent and with family or surrogates unaware of their roles. How these programs affect the medical care of these patients has not been studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Policies enforcing end-of-life organ procurement can have unintended consequences: (1) erosion of care in the patient's best interests, (2) lack of transparency, and (3) ethical and legal ramifications of flawed standards of declaring death.