Kilohertz and Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation With the Same Pulse Duration Have Similar Efficiency for Inducing Isometric Knee Extension Torque and Discomfort

Comparing Nerve Versus Muscle Wide-Pulse High-Frequency Electrical Stimulation for Maximal and Submaximal Efforts

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation hinges on the evoked torque level, which can be attained through either conventional (CONV) or wide-pulse high frequency (WPHF). However, the best electrode placement is still unclear. This study adopted a crossover design to compare the effects of WPHF applied to the tibial nerve trunk (N-WPHF) or muscle (M-WPHF) with CONV in healthy participants.

METHODS

A total of 30 participants (age: 22.4 [4.5]) were involved in 4 sessions. During each session, participants performed: 2 maximal voluntary contractions, 2 contractions at maximal evoked torque, and 2 contractions at submaximal evoked torque at 20% maximal voluntary contraction. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity-evoked torque, efficiency, and discomfort were measured in maximal and submaximal conditions. Statistical analyses were conducted using a 1-way mixed-model analysis of variance with repeated measures.

RESULTS

N-WPHF and M-WPHF showed higher evoked torque than CONV (P = .002 and P = .036) and greater efficiency than CONV for maximal evoked torque (P = .006 and P = .002). N-WPHF induced higher efficiency than M-WPHF and CONV for submaximal evoked torque (P = .004). Higher discomfort was observed for both N-WPHF and M-WPHF for submaximal evoked torque compared with CONV (P = .003 and P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that WPHF applied at either the nerve or muscle could be the best choice for the maximal condition, whereas nerve application is preferred for the submaximal condition.

Influence of kilohertz frequency, burst duty cycle and burst duration on evoked torque, discomfort and muscle efficiency: A randomized crossover trial

Kilohertz-frequency alternating currents (KFACs) have been indicated to minimize muscle atrophy and weakness. However, the optimal stimulation parameters still need to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different KFACs on evoked torque, current efficiency, and perceived discomfort.

DESIGN

KFACs with frequencies of 1 kHz (Aussie current) and 2.5 kHz (Russian current), along with two duty cycles (10% and 20%), were randomly applied to the triceps surae muscle of healthy participants using a crossover design. The NMES intensity, NMES-evoked torque, NMES efficiency, and NMES discomfort were measured in maximal and submaximal conditions. Statistical analyses were conducted using a two-way mixed-model ANOVA with repeated measures. Forty-four participants were included.

RESULTS

Aussie currents produced higher evoked torque and efficiency in maximal and submaximal efforts, with higher perceived discomfort in maximal effort. Although the Australian current may cause greater discomfort at maximal efforts, it matches the Russian current in perceived discomfort at submaximal levels. The 20% duty cycle produced the highest efficiency in submaximal efforts.

CONCLUSION

In both maximal and submaximal efforts, the Aussie current demonstrated superior NMES efficiency, yielding higher torque with lower amplitude than the Russian current. Clinicians should take these findings into consideration when prescribing KFACs to optimize clinical outcomes.

The effects of the Aussie current on pain, torque and muscle strength: Systematic review

BACKGROUND

The Aussie Current (AC) is a medium frequency electrical current of 1 and 4 kHz modulated in bursts used to reduce pain, increase muscle strength and produce torque in adults. However, there is still no consensus on these effects.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review available evidence on the effects of AC on pain, muscle strength, torque, comfort and functionality in adults.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. A search was carried out in the Lilacs, Scielo, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and PEDro databases, from 10/2021 to 02/2022. Randomized or non-randomized clinical trials that investigated the effects of the application of AC were selected. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias in the studies using the JADAD scale. The quality of the evidence of some outcomes was assessed using the GRADE system of rating The selected studies used AC as intervention and presented pain, muscle strength, torque, comfort and/or functionality as outcomes.

RESULTS

21 studies (590 participants) were included. 14 articles were classified as low quality and 7 as high quality. The quality of the evidence was moderate. The effects of AC on the studied outcomes are still controversial. As for the consensus regarding the chosen frequency, 80,9% (n = 17) of the studies used the frequency of 1 kHz.

CONCLUSION

Although it was verified that the frequency of 1 kHz is the most used, the studies that address AC are scarce and with methodological diversity, which makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of this current. Thus, we suggest that further studies should be carried out to elucidate the effects of AC on pain, muscle strength and torque production.

Effect of muscle length on maximum evoked torque, discomfort, contraction fatigue, and strength adaptations during electrical stimulation in adult populations: A systematic review

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can improve physical function in different populations. NMES-related outcomes may be influenced by muscle length (i.e., joint angle), a modulator of the force generation capacity of muscle fibers. Nevertheless, to date, there is no comprehensive synthesis of the available scientific evidence regarding the optimal joint angle for maximizing the effectiveness of NMES. We performed a systematic review to investigate the effect of muscle length on NMES-induced torque, discomfort, contraction fatigue, and strength training adaptations in healthy and clinical adult populations (PROSPERO: CRD42022332965). We conducted searches across seven electronic databases: PUBMED, Web of Science, EMBASE, PEDro, BIREME, SCIELO, and Cochrane, over the period from June 2022 to October 2023, without restricting the publication year. We included cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that used NMES as an intervention or assessment tool for comparing muscle lengths in adult populations. We excluded studies on vocalization, respiratory, or pelvic floor muscles. Data extraction was performed via a standardized form to gather information on participants, interventions, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for cross-over trials and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Out of the 1185 articles retrieved through our search strategy, we included 36 studies in our analysis, that included 448 healthy young participants (age: 19-40 years) in order to investigate maximum evoked torque (n = 268), contraction fatigability (n = 87), discomfort (n = 82), and muscle strengthening (n = 22), as well as six participants with spinal cord injuries, and 15 healthy older participants. Meta-analyses were possible for comparing maximal evoked torque according to quadriceps muscle length through knee joint angle. At optimal muscle length 50° - 70° of knee flexion, where 0° is full extension), there was greater evoked torque during nerve stimulation compared to very short (0 - 30°) (p<0.001, CI 95%: -2.03, -1.15 for muscle belly stimulation, and -3.54, -1.16 for femoral nerve stimulation), short (31° - 49°) (p = 0.007, CI 95%: -1.58, -0.25), and long (71° - 90°) (p<0.001, CI 95%: 0.29, 1.02) muscle lengths. At long muscle lengths, NMES evoked greater torque than very short (p<0.001, CI 95%: -2.50, -0.67) and short (p = 0.04, CI 95%: -2.22, -0.06) lengths. The shortest quadriceps length generated the highest perceived discomfort for a given current amplitude. The amount of contraction fatigability was greater when muscle length allowed greater torque generation in the pre-fatigue condition. Strength gains were greater for a protocol at the optimal muscle length than for short muscle length. The quality of evidence was very high for most comparisons for evoked torque. However, further studies are necessary to achieve certainty for the other outcomes. Optimal muscle length should be considered the primary choice during NMES interventions, as it promotes higher levels of force production and may facilitate the preservation/gain in muscle force and mass, with reduced discomfort. However, a longer than optimal muscle length may also be used, due to possible muscle lengthening at high evoked tension. Thorough understanding of these physiological principles is imperative for the appropriate prescription of NMES for healthy and clinical populations.

Effects of Kilohertz Frequency, Burst Duty Cycle, and Burst Duration on Evoked Torque, Perceived Discomfort and Muscle Fatigue: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Kilohertz-frequency alternating current is used to minimize muscle atrophy and muscle weakness and improve muscle performance. However, no systematic reviews have evaluated the best Kilohertz-frequency alternating current parameters for this purpose. We investigated the effects of the carrier frequency, burst duty cycles, and burst durations on evoked torque, perceived discomfort, and muscle fatigue. A search of eight data sources by two independent reviewers resulted in 13 peer-reviewed studies being selected, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and rated using the PEDro scale to evaluate the methodological quality of the studies. Most studies showed that carrier frequencies up to 1 kHz evoked higher torque, while carrier frequencies between 2.5 and 5 kHz resulted in lower perceived discomfort. In addition, most studies showed that shorter burst duty cycles (10%-50%) induced higher evoked torque and lower perceived discomfort. Methodological quality scores ranged from 5 to 8 on the PEDro scale. We conclude that Kilohertz-frequency alternating current develops greater evoked torque for carrier frequencies between 1 and 2.5 kHz and burst duty cycles less than 50%. Lower perceived discomfort was generated using Kilohertz-frequency alternating currents between 2.5 and 5 kHz and burst duty cycles less than 50%.

Kilohertz Frequency Alternating Current Induces Less Evoked Torque and Less Neuromuscular Efficiency Than Pulsed Current in Healthy People: A Randomized Crossover Trial

CONTEXT

Pulsed current and kilohertz frequency alternating current are 2 types of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) currents often used by clinicians during rehabilitation. However, the low methodological quality and the different NMES parameters and protocols used in several studies might explain their inconclusive results in terms of their effects in the evoked torque and the discomfort level. In addition, the neuromuscular efficiency (ie, the NMES current type that evokes the highest torque with the lowest current intensity) has not been established yet. Therefore, our objective was to compare the evoked torque, current intensity, neuromuscular efficiency (evoked torque/current intensity ratio), and discomfort between pulsed current and kilohertz frequency alternating current in healthy people.

DESIGN

A double-blind, randomized crossover trial.

METHODS

Thirty healthy men (23.2 [4.5] y) participated in the study. Each participant was randomized to 4 current settings: 2 kilohertz frequency alternating currents with 2.5 kHz of carrier frequency and similar pulse duration (0.4 ms) and burst frequency (100 Hz) but with different burst duty cycles (20% and 50%) and burst durations (2 and 5 ms); and 2 pulsed currents with similar pulse frequency (100 Hz) and different pulse duration (2 and 0.4 ms). The evoked torque, current intensity at the maximal tolerated intensity, neuromuscular efficiency, and discomfort level were evaluated.

RESULTS

Both pulsed currents generated higher evoked torque than the kilohertz frequency alternating currents, despite the similar between-currents discomfort levels. The 2 ms pulsed current showed lower current intensity and higher neuromuscular efficiency compared with both alternated currents and with the 0.4 ms pulsed current.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher evoked torque, higher neuromuscular efficiency, and similar discomfort of the 2 ms pulsed current compared with 2.5-kHz frequency alternating current suggests this current as the best choice for clinicians to use in NMES-based protocols.

KiloHertz currents on aspects of muscle function: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with kiloHertz currents (kHz) is a resource used in rehabilitation for producing muscle contractions with functional objectives, resulting from the optimization of the performance of aspects of muscle function (AOMF). However, parameters such as inadequate frequency, phase duration, amplitude, and therapy time may limit the effectiveness of NMES by the absence of adequate stimuli to generate positive adaptations in the AOMF. This study aimed to present an overview of the effectiveness and dosimetry of NMES by kHz on AOMF, such as torque and hypertrophy, in healthy people.

METHODS

The study was outlined as a scoping review. From the search, 3892 studies were found of which were incorporated into Rayyan software for exclusion of duplicates and further selection by titles and abstracts, which resulted in 33 articles for this review.

RESULTS

According to the included studies, kHz can increase torque and generate hypertrophy. Only the studies with Russian current showed hypertrophy gains. Dosimetry was not always detailed in the studies, which hinders stipulating optimal parameters for kHz.

CONCLUSION

From this review, it is concluded that NMSC by kHz is a valid resource to optimize AOMF, although the dosimetric parameters are still inconsistent.

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on torque and performance in recreational distance runners: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is used by athletes to improve muscle performance. However, evidence on the use of NMES in long distance runners is scarce. As such, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of NMES on the muscle torque and sports performance of long-distance recreational runners.

METHODS

This was a blinded randomized controlled trial. Data from 30 volunteers were analyzed. Participants were randomly allocated to an experimental (n = 15) or control group (n = 15). The experimental group was submitted to running training (RT) and a strengthening protocol with NMES (1 kHz, modulated in 2 ms bursts, 50 Hz modulated burst frequency and 10% duty cycle, 15 min totaling 18 contractions per sessions) for 6 weeks, with 3 sessions per week, while controls were submitted to RT alone. The following variables were analyzed: peak isometric (ISO), concentric (CON), and eccentric (ECC) torque of the quadriceps muscle in voluntary contractions, ventilatory anaerobic thresholds (VATs), maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), and oxygen cost of transport (OCT).

RESULTS

The NMES group obtained higher values of ISO, 21.04% (p = 0.001), CON, 21.97% (p = 0.001) and ECC, 18.74% (p = 0.001) peak torque and VAT1, 9.56% (p = 0.001), as well as a statistically significant improvement in oxygen cost of transport at VAT1 when compared to controls (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

NMES was effective in improving peak isometric, concentric and eccentric quadriceps muscle torque, in addition to being an interesting resource for enhancing sports performance in long-distance recreational runners and future clinical trials should be performed to compare the use of NMES to different forms of training over longer training periods.

Effects of combined treatment with blood flow restriction and low-current electrical stimulation on capillary regression in the soleus muscle of diabetic rats

To clarify the preventive effects of low-current electrical stimulation (ES) under blood flow restriction (Bfr) on diabetes-associated capillary regression in skeletal muscles, we assessed the changes in three-dimensional capillary architecture and angiogenic factors. Twenty-four Goto-Kakizaki rats were randomly divided into four groups: the sedentary diabetes mellitus (DM), Bfr (DM + Bfr), electrical stimulation (DM + ES), and Bfr plus ES (DM + Bfr + ES) groups. Six healthy Wistar rats were used as age-matched controls. Bfr was performed using pressure cuffs (80 mmHg) around the thighs of the rats, and low-current ES was applied to the calf muscles of the rats. The current intensity was set at 30% of the maximal isometric contraction (24-30 mA). The treatments were delivered three times a week for 8 wk. In the DM group, the capillary diameter and volume of the soleus muscle decreased, and, the antiangiogenic factor level increased. Furthermore, DM caused an increase in the hypoxia-inducible factor. Individually, Bfr or ES treatments failed to inhibit the DM-associated capillary regression and increase in antiangiogenic factor. However, combined treatment with Bfr and ES prevented DM-associated capillary regression via inhibition of the increased antiangiogenic factor and enhancement of interleukin-15 expression, mitochondrial biogenesis factors, and a proangiogenic factor. Therefore, DM-associated capillary regression inhibited by the combined treatment may prevent the effects of the increased antiangiogenic factor and enhance the proangiogenic factor.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The combined treatment of blood flow restriction and low intensity electrical stimulation attenuated type 2 diabetes (T2D)-associated capillary regression in the skeletal muscles. The treatment inhibits the T2D-associated increase in antiangiogenic factors via inhibition of intramuscular chronic hypoxia; it can inhibit intramuscular chronic hypoxia by enhancing proangiogenic factors. These results suggest that the combined treatment may be an effective therapeutic intervention for the prevention of T2D-associated capillary regression in the skeletal muscles.

Effects of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on submaximal and maximum torque, efficiency, and discomfort: a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an important therapeutic tool for rehabilitation. However, best stimulation parameters remain to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of different electrical stimulation currents and phase durations on torque, efficiency, and discomfort.

METHODS

Using a cross-over design, kHz frequency alternating currents (KFAC) and pulsed currents (PC) with narrow (200 µs) or wide (500 µs) phase durations were randomly applied on knee extensor muscles of healthy participants with a minimum of seven days between sessions. The NMES-evoked torque, NMES-efficiency, and discomfort (visual 0-10 cm analogue scale) were measured for each stimulation intensity increments (10 mA). Statistics were conducted using a three-way analysis of variances (phase duration x current x intensity), followed by Tukey post-hoc.

RESULTS

Twenty-four males (age 22.3 ± 3.5years) were included. No effect of NMES current was observed for torque, efficiency, and discomfort. For wide phase durations (500 µs), torque significantly increased for all stimulation intensities. For narrow phase durations (200 µs) evoked torque significantly increased only after 40% of maximal stimulation intensity. Phase durations of 500 µs produced greater torque than 200 µs. Discomfort was greater with 500 µs when compared to 200 µs. Submaximal relative torque, for example 40% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), was obtained with ∼ 60% and ∼ 80% of the maximal current intensity for 500 µs and 200 µs, respectively.

CONCLUSION

KFAC and PC current applied with the same phase duration induced similar relative submaximal and maximum evoked-torque, efficiency, and perceived discomfort. However, currents with 500 µs induced higher evoked-torque, current efficiency, and perceived discomfort.

CONTRACTION FATIGUE, STRENGTH ADAPTATIONS, AND DISCOMFORT DURING CONVENTIONAL VERSUS WIDE-PULSE, HIGH-FREQUENCY, NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be delivered in a conventional form (CONVNMES) and using relatively wide-pulses and high-frequencies (WPHFNMES). WPHFNMES is proposed to reduce contraction fatigability and generate larger contractions with less discomfort than CONVNMES, however, there are no systematic reviews to guide the selection of NMES types. This systematic review compared the effects of CONVNMES versus WPHFNMES on contraction fatigability, strength adaptations, and perceived discomfort in clinical and non-clinical populations. Eight studies were included. When averaged across all non-clinical participants in individual short- and long-term studies, there was either no difference between CONVNMES and WPHFNMES for all outcomes or WPHFNMES produced more fatigability. In a subset of non-clinical participants ("responders"), however, WPHFNMES reduced contraction fatigability during a single session. Long-term studies found no differences between protocols for strength adaptations in non-clinical participants and those with multiple sclerosis. We concluded that WPHFNMES reduces contraction fatigability only in the short-term and in non-clinical responder participants and may exacerbate fatigability in non-responders. This review was registered in the prospective international registry of systematic reviews/PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42020153907, accessed at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/). Novelty bullets: • WPHF NMES may reduce fatigue in some participants and exacerbate fatigue in others. • There were no differences in long-term between WPHF and CONV NMES on strength adaptations. • Future high-quality research is needed to optimize outcomes of NMES-based programs.

Alternating Current Is More Fatigable Than Pulsed Current in People Who Are Healthy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVE

Tolerance level and rapid fatigue onset are limitations in the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as an electrotherapeutic resource in rehabilitation and training protocols; however, it is unclear if pulsed current (PC) and alternating current (AC) produce different fatigue levels when applied at submaximal contraction level. The purpose of this study was to compare fatigue and discomfort levels between PC and AC during a submaximal contraction protocol in people who are healthy.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized crossover trial conducted in a laboratory setting, 30 male volunteers [23.23 years of age (SD = 4.59)] performed 2 submaximal fatigue protocols (with a 7-day interval) in a randomized order: PC (pulse duration = 2 milliseconds, pulse frequency = 100 Hz) and AC (2.5 kHz, pulse duration = 0.4 milliseconds, burst frequency = 100 Hz). NMES currents were applied to the knee extensor motor point of the dominant limb. The NMES protocol consisted of 80 evoked contractions (time on:off = 5:10 seconds) and lasted 20 minutes. The current was maintained at a constant intensity throughout the NMES protocol. The primary outcome measures were maximal voluntary isometric contraction, fatigue index (evoked torque decline), fatigability (number of contractions for a 50% drop in evoked-torque from the protocol start), total evoked torque-time integral (TTI), decline in TTI, and discomfort level.

RESULTS

AC at 2.5 kHz demonstrated higher maximal voluntary isometric contraction decline post-fatigue, higher fatigue index, higher fatigability (ie, fewer contractions to reach the 50% evoked torque decline from the protocol start), smaller total TTI, and higher TTI decline compared with PC. No between-currents difference was observed in discomfort level.

CONCLUSION

PC is less fatigable than AC at 2.5 kHz.

IMPACT

Based on this study, PC is the preferred current choice when the NMES goal is to generate higher muscle work, higher mechanical load, and smaller fatigability during training both for athletes who are healthy and for rehabilitation programs for people with disease or injury.

The Effect of Quadriceps Muscle Length on Maximum Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Evoked Contraction, Muscle Architecture, and Tendon-Aponeurosis Stiffness

Muscle-tendon unit length plays a crucial role in quadriceps femoris muscle (QF) physiological adaptation, but the influence of hip and knee angles during QF neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is poorly investigated. We investigated the effect of muscle length on maximum electrically induced contraction (MEIC) and current efficiency. We secondarily assessed the architecture of all QF constituents and their tendon-aponeurosis complex (TAC) displacement to calculate a stiffness index. This study was a randomized, repeated measure, blinded design with a sample of twenty healthy men aged 24.0 ± 4.6. The MEIC was assessed in four different positions: supine with knee flexion of 60° (SUP60); seated with knee flexion of 60° (SIT60); supine with knee flexion of 20° (SUP20), and seated with knee flexion of 20° (SIT20). The current efficiency (MEIC/maximum tolerated current amplitude) was calculated. Ultrasonography of the QF was performed at rest and during NMES to measure pennation angle (θ p ) and fascicle length (L f ), and the TAC stiffness index. MEIC and current efficiency were greater for SUP60 and SIT60 compared to SUP20 and SIT20. The vastus lateralis and medialis showed lower θ p and higher L f at SUP60 and SIT60, while for the rectus femoris, in SUP60 there were lower θ p and higher L f than in all positions. The vastus intermedius had a similar pattern to the other vastii, except for lack of difference in θ p between SIT60 compared to SUP20 and SIT20. The TAC stiffness index was greater for SUP60. We concluded that NMES generate greater torque and current efficiency at 60° of knee flexion, compared to 20°. For these knee angles, lengthening the QF at the hip did not promote significant change. Each QF constituent demonstrated muscle physiology patterns according to hip and/or knee angles, even though a greater L f and lower θ p were predominant in SUP60 and SIT60. QF TAC index stiffened in more elongated positions, which probably contributed to enhanced force transmission and slightly higher torque in SUP60. Our findings may help exercise physiologist better understand the impact of hip and knee angles on designing more rational NMES stimulation strategies.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03822221.

Influence of Pulse Waveform and Frequency on Evoked Torque, Stimulation Efficiency, and Discomfort in Healthy Subjects

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the influence of neuromuscular electrical stimulation pulse waveform and frequency on evoked torque, stimulation efficiency, and discomfort at two neuromuscular electrical stimulation levels.

DESIGN

This is a repeated measures study. The quadriceps muscle of 24 healthy men was stimulated at submaximal (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub) and maximal (neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax) levels using two pulse waveforms (symmetrical, asymmetrical) and three pulse frequencies (60, 80, 100 Hz). Repeated measures analysis of variance and effect sizes were used to verify the effect of pulse waveform and pulse frequency on stimulation efficiency (evoked torque/current intensity) and discomfort and to assess the magnitude of the differences, respectively.

RESULTS

Stimulation efficiency was higher for symmetrical (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub = 0.88 ± 0.21 Nm/mA; neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax = 1.27 ± 0.46 Nm/mA) compared with asymmetrical (neuromuscular electrical stimulationsub = 0.77 ± 0.21 Nm/mA; neuromuscular electrical stimulationmax = 1.02 ± 0.34 Nm/mA; P ≤ 0.001; effect size = 0.56-0.66) but did not significantly differ between frequencies (P = 0.17). At both neuromuscular electrical stimulation levels, there were no statistically significant differences in discomfort between pulse waveforms or frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher stimulation efficiency of symmetrical pulses suggests that this waveform would be preferred to asymmetrical pulses in clinical practice. Stimulation frequencies between 60 and 100 Hz can be used interchangeably because of similar efficiency and discomfort.

Comparison between Russian and Aussie currents in the grip strength and thickness muscles of the non-dominant hand: A double-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study

Objectives

This study aims to compare the Russian and Aussie currents in the force gain and hypertrophy of the forearm muscles responsible for the grip.

Patients and methods

This double-blind, prospective, randomized-controlled study included a total of 30 healthy women (mean age: 20.2±1.7 years; range, 18 to 25 years) between May 2018 and July 2018. The participants were randomly divided into three groups: control group (CG, n=10), Aussie current group (ACG, n=10), and Russian current group (RCG, n=10). All three groups underwent a force test with a gripping dynamometer and the collection of images of the superficial and deep flexor muscles of the fingers with diagnostic ultrasound. The CG received a fictious current stimulus, while the other two groups received the designated stimuli from their currents. Further evaluations were performed after 24 h of the 12th application of the current.

Results

For grip, there were no significant differences in the moment of evaluation and interaction, while the effect size yielded certain points to advantages of force gain for the group using the RCG. The thickness of the superficial muscles showed a significant difference for the first evaluation between CG and RCG (p=0.014) and between RCG and ACG (p=0.010), indicating a larger effect size for RCG.

Conclusion

Our study results show that the Russian current is proven to be the mode which yields the most optimal results.

Limited Sensitivity of Hippocampal Synaptic Function or Network Oscillations to Unmodulated Kilohertz Electric Fields

Understanding the cellular mechanisms of kilohertz (kHz) electrical stimulation is of broad interest in neuromodulation including forms of transcranial electrical stimulation, interferential stimulation, and high-rate spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Yet, the well-established low-pass filtering by neuronal membranes suggests minimal neuronal polarization in respond to charge-balanced kHz stimulation. The hippocampal brain slice model is among the most studied systems in neuroscience and exhaustively characterized in screening the effects of electrical stimulation. High-frequency electric fields of varied amplitudes (1–150 V/m), waveforms (sinusoidal, symmetrical pule, asymmetrical pulse) and frequencies (1 and10 kHz) were tested. Changes in single or paired-pulse field EPSPs (fEPSP) in CA1 were measured in response to radial-directed and tangential-directed electric fields, with brief (30 s) or long (30 min) application times. The effects of kHz stimulation on ongoing endogenous network activity were tested in carbachol-induced γ oscillation of CA3a and CA3c. Across 23 conditions evaluated, no significant changes in fEPSP were resolved, while responses were detected for within-slice control direct current (DC) fields; 1-kHz sinusoidal and pulse stimulation (≥60 V/m), but not 10 kHz, induced changes in oscillating neuronal network. We thus report no responses to low-amplitude 1-kHz or any 10-kHz fields, suggesting that any brain sensitivity to these fields is via yet to be-determined mechanism(s) of action which were not identified in our experimental preparation.

Comparing Spatially Distributed and Single Electrode Stimulation on Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury

It is still a challenge to delay the onset of fatigue on muscle contraction induced by Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES). We explored the use of two stimulation methods with the same total area, single electrode stimulation (SES), and spatially distributed electrical stimulation (SDSS) during isometric knee extension with spinal cord injured (SCI) volunteers. We applied stimulation on the left and right quadriceps of two SCI participants with both methods and recorded isometric force and evoked electromyography (eEMG). We calculated the force-time integral (FTI) and eEMG-time integral (eTI) for each stimulation series and used a linear regression as a measure of decay ratio. Moreover, we also estimated the contribution from each channel from eEMG.

Russian and Low-Frequency Currents Induced Similar Neuromuscular Adaptations in Soccer Players: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation is widely used to induce muscular strength increase; however, no study has compared Russian current (RC) with pulsed current (PC) effects after a training program.

OBJECTIVES

We studied the effects of different neuromuscular electrical stimulation currents, RC, and PC on the neuromuscular system after a 6-week training period.

DESIGN

Blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS

A total of 27 male soccer players (age 22.2 [2.2] y, body mass 74.2 [10.0] kg, height 177 [0] cm, and body mass index 23.7 [2.9] kg/cm2 for the control group; 22.1 [3.1] y, 69.7 [5.7] kg, 174 [0] cm, and 23.0 [2.5] kg/cm for the PC group; and 23.0 [3.4] y, 72.1 [10.7] kg, 175 [0] cm, and 23.5 [3.4] kg/cm for the RC group) were randomized into 3 groups: (1) control group; (2) RC (2500 Hz, burst 100 Hz, and phase duration 200 μs); and (3) PC (100 Hz and 200 μs).

INTERVENTION

The experimental groups trained for 6 weeks, with 3 sessions per week with neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Maximal voluntary isometric contraction and evoked torque, muscle architecture, sensory discomfort (visual analog scale), and electromyographic activity were evaluated before and after the 6-week period.

RESULTS

Evoked torque increased in the RC (169.5% [78.2%], P < .01) and PC (248.7% [81.1%], P < .01) groups. Muscle thickness and pennation angle increased in the RC (8.7% [3.8%] and 16.7% [9.0%], P < .01) and PC (16.1% [8.0%] and 27.4% [11.0%], P < .01) groups. The PC demonstrated lower values for visual analog scale (38.8% [17.1%], P < .01). There was no significant time difference for maximal voluntary isometric contraction and root mean square values (P > .05). For all these variables, there was no difference between the RC and PC (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Despite the widespread use of RC in clinical practice, RC and PC training programs produced similar neuromuscular adaptations in soccer players. Nonetheless, as PC generated less perceived discomfort, it could be preferred after several training sessions.

Changes in microvascular oxygenation and total hemoglobin concentration of the vastus lateralis during neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)

Background and Introduction: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is predicated on eliciting muscle contractions and increasing muscle demand to promote increase in strength. Previous studies have shown differences in the magnitude of elicited force among various NMES waveforms but less is known about metabolic demand of muscle during NMES.Objective/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare elicited force and muscle metabolic demand during electrically elicited contractions using different NMES waveforms.Methods: A single-session repeated measures design was used. Electrically elicited force (EEF), microvascular oxygenation (SmO2), total hemoglobin concentration ([THC]) of the vastus lateralis, and subject tolerance (VAS score) were measured using three NMES waveforms; burst modulated alternating current (Russian), biphasic pulsed current (VMS®), and burst modulated biphasic pulsed current (VMS-burst®).Results: A significant main effect for waveform was noted for EEF (F = 12.693, p < .001), SmO2 (F = 8.340, p = .001), and VAS (F = 4.213, p = .025), but not [THC]. Compared to Russian current, VMS-burst and VMS resulted in significantly greater EEF (p = .001; p = .009) and local metabolic demand (i.e. decreased SmO2) (p = .005; p = .003), but not [THC]. VAS was significantly greater (p = .023) for VMS (4.2) compared to Russian (3.07) but not different between VMS-burst and Russian and VMS-burst and VMS.Conclusion: Greater muscle force and local metabolic demand were observed with VMS-burst and VMS compared to Russian current. These data provide novel evidence to guide clinical decision making when selecting an NMES waveform.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with Kilohertz Frequency Alternating Current to Enhance Sensorimotor Cortical Excitability

Enhancement of cortical excitability has been demonstrated to be beneficial for neural recovery of motor dysfunction, such as stroke and spinal cord injury. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been widely used to evoke limb movements, resulting in the increasing cortical excitability. Due to the advantages of low skin impedance and less discomfort, an alternative NMES of kilohertz frequency alternating current (KFAC) has been proposed, and the effects of current parameters on evoked torque has been studied. However, few studies concerned cortical excitability effects during KFAC-evoked limb movement. In this paper, we utilized the event-related spectral estimation (ERSP) to calculate the beta ERD values to investigate the effects of KFAC-evoked elbow flexion movement on cortical excitability and compared them with that of passive movement. Firstly, averaged ERSP values were extracted in beta band during elbow flexion movements by sliding a 2Hz wide window for all trails of each subject. And then the minimal value was chosen as the representative value of beta ERD. Finally, the absolute ERD values and the descending slopes of all subjects were both calculated for statistical analysis by one-way repeated measures ANOVA. The results showed KFAC can increase cortical excitability, especially with long pulse duration. Moreover, beta cortical activities during KFAC500-evoked movement are significantly activated than those during passive movement. Therefore, our study may provide a new NMES rehabilitation method to enhance cortical excitability for motor dysfunction patients.

Neuromuscular fatigue after low- and medium-frequency electrical stimulation in healthy adults

INTRODUCTION

In this study we investigated fatigue origins induced by low-frequency pulsed current (PC) and medium-frequency current (MF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) after a clinical-like session.

METHODS

Eleven healthy men randomly underwent 2 NMES sessions, PC and MF, on quadriceps muscle (15-minute duration, 6 seconds on and 18 seconds off). Maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), central activation ratio (CAR), vastus lateralis electromyographic activity (EMG), and evoked contractile properties were determined before and after the sessions. Evoked torque and discomfort during the sessions were also measured.

RESULTS

Both currents produced decreases in MVC, EMG, and evoked contractile properties after the sessions. No difference was found between currents for all variables (P > 0.05). Evoked torque during sessions decreased (P < 0.05). No difference was observed in mean evoked torque and discomfort (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Both currents induced similar neuromuscular fatigue. Clinicians can choose either PC or MF and expect similar treatment effects when the goal is to generate gains in muscle strength. Muscle Nerve 58: 293-299, 2018.

Comparison of the effects of kilohertz- and low-frequency electric stimulations: A systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether kilohertz-frequency alternating current (KFAC) is superior to low-frequency pulsed current (PC) in increasing muscle-evoked torque and lessening discomfort.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched for related articles, published before August 2017. Furthermore, citation search was performed on the original record using Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and within-subject repeated studies evaluating and comparing KFAC and PC treatments were included. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) of KFAC and PC treatments, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were calculated using the random effects model.

RESULTS

In total, 1148 potentially relevant articles were selected, of which 14 articles with within-subject repeated designs (271 participants, mean age: 26.4 years) met the inclusion criteria. KFAC did not significantly increase muscle-evoked torque, compared to PC (pooled SMD: -0.25; 95% CI: -0.53, 0.06; P = 0.120). KFAC had comparable discomfort compared to that experienced using PC (pooled SMD: -0.06; 95% CI: -0.50, 0.38; P = 0.800). These estimates of the effects had a high risk of bias, as assessed using the Downs and Black scale, and were highly heterogeneous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis does not establish that KFAC is superior to PC in increasing muscle-evoked torque and lessening discomfort level. However, no strong conclusion could be drawn because of a high risk of bias and a large amount of heterogeneity. High quality studies comparing the efficacy between PC and KFAC treatments with consideration of potential confounders is warranted to facilitate the development of effective treatment.

Low-Frequency Pulsed Current Versus Kilohertz-Frequency Alternating Current: A Scoping Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of low-frequency pulsed current versus kilohertz-frequency alternating current in terms of evoked force, discomfort level, current intensity, and muscle fatigability; to discuss the physiological mechanisms of each neuromuscular electrical stimulation type; and to determine if kilohertz-frequency alternating current is better than low-frequency pulsed current for clinical treatment.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were obtained from PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and SPORTSDiscus databases using the terms Russian current or kilohertz current or alternating current or pulsed current or Aussie current and torque or discomfort or fatigue or current intensity, and through citation tracking up to July 2017.

STUDY SELECTION

Two independent reviewers selected studies comparing the use of the 2 neuromuscular electrical stimulation currents. Studies describing maximal current intensity tolerated and the main effects of the 2 different current types on discomfort, muscle force, and fatigability were independently reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were systematized according to (1) methodology; (2) electrical current characteristics; and (3) outcomes on discomfort level, evoked force, current intensity, and muscle fatigability.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The search revealed 15 articles comparing the 2 current types. Kilohertz-frequency alternated current generated equal or less force, similar discomfort, similar current intensity for maximal tolerated neuromuscular electrical stimulation, and more fatigue compared with low-frequency pulsed current. Similar submaximal levels of evoked force revealed higher discomfort and current intensity for kilohertz-frequency alternated current compared with low-frequency pulsed current.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence does not support the idea that kilohertz-frequency alternated current is better than low-frequency pulsed current for strength training and rehabilitation.

Electrically Elicited Quadriceps Muscle Torque: A Comparison of 3 Waveforms

Study Design A controlled laboratory study, with a single-blind, block-randomization crossover design. Objectives To compare the electrically elicited knee extensor torque produced by 3 clinically available waveforms: 2500-Hz burst-modulated alternating current (BMAC), 1000-Hz BMAC, and 1000-Hz burst-modulated biphasic square-wave pulsed current (BMBPC). Background Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is the therapeutic use of electrical current to strengthen muscle. Muscle torque produced by NMES is limited by discomfort. Methods The knee extensor maximal volitional isometric torque (KEMVIT) of 33 able-bodied participants (18 female) was measured and used to normalize the electrically elicited knee extensor torque to produce a percent of KEMVIT (%KEMVIT). Electrically elicited isometric knee extensor torque was measured in response to each of the waveforms at the participants' maximum tolerance. Results The average maximum tolerated stimulation produced 32.0 ± 16.7 %KEMVIT with 2500-Hz BMAC, 38.2 ± 18.4 %KEMVIT with 1000-Hz BMAC, and 42.2 ± 17.1 %KEMVIT with 1000-Hz BMBPC. Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc testing revealed a statistically significant difference between 2500-Hz BMAC and 1000-Hz BMAC (P = .046), and between 2500-Hz BMAC and 1000-Hz BMBPC (P<.001). No statistically significant difference was found between 1000-Hz BMAC and 1000-Hz BMBPC (P = .267). Conclusion For eliciting maximum knee extensor muscle torque, 1000-Hz BMBPC and 1000-Hz BMAC were similarly effective, and 2500-Hz BMAC was less effective. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(3):217-224. Epub 19 Dec 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7601.

Clinical Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Neuromuscular Rehabilitation: What Are We Overlooking?

The clinical success of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for neuromuscular rehabilitation is greatly compromised by the poor consideration of different physiological and methodological issues that are not always obvious to the clinicians. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review is to reexamine some of these fundamental aspects of NMES using a tripartite model perspective. First, we contend that NMES does not actually bypass the central nervous system but results in a multitude of neurally mediated responses that contribute substantially to force generation and may engender neural adaptations. Second, we argue that too much emphasis is generally placed on externally controllable stimulation parameters while the major determinant of NMES effectiveness is the intrinsically determined muscle tension generated by the current (ie, evoked force). Third, we believe that a more systematic approach to NMES therapy is required in the clinic and this implies a better identification of the patient-specific impairment and of the potential "responders" to NMES therapy. On the basis of these considerations, we suggest that the crucial steps to ensure the clinical effectiveness of NMES treatment should consist of (1) identifying the neuromuscular impairment with clinical assessment and (2) implementing algorithm-based NMES therapy while (3) properly dosing the treatment with tension-controlled NMES and eventually amplifying its neural effects.