The Perfect Plane

Chronic pain and foreign body sensation based on mesh placement in primary ventral hernia repair: a systematic review highlighting the evidence gap and a call to action

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to investigate differences in chronic pain and foreign body sensation based on mesh placement, with recurrence as a secondary outcome.

METHODS

The review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024592114), and searches were conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL on October 3rd, 2024. Studies were included if they compared mesh placements, categorized as onlay, retromuscular, preperitoneal, or intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM), in primary ventral hernia repairs in adults. Chronic pain (≥ 6 months post-surgery) and foreign body sensation were the primary outcomes. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were included, while incisional hernias alone and animal studies were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs. Due to significant heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not feasible, and a narrative synthesis was provided.

RESULTS

A total of 6,562 records were screened, of which nine cohort studies and one RCT were included. Studies were heterogeneous and many did not aim to assess chronic pain as the primary outcome. Two studies reported significantly lower chronic pain rates with retromuscular mesh placement, but data pooling was not possible. Foreign body sensation could not be assessed because the only study reporting on this did not have extractable data.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there is insufficient evidence to favor one mesh placement over another for chronic pain or foreign body sensation. While crude rates suggest that retromuscular and preperitoneal placements may result in less chronic pain than onlay and IPOM, the evidence remains very uncertain due to significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Further research is warranted.

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) is a rare condition representing 1% of patients operated for endometriosis. We describe a case of a 26-year-old woman, with a history of cesarean delivery, who presented with cyclical pain and a subcutaneous mass in the lower abdomen. Where most AWE lesions may be surgically managed by a single surgeon, imaging revealed an unusually large lesion (13 × 4 × 10 cm) involving the rectus abdominis muscle. Plastic, gynecologic, and general surgeons combined their expertise to conduct AWE excision combined with miniabdominoplasty in a single procedure. After resection, a retrorectus mesh (Rives-Stoppa technique) reinforced the primarily closed posterior rectus sheath and an inlay mesh bridged the defect left in the anterior rectus sheath. The patient was discharged 3 days postoperatively, had minimal pain complaints, and was satisfied with cosmetic results at 1-month and later follow ups. One year postoperatively, she gave uncomplicated vaginal birth. We conclude that, in select cases, management of a large, symptomatic AWE may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach, where symptom relief and an aesthetically pleasing result for the patient can be achieved in a single procedure. We distinctively describe double mesh repair as a viable consideration for reconstruction in AWE and review current considerations in mesh repair of the abdominal wall. Further studies into this topic are warranted.

A comparative study between ETEP vs. IPOM repair for ventral hernia

BACKGROUND

Enhanced View Totally Extraperitoneal (eTEP) and Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) are two widely performed laparoscopic approaches for ventral hernia repair. This randomized prospective study aimed to compare these two techniques in terms of various clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients presenting with ventral hernias at our hospital between June 2022 and December 2023 were included in the study. All patients were fit for general anesthesia and were randomized into two groups, with 30 patients undergoing eTEP and 30 patients undergoing IPOM.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics such as age, sex, or comorbidities between the two groups. The operative time for eTEP was significantly longer, with a mean duration of 211 min compared to 177.5 min for IPOM (p < 0.001). Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements were significantly lower in the eTEP group. Two patients in the eTEP group required conversion to IPOM. No intraoperative complications occurred in either group. Two patients developed seromas on the seventh postoperative day, both of which were managed conservatively. The mean hospital stay was shorter for eTEP (3.43 days) compared to IPOM (6.16 days, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing eTEP had an earlier return to work and reported better abdominal wall quality of life. No recurrences were observed in either group during the six-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

eTEP repair for ventral hernias offers several advantages over the commonly performed IPOM technique, including reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster recovery. However, the choice of procedure should be guided by the surgeon's expertise and confidence in performing either technique.

Mesh exposure after ventral hernia repair with onlay biosynthetic mesh: a retrospective review of associated risk factors and management strategies

BACKGROUND

Although intraperitoneal and retromuscular mesh placement in ventral hernia repair (VHR) are associated with lower recurrence rates, the onlay plane remains a well-established option for certain clinical scenarios. A knowledge gap remains regarding resorbable biosynthetic onlay mesh and mesh exposure. We aim to determine exposure rate, risk factors, and treatment options.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center, two-surgeon retrospective review was performed examining patients who underwent VHR with onlay, Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh from 2015 to 2021. Demographics, operative characteristics, outcomes, and mesh exposure management were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 346 patients, 15 (4.3%) experienced mesh exposure. The mean age was 53 years and BMI of 33.6 kg/m2. Patients were majority ASA class 3 (65%), female (64.2%), and averaged a defect size of 307.9 ± 235.2 cm2. Independent risk factors included diabetes (AOR = 4.3,CI 1.5-12.5;p < 0.005) and COPD (AOR = 5.2,CI 1.3-21.8;p = 0.02). Mesh exposures were identified as outpatient (20%) or intraoperative (80%). All underwent operative debridement, in which nine were managed with skin reclosure, two with partial closure, and four healed by secondary intention. Five patients required excision of unincorporated mesh. Four patients required further debridement from chronic surgical site occurrences; however, all mesh exposure patents healed after a mean of 260.8 ± 313.2 days and retained original mesh. The recurrence rate was 6.7% for mesh exposure patients.

CONCLUSION

When faced with mesh exposure, resorbable biosynthetic mesh placed in onlay fashion was retained in all patients. Patients with a history of diabetes or COPD have increased risk of mesh exposure and should be counseled.

Ventral Hernia Repair With a Hybrid Absorbable-permanent Preperitoneal Mesh

OBJECTIVE

To analyze device safety and clinical outcomes of ventral hernia repair with the GORE SYNECOR Preperitoneal Biomaterial (PRE device), a permanent high-strength mesh with bioabsorbable web scaffold technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter retrospective review analyzed device/procedure endpoints and patient-reported outcomes in patients treated for hernia repair ≥1 year from study enrollment.

RESULTS

Included in this analysis were 148 patients with a mean age of 56 years; 66.2% met the Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 2 classification. Median hernia size was 30.0 cm 2 and 58.8% of patients had an incisional hernia. Repairs were primarily a robotic (53.4%) or open approach (41.9%). All meshes were placed extraperitoneal. Procedure-related adverse events within 30 days occurred in 13 (8.8%) patients and included 7 (4.8%) patients with surgical site infection, 2 (1.4%) with surgical site occurrence (SSO), 4 (2.7%) requiring readmission, and 3 (2.0%) who had reoperation. The rate of SSO events requiring procedural intervention was 2.7% (4 patients) through 30 days and 3.4% (5 patients) at 12 months. The rate of procedure-related surgical site infection remained at 4.8% through 12 months (no further reports after 30 d) and 3.4% for SSO (2 reports after 30 d). There were no site-reported clinically diagnosed hernia recurrences throughout the study. Median patient follow-up including in-person visit, physical examination, reported adverse event, explant, death, and questionnaire response was 28 months (n = 148). Median patient follow-up with patient questionnaire was 36 months (n = 88).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the PRE device, which incorporates the proven advantages of both an absorbable synthetic mesh and the long-term durability of a permanent macroporous mesh, is safe and effective in complex ventral hernia repairs. When used in the retromuscular space, the combination of these 2 materials had lower wound complications and recurrence rates than either type of material alone.

Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair-Experience From the First 160 Consecutive Operations With Lateral eTEP and eTAR Techniques

Introduction

There is a growing consensus on the benefits of retro-muscular (RM) mesh positioning, highlighted by its recommendation in the latest edition of EHS guidelines. The eTEP method has facilitated minimally invasive hernia repairs with retro-muscular mesh placement. With the increasing availability of robotic systems, there has been a corresponding increase in robotic adaptations of minimally invasive techniques involving retro-muscular mesh placement.

Materials and Methods

All patients who underwent robotic ventral hernia repair using the lateral extraperitoneal eTEP technique at Kempten Hospital between September 2019 and December 2023 were includes in the study. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative parameters, postoperative parameters, and hernia-specific parameters, were retrospectively analyzed using the hospital information system.

Results

160 patients were operated using a lateral approach eTEP technique during the observation period, 111 (69.38%) for incisional hernia repair and 49 (30.63%) for primary hernia repair. 43 cases required TAR (30 unilateral TAR and 13 bilateral TAR). 139 patients had a medial (86.98%), seven patients (4.14%) a lateral and 14 patients (8.88%) a combined hernia defect. The median operative time was 143 min (range: 53 min-495 min). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (range: 2-16). There was one intraoperative complication. The postoperative complication rate was 6.25% (10 patients), with 1.72% (2 patients) requiring reoperation. Sonographic follow-up examinations revealed seromas in 5 patients, with 4 located in the retromuscular mesh space and 1 in the former hernia sac. None of these seromas required surgical intervention.

Conclusion

The "lateral approach" of robotic eTEP provides a safe surgical method for treating ventral hernias using minimally invasive techniques and mesh augmentation in the retro-muscular space. Further studies are necessary to compare extraperitoneal with transperitoneal methods.

The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal repair of abdominal bulge after DIEP flap breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a case report

BACKGROUND

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for autologous breast reconstruction is associated with higher patient satisfaction and fewer abdominal morbidities at the donor site than the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. However, abdominal bulging occurs at a certain frequency, and there is no established treatment. Here, we present a case of laparoscopic hernia repair using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) method in a patient with a lower abdominal bulge after DIEP flap reconstruction.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old woman underwent left nipple-sparing mastectomy, left axillary lymph node dissection, and breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap for left breast cancer 3 years previously. We performed an eTEP method for an abdominal bulge. The absence of a hernia sac facilitated dissection of the retrorectal space, and a left-sided transversus abdominis release was performed, followed by mesh placement. No postoperative abdominal bulging was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the eTEP method for repairing an abdominal bulge after DIEP flap reconstruction is advantageous because it facilitates a relatively straightforward dissection of a wide area of the retrorectal space without a hernia sac.

"Fully endoscopic preperitoneal ascending suprapubic approach for minimally invasive repair of anterior and lateral abdominal wall hernias"

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to describe the rational, feasibility and clinical and Quality-of-life improvement results of a fully endoscopic preperitoneal repair for midline and lateral abdominal wall hernias, starting from the space of Retzius in a "bottom-to-up" approach.

METHODS

An observational prospective data-collected and quality of life study is performed in selected patients with less than 10 cm. in diameter midline and lateral abdominal wall hernias. A suprapubic upward e-TEP technique from a previously dissected Retzius space, is performed in all cases. The surgical goal is to perform a total free-tension abdominal wall reconstruction followed by a prosthetic hernioplasty. Clinical Data is classified in preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, including a quality-of-life clinical evaluation based on an improvement of HerQLes score.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients underwent this approach from September 2017 to October 2022 in a single-surgeon practice. A total restoration of the previous abdominal wall anatomy and a prosthetic repair were achieved in all cases. The mean operative time was 142.53 min, with a significant shorter time in lateral hernias approach. Minor complications (Clavien-Dindo I) were collected in 10% of the patients. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo IIIb) occurred in 6.66% of the patients. The mean pain at discharge was 1.83 VAS, with a significant lower pain in M-eTEP approach for lateral hernias. The mean hospital stay was 42.4 h. No seroma, hematoma, chronic pain, or recurrence was observed in the mean follow-up (20.33 months). A clinical and quality of life improvement was found in 92.9% of the patients, measured by a minimal clinical important difference (MCID) between preoperative and postoperative HerQLes score.

CONCLUSION

Despite being a technically demanding approach, the results obtained by this approach are compatible in safety and feasibility with other minimally invasive preperitoneal hernia repair techniques, in addition to obtaining a significant improvement in the quality of life of patients.

Computational analysis of electrical stimulation to promote tissue healing for hernia repair at varying mesh placement planes

Development of a tear in the abdominal wall allowing for protrusion of intra-abdominal contents is known as a hernia. This can cause pain, discomfort, and may need surgical repair. Hernias can affect people of any age or demographic. In the USA, over 1 million hernia repair procedures are performed each year. During these surgeries, it is common for a mesh to be utilized to strengthen the repair. Different techniques allow for the mesh to be placed in different anatomical planes depending on hernia location and approach. The locations are onlay, inlay, and sublay, with sublay being split into retromuscular or preperitoneal with sublay being the most commonly used. The use of an electrically active hernia repair mesh is of interest to model as electrical stimulation has been shown to improve soft tissue healing which could reduce recurrence rates. Theoretical 3D COMSOL models were built to evaluate the varying electric fields of an electrically active hernia repair mesh at each of the different anatomical planes. Three voltages were chosen (10, 20, and 30 mV) for the study to simulate a low-level electrical signal and the electric field from a piezoelectric material at the tissue layers surrounding the mesh construct. Based on the model outputs, the optimal mesh placement location was the sublay-retromuscular as this location had the highest electric field values in the connective tissues and rectus abdominis muscle, which are the primary tissues of concern for the healing process and a successful repair.

[Ventral Hernia Repair in Endoscopically Total Extrapertoneal Technique (eTEP) - Evaluation of Postoperative Outcome and One Year Follow-up]

BACKGROUND

Several recent meta-analyses have identified the retromuscular plane as the preferred mesh position in ventral hernia repair. Open surgery used to be the standard technique for these procedures. However, new minimally invasive techniques with totally extraperitoneal access and mesh positioning in the retromuscular plane have evolved.

METHODS

Between September 2018 and March 2019, 18 consecutive patients with ventral hernia were treated endoscopically in the totally extraperitoneal technique. Depending on the localisation and size of the hernia, the appropriate access was chosen and an uncoated mesh was placed in the retromuscular space in all patients. Data of patients' characteristics as well as peri- and postoperative parameters were collected. One year after surgery, patients were asked about recurrence, pain and complications, using the questionnaire of the herniamed data base.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications were noted. Postoperatively, there was one retromuscular seroma that did not need treatment, one temporary paralysis of the radial nerve and one pulmonary embolism. None of these complications led to persistent problems. 17 of 18 patients were available for follow-up. One year follow-up showed no hernia recurrence. One patient had pain at rest requiring treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernia surgery is a safe and promising new technique that is also feasible in complex hernias and with satisfactory 1 year results. This technique can combine the advantages of minimally invasive surgery with those of extraperitoneal mesh placement.

The evolution of incisional hernia repair in Spain. A comparative analysis of results from the EVEREG registry

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the EVEREG registry in evaluating the evolution of surgical treatment for incisional hernia and its outcomes in Spain by comparing data from 2 study periods.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative analysis of hernia surgeries performed between 2011 and 2015 (first period) and between 2017 and 2022 (second period) was conducted using data collected from the EVEREG registry.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were observed in the second cohort, including: a decrease in minimally invasive procedures (11.7% vs 8.2%; P < .001), an increase in emergency surgeries for males (31.7% vs 41.2%; P = .017), an increase in trocar hernia repairs (16% vs 26.2%; P < .0001), a reduction in suture repairs (2.8% vs 1.5%; P < .0001), and an increase in retromuscular techniques (36.4% vs 52.4%; P < .001) in open surgery with mesh. In elective surgery, there was a decrease in the average length of stay (4.9 vs 3.8 days; P < .0001), the percentage of complications (27.9% vs 24.0%; P < .0001), reoperations (3.5% vs 1.4%; P < .0001), and mortality (0.6% vs 0.2%; P = .002). Long-term outcomes included a decrease in recurrences after 12 months (20.7% vs 14.5%; P < .0001) and in chronic pain (13.7% vs 2.5%; P < .0001) and chronic infections (9.1% vs 14.5%; P < .0001) after 6 months.

CONCLUSION

In recent years, there has been a significant improvement in the outcomes of incisional hernia treatment. The registry serves as a fundamental tool for assessing the evolution of hernia treatment and enables the identification of key areas for improvement and the evaluation of treatment outcomes.

Does intraperitoneal mesh increase the risk of bowel obstruction? A nationwide French analysis

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernias are associated with a reduced quality of life. Mesh reinforcement of the abdominal wall is the current standard for incisional hernia repair (IHR), since it reduces the risk of recurrence. The best position for the mesh remains controversial, and each position has advantages and disadvantages.

OBJECTIVE

In this nationwide population-based study, we aimed to determine whether IHR with intraperitoneal mesh is associated with an increased risk of bowel obstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the French hospital database (PMSI), which collects data from all public and private hospitals, two patient cohorts were created and compared. Patients having undergone a laparoscopic IHR with intraperitoneal mesh (IPOM) in 2013 or 2014 due to a laparotomy performed in the 4 previous years were the IPOM group. Patients hospitalized for any other acute disease (i.e., without IHR) in 2013 and 2014, but having a similar laparotomy in the 4 previous years were the control group. Both cohorts were followed until 2019 in search of any episode of bowel obstruction.

RESULTS

A total of 815 patients were included in the IPOM group and matched to 1630 control patients. The 5 year bowel obstruction rate was 7.36% in the IPOM group and 4.42% in the control group (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment on age and obesity, incisional hernia repair with laparoscopic IPOM increased the risk of bowel obstruction in the 5 years following surgery (HR = 1.712; 95% CI 1.208-2.427; p = 0.0025).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients having undergone laparoscopic IPOM have an increased risk of bowel obstruction compared with patients who have a similar surgical history but no IHR.

Soft, Long-Lived, Bioresorbable Electronic Surgical Mesh with Wireless Pressure Monitor and On-Demand Drug Delivery

Current research in the area of surgical mesh implants is somewhat limited to traditional designs and synthesis of various mesh materials, whereas meshes with multiple functions may be an effective approach to address long-standing challenges including postoperative complications. Herein, a bioresorbable electronic surgical mesh is presented that offers high mechanical strength over extended timeframes, wireless post-operative pressure monitoring, and on-demand drug delivery for the restoration of tissue structure and function. The study of materials and mesh layouts provides a wide range of tunability of mechanical and biochemical properties. Dissolvable dielectric composite with porous structure in a pyramidal shape enhances sensitivity of a wireless capacitive pressure sensor, and resistive microheaters integrated with inductive coils provide thermo-responsive drug delivery system for an antibacterial agent. In vivo evaluations demonstrate reliable, long-lived operation, and effective treatment for abdominal hernia defects, by clear evidence of suppressed complications such as adhesion formation and infections.

Association of active smoking on 30-day wound events and additional morbidity and mortality following inguinal hernia repair with mesh: an analysis of the ACHQC database

BACKGROUND

To date, there is limited data on the association of active smoking and 30-day wound events following inguinal hernia repair (IHR) with mesh. We aimed to determine if active smoking at the time of IHR with mesh was associated with worse 30-days wound events and additional morbidity outcomes using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database.

METHODS

All adult patients undergoing elective, IHR with mesh who had 30-day follow-up data available were identified within the ACHQC database. Smokers were defined as having used nicotine within the 30 days prior to surgery. A 1:1 propensity score matched analysis was performed comparing smokers to non-smokers, controlling for factors previously shown to be associated with postoperative wound events. The effect of smoking on 30-day wound events and additional morbidity outcomes following IHR with mesh was investigated using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical data and Wilcoxon ranked test for continuous data.

RESULTS

A total of 17,543 patients met inclusion criteria; 1855 (11%) were active smokers at the time of minimally invasive IHR with mesh. A total of 3694 patients were used for the matched analysis. There were no statistically significant differences between the non-smokers and smokers with respect to the incidence of surgical site infection (p = 0.10), surgical site occurrences (p = 0.22), or surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (p = 0.64). Non-smokers were significantly more likely to be readmitted to the hospital and had significantly less improvement in all pain domains following IHR with mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

Active smoking at the time of IHR with mesh is not associated with worse 30-day wound or additional morbidity and mortality outcomes. Based on these results, preoperative smoking cessation for all patients undergoing IHR may not reduce 30-day morbidity.

Robotic approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair may be associated with improved wound morbidity in high-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Retromuscular sublay (RMS) technique for repair of ventral hernias has gained popularity due to lower risk of recurrence and wound complications. Robotic approaches to RMS have been shown to decrease hospital stay; however, previous studies have failed to show a significant reduction in wound morbidity. Utilizing the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database, this study sought to determine the effect of robotic approach on wound morbidity, while specifically focusing on a high-risk population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of elective robotic and open RMS repairs in the ACHQC database was performed. Patients deemed to be high-risk for wound complications were included: adult patients with BMI greater than 35 and who were either current smokers or diabetics. A propensity score match was then done to balance covariates between the two groups. Main outcomes of concern were surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), and surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) at 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 917 patients met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 211 patients matched for each approach. There was no difference in overall SSO (18% for Open vs 23% for Robotic, p = 0.23). Open repair was associated with higher rates of SSI (4% vs 1%, p = 0.032) and SSOPI (9% SSOPI vs 3%, p < 0. 015). As seen in previous studies, there was a higher rate of seroma associated with Robotic RMS repair (87% vs 48%, p < 0.001) in patients that developed an SSO.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, a robotic approach was associated with decreased rates of SSI and SSOPI in obese patients who were either current smokers or diabetics. In effort to reduce wound morbidity and the associated physical and economic costs, robotic approach for retromuscular ventral hernia repair should be considered in this patient population.

Investigation of optimal hernia repair techniques in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Multiple laparotomies, immunosuppressive therapy, wound infection, and malnutrition are risk factors for incisional hernia development, which places inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at high risk. With advances in minimally invasive techniques, this study assesses incisional hernia repair techniques and complications in the IBD population.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of adults with IBD who underwent incisional hernia repair from 2008 to 2022. Complications relative to operative approach and mesh placement location were assessed using descriptive and univariate statistics.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight IBD patients underwent incisional hernia repair. Fifty-two (59.1%) were on immunomodulators and 30 (34.1%) were repaired primarily. Thirty-five (39.7%) hernias recurred, of whom 19 (33%) had mesh placed. Three (30%) occurred in onlay repairs and 16 (33%) occurred in underlay repairs. Subdivision of underlay repairs into intraperitoneal, preperitoneal and retrorectus mesh placement revealed recurrence rates of 35.1%, 50%, and 14.3%, respectively. Patients with open repair were more likely to have intraoperative bowel injury (28.6% vs 9.7%, p = 0.041) and develop postoperative seromas/abscesses (12.5% vs 0%, p = 0.001) and wound complications (17.9% vs 0%, p = 0.012) compared to laparoscopic. Seromas/abscesses developed more frequently in onlay repairs compared to underlay (40% vs 2.13%, p = 0.001). Twelve (13.6%) patients presented with postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO), 7 (58.3%) of whom had mesh placed, and 6 (85.7%) were underlay. All SBO after underlay repair had intraperitoneally placed mesh. When comparing surgeons, hernias were more likely to recur performed by colorectal surgeons compared to hernia surgeons (63.3% vs 21.3%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In IBD patients, minimally invasive approaches lead to fewer perioperative complications compared to open. Underlay mesh placement demonstrated decreased incidence of seroma/abscess formation compared to onlay. When sub-grouped, underlay placements were similar in terms of complications. Retrorectus placement, however, had fewer recurrences and no readmissions for SBO. This suggests a minimally invasive approach or placement of retrorectus mesh may provide the optimal repair in this patient population.

[Roboticassisted incisional hernia surgery-Retromuscular techniques]

The trend to minimally invasive surgery has also made its way into the surgical treatment of incisional hernias. Unlike other areas of visceral surgery, recent years have seen a resurgence of open sublay repair in incisional hernia procedures, primarily due to the recognition of the retromuscular layer as the optimal mesh placement site. Additionally, with the growing availability of robotic systems in visceral surgery, these procedures are increasingly being offered in the form of minimally invasive procedures. These methods can be categorized based on the access routes: robotic-assisted transperitoneal procedures (e.g., r‑Rives, r‑TARUP, r‑TAR) and total extraperitoneal hernia repair (e.g., r‑eTEP, r‑eTAR). Notably, the introduction of transversus abdominis muscle release enables the robotic-assisted treatment of larger and more complex hernia cases with complete fascial closure. With respect to the comparison with open surgery required in retromuscular hernia treatment, the currently available literature on incisional hernia repair seems to show initial advantages of robotic-assisted surgery in the perioperative course. New technologies create new possibilities. In the context of surgical training the use of surgical robot systems with double consoles opens up completely new perspectives. Furthermore, the robot enables the implementation of models of artificial intelligence and augmented reality and could therefore open up novel dimensions in surgery.

Ventral Hernia Repair: Does Mesh Position Matter?

Mesh positioning is a commonly discussed detail in ventral hernia repair and is often cited as a major contributor to the outcome of the operation. However, there is a paucity of data that establishes one plane as superior to others. In this article, we will provide an overview of all potential planes to place prosthetic material and review the relevant literature supporting each option and the complications associated with accessing each anatomic plane.

Primary Ventral Hernia Repair and the Risk of Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Intra Versus Extraperitoneal Mesh

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the likelihood of bowel obstruction according to the placement of the mesh (either intraperitoneal or extraperitoneal) in ventral hernia repairs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups, an intraperitoneal (IP) group (mesh placed by laparoscopy or with an open approach) and an extraperitoneal (EP) group, all operated on in the Digestive Surgery Department at the Dijon University Hospital. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an episode of bowel obstruction requiring hospitalization and confirmed by abdominal CT scan.

RESULTS

Between March 2008 and July 2021, 318 patients were included, with 99 patients in the EP group (71 meshes placed preperitoneally and 28 placed retromuscularly) and 219 patients in the IP group (175 patients operated on laparoscopically versus 44 patients by direct approach). Three patients presented an episode of acute intestinal obstruction, with no difference between the two groups (p = 0.245), although all bowel obstructions occurred in the IP group and with the laparoscopic approach (1.7% of patients operated on by laparoscopy). The occlusive events occurred at 1 month, 2 years, and 3 years. There was no difference in terms of recurrence or postoperative chronic pain. There were more seroma and mesh infections in the EP group (p < 0.05). Two patients operated on by laparoscopy had undetected bowel injuries, prompting emergent surgery for peritonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant difference was found in terms of bowel obstruction between the intraperitoneal and the extraperitoneal position, but all cases of obstruction happened in the intraperitoneal mesh group. Visceral lesions remain a major complication of the laparoscopic approach that should not be neglected.

A comparison of clinical outcomes and costs between robotic and open ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

As robotic ventral hernia repair(VHR) adoption increases, real-world evidence is needed to ensure appropriate utilization.

METHODS

Data for open and robotic VHR(OVHR, RVHR) was retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes and costs were compared via inverse probability treatment weighting using propensity scores to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated for RVHR.

RESULTS

675 open and 609 robotic ventral hernia repairs were included. Demographics and hernia characteristics were comparable. Complications rates were lower in RVHR(p < 0.001). Clavien-Dindo grade-III complications were lower in RVHR(13.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.001). RVHR resulted in fewer surgical site events(21.5% vs. 12.2%, p < 0.001). Recurrence rates were greater in OVHR(8.9% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). The higher RVHR hospital costs (Δ = $2456, p = 0.005) were balanced by the lower post-discharge costs, compared to OVHR(Δ = $799, p = 0.023). Total costs did not differ(Δ = $1656 p = 0.081).

CONCLUSION

Although hospital costs were higher, post-discharge expenses favored RVHR due to the lower postoperative complications, which lead to comparable total costs to OVHR.

Predicting rare outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction using image-based deep learning models

BACKGROUND

Deep learning models with imbalanced data sets are a challenge in the fields of artificial intelligence and surgery. The aim of this study was to develop and compare deep learning models that predict rare but devastating postoperative complications after abdominal wall reconstruction.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify abdominal wall reconstruction patients with preoperative computed tomography scans. Conventional deep learning models were developed using an 8-layer convolutional neural network and a 2-class training system (ie, learns negative and positive outcomes). Conventional deep learning models were compared to deep learning models that were developed using a generative adversarial network anomaly framework, which uses image augmentation and anomaly detection. The primary outcomes were receiver operating characteristic values for predicting mesh infection and pulmonary failure.

RESULTS

Computed tomography scans from 510 patients were used with a total of 10,004 images. Mesh infection and pulmonary failure occurred in 3.7% and 5.6% of patients, respectively. The conventional deep learning models were less effective than generative adversarial network anomaly for predicting mesh infection (receiver operating characteristic 0.61 vs 0.73, P < .01) and pulmonary failure (receiver operating characteristic 0.59 vs 0.70, P < .01). Although the conventional deep learning models had higher accuracies/specificities for predicting mesh infection (0.93 vs 0.78, P < .01/.96 vs .78, P < .01) and pulmonary failure (0.88 vs 0.68, P < .01/.92 vs .67, P < .01), they were substantially compromised by decreased model sensitivity (0.25 vs 0.68, P < .01/.27 vs .73, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional deep learning models, generative adversarial network anomaly deep learning models showed improved performance on imbalanced data sets, predominantly by increasing model sensitivity. Understanding patients who are at risk for rare but devastating postoperative complications can improve risk stratification, resource utilization, and the consent process.

Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Retrorectus Self-Adhering Mesh: A Single-Center Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Mesh repair has been demonstrated to be superior to suture alone in ventral hernia repair. In a previous short-term pilot study, the authors found lower postoperative narcotic requirements with self-adhering mesh. The aim of this study was to follow-up on that pilot study, using long-term data.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. All patients who underwent ventral hernia repair with retrorectus mesh and who had at least a 12-month follow-up were reviewed. Comparisons were performed between patients who received self-adhering mesh and those who received transfascially sutured mesh, using matched-pair analysis, examining perioperative outcomes, surgical-site occurrences, and hernia recurrence/bulge.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were included in the study, with 21 patients undergoing repair with transfascially sutured mesh and 21 patients receiving self-adhering mesh. Average length of follow-up was 1078 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics. Patients receiving self-adhering mesh had significantly shorter surgery, and a shorter hospital length of stay. They also had a tendency toward lower narcotic requirements. There were no significant differences in the rate of surgical-site occurrences, hernia recurrences, or bulge between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term study shows that self-adhering mesh in ventral hernia repair results in similar long-term outcomes to transfascially sutured mesh, with shorter surgery, shorter length of stay, and a tendency toward improved pain control. These findings mirror the known advantages of self-adhering mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Further research is needed to study the incidence of chronic pain and the cost-effectiveness of self-adhering mesh.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

[Robot-assisted extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair-Experience from the first 61 consecutive operations with eTEP and eTAR techniques]

BACKGROUND

As in many other fields of surgery, robotically assisted surgical procedures have been established in the treatment of ventral hernias in recent years. The use of the robot can combine the demands of a minimally invasive approach and retromuscular mesh placement. In addition to a transabdominal approach, these procedures can also be performed using an extraperitoneal approach.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that robotic total extraperitoneal management of abdominal wall hernias is safe and efficient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all robotically operated patients on ventral hernia using extraperitoneal eTEP technique from September 2019 to May 2022 was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 61 ventral hernias were operated on using the robotic eTEP technique during the study period. In 14 patients retro-rectal dissection was extended laterally by an extraperitoneal transversus abdominis release (eTAR) because of the hernia size or a lateral hernia localization. In all cases, an uncoated synthetic mesh was placed in the retromuscular position with complete closure of the hernia defects. The median hernia defect area was 30 cm² (4-308 cm²). The median mesh size was 540 cm² (300-1350 cm²). The median mesh defect ratio (MDR) was 17.78 (3.06-145). One intraoperative and three postoperative complications were encountered. Neither conversion nor reoperation were required.

CONCLUSION

The robotic extraperitoneal eTEP technique enables the required retromuscular mesh placement in a minimally invasive approach. With the possibility of a combination with a transversus abdominis release, even complex findings can be treated using this technique.

State-of-the-art abdominal wall reconstruction and closure

Open ventral hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed by general surgeons. Appropriate patient selection and preoperative optimization are important to ensure high-quality outcomes and prevent hernia recurrence. Preoperative adjuncts such as the injection of botulinum toxin and progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum are proven to help achieve fascial closure in patients with hernia defects and/or loss of domain. Operatively, component separation techniques are performed on complex hernias in order to medialize the rectus fascia and achieve a tension-free closure. Other important principles of hernia repair include complete reduction of the hernia sac, wide mesh overlap, and techniques to control seroma and other wound complications. In the setting of contamination, a delayed primary closure of the skin and subcutaneous tissues should be considered to minimize the chance of postoperative wound complications. Ultimately, the aim for hernia surgeons is to mitigate complications and provide a durable repair while improving patient quality of life.

Short-term complications after onlay versus preperitoneal mesh repair of umbilical hernias: a prospective randomized double-blind trial

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of surgical site occurrences (SSOs) following onlay versus preperitoneal mesh placement in elective open umbilical hernia repairs.

METHODS

This study presents a secondary analysis of a randomized double-blind trial conducted on female patients with primary umbilical hernias admitted to a general hospital, in a residency training program setting. Fifty-six subjects were randomly assigned to either onlay (n=30) or preperitoneal (n=26) mesh repair group. Data on baseline demographics, past medical history, perioperative details, postoperative pain (visual analogue scale (VAS)), wound-related complications, and recurrence were assessed using a standardized protocol.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding patients' demographics, comorbidities, or defect size. Operative time averaged 67.5 (28-110) min for onlay and 50.5 (31-90) min for preperitoneal repairs, p=.03. The overall rate of SSOs was 21.4% (n=12), mainly in the onlay group (33% vs 7.7%; p=0.02, 95% CI 0.03-0.85) and mostly due to seromas. There were no between-group significant differences in postoperative VAS scores at all timepoints. After a maximum follow-up of 48 months, one recurrence was reported in the onlay group. By logistic regression, the onlay technique was the only independent risk factor for SSOs.

CONCLUSION

The presented data identified a decreased wound morbidity in preperitoneal umbilical hernia repairs, thus contributing to the limited body of evidence regarding mesh place selection in future guidelines. Further cases from this ongoing study and completion of follow-up are expected to also compare both techniques in terms of long-term outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) UTN code: U1111-1205-0065 (date of registration: March 27, 2018).

Establishment of minimally invasive ventral hernia repair with extraperitoneal mesh placement in a primary care hospital using the robotic platform

Background

The progressive availability of robotic surgical systems opens new perspectives in abdominal wall surgery due to excellent visibility and dexterity of instruments. While complex hernias until today were treated primarily through an open access, we evaluated if this promising technology is suitable for treating the entire spectrum of a hernia center, including complex hernias.

Material/methods

In 2017, minimally invasive hernia surgery with extraperitoneal mesh placement was started in Kempten hospital. Since 2019, a Da Vinci X system has been available for this purpose. In order to observe the process of transition we retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent ventral hernia repair in the department of general and visceral surgery at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 and were indicated for mesh implantation.

Results

In 2016, the percentage of minimally invasive procedures was 37.3%. In all of these cases an intraperitoneal mesh was implanted into the abdominal cavity. Open surgery was performed in 62.7%, of which an a retromuscular mesh was implanted in 75.7%, an intraperitoneal mesh in 21.6%, and an onlay mesh in 2.7%. In 2020, minimally invasive surgery accounted for 87.5%, of which 85.7% were performed robotically and 14.3 laparoscopically. In 94.3% of these minimally invasively treated patients the mesh was implanted in extraperitoneal position (75.8% in retromuscular and 24.2% in preperitoneal position). The percentage of complex hernias increased from 20.3% to 35.0% during the same period.

Conclusion

The majority of ventral hernia procedures can be performed safely using the robot in a minimally invasive technique with extraperitoneal mesh placement without leading to an increase in complications. Robotically-assisted hernia repair is a promising new technique that is also practical for complex hernias.

Our first Pfannenstiel incisional hernia. A case report

The incidence of the Pfannenstiel incisional hernia (IH) is the lowest of all IHs, it can occur due to patient-related factors or faulty technique in closure of the deeper layer. The use of prosthetic mesh repair is heralding a new era of tension-free herniorrhaphy, while the optimal location for its implantation remains controversial. As a result, no strategy or technique has become the gold standard for its repair. We report our first experience with an IH through Pfannenstiel in a 49-year-old obese female patient. Inlay polypropylene open mesh repair was performed. As the only complication, the patient presented with a seroma in the wound, which was aspirated, and she is currently asymptomatic with outpatient consultation follow-up. Pfannenstiel IHs have received minimal attention on the optimal surgical approach and postoperative results, making this case a good starting point for future studies.

Reoperation Through a Prosthetic-Reinforced Abdominal Wall and Its Association With Postoperative Outcomes and Longitudinal Health Care Utilization

Importance

Prosthetic reinforcement of critically sized incisional hernias is necessary to decrease hernia recurrence, but long-term prosthetic-mesh footprint may increase complication risk during subsequent abdominal operations.

Objective

To investigate the association of prior incisional hernia repair with mesh (IHRWM) with postoperative outcomes and health care utilization after common abdominal operations.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a population-based, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing inpatient abdominal surgical procedures during the period of January 2009 to December 2016, with at least 1 year of follow-up within 5 geographically diverse statewide inpatient/ambulatory databases (Florida, Iowa, Nebraska, New York, Utah). History of an abdominal operation was ascertained within the 3-year period preceding the index operation. Patients admitted to the hospital with a history of an abdominal operation (ie, bariatric, cholecystectomy, small- or large-bowel resection, prostatectomy, gynecologic) were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. Patients with prior IHRWM were propensity score matched (1:1) to controls both with and without a history of an abdominal surgical procedure based on clinical and operative characteristics. Data analysis was conducted from March 1 to November 27, 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite of adverse postoperative outcomes (surgical and nonsurgical). Secondary outcomes included health care utilization determined by length of hospital stay, hospital charges, and 1-year readmissions. Logistic and Cox regression determined the association of prior IHRWM with the outcomes of interest. Additional subanalyses matched and compared patients with prior IHR without mesh (IHRWOM) to those with a history of an abdominal operation.

Results

Of the 914 105 patients undergoing common abdominal surgical procedures (81 123 bariatric [8.9%], 284 450 small- or large-bowel resection [31.1%], 223 768 cholecystectomy [24.5%], 33 183 prostatectomy [3.6%], and 291 581 gynecologic [31.9%]), all 3517 patients (age group: 46-55 years, 1547 [44.0%]; 2396 majority sex [68.1%]) with prior IHRWM were matched to patients without a history of abdominal surgical procedures. After matching, prior IHRWM was associated with increased overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.27-1.60), surgical complications (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34-1.70), length of hospital stay (mean increase of 1.03 days; 95% CI, 0.56-1.49 days; P < .001), index admission charges (predicted mean difference of $11 896.10; 95% CI, $6096.80-$17 695.40; P < .001), and 1-year unplanned readmissions (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002). This trend persisted even when comparing matched patients with prior IHRWM to patients with a history of abdominal surgical procedures, and the treatment outcome disappeared when comparing patients with prior IHRWOM to those without a previous abdominal operation.

Conclusions and Relevance

Reoperation through a previously prosthetic-reinforced abdominal wall was associated with increased surgical complications and health care utilization. This risk appeared to be independent of a history of abdominal surgical procedures and was magnified by the presence of a prosthetic-mesh footprint in the abdominal wall.

Incisional hernia repair with a slowly absorbable P4HB mesh: what happens after the mesh disappears? A retrospective longitudinal clinical study

PURPOSE

To analyze the incisional hernia recurrence rate at a long-term follow-up using a biosynthetic long-term absorbable mesh in patients with a higher risk of surgical infection in a contaminated surgical field.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicentric study. All patients undergoing incisional hernia repair between 2016 and 2018 at 6 participating university centers were included. Patients were classified according to the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG). All consecutive patients who underwent abdominal wall repair using biosynthetic long-term absorbable mesh (Phasix^®) in contaminated fields (grade 3 and 4 of the VHWG classification) were included. Patients were followed-up until September 2021. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were collected. All patients' surgical site infections (SSIs) and surgical site occurrences (SSOs) were recorded. The primary outcome of interest was the clinical incisional hernia recurrence rate.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were included: 77 with VHWG grade 3 (71.3%) and 31 with VHWG grade 4 (28.7%). Median time follow-up was 41 months [24; 63]. Twenty-four patients had clinical recurrence during the follow-up (22.2%). The SSI and SSO rates were 24.1% and 36.1%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, risk factors for incisional hernia recurrence were previous recurrence, mesh location, and postoperative enterocutaneous fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

At the 3 year follow-up, the recurrence rate with a biosynthetic absorbable mesh (Phasix^®) for incisional hernia repair in high-risk patients (VHWG grade 3 and 4) seemed to be suitable (22.2%). Most complications occurred in the first year, and SSI and SSO rates were low despite high-risk VHWG grading.

Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Resorbable Synthetic Onlay and Biologic Intraperitoneal Mesh for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A 2-Year Match-Paired Analysis

BACKGROUND

Abdominal wall reconstruction persists as a challenging surgical issue with a multitude of management strategies available. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of resorbable synthetic mesh onlay plane against biologic mesh in the intraperitoneal plane.

METHODS

A single-center, two-surgeon, 5-year retrospective review (2014 to 2019) was performed examining subjects who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction in the onlay plane with resorbable synthetic mesh or in the intraperitoneal plane with biologic mesh. A matched paired analysis was conducted. Data examining demographic characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative outcomes, and costs were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight subjects (44 per group) were identified (median follow-up, 24.5 months). The mean age was 57.7 years, with a mean body mass index of 30.4 kg/m2. The average defect size was 292 ± 237 cm2, with most wounds being clean-contaminated (48.9 percent) and 55 percent having failed prior repair. Resorbable synthetic mesh onlay subjects were significantly less likely (4.5 percent) to experience recurrence compared to biologic intraperitoneal mesh subjects (22.7 percent; p < 0.026). In addition, mesh onlay suffered fewer postoperative surgical-site occurrences (18.2 percent versus 40.9 percent; p < 0.019) and required fewer procedural interventions (11.4 percent versus 36.4 percent; p < 0.011), and was also associated with significantly lower total costs ($16,658 ± $14,930) compared to biologic intraperitoneal mesh ($27,645 ± $16,864; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal wall reconstruction remains an evolving field, with various techniques available for treatment. When faced with hernia repair, resorbable synthetic mesh in the onlay plane may be preferable to biologic mesh placed in the intraperitoneal plane because of lower long-term recurrence rates, surgical-site complications, and costs.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Comparison of extended totally extra peritoneal (eTEP) vs intra peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for management of primary and incisional hernia in terms of early outcomes and cost effectiveness-a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There are no randomized controlled trials comparing the eTEP with IPOM repair and this randomized study was designed to compare the two techniques in terms of early pain, cost effectiveness, and quality of life.

METHOD

This was a prospective randomized trial with intention to treat analysis. The primary outcome was immediate post-operative pain scores. Operative time, conversions, peri operative morbidity, hospital stay, return to daily activities, incremental cost effectiveness ratio and quality of life (WHO-QOL BREF) were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomized equally. Early post-operative pain scores and seroma rates were significantly lower and with a significantly earlier return to activity in eTEP group (p value < 0.05). With negative costs and positive effects, eTEP group was 2.4 times more cost effective.

CONCLUSION

eTEP repair is better in terms of lesser early post-operative pain, earlier return to activities and cost effectiveness in small and medium size defects.

Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach is becoming increasingly more widely accepted as a promising technique in the treatment of ventral hernia. However, evidence is still lacking regarding the perioperative, postoperative and long-term outcomes of this technique. The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the current available evidence regarding the perioperative and short-term outcomes of ventral hernia repair using eTEP.

Study design

A systematic search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science electronic databases to identify studies on the laparoscopic or robotic-enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach for the treatment of ventral hernia. A pooled meta-analysis was performed. The primary end point was focused on short-term outcomes regarding perioperative characteristics and postoperative parameters.

Results

A total of 13 studies were identified involving 918 patients. Minimally invasive eTEP resulted in a rate of surgical site infection of 0% [95% CI 0.0–1.0%], a rate of seroma of 5% [95% CI 2.0–8.0%] and a rate of major complications (Clavien–Dindo III–IV) of 1% [95% CI 0.0–3.0%]. The rate of intraoperative complications was 2% [95% CI 0.0–4.0%] with a conversion rate of 1.0% [95% CI 0.0–3.0%]. Mean hospital length of stay was 1.77 days [95% CI 1.21–2.24]. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months (1–24), the rate of recurrence was 1% [95% CI 0.0–1.0%].

Conclusion

Minimally invasive eTEP is a safe and effective approach for ventral hernia repair, with low reported intraoperative complications and good outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10029-021-02557-8.

Totally endoscopic sublay/extraperitoneal Sugarbaker mesh repair for parastomal hernia

INTRODUCTION

Shared consensus is that a nonslit-mesh-based laparoscopic repair technique is the optimal treatment principle for parastomal hernia (PSH).

MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

An 81-year-old female parastomal hernia patient who had a previous history of laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection presented for surgical treatment. We performed a novel totally endoscopic sublay/extraperitoneal Sugarbaker mesh repair (TES-Sugarbaker) for this disease. The mesh was deployed in the sublay/extraperitoneal plane in a Sugarbaker configuration.

DISCUSSION

TES-Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia is technically feasible, it requires no anti-adhesive coated mesh and less traumatic fixation, then reduces the mesh-related complication and postoperative pain, making it more cost effective. The present described case represents an early attempt to perform endoscopic sublay/extraperitoneal mesh repair for PSH.

Nationwide increase in component separation without concomitant rise in readmissions: A nationwide readmissions database analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of component separation technique (CST) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) increases the rate of primary musculofascial closure but can be associated with increased wound complications, which may require readmission. This study examines 3-year trends in readmissions for patients undergoing AWR with or without CST.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients undergoing elective AWR from 2016-2018. CST, demographic characteristics, and 90-day complications and readmissions were determined. CST versus non-CST readmissions were compared, including matched subgroups. Standard statistics and logistic regression were used.

RESULTS

Over the 3-year period, 94,784 patients underwent AWR. There was an annual increase in the prevalence of CST: 4.0% in 2016; 6.1% in 2017; 6.7% in 2018 (P < .01), which is a 67.5% upsurge during that time. Most cases (82.3%) occurred at urban teaching hospitals, which had more comorbid patients (P < .01). The yearly 90-day readmission rate did not change: 16.0%, 18.2%, and 16.9% (P = .26). Readmissions were higher for CST patients than non-CST patients (17.1% vs 15.7%), but not in the matched subgroup (17.0% vs 16.4%; P = .41). Most commonly, readmissions were for infection (28.3%); 14.3% of readmitted patients underwent reoperation. Smoking, morbid obesity, diabetes, chronic lung disease, urban-teaching hospital status, and increased length of stay increased the chance of readmission (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

From 2016 to 2018, the use of CST increased 67.5% nationwide without an increase in readmissions. As we look toward clinical targets to reduce risk of readmission, modifiable health conditions, such as smoking, morbid obesity, and diabetes should be targeted during the prehabilitation process.

Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) in large and other complex ventral hernias: a single-surgeon experience

PURPOSE

Over the last years, great advances in the repair of abdominal wall hernias have dramatically improved patients' outcomes. Especially for large and other complex ventral hernias, the application of component separation techniques has been a landmark in their successful management. The aim of this study is to present our experience with the posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release (TAR) in patients with these demanding ventral hernias.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all patients who underwent elective ventral hernia repair with TAR between January 2016 and December 2019 was performed. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients with large and other complex ventral hernias were included in the final analysis. More than 80% of patients had one or more comorbidities. Of all patients, 116 (92.8%) had a history of previous abdominal surgery, 27 (21.6%) had a history of SSI and nine (7.2%) had active fistulas. Postoperatively, SSOs were presented in 11 patients (8.8%), including three cases of SSI. Neither mesh infection occurred, nor mesh excision required. With a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, only one recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

With a wound complication rate of less than 9% and a recurrence rate of less than 1%, our results show that TAR is a reliable, safe and effective technique for the repair of massive and other complex ventral hernias. The combination of knowledge of the abdominal wall anatomy at a proficient level, proper training, and adoption of a strict prehabilitation program are considered prerequisites for the successful management of such demanding hernias.

Strategies for Mesh Fixation in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Concepts and Techniques

SUMMARY

Ventral hernias have numerous causes, ranging from sequelae of surgical procedures to congenital deformities. Patients suffering from these hernias experience a reduced quality of life through pain, associated complications, and physical disfigurement. Therefore, it is important to provide these patients with a steadfast repair that restores functionality and native anatomy. To do this, techniques and materials for abdominal wall reconstruction have advanced throughout the decades, leading to durable surgical repairs. At the cornerstone of this lies the use of mesh. When providing abdominal wall reconstruction, a surgeon must make many decisions with regard to mesh use. Along with the type of mesh and plane of placement of mesh, a surgeon must decide on the method of mesh fixation. Fixation of mesh provides an equal distribution of tension and a more robust tissue-mesh interface, which promotes integration. There exist numerous modalities for mesh fixation, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. This Special Topic article aims to compare and contrast methods of mesh fixation in terms of strength of fixation, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. Methods included in this review are suture, tack, fibrin glue, mesh strip, and self-adhering modes of fixation.

[Current robotic ventral hernia surgery exemplified by 50 consecutive patients]

BACKGROUND

In recent years there has been a rise in robotic techniques and approaches regarding hernia repair with extraperitoneal mesh placement.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the first 50 patients who underwent robotic ventral hernia repair between May 2019 and November 2020 at the department of general surgery of the Kempten Clinic was performed.

RESULTS

This case series consisted of 36 incisional hernias, 12 primary hernias (8 umbilical and 3 epigastric hernias in combination with a diastasis recti abdominis as well as 1 Spigelian hernia) and 2 parastomal hernias. A complete closure of the hernia was achieved in all cases. Extraperitoneal mesh placement in the retromuscular or preperitoneal space was achieved in 98 % of the ventral procedures. We used an extraperitoneal approach with retromuscular mesh implantation (r-eTEP= robotic enhanced view total extraperitoneal plasty) in 22 cases, 3 of those along with a transversus abdominis release (r-eTAR= robotic extraperitoneal transversus abdominis release) and 26 operations were carried out transperitoneally. These included 11 preperitoneal (r-vTAPP= robotic ventral TAPP), 7 retrorectus (TARUP= robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic hernia repair) and 1 intraperitoneal onlay mesh placements (r-IPOM= robotic intraperitoneal onlay mesh) as well as 7 transperitoneal transversus abdominis releases with retromuscular mesh placement. The 2 parastomal hernias were treated with an intraperitoneal 3D funnel mesh. After the initial treatment of smaller hernias the indications could be rapidly extended to complex hernias in 38 % of this case series. One conversion to an open operation was necessary due to technical problems in closing the posterior rectus sheath. The complication rate was 12 % and the reintervention rate 4 %.

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery of ventral hernia is safe and effective. Even complex hernias can be treated minimally invasively with closure of the hernia defect and extraperitoneal mesh placement.

Early Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a New Hybrid Mesh for Incisional Hernia Repair

INTRODUCTION

Consensus on the safety and efficacy of various types of mesh in reconstructing the abdomen has yet to be reached. Hybrid mesh products have been designed to address the need for a cost-effective mesh leveraging the tensile strength of a synthetic mesh while minimizing the prosthetic footprint within the abdominal wall through resorbable materials. In this study we evaluate early clinical outcomes and health related quality of life (HR-QOL) of a new Hybrid mesh, Synecor^TM, for Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR).

METHODS

Adult (>18 y old) patients undergoing VHR with Synecor^TM mesh by a single surgeon between 2017-2019 with ≥1-y follow-up were identified. We analyzed a composite of postoperative outcomes as well as the incidence of hernia recurrence, readmissions, mortality, and HR-QOL.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were included in our analysis with a median follow up of 2.1 y. The median age and BMI were 54.1 y and 33.2 kg/m², respectively. The rate of surgical site occurrences was 37.1%, with only one patient (2.9%) requiring surgical intervention. No patients developed a hernia recurrence. Overall HR-QOL improved significantly (preoperative mean 2.5 [SD 0.7] versus postoperative 3.4 [0.4]; P< 0.01), particularly in regards to pain, functional status, self-esteem and body image (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal reinforcement with Synecor^TM mesh at the time of VHR results in promising early recurrence rates, an acceptable safety risk profile, and an improvement in overall HR-QOL.

Onlay Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) Mesh for Complex Hernia: Early Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

While mesh re-enforcement and advanced surgical techniques are cornerstones of complex ventral hernia repair (CVHR), the risk of complications and recurrence is common. We aim to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) of patients undergoing CVHR with onlay Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB).

METHODS

Adult (>18 y old) patients undergoing VHR with P4HB (Phasix) in the onlay plane by a single surgeon from 01/2015 to 05/2020 were reviewed. VHR was considered complex if patients had significant co-morbidities, large abdominal wall defects, a history of extensive abdominal surgery, and/or concurrent intra-abdominal pathology. A composite of postoperative outcomes including surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOpi), as well as PROs as defined by the Abdominal Hernia-Q (AHQ), were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients were included with average age and body mass index of 56.4 and 29.9 kg/m². Median follow up was 20 mo with a hernia recurrence rate of 5.9% (n = 3). 21 patients had an SSO (41.2%), 8 had an SSI (15.7%), and 6 had an SSOpi (11.8%). There was an association with Ventral Hernia Working Group ≥ 2 and development of SSO. There was a significant improvement in overall PROs (P < 0.0001) with no difference in those patients with and without complications (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

For hernia patients with large defects and complex intra-abdominal pathology, a safe and effective repair is difficult. The use of onlay P4HB was associated with acceptable postoperative outcomes and recurrence rate.

Enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach for the treatment of abdominal wall hernias: mid-term results

INTRODUCTION

Multiple minimally invasive techniques have been described for ventral hernia repair. The recently described enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia repair seems an appealing option since it allows to address midline and lateral hernias, placing the mesh in the retromuscular position without the use of traumatic fixation.

AIM

To report on the mid-term result of a series of patients with ventral hernias repaired by the eTEP approach.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of our case series between June 2017 and December 2019. Demographic and clinical data were gathered. Hernia characteristics, surgical details, hernia recurrences, and complications are reported.

RESULTS

66 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 22 months (interquartile range 12-26). 60% of patients were male. Mean age, BMI, % of Type-2 diabetes and % of smoking were 59 ± 12 years, 30 kg/m², 24% and 23%, respectively. Mean hernia defect size was 5.5 ± 2.9 cm. Forty-three eTEP Rives-stoppa and 23 eTEP-Transversus abdominis release (14 unilateral, 9 bilateral) were performed. 22 inguinal hernias and 15 lateral defects were simultaneously repaired. We report 1 recurrence (1.5%) and 10 surgical site occurrences (15%; 6 seromas, 2 hematomas and 2 surgical site infections). Four patients required reinterventions (6%).

CONCLUSION

eTEP is a promising approach to treat midline hernias and allows the simultaneous treatment of lateral and inguinal defects, keeping the mesh in the retromuscular position. However, comparative studies must be performed to know its real benefit in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up

BACKGROUND

This study represents a prospective, multicenter, open-label study to assess the safety, performance, and outcomes of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB, Phasix™) mesh for primary ventral, primary incisional, or multiply-recurrent hernia in subjects at risk for complications. This study reports 3-year clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

P4HB mesh was implanted in 121 patients via retrorectus or onlay technique. Physical exam and/or quality of life surveys were completed at 1, 3, 6,12, 18, 24, and 36 months, with 5-year (60-month) follow-up ongoing.

RESULTS

A total of n = 121 patients were implanted with P4HB mesh (n = 75 (62%) female) with a mean age of 54.7 ± 12.0 years and mean BMI of 32.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2 (±standard deviation). Comorbidities included: obesity (78.5%), active smokers (23.1%), COPD (28.1%), diabetes mellitus (33.1%), immunosuppression (8.3%), coronary artery disease (21.5%), chronic corticosteroid use (5.0%), hypo-albuminemia (2.5%), advanced age (5.0%), and renal insufficiency (0.8%). Hernias were repaired via retrorectus (n = 45, 37.2% with myofascial release (MR) or n = 43, 35.5% without MR), onlay (n = 8, 6.6% with MR or n = 24, 19.8% without MR), or not reported (n = 1, 0.8%). 82 patients (67.8%) completed 36-month follow-up. 17 patients (17.9% ± 0.4%) experienced hernia recurrence at 3 years, with n = 9 in the retrorectus group and n = 8 in the onlay group. SSI (n = 11) occurred in 9.3% ± 0.03% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes following ventral hernia repair with P4HB mesh demonstrate low recurrence rates at 3-year (36-month) postoperative time frame with no patients developing late mesh complications or requiring mesh removal. 5-year (60-month) follow-up is ongoing.

A preliminary multicenter evaluation of endoscopic sublay repair for ventral hernia from China

Background

For ventral hernia, endoscopic sublay repair (ESR) may overcome the disadvantages of open sublay and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. This retrospective study presents the preliminary multicenter results of ESR from China. The feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ESR were evaluated; its surgical points and indications were summarized.

Methods

The study reviewed 156 ventral hernia patients planned to perform with ESR in ten hospitals between March 2016 and July 2019. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, operative variables, and surgical results were recorded and analyzed.

Results

ESR was performed successfully in 153 patients, 135 with totally extraperitoneal sublay (TES) and 18 with transabdominal sublay (TAS). In 19 patients, TES was performed with the total visceral sac separation (TVS) technique, in which the space separation is carried out along the peritoneum, avoiding damage to the aponeurotic structure. Endoscopic transversus abdominis release (eTAR) was required in 17.0% of patients, and only 18.3% of patients required permanent mesh fixation. The median operative time was 135 min. Most patients had mild pain and resume eating soon after operation. No severe intraoperative complications occurred. Bleeding in the extraperitoneal space occurred in two patients and was stopped by nonsurgical treatment. Seroma and chronic pain were observed in 5.23 and 3.07% of patients. One recurrence occurred after TAS repair for an umbilical hernia.

Conclusion

ESR is feasible, safe, and effective for treating ventral hernias when surgeons get the relevant surgical skills, such as the technique of “partition breaking,” TVS, and eTAR. Small-to-medium ventral hernias are the major indications.

The impact of sarcopenia on oncologic abdominal wall reconstruction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sarcopenia is an objective measure of patient frailty and is a predictor of adverse surgical outcomes. We hypothesized that sarcopenia is associated with increased surgical site occurrence (SSO) and hernia occurrences in patients undergoing oncologic abdominal wall reconstruction.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) for an abdominal wall ablative defect at a single center from 2005 to 2015 were evaluated. The total psoas index (TPI) was used to define sarcopenia. The primary endpoint of the study was hernia occurrence; (SSO) was a secondary outcome measure.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that sarcopenia increased the risk of hernia more than threefold, trending toward significance (OR = 3.3; 95% CI: 0.69-15.4; P = .13). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that preoperative radiotherapy (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 1.4-16; P = .01) and obesity (OR = 4.9, 95% CI: 1.5-16.3; P =.009) were independent predictors of developing an SSO.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia, as defined by TPI, is correlated with hernia occurrence, but not SSO. These findings emphasize the importance of preoperative fitness and nutritional optimization and provide useful information for preoperative counseling and risk stratification.

Polypropylene Mesh Complications in the Sublay Position After Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Les complications des treillis de polypropylène en sous-couche après une reconstruction mammaire par voie abdominale

Introduction

Abdominal wall morbidity after microsurgical breast reconstruction is an important consideration for patients and surgeons. Previous studies are limited by multiple mesh locations or types. In this study, we evaluate specifically subfascial polypropylene mesh placement to determine a more definitive complication rate and basis for objective comparison.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction at our institution by 3 surgeons from 2015 to 2018. All patients with sublay placement of polypropylene mesh were included. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, type of reconstruction, and postoperative abdominal wall complications were recorded.

Results

A total of 114 flaps were performed on 81 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 48 were deep inferior epigastric artery (DIEP) flaps (42%), 43 were MS-2 TRAM flaps (37.8%), 20 were muscle sparing (MS-1) transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) flaps (17.5%), and 3 were free TRAM flaps (2.6%). Average follow-up was 392 days (range: 29-1191). Average body mass index was 30.7. No patients developed hernias. Two patients (2.5%) complained of post-operative bulges, neither of which required operative treatment. Two patients experienced superficial abdominal wall infection, one of which required admission and intravenous antibiotics. Ten patients (12.3%) had abdominal incision dehiscence, 3 of which required operative intervention. There were no cases of mesh exposure, contamination, or removal.

Conclusion

Polypropylene mesh is safe and effective, with subfascial placement resulting in low morbidity and low rates of bulge/hernia formation after microsurgical breast reconstruction. Consideration should be given to using polypropylene mesh for fascial repairs after microsurgical breast reconstruction, particularly in high-risk populations.

Simultaneous Ventral Hernia Repair and Panniculectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous ventral hernia repair and panniculectomy (SVHRP) is a procedure that is more commonly being offered to patients with excess skin and subcutaneous tissue in need of a ventral hernia repair; however, there are concerns about surgical-site complications and uncertainty regarding the durability of repair. SVHRP outcomes vary within the literature. This study assessed the durability, complication profile, and safety of SVHRP through a large data-driven repository of SVHRP cases.360 METHODS:: The current SVHRP literature was queried using the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases. Predefined selection criteria resulted in 76 relevant titles yielding 16 articles for analysis. Meta-analysis was used to analyze primary outcomes, identified as surgical-site occurrence and hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included review of techniques used and systemic complications, which were analyzed with pooled weighted mean analysis from the collected data.

RESULTS

There were 917 patients who underwent an SVHRP (mean age, 52.2 ± 7.0 years; mean body mass index, 36.1 ± 5.8 kg/m; mean pannus weight, 3.2 kg). The mean surgical-site occurrence rate was 27.9 percent (95 percent CI, 15.6 to 40.2 percent; I = 70.9 percent) and the mean hernia recurrence rate was 4.9 percent (95 percent CI, 2.4 to 7.3 percent; I = 70.1 percent). Mean follow-up was 17.8 ± 7.7 months. The most common complications were superficial surgical-site infection (15.8 percent) and seroma formation (11.2 percent). Systemic complications were less common (7.8 percent), with a thromboembolic event rate of 1.2 percent. The overall mortality rate was 0.4 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

SVHRP is associated with a high rate of surgical-site occurrence, but surgical-site infection seems to be less prominent than previously anticipated. The low hernia recurrence rate and the safety of this procedure support its current implementation in abdominal wall reconstruction.

Transabdominal (TA) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

Retromuscular mesh placement positioning utilizing the robotic platform can be performed using either a transabdominal or an extraperitoneal approach. The aim of this study is to compare short-term outcomes of robotic transabdominal access retromuscular (rTA-RM) repair and robotic totally extraperitoneal access retromuscular (rTEP-RM) repair for ventral hernias METHODS: Patients who underwent robotic retromuscular repair between February 2013-October 2019 were included in the study. A one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to obtain two balanced groups. A comparative analysis was performed in terms of perioperative and early post-operative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients were included for PSM analysis. 82 patients were allocated into each study group. Operative times were longer in rTA-RM group. Adhesiolysis was more frequently required in the rTA-RM group. Intra-operative complications occurred more frequently in patients who underwent rTA-RM repair (p = 0.120; 4.9% in rTA-RM vs. 0% in rTEP-RM). The rate of major complications during the first 90 days did not differ between groups (p = 0.277; 7.3% vs. 2.4%, respectively). The proportion of patients with minor perioperative complications was statistically higher in the rTA-RM group than the rTEP-RM group (p = 0.003; 30.5% vs. 11%, respectively). Overall rate of surgical site events was higher in the rTA-RM group than the rTEP-RM group (p = 0.049; 17.1% vs. 6.1%, respectively). Seroma frequency was higher after rTA-RM repair (p = 0.047; 13.4% vs. 3.7%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that rTEP-RM repair was associated with shorter surgery duration and improved early post-operative outcomes in comparison with rTA-RM repair.