Survival and Disease Recurrence Rates among Breast Cancer Patients following Mastectomy with or without Breast Reconstruction

Is Immediate Breast Reconstruction an Option for Elderly Women? A Comparative Study Between Elderly and Younger Population

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications (POC) in elderly patients (EP) compared to younger patients (YP) following immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after total mastectomy (TM).

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients treated at the Institut Universitaire of Cancer of Toulouse-Oncopole (IUCT-O) between January 2014 and May 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of POC within 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the delay before initiation of adjuvant treatments and re-hospitalization rates.

RESULTS

Elderly patients had a significantly higher rate of POC compared to younger patients, affecting 27.9% of EP and only 14.8% of YP. However, the severity of complications does not differ significantly between YP and EP (69.1% of major POC for YP and 64.7% for EP, P = .6680). Rates of re-hospitalization within 30 days between the 2 groups are similar (67.3% for YP and 61.8% for EP, P = .5962). Most importantly, these complications are not responsible for a delay in initiating adjuvant treatment compared with the younger population. Age ≥ 70 years and obesity (BMI ≥ 30) were identified as independent risk factors for POC.

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher rate of POC, immediate breast reconstruction can be considered for elderly patients, but these patients should be carefully selected and assessed preoperatively to limit the risk of POC.

Breast Implants: Low Rate of Annual Check-Ups Results in Delayed Presentation of Ruptured Implants

Background: Breast-implant-based reconstruction is one of the most performed procedures in plastic surgery. Despite the high durability of breast implants, various complications are accompanied with prolonged inlay duration, particularly implant rupture. Many aftereffects can be associated with implant rupture, especially siliconoma and BIA-ALCL. Without regular implant check-ups, implant-related issues may remain underrecognized. Here, we analyzed the number of breast implant carriers needing revisions and if patients adhered to annual implant follow-up recommendations. Methods: We reviewed 1128 breast procedures at the department of plastic surgery at the University Clinic of St. Poelten between August 1st 2018 and December 31st 2023. Patients were analyzed to see whether regular check-ups of their breast implants were performed. Additionally, implant-related complications were investigated, as well as if they were noticed by implant carriers. Results: Only 15.46% of breasts implants were regularly checked at least once a year in our cohort. The remaining 84.54% of patients consulted our department due to pain or aesthetic discomfort without periodical follow-ups. Most implant ruptures (73.8%) were diagnosed in patients consulting acutely due to pain or capsular contraction after an average of 17.36 ± 10.57 years. Routine examination uncovered 26.2% of silent implant ruptures without patients yet complaining of clinical symptoms as early as 15.44 ± 11.17 years. Conclusions: Most implant ruptures develop clinical symptoms as an indicator that removal is warranted. However, only regular follow-ups can identify implant complications several years earlier and possibly reduce severe sequalae such as BIA-ALCL. This highlights the significance and necessity of annual breast implant controls by surgeons and radiologic imaging to prevent devastating implant-associated aftereffects.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complication Profiles of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications of distinct implant-based breast reconstruction modality for patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on breast cancer patients with stage II-III disease who performed implant-based breast reconstruction following with PMRT between September 2016 and April 2022. The patients were categorized into two matched groups: (1) patients receiving prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) or (2) subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR) followed by PMRT. Following reconstruction, the patients were further compared for PMRT with the tissue expander (PMRT-TE) versus PMRT with permanent implant (PMRT-PI). PROs were measured with BREAST-Q questionnaire. Early and late complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 55 eligible patients were recruited. Patients who underwent PBR reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts scores (P = 0.003) compared with the SBR group. The PMRT-TE group had higher satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) but lower physical well-being (P = 0.029) scores compared with PMRT-PI group. Moreover, patients in SBR cohort had a higher risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) (20.5% vs 6.3%) and implant dislocation (48.7% vs 12.5%) than patients in PBR cohort. Patients in PMRT-PI group had a slightly higher rate of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) than PMRT-TE group (20.8% vs 12.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

PBR was associated with lower rates of late complications, especially for implant dislocation, and higher satisfaction with breasts scores compared to SBR. In addition, compared to PMRT-TE with PMRT-PI, patients in PMRT-TE cohort reported superior PROs of satisfaction with breasts.

Oncologic Safety of One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Breast Cancer Patients With Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Single-Center Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the oncologic safety of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction (OIBR) following mastectomy in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs).

METHODS

We collected clinical and pathological data from breast cancer patients with positive SLNs who underwent OIBR or not after mastectomy between January 2015 and December 2018. A total of 194 patients were included, with 130 patients undergoing mastectomy alone (MA) and 64 patients receiving OIBR after mastectomy. The clinical and pathological features, as well as the postoperative oncologic outcomes, of the 2 groups were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to mitigate the effects of data bias and confounding factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 66 months for the OIBR group and 64 months for the MA group after PSM. The majority of reconstructive surgeries use an approach of prosthetic implantation (52.0%). This is followed by prosthetic implantation combined with a latissimus dorsi (LD) flap (32.0%), and acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted implant placement (16.0%). During the follow-up period, a local recurrence was observed in 1 case, regional recurrence in 3 cases, and distant metastasis leading to death in 3 cases among the OIBR group patients. No significant difference was found between the OIBR and MA groups in disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .66), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (P = .91), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) (P = .44), and overall survival (OS) (P = .57).

CONCLUSION

OIBR is a safe option for breast cancer patients with positive SLNs and does not negatively impact cancer recurrence or overall survival.

Survival analysis of recurrent breast cancer patients using mix Bayesian network

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women. Iranians have an 11% BC recurrence rate, which lowers their survival rates. Few studies have investigated cancer recurrence survival rates. This study's major purpose is to use a mixed Bayesian network (BN) to analyze recurrent patients' survival.

Material and methods

This study aimed to evaluate the pathobiological features, age, gender, final status, and survival time of the patients. Bayesian imputation was used for missing data. The performance of BN was optimized through the utilization of a blacklist and prior probability. After structural and parametric learning, posterior conditional probabilities and mean survival periods for the node arcs were predicted. The hold-out technique based on the posterior classification error was used to investigate the model's validation.

Results

The study included 220 cancer recurrence patients. These patients averaged 47 years old. The BN with a blacklist and prior probability has a higher network score than other networks. The hold-out technique verified structural learning. The Directed Acyclic Graph showed a statistically significant relationship between cancer biomarkers (ER, PR, and HER2 receptors), cancer stage, and tumor grade and patient survival duration. Patient death was also significantly associated with education, ER, PR, HER2, and tumor grade. The BN reports that HER2 negative, ER positive, and PR positive patients had a higher survival rate.

Conclusion

Survival and death of relapsed patients depend on biomarkers. Based on the findings, patient survival can be predicted with their features.

Does the Type of Reconstruction Matter? A Propensity Score Analysis of Immediate Postmastectomy Implant and Flap Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

No randomized controlled trials have compared implant and flap reconstruction. Recently, worse longitudinal outcomes have been suggested for flap reconstruction. The authors compared long-term oncologic outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction using propensity score matching.

METHODS

A retrospective study of postmastectomy reconstruction was achieved using the Weill Cornell Breast Cancer Registry between 1998 and 2019. Patients were matched using propensity scores based on demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics. Kaplan-Meier estimates, Cox-regression models, and restricted mean survival times (RMST) were used to evaluate patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Before matching, 1395 implant and 586 flap patients were analyzed. No difference in overall survival and recurrence were observed. Multivariable models showed decreased survival for Medicare/Medicaid [hazard ratio (HR), 3.09; 95% CI, 1.63 to 5.87; P < 0.001], pathologic stage II (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.12 to 7.90; P = 0.028), stage III (HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.54 to 15.5; P = 0.007), 11 to 20 lymph nodes positive (HR, 3.66; 95% CI, 1.31 to 10.2; P = 0.013), more than 20 lymph nodes positive (HR, 6.41; 95% CI, 1.49 to 27.6; P = 0.013). RMST at 10 years after flap reconstruction showed 2 months of decreased survival time compared with implants (9.56 versus 9.74 years; 95% CI, -0.339 to -0.024; P = 0.024). After matching, 563 implant and 563 flap patients were compared. Reconstruction was not associated with overall survival and recurrence. RMST between implant and flap reconstruction showed no difference in each 5-year interval over 20 years.

CONCLUSION

Postmastectomy breast reconstruction was not associated with a difference in long-term oncologic outcomes over a 20-year period.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery

This article provides an overview of the principles and techniques of oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Oncoplastic breast surgery (OPBS) with partial breast reconstruction is a natural evolution in the application of breast conserving surgery and permits wide surgical resection of tumours that might otherwise mandate mastectomy and whole breast reconstruction. These reconstructive techniques must be optimally selected and integrated with ablative breast surgery together with non-surgical treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy that may be variably sequenced with each other. A multidisciplinary approach with shared decision-making is essential to ensure optimal clinical and patient-reported outcomes that address oncological, aesthetic, functional and psychosocial domains. Future practice of OPBS must incorporate routine audit and comprehensive evaluation of outcomes.

Novel nomograms for predicting survival for immediate breast reconstruction patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer-a single-center 15-year experience

Background

Immediate breast reconstruction is widely accepted following oncologic mastectomy. This study aimed to build a novel nomogram predicting the survival outcome for Chinese patients undergoing immediate reconstruction following mastectomy for invasive breast cancer.

Methods

A retrospective review of all patients undergoing immediate reconstruction following treatment for invasive breast cancer was performed from May 2001 to March 2016. Eligible patients were assigned to a training set or a validation set. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to select associate variables. Two nomograms were developed based on the training cohort for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Internal and external validations were performed, and the C-index and calibration plots were generated to evaluate the performance (discrimination and accuracy) of the models.

Results

The 10-year estimated BCSS and DFS were 90.80% (95% CI: 87.30%-94.40%) and 78.40% (95% CI: 72.50%-84.70%), respectively, in the training cohort. In the validation cohort, they were and 85.60% (95% CI, 75.90%-96.50%) and 84.10% (95% CI, 77.80%-90.90%), respectively. Ten independent factors were used to build a nomogram for prediction of 1-, 5- and 10-year BCSS, while nine were used for DFS. The C-index was 0.841 for BCSS and 0.737 for DFS in internal validation, and the C-index was 0.782 for BCSS and 0.700 for DFS in external validation. The calibration curve for both BCSS and DFS demonstrated acceptable agreement between the predicted and actual observation in the training and the validation cohorts.

Conclusion

The nomograms provided valuable visualization of factors predicting BCSS and DFS in invasive breast cancer patients with immediate breast reconstruction. The nomograms may have tremendous potential in guiding individualized decision-making for physicians and patients in choosing the optimized treatment methods.

Do Socioeconomic Status and Race Impact the Safety and Efficacy of Breast Reconstruction?

INTRODUCTION

Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy has increased in recent years when compared with delayed reconstruction. Despite this encouraging trend, racial and socioeconomic disparities in the receipt of postmastectomy breast reconstruction have been well documented. We sought to assess the effect of race, socioeconomic status, and patient comorbidities on muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous outcomes at our safety net hospital institution in the southeast.

METHODS

The database of a tertiary referral center was queried for patients who received free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for immediate reconstruction after mastectomy meeting inclusion criteria from 2006 to 2020. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared based on socioeconomic status. The primary outcome (reconstructive success) was defined as breast reconstruction without flap loss. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance and χ2 tests were appropriate using Rstudio.

RESULTS

Three-hundred fourteen patients were included in the study, with 76% White, 16% Black, and 8% other. Overall complication rate at our institution was 17% and reconstructive success was 94%. Non-White race, older age at time of breast cancer diagnosis, higher body mass index, and presence of comorbid conditions including current smoking and hypertension were all associated with low socioeconomic status. Despite this, surgical complication rates were not predicted by non-White race, older age, or presence of diabetes mellitus. When analyzing major and minor complications based on radiation received or reconstructive success, there was no significant difference regardless of radiation treatment with the group overall achieving a 94% success rate (P = 0.229).

CONCLUSIONS

This study aimed to characterize the impact of socioeconomic status and race/ethnic status of patients on breast reconstruction outcomes at an institution in the South. We found that despite the greater morbidity in low income and ethnic/minority patients that when treated by a comprehensive safety net institution, they had excellent reconstructive outcomes due to low complications and minimal reoperations.

Estimating the incidence of breast cancer recurrence using administrative data

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, but most cancer registries do not capture recurrences. We estimated the incidence of local, regional, and distant recurrences using administrative data.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage I-III primary breast cancer in Ontario, Canada from 2013 to 2017 were included. Patients were followed until 31/Dec/2021, death, or a new primary cancer diagnosis. We used hospital administrative data (diagnostic and intervention codes) to identify local recurrence, regional recurrence, and distant metastasis after primary diagnosis. We used logistic regression to explore factors associated with developing a distant metastasis.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up 67 months, 5,431/45,857 (11.8%) of patients developed a distant metastasis a median 23 (9, 42) months after diagnosis of the primary tumor. 1086 (2.4%) and 1069 (2.3%) patients developed an isolated regional or a local recurrence, respectively. Patients with distant metastatic disease had a median overall survival of 15.4 months (95% CI 14.4-16.4 months) from the time recurrence/metastasis was identified. In contrast, the median survival for all other patients was not reached. Patients were more likely to develop a distant metastasis if they had more advanced stage, greater comorbidity, and presented with symptoms (p < 0.0001). Trastuzumab halved the risk of recurrence [OR 0.53 (0.45-0.63), p < 0.0001].

CONCLUSION

Distant metastasis is not a rare outcome for patients diagnosed with breast cancer, translating to an annual incidence of 2132 new cases (17.8% of all breast cancer diagnoses). Overall survival remains high for patients with locoregional recurrences, but was poor following a diagnosis of a distant metastasis.

Outcomes of smooth round implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Long-term follow-up results

The issue of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in 2019 has resulted in the discontinuation of textured breast implants and resumption in the use of smooth round implants. However, in the field of breast reconstruction, long-term follow-up data for direct-to-implant reconstruction using smooth round implants is insufficient. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of breast reconstruction using smooth round implants. This study included 185 patients (208 breasts) who underwent smooth round implant-based immediate breast reconstruction between 2007 and 2018. Their demographic information and surgical and oncological data were collected. Early (within 90 days) and late (after 90 days) complications, reoperations, implant maintenance, and the survival rate were analyzed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and identify the related factors. The mean follow-up period was 112.08 months. The most common early complications were skin necrosis (9.13%) and infection (3.85%). The factors influencing the development of early complications were the mastectomy specimen weight (237.14 ± 114.84 cc and 298.04 ± 141.53 cc for no complication and any complication, respectively; p = 0.0123) and implant volume (222.79 ± 77.76 cc and 264.48 ± 89.03 cc for no complication and any complication, respectively; p = 0.0082). The most common late complication was capsular contracture (13.46%). Approximately 91.35% of the implants were maintained during the follow-up period. The factors affecting the development of early complications and implant maintenance were the mastectomy specimen weight and implant volume. This study provides information on long-term follow-up results useful in cases where only smooth round implants are available, which can then serve as a basis for future related studies.

Analysis of Signs and Effects of Surgical Breast Cancer Patients Based on Big Data Technology

Big data in health care has gained popularity in recent years for disease prediction. Breast cancer infections are the most common cancer in urban Indian women, as well as women internationally, and are impacted by many events across countries and regions. Breast malignant growth is a notable disease among Indian women. According to the WHO, it represents 14% of all malignant growth tumors in women. A couple of studies have been directed utilizing big data to foresee breast malignant growth. Big data is causing a transformation in healthcare, with better and more ideal results. Monstrous volumes of patient-level data are created by using EHR (Electronic Health Record) systems data because of fast mechanical upgrades. Big data applications in the healthcare business will assist with improving results. Conventional forecast models, then again, are less productive in terms of accuracy and error rate because the exact pace of a specific calculation relies upon different factors such as execution structure, datasets (little or enormous), and kinds of datasets utilized (trait-based or picture based). This audit article looks at complex information mining, AI, and profound learning models utilized for recognizing breast malignant growth. Since "early identification is the way to avoidance in any malignant growth," the motivation behind this audit article is to support the choice of fitting breast disease expectation calculations, explicitly in the big information climate, to convey powerful and productive results. This survey article analyzes the precision paces of perplexing information mining, AI, and profound learning models utilized for distinguishing breast disease on the grounds that the exactness pace of a specific calculation relies upon different factors such as execution structure, datasets (little or enormous), and dataset types (quality based or picture based). The reason for this audit article is to aid the determination of suitable breast disease expectation calculations, explicitly in the big information climate, to convey successful and productive outcomes. Thus, "Early discovery is the way to counteraction in the event of any malignant growth."

A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Local and Distant Relapse of Breast Cancer Following Immediate Breast Reconstruction According to Molecular Subtypes

Purpose

Concerns have been raised about the oncologic safety of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy for breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate locoregional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) of breast cancer according to its molecular subtype in patients who underwent mastectomy alone or IBR after mastectomy.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive breast cancer patients treated by the single senior surgeon (XZ) between February 2010 and December 2014 were eligible. In total, 389 consecutive patients were included; 295 patients underwent mastectomy alone and 94 patients underwent mastectomy with IBR. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed for LRR and DM stratified by molecular subtypes.

Results

With a median follow-up of 73 and 87.5 months, 1.69% of patients in the mastectomy alone group developed LRR compared to 0% in the reconstruction group (p = 0.342) and the total incidence of DMs was 11.52% in patients who received mastectomy alone and 7.44% in patients who received postmastectomy IBR (p = 0.262), respectively. The cumulative incidence of LRR was 2.1% vs. 0% for luminal A, 0% vs. 0% for luminal B, 0% vs. 0% for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched, and 4.5% vs. 0% for triple-negative in the mastectomy alone group compared to the postmastectomy IBR group. The cumulative incidence of DM was 15.5% vs. 5.7% for luminal A, 10% vs. 8.7% for luminal B, 17.3% vs. 0% for HER2-enriched, and 6.8% vs. 7.1% for triple-negative in the mastectomy alone group compared to the postmastectomy IBR group. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, lymph node metastasis was associated with an increased risk of DM in the mastectomy alone group (p = 0.03) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an increased risk of DM in the postmastectomy IBR group (p = 0.021).

Conclusion

This study suggests that IBR does not have a negative impact on the LRR and DM of breast cancer according to molecular subtypes.

Development and validation of a rapid psychosocial well-being screening tool in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Breast Reconstruction Does Not Affect the Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer Located in the Central and Nipple Portion: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Analysis

Background

Tumors in the central and nipple portion (TCNP) are associated with poor prognosis and aggressive clinicopathological characteristics. The availability and safety of postmastectomy reconstruction in breast cancer patients with TCNP have still not been deeply explored. It is necessary to investigate whether reconstruction is appropriate for TCNP compared with non-reconstruction therapy in terms of survival outcomes.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we enrolled TCNP patients diagnosed between the years 2010 and 2016. The propensity score matching (PSM) technique was applied to construct a matched sample consisting of pairs of non-reconstruction and reconstruction groups. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were applied to estimate the factors associated with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

In the overall cohort, a total of 6,002 patients were enrolled. The patients in the reconstruction group showed significantly better BCSS (log-rank, p < 0.01) and OS (log-rank, p < 0.01) than those in the non-reconstruction group (832 patients) after PSM. However, the multivariate Cox regression model revealed that breast reconstruction was not associated with worse BCSS and OS of TCNP patients.

Conclusion

Our study provided a new perspective showing that breast reconstruction did not affect the survival and disease prognosis in the cohort of TCNP patients from SEER databases, compared with non-reconstruction. This finding provides further survival evidence supporting the practice of postmastectomy reconstruction for suitable TCNP patients, especially those with a strong willingness for breast reconstruction.

Is There a Difference in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Local Recurrence between Autologous Tissue and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction?

Introduction

Breast reconstruction has become common after total mastectomy; however, certain types of breast reconstruction may be associated with delayed local recurrence or poor survival. Here, we investigated whether there are differences in the diagnosis and prognosis of local recurrence between autologous reconstruction and implant reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing breast cancer surgery with autologous tissue or immediate implant reconstruction in a single center (January 2003-December 2017). Patient data including the period from cancer surgery to local recurrence diagnosis, tumor size at the time of recurrence, and survival time after cancer surgery and recurrence detection were analyzed.

Results

There was a significant difference (p = 0.021) in the time from surgery to recurrence between the autologous tissue (1,246 days) and implant (909 days) groups. Recurrence tumor size did not differ (autologous: 1.00 cm² vs. implant: 0.90 cm²; p = 0.813). Survival time after surgery (p = 0.63) and recurrence detection (p = 0.74) did not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Statistical difference in the detection time was observed between autologous tissue and implant group. On the other hand, there is no difference in recurrence tumor size or survival time. A further study is necessary to identify the different detection time of local recurrence.

The Role of Preoperative Breast Reconstruction Information in Selection of Immediate Reconstruction After Modified Radical Mastectomy-A Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

Immediate breast reconstruction has become an important supplement after modified radical mastectomy. The role of preoperative breast reconstruction information has not been widely popularized in China. It may play an important role in choosing immediate breast reconstruction. In this paper, we investigated whether there was an effect of the role of preoperative breast reconstruction information on the difference about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent.

METHODS

From 2015 January to March 2018, newly admitted 100 patients with breast carcinoma must receive modified radical mastectomy. All these patients' conditions met the requirements of immediate breast reconstruction. Patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics were recorded. They were randomly classified into two groups (A & B). Preoperative breast reconstruction information was designed and prepared. When it came to signing operation consent, Group A received preoperative breast reconstruction information and Group B did not receive it. We recorded whether they were willing to receive immediate breast reconstruction in different groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in patient age, breast reconstruction cognition, marital status, education, and family economics (P > 0.05). Thirty-two patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 18 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group A when 24 patients agreed to receive breast reconstruction and 26 patients did not agree to receive breast reconstruction in Group B. There was a statistical significance (P < 0.05) between the above two groups.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative breast reconstruction information may be a vital role for explaining about choosing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy at signing the operation consent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Outcomes after mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer in a multiethnic, middle-income Asian setting

BACKGROUND

Although immediate breast reconstruction is increasingly becoming popular worldwide, evidence from resource-limited settings is scarce. We investigated factors associated with immediate breast reconstruction in a multiethnic, middle-income Asian setting. Short-term surgical complications, timing of initiation of chemotherapy, and survival outcomes were compared between women undergoing mastectomy alone and their counterparts receiving immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

This historical cohort study included women who underwent mastectomy after diagnosis with stage 0 to stage IIIa breast cancer from 2011 to 2015 in a tertiary hospital. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with immediate breast reconstruction and to measure clinical outcomes.

RESULT

Out of 790 patients with early breast cancer who had undergone mastectomy, only 68 (8.6%) received immediate breast reconstruction. Immediate breast reconstruction was independently associated with younger age at diagnosis, recent calendar years, Chinese ethnicity, higher education level, and invasive ductal carcinomas. Although immediate breast reconstruction was associated with a higher risk of short-term local surgical complications (adjusted odds ratio: 3.58 [95% confidence interval 1.75-7.30]), there were no significant differences in terms of delay in initiation of chemotherapy, 5-year disease-free survival, and 5-year overall survival between both groups in the multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSION

Although associated with short-term surgical complications, immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy does not appear to be associated with delays in initiation of chemotherapy, recurrence, or mortality after breast cancer. These findings are valuable in facilitating shared surgical decision-making, improving access to immediate breast reconstruction, and setting priorities for surgical trainings in middle-income settings.

Immediate breast reconstruction is oncologically safe for node-positive patients: Comparison using propensity score matching

The oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in lymph node-positive patients is unclear. In the present study, the impact of IBR on recurrence based on data of patients with axillary lymph node metastases only was examined.The subjects were 232 patients who underwent breast surgery. The patients were grouped into 2 cohorts: non-IBR patients who underwent mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection; and IBR patients with tissue expander or flap transfer and axillary lymph node dissection. The Non-IBR group included 165 patients, and the IBR group included 67 patients. For the comparison of oncological outcomes between the 2 groups, propensity score matching was performed. The propensity scores were calculated by logistic regression analysis, including age, tumor staging, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, and estrogen receptor status. There was no difference in locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) between the non-IBR and IBR groups. The 5-year LRRFS rate was 78.9% in the non-IBR group and 85.1% in the IBR group. There was no difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the non-IBR and IBR groups. The 5-year RFS rate was 75.6% in the non-IBR group and 78.8% in the IBR group. In all patients, the 5-year LRRFS rate was 77.3%, and the RFS rate was 70.5%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify factors affecting RFS in all patients showed that estrogen receptor status and high nuclear grade were significant prognostic factors; IBR was irrelevant.This is the first report of an analysis using propensity score matching limited to node-positive breast cancer patients, and it showed that IBR is relatively safe in such patients.

Ethnic Disparities in Thrombotic and Bleeding Diatheses Revisited: A Systematic Review of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction across the East and West

BACKGROUND

 Ethnicity has been shown to play a role in disparate coagulative responses between East Asian and Caucasian patients undergoing nonmicrovascular surgery. In this study, we sought to further investigate this hematologic phenomenon between the two ethnic groups within the field of microsurgical breast reconstruction.

METHODS

 A systematic review examining the reported incidence of microvascular thrombosis and all-site bleeding among breast free flaps in East Asians and Westerners was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

 Ten East Asian studies with 581 flaps and 99 Western studies with 30,767 flaps were included. A statistically significant higher rate of thrombotic complications was found in Westerners compared with East Asians (4.2 vs. 2.2%, p = 0.02). Conversely, bleeding events were more common in East Asians compared with Westerners (2.6 vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

 There appears to be an ethnicity-based propensity for thrombosis in Westerners and, conversely, for bleeding in East Asians, as evident by the current systematic review of microvascular breast reconstruction data. It is therefore advisable to consider ethnicity in the comprehensive evaluation of patients undergoing microsurgical procedures.

Young Women With Breast Cancer: Treatment, Care, and Nursing Implications

BACKGROUND

Young women with breast cancer (YWBC) are more likely to have aggressive disease, carry mutations for hereditary cancer genes, and experience higher mortality. They also may face reduced fertility because of the toxicity of chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES

This article aims to present a review of YWBC treatments, sequelae of treatment, and psychosocial challenges.

METHODS

The authors performed a review of guideline-supported treatment options, patient resources, and nursing implications.

FINDINGS

Because of high-risk cancers and a lack of specific treatment guidelines, healthcare providers may consider aggressive treatments for younger patients. However, studies indicate that the foundation for treatment decisions for YWBC are best based on disease stage and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

A propensity score-matched comparison of recurrence outcomes after immediate implant vs autologous flap reconstruction in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

PURPOSE

We compared oncologic outcomes between breast cancer patients who underwent immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) and those who underwent autologous flap reconstruction (AFR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).

METHODS

The study group comprised 536 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent NACT followed by immediate IBBR or AFR. After propensity score matching, 138 patients in the IBBR group and 276 patients in the AFR group were selected for comparisons of locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS).

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the matched groups in locoregional recurrence rates (IBBR vs. AFR: 12.3% vs. 12%; P = 0.915) and distant metastasis (13% vs. 17%; P = 0.293). There was also no significant difference between the groups in LRRFS (P = 0.956), DFS (P = 0.606), DMFS (P = 0.283), or BCSS (P = 0.121). The 5- and 10-year LRRFS rates were 87.6% and 85.9% in the IBBR group, and 87.7% and 86.1% in the AFR group; the 5- and 10-year DFS rates were 79% and 77.5% in the IBBR group, and 77% and 75% in the AFR group; the 5- and 10-year DMFS rates were 85.9% and 85.9% in the IBBR group, and 83.2% and 81.8% in the AFR group; and the 5- and 10-year BCSS rates were 97.8% and 91.3% in the IBBR group, and 91.8% and 86% in the AFR group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this propensity score-matched analysis of oncologic outcomes in breast cancer patients who underwent immediate reconstruction after NACT, no significant differences were observed between the IBBR and AFR groups.

Higher Risk of Depression After Total Mastectomy Versus Breast Reconstruction Among Adult Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaregression

This systematic review with a meta-regression was conducted to determine the risk of depression after mastectomy compared to breast reconstruction among women with breast cancer 1 year after surgery. A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using 4 databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library for the period January 2000 to March 2019. Studies that measured the status of depression within 1 year and immediately after surgery were included. Outcomes related to depression were analyzed by using a pool of event rates and a risk ratio of 95% confidence interval (CI), P value, and a fitting model based on the results of a heterogeneity test of mastectomy and BR. The statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 software. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 865 cases of mastectomy only, with a 22.2% risk of depression (95% CI, 12.4-36.2). In 869 women who underwent BR, the risk of depression was 15.7% (95% CI, 8.8-26.2). The depression risk ratio for mastectomy compared to BR was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.11-1.65). Patients with delayed reconstruction exhibited lower levels of depression (risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.57-1.01). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale showed high sensitivity, and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) with a cutoff of > 7 could measure even low to moderate depressive symptoms. One in 4 women with breast cancer had symptoms of depression after mastectomy; both surgeries were associated with depression in women 1 year after surgery. Our results will permit the development of proactive treatment plans before and after surgery to mitigate risk and prevent depression through the use of sensitive depression scales like BDI.

Effects of Surgery on Prognosis of Young Women With Operable Breast Cancer in Different Marital Statuses: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The influence of surgical approaches [including mastectomy, breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and post-mastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) on prognosis of young women (<40 years old) with operable breast cancer has not been determined yet, and this might vary in patients with different marital statuses. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of surgery on survival outcomes for young women with operable breast cancer in different marital statuses.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify young women with operable breast cancer between 2004 and 2016, who underwent mastectomy, BCT or PMBR. We assessed overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratios using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

Compared to mastectomy, both of BCT and PMBR conferred better OS (BCT: HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.90, p <0.001; PMBR: HR = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.63-0.78, p <0.001) and BCSS (BCT: HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001; PMBR: HR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.65-0.81, p <0.001), but there was no significant difference of survival between BCT and PMBR group. The survival benefit of BCT compared to mastectomy remained significant in unmarried young women (OS: HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.55-0.83, p <0.001; BCSS: HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.56-0.86, p = 0.001) but not in the married (OS: HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.75-1.05, p = 0.177; BCSS: HR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.75-1.05, p = 0.161), while no matter married or not, PMBR group had better OS and BCSS than mastectomy group but not BCT group.

CONCLUSION

Both of BCT and PMBR had improved survival compared to mastectomy for young women with operable breast cancer. The survival benefit of BCT compared to mastectomy remained significant in unmarried patients but not in married patients.

Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Canadian Surgical Oncology Survey

Background

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) awareness has increased, resulting in concerns regarding the safety of implant-based reconstruction. Breast cancer patients are first seen by surgical oncologists, who are therefore potentially the first health-care professionals to encounter concerns regarding BIA-ALCL. We therefore surveyed surgical oncologists on their understanding of BIA-ALCL to better assess potential effects on plastic surgery practice.

Methods

An anonymous web-based survey consisting of 9 multiple-choice questions was sent to breast surgical oncologists that are members of the Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology (n = 135).

Results

Forty-two members responded (n = 42/135, 31%) and all participants were aware of BIA-ALCL. All participants reported that BIA-ALCL has not deterred them from referring patients for implant-based reconstruction. Twenty-two respondents (52%) discuss BIA-ALCL with their patients and 21% (n = 9) believe that BIA-ALCL typically follows a metastatic course. Eight respondents (19%) reported having a poor understanding of BIA-ALCL, while 14% (n = 6) were unable to identify the link to textured implants. There were no statistical differences based on case-load volume.

Conclusions

Approximately half of the respondent Canadian breast surgical oncologists discuss BIA-ALCL with their patients, yet there is a knowledge gap in terms of the epidemiology and clinical-pathological course of BIA-ALCL. It is of utmost importance to ensure that the plastic surgery community aims at including surgical oncologist colleagues in educational platforms regarding BIA-ALCL to ensure collaboration and unity in an effort to offer the most accurate information to patients, and prevent misinformation that may deter patients from seeking implant-based reconstruction.

Exploring the Effect of Post-mastectomy complications on 5-year survival

BACKGROUND

Ramifications of postoperative complications on long-term survival after mastectomy are uncertain.

METHODS

Overall complications (Clavien-Dindo Grades I-IIIB) and wound complications were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method for impact on 5-year overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 378 patients underwent mastectomy alone (157, 41%) or mastectomy with reconstruction (221, 59%) for Stage I-III disease with a median follow-up of 5 years. Postoperative complications occurred in 186 patients (49%), requiring non-surgical (I/II = 83, 22%) or surgical (IIIa/IIIb = 103, 27%) management. Wound complications occurred in 140 patients (37%). Reconstruction was associated with a higher rate of complication (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications after mastectomy (with or without reconstruction) did not significantly affect OS or DFS. Wound complications also showed no significant effect on OS or DFS following mastectomy alone, or mastectomy with reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative complications after mastectomy, with or without reconstruction, bear no significant impact on 5-year survival.

Determinants of receiving immediate breast reconstruction: An analysis of patient characteristics at a tertiary care center in the US

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction is an option for women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Previous studies have reported underutilization of reconstructive surgery. This study aims to examine the role demographic, clinical and socio-economic factors may have on patients' decisions to undergo breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We analyzed data from our institutional database. Using multivariable and multinomial logistic regression, we compared breast cancer patients who had undergone mastectomy-only to those who had immediate breast reconstruction (overall and by type of reconstruction).

RESULTS

We analyzed data on 1459 women who underwent mastectomy during the period 2003-2015. Of these, 475 (32.6%) underwent mastectomy-only and 984 (67.4%) also underwent immediate breast reconstruction. After adjusting for potential confounders, older age (OR = 0.18, 95%CI:0.08-0.40), Asian race (OR = 0.29, 95%CI:0.19-0.45), bilateral mastectomy (OR = 0.71, 95%CI:0.56-0.90), and higher stage of disease (OR = 0.44, 95%CI:0.26-0.74) were independent risk factors for not receiving immediate breast reconstruction. Furthermore, patients with Medicare or Medicaid insurance were less likely than patients with private insurance to receive an autologous reconstruction. There was no evidence for changes over time in the way socio-demographic and clinical factors were related to receiving immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical characteristics, sociodemographic factors like age, race and insurance coverage affect the decision for reconstructive surgery following mastectomy.

Breast Reconstruction for Medicaid Beneficiaries: A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence

Introduction: Medicaid beneficiaries are a generally disadvantaged population with access to elective specialty services. We sought to better understand utilization of breast reconstruction by Medicaid beneficiaries.Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for studies comparing breast reconstruction rates by insurance type. We extracted the information of interest to qualitatively and quantitatively synthesize the results of the studies.Results: We identified seven eligible studies. Overall, the rates of breast reconstruction have increased across insurance groups. However, our results show that Medicaid beneficiaries were on average less likely to receive breast reconstruction in comparison to patients with private insurance. Although, Medicaid patients again were more likely to receive breast reconstruction in comparison to Medicare beneficiaries.Conclusion: There is wide disparity in reconstruction rates by insurance status. However, with continued increase in the adult Medicaid population due to widening eligibility expansion, disparities involving this vulnerable population should be examined for causes and solutions.