18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Tumor Volume and Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas: Impact of Dual-Time Point and Segmentation Methods

Imaging-based characterization of tumoral heterogeneity for personalized cancer treatment

With personalized tumor therapy, understanding and addressing the heterogeneity of malignant tumors is becoming increasingly important. Heterogeneity can be found within one lesion (intralesional) and between several tumor lesions emerging from one primary tumor (interlesional). The heterogeneous tumor cells may show a different response to treatment due to their biology, which in turn influences the outcome of the affected patients and the choice of therapeutic agents. Therefore, both intra- and interlesional heterogeneity should be addressed at the diagnostic stage. While genetic and biological heterogeneity are important parameters in molecular tumor characterization and in histopathology, they are not yet addressed routinely in medical imaging. This article summarizes the recently established markers for tumor heterogeneity in imaging as well as heterogeneous/mixed response to therapy. Furthermore, a look at emerging markers is given. The ultimate goal of this overview is to provide comprehensive understanding of tumor heterogeneity and its implications for radiology and for communication with interdisciplinary teams in oncology. KEY POINTS::   · Tumor heterogeneity can be described within one lesion (intralesional) or between several lesions (interlesional).. · The heterogeneous biology of tumor cells can lead to a mixed therapeutic response and should be addressed in diagnostics and the therapeutic regime.. · Quantitative image diagnostics can be enhanced using AI, improved histopathological methods, and liquid profiling in the future..

Need for Objective Task-Based Evaluation of Image Segmentation Algorithms for Quantitative PET: A Study with ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 Multicenter Clinical Trial Data

Reliable performance of PET segmentation algorithms on clinically relevant tasks is required for their clinical translation. However, these algorithms are typically evaluated using figures of merit (FoMs) that are not explicitly designed to correlate with clinical task performance. Such FoMs include the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), and the Hausdorff distance (HD). The objective of this study was to investigate whether evaluating PET segmentation algorithms using these task-agnostic FoMs yields interpretations consistent with evaluation on clinically relevant quantitative tasks. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to assess the concordance in the evaluation of segmentation algorithms using the DSC, JSC, and HD and on the tasks of estimating the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumors from PET images of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The PET images were collected from the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6668/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0235 multicenter clinical trial data. The study was conducted in 2 contexts: (1) evaluating conventional segmentation algorithms, namely those based on thresholding (SUVmax40% and SUVmax50%), boundary detection (Snakes), and stochastic modeling (Markov random field-Gaussian mixture model); (2) evaluating the impact of network depth and loss function on the performance of a state-of-the-art U-net-based segmentation algorithm. Results: Evaluation of conventional segmentation algorithms based on the DSC, JSC, and HD showed that SUVmax40% significantly outperformed SUVmax50%. However, SUVmax40% yielded lower accuracy on the tasks of estimating MTV and TLG, with a 51% and 54% increase, respectively, in the ensemble normalized bias. Similarly, the Markov random field-Gaussian mixture model significantly outperformed Snakes on the basis of the task-agnostic FoMs but yielded a 24% increased bias in estimated MTV. For the U-net-based algorithm, our evaluation showed that although the network depth did not significantly alter the DSC, JSC, and HD values, a deeper network yielded substantially higher accuracy in the estimated MTV and TLG, with a decreased bias of 91% and 87%, respectively. Additionally, whereas there was no significant difference in the DSC, JSC, and HD values for different loss functions, up to a 73% and 58% difference in the bias of the estimated MTV and TLG, respectively, existed. Conclusion: Evaluation of PET segmentation algorithms using task-agnostic FoMs could yield findings discordant with evaluation on clinically relevant quantitative tasks. This study emphasizes the need for objective task-based evaluation of image segmentation algorithms for quantitative PET.

Differentiation of cancer of unknown primary and lymphoma in head and neck metastatic poorly differentiated cancer using 18 F-FDG PET/CT tumor metabolic heterogeneity index

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT tumor metabolic heterogeneity index (HI) and establish and validate a nomogram model for distinguishing head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) from lymphoma with head and neck metastatic poorly differentiated cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis was conducted on 1242 patients with cervical metastatic poorly differentiated cancer. 108 patients, who were clinically and pathologically confirmed as HNCUP or lymphoma, were finally enrolled. Two independent sample t-tests and χ 2 test were used to compare the clinical and imaging features. Binary logistic regression was used to screen for independent predictive factors.

RESULTS

Among the 108 patients), 65 patients were diagnosed with HNCUP and 43 were lymphoma. Gender ( P  = 0.001), SUV max ( P  < 0.001), SUV mean ( P  < 0.001), TLG ( P  = 0.012), and HI ( P  < 0.001) had statistical significance in distinguishing HNCUP and lymphoma. Female ( OR  = 4.546, P  = 0.003) and patients with HI ≥ 2.37 ( OR  = 3.461, P  = 0.047) were more likely to be diagnosed as lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

For patients with cervical metastatic poorly differentiated cancer, gender and HI were independent predictors of pathological type. For such patients, clinical attention should be paid to avoid misdiagnosing lymphoma as HNCUP, which may delay treatment.

Diagnosis and prognostic predictive value of delineation methods from 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR in pancreatic lesion

The aim was to utilize three segmentation methods on 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR images of pancreatic neoplasm patients, and further compare the effectiveness in differentiating benign from malignant, TNM-stage and prognosis. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with pancreatic neoplasm who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MR before treatment. The patients were categorized into malignant and benign groups. For each patient, the lesion was segmented by 3 thresholds and we recorded TNM-stage, treatment strategy, time to death, and the performance status of survivors. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of different threshold delineations between benign and malignant, as well as TNM-stage of adenocarcinoma patients. The optimal model of prognostic value was also assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. For both PET/CT and PET/MR, SUVmax had the best diagnostic efficacy in identifying malignant tumors. The background method of PET/MR exhibited the outstanding performance in M-stage (sensitivity/specificity, 92.90%/88.20%), with the weighted factor being whole-body total lesion glycolysis (WBTLG). In multivariate analysis, WBTLG (Exp [B] = 1.009; P = 0.009), and surgery (Exp [B] = 15.542; P = 0.008) were independent predictive factors associated with prognosis. This study found that SUVmax from PET/CT had the best diagnostic efficacy in identifying malignancy, while PET/MR showed higher specificity and accuracy for M-stage. The treatment strategy and WBTLG were independent prognostic factors in pancreatic neoplasm patients. PET/MR using the background method was identified as the optimal predictive model for prognosis.

Need for objective task-based evaluation of AI-based segmentation methods for quantitative PET

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods are showing substantial promise in segmenting oncologic positron emission tomography (PET) images. For clinical translation of these methods, assessing their performance on clinically relevant tasks is important. However, these methods are typically evaluated using metrics that may not correlate with the task performance. One such widely used metric is the Dice score, a figure of merit that measures the spatial overlap between the estimated segmentation and a reference standard (e.g., manual segmentation). In this work, we investigated whether evaluating AI-based segmentation methods using Dice scores yields a similar interpretation as evaluation on the clinical tasks of quantifying metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumor from PET images of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The investigation was conducted via a retrospective analysis with the ECOG-ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial data. Specifically, we evaluated different structures of a commonly used AI-based segmentation method using both Dice scores and the accuracy in quantifying MTV/TLG. Our results show that evaluation using Dice scores can lead to findings that are inconsistent with evaluation using the task-based figure of merit. Thus, our study motivates the need for objective task-based evaluation of AI-based segmentation methods for quantitative PET.

The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity in pretreatment neuroblastoma patients

BACKGROUND

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common tumour in children younger than 5 years old and notable for highly heterogeneous. Our aim was to quantify the intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity of primary tumour lesions by using 18F-FDG PET/CT and evaluate the prognostic value of intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity in NB patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 38 pretreatment NB patients in our study. 18F-FDG PET/CT images were reviewed and analyzed using 3D slicer software. The semi-quantitative metabolic parameters of primary tumour were measured, including the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The areas under the curve of cumulative SUV-volume histogram index (AUC-CSH index) was used to quantify intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity. The median follow-up was 21.3 months (range 3.6 - 33.4 months). The outcome endpoint was event-free survival (EFS), including progression-free survival and overall survival. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression models and Kaplan Meier survival plots.

RESULTS

In all 38 newly diagnosed NB patients, 2 patients died, and 17 patients experienced a relapse. The AUC-CSHtotal (r=0.630, P<0.001) showed moderate correlation with the AUC-CSH40%. In univariate analysis, chromosome 11q deletion (P=0.033), Children's Oncology Group (COG) risk grouping (P=0.009), bone marrow involvement (BMI, P=0.015), and AUC-CSHtotal (P=0.007) were associated with EFS. The AUC-CSHtotal (P=0.036) and BMI (P=0.045) remained significant in multivariate analysis. The Kaplan Meier survival analyses demonstrated that patients with higher intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity and BMI had worse outcomes (log-rank P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

The intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity of primary lesions in NB was an independent prognostic factor for EFS. The combined predictive effect of intra-tumoural metabolic heterogeneity and BMI provided prognostic survival information in NB patients.

Intact SMAD-4 is a predictor of increased locoregional recurrence in upfront resected pancreas cancer receiving adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Previous reports suggest that intact SMAD4 expression is associated with a locally aggressive pancreas cancer phenotype. The objectives of this work were to determine the frequency of intact SMAD4 and its association with patterns of recurrence in patients with upfront resected pancreas cancer receiving adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A tissue microarray was constructed using resected specimens from patients who underwent upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine with no neoadjuvant treatment for pancreas cancer. SMAD4 expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining. Associations of SMAD4 expression and clinicopathologic parameters with clinical outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven patients were included with a median follow up of 5.7 years. Most patients had stage ≥ pT3 tumors (75%) and pN1 (68%). All patients received adjuvant gemcitabine, and 79% of patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ten (8%) patients had intact SMAD4 expression. Grade was the only clinicopathologic parameter statistically associated with SMAD4 expression (P=0.05). Median overall survival was 2.1 years. On univariate analysis, SMAD4 expression was associated with increased locoregional recurrence (hazard ratio 7.0, P<0.01, 95% confidence interval: 2.8-18.0) but not distant recurrence (P=0.06) or overall survival (P=0.73). On multivariable analysis, SMAD4 expression (hazard ratio 9.6, P<0.01, 95% confidence interval: 3.7-24.8) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.3, P=0.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.8) were associated with higher and lower locoregional recurrence, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with upfront resected pancreas cancer, SMAD4 expression was associated with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence. Prospective evaluation of the frequency of SMAD4 expression and validation of its predictive utility is warranted.

The exploration of quantitative intra-tumoral metabolic heterogeneity in dual-time 18F-FDG PET/CT of pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyze the change of quantitative intra-tumoral metabolic heterogeneity consisting of texture features and conventional metabolic parameters of pancreatic cancer (PC) in dual-time 2-deoxy-2(18F) fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted considering the texture features and conventional metabolic parameters in dual-time 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of PC patients. Features were extracted based on spatial distribution of 18F-FDG uptake in image. Firstly, the texture features and the conventional metabolic parameters of the delayed scan were both compared with that of the early scan. Statistically different data was defined among them. Secondly, the study evaluated the correlations between retention index (RI) of the texture features and the conventional metabolic parameters. Finally, the variation of texture features in dual-time PET/CT of resectable PC patients and unresectable PC patients was calculated separately.

RESULTS

In total, 183 PC patients were analyzed retrospectively in this research. The conventional metabolic parameters were all statistically different between the early and delayed scans except for metabolic tumor volume (MTV). In the radiomics, there were 59 textural features. Nineteen of 59 texture features were statistically different between the early and delayed scans. Features that were more than 10% different during two scans were observed in a substantial percentage of patients. Weak correlations were only found between MTV, TLG (Total lesion glycolysis), SUVpeak and the RI of some texture features in early or delayed scans. There were obviously fewer features with significant difference in resectable PC group than in unresectable PC group. Most features showing the difference in unresectable group while no significant difference in resectable group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated the change and inner correlations of quantitative tumoral metabolic heterogeneity in the dual-time 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan of PC patients. Some features displayed the difference between dual-time scans. Conventional metabolic parameters were weakly related to the change of texture feature. The change of texture feature in resectable PC group was different from that in unresectable PC group. This result is potential to provide more information for the image evaluation of PC.

A Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation

Tumor segmentation in oncological PET is challenging, a major reason being the partial-volume effects (PVEs) that arise due to low system resolution and finite voxel size. The latter results in tissue-fraction effects (TFEs), i.e. voxels contain a mixture of tissue classes. Conventional segmentation methods are typically designed to assign each image voxel as belonging to a certain tissue class. Thus, these methods are inherently limited in modeling TFEs. To address the challenge of accounting for PVEs, and in particular, TFEs, we propose a Bayesian approach to tissue-fraction estimation for oncological PET segmentation. Specifically, this Bayesian approach estimates the posterior mean of the fractional volume that the tumor occupies within each image voxel. The proposed method, implemented using a deep-learning-based technique, was first evaluated using clinically realistic 2D simulation studies with known ground truth, in the context of segmenting the primary tumor in PET images of patients with lung cancer. The evaluation studies demonstrated that the method accurately estimated the tumor-fraction areas and significantly outperformed widely used conventional PET segmentation methods, including a U-net-based method, on the task of segmenting the tumor. In addition, the proposed method was relatively insensitive to PVEs and yielded reliable tumor segmentation for different clinical-scanner configurations. The method was then evaluated using clinical images of patients with stage IIB/III non-small cell lung cancer from ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 multi-center clinical trial. Here, the results showed that the proposed method significantly outperformed all other considered methods and yielded accurate tumor segmentation on patient images with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.86). In particular, the method accurately segmented relatively small tumors, yielding a high DSC of 0.77 for the smallest segmented cross-section of 1.30 cm². Overall, this study demonstrates the efficacy of the proposed method to accurately segment tumors in PET images.

High metabolic heterogeneity on baseline 18FDG-PET/CT scan as a poor prognostic factor for newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Metabolic heterogeneity (MH) can be measured using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and it indicates an inhomogeneous tumor microenvironment. High MH has been shown to predict a worse prognosis for primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, whereas its prognostic value in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains to be determined. In the current study, we investigated the prognostic values of MH evaluated in newly diagnosed DLBCL. In the training cohort, 86 patients treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone-like chemotherapies were divided into low-MH and high-MH groups using receiver operating characteristic analysis. MH was not correlated with metabolic tumor volume of the corresponding lesion, indicating that MH was independent of tumor burden. At 5 years, overall survivals were 89.5% vs 61.2% (P = .0122) and event-free survivals were 73.1% vs 51.1% (P = .0327) in the low- and high-MH groups, respectively. A multivariate Cox-regression analysis showed that MH was an independent predictive factor for overall survival. The adverse prognostic impacts of high MH were confirmed in an independent validation cohort with 64 patients. In conclusion, MH on baseline 18FDG-PET/CT scan predicts treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL.

A physics-guided modular deep-learning based automated framework for tumor segmentation in PET

An important need exists for reliable positron emission tomography (PET) tumor-segmentation methods for tasks such as PET-based radiation-therapy planning and reliable quantification of volumetric and radiomic features. To address this need, we propose an automated physics-guided deep-learning-based three-module framework to segment PET images on a per-slice basis. The framework is designed to help address the challenges of limited spatial resolution and lack of clinical training data with known ground-truth tumor boundaries in PET. The first module generates PET images containing highly realistic tumors with known ground-truth using a new stochastic and physics-based approach, addressing lack of training data. The second module trains a modified U-net using these images, helping it learn the tumor-segmentation task. The third module fine-tunes this network using a small-sized clinical dataset with radiologist-defined delineations as surrogate ground-truth, helping the framework learn features potentially missed in simulated tumors. The framework was evaluated in the context of segmenting primary tumors in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET images of patients with lung cancer. The framework's accuracy, generalizability to different scanners, sensitivity to partial volume effects (PVEs) and efficacy in reducing the number of training images were quantitatively evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and several other metrics. The framework yielded reliable performance in both simulated (DSC: 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 0.88)) and patient images (DSC: 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.76)), outperformed several widely used semi-automated approaches, accurately segmented relatively small tumors (smallest segmented cross-section was 1.83 cm2), generalized across five PET scanners (DSC: 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.76)), was relatively unaffected by PVEs, and required low training data (training with data from even 30 patients yielded DSC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.71)). In conclusion, the proposed automated physics-guided deep-learning-based PET-segmentation framework yielded reliable performance in delineating tumors in FDG-PET images of patients with lung cancer.

Development and validation of an 18F-FDG PET radiomic model for prognosis prediction in patients with nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

To identify an ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) radiomics-based model for predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of nasal-type extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 110 ENKTL patients were divided into a training cohort (n = 82) and a validation cohort (n = 28). Forty-one features were extracted from pretreatment PET images of the patients. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to develop the radiomic signatures (R-signatures). A radiomics-based model was built and validated in the two cohorts and compared with a metabolism-based model.

RESULTS

The R-signatures were constructed with moderate predictive ability in the training and validation cohorts (R-signature_PFS: AUC = 0.788 and 0.473; R-signature_OS: AUC = 0.637 and 0.730). For PFS, the radiomics-based model showed better discrimination than the metabolism-based model in the training cohort (C-index = 0.811 vs. 0.751) but poorer discrimination in the validation cohort (C-index = 0.588 vs. 0.693). The calibration of the radiomics-based model was poorer than that of the metabolism-based model (training cohort: p = 0.415 vs. 0.428, validation cohort: p = 0.228 vs. 0.652). For OS, the performance of the radiomics-based model was poorer (training cohort: C-index = 0.818 vs. 0.828, p = 0.853 vs. 0.885; validation cohort: C-index = 0.628 vs. 0.753, p < 0.05 vs. 0.913).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomic features derived from PET images can predict the outcomes of patients with ENKTL, but the performance of the radiomics-based model was inferior to that of the metabolism-based model.

KEY POINTS

• The R-signatures calculated by using ¹⁸F-FDG PET radiomic features can predict the survival of patients with ENKTL. • The radiomics-based models integrating the R-signatures and clinical factors achieved good predictive values. • The performance of the radiomics-based model was inferior to that of the metabolism-based model in the two cohorts.

Tumor Heterogeneity on FDG PET/CT and Immunotherapy: An Imaging Biomarker for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of quantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET parameters to predict outcomes of patients with malignant melanoma who have been treated with immune modulation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We retrospectively investigated 34 patients with malignant melanoma. Twenty-three patients received immunotherapy as first-line therapy, and 11 patients received it as second-line therapy. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), metabolic tumor volume, tumor lesion glycolysis, and intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity (as measured by the tumor heterogeneity [TH] index) were measured for the primary tumors and metastatic sites associated with up to five of the most FDG-avid lesions per patient. The TH index was calculated as the AUC value of a cumulative SUV volume histogram curve for all patients. The median follow-up was 29.5 months (range, 3-288 months). Outcome endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were used, and Cox regression analysis was performed for predictors of survival. RESULTS. A total of 101 lesions were analyzed. Five lesions were analyzed in 12 patients, four lesions in three patients, three lesions in three patients, two lesions in four patients, and one lesion in 12 patients. Of the 34 patients included in the study, 15 (44.1%) had disease progression and 11 (32.3%) had died by the time the last follow-up occurred. The mean (± SD) SUV_max, peak SUV, metabolic tumor volume, tumor lesion glycolysis, and TH values for all lesions were 9.68 ± 6.6, 7.82 ± 5.83, 81.96 ± 146.87 mL, 543.65 ± 1022.92 g, and 5841.36 ± 1249.85, respectively. TH had a negative correlation with SUV_max, peak SUV, and tumor lesion glycolysis (p < 0.0001 for all). CONCLUSION. The TH index is significantly associated with overall survival in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immune modulation therapy as first-line or second-line therapy.

Disease quantification on PET/CT images without explicit object delineation

PURPOSE

The derivation of quantitative information from images in a clinically practical way continues to face a major hurdle because of image segmentation challenges. This paper presents a novel approach, called automatic anatomy recognition-disease quantification (AAR-DQ), for disease quantification (DQ) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images. This approach explores how to decouple DQ methods from explicit dependence on object (e.g., organ) delineation through the use of only object recognition results from our recently developed automatic anatomy recognition (AAR) method to quantify disease burden.

METHOD

The AAR-DQ process starts off with the AAR approach for modeling anatomy and automatically recognizing objects on low-dose CT images of PET/CT acquisitions. It incorporates novel aspects of model building that relate to finding an optimal disease map for each organ. The parameters of the disease map are estimated from a set of training image data sets including normal subjects and patients with metastatic cancer. The result of recognition for an object on a patient image is the location of a fuzzy model for the object which is optimally adjusted for the image. The model is used as a fuzzy mask on the PET image for estimating a fuzzy disease map for the specific patient and subsequently for quantifying disease based on this map. This process handles blur arising in PET images from partial volume effect entirely through accurate fuzzy mapping to account for heterogeneity and gradation of disease content at the voxel level without explicitly performing correction for the partial volume effect. Disease quantification is performed from the fuzzy disease map in terms of total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and standardized uptake value (SUV) statistics. We also demonstrate that the method of disease quantification is applicable even when the "object" of interest is recognized manually with a simple and quick action such as interactively specifying a 3D box ROI. Depending on the degree of automaticity for object and lesion recognition on PET/CT, DQ can be performed at the object level either semi-automatically (DQ-MO) or automatically (DQ-AO), or at the lesion level either semi-automatically (DQ-ML) or automatically.

RESULTS

We utilized 67 data sets in total: 16 normal data sets used for model building, and 20 phantom data sets plus 31 patient data sets (with various types of metastatic cancer) used for testing the three methods DQ-AO, DQ-MO, and DQ-ML. The parameters of the disease map were estimated using the leave-one-out strategy. The organs of focus were left and right lungs and liver, and the disease quantities measured were TLG, SUV_Mean, and SUV_Max. On phantom data sets, overall error for the three parameters were approximately 6%, 3%, and 0%, respectively, with TLG error varying from 2% for large "lesions" (37 mm diameter) to 37% for small "lesions" (10 mm diameter). On patient data sets, for non-conspicuous lesions, those overall errors were approximately 19%, 14% and 0%; for conspicuous lesions, these overall errors were approximately 9%, 7%, 0%, respectively, with errors in estimation being generally smaller for liver than for lungs, although without statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Accurate disease quantification on PET/CT images without performing explicit delineation of lesions is feasible following object recognition. Method DQ-MO generally yields more accurate results than DQ-AO although the difference is statistically not significant. Compared to current methods from the literature, almost all of which focus only on lesion-level DQ and not organ-level DQ, our results were comparable for large lesions and were superior for smaller lesions, with less demand on training data and computational resources. DQ-AO and even DQ-MO seem to have the potential for quantifying disease burden body-wide routinely via the AAR-DQ approach.

Metabolic heterogeneity on baseline 18FDG-PET/CT scan is a predictor of outcome in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma

An important unmet need in the management of primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is to identify the patients for whom first-line therapy will fail to intervene before the lymphoma becomes refractory. High heterogeneity of intratumoral 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) uptake distribution on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans has been suggested as a possible marker of chemoresistance in solid tumors. In the present study, we investigated the prognostic value of metabolic heterogeneity (MH) in 103 patients with PMBCL prospectively enrolled in the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) 26 study, aimed at clarifying the role of PET in this lymphoma subtype. MH was estimated using the area under curve of cumulative standardized uptake value-volume histogram (AUC-CSH) method. Progression-free survival at 5 years was 94% vs 73% in low- and high-MH groups, respectively (P = .0001). In a Cox model of progression-free survival including dichotomized MH, metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis (TLG), international prognostic index, and tumor bulk (mediastinal mass > 10 cm), as well as age as a continuous variable, only TLG (P < .001) and MH (P < .001) retained statistical significance. Using these 2 features to construct a simple prognostic model resulted in early and accurate (positive predictive value, 89%; negative predictive value, ≥90%) identification of patients at high risk for progression at a point that would allow the use of risk-adapted treatments. This may provide an important opportunity for the design of future trials aimed at helping the minority of patients who harbor chemorefractory PMBCL. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00944567.

Textural features and SUV-based variables assessed by dual time point 18F-FDG PET/CT in locally advanced breast cancer

Aim

To study the influence of dual time point 18F-FDG PET/CT in textural features and SUV-based variables and their relation among them.

Methods

Fifty-six patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were prospectively included. All of them underwent a standard 18F-FDG PET/CT (PET-1) and a delayed acquisition (PET-2). After segmentation, SUV variables (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were obtained. Eighteen three-dimensional (3D) textural measures were computed including: run-length matrices (RLM) features, co-occurrence matrices (CM) features, and energies. Differences between all PET-derived variables obtained in PET-1 and PET-2 were studied.

Results

Significant differences were found between the SUV-based parameters and MTV obtained in the dual time point PET/CT, with higher values of SUV-based variables and lower MTV in the PET-2 with respect to the PET-1. In relation with the textural parameters obtained in dual time point acquisition, significant differences were found for the short run emphasis, low gray-level run emphasis, short run high gray-level emphasis, run percentage, long run emphasis, gray-level non-uniformity, homogeneity, and dissimilarity. Textural variables showed relations with MTV and TLG.

Conclusion

Significant differences of textural features were found in dual time point 18F-FDG PET/CT. Thus, a dynamic behavior of metabolic characteristics should be expected, with higher heterogeneity in delayed PET acquisition compared with the standard PET. A greater heterogeneity was found in bigger tumors.

Practical no-gold-standard evaluation framework for quantitative imaging methods: application to lesion segmentation in positron emission tomography

Recently, a class of no-gold-standard (NGS) techniques have been proposed to evaluate quantitative imaging methods using patient data. These techniques provide figures of merit (FoMs) quantifying the precision of the estimated quantitative value without requiring repeated measurements and without requiring a gold standard. However, applying these techniques to patient data presents several practical difficulties including assessing the underlying assumptions, accounting for patient-sampling-related uncertainty, and assessing the reliability of the estimated FoMs. To address these issues, we propose statistical tests that provide confidence in the underlying assumptions and in the reliability of the estimated FoMs. Furthermore, the NGS technique is integrated within a bootstrap-based methodology to account for patient-sampling-related uncertainty. The developed NGS framework was applied to evaluate four methods for segmenting lesions from F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography images of patients with head-and-neck cancer on the task of precisely measuring the metabolic tumor volume. The NGS technique consistently predicted the same segmentation method as the most precise method. The proposed framework provided confidence in these results, even when gold-standard data were not available. The bootstrap-based methodology indicated improved performance of the NGS technique with larger numbers of patient studies, as was expected, and yielded consistent results as long as data from more than 80 lesions were available for the analysis.

No-gold-standard evaluation of image-acquisition methods using patient data

Several new and improved modalities, scanners, and protocols, together referred to as image-acquisition methods (IAMs), are being developed to provide reliable quantitative imaging. Objective evaluation of these IAMs on the clinically relevant quantitative tasks is highly desirable. Such evaluation is most reliable and clinically decisive when performed with patient data, but that requires the availability of a gold standard, which is often rare. While no-gold-standard (NGS) techniques have been developed to clinically evaluate quantitative imaging methods, these techniques require that each of the patients be scanned using all the IAMs, which is expensive, time consuming, and could lead to increased radiation dose. A more clinically practical scenario is where different set of patients are scanned using different IAMs. We have developed an NGS technique that uses patient data where different patient sets are imaged using different IAMs to compare the different IAMs. The technique posits a linear relationship, characterized by a slope, bias, and noise standard-deviation term, between the true and measured quantitative values. Under the assumption that the true quantitative values have been sampled from a unimodal distribution, a maximum-likelihood procedure was developed that estimates these linear relationship parameters for the different IAMs. Figures of merit can be estimated using these linear relationship parameters to evaluate the IAMs on the basis of accuracy, precision, and overall reliability. The proposed technique has several potential applications such as in protocol optimization, quantifying difference in system performance, and system harmonization using patient data.