Evaluation of Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy and Orthotic Therapy for Bilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis

Non-syndromic craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis is characterized by the premature fusion of one or more major cranial sutures at birth or soon after. Single-suture non-syndromic craniosynostosis (NSC) is the most common form of craniosynostosis and includes the sagittal, metopic, unicoronal and unilambdoid subtypes. Characterized by an abnormal head shape specific to the fused suture type, NSC can cause increased intracranial pressure. Cranial sutures either originate from the neural crest or arise from mesoderm-derived mesenchymal stem cells. A mixture of environmental and genetic factors contributes to NSC, with genetic causes following a largely polygenic model. Physical examination is used to identify the majority of patients, but accompanying radiographic imaging can be confirmatory. The three major surgical techniques in use to treat NSC are cranial vault remodelling, strip craniectomy and spring-assisted cranioplasty. Surgical intervention is ideally performed in the first year of life, with a mortality of <1%. Health-care disparities contribute to delayed initial presentation and timely repair. Optimal timing of surgery and comparative outcomes by surgical technique remain under active study. School-age children with treated NSC on average have subtle, but lower cognitive and behavioural performance. However, patient-reported quality of life outcomes are comparable to those in control individuals.

Intraoperative Intracranial Pressure Changes in Children With Craniosynostosis Undergoing Endoscopic-Assisted Strip Craniectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Craniosynostosis can lead to progressive cranial and skull base deformities and can be associated with increased intracranial pressure (ICP), ophthalmological manifestations, behavioral changes, and developmental delay. Most published data on the incidence of elevated ICP include older children undergoing open surgical correction. Endoscopic-assisted release of fused sutures with postoperative helmet therapy is an established method for managing craniosynostosis presenting at an early age; however, the immediate effect of this approach on ICP in a young cohort has not been previously reported.

METHODS

Prospective data on 52 children undergoing endoscopic-assisted release of stenosed cranial sutures were included. Individuals were excluded if they underwent open correction or had previous cranial surgery. Individuals underwent a standardized endoscopic approach for each suture type. ICP was measured using an intraparenchymal sensor both before creation of the neosuture and after complete release of the stenosed suture. An ICP reading of >10 mm Hg was considered elevated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 5.3 months, range 1 to 32 months, and 94% was younger than 12 months. The mean opening pressure was 12.7 mm Hg, and the mean closing pressure was 2.9 mm Hg. Opening ICP ≥10 mm Hg was present in 58%, ≥15 mm Hg was present in 31%, and ≥20 mm Hg was present in 23%. No patient had an ICP above 10 mm Hg at closing. The mean percentage change in ICP among all craniosynostosis cases was a 64% decrease. Optic disk swelling was identified in 28 children preoperatively and improved in 22 children at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Elevated ICP may occur in infants with craniosynostosis at higher rates than previously reported. Endoscopic-assisted craniectomy has an immediate effect on lowering ICP and improving postoperative ophthalmological findings.

Craniometric and Aesthetic Outcomes in Craniosynostosis Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveTo systematically review the published comparative aesthetic outcomes, and its determinants, for craniosynostoses surgically treated by minimally-invasive cranial procedures and open cranial vault remodeling (CVR).DesignPRISMA-compliant systematic review.SettingNot-applicable.Patients/ParticipantsArticles were included if they compared spring cranioplasty, strip minimally-invasive craniectomy or CVR for outcomes related to aesthetics or head shape. Forty-two studies were included, comprising 2402 patients.InterventionsNone.Main Outcome Measure(s)The craniometric and PROM used to determine surgical outcomes.ResultsTwenty-five studies (59%) evaluated sagittal craniosynostosis, with metopic (7;17%) and unicoronal (4;10%) the next most prevalent. Thirty-eight studies (90%) included CVR, 24 (57%) included strip craniectomy with helmeting, 9 (22%) included strip craniectomy without helmeting, 11 (26%) included spring cranioplasty, and 3 (7%) included vault distraction. A majority of studies only used 1 (43%) or 2 (14%) craniometric measures to compare techniques. In sagittal synostosis, 13 (59%) studies showed no difference in craniometric outcomes, 5 (23%) showed better results with CVR, 3 (14%) with strip craniectomy, and 1 (5%) with springs. In studies describing other synostoses, 10/14 (71%) were equivocal. Subjective outcome measures followed similar trends. Meta-analysis shows no significant difference in cranial index (CI) outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures in patients with sagittal synostosis.ConclusionsThere is no difference in CI outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures. The majority of literature comparing craniometric and aesthetic outcomes between CVR and less invasive procedures shows equivocal results for sagittal synostosis. However, the heterogeneity of data for other craniosynostoses did not allow meta-analysis.

Craniosynostosis: Current Evaluation and Management

ABSTRACT

Craniosynostosis is characterized by the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures, which can lead to abnormal skull shape and restricted skull growth. Although most cases are present in isolation, some are associated with genetic syndromes, such as Pfeiffer, Muenke, Couzon, Apert, and others, which increases the complexity of care. Today, a spectrum of surgical options to treat craniosynostosis are available and range from traditional open cranial vault remodeling to newer and less invasive suturectomy-based techniques. Which procedure is offered to a patient depends on not only the specific synostosis pattern but also factors such as patient age, the need for additional procedures or interventions, and evidence of elevated intracranial pressure. Thorough consultations with families to discuss achievable goals for cosmesis and function are essential in providing optimal care to each impacted child.

The effect of minimally invasive suturectomy with postoperative cranial remolding orthotic treatment for an infant with bilateral coronal craniosynostosis

Minimally invasive suturectomy has been reported to significantly decrease the economic cost of treating infants with craniosynostosis. Nonetheless, treatment should be accompanied by a cranial remolding orthosis to maintain the constant correction and reshaping of the skull throughout the infant's development.

Evolution of Cranioorbital Shape in Nonsyndromic, Muenke, and Saethre-Chotzen Bilateral Coronal Synostosis: A Case-Control Study of 2-Year Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to quantify change in cranioorbital morphology from presentation, after fronto-orbital advancement, and at 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Volumetric, linear, and angular analyses were performed on computed tomographic scans of consecutive bilateral coronal synostosis patients. Comparisons were made across three time points, between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases, and against normal controls. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included: 11 were nonsyndromic, eight had Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and six had Muenke syndrome. Total cranial volume was comparable to normal, age-matched control subjects before and 2 years after surgery despite an expansion during surgery. Axial and sagittal vector analyses showed advancement and widening of the lower forehead beyond control values with surgery and comparable anterior position, but increased width compared to controls at 2 years. Frontal bossing decreased with a drop in anterior cranial height and advanced lower forehead position. Middle vault height was not normalized and turricephaly persisted at follow-up. Posterior fossa volume remained lower at all three time points compared to control subjects. Supraorbital retrusion relative to anterior corneal position was overcorrected by surgery, with values comparable to those of control subjects at 2 years because of differential growth. There was no difference at 2 years between syndromic and nonsyndromic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Open fronto-orbital advancement successfully remodels the anterior forehead but requires overcorrection to be comparable to normal at 2 years. Although there are differences in syndromic cases at presentation, they do not result in significant morphometric differences on follow-up. Posterior fossa volume remains lower at all time points.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Endoscopic surgical treatment of bilateral coronal craniosynostosis

Endoscopic surgery for single-suture synostosis has been widely adopted since its introduction over 2 decades ago. Its role in syndromic synostosis is emerging, both as a primary treatment and as the first stage in a multimodal treatment paradigm aimed at preventing the vexing turribrachycephaly seen in these children. In this video, the authors review the technique for endoscopic treatment of bilateral coronal craniosynostosis and discuss both the benefits and some of the concerns to look out for over time. They also review the long-term outcomes in a consecutive series of patients treated in this fashion.

The video can be found here: https://vimeo.com/516351348.

Comparative analysis of cranial vault remodeling versus endoscopic suturectomy in the treatment of unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis

OBJECTIVE

Unilateral lambdoid synostosis is the premature fusion of a lambdoid suture or sutures and represents the least common form of craniosynostosis, occurring in 1 in 40,000 births. Cranial vault remodeling (CVR) and endoscopic suturectomy with helmet therapy (ES) are surgical approaches that are used to allow for normal brain growth and improved craniofacial symmetry. The authors conducted a comparative outcomes analysis of patients with lambdoid synostosis undergoing either CVR or ES.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients with nonsyndromic lambdoid synostosis who underwent surgical correction identified from a single-institution database of patients with craniosynostosis seen between 2000 and 2018. Cranial growth was measured in head circumference percentile and z score.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (8 female and 11 male) with isolated unilateral lambdoid synostosis were identified (8 right and 11 left). Six underwent CVR and 13 underwent ES. No statistically significant differences were noted between surgical groups with respect to suture laterality, the patient's sex, and length of follow-up. Patients treated with ES presented and underwent surgery at a younger age than those treated with CVR (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0001, respectively). Operating and anesthesia time, estimated blood loss, and ICU and total hospital days were significantly lower in ES (all p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in pre- and postoperative head circumference percentiles or z scores between groups up to 36 months postoperatively. No patients required reoperation as of last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic management of lambdoid synostosis is safe, efficient, and efficacious in terms of intraoperative and long-term cranial growth outcomes when compared to CVR. The authors recommend this minimally invasive approach as an option for correction of lambdoid synostosis in patients presenting early in their course.

Cost comparison of surgical management of nonsagittal synostosis: traditional open versus endoscope-assisted techniques

OBJECTIVE

Management of craniosynostosis at an early age is important for mitigating the risk of abnormal cranial development, but treatment can result in significant expenses. Previous research has shown that endoscope-assisted craniectomy (EAC) is less costly than open cranial vault remodeling (CVR) for patients with sagittal synostosis. The aim of this study was to strengthen the existing body of healthcare cost research by elucidating the charges associated with open and endoscopic treatment for patients with nonsagittal synostosis.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of data obtained in 41 patients who underwent open CVR and 38 who underwent EAC with postoperative helmet therapy for nonsagittal, single-suture craniosynostosis (metopic, coronal, and lambdoid) between 2008 and 2018. All patients were < 1 year of age at the time of surgery and had a minimum 1 year of follow-up. Inpatient charges, physician fees, helmet charges, and outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean ages of the children treated with EAC and open CVR were 3.5 months and 8.7 months, respectively. Patients undergoing EAC with postoperative helmet therapy required more outpatient clinic visits in the 1st year than patients undergoing CVR (4 vs 2; p < 0.001). Overall, 13% of patients in the EAC group required 1 helmet, 30% required 2 helmets, 40% required 3 helmets, and 13% required 4 or more helmets; the mean total helmeting charges were $10,072. The total charges of treatment, including inpatient charges, physician fees, outpatient clinic visit costs, and helmet charges, were significantly lower for the EAC group than they were for the open CVR group ($50,840 vs $95,588; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the additional charges for postoperative helmet therapy and the more frequent outpatient visits, EAC is significantly less expensive than open CVR for patients with metopic, coronal, and lambdoid craniosynostosis. In conjunction with the existing literature on clinical outcomes and perioperative resource utilization, these data support EAC as a cost-minimizing treatment for eligible patients with nonsagittal synostosis.