Contemporary Characterization of Injury Patterns, Initial Management, and Disparities in Treatment of Facial Fractures Using the National Trauma Data Bank:

Fracture Patterns in Craniofacial Gunshot Wounds: A Seven-Year Experience

OBJECTIVE

To characterize facial fracture patterns and understand predictors of surgical repair and LOS with the objective of assisting providers in managing and understanding these complex injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort chart review study.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for patients admitted with gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the head, neck, or face between January 2013 and March 2020 at a level one trauma tertiary care hospital. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify associations with surgical repair and LOS.

RESULTS

Of the 578 patients with head, neck, or facial GSWs, 204 survived and sustained facial fractures. The maxilla (n = 127, 62%), orbit (n = 114, 55%), and mandible (n = 104, 51%) were the most fractured. Operative rates differed by location (p < 0.001) with highest rates for fractures involving the mandible (76%). In univariate analysis, overall facial fracture surgery was associated with transfacial injuries; mandible, palate and nasal fractures; tracheostomy; gastrostomy tube placement; ICU admission; and a longer-than-24 h ICU stay (all p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, predictors of surgical repair included a length of stay greater than 3 days (OR 2.9), transfascial injury (OR 3.7) and tracheostomy placement (OR 5.1; all p-values < 0.05), while nasal and mandible fractures were also associated with overall operative repair (OR 2.5 and 9.3, respectively; p-value < 0.05 for both). Univariate analysis showed that among patients with GSW injuries who underwent facial plastic reconstructive surgery (FPRS) with comorbid serious polytrauma, the inpatient LOS was predicted solely by the presence of subarachnoid, subdural and intracranial hemorrhage (p-value < 0.005). Subsequent multivariate analysis found that the only predictor for greater hospital LOS for patients who underwent surgical repair was earlier timing to FPRS of less than five days (OR 0.17) and placement of a gastrostomy tube (OR 7.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Managing facial fractures in GSW patients requires complex medical decision making with a consideration of functional and esthetic outcomes in the context of concomitant injuries and overall prognosis. Certain characteristics such as ICU admission, longer hospital stay, trajectory of GSW, tracheostomy placement, and specific operative locations are associated with higher rates of operative repair. Inpatient hospitalization LOS for patients who underwent FPRS was predicted by timing from admission to surgical repair.

Assign a systematic traumatological status in orbital fracture patients - A prospective cohort study

The study aims to clarify the injury profile and the causes leading to missed injuries in isolated orbital fracture patients. The hypothesis was that orbital fracture patients are prone to underdiagnosis, especially regarding injuries to other body parts. Both injury profiles and causes leading to missed injuries in isolated orbital fracture patients were evaluated in a prospective cohort study. The patients were examined systematically by the oral and maxillofacial surgeon and an on-call orthopaedic traumatologist. The patients were also referred to ophthalmology for consultation. The study includes 213 patients. Associated injuries of other body parts and additional facial injuries were found in 26.2% and 25.8% of the 213 patients, respectively. The most common injuries outside the facial region were upper limb injuries (10.8%) and traumatic brain injuries (9.4%). In all, 18.8% of the patients had at least one injury that was not suspected or diagnosed primarily. More specifically, 28.6% of injuries outside the facial region were found later, and 25.5% of additional facial injuries were not detected or suspected primarily. Of eye injuries requiring further ophthalmological care, 66.7% were found only at the ophthalmologist's examination. Isolated orbital fracture patients require comprehensive examination by traumatologists focusing on orthopaedic and intracranial injuries as well as facial injuries. Additionally, close collaboration with ophthalmologists is recommended in the early stage after injury.

The Center for Surgical Health (CSH): A Surgical Equity Intervention in Plastic Surgery

BACKGROUND

The Center for Surgical Health (CSH) works to improve surgical access for under-resourced communities in Philadelphia via patient navigation services. This study defined the social profiles, clinical needs, and satisfaction of patients engaging with the Plastic and Hand Surgery (PHS) division of CSH.

METHODS

Patients referred from June 2019 to October 2024 were included. Eligible patients received NE2AR support: navigation, education, empowerment, access to payers and providers, and screening for legal and social referrals. Patient demographic, insurance, and clinical data were collected and summarized using descriptive statistics. After completion of CSH services, all patients were surveyed to assess satisfaction with navigators and seven domains of the surgical care accessed through CSH using items from the National Cancer Institute Patient Satisfaction Navigator Interpersonal Survey and the RAND Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-18, two validated patient satisfaction surveys. PHS satisfaction scores were compared to non-PHS patients using two-sided t tests.

RESULTS

Of 1146 referrals to CSH, 128 (11.2%) were for PHS. The procedures sought included post-traumatic upper extremity (27.3%) and facial reconstruction (7.0%), gender-affirming surgery (25.0%), and lesion excision (22.7%). Most patients identified as Hispanic/Latinx (35.9%) or Black (36.2%), and 33.6% were primarily Spanish-speaking. A majority of referred patients (74.6%) did not have insurance at the time of referral. Sixty-three patients (49.2%) were eligible for CSH services. Navigators predominantly applied for state-based insurance, including Emergency Medical Assistance (70.1%) and Medicaid (17.7%). PHS patients were highly satisfied with navigators (mean, 38.3; SD, 6.3; max, 45) but were dissatisfied with the Financial Aspects (mean, 2.5; SD, 1.1; max, 5) and Accessibility/Convenience (mean, 3.4; SD, 0.8; max, 5) care domains. PHS patients were less satisfied with Financial Aspects relative to non-PHS patients (mean, 3.27; SD, 0.1; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

CSH navigators provided NE2AR surgical navigation for primarily uninsured and historically marginalized PHS patients and increased access to a variety of surgeries that would be otherwise difficult or impossible to obtain. Although PHS patients were generally satisfied, the results highlight persistent barriers for underresourced groups.

Opportunity Cost of Surgical Management of Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A Longitudinal Study

Study Design

Single-institution retrospective financial analysis.

Objective

Trauma care is consistently linked to inadequate reimbursement, posing a significant financial burden for large trauma centers. Data show that declining Medicare reimbursement rates have indirectly led to declining payment for all procedures covered by insurance. The goals of this study are to investigate the opportunity cost associated with contemporary surgical management of CMF trauma at our institution and to evaluate longitudinal financial trends.

Methods

Patients with operative facial fractures between 2015 and 2022 at Duke University Medical Center were included and compared to patients undergoing general otolaryngology, plastic surgery and oral surgery operations in the same period. Procedural codes, payor type, charges billed, collections, relative value units (RVUs) and other financial data were obtained and analyzed among the 2 patient populations. Comparative analysis was performed to assess the financial trends in data reported previously from 2007-2015.

Results

The collection rate at Duke University Medical Center for operatively managed CMF fractures remains significantly lower than non-CMF counterparts. Interestingly, the collection rate gap between CMF and non-CMF surgeries has narrowed when comparing to the data from 2007-2013. This is largely due to a decrease in collection rates for non-CMF procedures from 29.61% (2007-2013) to 26.57% (2015-2022) [P = 0.0001] and an increase in collection rates for CMF procedures from 17.25% (2007-2013) to 18.05% (2015-2022) [P = 0.0001].

Conclusions

Despite a slight improvement of the gap in reimbursement rates for CMF and non-CMF surgeries over the last several years, trauma care continues to have a negative financial impact on health care institutions.

Health Disparities Research in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Health disparities contribute significantly to disease, health outcomes, and access to care. Little is known about the state of health disparities in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS). This scoping review aims to synthesize the existing disparities research in FPRS and guide future disparities-related efforts.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

We conducted a scoping review in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Our search included all years through March 03, 2023. All peer-reviewed primary literature of any design related to disparities in FPRS was eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of the 12283 unique abstracts identified, 215 studies underwent full-text review, and 108 remained for final review. The most frequently examined topics were cleft lip and palate (40.7%), facial trauma (29.6%), and gender affirmation (9.3%). There was limited coverage of other areas. Consideration of race/ethnicity (68.5%), socioeconomic status (65.7%), and gender/sex (40.7%) were most common. Social capital (0%), religion, occupation, and features of relationships were least discussed (0.01% each). The majority of studies were published after 2018 (59.2%) and were of nonprospective designs (95.4%). Most studies focused on disparity detection (80.6%) and few focused on understanding (13.9%) or reducing disparities (5.6%).

CONCLUSION

This study captures the existing literature on health disparities in FPRS. Studies are concentrated in a few areas of FPRS and are primarily in the detecting phase of public health research. Our review highlights several gaps and opportunities for future disparities-related focus.

Pediatric Facial Fracture Associated Craniofacial and Cervical Spine Injury

Management of pediatric facial fractures depends on location and severity, age, and associated injuries. Accurate diagnosis of associated injuries is crucial for effective treatment. This study evaluates the incidence of associated injuries and seeks to determine the influencing factors to provide imaging guidance. A retrospective review of pediatric facial fractures from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank from 2017 to 2021 was completed. Associated cervical spine (c-spine), skull fracture, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and intracranial bleeding were evaluated. Demographics, fracture patterns, mechanisms, protective devices, and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were reviewed. A total of 44,781 pediatric patients with 65,613 facial fractures were identified. Of the total, 5.47% had a c-spine injury, 21.86% had a skull fracture, 18.82% had TBI, and 5.76% had intracranial bleeding. Multiple fractures significantly increased the rate of all associated cranial and c-spine injuries. Single midface fractures had the highest c-spine, TBI, and intracranial bleeding rates. With increasing age, there was a significant increase in c-spine injury and TBI, while there was a decrease in skull fractures. Motor vehicle accidents and GCS <13 were associated with significantly increased rates of all injuries. Among pediatric patients with facial fractures, 5.47% had a c-spine injury, 21.86% had a skull fracture, 18.82% had TBI, and 5.76% had intracranial bleeding. The authors' findings recommend c-spine imaging in older age and cranial imaging in younger patients. Multiple facial fractures, fractures of the midface, decreased GCS, and motor vehicle accidents increase the need for both c-spine and cranial imaging.

Insurance Status Predicts Hand Therapy Adherence following Flexor Tendon Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Many patients are not adherent to hand therapy rehabilitation following surgical repair of traumatic flexor tendon injuries, which can negatively affect surgical outcomes and long-term hand function. The authors aimed to identify the factors that predict patient nonadherence to hand therapy following flexor tendon repair surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 154 patients who underwent surgical repair of flexor tendon injuries at a level I trauma center between January of 2015 and January of 2020. A manual chart review was performed to collect demographic data, insurance status, injury characteristics, and details of the postoperative course, including health care use.

RESULTS

Factors significantly associated with occupational therapy no-shows included Medicaid insurance (OR, 8.35; 95% CI, 2.91 to 24.0; P < 0.001), self-identified Black race (OR, 7.28; 95% CI, 1.78 to 29.7; P = 0.006), and current cigarette smoker status (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.18 to 6.15; P = 0.019). Patients without insurance attended 73.8% of their occupational therapy visits, and patients with Medicaid attended 72.0% of their visits, rates significantly lower than the rate of those with private insurance (90.7%; P = 0.026 and P = 0.001, respectively). Patients with Medicaid were eight times more likely to seek emergency department care postoperatively than patients with private insurance ( P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant disparities in hand therapy adherence following flexor tendon repair surgery exist between patients with different insurance statuses, races, and tobacco use. Understanding these disparities can help providers identify at-risk patients to improve hand therapy use and postoperative outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

The risk of osteomyelitis after mandibular fracture is doubled in men versus women: analysis of 300,000 patients

Postoperative complications following mandibular fracture treatment vary from local wound infections to severe conditions including osteomyelitis and impaired fracture healing. Several risk factors have been associated with the development healing disorders, including fracture localisation, treatment modality and substance abuse. However, limited research on the sex-specific influence of these complications exists. A total of about 300,000 female and male patients with mandibular fractures were examined in two cohorts. After matching for confounders (age, nicotine and alcohol dependence, malnutrition, overweight, anaemia, diabetes, osteoporosis and vitamin D deficiency), two cohorts were compared with propensity-score-matched patients according to outcomes (osteomyelitis, pseudoarthrosis and disruption of the wound) within 1 year after fracture. There were significant differences between female and male patients regarding the occurrence of osteomyelitis (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval]: 0.621 [0.563; 0.686]) and disruption of the wound (OR [95% confidence interval]: 0.703 [0.632; 0.782]). Surprisingly, matching for the expected confounders did not change the results substantially. Sex plays a dominant role in determining the risk stratification for postoperative osteomyelitis and disruption of the wound, after accounting for other potential confounding factors. Additional research is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and to develop sex-specific strategies to prevent these complications.

Case of Accidental Trauma Resulting in Condylar Fractures in 3-Month-Old

While mandibular fractures represent the most common craniofacial injury in the pediatric population, craniofacial fractures in infants are rare. Diagnosis is challenging with nonspecific presenting symptoms and often limited radiographic imaging. We report a case of nondisplaced mandibular condylar head fractures in a 3-month-old patient as a result of a fall with impact onto the chin, with associated sublingual hematoma (Coleman's sign). Although the initially observed sole finding of sublingual hematoma raised concern for child physical abuse, detailed history, oral exam, and multidisciplinary review of radiologic records by pediatrics, otolaryngology, and child protection teams established the accidental trauma diagnosis. The patient was managed conservatively with normal resumption of feeding. Detailed history and multidisciplinary approach to the management of pediatric facial trauma are important in establishing diagnoses and management.

Trends in mandibular fractures in the USA: A 20-year retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND/AIM

The mandible is one of the most fractured bones in the maxillofacial region. This study analyzes trends in mandibular fracture patterns, demographics, and mechanisms since the early 2000s.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mandibular fractures were reviewed from the 2007, 2011, and 2017 National Trauma Data Bank including 13,142, 17,057, and 20,391 patients by year, respectively. This database contains hundreds of thousands of patients annually and represents the largest trauma registry in the United States. Variables included number of fractures, sex, age, injury mechanism, and fracture location. Mechanism of injury included assault, motor vehicle crash, fall, motorcycle, bicycle, pedestrian, and firearm. Anatomic locations based on ICD-9/10 codes included symphysis, ramus, condyle, condylar process, body, angle, and coronoid process. Frequencies were compared using Chi-square tests of homogeneity with effect sizes estimated using Cramer's V.

RESULTS

Mandibular fractures represent 2%-2.5% of all traumas reported in the database from 2001 to 2017. The proportion of patients sustaining a single reported mandibular fracture decreased from 82% in 2007 to 63% in 2017. Males consistently experienced 78%-80% of fractures. Eighteen to 54-year-olds experienced the largest percentages of fractures throughout the 21st century, while median age of fracture shifted from 28 to 32 between 2007 and 2017. The most common fracture mechanisms were assault (42% [2001-2005]-37% [2017]), motor vehicle crash (31%-22%) followed by falls (15%-20%). From 2001-2005 to 2017, a decrease was observed in assaults (-5%) and motor vehicle crash (-9%) and an increase in falls (+5%), particularly among elderly females. The mandibular body, condyle, angle, and symphysis represent approximately two-thirds of all fractures without a consistent temporal trend among them.

CONCLUSIONS

The temporal trends observed can be linked to shifting age demographics nationally that may aid clinicians in diagnosis and inform public safety policies aimed at reducing these injuries, particularly among the growing elderly population.

Predictors of Facial Fractures in Trauma Patients: Retrospective Review at a Level I Trauma Center

BACKGROUND

The incidence and causes of facial fractures differ between patients, but patterns arise within populations. These patterns vary by gender, age, and between countries. This study aims to determine variables to identify patients at risk for facial fractures in a United States trauma population.

METHODS

This is a single-center study of Trauma Registry data, inclusive of years July 1, 2016, to January 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were based upon all trauma patients. Confirmation of a non-isolated facial fracture (dependent variable) was verified using ICD10 diagnosis codes. A logistic regression was performed in SPSS to ascertain the effects of predictor variables on the likelihood that a trauma patient will experience a facial fracture.

RESULTS

20377 patients were included in the analysis based upon the requirements specified in the methods section; 1575 (7%) had a positive facial fracture. The logistic regression model was statistically significant (N = 18507, P < .01). Significant risk factors for facial fracture identified included helicopter transport (OR = 1.35, P < .01) and increasing injury severity scores (OR = 1.07, P < .01). Modes of injury most likely to predict facial fracture included assault (OR = 6.62, P < .01), moped (OR = 2.02, P < .01), and motorcycle trauma (OR = 1.55, P < .01). The discharge disposition most likely among facial fracture patients included short-term general hospital (OR = 1.71, P < .01) and intermediate care facility (OR = 4.47, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with traumatic injuries from assault, moped, and motorcycle accidents were more likely to present with facial fractures. These patients had more severe injuries, seen as increased ISS scores, higher likelihood of transport by helicopter, and the need for additional care after discharge.

Correlating the Bony Facial Trauma Score with Clinical Outcomes

Background: In 2017, the Bony Facial Trauma Score (BFTS) was developed to quantify and describe bony trauma of the face. Objective: To compare BFTSs for the need of hospital admission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgery, tracheostomy tube placement, cervical spine (c-spine) injury, and mortality. Methods: A retrospective review of patients sustaining bony facial trauma from January 1, 2017 to November 30, 2019 was done. Logistic regression modeling measured the association between BFTS and admission status, need for operative repair, tracheostomy, mortality, ICU admission, and c-spine injury. Results: Three hundred six patients were included for this analysis. Median BFTS was 3.5 (interquartile range, 5), while the average age was 45.0 years (standard deviation, 22.3). The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle accident (44.8%) and ground-level fall (32.5%). BFTS was found to correlate with the following (p < 0.05): admission (odds ratio [OR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.13), mortality (OR 1.05, 1.00-1.10), tracheostomy (OR 1.11, 1.07-1.17), operative management (OR 1.16, 1.11-1.22), ICU (OR 1.07, 1.03-1.11), and c-spine injury (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.11). Conclusion: A significant correlation was found between BFTS and all the outcomes investigated.

A multicentric, prospective study on oral and maxillofacial trauma in the female population around the world

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Approximately 20% of patients with maxillofacial trauma are women, but few articles have analysed this. The aim of this multicentric, prospective, epidemiological study was to analyse the characteristics of maxillofacial fractures in the female population managed in 14 maxillofacial surgery departments on five continents over a 1-year period.

METHODS

The following data were collected: age (0-18, 19-64, or ≥65 years), cause and mechanism of the maxillofacial fracture, alcohol and/or drug abuse at the time of trauma, fracture site, Facial Injury Severity Scale score, associated injury, day of trauma, timing and type of treatment, and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Between 30 September 2019 and 4 October 2020, 562 of 2387 patients hospitalized with maxillofacial trauma were females (24%; M: F ratio, 3.2:1) aged between 1 and 96 years (median age, 37 years). Most fractures occurred in patients aged 20-39 years. The main causes were falls (43% [median age, 60.5 years]), which were more common in Australian, European and American units (p < .001). They were followed by road traffic accidents (35% [median age, 29.5 years]). Assaults (15% [median age, 31.5 years]) were statistically associated with alcohol and/or drug abuse (p < .001). Of all patients, 39% underwent open reduction and internal fixation, 36% did not receive surgical treatment, and 25% underwent closed reduction.

CONCLUSION

Falls were the main cause of maxillofacial injury in the female population in countries with ageing populations, while road traffic accidents were the main cause in African and some Asian centres, especially in patients ≤65 years. Assaults remain a significant cause of trauma, primarily in patients aged 19-64 years, and they are related to alcohol use.

Less Operating and More Overtriage: National Trends in Interfacility Transfer of Facial Fracture Patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to characterize demographics, injury patterns, and initial management trends of facial fracture patients who were subject to interfacility transfer.

METHODS

Using the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2015, facial fracture patients arriving by interfacility transfer were included in the study.

RESULTS

Over 9 years, 171,618 patients were included, with 37.5 percent having an isolated facial injury. Isolated facial injury patients tended to be younger, less frequently white, more frequently assaulted, and more frequently underwent facial fracture operative repair during the index admission (all, p < 0.001). From 2007 to 2015, insurance coverage increased from 54.6 to 79.0 percent (R2 = 0.90, p < 0.001). In addition, there was a 45 percent proportional increase in patients 50 to 89 years of age compared to a 20 percent decrease in patients 0 to 39 years of age (both, R2 = 0.99, p < 0.001). The proportion of transfer patients with isolated facial injury increased over the study period (32.0 to 39.4 percent, R2 = 0.90, p < 0.001); however, there was a decline in operative intervention (29.5 to 22.1 percent, R2 = 0.94, p < 0.001) and a 151 percent increase in the proportion discharged from the emergency department upon transfer arrival (R2 = 0.99, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Facial fracture patients subject to interfacility transfer comprise a wide array of demographics and injury patterns, with most having concomitant injuries and only a minority undergoing immediate operative intervention. Over time, this demographic has become older, sustained more isolated facial injury, and undergone fewer immediate operative interventions and is more frequently insured and more frequently discharged from the emergency department upon transfer arrival, reflecting increasing rates of secondary overtriage.

Nasal and Naso-orbito-ethmoid Fractures

Craniofacial fractures are common among trauma patients. Nasal fractures are the most common craniofacial fracture. Understanding how to evaluate and manage craniofacial fractures is important for the craniofacial trauma consultant. This manuscript describes the appropriate workup and management of nasal and naso-orbito-ethmoid fractures.

Mind the Difference: Characterizing the Impact of Behavioral Health Disorders on Facial Trauma

BACKGROUND

Patients with psychiatric diagnoses are at greater risk for traumatic injury than the general population. Current literature fails to characterize how premorbid behavioral health disorders (BHDs) complicate craniofacial trauma. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients with premorbid BHD sustaining facial fractures.

METHODS

All adults in the 2013-2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets with facial fractures were identified. Demographics, injury characteristics, fracture patterns, and in-hospital outcomes were compared in patients with and without premorbid BHDs. BHDs included major psychiatric illnesses, alcohol or drug use disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or dementia.

RESULTS

Twenty-five percent of the 240,104 subjects with facial fractures had at least one premorbid BHD. Assault (29.9% versus 23.9%, P< 0.001), self-inflicted injury (2.9% versus 1.2%, P< 0.001), and multiple facial fractures (40.2% versus 38.7%, P< 0.001) were more common among the BHD group. The BHD group displayed significantly higher rates of nearly all in-hospital complications, including pneumonia (4.3% versus 3.3%, P< 0.001), substance withdrawal (3.9% versus 0.3%, P< 0.001), unplanned intubation (1.5% versus 0.9%, P< 0.001) and unplanned transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU, 1.3% versus 0.8%, P< 0.001). BHD was strongly predictive of pneumonia, unplanned intubation, and unplanned ICU admission in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BHD represent a subset of facial trauma characterized by different mechanisms and patterns of injury and premorbid health status. BHDs are associated with higher in-hospital complication rates and resource utilization. Understanding the relationship between craniofacial trauma and premorbid BHD creates opportunities to improve morbidity and resource utilization in this group.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health in Facial and Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction: Can We Do Better?

Social determinants of health (SDOH) are integral to consider when delivering craniomaxillofacial and facial reconstructive care for patients. The American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) has instituted a formalized multidisciplinary care team model that recognizes such determinants and has aggregated patient-led organizations to strengthen patients' education and support system. This review discusses the need for all surgeons engaged in facial and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction to consider SDOH in their practice. Additionally, we explore how factors such as race, insurance status, education level, cost, and access to follow-up care, impact surgical care for craniosynostosis, facial trauma, orthognathic surgery, head and neck cancer, and facial paralysis. We propose that the ACPA team model be applied to other societies that care for the broader scope of patients in need of facial and craniomaxillofacial reconstruction to strengthen the communication, collaboration, and standardization of care delivery that is personalized to the needs of each patient.

Secondary overtriage of isolated facial trauma

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary care, level I trauma center in a rural state.

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary transfer of certain facial trauma patients results in a burden of time, money, and other resources on both the patient and healthcare system; identification and development of outpatient treatment pathways for these patients is a significant opportunity for cost savings.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the treatment and disposition of un-complicated, stable, isolated facial trauma injuries transferred from outside hospitals and determine the significance of secondary overtriage.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review utilizing our institutional trauma database, including patients transferred to our emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients were identified by ICD9 or ICD10 codes and only those with isolated facial trauma were included.

RESULTS

We identified 538 isolated facial trauma patients who were transferred to our institution during the study period. The majority of those patients were transferred via ground ambulance for an average of 76 miles. Overall, 82% of patients (N = 440) were discharged directly from our institution's emergency department. Almost 30% of patients did not require any formal treatment for their injuries; the potential savings associated with elimination of these unnecessary transfers was estimated to be between $388,605 and $771,372.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a high rate of patients with stable, isolated facial trauma that could potentially be evaluated and treated without emergent transfer. The minimization of these unnecessary transfers represents a significant opportunity for cost and resource utilization savings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b- Economic and Cost Analysis.

National Trends in Pediatric Facial Fractures: The Impact of Health Care Policy

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injuries are significant sources of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Using a national database, this study aims to characterize pediatric facial fracture management and the effect of health care policy changes on populations receiving treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kids' Inpatient Database databases from 2000 to 2016. Pediatric patients admitted with a facial fracture diagnosis were included. Clinical outcomes include mortality, reduction of fracture during hospital stay, and open fracture reduction. The impact of the Affordable Care Act on patient demographics and management was assessed.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2016, 82,414 patients were managed for facial fractures, 8.3 percent of whom were managed after implementation of the Affordable Care Act (n = 6841). Mean age was 15.2 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.9:1. Significant racial disparities were identified before the Affordable Care Act: African American and Native American patients had decreased odds of having facial fracture reduction during the initial hospital stay (OR, 0.84 and 0.86, respectively), and identifying as either Hispanic or Native American was associated with higher odds of mortality (OR, 1.4 or 2.4, respectively). Race was not contributory to patient mortality after the Affordable Care Act. Before Affordable Care Act implementation, patients receiving care with no charge (including charity care/charity research) had lower odds of having an open reduction or any reduction; insurance status was not contributory to management after the Affordable Care Act.

CONCLUSION

Although the Affordable Care Act may have increased access to care for certain populations, race- and sex-associated differences in mortality rate and fracture management should be further investigated to ensure a national standard of equitable patient care.

Zygoma Fractures Are Associated With Increased Morbidity and Mortality in the Pediatric Population

BACKGROUND

Trauma involving the facial bones has been shown to be associated with high severity in previous studies. Characteristics of facial fractures in adults have been well described in the adult population, less so in the pediatric literature. Our investigation aims to define these epidemiological measures and risk factors for poor outcomes using the most recent data.

METHODS

The 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program data bank was examined to study facial fracture pattern, mechanism of injury, and demographic descriptive data to characterize pediatric trauma patients. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for morbidity and mortality in pediatric facial fracture patients.

RESULTS

Of 51,168 total pediatric trauma patients, 2917 (5.7%) presented with facial fractures. Motor vehicle trauma was the most common mechanism of injury. Maxillary/malar fractures was the most common fracture type overall. Mandibular fractures were most common in the 0 to 1 age category while nasal bone fractures were more common in older patients. Patients with mandible fractures experienced the highest rate of operative management. Zygoma fracture was highly associated with concomitant traumatic brain injury. Multivariable regression analysis showed that fracture of the zygoma, concomitant traumatic brain injury, and cervical spine injury were risk factors for increased mortality.

CONCLUSION

Facial fractures are a rare but significant form of trauma in the pediatric population. Our data suggests a slight change in fracture patterns compared to previous studies. Zygoma fractures, traumatic brain injury, and cervical spine injury are risk factors of increased mortality that clinicians should be aware of.

Health Equity and Healthcare Disparities in Plastic Surgery: What We Can Do

Amidst the unexpected losses and challenges of 2020, healthcare disparities and health equity have presided as noteworthy topics of national discussion among healthcare workers, governmental officials, and society at large. Health equity, defined as the opportunity for everyone to be as healthy as possible, may be achieved through the alleviation of healthcare disparities. Healthcare disparities are defined as "preventable differences in the burden of disease, injury, violence, or opportunities to achieve optimal health that are experienced by socially disadvantaged populations." While these concepts may be perceived as a departure from the core responsibility of plastic surgeons, it is of paramount importance to recognize how race, socioeconomic status (SES), and physical environment impact access to care, surgical outcomes, and postoperative recovery for vulnerable populations. In this communication, our purpose is two-fold: 1) to elucidate the existent healthcare disparities and associations with race and SES in craniofacial, trauma, breast, hand, and gender-affirming reconstruction; and 2) provide tangible recommendations to incorporate the concepts of health equity and healthcare disparities in clinical, research, community, and recruitment settings for plastic surgeons. Through such knowledge, plastic surgeons may glean important insights that may enhance the delivery of equitable and accessible care for patients.

Treatment of Facial Fractures at Safety-Net Hospitals: A National Analysis of Inpatient Burden and Cost

PURPOSE

Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) are vital in the care of trauma populations, but little is known about the burden of facial trauma presenting to SNHs. The authors sought to characterize the presentation and treatment of facial fractures across SNHs and determine the association between SNH care and healthcare utilization in patients undergoing fracture repair.

METHODS

Adult patients presenting with a facial fracture as their primary admitting diagnosis from the year 2012 to 2015 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample. The "safety-net burden" of each hospital was defined based on the proportion of Medicaid and self-pay discharges. Patient factors analyzed were sex, race, age, income level, insurance status, fracture location, and comorbidities. Hospital factors analyzed were safety-net burden, teaching status, geographic region, bed size, and ownership status. The main outcomes were length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, time to repair, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of 78,730 patients, 27,080 (34.4%) were treated at SNHs and 24,844 (31.6%) were treated at non-SNHs. Compared to non-SNHs, patients treated at SNHs were more likely to undergo operative repair at SNHs (65.8% versus 53.9%, P < 0.001). Overall mean LOS was comparable between non-SNH and SNH (3.43 versus 3.38 days, P = 0.611), as was mean hospital cost ($15,487 versus $15,169, P = 0.434). On multivariate linear regression, safety-net status was not a predictor of increased LOS, cost, or complications. However, safety-net status was significantly associated with lower odds of undergoing repair within 48 hours of admission (odds ratio 0.783, 95% confidence interval = 0.680-0.900, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Safety-net hospitals are able to treat facial trauma patients with greater injury burden and lower socioeconomic resources without increased healthcare utilization. Healthcare reform must address the financial challenges that endanger these institutions to ensure timely treatment of all patients.

Safe at the Plate: Acute Assessment and Management of Baseball-Related Craniofacial Injuries by On-Field Personnel

INTRODUCTION

Long regarded as "America's Past Time", over 8.6 million children partake in organized and recreational baseball. Although improved equipment has reduced contemporary injury rates, nearly half of pediatric baseball injuries requiring hospitalization are due to craniofacial trauma. Sideline personnel at the youth levels, often without advanced medical training, frequently act as first-responders in instances of acute craniofacial injury.

METHODS

An IRB-approved survey was distributed nationally to target field personnel working at youth, high school, collegiate, and professional baseball levels. Survey items included: comfort in assessing subtypes of acute craniofacial trauma (loss of consciousness (LOC), skull injury, orbital injury, nasal injury, and dental injury) via Likert scale, years of medical training, presence of an emergency action plan (EAP), and access to higher level care from emergency medical services (EMS) or a nearby hospital.

RESULTS

When comparing the amateur and professional cohorts, the respondents from professional teams were significantly more confident in assessing LOC (P = 0.001), skull injury (P < 0.001), orbital injury (P < 0.001), nasal injury (P < 0.001), and dental injury (P < 0.001). The professional teams had significantly more years of first aid training (P < 0.0001) and were significantly more likely to have an EAP (P < 0.0001). Professional teams also had a significantly higher average of reported craniofacial incidents (P = 0.0279).

CONCLUSION

The authors identified a significant disparity in comfort level between amateur and professional baseball field personnel for identifying and managing acute craniofacial trauma. Based on these findings, the authors were able to develop a rudimentary tool for on-field personnel to effectively assess and manage craniofacial injuries.

What Is the Effect of COVID-19-Related Social Distancing on Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma?

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of social distancing policies enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic on the epidemiology of oral and maxillofacial fractures at an urban, Level I trauma center in the United States.

Materials and Methods

The investigators designed a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample of 883 subjects who presented for evaluation of oral and maxillofacial fractures (OMF) between March 1 and June 30 in the years 2018 through 2020. The primary predictor variable was the evaluation of OMF during a period with social distancing policies (2020 – experimental group) or without social distancing policies in place (2018 or 2019 – control group). The primary outcome variables were the facial fracture diagnosis, the abbreviated injury scale (AIS), injury severity score (ISS), and the mechanism of injury. Appropriate univariate and bivariate statistics were computed, and the level of significance was set at P < .05 for all tests.

Results

The number of subjects presenting with OMF was lower during the period of social distancing (n = 235 in 2020) than during the periods without (2018: n = 330; 2019: n = 318). During the period of social distancing, there were more individuals who presented secondary to assault, whereas fewer individuals presented secondary to falls (P = .05). On average, those who presented in 2020 had more severe oral and maxillofacial injuries (mean AIS = 3.2 ± 1.2 in 2020 vs 3.0 ± 1.1 in 2019 and 3.0 ± 1.1 in 2018. P = .03) and more overall injuries (mean ISS = 20.7 ± 13.1 in 2020 vs 19.2 ± 12.5 in 2019; 17.8 ± 12.8 in 2018. P = .03).

Conclusions

The investigators found that during the period of social distancing through the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of OMF cases decreased but that the severity of oral and maxillofacial and overall injuries was higher.

Surgical Infection Society Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Patients with Traumatic Facial Fractures

Background: Facial fractures are common in traumatic injury. Antibiotic administration practices for traumatic facial fractures differ widely. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's (SIS's) Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee convened to develop guidelines for antibiotic administration in the management of traumatic facial fractures. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for pertinent studies. Pre-operative antibiotics were defined as those administered more than 1 hour before surgery. Peri-operative antibiotics were those administered within 1 hour of the start of surgery depending on the type of antibiotic and as late as ≤24 hours after surgery. Post-operative antibiotics were defined as those administered >24 hours after surgery. Prophylactic antibiotics were those administered for >24 hours without a documented infection. Evaluation of the published evidence was performed with the GRADE system. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: We recommend that in adult patients with non-operative upper face, midface, or mandibular fractures, prophylactic antibiotics not be prescribed and that in adult patients with operative, non-mandibular fractures, pre-operative antibiotics likewise not be prescribed. We recommend that in adult patients with operative, mandibular fractures, pre-operative antibiotics not be prescribed; and in adult patients with operative, non-mandibular facial fractures, post-operative (>24 hours) antibiotics again not be prescribed. We recommend that in adult patients with operative, mandibular facial fractures, post-operative antibiotics (> 24 hours) not be prescribed. Conclusions: This guideline summarizes the current SIS recommendations regarding antibiotic management of patients with traumatic facial fractures.

Treatment of Facial Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center: Do Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Enrollees Receive the Same Care?

BACKGROUND

Timing of surgical treatment of facial fractures may vary with the patient age, injury type, and presence of polytrauma. Previous studies using national data sets have suggested that trauma patients with government insurance experience fewer operations, longer length of hospital stay (LOS), and worse outcomes compared with privately insured patients. The objective of this study is to compare treatment of facial fractures in patients with and without Medicaid insurance (excluding Medicare).

METHODS

All adults with mandibular, orbital, and midface fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center between 2009 and 2018 were included. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences in the frequency of surgery, time to surgery (TTS), LOS, and mortality based on insurance type.

RESULTS

The sample included 1541 patients with facial fractures (mandible, midface, orbital), of whom 78.8% were male, and 13.1% (208) were enrolled in Medicaid. Mechanism of injury was predominantly assault for Medicaid enrollees and falls or motor vehicle accidents for non-Medicaid enrollees (P < 0.001). Patients with mandible and midface fractures underwent similar rates of surgical repair. Medicaid enrollees with orbital fractures underwent less frequent surgery for facial fractures (24.8% versus 34.7%, P = 0.0443) and had higher rates of alcohol and drug intoxication compared with non-Medicaid enrollees (42.8% versus 31.6%, P = 0.008). TTS, LOS, and mortality were similar in both groups with facial fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the treatment of facial fractures was similar regardless of the insurance type, but Medicaid enrollees with orbital fractures experienced less frequent surgery for facial fractures. Further studies are needed to identify specific socioeconomic and geographic factors contributing to these disparities in care.

Differences in Facial Fracture Patterns in Pediatric Nonaccidental Trauma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to characterize differences in facial fracture injury patterns among pediatric patients at highest risk of abusive head trauma/nonaccidental trauma (age ≤ 5 years).

METHODS

Using the National Trauma Databank from 2007 to 2015, patients (age ≤ 5 years) suffering facial fractures were included. Demographics and injury characteristics were compared between those sustaining accidental versus nonaccidental trauma (NAT).

RESULTS

Over 9 years 9741 patients were included with 193 patients (2.0%) suffering NAT. Nonaccidental trauma patients were younger (median [interquartile range]; 0 [0, 2] versus 3 [1, 4], P < 0.001), and more frequently were insured by Medicaid (76.7% versus 41.9%, P < 0.001). NAT patients were more likely to sustain mandible fractures (38.9% versus 21.1%, P < 0.001), but less likely to sustain maxilla (9.8% versus 18.3%, P = 0.003), or orbital fractures (31.1% versus 53.4%, P < 0.001). Nonaccidental trauma patients had fewer instances of multiple facial fracture sites (8.9% versus 22.6%, P < 0.001). Among those sustaining mandible fractures, NAT patients were more likely to sustain condylar fractures (75.8% versus 48.4%, P < 0.001), but less likely to sustain subcondylar fractures (0% versus 13.2%, P = 0.002), or angle fractures (1.6 versus 8.7%, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences exist in facial fracture patterns in accidental versus nonaccidental trauma within the pediatric population at highest risk for abusive head trauma. Specifically, NAT is associated with fractures of the mandibular condyle and involve fewer facial fracture sites. In the appropriate context, presence of these fractures/patterns should increase suspicion for NAT.