Methylprednisolone Therapy in Deceased Donors Reduces Inflammation in the Donor Liver and Improves Outcome After Liver Transplantation

Optimization of physiology in organ donors in the intensive care unit - what you need to know

ABSTRACT

Optimizing the physiology of organ donors is a critical component of preserving the option for organ donation and addressing the shortage of organs available for transplantation. In this article, we review common physiologic alterations seen in organ donors with a focus on brain-dead organ donors. These physiologic alterations and recommended interventions to optimize the physiology of the brain-dead organ donor are discussed by organ system, providing a framework for trauma surgeons and intensivists involved in the care of organ donors.

Impact of Organ Donor Pretreatment With Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in a Murine Model of Allogenic Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage organ failure. To improve transplantation outcomes, particularly of "marginal" organs from extended criteria donors (ECD), attempts have been made to therapeutically modulate donor or graft pre-transplantation. Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has a history as lymphocyte-depleting, immunosuppressive drug for treating rejection episodes post transplantation. In this study, however, we aimed to comprehensively analyze the effects of ATG donor pre-conditioning in a mouse model of kidney transplantation. ATG pre-treatment of potential donors led to a broad depletion of T- and NK cells in peripheral blood, non-lymphoid (including kidney) and lymphoid organs within 48 h, whereas myeloid cells were spared. ATG was also effectively depleting renal innate lymphoid type 1 and 2 cells. Importantly, transplantation of kidneys from ATG pre-treated donors into fully mismatched recipients showed only mild effects on leukocyte re-composition post transplantation. In line with this, serum creatinine and urea levels were similar in animals receiving kidneys from ATG treated donors or controls, demonstrating that donor treatment had no effect on allograft function in the early post-transplantation phase. In summary, our findings are suggestive of a more cell-type-specific depletion strategy in concert with an experimental model better reflecting aspects of clinical transplantation.

Intraoperative Anesthetic Strategies to Mitigate Early Allograft Dysfunction After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the most effective treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Hepatic insufficiency within a week of OLT, termed early allograft dysfunction (EAD), occurs in 20% to 25% of deceased donor OLT recipients and is associated with morbidity and mortality. Primary nonfunction (PNF), the most severe form of EAD, leads to death or retransplantation within 7 days. The etiology of EAD is multifactorial, including donor, recipient, and surgery-related factors, and largely driven by ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). IRI is an immunologic phenomenon characterized by dysregulation of cellular oxygen homeostasis and innate immune defenses in the allograft after temporary cessation (ischemia) and later restoration (reperfusion) of oxygen-rich blood flow. The rising global demand for OLT may lead to the use of marginal allografts, which are more susceptible to IRI, and thus lead to an increased incidence of EAD. It is thus imperative the anesthesiologist is knowledgeable about EAD, namely its pathophysiology and intraoperative strategies to mitigate its impact. Intraoperative strategies can be classified by 3 phases, specifically donor allograft procurement, storage, and recipient reperfusion. During procurement, the anesthesiologist can use pharmacologic preconditioning with volatile anesthetics, consider preharvest hyperoxemia, and attenuate the use of norepinephrine as able. The anesthesiologist can advocate for normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) and machine perfusion during allograft storage at their institution. During recipient reperfusion, the anesthesiologist can optimize oxygen exposure, consider adjunct anesthetics with antioxidant-like properties, and administer supplemental magnesium. Unfortunately, there is either mixed, little, or no data to support the routine use of many free radical scavengers. Given the sparse, limited, or at times conflicting evidence supporting some of these strategies, there are ample opportunities for more research to find intraoperative anesthetic strategies to mitigate the impact of EAD and improve postoperative outcomes in OLT recipients.

The decedent model: A new paradigm for de-risking high stakes clinical trials like xenotransplantation

The first 2 living recipients of pig hearts died unexpectedly within 2 months, despite both recipients receiving what over 30 years of nonhuman primate (NHP) research would suggest were the optimal gene edits and immunosuppression to ensure success. These results prompt us to question how faithfully data from the NHP model translate into human outcomes. Before attempting any further heart xenotransplants in living humans, it is highly advisable to gain a more comprehensive understanding of why the promising preclinical NHP data did not accurately predict outcomes in humans. It is also unlikely that additional NHP data will provide more information that would de-risk a xenoheart clinical trial because these cases were based on the best practices from the most successful NHP results to date. Although imperfect, the decedent model offers a complementary avenue to determine appropriate treatment regimens to control the human immune response to xenografts and better understand the biologic differences between humans and NHP that could lead to such starkly contrasting outcomes. Herein, we explore the potential benefits and drawbacks of the decedent model and contrast it to the advantages and disadvantages of the extensive body of data generated in the NHP xenoheart transplantation model.

Innate immune modulation in transplantation: mechanisms, challenges, and opportunities

Organ transplantation is characterized by a sequence of steps that involve operative trauma, organ preservation, and ischemia-reperfusion injury in the transplant recipient. During this process, the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) promotes the activation of innate immune cells via engagement of the toll-like receptor (TLR) system, the complement system, and coagulation cascade. Different classes of effector responses are then carried out by specialized populations of macrophages, dendritic cells, and T and B lymphocytes; these play a central role in the orchestration and regulation of the inflammatory response and modulation of the ensuing adaptive immune response to transplant allografts. Organ function and rejection of human allografts have traditionally been studied through the lens of adaptive immunity; however, an increasing body of work has provided a more comprehensive picture of the pivotal role of innate regulation of adaptive immune responses in transplant and the potential therapeutic implications. Herein we review literature that examines the repercussions of inflammatory injury to transplantable organs. We highlight novel concepts in the pathophysiology and mechanisms involved in innate control of adaptive immunity and rejection. Furthermore, we discuss existing evidence on novel therapies aimed at innate immunomodulation and how this could be harnessed in the transplant setting.

Guidelines for the Management of Adult Acute and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in the ICU: Neurology, Peri-Transplant Medicine, Infectious Disease, and Gastroenterology Considerations

OBJECTIVES

To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for adults with acute liver failure (ALF) or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) in the ICU.

DESIGN

The guideline panel comprised 27 members with expertise in aspects of care of the critically ill patient with liver failure or methodology. We adhered to the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures manual and conflict-of-interest policy. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the panel, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development.

INTERVENTIONS

In part 2 of this guideline, the panel was divided into four subgroups: neurology, peri-transplant, infectious diseases, and gastrointestinal groups. We developed and selected Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) questions according to importance to patients and practicing clinicians. For each PICO question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis where applicable. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence to decision framework to facilitate recommendations formulation as strong or conditional. We followed strict criteria to formulate best practice statements.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We report 28 recommendations (from 31 PICO questions) on the management ALF and ACLF in the ICU. Overall, five were strong recommendations, 21 were conditional recommendations, two were best-practice statements, and we were unable to issue a recommendation for five questions due to insufficient evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary, international experts formulated evidence-based recommendations for the management ALF and ACLF patients in the ICU, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on low quality and indirect evidence.

Severe primary graft dysfunction of the heart transplant is associated with increased plasma and intragraft proinflammatory cytokine expression

INTRODUCTION

Heart transplant results have constantly improved but primary left ventricle graft dysfunction (LV-PGD) remains a devastating complication early after transplantation. Donor and recipient systemic inflammatory response may be involved in immune activation of the transplant, and LV-PGD development. Here, we investigated donor and recipient plasma and intragraft cytokine profiles preoperatively and during LV-PGD and searched for predictive markers for LV-PGD.

METHODS

Donor and recipient plasma samples (n = 74) and myocardial biopsies of heart transplants (n = 64) were analyzed. Plasma and intragraft cytokine levels were determined by multiplexed and next-generation sequencing platforms, respectively. The development of LV-PGD during the first 24 hours, and graft function and mortality up to 1 year after transplantation, were examined.

RESULTS

Severe LV-PGD, but not mild or moderate LV-PGD, was significantly associated with early mortality, plasma high-sensitivity troponin elevation, and an increase in intragraft and plasma proinflammatory cytokines during reperfusion. Preoperative donor and recipient plasma cytokine levels failed to predict LV-PGD. Cytokine network analysis identified interleukins -6, -8, -10, and -18 as key players during reperfusion. Prolonged cold and total ischemia time, and increased need for red blood cell transfusions during operation were identified as clinical risk factors for severe LV-PGD.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe LV-PGD was associated with a poor clinical outcome. Donor and recipient plasma cytokine profile failed to predict LV-PGD, but severe LV-PGD was associated with an increase in post-reperfusion intragraft and recipient plasma proinflammatory cytokines. Identified key cytokines may be potential therapeutic targets to improve early and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation.

Hemodynamic Effects of High-dose Levothyroxine and Methylprednisolone in Brain-dead Potential Organ Donors

BACKGROUND

Hormonal replacement therapy is administered to many brain-dead organ donors to improve hemodynamic stability. Previous clinical studies present conflicting results with several randomized studies reporting no benefit.

METHODS

Consecutive adult donors (N = 199) were randomized to receive high-dose levothyroxine, high-dose methylprednisolone, both (Combo), or no hormonal therapy (Control). Vasopressor requirements using the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) were assessed at baseline, 4 h, and at procurement. Crossover to the Combo group was sufficient to require separate intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.

RESULTS

In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean (±SD) reduction in VIS from baseline to procurement was 1.6 ± 2.6, 14.9 ± 2.6, 10.9 ± 2.6, and 7.1 ± 2.6 for the levothyroxine, methylprednisolone, Combo, and Control groups, respectively. While controlling for the baseline score, the reduction in VIS was significantly greater in the methylprednisolone and Combo groups and significantly less in the levothyroxine group compared with controls. Results were similar in the per-protocol analysis.

CONCLUSION

High-dose methylprednisolone alone or in combination with levothyroxine allowed for significant reduction in vasopressor support in organ donors. Levothyroxine alone offered no advantage in reducing vasopressor support. Organ yield, transplantation rates, and recipient outcomes were not adversely affected.

Blocking protease-activated receptor 4 alleviates liver injury induced by brain death

Brain death (BD) induces a systemic inflammatory response that influences donor liver quality. Protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR4) is a thrombin receptor that mediates platelet activation and is involved in inflammatory and apoptotic processes. Therefore, we investigated the role of PAR4 blockade in liver injury induced by BD and its associated mechanisms. In this study, we constructed a BD rat model and treated rats with TcY-NH2, a selective PAR4 antagonist, to block PAR4 signaling at the onset of BD induction. Our results revealed that PAR4 protein expression increased in the livers of rats with BD. PAR4 blockade alleviated liver injury induced by BD, as indicated by lower serum ALT/AST levels and an improvement in histomorphology. Blood platelet activation and hepatic platelet accumulation in BD rats were reduced by PAR4 blockade. Additionally, PAR4 blockade attenuated the inflammatory response and apoptosis in the livers of BD rats. Moreover, the activation of NF-κB and MAPK pathways induced by BD was inhibited by PAR4 blockade. Thus, our results suggest that PAR4 contributes to liver injury induced by BD by regulating inflammation and apoptosis through the NF-κB and MAPK pathways. Thus, PAR4 blockade may provide a feasible approach to improve the quality of organs from BD donors.

Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation

Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for decades, due to their potent effects on innate immunity and tissue protective effects. However, some SOT centers are reluctant to administer GCs long-term because of the various related side effects. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of GCs in SOT. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to April 2021 using search syntaxes covering “transplantation” and “glucocorticoids”. GCs are used in transplant recipients, transplant donors, and organ perfusate solution to improve transplant outcomes. In SOT recipients, GCs are administered as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. GCs are also the cornerstone to treat acute antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejections. Addition of GCs to organ perfusate solution and pretreatment of transplant donors with GCs are recommended by some guidelines and protocols, to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury peri-transplant. GCs with low bioavailability and high potency for GC receptors, such as budesonide, nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery of GCs to specific organs, and combination use of dexamethasone with inducers of immune-regulatory cells, are new methods of GC application in SOT patients to reduce side effects or induce immune-tolerance instead of immunosuppression. Various side effects involving different non-targeted organs/tissues, such as bone, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, skin and gastrointestinal tract, have been noted for GCs. There are also potential drug-drug interactions for GCs in SOT patients.

[Perioperative management of the brain-dead organ donor : Anesthesia between ethics and evidence]

Hintergrund

Die Anzahl postmortal gespendeter Organe ist in Deutschland weit geringer als der Bedarf. Dies unterstreicht die Wichtigkeit einer optimalen Versorgung während des gesamten Prozesses der Organspende.

Fragestellung

Es existieren internationale Leitlinien und nationale Empfehlungen zu intensivmedizinischen organprotektiven Maßnahmen beim Organspender. Für das anästhesiologische Management fehlen evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen. Ziel dieser Übersichtsarbeit ist es, anhand der vorhandenen Evidenz die pathophysiologischen Veränderungen des irreversiblen Hirnfunktionsausfalls zu rekapitulieren und sich kritisch mit den empfohlenen Behandlungsstrategien und therapeutischen Zielgrößen auseinanderzusetzen. Auch auf ethische Aspekte der Betreuung des postmortalen Organspenders wird eingegangen.

Methode

Diese Übersichtsarbeit basiert auf einer selektiven Literaturrecherche in PubMed (Suchwörter: „brain dead donor“, „organ procurement“, „organ protective therapy“, „donor preconditioning“, „perioperative donor management“, „ethical considerations of brain dead donor“). Internationale Leitlinien und nationale Empfehlungen wurden besonders berücksichtigt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt ist die Evidenz für optimale intensivmedizinische und perioperative organprotektive Maßnahmen beim postmortalen Organspender sehr gering. Nationale und internationale Empfehlungen zu Zielwerten und medikamentösen Behandlungsstrategien unterscheiden sich teilweise erheblich: kontrollierte randomisierte Studien fehlen. Der Stellenwert einer Narkose zur Explantation bleibt sowohl unter pathophysiologischen Gesichtspunkten als auch aus ethischer Sicht ungeklärt.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die Kenntnisse über die pathophysiologischen Prozesse im Rahmen des irreversiblen Hirnfunktionsausfalls und die organprotektiven Maßnahmen sind ebenso Grundvoraussetzung wie die ethische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema postmortale Organspende. Nur dann kann das Behandlungsteam in dieser herausfordernden Situation sowohl dem Organempfänger als auch dem Organspender und seinen Angehörigen gerecht werden.

Hemodynamic management in brain dead donors

Donor management is the key in the complex donation process, since up to 20% of organs of brain death donors (DBD) are lost due to hemodynamic instability. This challenge is made more difficult due to the lack of strong recommendations on therapies for hemodynamic management in DBDs and more importantly to the epidemiologic changes in these donors who are becoming older and with more comorbidities (marginal donors). In the present manuscript we aimed at summarizing the available evidence on therapeutic strategies for hemodynamic management (focusing on vasoactive drugs) and monitoring (therapeutic goals). Evidence on management in elderly DBDs is also summarized. Donor management continues critical care but with different and specific therapeutic goals since the number of donor goals met is related to the number of organs retrieved and transplanted. Careful monitoring of selected parameters (possibly including serial echocardiography) is the clinical tool able to guarantee the achievement and maintaining of therapeutic goals. Despide worldwide differences, norepinephrine is the vasoactive of choice in most countries but, whenever higher doses (> 0.2 mcg/kg/min) are needed, a second vasoactive drug (vasopressin) is advisable. Hormonal therapy (desmopressin, corticosteroid and thyroid hormone) are suggested in all DBDs independently of hemodynamic instability. In the single patient, therapeutic regimen (imprimis vasoactive drugs) should be chosen also according to the potential organs retrievable (i.e. heart vs liver and kidneys).

Steroid pretreatment of deceased donors and liver allograft function - Ten years follow-up of a blinded randomized placebo controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Within the last decade numerous attempts have been reported in order to expand the donor pool and alleviate organ shortage in the setting of liver transplantation. Aim of this blinded randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effect of donor steroid pretreatment on outcomes after liver transplantation.

METHODS

We performed an international, multi-center double-blinded randomized placebo controlled trial. Donors received 1000 mg methylprednisone or placebo before organ procurement. Primary endpoint were patient and graft survival. Secondary end points were rate of BPAR and liver functions trajectories after transplantation. Follow up was 10 years.

RESULTS

There was no effect of steroid pretreatment vs. placebo on overall patient survival (50% vs. 46%, p = n.s.) as well as graft survival (47% vs. 51%, p= n.s.). Further donor steroid pretreatment did not alter the rate of biopsy proven acute rejections (34% steroid group vs. 36% placebo, p = n.s.). Evaluating short term and long term graft function, steroid pretreatment had minor effect on immediate liver function trajectories within the first 2 weeks after transplantation. This was not seen in long-term follow up.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion we found no evidence that donor steroid pretreatment translates in improved outcomes after liver transplantation.

Outcome measures in solid organ donor management research: a systematic review

AIM

We systematically reviewed published outcome measures across randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of donor management interventions.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with recommendations by the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and trial databases from 1980 to February 2021 for RCTs of donor management interventions.

RESULTS

Twenty-two RCTs (n=3432 donors) were included in our analysis. Fourteen RCTs (63.6%) reported a primary outcome relating to a single organ only. Eight RCTs primarily focused on aspects of donor optimisation in critical care. Thyroid hormones and methylprednisolone were the most commonly evaluated interventions (five and four studies, respectively). Only two studies, focusing on single organs (e.g. kidney), evaluated outcomes relating to other organs. The majority of studies evaluated physiological or biomarker-related outcomes. No study evaluated recipient health-related quality of life. Only one study sought consent from potential organ recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of RCTs evaluating donor management interventions only assessed single-organ outcomes or effects on donor stability in critical care. There is a need for an evaluation of patient-centred recipient outcomes and standardisation and reporting of outcome measures for future donor management RCTs.

Perioperative Perfusion of Allografts with Anti-Human T-lymphocyte Globulin Does Not Improve Outcome Post Liver Transplantation-A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Due to the lack of suitable organs transplant surgeons have to accept unfavorable extended criteria donor (ECD) organs. Recently, we demonstrated that the perfusion of kidney organs with anti-human T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) prior to transplantation ameliorates ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Here, we report on the results of perioperative ATLG perfusion in a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, feasibility trial (RCT) involving 30 liver recipients (LTx). Organs were randomly assigned for perfusion with ATLG/Grafalon^® (AP) (n = 16) or saline only (control perfusion = CP) (n = 14) prior to implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as graft function reflected by aspartate transaminase (AST) values at day 7 post-transplantation (post-tx). With respect to the primary endpoint, no significant differences in AST levels were shown in the intervention group at day 7 (AP: 53.0 ± 21.3 mg/dL, CP: 59.7 ± 59.2 mg/dL, p = 0.686). Similarly, exploratory analysis of secondary clinical outcomes (e.g., patient survival) and treatment-specific adverse events revealed no differences between the study groups. Among liver transplant recipients, pre-operative organ perfusion with ATLG did not improve short-term outcomes, compared to those who received placebo perfusion. However, ATLG perfusion of liver grafts was proven to be a safe procedure without the occurrence of relevant adverse events.

Brain death and management of the potential donor

One of the first attempts to define brain death (BD) dates from 1963, and since then, the diagnosis criteria of that entity have evolved. In spite of the publication of practice parameters and evidence-based guidelines, BD is still causing concern and controversies in the society. The difficulties in determining brain death and making it understood by family members not only endorse futile therapies and increase health care costs, but also hinder the organ transplantation process. This review aims to give an overview about the definition of BD, causes, physiopathology, diagnosis criteria, and management of the potential brain-dead donor. It is important to note that the BD determination criteria detailed here follow the AAN’s recommendations, but the standard practice for BD diagnosis varies from one country to another.

Optimal management of brain-dead organ donor

Maintaining a brain stem-dead (BSD) donor is specialized science. It is a daunting task as they are fragile patients who need to be handled with utmost care owing to extreme haemodynamically instability and need the best of monitoring for maintenance of organs. To ensure a successful transplant, a BSD donor first needs to be identified on time. This requires scrupulous monitoring of neurologically compromised patients who tend to be the most frequent organ donors. Once the donor is identified, an all-out effort should be made to legally obtain consent for the donation. This may require numerous sessions of counselling of the relatives. It needs to be performed tactfully, displaying the best of intentions. It is important to understand the physiology of a brain-dead individual. A cascade of changes occurs in BSD donor which result in a catastrophic plummeting of the clinical condition of the donor. All organ systems are involved in this clinical chaos, and best possible clinical support of all organ systems should be available and extended to the donor. Organ support includes cardiovascular, pulmonary, temperature, glycaemic, metabolic and hormonal. This article has been written as a follow-up article of previously published article on identifying an organ donor. It intends to give the reader a concept of what the BSD donor undergoes after brain death and as to how to maintain and preserve various organs for donation for successful transplantation of maximum organs.

Clinical characteristics and immunosuppressant management of coronavirus disease 2019 in solid organ transplant recipients

Over 1 000 000 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been confirmed since the worldwide outbreak began. Not enough data on infected solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are available, especially data about the management of immunosuppressants. We report two cases of COVID-19 in two transplant recipients, with different treatments and prognoses. The first patient received liver transplantation due to hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma and was confirmed to have COVID-19 9 days later. Following a treatment regimen consisting of discontinued immunosuppressant use and low-dose methylprednisolone-based therapy, the patient developed acute rejection but eventually recovered. The other patient had undergone a renal transplant from a living-related donor 17 years ago, and was admitted to the hospital because of persistent fever. This patient was also diagnosed with COVID-19. His treatment regimen consisted of reduced immunosuppressant use. No signs of rejection were observed during the regimen. In the end, the patient successfully recovered from COVID-19. These effectively treated cases can provide a basis for immunosuppressant management of COVID-19-positive SOT recipients.

Oral Preconditioning of Donors After Brain Death With Calcineurin Inhibitors vs. Inhibitors of Mammalian Target for Rapamycin in Pig Kidney Transplantation

Background: The systemic inflammatory cascade triggered in donors after brain death enhances the ischemia-reperfusion injury after organ transplantation. Intravenous steroids are routinely used in the intensive care units for the donor preconditioning. Immunosuppressive medications could be potentially used for this purpose as well. Data regarding donor preconditioning with calcineurin inhibitors or inhibitors of mammalian target for Rapamycin is limited. The aim of this project is to investigate the effects of (oral) donor preconditioning with a calcineurin inhibitor (Cyclosporine) vs. an inhibitor of mammalian target for Rapamycin (Everolimus) compared to the conventional administration of steroid in the setting of donation after brain death in porcine renal transplantation.

Methods: Six hours after the induction of brain death, German landrace donor pigs (33.2 ± 3.9 kg) were randomly preconditioned with either Cyclosporine (n = 9) or Everolimus (n = 9) administered via nasogastric tube with a repeated dose just before organ procurement. Control donors received intravenous Methylprednisolone (n = 8). Kidneys were procured, cold-stored in Histidine-Tryptophane-Ketoglutarate solution at 4°C and transplanted in nephrectomized recipients after a mean cold ischemia time of 18 h. No post-transplant immunosuppression was given to avoid confounding bias. Blood samples were obtained at 4 h post reperfusion and daily until postoperative day 5 for complete blood count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and electrolytes. Graft protocol biopsies were performed 4 h after reperfusion to assess early histological and immunohistochemical changes.

Results: There was no difference in the hemodynamic parameters, hemoglobin/hematocrit and electrolytes between the groups. Serum blood urea nitrogen and creatinine peaked on postoperative day 1 in all groups and went back to the preoperative levels at the conclusion of the study on postoperative day 5. Histological assessment of the kidney grafts revealed no significant differences between the groups. TNF-α expression was significantly lower in the study groups compared with Methylprednisolone group (p = 0.01) Immunohistochemistry staining for cytochrome c showed no difference between the groups.

Conclusion: Oral preconditioning with Cyclosporine or Everolimus is feasible in donation after brain death pig kidney transplantation and reduces the expression of TNF-α. Future studies are needed to further delineate the role of oral donor preconditioning against ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Examining consent for interventional research in potential deceased organ donors: a narrative review

In the last decade, research in transplant medicine has focused on developing interventions in the management of the deceased organ donor to improve the quality and quantity of transplantable organs. Despite the promise of interventional donor research, there remain debates about the ethics of this research, specifically regarding gaining research consent. Here, we examine the concerns and ambiguities around consent for interventional donor research, which incorporate questions about who should consent for interventional donor research and what people are being asked to consent for. We highlight the US and UK policy responses to these concerns and argue that, whereas guidance in this area has done much to clarify these ambiguities, there is little consideration of the nature, practicalities and context around consent in this area, particularly regarding organ donors and their families. We review wider studies of consent in critical care research and social science studies of consent in medical research, to gain a broader view of consent in this area as a relational and contextual process. We contend a lack of consideration has been given to: what it might mean to consent to interventional donor research; how families, patients and health professionals might experience providing and seeking this consent; who is best placed to have these discussions; and the socio-institutional contexts affecting these processes. Further, empirical research is required to establish an ethical and sensitive model for consent in interventional donor research, ensuring the principles enshrined in research ethics are met and public trust in organ donation is maintained.

The Cholinergic Anti-Inflammatory Pathway as a Conceptual Framework to Treat Inflammation-Mediated Renal Injury

BACKGROUND

The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, positioned at the interface of the nervous and immune systems, is the efferent limb of the "inflammatory reflex" which mainly signals through the vagus nerve. As such, the brain can modulate peripheral inflammatory responses by the activation of vagal efferent fibers. Importantly, immune cells in the spleen express most cholinergic system components such as acetylcholine (ACh), choline acetyltransferase, acetylcholinesterase, and both muscarinic and nicotinic ACh receptors, making communication between both systems possible. In general, this communication down-regulates the inflammation, achieved through different mechanisms and depending on the cells involved.

SUMMARY

With the awareness that the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway serves to prevent or limit inflammation in peripheral organs, vagus nerve stimulation has become a promising strategy in the treatment of several inflammatory conditions. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods have been used in many studies to limit organ injury as a consequence of inflammation. Key Messages: In this review, we will highlight our current knowledge of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, with emphasis on its potential clinical use in the treatment of inflammation-triggered kidney injury.

An update on the efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents for patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence shows that a propensity towards a pro-inflammatory status in the brain plays an important role in schizophrenia. Anti-inflammatory drugs might compensate this propensity. This study provides an update regarding the efficacy of agents with some anti-inflammatory actions for schizophrenia symptoms tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the National Institutes of Health website (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were systematically searched for RCTs that investigated clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 56 studies that provided information on the efficacy of the following components on symptom severity: aspirin, bexarotene, celecoxib, davunetide, dextromethorphan, estrogens, fatty acids, melatonin, minocycline, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), pioglitazone, piracetam, pregnenolone, statins, varenicline, and withania somnifera extract. The results of aspirin [mean weighted effect size (ES): 0.30; n = 270; 95% CI (CI) 0.06-0.54], estrogens (ES: 0.78; n = 723; CI 0.36-1.19), minocycline (ES: 0.40; n = 946; CI 0.11-0.68), and NAC (ES: 1.00; n = 442; CI 0.60-1.41) were significant in meta-analysis of at least two studies. Subgroup analysis yielded larger positive effects for first-episode psychosis (FEP) or early-phase schizophrenia studies. Bexarotene, celecoxib, davunetide, dextromethorphan, fatty acids, pregnenolone, statins, and varenicline showed no significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Some, but not all agents with anti-inflammatory properties showed efficacy. Effective agents were aspirin, estrogens, minocycline, and NAC. We observed greater beneficial results on symptom severity in FEP or early-phase schizophrenia.

Heterogeneity of Bile Duct Management in the Development of Ischemic Cholangiopathy After Liver Transplantation: Results of a European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association Survey

BACKGROUND

Surgical factors and direct cytotoxicity of bile salts on cholangiocytes may play a role in the development of ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) after liver transplantation (LTx). There is no validated consensus on how to protect the bile ducts during procurement, static preservation, and LTx. Meanwhile, IC remains the most troublesome complication after LTx.

AIM

To characterize bile duct management techniques during the LTx process among European transplant centers in cases of donation after brain death (DBD) and circulatory death (DCD).

METHOD

An European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association-European Liver Transplant Registry web survey designed to conceal respondents' personal information was sent to surgeons procuring and/or transplanting livers in Europe.

RESULTS

Sixty-five percent of responses came from large transplant centers (>50 procurements/y). In 8% of DBDs and 14% of DCDs the bile duct is not rinsed. In 46% of DBDs and 52% of DCDs surgeons prefer to remove the gallbladder after graft reperfusion. Protocols concerning preservation solutions (nature, pressure, volume) are extremely heterogeneous. In 54% of DBDs and 61% of DCDs an arterial back table pressure perfusion is performed. Steroids (20%-10%), heparin (72%-60%), prostacyclin (3%-7%), and fibrinolytics (4%-11%) are used as donor-protective interventions in DBD and DCD cases, respectively. In 2% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases a hepatic artery reperfusion is performed first. In 4% of DBD and 6% of DCD cases, fibrinolytics are administered through the hepatic artery during the bench and/or implantation.

CONCLUSION

This European web survey shows for the first time the heterogeneity in the management of bile ducts during procurement, preservation, and transplantation in Europe. In the context of sharing more marginal liver grafts, an expert meeting must be organized to formulate guidelines to be applied to protect liver grafts against IC.

Management of the Pediatric Organ Donor

Management of the pediatric organ donor necessitates understanding the physiologic changes that occur preceding and after death determination. Recognizing these changes allows application of the therapeutic strategies designed to optimize hemodynamics and metabolic state to allow for preservation of end-organ function for maximal organ recovery and minimal damage to the donor grafts. The pediatric pharmacist serves as the medication expert and may collaborate with the organ procurement organizations for provision of pharmacologic hemodynamic support, hormone replacement therapy, antimicrobials, and nutrition for the pediatric organ donor.

Serp-2, a virus-derived apoptosis and inflammasome inhibitor, attenuates liver ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice

BACKGROUND

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is an antigen-independent, innate immune response to arterial occlusion and ischemia with subsequent paradoxical exacerbation after reperfusion. IRI remains a critical problem after vessel occlusion and infarction or during harvest and surgery in transplants. After transplant, liver IRI (LIRI) contributes to increased acute and chronic rejection and graft loss. Tissue loss during LIRI has been attributed to local macrophage activation and invasion with excessive inflammation together with hepatocyte apoptosis and necrosis. Inflammatory and apoptotic signaling are key targets for reducing post-ischemic liver injury.Myxomavirus is a rabbit-specific leporipoxvirus that encodes a suite of immune suppressing proteins, often with extensive function in other mammalian species. Serp-2 is a cross-class serine protease inhibitor (serpin) which inhibits the inflammasome effector protease caspase-1 as well as the apoptotic proteases granzyme B and caspases 8 and 10. In prior work, Serp-2 reduced inflammatory cell invasion after angioplasty injury and after aortic transplantation in rodents. In this report, we explore the potential for therapeutic treatment with Serp-2 in a mouse model of LIRI.

METHODS

Wildtype (C57BL/6 J) mice were subjected to warm, partial (70%) hepatic ischemia for 90 min followed by treatment with saline or Serp-2 or M-T7, 100 ng/g/day given by intraperitoneal injection on alternate days for 5 days. M-T7 is a Myxomavirus-derived inhibitor of chemokine-GAG interactions and was used in this study for comparative analysis of an unrelated viral protein with an alternative immunomodulating mechanism of action. Survival, serum ALT levels and histopathology were assessed 24 h and 10 days post-LIRI.

RESULTS

Serp-2 treatment significantly improved survival to 85.7% percent versus saline-treated wildtype mice (p = 0.0135), while M-T7 treatment did not significantly improve survival (p = 0.2584). Liver viability was preserved by Serp-2 treatment with a significant reduction in serum ALT levels (p = 0.0343) and infarct scar thickness (p = 0.0016), but with no significant improvement with M-T7 treatment. Suzuki scoring by pathologists blinded with respect to treatment group indicated that Serp-2 significantly reduced hepatocyte necrosis (p = 0.0057) and improved overall pathology score (p = 0.0046) compared to saline. Immunohistochemistry revealed that Serp-2 treatment reduced macrophage infiltration into the infarcted liver tissue (p = 0.0197).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with Serp-2, a virus-derived inflammasome and apoptotic pathway inhibitor, improves survival after liver ischemia-reperfusion injury in mouse models. Treatment with a cross-class immune modulator provides a promising new approach designed to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury, improving survival and reducing chronic transplant damage.

Brain death-induced cytokine release is not associated with primary graft dysfunction: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between donor plasma cytokine levels and the development of primary graft dysfunction of organs transplanted from deceased donors.

METHODS

Seventeen deceased donors and the respective 47 transplant recipients were prospectively included in the study. Recipients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients who developed primary graft dysfunction; and group 2, patients who did not develop primary graft dysfunction. Donor plasma levels of TNF, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ assessed by ELISA were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine organs were retrieved, and 48 transplants were performed. Donor plasma cytokine levels did not differ between groups (in pg/mL): TNF, group 1: 10.8 (4.3 - 30.8) versus group 2: 8.7 (4.1 - 33.1), p = 0.63; IL-6, group 1: 1617.8 (106.7 - 5361.7) versus group 2: 922.9 (161.7 - 5361.7), p = 0.56; IL-1β, group 1: 0.1 (0.1 - 126.1) versus group 2: 0.1 (0.1 - 243.6), p = 0.60; and IFN-γ, group 1: 0.03 (0.02 - 0.2) versus group 2: 0.03 (0.02 - 0.1), p = 0.93). Similar findings were obtained when kidney transplants were analyzed separately.

CONCLUSION

In this sample of transplant recipients, deceased donor plasma cytokines TNF, IL-6, IL-1β, and IFN-γ were not associated with the development of primary graft dysfunction.

Efficacy and Safety of Steroid Therapy for Posttransplant Hyperbilirubinemia Caused by Early Allograft Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND Hyperbilirubinemia is a common event that occurs after liver transplantation. Hyperbilirubinemia is usually caused by early allograft dysfunction. Glucocorticoid is widely used for immunosuppression, but few studies have analyzed the effects of steroid therapy on posttransplantation hyperbilirubinemia. The aim of this study was to assess whether glucocorticoid was beneficial in treating hyperbilirubinemia caused by early allograft dysfunction. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with postoperative hyperbilirubinemia (those with conditions such as biliary complications and rejections were excluded) were randomly assigned, in a 2: 1 ratio, to the steroid and control groups. Patients in the steroid group were treated with glucocorticoid combined with ursodeoxycholic acid, whereas patients in the control group were only treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. The primary endpoint was decrease in bilirubin and the secondary endpoint was safety. RESULTS From 1st June 2016 to 30th April 2018, 40 patients were enrolled into the steroid group, and 20 were enrolled into the control group. Donor, recipient, and operative data were similar between the 2 groups. The decrease in bilirubin levels in the steroid group was significantly greater than that in the control group on the first day after the intervention was finished (9.25±1.30 mg/dL vs. 3.11±1.45 mg/dL, p=0.005), and after 2 weeks (15.01±1.20 mg/dL vs. 8.88±1.98 mg/dL, p=0.007). The steroid group did not have a higher complication rate but it did have a shorter postoperative hospital stay than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose steroid therapy was effective and safe for treating hyperbilirubinemia caused by early graft dysfunction, and it improved liver function.

Medical Management of Brain-Dead Organ Donors

With improving healthcare services, the demand for organ transplants has been increasing daily worldwide. Deceased organ donors serve as a good alternative option to meet this demand. The first step in this process is identifying potential organ donors. Specifically, brain-dead patients require aggressive and intensive care from the declaration of brain death until organ retrieval. Currently, there are no specific protocols in place for this, and there are notable variations in the management strategies implemented across different transplant centers. Some transplant centers follow their own treatment protocols, whereas other countries, such as Bangladesh, do not have any protocols for potential organ donor care. In this review, we discuss how to identify brain-dead donors and describe the physiological changes that occur following brain death. We then summarize the management of brain-dead organ donors and, on the basis of a review of the literature, we propose recommendations for a treatment protocol to be developed in the future.

Role of Methylprednisolone in the Management of Hemodynamically Unstable Brain-Dead Cases

OBJECTIVES

Optimal care of potential donors can lead to successful transplantation. Hemodynamic instability is a common complication in deceased potential donors. The most common underlying causes are hormonal and electrolyte disturbances as well as a hyperinflammatory state, which is rooted in activation of the cytokine cascade. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of methylprednisolone injection, an agent introduced for inflammation suppression to achieve more stability in cases of hemodynamic disturbances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study covered the period from April 2016 to June 2017 and included 45 randomly selected hemodynamically unstable brain-dead cases (mean arterial pressure < 60 mm Hg). For these cases, primary management included trying to achieve stability; however, after many hours, we experienced hemodynamic instability again. Because of no other correctable methods, we decided to use methylprednisolone injection. The potential deceased donors received a total of 1 g methylprednisolone in two 500-mg divided doses after transfer to the organ procurement unit.

RESULTS

Of 45 patients, 26 were male (58%), and the mean age of patients was 33 years. The most common causes of brain death were trauma (33%) and cerebrovascular accident (22%). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures increased significantly after methylprednisolone use. We observed no significant dif ferences in pulse rate. In addition, methylprednisolone could correct pH from 7.33 ± 0.11 to 7.38 ± 0.12 (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of methylprednisolone in hemodynamically unstable deceased donors could allow better management of these cases. Because there are various factors such as infusion of vasopressor drugs or fluid therapy that could affect the hemodynamic status of these cases, future studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to control these confounding factors.

Effect of Methylprednisolone on Liver Injury and Endotoxin Levels Following Brain Death in Rats

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Brain death impairs liver function in potential donors and is associated with inflammatory activation. Methylprednisolone treatment after brain death has been shown to reduce inflammatory activity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of methylprednisolone on liver injury and endotoxin levels in brain-dead rats.

METHODS

Thirty-two rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: a sham-operation group (Sham group), a brain death with methylprednisolone treatment group (Methy group), a brain death with saline treatment group (Saline group), and a brain death group (BD group). The rats were anesthetized and induced by gradually increasing the intra-cranial pressure using a Fogarty catheter balloon for brain death. All of the animals were observed and ventilated for 6 h prior to being euthanized. Hepatic pathologic histology (Knodell histology activity index), liver inflammatory cytokine levels, liver function and endotoxin levels were assessed.

RESULTS

After brain death, methylprednisolone markedly alleviated the Knodell histology activity index of liver injury (P < .05). Additionally, significant reductions in the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-10 were observed in the Methy group compared to those in the Saline and BD groups (P < .01), whereas no significant differences were found between the Saline and BD groups (P > .05). Interestingly, although the rate of liver injury after brain death in the methylprednisolone treatment group improved, the endotoxin level did not decline in the Methy group compared to the levels in the Saline and BD groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The present study verified that methylprednisolone was protective for liver injury in rats subjected to brain death. This protection appeared to be due to reduced inflammatory activity with no influence on the endotoxin level.

[Critical care management of the potential organ donor : Current recommendation for adults]

The shortage of donor organs has not improved in recent years. To increase the number and success of transplantation it is crucial to optimize the processes of early identification of potential organ donors and structured critical care management. The therapy starts long before brain death is diagnosed. Structured in-house organ donor management protocols ensure a highly qualified critical care that has a direct impact on the transplantation outcome. The therapy is based on the established standards. The main focus is on differentiated catecholamine and volume therapy. Vasopressin, in combination with norepinephrine, is effective for both treating vasoplegia and electrolyte disturbances. Despite poor evidence, steroids are useful for stabilizing hemodynamics and treating the consequences of neuroendocrine dysfunction. Overall, prospective studies are required to give general recommendations for critical care.

Control of Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplantation: Potentials for Increasing the Donor Pool

BACKGROUND

Organ shortage is a growing problem, with a rising number of organs being harvested from extended criteria donors, and this trend will further continue to increase as organ donors are getting older and have more comorbidities. Since this fact is immutable, efforts have been made to reduce the extent of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) as well as of direct and indirect harvest-related graft injury which affects all organs in a more or less distinct way.

METHODS

In liver transplantation (LT), the activation of Kupffer cells during organ reperfusion, thus provoking microcirculatory disturbances, hypoxia, and endothelial cell injury, is one of the key mechanisms causing graft dysfunction. Multiple approaches have been taken in order to find efficient preconditioning methods by pharmacological pretreatment, controlled induction of ischemia, controlled denervation of donor organs, and reconditioning with machine perfusion to prevent IRI, whereas marginal organs (i.e. steatotic grafts) are especially vulnerable.

RESULTS

The above-mentioned approaches have been pursued in experimental and clinical settings. At this time point, however, there is not yet enough clinical evidence available to recommend any particular drug pretreatment or any other intervention for organ preconditioning prior to transplantation.

CONCLUSION

The multifactorial pathophysiology in the setting of IRI in LT requires a multimodal therapeutic approach with the integration of pharmacological and technical means being applied to the donor, the organ per se, and the recipient. Currently, there is no consensus on standardized pretreatment of donor organs in order to improve the transplant outcome.

Graft Pre-conditioning by Peri-Operative Perfusion of Kidney Allografts With Rabbit Anti-human T-lymphocyte Globulin Results in Improved Kidney Graft Function in the Early Post-transplantation Period-a Prospective, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

Introduction: Although prone to a higher degree of ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI), the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) organs has become reality in transplantation. We therefore postulated that peri-operative perfusion of renal transplants with anti-human T-lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) ameliorates IRI and results in improved graft function.

Methods: We performed a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial involving 50 kidneys (KTx). Prior to implantation organs were perfused and incubated with ATLG (AP) (n = 24 kidney). Control organs (CP) were perfused with saline only (n = 26 kidney). Primary endpoint was defined as graft function reflected by serum creatinine at day 7 post transplantation (post-tx).

Results: AP-KTx recipients illustrated significantly better graft function at day 7 post-tx as reflected by lower creatinine levels, whereas no treatment effect was observed after 12 months surveillance. During the early hospitalization phase, 16 of the 26 CP-KTx patients required dialysis during the first 7 days post-tx, whereas only 10 of the 24 AP-KTx patients underwent dialysis. No treatment-specific differences were detected for various lymphocytes subsets in the peripheral blood of patients. Additionally, mRNA analysis of 0-h biopsies post incubation with ATLG revealed no changes of intragraft inflammatory expression patterns between AP and CP organs.

Conclusion: We here present the first clinical study on peri-operative organ perfusion with ATLG illustrating improved graft function in the early period post kidney transplantation.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03377283

Systematic review on the treatment of deceased organ donors

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no consensus on which treatments should be a part of standard deceased-donor management to improve graft quality and transplantation outcomes. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of treatments of the deceased, solid-organ donor on graft function and survival after transplantation.

METHODS

Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials that compared deceased-donor treatment versus placebo or no treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies were selected for this systematic review. Eleven studies were included for meta-analyses on three different treatment strategies. The meta-analysis on methylprednisolone treatment in liver donors (two studies, 183 participants) showed no effect of the treatment on rates of acute rejection. The meta-analysis on antidiuretic hormone treatment in kidney donors (two studies, 222 participants) indicates no benefit in the prevention of delayed graft function. The remaining meta-analyses (seven studies, 334 participants) compared the effects of 10 min of ischaemic preconditioning on outcomes after liver transplantation and showed that ischaemic preconditioning improved short-term liver function, but not long-term transplant outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to conclude that any particular drug treatment or any intervention in the deceased donor improves long-term graft or patient survival after transplantation.

Kupffer cell depletion by gadolinium chloride aggravates liver injury after brain death in rats

Brain death (BD) impairs liver function in potential donors, and is associated with hormonal and metabolic changes or molecular effects with pro‑inflammatory activation. Resident macrophages in the liver named Kupffer cells (KCs) undergo pro‑ or anti‑inflammatory pathway activation, which affects liver function. However, the role of the KCs in liver dysfunction following BD has not been fully elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of KCs in liver dysfunction in the context of BD and the effects of their inhibition by gadolinium chloride (GdCl3). Rats were randomly divided into the following groups: Control, BD with GdCl3 pretreatment and BD with normal saline pretreatment. Liver function, hepatic pathological histology and cytokine levels in the liver were assessed. Apoptosis and apoptosis‑related proteins [cleaved caspase‑3, caspase‑3 and apoptosis regulator Bcl‑2 (Bcl‑2)] were evaluated. GdCl3 significantly aggravated liver injury by elevating alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels (P<0.05) by inhibiting KCs. Interleukin (IL)‑1β and tumor necrosis factor α levels in the GdCl3 group were significantly increased compared with those in the control and saline groups (P<0.01). However, IL‑10 levels in the GdCl3 group were significantly reduced compared with those in the saline group (P<0.05). Caspase‑3 and cleaved caspase‑3 activation, and apoptosis induction in the context of BD were also significantly aggravated by the depletion of KCs, whereas Bcl‑2 was significantly suppressed by the administration of GdCl3. The present study indicated that GdCl3 efficiently inhibits the activity of KCs, and is involved in the onset of liver injury through its effects on pro‑inflammatory and anti‑inflammatory activation. KCs are protective in the liver in the context of BD. This protection appears to be due to KCs secretion of the potent anti‑inflammatory cytokine IL‑10, suggesting that KCs are an attractive target for the prevention and treatment of liver injury in the context of BD in rats.

Organ-Protective Intensive Care in Organ Donors

BACKGROUND

The ascertainment of brain death (the irreversible, total loss of brain function) gives the physician the opportunity to limit or stop further treatment. Alternatively, if the brain-dead individual is an organ donor, the mode of treatment can be changed from patient-centered to donationcentered. Consensus-derived recommendations for the organ-protective treatment of brain-dead organ donors are not yet available in Germany.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, and on the authors' clinical experience.

RESULTS

Brain death causes major pathophysiological changes, including an increase in catecholamine levels and a sudden drop in the concentration of multiple hormones, among them antidiuretic hormone, cortisol, insulin, and triand tetraiodothyronine. These changes affect the function of all organ systems, as well as the hemodynamic state and the regulation of body temperature. The use of standardized donor management protocols might well increase the rate of transplanted organs per donor and improve the quality of the transplanted organs. In addition, the administration of methylprednisolone, desmopressin, and vasopressin could be a useful supplement to treatment in some cases. Randomized controlled trials have not yet demonstrated either improved organ function or prolonged survival of the transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

The evidence base for organ-protective intensive care is weak; most of the available evidence is on the level of expert opinion. There is good reason to believe, however, that the continuation of intensive care, in the sense of early donor management, can make organ transplantation more successful both by increasing the number of transplantable organs and by improving organ quality.

Down-regulation of inflammatory signaling pathways despite up-regulation of Toll-like receptors; the effects of corticosteroid therapy in brain-dead kidney donors, a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The brain death of a potential organ donor induces a systemic inflammatory response, resulting in inferior organ quality and function. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of methylprednisolone (MPN) therapy on pattern recognition receptor (PRR) signaling in potential brain-dead (BD) kidney donors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To evaluate the effects of MPN therapy on PRR signaling in BD kidney donors we performed a prospective randomized treatment-versus-control study. Fifty-one potential kidney donors were randomly divided into three groups: brain-dead donors (BDDs) who received 15 mg/kg/d of methylprednisolone (group T1, n = 17), BDDs who received 15 mg/kg/d of MPN at the time of filling consent for kidney donation and 100 mg/2 h until kidney harvest (group T2, n = 17), and normal donors as controls n = 17. Gene expression for Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 1-9 and their signaling pathway molecules including MYD88, TRIF, NF-KB1, IRAK, IRF3, and IRF7, as well as the inflammatory cytokines RANTES, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, CXCL8, IL-18, IFN-α, and IFN-β was determined by PCR array. Due to the crucial role of TLRs 2 and 4 in pattern recognition, surface expression of these molecules was analyzed by flow cytometry. Plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines were measured by immunoassay. Finally, serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured in 100 kidney recipients one week and one, three, and six months after transplant.

RESULT

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array gene expression revealed greater expression of TLRs and signaling molecules in group T1 than in the controls. Surface expression of TLRs 2 and 4 were significantly greater in group T2 than in group T1 (P < .05). Plasma concentrations of inflammatory cytokines were significantly greater in group T1 than in controls (P < .05). The recipients that received kidneys from group T1 had significantly higher levels of creatinine and cystatin C than the recipients of kidneys from both group T1 and controls (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Administration of MPN to BDDs at specified periods until kidney harvest resulted in less systemic inflammation in the BDDs and improved renal function in kidney graft recipients compared with common MPN therapy.

Understanding the effect of corticosteroid pretreatment in brain-dead organ donors: new mechanistic insights for improvement of organ quality in liver transplantation

Transplant surgeons are currently faced with the challenge to accept marginal liver transplants due to steatosis or old age. Improving organ quality by implementing a selective organ protective donor management could be the first step towards a graft of enhanced quality. However, the molecular mechanisms of such treatments are still poorly understood. Glucocorticoid medication in donor medicine has been carried out and discussed for a long time. In a recent study published in Clinical Science, Jiménez-Castro et al. [Clin. Sci. (2017) 131, 733-746] demonstrate how liver histology and transplant liver function can be improved by administration of glucocorticoids to brain-dead donor rats with steatotic livers. This work illustrates the need for further trials in order to selectively improve the quality of steatotic livers with a potential for liver transplantation.

Emerging graft protective strategies in clinical liver transplantation

There have been remarkable efforts to characterize the key responsible pathophysiologic mechanisms, as well as to ameliorate the organ preservation and ischemia reperfusion injury with the ultimate goal of expanding the donor pool and further improvement of the outcomes of liver transplantation. Attempts to translate the experimental results from bench to bedside have yielded no valid protective concepts in the field of clinical liver transplantation yet. Nonetheless, there has been a considerable amount of ongoing clinical research to develop clinically relevant graft protective strategies. Areas covered: This review focuses on the most recent evidence based findings and ongoing clinical trials that might lead to emerging graft protective strategies in the field of clinical liver transplantation. New evidence-based findings in the donor preconditioning, organ preservation, and perioperative pharmacologic graft protection strategies in the recipient are reviewed. Expert commentary: Few strategies have been shown to exert some graft protective effects against ischemia reperfusion injury in recent clinical trials in liver transplantation. Among others, 'dynamic graft preservation' techniques have been emerging as more promising graft optimization strategies.

Effect of corticosteroid administration on neurologically deceased organ donors and transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This review investigates the impact of corticosteroids on donation rates and transplant outcomes in light of findings from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and to highlight the sources of uncertainty in this unresolved donor management issue.

DATA SOURCES

We searched electronic databases, trial registries and conference proceedings for RCTs evaluating corticosteroid therapy in neurologically deceased donors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Independent reviewers assessed eligibility, evaluated risk of bias and abstracted data, including donor haemodynamic data, number of organs recovered and transplant outcomes. Where possible, we pooled results. For each outcome, we assessed the overall quality of evidence using The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eleven RCTs with different corticosteroid regimens were included. Most trials assessed a once-daily infusion of methylprednisolone. Aside from one study showing improved liver graft function, no individual study or pooled analysis showed benefit of corticosteroids for any outcome: vasopressor use (three trials; relative risk (RR) 0.96; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.05), multiple organs recovered (two trials; RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.11), acute graft rejection (three trials; RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.39) or graft dysfunction (eight trials; RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.24). Two trials investigated adverse effects and found similar rates between groups. Quality of evidence was moderate or low for all outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Current clinical trials are limited in numbers and size to identify benefits or harms of corticosteroid therapy for deceased organ donors. In the face of these results, administering or withholding steroids both appear reasonable courses of action.

Innate inflammatory gene expression profiling in potential brain-dead donors: detailed investigation of the effect of common corticosteroid therapy

Our study aimed to assess the influence of common methylprednisolone therapy on innate inflammatory factors in potential brain-dead organ donors (BDDs). The study groups consisted of 50 potential BDDs who received 15 mg/kg/d methylprednisolone and 25 live organ donors (LDs) as control group. Innate immunity gene expression profiling was performed by RT-PCR array. Soluble serum cytokines and chemokines, complement components, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and high mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) were measured by ELISA. Surface expression of TLR2 and TLR4 were determined using flow cytometry. Gene expression profiling revealed up-regulation of TLRs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, MYD88, NF-κB, NF-κB1A, IRAK1, STAT3, JAK2, TNF-α, IL-1β, CD86 and CD14 in the BDD group. Remarkably, the serum levels of C-reactive protein and HSP70 were considerably higher in the BDD group. In addition, serum amounts of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, HMGB1, HSP70, C3a and C5a, but not IL-8, sCD86 or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, were significantly increased in the BDD group. Significant differences were observed in flow cytometry analysis of TLR2 and TLR4 between the two groups. In summary, common methylprednisolone therapy in BDDs did not adequately reduce systemic inflammation, which could be due to inadequate doses or inefficient impact on other inflammatory-inducing pathways, for example oxidative stress or production of damage-associated molecules.

Practical Recommendations for Long-term Management of Modifiable Risks in Kidney and Liver Transplant Recipients: A Guidance Report and Clinical Checklist by the Consensus on Managing Modifiable Risk in Transplantation (COMMIT) Group

Short-term patient and graft outcomes continue to improve after kidney and liver transplantation, with 1-year survival rates over 80%; however, improving longer-term outcomes remains a challenge. Improving the function of grafts and health of recipients would not only enhance quality and length of life, but would also reduce the need for retransplantation, and thus increase the number of organs available for transplant. The clinical transplant community needs to identify and manage those patient modifiable factors, to decrease the risk of graft failure, and improve longer-term outcomes.COMMIT was formed in 2015 and is composed of 20 leading kidney and liver transplant specialists from 9 countries across Europe. The group's remit is to provide expert guidance for the long-term management of kidney and liver transplant patients, with the aim of improving outcomes by minimizing modifiable risks associated with poor graft and patient survival posttransplant.The objective of this supplement is to provide specific, practical recommendations, through the discussion of current evidence and best practice, for the management of modifiable risks in those kidney and liver transplant patients who have survived the first postoperative year. In addition, the provision of a checklist increases the clinical utility and accessibility of these recommendations, by offering a systematic and efficient way to implement screening and monitoring of modifiable risks in the clinical setting.

Organ donor management: Eight common recommendations and actions that deserve reflection

Despite major advances in our understanding of the physiopathology of brain death (BD), there are important controversies as to which protocol is the most appropriate for organ donor management. Many recent reviews on this subject offer recommendations that are sometimes contradictory and in some cases are not applied to other critically ill patients. This article offers a review of the publications (many of them recent) with an impact upon these controversial measures and which can help to confirm, refute or open new areas of research into the most appropriate measures for the management of organ donors in BD, and which should contribute to discard certain established recommendations based on preconceived ideas, that lead to actions lacking a physiopathological basis. Aspects such as catecholamine storm management, use of vasoactive drugs, hemodynamic objectives and monitoring, assessment of the heart for donation, and general care of the donor in BD are reviewed.