Adequate lymph node assessment for extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2010;251:675-681. [PMID: 20224368 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181d3d2b2]

Prognostic relevance of lymph node metastasis in pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: Rational extent and number-based nodal classification for regional lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

We investigated the rational extent of regional lymphadenectomy and evaluated the prognostic impact of number-based regional nodal classification in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

This study included 191 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The nos. 8, 12a-b-c-p, 13, 14, and 17 nodes were dissected routinely. The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on prognostic stratification performed using number-based nodal classification was evaluated.

RESULTS

The incidence of metastasis in the routinely dissected nodes was 1.0-25.7%, with 5-year overall survival of 0-36.4% in patients with metastasis. The incidence of metastasis in the no. 12p nodes, which were not included in regional nodes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer or International Union Against Cancer staging systems, was 5.8% with a 5-year overall survival of 36.4% in patients with metastasis. When our dissected nodes were adopted (P < .001), number-based nodal classification predicted overall survival better than when regional nodes defined by the International Union Against Cancer or American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems were used (nos. 8, 12a-b, 13, 14, and 17 nodes with or without no. 9 nodes; P = .004 each). The 5-year overall survival in patients with pN0, pN1 (1-3 positive nodes), and pN2 (≥4 positive nodes) disease was 57.4%, 37.3%, and 13.6%, respectively (P < .001). The pN classification was an independent prognostic factor (pN1, P = .009; pN2, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The nos. 8, 12a-b-c-p, 13, 14, and 17 nodes should be prioritized as the rational extent of regional lymphadenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma for accurate staging. Number-based regional nodal classification is suitable for prognostic stratification.

Factors Contributing to the High Malignancy Level of Cholangiocarcinoma and Its Epidemiology: Literature Review and Data

CCA is a highly desmoplastic malignant cancer and is the second most common primary liver malignancy after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), accounting for approximately 15% of all primary liver tumors. CCA has a poor prognosis, with an average five-year survival rate of 9%, which is lower than that of pancreatic cancer. Although considerable efforts have been invested into the genomics, epigenetics, and risk factors, very little is known about what might have been the key causes for the high malignancy level of CCA. In this review, we analyze the incidence and mortality of CCA in different regions based on data from 1994 to 2022 obtained from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), discuss the current status of treatment of the disease, and focus on what might be the main factors contributing to the high malignancy level of CCA: alkalosis caused by the Fenton reaction, hypoxia, and the TIME. The review includes studies published from 1979 to 2024, aiming to provide an updated synthesis of basic early classical theoretical knowledge and current knowledge about CCA. By revealing the epidemiological characteristics of CCA, the potential mechanisms of high malignancy, and the current challenges of treatment, this review aims to provide new directions for future cancer research, promote the development of personalized treatment strategies, and facilitate a deeper understanding and the more effective management of CCA worldwide.

[Preliminary results of fluorescent lymphography in patients with biliary cancer undergoing liver resection]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic capability of intraoperative fluorescence lymphography (FLG) in detecting of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) and lymph outflow pathways in patients with biliary cancer (BC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From April 2023 till March 2024, ten liver resections for BC were performed using FLG. We carried out the standard lymph node dissection with additional removal of lymph nodes (LN) that have accumulated indocyanine green (ICG). The lymphatic outflow pathways in all patients and frequency of SLN invasion were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ten patients were included: five patients had been diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), two - with perichilar tumor (PT), the last three ones had gallbladder cancer (GBC). SLN No. 1 were detected in eight patients, the accumulation of ICG was detected in the following groups of LN: No. 8 (n=2), No. 13 (n=1), No. 12b (n=2), cystic lymph node (n=2), and No. 7 (n=1). SLN No. 2 was detected in seven patients. In three cases LN No. 13 were stained, in one - LN No. 12a, in another - LN No. 8. In two patients, staining of vesicular LN was noted. The combined morphological assessment of SLN No. 1 and SLN No. 2 made it possible to predict the presence of LN metastases in all patients (100%, n=3). Fluorescence of third-order LN was detected in four patients. In one case, the staining of LN No. 13 was noted. Another patient revealed accumulation of ICG in LN No. 3. In two cases, at the third stage, fluorescence of LN No. 7 was noted, while metastatic invasion of LN No. 7 was detected in one patient with IHCC.

CONCLUSION

Using FLG, it was possible to determine an alternative lymph flow outpath to LN No. 7 in three patients. The method allowed to identify and remove metastatic LN No. 7 in one case. 100% sensitivity was shown in the determination of SLN in BC in a small group of patients. It is advisable to study the sensitivity of the method in large-scale studies.

The prognostic impact of preoperative CA19-9 on resectable cholangiocarcinoma: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the prognostic survival impact of preoperative carbohydrate CA19-9 levels in resectable cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched for articles published through April 28, 2023. The relationship between preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and the prognosis of patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma was analyzed. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed by means of the I2 statistic. We also performed subgroup analyses based on anatomical site of the tumor, geographic region, time of occurrence, and different levels of CA19-9. A random effects model was performed to express effect sizes as Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 60 original studies were eligible for inclusion, with a total of 15,031 patients with all sites, including 9014 males. The overall Hazard Ratio for all studies was 1.90 (95% CI 1.74-2.07, p < 0.001, Z = 14.59). Publication bias was suggested by the Begg's test (p = 0.014 < 0.05), and the overall HR was 1.66 (95% CI 1.53-1.80, p < 0.001, Z = 12.027) after the trim-and-filling method. Subgroup analyses showed that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.79-2.23), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.49-1.82), hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HR = 1. 82, 95% CI 1.60-2.07), and distal cholangiocarcinoma (HR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.27-2.15) were predicted to be linked with prognosis. Elevated CA19-9 levels were associated with an increased risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that elevated CA19-9 levels were correlated with a poor prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma. In future, more distal and hilar cholangiocarcinoma should be included in statistical studies to improve the accuracy of our conclusions.

Benefit of lymph node dissection for perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma according to lymph node stations

BACKGROUND

The benefits of lymph node (LN) dissection at each station have not previously been fully investigated in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) and distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC).

METHODS

The efficacy index (EI) was calculated in patients who underwent surgery for PHCC (n = 134) and DCC (n = 135) by multiplying the frequency of metastasis to the LN station and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with metastasis to that station.

RESULTS

In PHCC, the frequency of metastasis, 5-year OS rates, and the EI in para-aortic LNs (4.7%, 0%, and 0, respectively) and posterior pancreaticoduodenal LNs (8.1%, 0%, and 0, respectively) were lower than those in hepatoduodenal ligament LNs (30.1%, 24.1%, and 7.25, respectively) and LNs along the common hepatic artery (CHA) (16.2%, 15.0%, and 2.43, respectively). In DCC, these values were lower in LNs along the CHA (6.4%, 0%, and 0, respectively) than in the posterior pancreaticoduodenal LNs (31.2%, 34.5%, and 10.8, respectively), the hepatoduodenal ligament LNs (14.8%, 15.2%, and 2.25, respectively), and para-aortic (4.0%, 25.0%, and 0.99, respectively) LNs.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the EI, this study raises concerns about the effectiveness of dissection in the posterior pancreaticoduodenal LNs in PHCC and LNs along the CHA in DCC.

[Surgical treatment and prognostic factors in perihilar tumors]

OBJECTIVE

To study the results of surgical treatment in patients with perihilar tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed 98 patients with perihilar tumors who underwent surgery.

RESULTS

We prefer percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (n=58) for jaundice. Retrograde interventions were performed in 18 cases (20.5%), complications grade III-IV were more common (p=0.037) in the last group. Postoperative mortality was 12%. Complications developed in 81 patients (82.7%), grade ≥3 - in 39 (39.8%) cases. Portal vein resection (n=26) increased the incidence of complications grade ≥III (p=0.035) and portal vein thrombosis (p=0.0001). Chemotherapy after surgery was performed in 47 patients (48.0%), photodynamic therapy - in 7 (7.1%) patients. A 5-year overall survival was 28.1%, the median survival - 29 months. R2 resection and/or M1 stage (n=12) significantly worsened the prognosis and overall survival (16.5 vs. 31 months, p=0.0055). Lymph node (LN) lesion, microscopic status (R0 vs. R1) of resection margin, technique of decompression and isolated resection of extrahepatic bile ducts did not affect the prognosis, and we combined appropriate patients (n=72) for analysis. SI resection and excision of ≥6 lymph nodes were independent positive factors for disease-free survival (p=0.042 and p=0.007, respectively). Blood transfusion and high preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte index (NLI ≥2.15) worsened overall (p=0.009 and p=0.002, respectively) and disease-free survival (p=0.002 and 0.007, respectively). The absence of adjuvant therapy worsened disease-free survival alone (p=0.024).

CONCLUSION

SI liver resection, adequate lymph node dissection and adjuvant therapy should be used for perihilar tumors. Isolated resection of extrahepatic bile ducts is permissible in some cases. Blood transfusion and NLI ≥2.15 are independent negative prognostic factors.

The value of total caudate lobe resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) is widely considered to have a poor prognosis. In particular, combined caudate lobe resection (CLR) as a strategy for radical resection in HCCA is important for improving the R0 resection rate. However, the criteria for R0 resection, necessity of CLR, optimal extent of hepatic resection, and surgical approach are still controversial. This review aimed to summarize the findings and discuss the controversies surrounding CLR. Numerous clinical studies have shown that combined CLR treatment for HCCA improves the R0 resection rate and postoperative survival time. Whether surgery for Bismuth type I or II is combined with CLR depends on the pathological type. Considering the anatomical factors, total rather than partial CLR is recommended to achieve a higher R0 resection rate. In the resection of HCCA, a proximal ductal margin greater than or equal to 10 mm should be achieved to obtain a survival benefit. Although there is no obvious boundary between the right side (especially the paracaval portion) and the right posterior lobe of the liver, Peng's resection line can serve as a reference marker for right-sided resection. Laparoscopic resection of the caudate lobe may be safer, more convenient, accurate, and minimally invasive than open surgery, but it needs to be completed by experienced laparoscopic doctors.

Lymph Node Dissection in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Critical and Updated Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic spread of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is common and negatively impacts survival. However, the precise role of lymph node dissection (LND) in oncologic outcomes for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains to be established.

METHODS

Updated evidence on the preoperative diagnosis and prognostic value of lymph node metastasis is reviewed, as well as the potential benefit of LND in patients with iCCA.

RESULTS

The ability to accurately determine nodal status for iCCA with current imaging modalities is equivocal. LND has prognostic value for both survival and disease recurrence. However, execution rates of LND are highly varied in the literature, ranging from 26.9 to 100%. At least 6 lymph nodes should be examined from nodal stations of the hepatoduodenal ligament and hepatic artery as well as based on the location of the primary tumor. Neoadjuvant therapies may be beneficial if lymph node metastases at diagnosis are suspected. Surgeons performing a minimally invasive approach should focus on increasing LND rates and harvesting ≥ 6 lymph nodes. Lymph node negativity is required in patients with iCCA being considered for liver transplantation under investigational protocols.

CONCLUSION

Despite an upward trend in the LND rate, the reality is that only 10% of patients with iCCA receive an adequate LND. This review underscores the importance of routinely increasing the rate of adequate LND in these patients in order to achieve accurate staging, appropriately select patients for adjuvant therapy, and improve the prognosis of clinical outcomes. While prospective data is lacking, the therapeutic impact of LND remains unknown.

Segmental bile duct resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal third bile duct cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding oncologic outcomes of segmental bile duct resection (SBDR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for bile duct cancers (BDC) are conflicting. We compared SBDR and PD for BDC utilizing pooled data analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive PRISMA 2020 systematic review was performed. Studies comparing SBDR with PD for BDC were included. Pooled mean differences (MD), odds ratios (OR), and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed. Study quality, bias, heterogeneity, and certainty were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve studies from 2004 to 2021 were included, comprising 533 SBDR and 1,313 PD. SBDR was associated with positive proximal duct margins (OR 1.56; CI 1.11-2.18; P = .01), and distal duct margins (OR 43.25; CI 10.38-180.16; P < .01). SBDR yielded fewer lymph nodes (MD -6.93 nodes; CI -9.72-4.15; P < .01) and detected fewer nodal metastases (OR 0.72; CI 0.55-0.94; P = .01). SBDR portended less perioperative morbidity (OR 0.31; CI 0.21-0.46; P < .01), but not mortality (OR 0.52; CI 0.20-1.32; P = .17). SBDR was associated with locoregional recurrences (OR 1.88; CI 1.01-3.53; P = .02), and lymph node recurrences (OR 2.13; CI 1.42-3.2; P = .04). SBDR yielded decreased 5-year OS (OR 0.75; CI 0.65-0.85; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite decreased perioperative morbidity, SBDR appears to provide inferior oncologic control for BDC.

Rational Extent of Regional Lymphadenectomy and the Prognostic Impact of the Number of Positive Lymph Nodes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The definition and classification of regional nodes are not standardized for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. This study aimed to clarify the rational extent of regional lymphadenectomy and to elucidate the impact of number-based regional nodal classification on survival of patients with this disease.

METHODS

Data of 136 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgery were reviewed. The incidence of metastasis and the survival of patients with metastasis were calculated for each node group.

RESULTS

The incidence of metastasis for the node groups in the hepatoduodenal ligament (denoted as no. 12) ranged from 3.7% to 25.4%, with 5-year disease-specific survival of 12.9% to 33.3% for patients with metastasis. The incidences of metastasis in the common hepatic artery (no. 8) and posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal (no. 13a) node groups were 14.4% and 11.2%, respectively, with 5-year disease-specific survival rates of 16.7% and 20.0% for the patients with metastasis. When these node groups were defined as regional nodes, the 5-year disease-specific survival rates for the patients with pN0 (n = 80), pN1 (1-3 positive nodes, n = 38), and pN2 (≥ 4 positive nodes, n = 18) were 61.4%, 22.9%, and 17.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). The pN classification was independently associated with disease-specific survival (p < 0.001). When only the no. 12 node groups were regarded as regional nodes, pN classification failed to stratify the patients prognostically.

CONCLUSIONS

No. 8 and no. 13a node groups should be considered regional nodes in addition to no. 12 node groups and should be dissected. The number-based regional nodal classification allows patients with this disease to be stratified prognostically.

Prognostic Factors for Distal Bile Duct Carcinoma After Surgery

BACKGROUND

Distal bile duct carcinoma continues to be one of the most difficult cancers to manage in terms of staging and radical resection. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with regional lymph node dissection has become the standard treatment of distal bile duct carcinoma. We evaluated treatment outcomes and histological factors in patients with distal bile duct carcinoma.

METHODS

Seventy-four cases of resection of carcinoma of the distal bile ducts treated at our department during the period from January 2002 and December 2016 using PD and regional lymph node dissection as the standard surgical procedure were investigated. Survival rates of factors were analyzed using uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The median survival time was 47.8 months. On univariate analysis, age of 70 years or older, histologically pap, pPanc2,3, pN1, pEM0, v2,3, ly2,3, ne2,3 and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were statistically significant factors. On multivariate analysis, histologically pap was identified as a significant independent prognostic factor. The multivariate analysis identified age of 70 years or older, pEM0, ne2,3 and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy as showing a significant trend towards independent prognostic relevance.

CONCLUSION

The good news about resected distal bile duct carcinoma is that the percentage of those who achieved R0 resection has risen to 89.1%. Our multivariate analysis identified age of 70 years or older, pEM0, ne2,3 and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy as prognostic factors. In order to improve the outcome of treatment, it is necessary to improve preoperative diagnostic imaging of pancreatic invasion and lymph node metastasis, establish the optimal operation range and clarify whether aortic lymph node dissection is needed to control lymph node metastasis, and establish effective regimens of chemotherapy.

A novel nomogram for adult primary perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and considerations concerning lymph node dissection

Objective

To construct a reliable nomogram available online to predict the postoperative survival of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Data from 1808 patients diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. They were randomly divided into training and validation sets. The nomogram was established by machine learning and Cox model. The discriminant ability and prediction accuracy of the nomogram were evaluated by concordance index (C-index), receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve. Kaplan-Meier curves show the prognostic value of the associated risk factors and classification system.

Results

Machine learning and multivariate Cox risk regression model showed that sex, age, tumor differentiation, primary tumor stage(T), lymph node metastasis(N), TNM stage, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, lymph node dissection were associated with the prognosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients relevant factors (P < 0.05). A novel nomogram was established. The calibration plots, C-index and ROC curve for predictions of the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were in excellent agreement. In patients with stage T1 and N0 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the prognosis of ≥4 lymph nodes dissected was better than that of 1- 3 lymph nodes dissected (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The nomogram prognostic prediction model can provide a reference for evaluating the prognosis and survival rate of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with stage T1 and N0 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma have more benefits by increasing the number of lymph node dissection.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical resection remains the most effective treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, due to the complex anatomy of the hilar region, the tumor is prone to invade portal vein and hepatic arteries, making the surgical treatment of HCCA particularly difficult. Successful laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA(IIIA, IIIB) requires excellent surgical skills and rich experience. Furthermore, the safety and effectiveness of this operation are still controversial.

AIM

To retrospectively analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open surgery for patients with HCCA.

METHODS

Clinical imaging and postoperative pathological data of 89 patients diagnosed with HCCA (IIIA, IIIB) and undergoing radical resection in our center from January 2018 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 6 patients (4 were lost to follow-up and 2 were pathologically confirmed to have other diseases after surgery) were ruled out, and clinical data was collected from the remaining 83 patients for statistical analysis. These patients were divided into an open surgery group (n=62) and a laparoscopic surgery group (n=21) according to the surgical methods used, and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), 32 and 16 patients respectively in the open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group were remained. The demographic data, Bismuth type, perioperative data, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, pathological findings, and long-term survivals were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

After 1:2 PSM, 32 patients in the open surgery group and 16 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group were included for further analysis. Baseline characteristics and pathological outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in intraoperative blood loss and operative time, as it were 400-800 mL vs 200-400 mL (P=0.012) and (407.97 ± 76.06) min vs (489.69 ± 79.17) min (P=0.001) in the open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group, respectively. The R0 resection rate of the open group was 28 cases (87.5%), and the R0 resection rate of the laparoscopic group was 15 cases (93.75%). The two groups showed no significant difference in terms of surgical approach, intraoperative blood transfusion, incidence of postoperative complications, and short- and long-term efficacy (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA has comparable perioperative safety compared to open surgery group, as it has less bleeding and shorter operation time. Although it is a promising procedure with the improvement of surgical skills and further accumulation of experience, further investigations are warranted before its wider application.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival After Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study

Background

Recurrence is the main cause of death in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients after surgery. Identifying patients with a high risk of recurrence is important for decision-making regarding neoadjuvant therapy to improve long-term outcomes.

Aim

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic model to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection of pCCA.

Methods

Patients following curative resection for pCCA from January 2008 to January 2016 were identified from a multicenter database. Using random assignment, 70% of patients were assigned to the training cohort, and the remaining 30% were assigned to the validation cohort. Independent predictors of RFS after curative resection for pCCA were identified and used to construct a prognostic model. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using calibration curves and the C-index.

Results

A total of 341 patients were included. The median overall survival (OS) was 22 months, and the median RFS was 14 months. Independent predictors associated with RFS included lymph node involvement, macrovascular invasion, microvascular invasion, maximum tumor size, tumor differentiation, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The model incorporating these factors to predict 1-year RFS demonstrated better calibration and better performance than the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in both the training and validation cohorts (C-indexes: 0.723 vs. 0.641; 0.743 vs. 0.607).

Conclusions

The prognostic model could identify patients at high risk of recurrence for pCCA to inform patients and surgeons, help guide decision-making for postoperative adjuvant therapy, and improve survival.

Prognostic nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a large cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to establish and validate a novel prognostic nomogram of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) patients.

METHODS

A training cohort of 536 patients and an internal validation cohort of 270 patients were included in this study. The demographic and clinicopathological variables were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed in the training cohort, followed by the construction of nomogram for CSS. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots and compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to measure the predictive power and clinical value of the nomogram.

RESULTS

The nomogram incorporating age, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node ratio (LNR) and T stage parameters was with a C-index of 0.655 in the training cohort, 0.626 in the validation cohort, compared with corresponding 0.631, 0.626 for the AJCC 8th staging system. The calibration curves exhibited excellent agreement between CSS probabilities predicted by nomogram and actual observation in the training cohort and validation cohort. DCA indicated that this nomogram generated substantial clinical value.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed nomogram provided a more accurate prognostic prediction of CSS for individual patients with resected HCCA than the AJCC 8th staging system, which might be served as an effective tool to stratify resected HCCA patients with high risk and facilitate optimizing therapeutic benefit.

Computer-assisted and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of tumors and tumor invasion of the duodenum

Aim: To present the computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging assessments of benign and malignant duodenal tumors, pancreatic head adenocarcinoma invading the duodenum, and duodenal dystrophy.

Methods: We searched for scientific papers and clinical guidelines in the information and analytical databases PubMed and Google Scholar from the 2013–2021 period using the following search terms: duodenal neoplasms, adenocarcinoma, duodenum, duodenal neuroendocrine tumors, duodenal adenoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, cholangiocarcinoma, radiology, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, pancreatic head cancer. Then, we examined the reference lists of all the identified studies to collate the papers that would meet the eligibility criteria.

Results: We analyzed 1494 articles, 22 of which were included in our review. From the papers published within 1992–2021, 35 articles from the reference lists were additionally included. Based on the search results, several domains of articles were clustered; the articles from those domains were reviewed and evaluated that involved the abovementioned diagnostic features.

Conclusion: The early diagnosis and selection of appropriate management methods remain extremely relevant for the treatment of duodenal tumors, and hence, require careful attention from diagnosticians and clinicians.

Comparison of Four Lymph Node Stage Methods for Predicting the Prognosis of Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Patients After Surgery

Background

The metastatic status of regional lymph nodes is an effective risk factor for the prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA). But existing lymph node staging is not accurate enough and is susceptible to interference. This study aims to explore the predictive ability of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) staging system of dCCA compared with existing lymph node staging systems.

Methods

A total of 928 dCCA patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database as the training cohort, and 207 dCCA patients from West China Hospital who underwent surgery were reviewed as the validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression were conducted to identify the most meaningful factors relevant to prognosis. The performance of four lymph node stage systems was compared by a model-based approach.

Result

Age at diagnosis, pathological grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor 7th T stage, tumor size, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and lymph node stage system were independent prognostic factors. The model with the LODDS system had a better model fit with the highest C-index (0.679) and 1-/3-/5- area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.739/0.671/0.658) as well as the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) (5,020.52). External validation results from 207 dCCA patients showed a C-index of 0.647 and 1-/3-/5-AUC of 0.740/0.683/0.589. Compared with the lymph node ratio (LNR), AJCC 8th N system, and 7th N system, the 5-year net reclassification improvement (NRI) of the LODDS system was 0.030 (95% CI: -0.079 to 0.147), 0.042 (95% CI: -0.062 to 0.139), and 0.040 (95% CI: -0.057 to 0.146), respectively. The integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of LODDS improved compared with the LNR model (0.016; 95% CI: -0.001 to 0.036), AJCC 8th N system (0.020; 95% CI: 0.003-0.037), and AJCC 7th N system (0.019; 95% CI: 0.002-0.036). Decision curve analysis (DCA) also shows a greater net benefit of LODDS. In lymph node-negative patients, LODDS reveals a positive linear relationship with the hazard ratio (HR). The stage capacity of LODDS in a subgroup analysis stratified by examined lymph node number (ELNN) was consistent.

Conclusions

The LODDS lymph node stage system has superior predictive performance as compared with the LNR, AJCC 7th, and 8th lymph node stage systems. Meanwhile, LODDS has a more detailed staging ability and good stability.

Deep Learning Radiomics to Predict Regional Lymph Node Staging for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Our aim was to establish a deep learning radiomics method to preoperatively evaluate regional lymph node (LN) staging for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) patients.

Methods and Materials

Of the 179 enrolled HC patients, 90 were pathologically diagnosed with lymph node metastasis. Quantitative radiomic features and deep learning features were extracted. An LN metastasis status classifier was developed through integrating support vector machine, high-performance deep learning radiomics signature, and three clinical characteristics. An LN metastasis stratification classifier (N1 vs. N2) was also proposed with subgroup analysis.

Results

The average areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of the LN metastasis status classifier reached 0.866 in the training cohort and 0.870 in the external test cohorts. Meanwhile, the LN metastasis stratification classifier performed well in predicting the risk of LN metastasis, with an average AUC of 0.946.

Conclusions

Two classifiers derived from computed tomography images performed well in predicting LN staging in HC and will be reliable evaluation tools to improve decision-making.

[Surgical treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma]

Distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for about 20% of bile duct cancers, representing the third most common tumor entity among periampullary cancers, along with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and carcinomas of the papilla of Vater. Precise diagnostics of tumor localization and exact knowledge of tumor-specific growth patterns are crucial for successful surgery. When planning the surgical procedure, the differential diagnosis of central bile duct cancer (Bismuth type I) or middle bile duct carcinoma must be considered. Although benign periampullary bile duct stenosis occurs in only 5% of cases, the presence of immunoglobulin G4-associated cholangitis (IAC) should be excluded in doubtful cases. Basically, in the presence of a distal cholangiocarcinoma, partial pancreatoduodenectomy is indicated analogous to the procedure for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. The 5‑year survival after resection is 20-25% and therefore comparable to adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Local resection of middle bile duct carcinoma is no longer recommended due to inadequate surgical radicality. To date, perioperative treatment for downsizing does not play a relevant role for surgical treatment of distal cholangiocarcinoma. In the presence of a distal cholangiocarcinoma primary surgery with the aim of a R0 resection is the standard treatment of choice.

The value of lymphadenectomy in surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). There is still no consensus on the value of lymphadenectomy despite evidence indicating lymph node (LN) status is an important prognostic indicator for postoperative long-term survival. We sought to perform a meta-analysis to summarize the current evidence on the value of lymphadenectomy among patients undergoing surgery for PHC. The PubMed (OvidSP), Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies published before July 2020 that reported on lymphadenectomy at the time of surgery for PHC after curative surgery. 7748 patients from 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No survival benefit was identified with increased number of LN resected (all P > 0.05). Meanwhile, overall LN status was an important prognostic factor. Patients with lymph node metastasis had a pooled estimate hazard ratio of death that was over two-fold higher than patients without lymph node metastasis (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.65-2.59, P < 0.001). The examination of 5 LNs on histology was associated with better staging of lymph node status and stratification of patients into positive or negative LN groups. While the extent of LN dissection was not associated with a survival benefit, examination of more than 5 LNs better staged patients into positive or negative LN groups with a lower risk of nodal understaging.

Re-appraising the role of lymph node status in predicting survival in resected distal cholangiocarcinoma - A meta-analysis and systematic review

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to confirm the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR), and determine an optimal LNR cut-off for overall survival (OS) in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) undergoing curative surgery. We additionally aimed to provide a consolidated review of current evidence regarding prognostic significance of positive lymph node count (PLNC) and total lymph node count (TLNC). A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to October 2020. Studies were included into meta-analysis if there was histological diagnosis, curative surgery, restriction to DCC and relevant LNR results. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Findings for 1228 patients were pooled across 6 studies. Meta-analysis delineated a dose-effect gradient in which higher LNR cut-offs correlated with larger pooled hazard ratios: 0<LNR<0.2 (HR 1.54; 95% CI 1.08-2.20; p = 0.02), LNR>0.2 (HR 3.26; 95% CI 2.07-5.13; p < 0.00001) and LNR>0.4 (HR 3.59; 95% CI 2.31-5.58; p < 0.00001) when compared against a control group of LNR = 0. LNR of 0.2 (HR 2.12; 95% CI: 1.57-2.86; p < 0.0001) was found to be a significant and ideal cut-off for prognostication of poorer OS. A review of current literature reveals an ongoing debate regarding the comparative prognostic value of differing PLNC cut-offs (0/1/3 versus 0/1/4). TLNC of 10-13 is widely reported to be the minimum necessary to ensure improved long term outcomes. PLNC and LNR are strong prognostic factors for OS in DCC. An ideal LNR cut-off of 0.2 is most significantly associated with poorer OS.

Recommended Minimal Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one factor indicating a poor prognosis after radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Although several guidelines have recommended that LN dissection be strongly considered at the time of ICC surgery, no clear evidence regarding the appropriate number of harvested LNs has been established. Thus, we aimed to identify the minimum number of harvested LNs required for ICC by using a Bayesian Weibull model.

METHODS

Data from 142 patients who underwent radical hepatectomy (R0) for ICC from January 2000 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. A Bayesian Weibull model was developed to analyze the effect of number of harvested LNs on survival of patients without (N0; n = 71) and with (N1; n = 71) metastatic nodes. We also compared the percentage of N1 patients (i.e., the N1 rate) in each of the five subgroups categorized according to the number of harvested LNs (1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, and ≥ 17).

RESULTS

In patients with 5 or more harvested LNs, the hazard ratio (HR) for LN metastasis was above the reference line (the HR with 5 harvested LNs, 1.95 (1.09-3.45)). The N1 rate of the 1-4 harvested LNs subgroup was lower than that of the other subgroups (e.g., 1-4 vs. 5-8; 16.1% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that at least 5 LNs should be harvested in patients who undergo radical surgery for ICC to promote accurate staging.

The Landmark Series: Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is a rare and highly aggressive biliary tract neoplasm. As such, the data driving the management of this disease generally are not based on prospective clinical trial data but rather consist of retrospective experiences and limited level 1 data. Surgical resection offers the best chance of a long-term survival, but local and distant recurrences are common. This report presents landmark articles that form the basis of preoperative, operative, and adjuvant strategies for HC.

Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness

Background

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) provides a new approach for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, whether it can achieve similar outcomes to traditional open surgery (OS) remains controversial.

Methods

To assess the safety and feasibility of MIS for HCCA, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of MIS with OS. Seventeen outcomes were assessed.

Results

Nine studies involving 382 patients were included. MIS was comparable in blood transfusion rate, R0 resection rate, lymph nodes received, overall morbidity, severe morbidity (Clavien–Dindo classification > = 3), bile leakage rate, wound infection rate, intra-abdominal infection rate, days until oral feeding, 1-year overall survival, 2-year overall survival and postoperative mortality with OS. Although operation time was longer (mean difference (MD) = 93.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 64.10 to 122.91, P < 0.00001) and hospital cost (MD = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.33, P = 0.04) was higher in MIS, MIS was associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness, that was less blood loss (MD = -81.85, 95% CI = -92.09 to -71.62, P < 0.00001), less postoperative pain (MD = -1.21, 95% CI = -1.63 to -0.79, P < 0.00001), and shorter hospital stay (MD = -4.22, 95% CI = -5.65 to -2.80, P < 0.00001).

Conclusions

The safety and feasibility of MIS for HCCA is acceptable in selected patients. MIS is a remarkable alternative to OS for providing comparable outcomes associated with a benefit of minimal invasiveness and its application should be considered more.

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Current status of endoscopic approach and additional therapies

The prognosis of patients with advanced or unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is poor. More than 50% of patients with jaundice are inoperable at the time of first diagnosis. Endoscopic treatment in patients with obstructive jaundice ensures bile duct drainage in preoperative or palliative settings. Relief of symptoms (pain, pruritus, jaundice) and improvement in quality of life are the aims of palliative therapy. Stent implantation by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is generally preferred for long-term palliation. There is a vast variety of plastic and metal stents, covered or uncovered. The stent choice depends on the expected length of survival, quality of life, costs and physician expertise. This review will provide the framework for the endoscopic minimally invasive therapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Moreover, additional therapies, such as brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy, radiofrequency ablation, chemotherapy, molecular-targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy by the endoscopic approach, are the nonsurgical methods associated with survival improvement rate and/or local symptom palliation.

Prognostic impact of lymph node parameters in distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the only definitively curative therapy for the long-term survival of distal cholangiocarcinoma patients. Lymph node metastasis is widely accepted as an important prognostic factor for distal cholangiocarcinoma. The latest American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification system for distal cholangiocarcinoma has divided the lymph node metastasis patients into N1 and N2 by lymph node metastasis number. However, some studies suggested that the lymph node metastasis ratio may be better than the lymph node metastasis number. Therefore, we develop a program to analyze the correlation between lymph node parameters (lymph node dissection number, lymph node metastasis number, and lymph node metastasis rate) and long-term prognosis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 123 distal cholangiocarcinoma patients after pancreatoduodenectomy from January 2011 to December 2019. The patients were grouped according to lymph node metastases and tumor-free and overall survival rates which were investigated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The logistic regression models were used for multivariate analysis to determine the risk factors for lymph node metastases. And the X-tile program was used to calculate the cutoff values for the lymph node parameters that discriminated survival.

Results

The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy were 75.2%, 37.1%, and 31.5%, respectively. And the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of patients without and with lymph node metastasis were 83.0%, 50.7%, and 42.5% and 63.5%, 19.0%, and 19.0% (p = 0.000), respectively. Logistic regression showed CA19-9 and portal vein system invasion as independent risk factors for lymph node metastases. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed the optimal cutoff value of CA19-9 to predict the lymph node metastases was 75.5 U/mL. Determined by the X-tile software, the optimal cutoff values of the lymph node dissection number were 24 (p = 0.021), the lymph node metastasis number were 1 and 7 (p = 0.504), and the lymph node metastasis rate were 0.13 (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Lymph node metastasis is an important factor affecting the long-term survival of distal cholangiocarcinoma patients.CA19-9 and portal vein system invasion are independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis. Besides, the lymph node dissection number and lymph node metastasis rate can predict the long-term survival better than lymph node metastasis number.

Optimal number of harvested lymph nodes for curatively resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma based on a Bayesian network model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To identify the optimal range and the minimum number of lymph nodes (LNs) to be examined to maximize survival time of patients with curatively resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC).

METHODS

Data were collected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database on patients with GBAC who underwent curative resection between 2004 and 2015. A Bayesian network (BN) model was constructed to identify the optimal range of harvested LNs. Model accuracy was evaluated using the confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

A total of 1268 patients were enrolled in this study. Accuracy of the BN model was 72.82%, and the area under the curve of the ROC for the testing dataset was 78.49%. We found that at least seven LNs should be harvested to maximize survival time, and that the optimal count of harvested LNs was in the range of 7 to 10 overall, with an optimal range of 10 to 11 for N+ patients, 7 to 10 for stage T1-T2 patients, and 7 to 11 for stage T3-T4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

According to a BN model, at least seven LNs should be retrieved for GBAC with curative resection, with an overall optimal range of 7 to 10 harvested LNs.

Extended Lymphadenectomy Versus Regional Lymphadenectomy in Resectable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of extended lymphadenectomy (E-LD) and regional lymphadenectomy (R-LD) on outcome after radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

METHODS

Data of 290 patients who underwent radical resection of HCCA were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics, surgical variables, and tumor and LN characteristics were evaluated for association with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients underwent E-LD. Patients who underwent E-LD were more likely to have portal vein embolization (14.3% vs. 5.7%), radical hepatectomy (36.2% vs. 26.0%), higher proportion of M1 patients (22.2% vs. 5.3%), more lymph nodes (LNs) retrieved (17 vs. 7), and positive common hepatic artery lymph nodes (21.4% vs. 12.6%) when compared with R-LD (all P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival for patients who underwent E-LD indicated improvement over patients who underwent R-LD in M0 (33.39 vs. 21.31 months; P = 0.032) and R0 resection (32.97 vs. 21.02 months; P = 0.044) disease, but not observed in M1 disease (P > 0.05). After propensity score matching, E-LD was not associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) even in all subgroup analysis (all P > 0.05). On multivariable analysis, E-LD was associated with improved overall survival, but not after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

E-LD is more likely to be performed in higher stage tumors. E-LD significantly increases LN retrieval, thereby preventing under-staging and improving survival prediction. E-LD should not be adopted for HCCA patients with intraoperatively confirmed distant LN metastases. Future studies are required to further assess whether E-LD should be performed in negative celiac, superior mesenteric, and para-aortic lymph node in HCCA patients.

Extended lymphadenectomy in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: What it will bring?

Lymph node dissection is always a hot issue in radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). There are still controversies regarding whether some lymph nodes should be dissected, of which the para-aortic lymph nodes are the most controversial. This review synthesized findings in the literature using the PubMed database of articles in the English language published between 1990 and 2019 on the effectiveness of extended lymphadenectomy including para-aortic lymph nodes dissection in radical resection of HCCA. Hepatobiliary surgeons have basically achieved a consensus that enough lymph nodes should be obtained to accurately stage HCCA. Only a very small number of studies have focused on the effectiveness of extended lymphadenectomy including para-aortic nodes dissection on HCCA. They reported that extended lymphadenectomy can bring some survival benefits for patients with potential para-aortic lymph node metastasis and more lymph nodes can be obtained to make the patient's tumor staging more accurate without increasing the related complications. Extended lymphadenectomy should not be adopted for HCCA patients with intraoperatively confirmed distant lymph node metastases. For these patients, radical resection combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be a better choice. A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical study of regional lymphotomy and extended lymphadenectomy in HCCA should be conducted to guide clinical practice. A standardized extended lymphadenectomy may help to more accurately stage HCCA. Future studies are required to further assess whether extended lymphadenectomy can improve long-term survival in negative celiac, superior mesenteric, and para-aortic lymph node diseases.

Proposal of the optimal numbers of examined and positive lymph nodes to the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for 758 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma

Introduction

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) recommended retrieval of at least 12 lymph nodes and firstly classified N category by the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma (DCC).

Objective

The end of this cohort study was to explore the optimal cut-off values of the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) and PLNs to better stratify patients by utilizing a population-based database.

Methods

A number of 758 patients with DCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled in the study and comparing by the survival analysis.

Results

Survival analysis found that patients with ELNs < 5 had a lower 3-year disease-specific survival rate than ELNs ≥ 5 in N0M0 cohort (35.3% vs. 53.0%, P = 0.001) and in M0 cohort (42.7% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.006); survival curves between patients with ELNs < 12 and ELNs ≥ 12 were overlapped in N0M0 cohort (P = 0.256) and in M0 cohort (P = 0.233). Among patients with ELNs ≥ 5, using the optimal cut-off value of the number of PLNs (0, 2) could accurately stratify patients, but the recommendation of the number of PLNs (0, 3) by the AJCC could not.

Conclusions

This study recommended examining at least 5 lymph nodes and defining PLNs = 1–2 as the N1 category and PLNs ≥ 3 as the N2 category, which may better stratify distal cholangiocarcinoma patients and improve the accuracy of the eighth edition AJCC staging.

Proposed Modification of Staging for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Based on the Lymph Node Ratio Using Korean Multicenter Database

The 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) included a positive lymph node count (PLNC), but a comparison of the prognostic predictive power of PLNC and lymph node ratio (LNR) is still under debate. This study aimed to compare various staging models made by combining the abovementioned factors, identify the model with the best predictive power, and propose a modified staging system. We retrospectively reviewed 251 patients who underwent surgery for DCC at four centers. To determine the superiority of various staging models for predicting overall OSR, Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), AIC correction (AICc), and Harrell’s C-statistic were calculated. In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.003), total lymph node count (p = 0.033), and revised T(LNR)M staging (p < 0.001) were identified as independent factors for overall survival rate. The predictive performance of revised T (LNR) M staging (AIC: 1288.925, BIC: 1303.377, AICc: 1291.52, and Harrell’s C statics: 0.667) was superior to other staging system. A modified staging system consisting of revised T category and LNR predicted better overall survival of DCC than AJCC 7th and AJCC 8th editions. In the future, external validation of the proposed new system using a larger cohort will be required.

Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System

Purpose

This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic values of the 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging systems for patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).

Materials and Methods

A total of 348 patients who underwent major hepatectomy for PHCC between 2008 and 2015 were identified from a single center. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared across stage groups with the log-rank test. The concordance index was used to evaluate the prognostic predictability of the 8th AJCC staging system compared with that of the 7th.

Results

In the 8th edition, the stratification of each group of T classification improved compared to that in the 7th, as the survival rate of T4 decreased (T2, 31.2%; T3, 13.9%; T4, 15.1%; T1-T2, p=0.260; T2-T3, p=0.001; T3-T4, p=0.996). Both editions showed significant survival differences between each N category, except between N1 and N2 (p=0.063) in 7th edition. Differences of point estimates between the 8th and 7th T and N classification and overall stages were +0.028, +0.006, and +0.039, respectively (T, p=0.005; N, p=0.115; overall stage, p=0.005). In multivariable analysis, posthepatectomy liver failure, T category, N category, distant metastasis, histologic differentiation, intraoperative transfusion, and resection margin status were associated with OS.

Conclusion

The prognostic predictability of 8th AJCC staging for PHCC improved slightly, with statistical significance, compared to the 7th edition, but its overall performance is still unsatisfactory.

Robotic radical surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single-centre case series

BACKGROUND

Radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma is considered one of the most complicated abdominal operations. We report our initial experience with robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Between March 2017 and February 2019, the perioperative outcomes of 48 patients were analysed. In addition, there were two techniques for hepaticojejunostomy in the robotic approach. Comparison of the conventional and novel methods for hepaticojejunostomy was also performed to assess the efficacy of the technique.

RESULTS

The operative duration and intraoperative blood loss volume was 276 minutes and 150 mL, respectively. The overall morbidity was 58.3% and the major morbidity was 10.4%. The overall mortality was 0%. No significant differences in the perioperative outcomes of hepaticojejunostomy were found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Robotic resection is a potential alternative to open surgery for appropriately selected patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Further studies are required to detect the long-term outcomes of this procedure.

Proposal of the minimal number of retrieved regional lymph nodes for accurate staging of distal bile duct cancer and clinical validation of the three-tier lymph node staging system (AJCC 8th edition)

BACKGROUND

The minimal required number of retrieved lymph nodes (MNRLNs) to enable accurate staging of distal bile duct (DBD) adenocarcinoma remains unclear. The three-tier 8th N staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) for DBD adenocarcinoma has been recently released. The present study is aimed at proposing the MNRLNs for accurate staging and validating the 8th N stage.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2015, patients with pathologically confirmed DBD adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were enrolled. MNRLN was calculated via a log-rank test based on cut-off values. The concordance index (C-index) was utilized to compare the discrimination capability of the two- and three-tier N stages.

RESULTS

A total of 780 patients were enrolled. Lymph node (LN) positivity and 5-year overall survival (5-YOS) rates stabilized and significant survival differences between node-negative and -positive patients were observed when ≥12 LNs were retrieved. 5-YOS rates between each 8th N stage significantly differ (N0 vs. N1, P = 0.037; N1 vs. N2, P = 0.003). The C-index of the 8th N stage was higher than that of the 7th (0.59 vs. 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

For accurate staging, at least 12 LNs should be retrieved. The three-tier N staging system is valid for clinical practice and has a more accurate prognostic predictability than the two-tier system.

Trends in the Number of Lymph Nodes Evaluated Among Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States: A Multi-Institutional and National Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of routine lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) remains poorly defined. The objective of the current study was to investigate trends in the number of lymph nodes (LN) evaluated for pNET treatment at a nationwide level.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for pNET between 2000 and 2016 were identified in the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group (US-NETSG) database as well as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The number of LNs examined was evaluated over time.

RESULTS

The median number of evaluated LNs increased roughly fourfold over the study period (US-NETSG, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 13 LNs; SEER, 2000: 3 LNs vs. 2016: 11 LNs, both p < 0.001). While no difference in 5-year OS and RFS was noted among patients who had 1-3 lymph node metastases (LNM) vs. ≥ 4 LNM between 2000-2007 (OS 73.5% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.12; RFS: 64.9% vs. 40.1%, p = 0.39), patients who underwent resection and LN evaluation during the period 2008-2016 had an incrementally worse survival if the patient had node negative disease, 1-3 LNM and ≥ 4 LNM (OS 86.8% vs. 82.7% vs. 74.9%, p < 0.001; RFS: 86.3% vs. 64.7% vs. 50.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a more recent year of diagnosis, pancreatic head tumor location, and tumor size > 2 cm were associated with 12 or more LNs evaluated in both US-NETSG and SEER databases.

CONCLUSION

The number of LNs examined nearly quadrupled over the last decade. The increased number of LNs examined suggested a growing adoption of the AJCC staging manual recommendations regarding LN evaluation in the treatment of pNET.

Outcome after liver resection for primary and recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is the only curative therapeutic option for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but the approach to recurrent ICC is controversial. This study analysed the outcome of liver resection in patients with recurrent ICC.

METHODS

Demographic, radiological, clinical, operative, surgical pathological and follow-up data for all patients with a final surgical pathological diagnosis of ICC treated in a tertiary referral centre between 2001 and 2015 were collected retrospectively and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients had liver resection for primary ICC. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 74·8, 56·6 and 37·9 per cent respectively. Independent determinants of OS were age 65 years or above (hazard ratio (HR) 2·18, 95 per cent c.i. 1·18 to 4·0; P = 0·012), median tumour diameter 5 cm or greater (HR 2·87, 1·37 to 6·00; P = 0·005), preoperative biliary drainage (HR 2·65, 1·13 to 6·20; P = 0·025) and local R1-2 status (HR 1·90, 1·02 to 3·53; P = 0·043). Recurrence was documented in 87 patients (45·8 per cent). The mean(s.d.) survival time after recurrence was 16(17) months. Independent determinants of recurrence were median tumour diameter 5 cm or more (HR 1·71, 1·09 to 2·68; P = 0·020), high-grade (G3-4) tumour (HR 1·63, 1·04 to 2·55; P = 0·034) and local R1 status (HR 1·70, 1·09 to 2·65; P = 0·020). Repeat resection with curative intent was performed in 25 patients for recurrent ICC, achieving a mean survival of 25 (95 per cent c.i. 16 to 34) months after the diagnosis of recurrence. Patients deemed to have unresectable disease after recurrence received chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy alone, and had significantly poorer survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with recurrent ICC may benefit from repeat surgical resection.

Surgical Considerations of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Hilar lesions are most common. Patients present with obstructive jaundice and intrahepatic bile duct dilation. Cross-sectional imaging reveals local, regional, and distant extent of disease, with direct cholangiography providing tissue for diagnosis. The consensus of a multidisciplinary committee dictates treatment. Resection of the extrahepatic bile duct and ipsilateral hepatic lobe with or without vascular resection and transplantation after neoadjuvant protocol are options for curative treatment. The goal of surgery is to remove the tumor with negative margins. Patients with inoperable tumors or metastatic disease are best served with palliative chemoradiotherapy.

Prognostic comparison of the longitudinal margin status in distal bile duct cancer: R0 on first bile duct resection versus R0 after additional resection

BACKGROUND

This study investigated survival differences following intra-operative frozen-section examination of bile duct resection margins and final longitudinal margin status (LMS) in distal bile duct cancer (BDC).

METHODS

One hundred and ninety-three patients underwent Whipple's operation for curative resection of distal BDC from 2008 to 2016. Patients were sorted into two and three groups according to LMS of the frozen-sections and the final pathological specimen results: R0 on first bile duct resection (primary R0), R0 after additional resection (secondary R0), and no evidence of residual carcinoma (FR0), carcinoma in situ or high-grade dysplasia (FR1-CIS/HGD), or invasive carcinoma (FR1-INV). Survival and prognostic factors according to LMS were analyzed.

RESULTS

The final R0 ratio increased from 82.3% to 90.1% through additional resection. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of primary and secondary R0 were 60.8%, 46.1% (P = 0.969). And disease-free survival of primary and secondary R0 were 54.6%, 54.9% (P = 0.903). The 5-year OS after FR0, FR1-CIS/HGD, FR1-INV were 59.3%, 59.5%, 14.3% (P = 0.842). LMS of the bile duct was an independent prognostic factor by multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

If R0 of final LMS was achieved, it would help to improve survival regardless of R0 through additional resection. And, it should be avoided remaining invasive cancer at the longitudinal margin whenever possible.

Predictive factors of early recurrence after R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A single institution experience in China

Prediction of early postoperative recurrence is of great significance for follow-up treatment. However, there are few studies available that focus on high-risk factors of early postoperative recurrence or even the definition the exact time of early recurrence for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Thus, we aimed to examine the optimal cut-off value for defining the early in patients with R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and to investigate prognostic factors associated with early recurrence. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2015 were included. The minimum P value approach was used to define the optimal cut-off of early recurrence. The prognostic factors associated with early recurrence were investigated. The optimal cut-off value for dividing patients into early and non-early recurrence groups after R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma was 12 months. Sixty-two patients were recorded as early recurrence, and the remaining 196 patients were labeled as non-early recurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.756, 95% CI 1.409-5.393; P = 0.003), poor differentiation (OR = 1.653; 95% CI 1.040-2.632; P = 0.034), increased postoperative CA 19-9 levels (OR = 1.965, 95% CI 1.282-3.013; P = 0.002), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio > 3.41 (OR = 5.125, 95% CI 2.419-10.857; P < 0.001) and age > 60 years (OR = 2.018, 95% CI 1.032-3.947; P = 0.040) were independent determinants of early and non-early recurrence. Poor differentiation (HR = 2.609, 95% CI 1.600-4.252; P < 0.001), Bismuth classification type III/IV (HR = 2.510, 95% CI 1.298-4.852; P = 0.006) and perineural invasion (HR=2.380, 95% CI 1.271-4.457; P = 0.007) were independent factors of overall survival in the subgroup of patients who developed early recurrence. The optimal cut-off value for dividing early recurrence after R0 resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma was 12 months. Tumor differentiation, Bismuth classification, and perineural invasion were independent factors of overall survival in the subgroup of patients with early recurrence. Patients with risk factors should be monitored closely after curative surgery.

Prognostic Significance of the Lymph Node Ratio in Surgical Patients With Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) versus positive lymph node count (PLNC) in patients who had undergone resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

We identified 448 patients with resected distal cholangiocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The X-Tile program was used to calculate the cutoff values for the LNR and PLNC that discriminate survival. The overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were calculated. Relationships between clinicopathological factors and patient survival were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff values for the LNR and PLNC were 0.45 and 3, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, T stage, the LNR and PLNC were significantly associated with prognosis (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the LNR, T stage, and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific and overall survival, whereas PLNC was not. In the subgroup of patients with positive lymph nodes, patients with an LNR of greater than 0.45 had significantly worse cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 2.418; 95% confidence interval, 1.588 to 3.682; P < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.149; 95% CI, 1.421 to 3.249; P < 0.001) than those with an LNR of 0.45 or less.

CONCLUSIONS

The LNR was a better predictor of long-term prognosis than PLNC in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Prognostic value of retrieved lymph node counts in patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to find out the prognostic value and optimal cut-off value of retrieved lymph node (LN) counts in patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinomas.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to screen out patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The cut-off number of retrieved LNs was determined by the X-tile programme. Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 778 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (2004-2014) met the inclusion criteria for this research, and there were 403 patients without LN metastases (N0) among them. The cut-off numbers of retrieved LNs, which were determined using the X-tile programme, were 8 and 18. Both results of univariate and multivariate survival analyses in N0 patients showed that patients with ≥18 retrieved LNs had a significantly better survival rate than patients with 1-7 retrieved LNs and patients with 8-17 retrieved LNs. In the subgroup of patients with early-stage tumours, patients with at least 13 retrieved LNs had a significantly better overall and cancer-specific survival than patients with fewer retrieved LNs.

CONCLUSIONS

The retrieved LN counts are an independent prognostic factor for patients with node-negative perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with at least 18 retrieved LNs had a better overall and cancer-specific survival than patients with fewer retrieved LNs. The minimum requirement for retrieving of LNs should reach 18 in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Dual-organ invasion is associated with a lower survival rate than single-organ invasion distal bile duct cancer: A multicenter study

The revised criteria of the 8^th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system consider depth of invasion as one of the factors that determine stage in distal bile duct (DBD) cancer, but exclude adjacent organ invasion. The aims were to evaluate the association between adjacent organ invasion and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after curative surgical resection of DBD cancer and to propose optimal criteria for predicting clinical outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, 378 patients with DBD cancer treated in multi-institutions between 1996 and 2013 were investigated. This study evaluated the relationship between clinicopathologic parameters and adjacent organ invasion and used organ invasion to compare the survival times of each group. Among 204 patients with adjacent organ invasion, 152 were in the single-organ invasion group and 52 were in the dual-organ invasion group based on a review of microscopic slides. In univariate and multivariate analyses, patients with dual-organ invasion had a shorter RFS and OS time than those with single-organ invasion. Organ invasion should be included as one of the factors that determine the AJCC stage; this might ultimately help to predict better the survival rate of patients with DBD cancer.

Optimal extent of surgical and pathologic lymph node evaluation for resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) status is an important predictor of overall survival for resected IHCC, yet guidelines for the extent of LN dissection are not evidence-based. We evaluated whether the number of LNs resected at the time of surgery is associated with overall survival for IHCC.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative-intent (R0 or R1) resection for IHCC between 2004 and 2012 were identified within the US National Cancer Database. LN thresholds were evaluated using maximal chi-square testing and five-year overall survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regressions.

RESULTS

57% (n = 1,132) of 2,000 patients had one or more LNs resected and pathologically examined. In the 631 patients undergoing R0 resection with pN0 disease, maximal chi-square testing identified ≥3 LNs as the threshold most closely associated with overall survival. Only 39% of resections reached this threshold. On multivariable survival analysis, no threshold of LNs was associated with overall survival, including ≥3 LNs (p = 0.186) and the current American Joint Committee on Cancer recommendation of ≥6 LNs (p = 0.318).

CONCLUSION

In determining the extent of lymphadenectomy at the time of curative-intent resection for IHCC, surgeons should carefully consider the prognostic yield in the absence of overall survival benefit.